Precipitating Energy Flux Research Articles

Global Survey of Energetic Electron Precipitation at Low Earth Orbit Observed by ELFIN

AbstractWe statistically evaluate the global distribution and energy spectrum of electron precipitation at low‐Earth‐orbit, using unprecedented pitch‐angle and energy resolved data from the Electron Losses and Fields INvestigation CubeSats. Our statistical results indicate that during active conditions, the ∼63 keV electron precipitation ratio peaks at L > 6 at midnight, whereas the spatial distribution of precipitating energy flux peaks between the dawn and noon sectors. ∼1 MeV electron precipitation ratio peaks near midnight at L > ∼6 but is enhanced near dusk during active times. The energy spectrum of the precipitation ratio shows reversal points indicating energy dispersion as a function of L shell in both the slot region and at L > ∼6, consistent with hiss‐driven precipitation and current sheet scattering, respectively. Our findings provide accurate quantification of electron precipitation at various energies in a broad region of the Earth's magnetosphere, which is critical for magnetosphere‐ionosphere coupling.

Inter‐Hemispheric Energy Input Into the Ionosphere‐Thermosphere System During Magnetic Storms: What We Can and Cannot Learn From DMSP Observations

AbstractWe present a long‐term superposed epoch analysis and statistical study with 427 magnetic storms caused by coronal mass ejections and the subsequent magnetospheric energy input into the ionosphere‐thermosphere system. Electron and ion precipitating energy flux data along with plasma drift velocity and magnetic field data (used for Earth‐bound Poynting flux computations) are used in this study. By carefully exploring conjugated inter‐hemispheric energy inputs as a function of storm intensity and seasons, we find that near two‐decades of Defense Meteorological Satellite Program observations indicate that the northern hemisphere (NH) receives slightly more energy than the southern hemisphere (SH) (Poynting flux and integrated electron/ion precipitating energy flux), with the NH receiving more energy as the storm becomes more intense. However, for the Poynting flux case, we find that generally the SH receives more energy when the east‐west component of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) becomes highly positive (By ≥ +5 nT), whereas this pattern reverses for cases when IMF By is highly negative (By ≤ −5 nT). The inter‐hemispheric interpretation for electron and ion precipitation energy inputs is ambiguous due to a severe lack of conjugated observations around the midnight sector for both hemispheres.

Properties of Electrons Accelerated by the Ganymede‐Magnetosphere Interaction: Survey of Juno High‐Latitude Observations

AbstractThe encounter between the Jovian co‐rotating plasma and Ganymede gives rise to electromagnetic waves that propagate along the magnetic field lines and accelerate particles by resonant or non‐resonant wave‐particle interaction. They ultimately precipitate into Jupiter's atmosphere and trigger auroral emissions. In this study, we use Juno/JADE, Juno/UVS data, and magnetic field line tracing to characterize the properties of electrons accelerated by the Ganymede‐magnetosphere interaction in the far‐field region. We show that the precipitating energy flux exhibits an exponential decay as a function of downtail distance from the moon, with an e‐folding value of 29°, consistent with previous UV observations from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). We characterize the electron energy distributions and show that two distributions exist. Electrons creating the Main Alfvén Wing (MAW) spot and the auroral tail always have broadband distribution and a mean characteristic energy of 2.2 keV while in the region connected to the Transhemispheric Electron Beam (TEB) spot the electrons are distributed non‐monotonically, with a higher characteristic energy above 10 keV. Based on the observation of bidirectional electron beams, we suggest that Juno was located within the acceleration region during the 11 observations reported. We thus estimate that the acceleration region is extended, at least, between an altitude of 0.5 and 1.3 Jupiter radius above the 1‐bar surface. Finally, we estimate the size of the interaction region in the Ganymede orbital plane using far‐field measurements. These observations provide important insights for the study of particle acceleration processes involved in moon‐magnetosphere interactions.

Probing the Magnetospheric Generator of Quiet Electrostatic Auroral Arcs From Ground Based Optical Observations and Magnetosphere‐ionosphere Coupling Modeling

AbstractObservations of a quiet electrostatic auroral arc by the ALIS network on 5 March 2008 are used to infer a two‐dimensional map of the flux of precipitating energy. Among a family of numerical solutions of a stationary magnetosphere—ionosphere coupling model in which the origin of the arc is a magnetospheric generator interface, we find which generator interface properties best fit the observed precipitating energy flux. The procedure finds that the plasma populations in the generator are colder and more rarefied on one side of the interface and warmer and denser on the other side, similar to a transition between plasma trough and plasma sheet plasmas. The increase of the arc's brightness, the decrease of its thickness and its slight spatial undulation may be driven by an increase of plasma sheet electron temperature in the tailward direction, tangential to the interface, and a local spatial indentation in the dawn‐ward direction.

Statistical Characteristics of the Electron Isotropy Boundary

AbstractUtilizing observations from the Electron Losses and Fields Investigation satellites, we present a statistical study of ∼2,000 events in 2019–2020 characterizing the occurrence in magnetic local time (MLT) and latitude of ≥50 keV electron isotropy boundaries (IBs) and associated electron precipitation. The isotropy boundary of an electron of a given energy is the magnetic latitude poleward of which persistent isotropized pitch angle distributions (Jprec/Jperp ∼ 1) are first observed to occur, interpreted as resulting from magnetic field‐line curvature scattering in the equatorial magnetosphere. We find that energetic electron IBs can be well‐recognized on the nightside from dusk until dawn, under all geomagnetic activity conditions, with a peak occurrence rate of almost 90% near ∼22 hr in MLT, remaining above 80% from 21 to 01 MLT. The observed IBs span International Geophysical Reference Field (IGRF) magnetic latitudes of 60°–74° with a maximum occurrence between 66° and 71° (L of 6–8), trending toward lower latitudes and premidnight local times with activity. The precipitating energy flux of ≥50 keV electrons averaged over the IB‐associated latitudes varies over four orders of magnitude, up to 1 erg/cm2‐s, and often includes wide‐energy electron spectra exceeding 1 MeV. The IB‐associated energies and precipitating fluxes also exhibit peak values near midnight for low activity, shifting toward premidnight for elevated activity. The average total precipitating power deposited over the high‐latitude nightside atmosphere (55°–80°; IGRF L ≥ 3) attributed to IBs is 10%–20%, or 10 MW, but at times can approach 100% of the total ≥50 keV electron energy deposition over the entire subauroral and auroral zone region, exceeding 1 GW.

Characteristics of Electron Precipitation Directly Driven by Poloidal ULF Waves

AbstractA mechanism recently proposed for magnetospheric electron loss into the atmosphere is the precipitation directly driven by ultralow‐frequency (ULF) waves. In this study, we quantitatively analyze the properties of ULF wave‐induced precipitation by simulating the electron bounce and drift motion in poloidal‐mode waves excited in a dipole magnetic field. Our results reveal that precipitation occurs only when electrons encounter a westward‐directed wave electric field in the magnetosphere, which leads to cross‐field energy enhancements and reduces their mirror heights. The simulations also demonstrate longer duration electron precipitation at the drift‐resonance energy. We calculate the temporal variations of the energy spectrum for precipitating electrons and the total precipitating energy fluxes. These results improve our understanding of ULF wave‐induced electron precipitation as well as provide a point of comparison for observations from balloons or ground‐based instruments.

Effects of the Ionospheric Conductance on the Dynamics of the Magnetotail

AbstractWe have carried out a series of numerical experiments designed to evaluate the sensitivity of global magnetohydrodynamic simulations to changes in ionospheric conductance. We multiplied the precipitating energy fluxes due to both strong pitch angle scattering and parallel currents by constant factors in the Robinson et al. (1987, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA092iA03p02565) model and used them as input to a simulated substorm interval on 14 March 2008. We also used the Kaeppler et al. (2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021396) model. When we reduced the energy fluxes by a factor of about three (0.34), the agreement on substorm location was best. Larger conductances led to onset at later local times. For multiplication factors greater than one, the magnetotail became line tied and no flows entered the inner magnetotail region. Relatively small (<50%) differences in the conductances lead to major changes in the tail configuration. We calculated auroral indices from the simulations and compared them to observations. None of the models reproduced the DP1 system but, we obtained much better agreement with the observed DP2 system. The model with the basic Robinson formula gave the best agreement with the DP2 system. We also ran a generic simulation with constant solar wind and southward IMF using the basic Robinson et al. model. The results were very similar to those of the event simulation suggesting that the changes were due to the ionospheric boundary condition. In the simulation, the energy flux obtained by assuming strong pitch angle scattering makes a larger contribution to the conductance than the field‐aligned current energy flux.

Discrete Aurora on the Nightside of Mars: Occurrence Location and Probability

AbstractThis paper represents the first attempt to predict the occurrence location and probability of discrete electron aurora on the nightside of Mars. We run a 3‐D time‐dependent magnetohydrodynamic model to characterize the spatial and temporal dynamics of magnetic field and plasma distributions over the course of one planetary rotation. We perform eight simulation cases under solar minimum quiet‐solar‐wind conditions (four equinox/solstice seasons, each with two interplanetary magnetic field polarities) and in an actual interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) case to assess quiet and space weather situations, respectively. The occurrence of detectable discrete aurora is subject to the combination of the probabilities that (a) the ionosphere is magnetically connected with high altitudes through open field lines and (b) precipitating energy fluxes of >30 eV electrons exceed 0.1 erg/cm2/s. Our results show that during quiet solar activity, discrete aurora occurs likely on small‐scale patches embedded inside strong crustal magnetic field regions (with a magnitude greater than 50 nT at 150 km), and the overall chance across the globe is ∼0.77%. The higher probability over strong crustal field regions is attributed to the stronger magnetic field convergence. Modeling shows the occurrence probability dramatically increases during the ICME event, particularly by more than an order of magnitude in weak crustal field regions. Our model results reasonably agree with NASA Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN and Mars Express observations. Our study suggests that nightside discrete electron aurora is not caused by the direct entry of magnetosheath plasma in a cusp‐like process but due to the recycling of nightside magnetospheric electrons.

Relation of Jupiter's Dawnside Main Emission Intensity to Magnetospheric Currents During the Juno Mission

AbstractWe compare Jupiter's dawn‐side main auroral emission intensity observed by the Hubble Space Telescope with the simultaneous magnitude of the dawn‐side magnetospheric equatorial radial current as observed by Juno during Orbits 3–7. We show that the peak auroral intensity and the square of the radial current per radian of azimuth are strongly correlated with R ≈ 0.9, and that the chance that the two phenomena are unrelated is negligible. We also fit empirical profiles of the total radial current flowing per radian of azimuth to the observed values and estimate the precipitating electron energy flux during each observation, and show this exhibits a similar correlation to the current. We find 1 mW m−2 of precipitating energy flux is associated with ∼5–11 kR of auroral emission, consistent with modeling studies. This is the first demonstration of a statistical relationship between the intensity of Jupiter's auroras and the strength of the magnetospheric currents, specifically the radial current, the j × B force of which accelerates plasma in the sense of planetary rotation. This result provides compelling evidence that the magnetosphere‐ionosphere coupling current system at Jupiter plays a key role in powering the planet's dawn side main auroral emission. We further show that there is no association between the auroral intensity and the rate of change of the magnetic energy density outside the current sheet.

Estimating Precipitating Energy Flux, Average Energy, and Hall Auroral Conductance From THEMIS All-Sky-Imagers With Focus on Mesoscales

Recent attention has been given to mesoscale phenomena across geospace (∼10 s km to 500 km in the ionosphere or ∼0.5 RE to several RE in the magnetosphere), as their contributions to the system global response are important yet remain uncharacterized mostly due to limitations in data resolution and coverage as well as in computational power. As data and models improve, it becomes increasingly valuable to advance understanding of the role of mesoscale phenomena contributions—specifically, in magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling. This paper describes a new method that utilizes the 2D array of Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) white-light all-sky-imagers (ASI), in conjunction with meridian scanning photometers, to estimate the auroral scale sizes of intense precipitating energy fluxes and the associated Hall conductances. As an example of the technique, we investigated the role of precipitated energy flux and average energy on mesoscales as contrasted to large-scales for two back-to-back substorms, finding that mesoscale aurora contributes up to ∼80% (∼60%) of the total energy flux immediately after onset during the early expansion phase of the first (second) substorm, and continues to contribute ∼30–55% throughout the remainder of the substorm. The average energy estimated from the ASI mosaic field of view also peaked during the initial expansion phase. Using the measured energy flux and tables produced from the Boltzmann Three Constituent (B3C) auroral transport code (Strickland et al., 1976; 1993), we also estimated the 2D Hall conductance and compared it to Poker Flat Incoherent Scatter Radar conductance values, finding good agreement for both discrete and diffuse aurora.

Global Survey of Electron Precipitation due to Hiss Waves in the Earth’s Plasmasphere and Plumes

AbstractWe present a global survey of energetic electron precipitation from the equatorial magnetosphere due to hiss waves in the plasmasphere and plumes. Using Van Allen Probes measurements, we calculate the pitch angle diffusion coefficients at the bounce loss cone, and evaluate the energy spectrum of precipitating electron flux. Our ∼6.5‐year survey shows that, during disturbed times, hiss inside the plasmasphere primarily causes the electron precipitation at L > 4 over 8 h < MLT < 18 h, and hiss waves in plumes cause the precipitation at L > 5 over 8 h < MLT < 14 h and L > 4 over 14 h < MLT < 20 h. The precipitating energy flux increases with increasing geomagnetic activity, and is typically higher in the plasmaspheric plume than the plasmasphere. The characteristic energy of precipitation increases from ∼20 keV at L = 6–∼100 keV at L = 3, potentially causing the loss of electrons at several hundred keV.

On the Ion Precipitation due to Field Line Curvature (FLC) and EMIC Wave Scattering and Their Subsequent Impact on Ionospheric Electrodynamics

AbstractBoth field line curvature (FLC) and electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) wave scattering are believed to be associated with energetic ion precipitation, but their relative contributions to ionospheric ion precipitation and subsequent effects are still unclear. In this study, by using a kinetic ring current model, we investigate their impact on the ionosphere from two aspects: the global distribution of ion precipitation and resulting ionospheric conductance. Our results show that the intensity and coverage of ion precipitation due to EMIC waves are larger than that due to FLC scattering, while the latter mostly contributes to ion precipitation in outer regions (L > 4–5). We then estimate the conductance with empirical models using the simulated ion precipitation energy flux. When the EMIC wave associated proton precipitation is included, the conductance is significantly enhanced in the dusk‐to‐midnight sector and has a wide magnetic latitude (MLAT) range from around 52° to 62°, considerably altering the electric potential in the dusk sector, which further influences particle dynamics in the magnetosphere. On the contrary, the proton precipitation caused by FLC scattering only occurs at higher latitudes above MLAT = 60° and the corresponding conductance is slightly enhanced at midnight, with negligible influence on the convective electric potential. Although electron precipitation‐associated conductance is predominant globally, the results show that proton precipitation can also play an important role in ionospheric electrodynamics, especially when EMIC wave‐associated precipitating proton energy flux exceeds that of electrons in the dusk sector, a region where many subauroral coupling processes occur.

Global Survey of Plasma Sheet Electron Precipitation due to Whistler Mode Chorus Waves in Earth's Magnetosphere

AbstractWhistler mode chorus waves can scatter plasma sheet electrons into the loss cone and produce the Earth's diffuse aurora. Van Allen Probes observed plasma sheet electron injections and intense chorus waves on 24 November 2012. We use quasilinear theory to calculate the precipitating electron fluxes, demonstrating that the chorus waves could lead to high differential energy fluxes of precipitating electrons with characteristic energies of 10–30 keV. Using this method, we calculate the precipitating electron flux from 2012 to 2019 when the Van Allen Probes were near the magnetic equator and perform global surveys of electron precipitation under different geomagnetic conditions. The most significant electron precipitation due to chorus is found from the nightside to dawn sectors over 4 < L < 6.5. The average total precipitating energy flux is enhanced during disturbed conditions, with time‐averaged values reaching ~3–10 erg/cm2/s when AE ≥ 500 nT.

Energy Budget of High-speed Plasma Flows in the Terrestrial Magnetotail

Abstract Significant advances have been presented for the theoretical model and quantitative investigation of the energy input from the solar wind and its subsequent release into the ring current, the Joule heating, and particle precipitation energy flux that are closely related to high-speed flows in the plasma sheet of the terrestrial magnetotail during both isolated and storm-time substorms. Here we further determine the plasma flow vorticity/shear and heating observed in the terrestrial magnetotail by the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission by deducing that other energy may be dissipated along with the above-mentioned three energy releases. The energy transported by the flow is also estimated here. Three-dimensional observations have shown new detailed information that can be compared with quasi-2D simulations. In this investigation, we calculate vorticity/shear directly from simultaneous observation of four MMS satellites. Our results generally indicate that plasma heating or temperature enhancements are related to both the flow vorticity/shear and current density, but more strongly with flow vorticity/shear. This research suggests that the ubiquitous energy input from the solar wind can be used to estimate plasma heating or temperature enhancements in the absence of any process or phenomenon relating to explosive energy release in planetary magnetospheres.

The Magnetosphere‐Ionosphere Electron Precipitation Dynamics and Their Geospace Consequences During the 17 March 2013 Storm

AbstractDuring geomagnetic storms and substorms, the magnetosphere and ionosphere are strongly coupled by precipitating magnetospheric electrons from the Earth's plasma sheet and driven by both magnetospheric and ionospheric processes. Magnetospheric wave activity initiates electron precipitation, and the ionosphere and upper atmosphere further facilitate this process by enhancing the value of precipitated energy fluxes via connection of two magnetically conjugate regions and multiple atmospheric reflections. This paper focuses on the resulting electron energy fluxes and affiliated height‐integrated Pedersen and Hall conductances in the auroral regions produced by multiple atmospheric reflections during the 17 March 2013 geomagnetic storm and their effects on the inner magnetospheric electric field and ring current. Our study is based on the magnetically and electrically self‐consistent Rice Convection Model‐Equilibrium of the inner magnetosphere with SuperThermal Electron Transport modified electron energy fluxes that take into account the electron energy interplay between the two magnetically conjugate ionospheres. SuperThermal Electron Transport‐modified energy flux in the Rice Convection Model‐Equilibrium leads to a significant difference in the global conductance pattern, ionospheric electric field formation, Birkeland current structure, ring current energization and its energy content, subauroral polarization drifts intensifications and their spatial locations, interchange instability redistribution, and overall energy interplay on the global scale.

Poynting Flux in the Dayside Polar Cap Boundary Regions From DMSP F15 Satellite Measurements

AbstractPoynting flux, which describes electromagnetic energy flux, is an important energy source for the high‐latitude upper atmosphere. After the launch of Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) F15 spacecraft with a boom‐mounted magnetometer on board, there was a new opportunity to calculate Earth‐directed Poynting flux at satellite altitudes (~850 km) in the upper atmosphere. A persistent enhancement of thermospheric density in the dayside polar cap boundary regions has been reported in the CHAMP satellite observations. To understand the significance of different physical mechanisms including Poynting flux and particle precipitation, and the correlation between them, a statistical study of Poytning flux and particle energy flux in the dayside cusp and low‐latitude boundary layer (LLBL) regions has been conducted based on DMSP F15 measurements. DMSP satellite observations showed a dominate downward Poynting flux for most cases in the cusp region. Our analysis of DMSP F15 data for five years (2000–2004) reveals that approximately 53% of 660 cusp crossings at 800–850 km showed strong downward Poynting flux (S > 10 mW/m2), 32% of the crossings had noticeable downward Poynting flux (S > 3 mW/m2), and 7% of the crossings did not show clear Poynting flux (S < 1 mW/m2). Only 13 out of 660 cusp crossings (~2%) showed noticeable upward Poynting flux. In the LLBL region, 35% of 11,641 LLBL crossings showed significant downward Poynting flux, 34% of the crossings had noticeable downward Poynting flux, and only 13% of the crossings did not show clear Poynting flux. On average, Poynting flux in LLBL is smaller than that in the cusp. The results show a slightly negative correlation between Poynting flux and particle precipitation energy flux in the dayside polar cap boundary regions. Statistically, Poynting flux in the cusp is enhanced during interplanetary magnetic field By positive conditions.

Particle Precipitation Effects on Convection and the Magnetic Reconnection Rate in Earth's Magnetosphere

AbstractWe investigate the connection between particle precipitation in the ionosphere to both the subsolar distance of the magnetopause and the reconnection rate using the OpenGGCM‐CTIM‐RCM model. We simulated two events, a calm period on 4 May 2005 and a storm period on 17 March 2013. We find that scaling the precipitation energy flux by several orders of magnitude, conductivities in the auroral oval are influenced which, in turn, influence the cross polar cap potentials. With the change in conductance, magnetospheric convection is enhanced or reduced, and the location of the subsolar distance of the magnetopause can change by up to one RE. The investigation of the reconnection rate for the varying precipitation simulations using the Hesse‐Forbes‐Bern method shows that particle precipitation affects the magnetic reconnection rate in these two events. The most notable differences, up to 40%, occur on short time scales, that is, hours. A relation for longer time scales (tens of hours) between precipitation and reconnection for these two events is more difficult to ascertain. Differences in cross polar cap potential (CPCP) and R can be explained by viscous interactions and polar cap saturation. We find that when precipitation was decreased, resulting in low polar conductance, viscous interactions are strong and CPCP is higher than R. For high precipitation, high conductance cases the polar cap is in the saturation regime and CPCP is lower than R. We find hemispheric asymmetries in the cross polar cap potential and in the calculated reconnection rate derived from the Northern and Southern Hemispheres.

The Mars diffuse aurora: A model of ultraviolet and visible emissions

A new type of Martian aurora, characterized by an extended spatial distribution, an altitude lower than the discrete aurora and electron precipitation up to 200keV has been observed following solar activity on several occasions from the MAVEN spacecraft. We describe the results of Monte Carlo simulations of the production of several ultraviolet and violet auroral emissions for initial electron energies extending from 0.25 to 200keV. These include the CO2+ ultraviolet doublet (UVD) at 288.3 and 289.6nm and the Fox–Duffendack–Barker (FDB) bands, CO Cameron and Fourth Positive bands, OI 130.4 and 297.2nm and CI 156.1nm and 165.7nm multiplets. We calculate the nadir and limb production rates of several of these emissions for a unit precipitated energy flux. Our results indicate that electrons in the range 50–200keV produce maximum CO2+ UVD emission below 75km, in agreement with the MAVEN observations. We calculate the efficiency of photon production per unit precipitated electron power. The strongest emissions are the CO2+ FDB, UVD and CO Cameron bands and the oxygen emission at 297.2nm. The metastable a 3Π state which radiates the Cameron bands is deactivated by collisions below about 110km. As a consequence, we show that the Cameron band emission is expected to peak at a higher altitude than the CO2+ UVD and FDB bands. Collisional quenching also causes the intensity ratio of the CO2+ UVD to CO Cameron bands to increase below ∼100km in the energetic diffuse aurora.

A new ionospheric electron precipitation module coupled with RAM‐SCB within the geospace general circulation model

AbstractElectron precipitation down to the atmosphere due to wave‐particle scattering in the magnetosphere contributes significantly to the auroral ionospheric conductivity. In order to obtain the auroral conductivity in global MHD models that are incapable of capturing kinetic physics in the magnetosphere, MHD parameters are often used to estimate electron precipitation flux for the conductivity calculation. Such an MHD approach, however, lacks self‐consistency in representing the magnetosphere‐ionosphere coupling processes. In this study we improve the coupling processes in global models with a more physical method. We calculate the physics‐based electron precipitation from the ring current and map it to the ionospheric altitude for solving the ionospheric electrodynamics. In particular, we use the BATS‐R‐US (Block Adaptive Tree Scheme‐Roe type‐Upstream) MHD model coupled with the kinetic ring current model RAM‐SCB (Ring current‐Atmosphere interaction Model with Self‐Consistent Magnetic field (B)) that solves pitch angle‐dependent electron distribution functions, to study the global circulation dynamics during the 25–26 January 2013 storm event. Since the electron precipitation loss is mostly governed by wave‐particle resonant scattering in the magnetosphere, we further investigate two loss methods of specifying electron precipitation loss associated with wave‐particle interactions: (1) using pitch angle diffusion coefficients Dαα(E,α) determined from the quasi‐linear theory, with wave spectral and plasma density obtained from statistical observations (named as “diffusion coefficient method”) and (2) using electron lifetimes τ(E) independent on pitch angles inferred from the above diffusion coefficients (named as “lifetime method”). We found that both loss methods demonstrate similar temporal evolution of the trapped ring current electrons, indicating that the impact of using different kinds of loss rates is small on the trapped electron population. However, for the precipitated electrons, the lifetime method hardly captures any precipitation in the large L shell (i.e., 4 < L < 6.5) region, while the diffusion coefficient method produces much better agreement with NOAA/POES measurements, including the spatial distribution and temporal evolution of electron precipitation in the region from the premidnight through the dawn to the dayside. Further comparisons of the precipitation energy flux to DMSP observations indicates that the new physics‐based precipitation approach using diffusion coefficients for the ring current electron loss can explain the diffuse electron precipitation in the dawn sector, such as the enhanced precipitation flux at auroral latitudes and flux drop near the subauroral latitudes, but the traditional MHD approach largely overestimates the precipitation flux at lower latitudes.

Electron precipitation models in global magnetosphere simulations

AbstractGeneral methods for improving the specification of electron precipitation in global simulations are described and implemented in the Lyon‐Fedder‐Mobarry (LFM) global simulation model, and the quality of its predictions for precipitation is assessed. LFM's existing diffuse and monoenergetic electron precipitation models are improved, and new models are developed for lower energy, broadband, and direct‐entry cusp precipitation. The LFM simulation results for combined diffuse plus monoenergetic electron precipitation exhibit a quadratic increase in the hemispheric precipitation power as the intensity of solar wind driving increases, in contrast with the prediction from the OVATION Prime (OP) 2010 empirical precipitation model which increases linearly with driving intensity. Broadband precipitation power increases approximately linearly with driving intensity in both models. Comparisons of LFM and OP predictions with estimates of precipitating power derived from inversions of Polar satellite UVI images during a double substorm event (28–29 March 1998) show that the LFM peak precipitating power is >4× larger when using the improved precipitation model and most closely tracks the larger of three different inversion estimates. The OP prediction most closely tracks the double peaks in the intermediate inversion estimate, but it overestimates the precipitating power between the two substorms by a factor >2 relative to all other estimates. LFMs polar pattern of precipitating energy flux tracks that of OP for broadband precipitation exhibits good correlation with duskside region 1 currents for monoenergetic energy flux that OP misses and fails to produce sufficient diffuse precipitation power in the prenoon quadrant that is present in OP. The prenoon deficiency is most likely due to the absence of drift kinetic physics in the LFM simulation.