Previsit Questionnaire Research Articles

Using patient-reported performance status to guide management of advanced cancer: A quality improvement initiative.

379 Background: Performance status is a key prognostic factor among patients with advanced cancer and can inform the need for supportive care services. However, assessment and documentation of performance status is inconsistently integrated into standard oncology care. Patient-reported performance status (PRPS) is a surrogate for clinician-assessed performance status and has the potential to address this challenge. We piloted a decision support tool in our electronic health record (EHR) that uses PRPS to prompt clinician assessment of performance status and suggest referrals to supportive care services. Methods: We identified patients with advanced cancer using a pre-built and validated registry driven by ICD codes in our EHR (EPIC). For patients with advanced cancer seen at one of our clinics, a multiple-choice question with options derived from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale in patient-friendly language was added to the pre-visit questionnaire sent electronically prior to oncology visits. For patients with a poor PRPS (2 or greater), a clinical decision support tool alerted providers of the patient’s self-reported performance status, encouraged input of the clinician’s ECOG assessment, and suggested referral orders to supportive care services such as palliative care, nutrition, and social work. We are currently evaluating how our PRPS-driven decision support tool impacts the rate of clinician-assessed ECOG documentation, referral rates, and clinical outcomes. Results: Between 3/13/24 and 5/13/24, of 336 patients identified by the advanced cancer registry, 70% (235) of patients completed the PRPS questionnaire. Among patients with an available PRPS score, 18% (42) of patients reported a poor performance status (2 or greater) at least once, triggering the decision support tool. Providers entered ECOG assessments for 93% (39) of patients and sent referrals to supportive care services for 10% (4) of the patients. Three patients died during this time period, and all three of them reported a poor performance status of 3 or 4. Oncologists at the clinic reported no significant disruption to routine workflow. Conclusions: Preliminary results suggest feasibility of a PRPS-driven decision support tool to flag patients with advanced cancer and declining function and improve discrete documentation of clinician-assessed performance status. Notably, the rate of referrals to supportive care services remains low. Next steps include obtaining longitudinal data from this pilot, assessing the impact of the pilot on goals of care documentation, and validating the concordance of PRPS and ECOG and their effect on clinical outcomes. Ultimately, we aim to use the resulting data and harness our dashboard of patients with advanced cancer and poor performance status to develop innovative, automated, and targeted quality improvement interventions.

Using a Previsit Questionnaire for Initial Visits in a Pediatric Mitochondrial Clinic: Perspectives of Parents, a Specialty Physician, and a Clinical Coordinator.

Objective: In this study, we assessed the usefulness of a previsit questionnaire for children who were referred for an initial evaluation in a mitochondrial subspecialty clinic. We explored the themes regarding parent's questions, concerns, and goals. We aimed to add to existing knowledge about the usefulness of previsit questionnaires in a pediatric specialty setting from the perspective of parents, the specialist, and the clinical coordinator. Method: We enrolled 25 patients and their parent(s) over 25 months. Questionnaires were completed by the parent(s), the clinical coordinator, and the mitochondrial specialist. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to summarize results. Results: Parental responses suggested that they are most concerned about their child's clinical problems, communication, language and developmental delays, disease progression and prognosis, understanding mitochondrial disease, quality of life, and physical challenges including muscle and energy problems. Parents felt the previsit questionnaire was very helpful for both the doctor and for themselves to be prepared for their visit. The specialist and the clinical coordinator also found it to be helpful. Parental comments suggested that they felt that writing down the story of their child's life was helpful for the provider, allowed time for reflection, and improved the appointment experience. Some felt it was a difficult or redundant activity. Conclusion: Parents were often pleased to complete the previsit questionnaire. This allowed them to highlight concerns and share information that they wanted the care team to know about their child. We revised the tool based on feedback from parents and the specialist and will continue to use it in our clinic.

Leveraging an Electronic Health Record Patient Portal to Help Patients Formulate Their Health Care Goals: Mixed Methods Evaluation of Pilot Interventions.

Persons with multiple chronic conditions face complex medical regimens and clinicians may not focus on what matters most to these patients who vary widely in their health priorities. Patient Priorities Care is a facilitator-led process designed to identify patients' priorities and align decision-making and care, but the need for a facilitator has limited its widespread adoption. The aims of this study are to design and test mechanisms for patients to complete a self-directed process for identifying priorities and providing their priorities to clinicians. The study involved patients of at least 65 years of age at 2 family medicine practices with 5 physicians each. We first tested 2 versions of an interactive website and asked patients to bring their results to their visit. We then tested an Epic previsit questionnaire derived from the website's questions and included standard previsit materials. We completed postintervention phone interviews and an online survey with participating patients and collected informal feedback and conducted a focus group with participating physicians. In the test of the first website version, 17.3% (35/202) of invited patients went to the website, 11.4% (23/202) completed all of the questions, 2.5% (5/202) brought results to their visits, and the median session time was 43.0 (IQR 28.0) minutes. Patients expressed confusion about bringing results to the visit. After clarifying that issue in the second version, 15.1% (32/212) of patients went to the website, 14.6% (31/212) completed the questions, 1.9% (4/212) brought results to the visit, and the median session time was 35.0 (IQR 35.0) minutes. In the test of the Epic questionnaire, 26.4% (198/750) of patients completed the questionnaire before at least 1 visit, and the median completion time was 14.0 (IQR 23.0) minutes. The 8 main questions were answered 62.9% (129/205) to 95.6% (196/205) of the time. Patients who completed questionnaires were younger than those who did not (72.3 vs 76.1 years) and were more likely to complete at least 1 of their other assigned questionnaires (99.5%, 197/198) than those who did not (10.3%, 57/552). A total of 140 of 198 (70.7%) patients responded to a survey, and 86 remembered completing the questionnaire; 78 (90.7%) did not remember having difficulty answering the questions and 57 (68.7%) agreed or somewhat agreed that it helped them and their clinicians to understand their priorities. Doctors noted that the sickest patients did not complete the questionnaire and that the discussion provided a good segue into end-of-life care. Embedding questionnaires assaying patient priorities into patient portals holds promise for expanding access to priorities-concordant care.

Pain Self-Efficacy Can Improve During a Visit With an Orthopedic Surgeon.

Greater pain self-efficacy (PSE) is associated with reduced pain, fewer limitations, and increased quality of life after treatment for orthopedic conditions. The aims of this study were to (1) assess if PSE improves during a visit with an orthopedic surgeon and (2) identify modifiable visit factors that are associated with an increase in PSE. We performed a prospective observational study of orthopedic clinic visits at a multispecialty clinic from February to May 2022. New patients who presented to one of six orthopedic surgeons were approached for the study. Patients who provided consent completed a pre-visit questionnaire including the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) and demographic questions. A trained research member recorded the five-item Observing Patient Involvement in Decision Making Instrument (OPTION-5) score, number of questions asked, and visit duration. Immediately after the visit, patients completed a post-visit questionnaire consisting of the PSEQ and Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS). Of 132 patients enrolled, 61 (46%) had improved PSE after the orthopedic visit, with 38 (29%) having improvement above a clinically significant threshold. There were no significant differences between patients with increased PSE and those without increased PSE when comparing the PICS, OPTION-5, questions asked, or visit duration. Almost half of the patients had improvement in PSE during an orthopedic visit. The causal pathway to how to improve PSE and the durability of the improved PSE have implications in strategies to improve patient outcomes in orthopedic surgery, such as communication methods and shared decision-making. Future research can focus on studying different interventions that facilitate improving PSE. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(4):e197-e203.].

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: Design, Implementation, and Pilot Results

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) offer a collaborative opportunity between the patient and the care team to improve the quality of care. Objectives: To define PROMs in patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), a pre-visit questionnaire (PVQ) was developed, which included a single agenda-setting question, the PROMIS-29 survey, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer (DT). Study Design: Patients completed the PVQ 1 month prior to transplant (baseline) and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months following transplant. Results: Sixty-five patients (n = 27 allogenic; n = 38 autologous) participated. Survey completion rates were 95% at 1 month post-transplant, 74% at 6 months, and 65% at one year. One month following transplant, patients’ fatigue (P < .001) increased, while physical (P < .001) and social (P < .001) functions decreased. Each returned to baseline at 3 months (P < .001). Fatigue was more pronounced in allogeneic recipients (P = .017) and autologous recipients recovered physical function much sooner (P = .021). Conclusions: This study confirms the feasibility of capturing PROMs longitudinally in patients receiving HSCT and demonstrates significant changes in fatigue and physical and social functioning following transplant.

Development of an Automated Triage System for Longstanding Dizzy Patients Using Artificial Intelligence.

To report the first steps of a project to automate and optimize scheduling of multidisciplinary consultations for patients with longstanding dizziness utilizing artificial intelligence. Retrospective case review. Quaternary referral center. A previsit self-report questionnaire was developed to query patients about their complaints of longstanding dizziness. We convened an expert panel of clinicians to review diagnostic outcomes for 98 patients and used a consensus approach to retrospectively determine what would have been the ideal appointments based on the patient's final diagnoses. These results were then compared retrospectively to the actual patient schedules. From these data, a machine learning algorithm was trained and validated to automate the triage process. Compared with the ideal itineraries determined retrospectively with our expert panel, visits scheduled by the triage clinicians showed a mean concordance of 70%, and our machine learning algorithm triage showed a mean concordance of 79%. Manual triage by clinicians for dizzy patients is a time-consuming and costly process. The formulated first-generation automated triage algorithm achieved similar results to clinicians when triaging dizzy patients using data obtained directly from an online previsit questionnaire.

Acceptability and Feasibility of Delivering Decision Aids to Veterans for Management of Knee Osteoarthritis - A Pilot Study.

Decision aids are effective tools in facilitating patient-centered care and patient involvement in the decision-making process. Given unique barriers to providing patient-centered care for Veterans, implementation of decision aids may improve overall quality of care. We aimed to assess the acceptability and feasibility of video-based and pamphlet-based decision aid use in Veterans with knee osteoarthritis. Veterans considering treatment for knee osteoarthritis received either an online video-based aid, pamphlet-based aid, or both before their surgical consult. At their visit, patients completed written pre-visit and post-visit questionnaires. The pre-visit questionnaire included questions about the patient's demographics, decision-making preferences, experiences using the assigned decision aids, and the Hip-Knee Decision Quality Instrument. The post-visit questionnaire assessed the patient's overall experience with the decision-making process and how use of the decision aid influenced their discussion with the physician. All 16 patients who received the pamphlet-based aid reviewed the decision aid before their visit, compared to only five of the 12 patients who received the video-based aid. Thirteen of 20 patients indicated that they preferred to share treatment decision-making with their physician. Seventeen of 20 patients believed they would feel comfortable questioning the treatment recommendation of their surgeon after decision aid use. Most patients reported a positive experience using their decision aid, regardless of modality, and found it easily comprehensible and useful in visit preparation. A preference for a pamphlet-based aid was expressed by the majority of patients. Veterans considering treatment for knee osteoarthritis are well prepared to engage in a patient-centered care experience. Most patients preferred sharing the decision-making process with their physician and felt comfortable questioning them about treatment recommendations. Decision aids helped Veterans feel more informed about their treatment options and improved engagement and discussion with their physician. Pamphlet-based aids were utilized more reliably than video-based aids.

Enhancing Care Partnerships Using a Rheumatology Dashboard: Bringing Together What Matters Most to Both Patients and Clinicians.

Dashboards can support person-centered care by helping people partner with their clinicians to coproduce care based on preferences, shared decision-making, and evidence-based treatments. We engaged caregivers of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and clinicians in a pilot study to assess their experiences and the utility and impact of an electronic previsit questionnaire and point-of-care dashboard to support coproduction of rheumatology care. We employed a mixed-methods design to assess users' perceptions of a customized electronic health record rheumatology module at four pediatric rheumatology practices and two adult rheumatology practices. We surveyed a convenience sample of caregivers of children with JIA (n=113), adults with RA (n=116), and clinicians (n=12). We conducted semistructured interviews with 13 caregivers and patients and six care teams. Experiences were evaluated using descriptive statistics and thematic analyses. Caregivers of children with JIA and adults with RA reported the dashboards were useful during discussions (88%) and helped them talk about what mattered most (82%), make health care decisions (83%), and create a treatment plan (77%). Clinicians provided similar feedback. Two-thirds (67%) of caregivers and adults and 55% of clinicians would recommend the dashboard to peers. System usability scores (77.1 ± 15.6) were above average. Dashboards helped users make sense of health information, communicate more effectively, and make decisions. Improvements to the dashboards and workflows could enhance patient self-management and clinician efficiency. Visual point-of-care dashboards can support caregivers, patients, and clinicians to coproduce rheumatology care. Findings demonstrate a need to spread and scale for broader benefit and impact.

Optimizing virtual visits and reducing inbox messages using a pre-visit questionnaire: A quality improvement project

Optimizing virtual visits and reducing inbox messages using a pre-visit questionnaire: A quality improvement project

Providers’ shared decision-making as a predictor of healthcare outcomes for college-aged adults managing upper respiratory tract infections

ObjectivesStrategies that assist patients with upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) to endorse non-antibiotic treatments are vital to curbing antibiotic resistance. This study examines the potential of shared decision-making (SDM) for improving stewardship-relevant outcomes and investigates patient affect as a mechanism that explains the beneficial impact of perceived SDM. MethodPatients (N = 433) seeking care for URTIs at a university student health center and not prescribed antibiotics completed a pre-visit questionnaire and two surveys one day and 14 days post-visit. The day-one survey assessed perceived SDM, affect, and immediate stewardship-relevant outcomes, and the day-14 survey assessed long-term stewardship-relevant outcomes. ResultsPerceived SDM was negatively associated with negative affect and positively associated with positive affect, favorable perceptions of non-antibiotic treatments and providers, and self-efficacy to manage symptoms and obtain follow-up care. Patient affect and day-one outcomes were mediators between perceived SDM and retrospective self-efficacy two weeks post-visit. ConclusionThe study illustrated the beneficial influence of patient perceived SDM on antibiotic stewardship in both short and long terms and elucidated the mechanisms through which the influence occurs. Practice implicationsSDM can be an effective strategy for primary care providers to improve patients’ outcomes with URTI visits without prescribing unwarranted antibiotics.

Effect of Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support on Contextualization of Care

Contextualizing care is a process of incorporating information about the life circumstances and behavior of individual patients, termed contextual factors, into their plan of care. In 4 steps, clinicians recognize clues (termed contextual red flags), clinicians ask about them (probe for context), patients disclose contextual factors, and clinicians adapt care accordingly. The process is associated with a desired outcome resolution of the presenting contextual red flag. To determine whether contextualized clinical decision support (CDS) tools in the electronic health record (EHR) improve clinician contextual probing, attention to contextual factors in care planning, and the presentation of contextual red flags. This randomized clinical trial was performed at the primary care clinics of 2 academic medical centers with different EHR systems. Participants were adults 18 years or older consenting to audio record their visits and their physicians between September 6, 2018, and March 4, 2021. Patients were randomized to an intervention or a control group. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Patients completed a previsit questionnaire that elicited contextual red flags and factors and appeared in the clinician's note template in a contextual care box. The EHR also culled red flags from the medical record, included them in the contextual care box, used passive and interruptive alerts, and proposed relevant orders. Proportion of contextual red flags noted at the index visit that resolved 6 months later (primary outcome), proportion of red flags probed (secondary outcome), and proportion of contextual factors addressed in the care plan by clinicians (secondary outcome), adjusted for study site and for multiple red flags and factors within a visit. Four hundred fifty-two patients (291 women [65.1%]; mean [SD] age, 55.6 [15.1] years) completed encounters with 39 clinicians (23 women [59.0%]). Contextual red flags were not more likely to resolve in the intervention vs control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.96 [95% CI, 0.57-1.63]). However, the intervention increased both contextual probing (aOR, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.14-3.93]) and contextualization of the care plan (aOR, 2.67 [95% CI, 1.32-5.41]), controlling for whether a factor was identified by probing or otherwise. Across study groups, contextualized care plans were more likely than noncontextualized plans to result in improvement in the presenting red flag (aOR, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.38-3.28]). This randomized clinical trial found that contextualized CDS did not improve patients' outcomes but did increase contextualization of their care, suggesting that use of this technology could ultimately help improve outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03244033.

Pandemic intake questionnaire to improve quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of outpatient neurologic and developmental care at the Kennedy Krieger institute during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic uniquely affects patients with neurologic and developmental disabilities at the Kennedy Krieger Institute. These patients are at increased risk of co-morbidities, increasing their risk of contracting COVID-19. Disruptions in their home and school routines, and restrictions accessing crucial healthcare services has had a significant impact.MethodsA Pandemic Intake questionnaire regarding COVID-19 related medical concerns of guardians of patients was distributed using Qualtrics. Data from May-December 2020 were merged with demographic information of patients from 10 clinics (Center for Autism and Related Disorders (CARD), Neurology, Epigenetics, Neurogenetics, Center for Development and Learning (CDL) Sickle Cell, Spinal Cord, Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS), Tourette's, and Metabolism). A provider feedback survey was distributed to program directors to assess the effectiveness of this intervention.ResultsAnalysis included responses from 1643 guardians of pediatric patients (mean age 9.5 years, range 0–21.6 years). Guardians of patients in more medically complicated clinics reported perceived increased risk of COVID-19 (p < 0.001) and inability to obtain therapies (p < 0.001) and surgeries (p < 0.001). Guardian responses from CARD had increased reports of worsening behavior (p = 0.01). Providers increased availability of in-person and virtual therapies and visits and made referrals for additional care to address this. In a survey of medical providers, five out of six program directors who received the responses to this survey found this questionnaire helpful in caring for their patients.ConclusionThis quality improvement project successfully implemented a pre-visit questionnaire to quickly assess areas of impact of COVID-19 on patients with neurodevelopmental disorders. During the pandemic, results identified several major areas of impact, including patient populations at increased risk for behavioral changes, sleep and/or disruptions of medical care. Most program directors reported improved patient care as a result.

Children after uterus transplantation: 2-year outcomes from the Dallas UtErus Transplant Study (DUETS).

To describe outcomes in the first 2 years of life for the children born in the Dallas UtErus Transplant Study. Cohort study comprising all live births from uterus transplantation at a single centre. Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. A total of 14 children from 12 uterus transplantation recipients. Retrospective review of data through 2 years of life. Information on children's development was collected based on the Bright Futures Guideline and the Bright Futures Previsit Questionnaire. Primary outcomes were anthropometric measures (children's body length, weight, head circumference), neurological status, cognitive status and physical development at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months of age. The median gestational age at delivery was 36+6 weeks, with a median birthweight of 2940 g. Follow-up data were available for 13 offspring. Physical and neurological developmental milestones were met and were age appropriate in all children within the first 24 months. General health was good, and no abnormalities in immune development were found. Cognitive deviations were only mild and temporary and improved with interventions. The children's growth and physical, neurological and cognitive development were age appropriate within the first 2 years of life. To confirm these outcomes, further data should be collected in collaboration with other centres.

Clinical Use of an Electronic Pre-Visit Questionnaire Soliciting Patient Visit Goals and Interim History: A Retrospective Comparison Between Safety-net and Non-Safety-net Clinics.

Introduction/ObjectivesWe examined an initial step towards co-generation of clinic notes by inviting patients to complete a pre-visit questionnaire that could be inserted into clinic notes by providers and describe the experience in a safety-net and non-safety-net clinic.MethodsWe sent an electronic pre-visit questionnaire on visit goals and interim history to patients at a safety-net clinic and a non-safety-net clinic before clinic visits. We compared questionnaire utilization between clinics during a one-year period and performed a chart review of a sample of patients to examine demographics, content and usage of patient responses to the questionnaire.ResultsWhile use was low in both clinics, it was lower in the safety-net clinic (3%) compared to the non-safety-net clinic (10%). We reviewed a sample of respondents and found they were more likely to be White compared to the overall clinic populations (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in patient-typed notes (word count and number of visit goals) between the safety-net and non-safety-net samples however, patients at the safety-net clinic were less likely to have all of their goals addressed within the PCP documentation, compared to the non-safety-net clinic.ConclusionsGiven potential benefits of this questionnaire as a communication tool, addressing barriers to use of technology among vulnerable patients is needed, including access to devices and internet, and support from caregivers or culturally concordant peer navigators.

Implementation of Patient Engagement Tools in Electronic Health Records to Enhance Patient-Centered Communication: Protocol for Feasibility Evaluation and Preliminary Results.

BackgroundPatient–physician communication during clinical encounters is essential to ensure quality of care. Many studies have attempted to improve patient–physician communication. Incorporating patient priorities into agenda setting and medical decision-making are fundamental to patient-centered communication. Efficient and scalable approaches are needed to empower patients to speak up and prepare physicians to respond. Leveraging electronic health records (EHRs) in engaging patients and health care teams has the potential to enhance the integration of patient priorities in clinical encounters. A systematic approach to eliciting and documenting patient priorities before encounters could facilitate effective communication in such encounters.ObjectiveIn this paper, we report the design and implementation of a set of EHR tools built into clinical workflows for facilitating patient–physician joint agenda setting and the documentation of patient concerns in the EHRs for ambulatory encounters.MethodsWe engaged health information technology leaders and users in three health care systems for developing and implementing a set of EHR tools. The goal of these tools is to standardize the elicitation of patient priorities by using a previsit “patient important issue” questionnaire distributed through the patient portal to the EHR. We built additional EHR documentation tools to facilitate patient–staff communication when the staff records the vital signs and the reason for the visit in the EHR while in the examination room, with a simple transmission method for physicians to incorporate patient concerns in EHR notes.ResultsThe study is ongoing. The anticipated completion date for survey data collection is November 2021. A total of 34,037 primary care patients from three health systems (n=26,441; n=5136; and n=2460 separately recruited from each system) used the previsit patient important issue questionnaire in 2020. The adoption of the digital previsit questionnaire during the COVID-19 pandemic was much higher in one health care system because it expanded the use of the questionnaire from physicians participating in trials to all primary care providers midway through the year. It also required the use of this previsit questionnaire for eCheck-ins, which are required for telehealth encounters. Physicians and staff suggested anecdotally that this questionnaire helped patient–clinician communication, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic.ConclusionsEHR tools have the potential to facilitate the integration of patient priorities into agenda setting and documentation in real-world primary care practices. Early results suggest the feasibility and acceptability of such digital tools in three health systems. EHR tools can support patient engagement and clinicians’ work during in-person and telehealth visits. They could potentially exert a sustained influence on patient and clinician communication behaviors in contrast to prior ad hoc educational efforts targeting patients or clinicians.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03385512; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03385512International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)DERR1-10.2196/30431

International Adoption: A Review and Update.

1. Judith Kim Eckerle, MD*,† 2. Megan Marie Bresnahan, OTR/L† 3. Maria Kroupina, PhD, LP*,† 4. Dana Ernest Johnson, MD, PhD*,† 5. Cynthia Ruth Howard, MD, MPHTM*,† 1. *Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 2. †MHealth Fairview University of Minnesota Masonic Children’s Hospital, Minneapolis, MN * Abbreviations: Ab : : antibody ACE : : adverse childhood experience CDC : : Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CXR : : chest radiography IA : : international adoptee TB : : tuberculosis 1. Key information for accurate assessment of the preadoption referral. 2. Determining immunization status and planning catch-up strategy. 3. Updated screening protocol for and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. 4. Evaluation of developmental delays in the context of international adoption. 5. Screening for risk factors indicating the need for referral to child mental health and developmental specialists. After completing this article, readers should be able to: 1. Review the basic components of an adoption referral file and know when to consult an international adoption medicine expert. 2. Perform the initial medical assessment of a newly arrived international adoptee, including evaluation of the efficacy of previous immunizations and planning of catch-up immunization based on new recommendations. 3. Screen for tuberculosis and treat latent tuberculosis infection based on recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. 4. Understand the multiple areas of a developmental baseline of adopted children and assess for catch-up needs. 5. Identify the child with multiple risk factors and/or parental or family stressors who needs a referral to an adoption-competent mental health specialist. Although interest in intercountry adoption continues to be high, the numbers of international adoptions have changed dramatically since the peak in 2004 when 45,483 international adoptees (IAs) were placed in families worldwide. By 2017, the number dropped 79% to 9,387. In the United …

Improving contraceptive use among Latina adolescents: A cluster-randomized controlled trial evaluating an mHealth application, Health-E You/Salud iTu

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of Health-E You/Salud iTu, a mobile health application (app), on increasing knowledge, self-efficacy and contraception use among Latina adolescents, its impact on visit quality, and app satisfaction. Study DesignThis study used cluster-randomized controlled trial (CRCT) of 18 school-based health centers (SBHCs). Prior to the visit, intervention participants received the patient-centered contraceptive decision-making support app and controls answered sexual health questions on iPads. Participants completed a previsit questionnaire and 3 follow-up surveys (48 hours, 3-, and 6-months) after the recruitment visit (where intervention participants completed the app). Differences in adolescents’ contraceptive knowledge, self-efficacy, and use over the 6-month follow-up were assessed by generalized mixed effects regression models. ResultsA total of 1,360 Latina adolescents participated; 57.2% responded to the 48-hour survey, 50.1% to the 3-month, 49.7% to the 6-month, and 42.3% to both the 3- and 6-month surveys. Health-E You users’ demonstrated significant increases in pre-post knowledge (p < 0.001). Intervention participants who completed the follow-up survey reported greater increases in mean self-efficacy from baseline (23.2 intervention vs. 22.5 controls) to 6 months (26.1 vs. 23.4; b = 1.58, 95% CI 0.38–2.77, p = 0.01), and greater increases in non-barrier contraceptive use from baseline (29% intervention vs. 30% controls) to 3 months (63% vs. 45%; OR = 3.29, 95% CI 1.04–10.36, p = 0.04) and 6 months (63% vs. 44%; OR = 5.54, 95% CI 1.70–18.06, p = 0.005). Providers and adolescents reported high app satisfaction and stated it improved visit quality. ConclusionsWhile data suggest that Health-E You improved outcomes, findings must be interpreted cautiously. Intervention participants had higher baseline sexual activity rates, more recruitment visits for pregnancy testing, emergency contraception or birth control, and lower completion rates of follow-up surveys than controls. ImplicationsDespite declines in adolescent pregnancy in the United States, Latinas continue to have disproportionately high rates compared to white females. The Health-E You app may be an effective support tool for both adolescents and providers in SBHCs, and possibly other clinical settings, across the country to increase contraceptive use and thereby decrease unintended pregnancies. It could potentially reduce disparities in adolescent pregnancies and create more efficient visit time spent between clients and their providers.

Screening for Gender Identity in Adolescent Well Visits: Is It Feasible and Acceptable?

PurposeThis study aimed to pilot systematic gender identity screening during adolescent well checks and examine perceptions of feasibility and acceptability of screening from adolescents, parents/guardians, and clinicians. MethodsAdolescents aged 12–18 years with a well visit between July 1, 2018, and June 30, 2019 (n = 134,114; 817 pilot and 133,297 usual care) in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) pediatric primary care clinics. “What is your gender?” was added to the previsit questionnaire in pilot clinics; all other KPNC clinics provided usual care. Additional anonymous surveys were administered to adolescents and parents/guardians in the pilot clinics and to all KPNC pediatric clinicians. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations between clinics and patients reporting as transgender and gender diverse (TGD). Descriptive statistics summarized patient, parent/guardian, and clinician perceptions of gender identity screening. ResultsAdjusting for age and race/ethnicity, adolescents had higher odds of reporting as TGD in pilot clinics than in usual care (odds ratio = 6.91, 95% confidence interval = 3.76–12.74). Two thirds of adolescents, 75.5% of parents/guardians, and 92.5% of clinicians felt it was important to screen for gender identity in primary care. Less than 2% of adolescents found the question confusing, offensive, or uncomfortable, and 2.8% of parents/guardians felt it was offensive. In addition, 36.4% of clinicians and 3.6% of parents/guardians were concerned it would affect visit workflow/time. ConclusionsMost adolescents, parents/guardians, and pediatric clinicians viewed systematic gender identity screening as both feasible and acceptable. Standardized gender identity screening during adolescent well checks could facilitate and increase identification of TGD adolescents and the delivery of gender-affirming care for adolescents and families in need.

Effect of a Mammography Screening Decision Aid for Women 75 Years and Older

Guidelines recommend that women 75 years and older be informed of the benefits and harms of mammography before screening. To test the effects of receipt of a paper-based mammography screening decision aid (DA) for women 75 years and older on their screening decisions. A cluster randomized clinical trial with clinician as the unit of randomization. All analyses were completed on an intent-to-treat basis. The setting was 11 primary care practices in Massachusetts or North Carolina. Of 1247 eligible women reached, 546 aged 75 to 89 years without breast cancer or dementia who had a mammogram within 24 months but not within 6 months and saw 1 of 137 clinicians (herein referred to as PCPs) from November 3, 2014, to January 26, 2017, participated. A research assistant (RA) administered a previsit questionnaire on each participant's health, breast cancer risk factors, sociodemographic characteristics, and screening intentions. After the visit, the RA administered a postvisit questionnaire on screening intentions and knowledge. Receipt of the DA (DA arm) or a home safety (HS) pamphlet (control arm) before a PCP visit. Participants were followed up for 18 months for receipt of mammography screening (primary outcome). To examine the effects of the DA, marginal logistic regression models were fit using generalized estimating equations to allow for clustering by PCP. Adjusted probabilities and risk differences were estimated to account for clustering by PCP. Of 546 women in the study, 283 (51.8%) received the DA. Patients in each arm were well matched; their mean (SD) age was 79.8 (3.7) years, 428 (78.4%) were non-Hispanic white, 321 (of 543 [59.1%]) had completed college, and 192 (35.2%) had less than a 10-year life expectancy. After 18 months, 9.1% (95% CI, 1.2%-16.9%) fewer women in the DA arm than in the control arm had undergone mammography screening (51.3% vs 60.4%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95; P = .006). Women in the DA arm were more likely than those in the control arm to rate their screening intentions lower from previsit to postvisit (69 of 283 [adjusted %, 24.5%] vs 47 of 263 [adjusted %, 15.3%]), to be more knowledgeable about the benefits and harms of screening (86 [adjusted %, 25.5%] vs 32 [adjusted %, 11.7%]), and to have a documented discussion about mammography with their PCP (146 [adjusted %, 47.4%] vs 111 [adjusted %, 38.9%]). Almost all women in the DA arm (94.9%) would recommend the DA. Providing women 75 years and older with a mammography screening DA before a PCP visit helps them make more informed screening decisions and leads to fewer women choosing to be screened, suggesting that the DA may help reduce overscreening. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02198690.

Physicians' Response to Patients' Quality-of-Life Goals.

Patients are able to participate in quality-of-life (QOL) discussions, but clinicians struggle to incorporate this information into encounters and shared decision making. We designed a study to determine if a clinician-initiated prompt could make patient visits more goal directed. Patients were given a previsit questionnaire that included QOL questions. Physicians in the control were given no further prompting. The intervention physicians were prompted to ask a QOL question: what things are you unable to do because of your health problems today? A 2-pronged design was used: 1 prepost group where 3 physicians participated in 5 control and 5 intervention encounters (n = 30) and a randomized group in which 11 physicians and their patients were randomly assigned to control or intervention groups (n = 30). Video recordings of the encounters were reviewed to determine if QOL goals were mentioned and if they were utilized in decision making. Fifty-seven (95%) of the 60 patients provided written answers to at least 1 of the QOL questions on the intake form. QOL goals were mentioned during intervention encounters more often than in control groups. QOL information was used in shared decision making in only 4 of the 30 (13%) intervention encounters. Physicians were able to engage in QOL discussions with their patients, but did not translate that information to medical decision making. More research is needed to understand why clinicians opt not to use QOL information and how to make communication more goal directed.