Pretransplant Measurable Residual Disease Research Articles

Prognostic impact of number of induction courses to attain complete remission in patients with acute myeloid leukemia transplanted with either a matched sibling or human leucocyte antigen 10/10 or 9/10 unrelated donor: An Acute Leukemia Working Party European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation study.

For the majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) an allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) in first complete remission (CR) is preferred. However, whether the number of courses required to achieve CR has a prognostic impact is unclear. It is unknown which factors remain important in patients requiring more than one course of induction to attain remission. This Acute Leukaemia Working Party study from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation identified adults who received an allograft in first CR from either a fully matched sibling or 10/10 or 9/10 human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-matched unrelated donor (HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DR, or HLA-DQ). Univariate and multivariate analyses were undertaken to identify the prognostic impact of one or two courses of induction to attain CR. A total of 4995 patients were included with 3839 (77%) patients attaining a CR following one course of induction chemotherapy (IND1), and 1116 patients requiring two courses (IND2) to attain CR. IND2 as compared to IND1 was a poor prognostic factor in a univariate analysis and remained so in a multivariate Cox model, resulting in an increased hazard ratio of relapse (1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.64; p=.0003) and of death (1.27; 95% CI, 1.09-1.47; p=.002). Adverse prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis of the outcomes of patients requiring IND2 included age, FLT3-ITD, adverse cytogenetics, and performance status. Pretransplant measurable residual disease retained a prognostic impact regardless of IND1 or IND2. Initial response to chemotherapy as determined by number of courses to attain CR, retained prognostic relevance even following SCT in CR.

Evaluation of the Impact of the Disease Risk Index and Pre-Transplant Measurable Residual Disease By Flow Cytometry As Prognostic Factors in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the therapy with the best curative potential for patients with intermediate/high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although many factors may influence the outcomes of allogeneic HSCT, risk stratification and disease status at the time of transplant are two of the strongest prognostic factors of post-transplant survival². In this context, the Disease Risk Index (DRI) was developed and validated in a cohort of more than 13.000 patients and stratifies patients into 4 groups with different overall survivals (OS)². Measurable residual disease (MRD) is also an important and consolidated biomarker for the prognosis, monitoring, and treatment effectiveness evaluation³. Objective: To compare the impact of the pre-transplant DRI and MRD in patients with AML in OS and leukemia-free survival of patients treated with allogeneic HSCT in a private institution in Brazil from January 2017 to May 2023. Methods: This is a retrospective, unicentric study. MRD was evaluated immediately before transplantation by 10-color flow cytometry and was considered positive if ≥0.1%. DRI was grouped into two groups: low/intermediate risk and high/very high risk. Statistical analyzes were performed using the Cox regression model. Results: With a median follow-up of 18 months, a total of 57 patients were included, 34 of whom had negative MRD and 23, positive. The mean ages in these groups were 55 and 60 years, respectively. HCT-CI was 0-2 in 91% of the patients in the MRD-negative group, and in 78% of the MRD-positive group. The type of donors was similar in both group (MRD positive or negative): 20-30% of related donors, 25-40% of haploidentical and 40-45% unrelated donors. The reduced-intensity conditioning regimen (RIC) was the used in 70% of the patients. In the MDR + group, peripheral stem cell source was more used than in the MDR negative group. In univariate analysis, DRI had an impact on overall survival (OS) with an HR=3.52 (95%CI 1.46 - 8.5) and p=0.075 for low/intermediate risk compared with high/very high risk, while in the multivariate analysis this impact was not maintained with HR=2.31 (95%CI 0.92 - 5.82) and p=0.075. A pre-transplant positive MRD was a risk factor for death in univariate analysis, with an HR=5.99 (95%CI 2.93- 26.82) and p<0.001. The impact of MRD HR 8.87 (2.93 - 26.83) and p < 0.001, age HR 1.09 (1.04 - 1.15) with p = 0.001 and bone marrow source HR 0.29 (0.08 - 1.06) are prognostic factors even when controlled for age, cell source and type of transplant. One-year overall survival in the MRD-negative group was 90% (79-100%), and 53% (36-80%) in the MRD-positive group. Additionally, one-year leukemia-free survival in the MRD-negative group was 70% (55-89%) and 45% (28-72%) in MRD-positive. Conclusion: Our results show that both DRI and pre-transplant MRD may have an impact on OS and LFS, although pre-transplant MRD seemed to perform better than DRI in multivariable analysis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Impact of Pre-Transplant Molecular and Cytogenetic Remission on Outcomes of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) carries a high relapse rate (~35% within 2 years) in patients (pts) with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Pre-transplant measurable residual disease (MRD) increases the risk of relapse and death in acute myeloid leukemia (Thol et al, Blood 2018). However, the impact of pre-transplant MRD on post-transplant outcomes is less clear in MDS. Prior studies have compared outcomes between myeloablative (MAC) and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) in pts with pre-transplant MRD persistence based on either cytogenetic remission alone or ultra-deep genomic sequencing with a limited 10-gene panel, suggesting reduced risk of relapse in pts receiving MAC (Festuccia et al, Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2016; Dillon et al, JCO PO 2021). However, pre-transplant MRD assessment using a commercial next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel in addition to cytogenetic testing to assess post-transplant outcomes has not been evaluated in MDS. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective review of MDS pts who underwent allo-SCT from 2015-2022. Pts with FISH/cytogenetic (FC) and/or molecular abnormalities at diagnosis and MRD assessment by commercial myeloid-panel NGS (with a variant-allele frequency detection limit up to 5%) and FC performed on peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) aspirate within 3 months prior to transplant were included for analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to estimate overall survival (OS). Gray's test/cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate relapse-free survival (RFS) with non-relapse mortality (NRM) as competing risk. Results: Table 1 includes baseline pt characteristics. Of 81 pts, 69 pts (85.2%) had residual FC and/or molecular abnormalities (MRD+) at pre-transplant PB/BM assessment. Twelve (14.8%) pts were in both FC and molecular remission (MRD-) prior to transplant. With a median follow-up of 13.9 months [IQR 6.8 - 38.9], 43 (53%) died and 24 (30%) pts experienced a relapse. Twenty-three of 69 (33%) MRD+ pts had relapsed disease with a 38% cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) at 2 years. In contrast, only 1/12 (8.3%) MRD- pts experienced a relapse after 7 years, with chromosomal loss of TP53 not present at initial diagnosis. CIR at 2 years was 33% and 41% (p=0.207) for MRD+ pts who received MAC vs RIC, respectively with NRM of 34.5% associated with MAC vs 28.2% for RIC (p=0.61). TP53 mutations were most frequently associated with relapse in 8/24 (33%) pts with a median OS of 9.8 months [8.2 - NR]. Besides the previously defined 10-gene panel (Dillon et al, JCO PO 2021), relapses were also driven by SRSF2, U2AF1, KRAS, SETBP1 and NF1 mutations present in the original clone. Six pts had DNMT3A, TET2 and/or ASXL1 (DTA) mutations only on pre-transplant NGS, with 2/6 pts relapsing without the re-emergence of DTA mutations. Median OS was not reached for MRD- pts and was 14.1 months [11.35-NR] for MRD+ pts, p = 0.061 [Fig.1]. OS probability at 2 years was 35% for MRD+ pts vs 75% for MRD- pts. Type of conditioning regimen, RIC vs MAC, did not impact OS (p= 0.6). An equal number of deaths, 35% each, were attributable to GvHD and relapse, respectively. Thirteen (30%) pts died from other causes, primarily infections and bleeding complications. NRM was 25% and 36% for MRD- and MRD+ cohorts, respectively. Pts received a median of 6 cycles [range, 2-36] of hypomethylating agent (HMA) +/- venetoclax prior to transplant with no association between the number of cycles and MRD status (p=0.80). The incidence of grade 3-4 acute GvHD and chronic GvHD requiring systemic therapy did not significantly differ, at 25% and 18.8% (p= 0.696) and 33.3% and 31.8% (p= 1.00) in MRD+ and MRD- pts, respectively. Conclusions: MRD assessment using commercially available NGS panels and cytogenetic testing that are routinely performed in MDS pts in real-world practice can predict risk of relapse. Pre-transplant MRD is associated with worse OS irrespective of the intensity of conditioning regimen. Although limited in statistical power due to a small sample size of MRD- pts in our cohort, further studies with a larger cohort are underway to better clarify the role of MRD on transplant outcomes in MDS. Our data also highlights that only a small minority of MDS pts (<15%) achieve complete molecular and cytogenetic remission at the time of transplant; strategies to eliminate the pre-transplant MDS clone are urgently needed.

Pre-Transplant Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) Detection of KMT2A-rearranged Acute Myeloid Leukemia Is Strongly Associated with Inferior Post-Transplant Outcome

Introduction KMT2A-rearranged ( KMT2Ar ) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with inferior survival and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) in first remission (CR1) is an important post-remission objective (Issa et al, Blood Cancer Journal 2021). Despite HCT, however, the relapse risk is ~50% (Menghrajani et al, Blood Adv. 2022). Several small cohort studies have described the prognostic utility of pre-HCT MRD assessment using real-time reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), but currently, this is not standard practice (Scholl et al, Haematologica 2005; Huang et al, Med Sci Monitor 2016; Liu et al, Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2014; Heuser et al, Blood 2021). A significant barrier to widespread implementation of KMT2A::X MRD monitoring is the presence of diverse fusion-partner genes and varied breakpoint regions. The potential to detect and pre-emptively target pre-HCT KMT2A::X MRD has relevance with the development of menin inhibitors, which have been shown to be active in the clinic (Issa et al, Nature 2023). In the current work, we report the prognostic impact of pre-HCT KMT2A::X MRD detection by RT-qPCR and the relationship with post-HCT outcome in adults with KMT2Ar AML. We also describe a novel 3 common primer/probe KMT2A::X reverse transcription digital PCR (RT-dPCR) MRD assay as a simplified dPCR alternative to MRD monitoring. Methods Archived pre-HCT cDNA were available from 54 patients treated in the UK (including UK NCRI AML17 and AML19) and Australia. Samples were analyzed by RT-qPCR using previously described methods in 45 patients (Abildgaard et al, Eur J Haematol. 2013), and RT-dPCR in 9 patients (Ivey, unpublished 2023). The RT-dPCR method, which uses a common 3 primer/probe set to capture breakpoints within KMT2A obviating the need for fusion-gene specific plasmid standards, showed high concordance with RT-qPCR across 20 samples (R 2=0.9915) . Copy numbers were expressed per 100 ABL copies. Assay sensitivity was ~0.001%. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for relapse-free survival (RFS, date of HCT to relapse or death from any cause) and overall survival (OS, date of HCT to death or last follow-up). Cox proportional hazards was used to assess variables impacting RFS and OS. Categorical variables were calculated using Fisher exact test and continuous variables using Mann-Whitney-U test. The study was approved by human research ethics committees (AUS 21/26; UK 14/WA/1056, NC10.13). Results A total of 54 patients with KMT2Ar AML underwent HCT between 2010-2022. Median age was 43 years (range, 17-70), 63% were female, 94% had de novo AML, all had received prior intensive chemotherapy and 76% were transplanted in CR1, 50% with myeloablative conditioning. KMT2A::X subtypes included t(9;11)/ KMT2A::MLLT3 in 35%, t(6;11)/ KMT2A::AFDN in 26%, t(11;19)/ KMT2A::ELL in 13% and KMT2A::MLLT1 in 5%, t(10;11)/ KMT2A::MLLT10 in 17% and other rare KMT2A::X variants in 4%. Pre-HCT MRD was detected (MRD-pos) in 46% of patients (25 of 54) at a median level of 0.3 copies/100ABL (range, 0.006-35.0394). The frequency of post-HCT relapse was significantly higher in patients with RT-qPCR/RT-dPCR levels ≥0.01% pre-HCT (68% relapsed vs 24% if MRD-neg, p=0.002) (Figure 1). Median time to relapse was 4.7 months (range, 0.8-22.5), with 100% of patients (22 of 22 with available molecular status at relapse) retaining the KMT2A::X variant at relapse. With median follow-up time of 37 months, pre-HCT KMT2A::X MRD-pos was associated with significantly inferior 2-year RFS (19% vs. 63%, p=0.0013) (Figure 2) and 2-year OS (47% vs. 69%, p=0.031). On univariate analysis, variables associated with inferior RFS were pre-HCT MRD-pos status (hazard ratio (HR) 3.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-6.9], p=0.002) and transplant in second remission vs. CR1 (HR 2.6 [95% CI 1.2-5.5], p=0.01), however, pre-HCT MRD-pos status was the only variable associated with inferior RFS on multivariate analysis (HR 2.8 [95% CI 1.3-6.1], p=0.01). Conclusions Pre-HCT KMT2A::X MRD detection by RT-qPCR and RT-dPCR is a robust prognostic indicator of post-transplant relapse and inferior survival outcome. Targeting patients with KMT2A::X MRD positive disease pre-HCT using novel menin inhibitors is currently the subject of an enrolling clinical trial (AMLM26 INTERCEPT) (ACTRN12621000439842).

Posttransplant MRD and T-cell chimerism status predict outcomes in patients who received allografts for AML/MDS.

Allogeneic stem-cell transplant allows for the delivery of curative graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplasia (AML/MDS). Surveillance of T-cell chimerism, measurable residual disease (MRD) and blast HLA-DR expression may inform whether GVL effectiveness is reduced. We report here the prognostic impact of these biomarkers in patients allografted for AML/MDS. One hundred eighty-seven patients from FIGARO, a randomized trial of reduced-intensity conditioning regimens in AML/MDS, were alive and relapse-free at the first MRD time-point and provided monitoring samples for flow cytometric MRD and T-cell chimerism, requested to month+12. Twenty-nine (15.5%) patients had at least 1 MRD-positive result posttransplant. MRD-positivity was associated with reduced overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 2.18; P= .0028) as a time-varying Cox variable and remained significant irrespective of pretransplant MRD status in multivariate analyses (P< .001). Ninety-four patients had sequential MRD with T-cell chimerism results at months+3/+6. Patients with full donor T-cell chimerism (FDTC) had an improved OS as compared with patients with mixed donor T-cell chimerism (MDTC) (adjusted HR=0.4; P=.0019). In patients with MDTC (month+3 or +6), MRD-positivity was associated with a decreased 2-year OS (34.3%) vs MRD-negativity (71.4%) (P= .001). In contrast, in the group with FDTC, MRD was infrequent and did not affect the outcome. Among patients with posttransplant MRD-positivity, decreased HLA-DR expression on blasts significantly reduced OS, supporting this as a mechanism for GVL escape. In conclusion, posttransplant MRD is an important predictor of the outcome in patients allografted for AML/MDS and is most informative when combined with T-cell chimerism results, underlining the importance of a GVL effect in AML/MDS.

Application of prophylactic or pre-emptive therapy after allogeneic transplantation for high-risk patients with t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia

ABSTRACTObjectivesTo determine the impact of pretransplant measurable residual disease (pre-MRD) and the efficacy of maintenance therapy in t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 100 t(8;21) AML patients who underwent allo-HCT between 2013 and 2022. 40 patients received pre-emptive therapy including immunosuppressant adjustment, azacitidine, and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) combined with chemotherapy. 23 patients received prophylactic therapy, including azacitidine or chidamide.ResultsPatients with a positive pre-MRD (pre-MRDpos) had a higher 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (25.90% [95% CI, 13.87%–39.70%] vs 5.00% [95% CI, 0.88%–15.01%]; P = 0.008). Pre-MRDpos patients were less likely to have a superior 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) (40.83% [95% CI, 20.80%–80.16%]) if their MRD was still positive at 28 days after transplantation (post-MRD28pos). The 3-year DFS and CIR were 53.17% (95% CI, 38.31% – 73.80%) and 34.87% (95% CI, 18.84% – 51.44%), respectively, for patients receiving pre-emptive interventions after molecular relapse. The 3-year DFS and CIR were 90.00% (95%CI, 77.77% – 100%) and 5.00% (95%CI, 0.31% – 21.10%), respectively, for high-risk patients receiving prophylactic therapy. In most patients, epigenetic-drug-induced adverse events were reversible with dose adjustment or temporary discontinuation.ConclusionPatients with pre-MRDpos and post-MRD28pos were more likely to have higher rates of relapse and inferior DFS, even after receiving pre-emptive interventions. Prophylactic therapy may be a better option for high-risk t(8;21) AML patients; however, this warrants further investigation.

Impact of measurable residual disease on outcomes of unrelated donor haematopoietic cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide in AML in first complete remission.

Pre-transplant measurable residual disease (MRD) predicts relapse and outcome of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). The impact of MRD on the outcomes of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based allo-HCT from a matched unrelated donor (UD) is unknown. This study assessed the impact of MRD in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in the first complete remission (CR1). A total of 272 patients (MRD negative [MRD-], n= 165; MRD positive [MRD+], n= 107) with a median follow-up of 19 (range: 16-24) months were studied. The incidence of grades II-IV and grades III-IV acute GVHD at day 180 was 25.2% and 25% (p= 0.99), and 10.6% and 6.8% (p= 0.29), respectively, and 2-year chronic GVHD was 35% and 30.4% (p= 0.96) in MRD+ and MRD- cohorts, respectively. In multivariate analysis, MRD+ status was associated with a higher incidence of relapse (RI) (hazard ratio [HR]=2.56, 95% CI: 1.39-4.72), lower leukaemia-free survival (LFS) (HR=2.04, 95% CI: 1.23-3.39), overall survival (OS) (HR=1.83, 95% CI: 1.04-3.25) and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) (HR=1.69, 95% CI: 1.10-2.58). MRD status did not have a significant impact on non-relapse mortality (NRM), or acute or chronic GVHD risk. Among patients with AML undergoing UD allo-HCT with PTCy, pre-transplant MRD+ status predicted a higher relapse rate, lower LFS, OS and GRFS.

128 - Pre-Transplant Measurable Residual Disease By Next-Generation Sequencing Is a Better Predictor of Relapse Compared to BCR-ABL PCR in Adult Patients with Ph+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

128 - Pre-Transplant Measurable Residual Disease By Next-Generation Sequencing Is a Better Predictor of Relapse Compared to BCR-ABL PCR in Adult Patients with Ph+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Transplant in AML with measurable residual disease: proceed or defer?

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation plays a central role in the management of fit adults with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete morphologic remission (CR1). Advances in both donor selection and transplant technology have both dramatically increased accessibility of transplant and led to significant reductions in transplant-related mortality over the past 2 decades. There has, however, been no concomitant reduction in the risk of disease relapse, which remains the major cause of transplant failure. Pivotal to the design of innovative strategies with the potential to reduce relapse risk is accurate identification of patients at the highest risk of disease recurrence. Multiple retrospective studies have identified an increased risk of disease relapse in patients allografted for AML in CR1 with evidence of pretransplant measurable residual disease (MRD). The prognostic significance of pretransplant MRD has been confirmed recently in prospective analyses. The optimal management of patients with evidence of pretransplant MRD remains a matter of conjecture with regard to 2 key issues. First, should the presence of pretransplant MRD delay a decision to proceed to transplant, allowing time for delivery of additional MRD-directed therapy prior to transplant? Second, to what extent can the intensity of the conditioning regimen or the magnitude of the graft-vs-leukemia effect be manipulated to improve the outcome of such patients?

The Impact of Maintenance Therapy Post Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation on Survival Outcomes in Patients Diagnosed with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Persistent Measurable Residual Disease: A Retrospective Cohort

Background: Despite achieving complete remission with standard chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are still at high risk of transplant failure due to disease relapse. Maintenance therapy post allo-HSCT including hypomethylating agents or FLT3 inhibitors is implemented in our institutional guidelines to mitigate this risk. Moreover, measurable residual disease (MRD) status of patients is considered an important independent marker of disease prognosis, in which a detectable MRD status pre-transplant is associated with poorer long-term outcomes. Objective: The aim of this research is to evaluate the impact of maintenance therapy post allo-HSCT on the survival outcomes of transplanted patients based on their pre-transplant MRD status. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review for a total of 108 adult patients diagnosed with AML and who had undergone allo-HSCT at our center between 2015 and 2021. We estimated both overall survival (OS) and relapsed free survival (RFS) using Kaplan Meier curves from the time of transplant among patients who received maintenance treatment based on their MRD status pre-transplant. MRD status was determined using either multiparametric flow cytometry, next-generation sequencing, and/or RT-PCR. Results: The median age at transplant was 47 years, 60% (n=65) of the patients were males. 66.7% of the patients had an intermediate disease risk index score. 25.2%, 61.8% and 13% of the patients had favorable, intermediate and adverse ELN risk respectively. Among the 108 patients, 77 received maintenance therapy post-transplant, of which 36 patients had a detectable pre-transplant MRD and 41 patients did not. Maintenance therapy consisted mainly of low dose hypomethylating agent (HMA) azacitidine in 68.8% (n=53) of the patients, followed by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in 18.2% (n=14) of the patients, and a combination of HMA with TKI, and/ or a BCL2 inhibitor in 13% (n=10). Median duration of maintenance was 20.7 months (range: 0.1-84.2 months). Among patients who received maintenance therapy (n=77), there were no statistically significant difference in both OS and RFS based on MRD status pre-transplant, (4-year OS: 76% versus 63%, p=0.6; 4-year RFS: 63% versus 57%, p=0.53). Conclusions: Our analysis showed no significant difference in survival outcomes of patients receiving maintenance therapy post allo-HSCT based on their pre-transplant MRD. Maintenance treatment could overcome the negative predictive value of detectable MRD to be confirmed by larger prospective studies. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

TBI-Based Myeloablative Conditioning Prior to Haploidentical Versus Matched Donor Transplantation for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Data from the CIMBTR has previously demonstrated the non-inferiority of transplantation from a haploidentical donor (HAPLO) using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) vs. matched related (MRD) or unrelated donors (MUD) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (Wieduwilt et al. Blood Advances 2022). However, total body irradiation (TBI)-containing myeloablative conditioning (MAC) was used in less than 60% of MRD/MUD patients and in approximately 40% of HAPLO patients. We aimed to better define the role of donor type (HAPLO vs. MRD/MUD) following TBI-MAC-based allogenic transplant for ALL. To this end, we analyzed 105 consecutive ALL patients receiving a first allogeneic transplant at our institution following TBI-MAC from an MRD [30], MUD [24] or HAPLO [51] donor between Jan 2011 to Sept 2021. HAPLO patients received a preparative regimen of fludarabine (90mg/m2) and TBI 1200 cGy, followed by post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. MRD/MUD patients received TBI 1200 cGy with either Cy (120mg/kg, n= 33) or etoposide (60mg/kg, n=21), followed by tacrolimus and methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis. Baseline characteristics include a median age of 40 (range, 29-51) years, HCT-CI ≥3 in 53%, poor risk cytogenetics in 60% (Ph+ [37%], Ph-like [11%], complex karyotype [7%] and 11q23 translocation [5%]). PBSC was the graft source in 94%. Pre-transplant status was CR1, CR2/3, or PIF/relapse in 75%, 12% and 13% respectively. Pre-transplant measurable residual disease (MRD) was seen in 28%). Baseline demographics of HAPLO and MRD/MUD recipients were similar with the exception of race/ethnicity, where HAPLO recipients (vs. MRD/MUD) were significantly less likely to be non-Hispanic White (29% vs. 67%). Comparison of baseline disease characteristics revealed more T-cell lineage disease (27% vs. 4%) and less poor risk cytogenetics (47% vs. 72%) in HAPLO vs. MRD/MUD recipients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 70 months (range, 8-134), 5-yr overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) for the whole cohort was 62%, 54%, 29% and 18% respectively, with no significant differences between HAPLO and MRD/MUD transplants (see figure). In multivariable analysis, controlling for other significant covariates (race, pre-transplant disease status and pre-transplant MRD), donor type (HAPLO vs. MRD/MUD) did not have a significant impact on OS (HR 1.04, p=0.91)) or DFS (HR 0.99, p=0.97)). TBI-MAC-based HAPLO represents a favorable alternative donor source with comparable long-term DFS and OS. This is of particular importance to patients of racial/ethnic minorities, whereby rapid and practically universal access to a HAPLO donor allows for curative-intent therapy in the vast majority of high-risk ALL patients. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Prognostic Significance of Measurable Residual Disease for Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in Second Complete Remission and Beyond

Introduction: For patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) in first complete remission (CR1), measurable residual disease (MRD) prior to HCT is strongly associated with post-HCT relapse rates and overall survival (OS). However, for a growing number of patients with ALL, HCT is deferred until the second remission (CR2) or beyond. It is unclear whether pre-transplant MRD assessment is also prognostic in the setting of HCT beyond CR1. Methods: We performed a single center retrospective study to test the hypothesis that pre-transplant MRD positivity is associated with outcomes in patients receiving HCT in CR2 or beyond for ALL. MRD was measured by 6-color flow cytometry with a sensitivity of 0.01%. Consecutive pediatric and adult patients who underwent first allogeneic HCT between the years 2004-2021 for ALL in CR2 or beyond were included. Results: We identified 162 patients (Table 1), 123 (76%) with B-ALL and the remainder with T-ALL. The majority (80%, n=129) of patients were in CR2 at the time of HCT, the remainder in third CR or beyond (CR3+). One hundred and five (65%) patients were male and median age at transplant was 31 (range 4-69) years. Graft source was either matched unrelated donor (MUD) (43%, n=69), matched sibling donor (MSD) (24%, n=39), haploidentical (18%, n=29) or cord blood transplantation (CBT) (15%, n=25). Pre-HCT MRD status was determined for 150 (93%) of patients and of those was positive in 43 (26%). Subsequent analyses were limited to the subset of patients with known MRD status. There was no statistical difference in characteristics according to MRD status except for higher proportion of CR3+ patients (33% vs. 16%, p=0.02) and comorbidity index >2 (70% vs. 40%, p=0.001) in MRD positive vs. negative patients. The median follow-up in surviving patients was 62 (range 20-104) and 47 (range: 2-171) months in MRD positive and negative patients, respectively. In multivariate analysis (MVA) evaluating transplantation outcomes at 3 years, pre-HCT MRD positivity was associated with a higher rate of disease relapse (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.6; p=0.02); but it had no impact on non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4-1.8; p=0.6). Subset analyses showed that these trends were consistent for patients receiving HCT in CR2 or CR3+; however the impact on disease relapse was more pronounced for patients in CR2 at HCT. MRD positivity was also associated with less favorable overall (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.2-3.3; p=0.01) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.5-4.2; p<0.001) for patients receiving HCT in CR2. MRD was not associated with OS (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.4-2, p=0.8) or PFS (HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.3-1.7, p=0.5) for patients receiving HCT in CR3+. As shown in Figure 1 A-B, OS and PFS were significantly superior for MRD negative patients receiving HCT in CR2. OS and PFS for MRD positive patients in CR2 were comparable to patients receiving HCT in CR3+. Conclusions: Pre-transplant MRD positivity is predictive of disease relapse in patients undergoing HCT for ALL in CR2 or beyond; however, the survival advantage associated with MRD negativity maybe limited to patients undergoing HCT in CR2. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Maintenance Therapy with Venetoclax/Azacitidine Can be Safely Given after Venetoclax/FluBu2 RIC Allogeneic Transplantation for the Treatment of High Risk MDS/AML: Results of a Phase 1 Study

Background: Relapse is the main cause of transplant failure. We previously reported safety and durable remissions with venetoclax (Ven) added to fludarabine/busulfan (FluBu2) reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) without planned maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with high risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)/acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Garcia, Blood Advances, 2021). Detectable measurable residual disease (MRD) at day +100 frequently resulted in relapse after transplant. To address relapse risk after VenFluBu2 transplant in this high risk population, we assessed the safety and activity of Ven/Azacitidine (VenAza) maintenance therapy. Methods: In a Phase 1 trial (NCT03613532), pts with an 8/8 HLA-matched donor and diagnosis of AML with <5% blasts (ELN adverse, secondary, or flow MRD positive) or MDS/MPN or MDS with ≥10% blasts (secondary, IPSS higher risk, or TP53mut or RAS pathway mutations) received VenFluBu2 (Ven 400 mg on D-8 to D-2; fludarabine 30 mg/m2/d on D-5 to D-2; IV busulfan 0.8 mg/kg bid on D-5 to D-2), followed by PBSC infusion (D0) and tacrolimus/methotrexate GVHD prophylaxis. Between D42-D90, VenAza maintenance therapy (Ven 400 mg on D1-D14 and Aza 36 mg/m2 IV on D1-D5) was initiated in pts who engrafted and had no evidence of morphologic relapse or uncontrolled GVHD in 42-day (dose level 1) or 28-day (dose level 2) cycles for up to 1 year. DLT was defined as Gr 4 neutropenia/thrombocytopenia >2 wks. Clinical NGS (sensitivity 1-3%) was performed before and after HCT (+28, +100). BH3 profiling analysis was performed on 11 paired blood samples before/after cycle 1 of VenAza. Results: As of 6/2022, 27 pts were enrolled and had the following disease status at time of HCT: 10 AML pts (8 CR, 2 CRi); 16 MDS pts (1 CR, 5 marrow CR (mCR) with hematologic improvement (HI), 5 mCR without HI, 1 HI-erythroid alone, and 4 active disease (5-10% blasts)); and 1 MDS/MPN pt in CR. Pts had a median age of 67y (range 47,78), co-morbidities (52% HCT-CI≥4), 44% were flow MRD negative, and 56% had Ven exposure prior to HCT. Baseline TP53mut was present in 59% (16/27). After VenFluBu2 RIC HCT, 22 of 27 pts received VenAza maintenance therapy (n=11 per dose level); remaining 5 of 27 pts did not (3 relapsed early, 2 withdrew). No DLTs were observed. The most common grade 3-4 treatment emergent adverse events (AE) during maintenance were anemia (45%), neutropenia (95%) and thrombocytopenia (91%), which were mainly transient. Cycle 1 nadir occurred on D29 for ANC (median 1.2 K/µL, range 0,3.7) and on D15 for platelet (median 119 K/µL, range 70,169). Infection during maintenance was reported in only 1 pt (n=1 BK viruria). Serious AEs were reported in 2 (1 rash; 1 BK case). Median of 4 VenAza cycles were received in DL1 (range 1,8); DL2 on-going. Cumulative incidence of grade ≥2 acute GVHD at 6 mo was 22% (95% CI: 9,39) and chronic GVHD at 1y was 23% (95% CI: 8,42). With a median 12 mo follow up (range 4-21), regardless of maintenance status, 1y OS, PFS, NRM and relapse were 70% (95% CI: 46,85), 57% (95% CI: 36,74), 0% and 43% (95% CI: 28,57), respectively. To date, 12 of 27 pts have relapsed (4 before, 7 during, and 1 after maintenance on D523). Ven use prior to HCT did not impact outcome. Pre-transplant flow MRD negativity was associated with improved 1y OS (88% vs 50%, p=0.03) and 1y PFS (81% vs 39%, p=0.08). Flow MRD was positive in 17% (4/24) at D28 and in 44% (11/25) at D100. At time of HCT, NGS was positive in 89% (24/27), but this reduced to 42% (10/24) at D28 and 58% (14/24) at D100 (Figure 1). PFS was similar for those with or without TP53mut at HCT (p=0.14). Among 22 pts that received VenAza maintenance therapy, 1y PFS and 1y OS were 65% (95% CI: 40,82) and 79% (95% CI: 52,92), respectively. BH3 profiling did not reveal any significant changes in baseline apoptotic priming in CD3+, CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+ T cells, and CD3+CD4+CD127-CD25+ Treg cells, suggesting VenAza was not cytotoxic to T cells. Flow cytometry to assess for immune recovery is in process. Conclusions: VenAza maintenance therapy after VenFluBu2 RIC alloHCT appears to be safe with low infection rate and no excessive GVHD. This Ven-based peri-transplant strategy for high risk MDS/AML pts has encouraging activity though relapses still occurred. A cohort assessing all oral maintenance (Ven plus decitabine/cedazuridine) is enrolling. A randomized trial will be required to evaluate the benefit of Ven with conditioning chemotherapy or with maintenance therapy. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Presence of Measurable Residual Disease in NPM1 Positive AML in Remission Pre-Transplant Does Not Impact on Survival after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Due to their biological and clinical features, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with Nucleophosmin-1 (NPM1) gene mutations represents a distinct entity within the WHO classification 2022. As per ELN classification, they are mainly categorized either as favorable or intermediate-risk disease, and as such patients are referred for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) at disease relapse, during CR1 or, less frequently, due to primary refractoriness. However, even when transplanted, relapse remains the most common cause of treatment failure. Besides conditioning intensity, presence of measurable residual disease (MRD) at time of allo-HSCT has recently been shown to be associated with an increased risk of relapse post-transplant. Yet, the reported effect might vary according to genetic and immunophenotypic diversity of the disease, transplant setting and MRD technology used. Here, we aim to determine the impact of NPM1 presence assessed via qPCR on post allo-HSCT outcomes. This retrospective study included adult AML patients harboring an NPM1 mutation (NPM1mut) who received a first allo-HSCT between January 2011 and January 2022 at four German transplant centers. NPM1 mutation status was assessed at diagnosis, and monitored throughout the treatment course by qPCR. NPM1 MRD monitoring was performed as previously described (Papadaki et al., 2009, sensitivity of 10−6). MRD status pre-transplant was correlated with outcome. There were no restrictions regarding donor type or conditioning intensity We identified 161 adult AML patients with available pre-transplant MRD status. Median age of the entire cohort was 55 years (21-75). The majority of patients (86%) had cytogenetically normal AML and presented in hematologic remission (CR1, CR2) (69%) at time of allo-HSCT. Whereas NPM1mut was measurable in all patients with active disease, 85/111 (77%) patients in remission had either NPM1mut persistence after antecedent induction/consolidation therapy (n=68) or molecular relapse (n=17). Conditioning intensity used was RIC in 57, MAC in 12, sequential-RIC in 88 and sequential-MAC in 4 patients. Most patients (n=90) were transplanted from matched unrelated donor (matched related: n=37, haploidentical: n=34), using preferentially PBSCs as graft source (n=146). At a median follow-up of 28 months (3-127), the estimated probability of OS and LFS at 2 years was 63% and 55%, respectively. When patients are stratified into groups with active disease, vs NPM1+CR vs NPM1- CR, 2-year OS and LFS show a significant difference (45% vs. 73% vs. 71%; p=0.002 and 55% vs. 62% vs. 67% p=0.005, respectively). Yet, if considering only patients in remission, no survival difference according to NPM1-MRD status at transplantation was detected (OS, p=0.49 and LFS, p=0.33). Likewise, cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 44%, 15% and 17% (p=0.001); however among remission patients there was no significant difference between MRD+ and MRD- patients before allo-HSCT (p=0.96). CI of NRM at 1-year was 14%, 18% and 8% for non-CR, NPM1+ CR and NPM1- CR patients (p=0.9). Intriguingly, MRD positivity as assessed per qPCR at time of transplant did not impact on post-transplant outcome in our cohort of NPM1 positive AML. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Effects of CD34+ cell dose on haematopoietic recovery in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia patients with positive pretransplant measurable residual disease.

A higher CD34+ cell dose in allografts is associated with faster haematopoietic recovery after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Leukaemia stem cells impair normal bone marrow (BM) niches and induce BM failure during leukemogenesis. However, whether measurable residual disease (MRD), known as the persistence of low-level leukaemic cells, could influence the effects of CD34+ cell dose on haematopoietic recovery after transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients is unknown. A total of 975 ALL patients were enrolled and classified into pre-HSCT MRD-positive and MRD-negative subgroups. Cox proportional hazard regression models were built for time-to-event outcomes. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine independent influencing factors from the univariate analysis. An appropriate CD34+ cell dose was positively associated with faster haematopoietic recovery in the total ALL population. More importantly, in pre-HSCT MRD-positive ALL patients, a higher CD34+ cell dose (≥2.76 × 106 /kg) was related to faster neutrophil (HR 1.330, 95% CI 1.045-1.692, p=0.021) and platelet engraftment (HR 1.808, 95% CI 1.412-2.316, p < 0.001) in multivariate analysis. CD34+ cell dose was a crucial factor associated with either engraftment or transplant outcomes, although we did not demonstrate direct correlations of CD34+ cell dose with relapse, TRM, LFS or OS after allo-HSCT. Our results indicated that no additional CD34+ stem and progenitor cell harvests were needed to ensure successful haematopoietic recovery in pre-HSCT MRD-positive patients compared to pre-HSCT MRD-negative patients.

Clinical Impact of Measurable Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Simple SummaryAdvances in immunophenotyping and molecular techniques have allowed for the development of more sensitive diagnostic tests in acute leukemia. These techniques can identify low levels of leukemic cells (quantified as 10−4 to 10−6 ratio to white blood cells) in patient samples. The presence of such low levels of leukemic cells, termed “measurable/minimal residual disease” (MRD), has been shown to be a marker of disease burden and patient outcomes. In acute lymphoblastic leukemia, new agents are highly effective at eliminating MRD for patients whose leukemia progressed despite first line therapies. By comparison, the role of MRD in acute myeloid leukemia is less clear. This commentary reviews select data and remaining questions about the clinical application of MRD to the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Measurable residual disease (MRD) has emerged as a primary marker of risk severity and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). There is, however, ongoing debate about MRD-based surveillance and treatment. A literature review was performed using the PubMed database with the keywords MRD or residual disease in recently published journals. Identified articles describe the prognostic value of pre-transplant MRD and suggest optimal timing and techniques to quantify MRD. Several studies address the implications of MRD on treatment selection and hematopoietic stem cell transplant, including patient candidacy, conditioning regimen, and transplant type. More prospective, randomized studies are needed to guide the application of MRD in the treatment of AML, particularly in transplant.

Autologous stem cell transplantation in favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia: single-center experience and current challenges.

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has gained growing consideration as a treatment option for favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia (FR-AML) in first complete remission (CR1), compared with chemotherapy. We report the long-term outcomes of 117 consecutive patients with FR-AML fit for intensive chemotherapy diagnosed in our center between 1999 and 2020, who underwent ASCT. Sixty-five of the 117 were eligible for intensive post-remission treatment, and 42 of those 65 received ASCT. Median follow up was 132 months. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 75% and 76%. Higher doses of CD34 + stem cell infusions negatively impacted DFS in multivariate analysis. Core-binding factor (CBF) leukemia was an independent prognostic factor for improved DFS. No differences based on pre-transplant measurable residual disease (MRD) were observed. In CBF leukemia, 10-year DFS is 72% for MRD-positive patients versus 100% for MRD negative patients. ASCT is effective and safe in FR-AML patients. In CBF leukemia, ASCT provides excellent results regardless of achievement of bone marrow MRD negativity. In NPM1-mutated/FLT3-wild type (mNPM1) AML, early molecular response seems to have more impact on prognosis. Prospective investigation of the role of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in this setting is ongoing.

Post-Transplant MRD Status and T Cell Chimerism Predict Outcomes in Patients Allografted for AML/MDS-a Prospective Analysis from the UK NCRI Figaro Trial

▪Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation is an important curative strategy in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) consequent upon the development of a graft-versus-leukaemia (GVL) effect. Disease relapse is the major cause of transplant failure and novel therapeutic strategies are required in patients with measurable residual disease (MRD) post-transplant. Recognizing that full donor T cell chimerism serves as a biomarker of GVL and that mixed donor T cell chimerism reflects the presence of bi-directional tolerance, we report the first prospective correlation of the impact of post-transplant T cell chimerism and MRD in patients allografted for AML/MDS.Methods: 186 patients from FIGARO, a prospective randomized trial of reduced intensity conditioning regimens in AML/MDS, were alive and relapse free, at the first MRD timepoint and provided post-transplant bone marrow samples for flow cytometric MRD monitoring (day+42, month+3/+6/+9/+12) and peripheral blood samples for T cell chimerism analysis (3-monthly during the first year). Results were not available to clinicians. Flow cytometric MRD incorporating an unsupervised immunophenotypic analysis approach was used on 778 sequential samples. The prognostic significance of post-transplant MRD from each sampling timepoint was assessed by landmark analysis.Results: 29 (15.6%) patients were MRD+ at one or more timepoints in the first year after transplant. The presence of post-transplant MRD was associated with reduced OS (HR:2.19, p=0.0026) and RFS (HR:5.36, p<0.0001), when analyzed as a time varying Cox variable. We, and others, have shown that pre-transplant MRD status is an important determinant of post-transplant survival. We therefore performed a multivariate analysis of factors that may determine the prognoses of patients with pre-transplant MRD+ disease. This demonstrated that the presence of detectable post-transplant MRD was the only independent determinant of RFS in this group of patients (HR 9.05 (95%CI:1.70-48.2), p=0.0099), even when adjusted for cytogenetics, FLT3-ITD and GVHD. The highest frequency of post-transplant MRD positivity occurred at day+42/month+3. The 2yr OS of day+42 MRD+ patients (n=13/158) was 30.8% (95%CI 9.5-55.4) compared to 67.1% (95%CI 58.5-74.2) in MRD negative patients (p<0.001); and 2yr CIR in day+42 MRD+ patients was 92.3% (95% CI:35.8-99.4) versus 22.8%% (95%CI:16.3-29.9) when MRD negative (p<0.001). Day+42 MRD was associated with more rapid relapse kinetics (median RFS of 2 months) compared to when MRD was first detected at later timepoints.Next, we examined the impact of T-cell chimerism, and post-transplant MRD on outcomes. In patients with mixed-donor T-cell chimerism (MDTC) at month+3 or +6, the presence of post-transplant MRD (preceding or at time of first MDTC) was associated with decreased OS (p=0.001) and RFS. Specifically, 2yr RFS in MRD+ patients was 23.1% (95%CI:5.6-47.5), compared to 63.6% (95%CI:44.9-77.5) in patients who were MRD negative (p=0.004) (Figure). In contrast, in 48 patients with full donor T-cell chimerism (FDTC) at months 3 and 6, only 5 patients were MRD+ post-transplant and their outcomes were equivalent to patients who were MRD negative (FDTC/MRD negative 2yr RFS: 80.9% (95% CI:65.3-90.0)).Downregulation of HLA class II molecules on AML blasts after transplant may result in immune evasion from GVL: we examined whether this had an additional impact on outcome in post-transplant MRD+ patients. Both RFS and OS were significantly lower in MRD+ patients when MRD+ blasts had down-regulated HLA-DR expression. In MRD+ patients, 2yr OS was 20.0% (95%CI:3.1-47.5) in those with HLA-DR down-regulation, versus 57.9% (95%CI 33.2-76.3) in those without (p=0.001).Conclusion We demonstrate that dynamic assessment of post-transplant MRD is an important predictor of outcome in patients allografted for AML/MDS, with additional prognostic value to pre-transplant MRD assessment. Post-transplant MRD and T-cell chimerism results are most informative when combined, underlining the importance of a GVL effect in AML/MDS. This suggests post-transplant strategies which result in FDTC may improve outcomes in patients allografted for AML/MDS. Our data also supports the clinical relevance of monitoring for leukemic immune escape as HLA-DR down-regulation identifies a post-transplant MRD positive subgroup at risk of almost inevitable relapse. [Display omitted] DisclosuresLoke: Novartis: Other: Travel; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Daichi Sankyo: Other: Travel. Protheroe: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Kite Gilead: Honoraria. Dillon: Amgen: Other: Research support (paid to institution); Astellas: Consultancy, Other: Educational Events , Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Other: Education events; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: educational events; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Session chair (paid to institution), Speakers Bureau; Menarini: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research Support, Educational Events. Craddock: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board ; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Outcome of Human Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (CBT) for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Patients Achieving First Complete Remission after One Versus Two Induction Courses: A Study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

Background: Achieving a first complete remission (CR1) is an important prognostic factor for transplantation outcome. However, there are no data in the setting of cord blood transplantation (CBT) indicating whether the number of induction courses (1 or 2) needed to achieve CR1, is of prognostic significance. As CBT is advantageous for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) patients (pts) with positive pre transplant measurable residual disease (MRD) (Milano F, NEJM 2016), it is conceivable that in the CBT setting, no difference in transplantation outcome will be observed between pts achieving CR1 after 1 or 2 inductions.Methods: Using the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)/Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) registry, we compared transplantation outcomes of adult pts aged ≥18 years with AML that underwent CBT in 2005-2020 in CR1, achieved following 1 versus (vs) 2 induction courses. Multivariate analysis (MVA) adjusting for differences between the induction groups was performed using a Cox's proportional-hazards regression model for main outcomes.Results: Three hundred and twenty-five pts were included comprising 243 (75%) with 1 and 82 (25%) with 2 induction chemotherapy courses. Median (range) follow-up was 65.4 (57.4-73.5) and 51.0 (34.8-61.5) months, respectively (p=0.6). Median age was 49.4 (19.0-70.9) and 52.1 (19.2-71.5) years (p=0.8), respectively. For patients with 1 and 2 induction courses, respectively, 49.4% and 57.3% were male, 225 (92.6%) and 78 (95.1%) pts had de novo AML, and 18 (7.4%) and 4 (4.9%) had secondary AML (p=0.6). Pts with 1 and 2 induction courses, respectively, were classified by cytogenetic risk as follows: intermediate, 62.0% and 79.2%, adverse, 33.2% and 19.5%, and favorable, 4.8% and 1.3% (p=0.02) (missing data~25%). The FLT3-ITD mutation was harbored by 33.7% and 32.3% of the pts (p=0.8), respectively (missing data ~6%). Conditioning was myeloablative (MAC) in 43.0% and 36.6% and reduced intensity (RIC) in 57.0% and 63.4%, respectively (p=0.31). Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was > 90 in 74.7% and 71% of the pts, respectively (p=0.5). The most frequent anti-graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was cyclosporin A (CSA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in 75.6% and 82.5 %, or CSA with or without steroids in 16.1 % and 11.2%, respectively. Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) was administered to 32.9% and 25.6% of the CBT recipients, respectively (p=0.2). Engraftment rates were lower for pts achieving CR1 after 1 vs 2 induction courses (91.3% and 98.8% p=0.02) with corresponding day 60 absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 0.5 x 10 9/L in 89.6% vs 96.3% of the pts (p=0.03).Day 180 incidence of acute GVHD grades II-IV was similar in both induction groups, 38.3% and 37.2% (p=0.8), as was 2-year total chronic GVHD, 23.4% and 27.5 %, respectively (p=0.6). In univariate analysis, the 2–year non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse incidence (RI), leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS) and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) were similar between patients achieving CR1 with 1 vs 2 induction courses with 22.6% vs 23.6% (p=0.87) 25.1% vs 30.4% (p=0.4), 52.3% vs 46.0% (p=0.3), 58.6% vs 50.0% (p=0.2), and 44% vs 44.1% (p=0.66), respectively. Similarly in MVA, there was no significant association between 2 courses of induction and NRM (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.1; 95% CI, 0.6-1.8, p=0.7), RI (HR = 1.4; 95% CI, 0.9-2.3, p=0.1), LFS (HR = 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-1.8, p=0.2), OS (HR = 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-1.9, p=0.1), and GRFS (HR = 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8-1.5, p=0.5).Conclusions: In CBT recipients, we did not find any significant differences in outcomes in patients achieving CR1 after one or two induction courses. Notably, engraftment was better in patients receiving two courses of induction chemotherapy. [Display omitted] DisclosuresLabopin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Forcade: Novartis: Other: travel grant. Sierra: Amgen: Other: Educational grant; Roche: Other: Educational grant; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Other: Educational grant; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Educational grant; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Byrne: Incyte: Honoraria. Blaise: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Mohty: Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria.

Impact of timely BCR-ABL1 monitoring before allogeneic stem cell transplantation among patients with BCR-ABL1-positive B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BackgroundWith the emergence of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and the incorporation of stringent measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring, risk stratification for BCR-ABL1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients has changed significantly. However, whether this monitoring can replace conventional risk factors in determining whether patients need allogeneic stem cell transplantation is still unclear. This study aimed to determine the impact of BCR-ABL1 monitoring on the outcome of patients with BCR-ABL1-positive ALL after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the survival outcome of patients with BCR-ABL1-positive ALL based on the quantification of BCR-ABL1 at 3 timepoints the end of induction (timepoint 1), post-consolidation week 16 (timepoint 2), and the end of treatment for patients who were either transplant-eligible or non-transplant eligible (timepoint 3).ResultsFrom 2006 to 2018, a total of 96 patients newly diagnosed with BCR-ABL1-positive ALL were treated with chemotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Thirty-eight (41.3%) patients achieved complete remission, and 33 patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Our data showed that pre-transplant MRD monitoring by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction had the highest correlation with survival in patients with BCR-ABL1-positive ALL, especially for those who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation.ConclusionPatients without MRD pre-transplantation had superior survival compared with those who had MRD, and they had excellent long-term outcomes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.