Pretransplant Dialysis Research Articles

Early Relaparotomy After Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) is a promising therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease. Although the long-term outcome of SPKT is extensively documented, the incidence of early complications within the first weeks after the surgery is less described. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, causes, and risk factors of early relaparotomy after SPKT. All SPKT performed in the university hospital between 2005 and 2008 were enrolled. The primary endpoint was defined as the need for at least one relaparotomy after SPKT within the initial hospital stay. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of vascular graft thrombosis, postoperative sepsis, patient, and graft survival. Sixty-one patients were included. During their initial hospital stay, 27 (44.3%) SPKT recipients required at least one relaparotomy. The main causes of relaparotomy were hemorrhage (59.3%) and vascular graft thrombosis (22.2%). First relaparotomy occurred at a median postoperative time of 1 day (interquartile range, 1-6). Pretransplant dialysis and nontraumatic cause of donor brain death were identified as independent risk factors for early relaparotomy. Thirty-two patients (52.4%) experienced a symptomatic or asymptomatic vascular graft thrombosis. The early postoperative period remains a high-risk phase for relaparotomy. The selection of recipients before initiation of long-term dialysis and of donors deceased from traumatic causes may reduce the rate of these early complications after SPKT. Vascular graft thrombosis and bleeding are two major issues that arise during this critical period, suggesting the importance an adequate management of postoperative anticoagulation and hemostasis.

Hyperuricemia at 1 Year After Renal Transplantation, Its Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Graft Survival

The present study investigated the prevalence and predictors for the development of hyperuricemia within 1 year after transplantation and their associations with genetic polymorphisms and graft outcome in patients taking tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. One hundred twenty-one renal allograft recipients transplanted between January 2001 and March 2009 were studied. Patients with serum uric acid concentrations above 7.0 mg/dL within 1 year after transplantation were defined as having hyperuricemia, and all were treated with allopurinol. Genetic polymorphisms of nitric oxide synthase, angiotensin-converting enzyme, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, and 3 uric acid transporters were examined. At 1 year after transplantation, 46 (38%) recipients developed hyperuricemia. Male gender, higher body mass index, long-term pretransplantation dialysis, and hypertension were associated with the development of hyperuricemia. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 year after transplantation was lower in the patients with hyperuricemia than in those without. There were no differences in graft survival between the two groups. The pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid and 6 polymorphisms were not associated with hyperuricemia. In the multivariate analysis, male gender, long-term pretransplantation dialysis (>36 months), and eGFR (<60 mL/min) were independently associated with the development of hyperuricemia. The incidence of hyperuricemia in our cohort was 38%. Male gender and long-term pretransplantation dialysis were predictors for the development of hyperuricemia. The eGFR was lower in patients with hyperuricemia, but graft survival did not differ between the patients with hyperuricemia treated with alloprinol and those without hyperuricemia. We could not define the significance of the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressants and genetic risk factors for hyperuricemia.

Association between initial and pretransplant dialysis modality and graft and patient outcomes in live- and deceased-donor renal transplant recipients

The association between pretransplant dialysis modality and transplant outcomes remains inconsistent. The aim of this study is to address the association between alteration in dialysis modality and post-transplant outcomes. Using Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, primary live- and deceased-donor renal transplant recipients (RTR) between 1997 and 2009 were examined. Pre-emptive and multiple-organ transplants were excluded. The association between initial and pretransplant dialysis modality and transplant outcomes were examined. Of the 6701 RTR, 18.6% were initiated-maintained on peritoneal dialysis pretransplant (PD-PD), 9.2% were initiated on PD, but maintained on haemodialysis (HD) pretransplant (PD-HD), 63.3% were HD-HD and 8.9% were HD-PD. PD-HD [odds ratio(OR)1.44, 95% CI 1.21,1.72] and HD-HD (OR1.25, 95% CI 1.12,1.41) were associated with a significantly greater risk of slow graft function compared with the overall mean of the groups, whereas a change in initial dialysis modality from HD to pretransplant PD was associated with higher risk of overall graft failure [hazard ratio(HR)1.19, 95% CI 1.04,1.36) and recipient death (HR1.34, 95% CI 1.13,1.59). Our registry analysis suggest that dialysis modality pretransplant may affect transplant outcomes and future studies evaluating patient selection, choice of modality and/or potential interventions in the pre and post-transplant period may have a beneficial effect on post-transplant outcomes.

Urologic De Novo Malignancies After Kidney Transplantation: A Single Center Experience

IntroductionUrologic cancers are the second or third most common malignancies in renal transplant (RT) recipients. This study sought to determine the incidence of and identify possible risk factors for urologic malignancies among patients who underwent transplantation at our center. MethodsThis retrospective, single-center cohort included 836 patients who underwent transplantation from 1994 to 2011 who remained under our care. A review of their medical records revealed 63 subjects with de novo cancer, including 21 with urologic malignancies (2.5%). We analyzed demographic and clinical data of cancer versus noncancer patients with differences considered to be significant at P < .05. ResultsThe urologic malignancies included renal cell carcinoma (n = 13), prostate cancer (n = 5), and bladder transitional cell carcinoma (n = 3). The mean follow-up time was 10 ± 3.9 years. The mean age at diagnosis was 54 ± 7.4 years and the mean time from transplantation was 4 ± 3.3 years. The mortality rate among group was 19.0%. The analysis did not show significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between the groups, except for the prevalence of male gender and smoking status among the cancer cohort. No significant differences were observed for other suspected risk factors, including immunosuppressive protocols, time of pretransplantation dialysis, and age. ConclusionsThe development of urologic malignancies is an early event, frequently observed within 4–5 years after transplantation. Therefore, this period should be considered for routine urologic cancer screening.

Recent advances in our understanding of hepatorenal syndrome

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a serious complication of advanced cirrhosis with ascites. HRS develops as a result of abnormal haemodynamics, leading to splanchnic and systemic vasodilatation, but renal vasoconstriction. Increased bacterial translocation, various cytokines and mesenteric angiogenesis also contribute to splanchnic vasodilatation, and altered renal autoregulation is involved in the renal vasoconstriction. Type 1 HRS is usually initiated by a precipitating event associated with an exaggerated systemic inflammatory response that perturbs haemodynamics, resulting in multiorgan failure. An inadequate cardiac output with systolic incompetence increases the risk of renal failure. Vasoconstrictors are the main treatment in patients with type 1 HRS; terlipressin is the superior agent. Norepinephrine is similar to terlipressin in efficacy and can be used as an alternative. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt might be applicable in a small number of patients with type 1 HRS and in most patients with type 2 HRS. Liver transplantation is the definitive treatment for HRS, and should be performed after reversal of HRS. In nonresponders to vasoconstrictor therapy, much controversy still exists as to whether to do simultaneous or sequential liver and kidney transplant. In general, patients who have had >8-12 weeks of pretransplant dialysis should be considered for combined liver-kidney transplantation.

Impact of the etiology of acute kidney injury on outcomes following liver transplantation: acute tubular necrosis versus hepatorenal syndrome

Acute kidney injury (AKI) at the time of liver transplantation (LT) has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In patients with potentially reversible renal dysfunction, predicting whether there will be sufficient return of native kidney function is sometimes difficult. Previous studies have focused mainly on the effect of the severity of renal dysfunction or the duration of pretransplant dialysis on posttransplant outcomes. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent LT at our center after Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-based allocation so that we could determine the impact of the etiology of AKI [acute tubular necrosis (ATN) versus hepatorenal syndrome (HRS)] on post-LT outcomes. The patients were stratified according to the severity of AKI at the time of LT as described by the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-Stage Kidney Disease (RIFLE) classification: risk, injury, or failure. The RIFLE failure group was further subdivided according to the etiology of AKI: HRS or ATN. The patient survival and renal outcomes 1 and 5 years after LT were significantly worse for those with ATN. At 5 years, the incidence of chronic kidney disease (stage 4 or 5) was statistically higher in the ATN group versus the HRS group (56% versus 16%, P < 0.001). A multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of ATN at the time of LT was the only variable associated with higher mortality 1 year after LT (P < 0.001). Our study is the first to demonstrate that the etiology of AKI has the greatest impact on patient and renal outcomes after LT.

Poor early graft function impairs long-term outcome in living donor kidney transplantation

BackgroundPoor early graft function (EGF) after living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) has been found to decrease rejection-free graft survival rates. However, its influence on long-term graft survival remains inconclusive.MethodsData were collected on 472 adult LDKTs performed between July 1996 and February 2010. Poor EGF was defined as the occurrence of delayed or slow graft function. Slow function was defined as serum creatinine above 3.0 mg/dL at postoperative day 5 without dialysis.ResultsThe incidence of slow and delayed graft function was 9.3 and 4.4%, respectively. Recipient overweight, pretransplant dialysis and warm ischemia were identified as risk factors for the occurrence of poor EGF. The rejection-free survival was worse for poor EGF as compared to immediate graft function with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 6.189 (95% CI 4.075–9.399; p < 0.001). Long-term graft survival was impaired in the poor EGF group with an adjusted HR of 4.206 (95% CI 1.839–9.621; p = 0.001).ConclusionsPoor EGF occurs in 13.7% of living donor kidney allograft recipients. Both, rejection-free and long-term graft survivals are significantly lower in patients with poor EGF as compared to patients with immediate graft function. These results underline the clinical relevance of poor EGF as phenomenon after LDKT.

Mean Platelet Volume as a Potential Predictor of Renovascular Thrombosis After Renal Transplant

We sought to evaluate the importance of mean platelet volume as a marker to follow-up, the tendency for hemorrhagic diatheses, and/or thrombotic complications in patients before and after renal transplant. Thirty-four patients (aged, 5 to 18 y) were included. Demographics of the patients, cause of chronic renal failure, dialysis modality, duration of dialysis, arterio-venous fistula thrombosis, and posttransplant immunosuppressive regimens were recorded and laboratory variables were evaluated. At the end of the first posttransplant month, mean platelet volume level was decreased significantly when compared with pretransplant levels (8.3 ± 1.5 vs 7.7 ± 0.9; P = .04). A significant increase was observed in platelet levels during posttransplant measures (273.750 ± 97.700 vs 318.740 ± 84.586; P = .02). Prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time levels did not differ before and after transplant. None of the patients had any thrombotic events and/or renal allograft loss. A negative correlation was observed between mean platelet volume and C-reactive protein (r=-0.53). Mean platelet volume level was not found to be related to the cause of renal failure, pretransplant dialysis modality, or posttransplant immunosuppressive regimens. Platelet numbers increased and mean platelet volume decreased after pediatric renal transplant, but the potential for increased thrombosis was not observed.

The Mode of Pretransplant Dialysis Does Not Affect Postrenal Transplant Outcomes in African Americans

Background. In previous reports with a majority of Caucasian patients, peritoneal dialysis (PD) before kidney transplantation has been associated with poor outcomes and higher rates of graft thrombosis and infectious complications than hemodialysis (HD). We report our experience on the outcomes of prerenal transplant peritoneal dialysis in predominantly (73%) African American patient population. Methods. A retrospective data analysis of 401 kidney transplants performed at our center from 2000 to 2006 was performed. Adult recipients with at least three months of pretransplant HD or PD were included. Results. There were 339 patients on HD and 62 patients on PD. There was no difference in graft (P = 0.51) and patient survival (P = 0.52) at 1, 3, and 5-years. Patients on HD were more likely to experience delayed graft function than PD (38.8% versus 17.7%, P < 0.005). There was no difference in the incidence of vascular thrombosis or posttransplant infectious complications. When only the African American patients in the two groups were compared, there were no differences in graft or patient survival. Conclusions. Pretransplant peritoneal dialysis is associated with excellent patient and renal allograft outcomes in African Americans and does not predispose them to an increased risk of infectious or thrombotic complications.

Dialysis Modality and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients

The influence of pretransplant dialysis modality on post-transplant outcomes is not clear. This study examined associations of pretransplant dialysis modality with post-transplant outcomes in a large national cohort of kidney transplant recipients. Linking the 5-year patient data of a large dialysis organization to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, 12,416 hemodialysis and 2092 peritoneal dialysis patients who underwent first kidney transplantation were identified. Mortality or graft failure and delayed graft function risks were estimated by Cox regression (hazard ratio) and logistic regression (odds ratio), respectively. Recipients treated with peritoneal dialysis pretransplantation had lower (21.9/1000 patient-years [95% confidence interval: 18.1-26.5]) crude all-cause mortality rate than those recipients treated with hemodialysis (32.8/1000 patient-years [30.8-35.0]). Pretransplant peritoneal dialysis use was associated with 43% lower adjusted all-cause and 66% lower cardiovascular death. Furthermore, pretransplant peritoneal dialysis use was associated with 17% and 36% lower unadjusted death-censored graft failure and delayed graft function risk, respectively. However, after additional adjustment for relevant covariates, pretransplant peritoneal dialysis modality was not a significant predictor of death-censored graft failure delayed graft function, respectively. Similar trends were noted on analyses using a propensity score matched cohort of 2092 pairs of patients. Compared with hemodialysis, patients treated with peritoneal dialysis before transplantation had lower mortality but similar graft loss or delayed graft function. Confounding by residual selection bias cannot be ruled out.

Parathyroid hormone levels in long-term renal transplant children and adolescents

Secondary hyperparathyroidism is a common complication of chronic renal failure. Kidney transplantation corrects renal insufficiency and most metabolic abnormalities but hyperparathyroidism persists in 50% of children after transplantation. The aim of this study was to investigate parathyroid hormone (PTH) course and potential risk factors for hyperparathyroidism in children after renal transplant. We collected data from 145 transplanted children (mean follow-up 4.7 years). Intact PTH level (iPTH) rapidly decreased in the first 6 months post-transplant and continued to decline in the following years. iPTH was above the normal range in 69.1% of the patients at the time of transplant and in 47% 1 year later, this improvement continuing thereafter. Hypercalcemia was present in 20.3% of the patients before transplant and in 6.3 and 4.1% of patients 6 months and 1 year after transplant, respectively. Hypophosphatemia was present in 5.5% of the patients at 6 months, and 45.5% of the patients needed phosphorus supplements during the first 6 months after transplant. Multivariate analysis indicated pre-transplant hyperparathyroidism, dialysis duration, creatinine clearance and hypophosphatemia as predictors of persistent hyperparathyroidism. In kidney transplanted children, serum iPTH normalized in the long term in the majority of cases. Thus, parathyroidectomy should be reserved for selected patients.

Kidney transplantation outcomes in African-, Hispanic- and Caucasian-Americans with lupus

African-American recipients of kidney transplants with lupus have high allograft failure risk. We studied their risk adjusting for: (1) socio-demographic factors: donor age, gender and race-ethnicity; recipient age, gender, education and insurance; donor-recipient race-ethnicity match; (2) immunologic factors: donor type, panel reactive antibodies, HLA mismatch, ABO blood type compatibility, pre-transplant dialysis, cytomegalovirus risk and delayed graft function (DGF); (3) rejection and recurrent lupus nephritis (RLN). Two thousand four hundred and six African-, 1132 Hispanic-, and 2878 Caucasian-Americans were followed for 12 years after transplantation. African- versus Hispanic- and Caucasian-Americans received more kidneys from deceased donors (71.6%, 57.3% and 55.1%) with higher two HLA loci mismatches for HLA-A (50%, 39.6% and 32.4%), HLA-B (52%, 42.8% and 35.6%) and HLA-DR (30%, 24.5% and 21.1%). They developed more DGF (19.5%, 13.6% and 13.4%). More African- versus Hispanic- and Caucasian-Americans developed rejection (41.7%, 27.6% and 35.9%) and RLN (3.2, 1.8 and 1.8%). 852 African-, 265 Hispanic-, and 747 Caucasian-Americans had allograft failure (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for transplant era, socio-demographic-immunologic differences, rejection and RLN, the increased hazard ratio for allograft failure of African- compared with Caucasian-Americans became non-significant (1.26 [95% confidence interval 0.78-2.04]). African-Americans with lupus have high prevalence of risk factors for allograft failure that can explain poor outcomes.

Renal cell carcinoma of native kidneys in renal transplant patients

To outline recent findings on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of native kidneys in renal transplant patients. The incidence of RCC in native kidneys of renal transplant patients varies between 0.3 and 4.8%. The risk is increased in patients with acquired cystic kidney disease, in men, African-Americans, recipients aged at least 65 years, those with a longer pretransplant dialysis interval, a donor aged at least 50 years, and microscopic hematuria. On the basis of the risk factor profile, periodic ultrasound screening is recommended. Most RCCs in renal transplant patients are incidental low-stage, low-grade tumors with a good prognosis. The outstanding pathological findings are bilateral occurrence, papillary subtype and multifocality. Minimally invasive radical nephrectomy can be performed safely in these patients. Systemic treatment of metastatic RCC represents a challenge, with rapamycin analogues being an attractive option. The risk for RCC in native kidneys after renal transplantation is substantial. Multiple risk factors have been identified, although the exact risk-factor dependent screening protocol has yet to be determined. Most RCCs in renal transplant patients are low-stage, low-grade tumors with a good prognosis.

Correlations Between Pretransplant Dialysis Duration, Bladder Capacity, and Prevalence of Vesicoureteral Reflux to the Graft

Urinary bladder capacity is reduced in patients undergoing long-term dialysis, which may increase the risk of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) to a transplanted kidney. This study investigated the correlations between dialysis duration, pretransplant and posttransplant bladder capacity, and prevalence of VUR to the graft. Voiding cystography was performed in 101 adult renal transplant recipients without neurogenic disorders immediately before and 1 year after transplantation to evaluate bladder capacity and VUR. Nonstented extravesical antireflux ureteroneocystostomy was performed in all patients. The median dialysis duration and pretransplant bladder capacity were 32 months (range 1-426 months) and 120 mL (range 15-450 mL), and 21 patients (20.8%) underwent dialysis for more than 120 months, and 30 patients (29.7%) had a pretransplant bladder capacity of less than 80 mL. Dialysis duration was correlated with pretransplant bladder capacity (R=0.466, P<0.001). Bladder capacity expanded more than 6-fold from pretransplantation to posttransplantation, and all recipients had a bladder capacity greater than 150 mL at 1 year posttransplantation. Thirty patients had VUR to the graft. Dialysis duration longer than 60 months (P=0.021) and pretransplant bladder capacity of less than 130 mL (P=0.024) were associated with VUR. VUR was associated with lower graft function. Although bladder capacity decreased because of long-term dialysis, it exceeded 150 mL at 1 year posttransplantation. A small bladder can be used in renal transplantation, but it may increase the risk of VUR.

Correlations between pretransplant dialysis duration, bladder capacity, and prevalence of vesicoureteral reflux to the graft

Correlations between pretransplant dialysis duration, bladder capacity, and prevalence of vesicoureteral reflux to the graft

Impact of hepatorenal syndrome and liver transplantation

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is an extremely detrimental complication of cirrhosis, with dismal survival in untreated patients. Continued advances in understanding the pathophysiology of HRS have improved HRS recognition and facilitated development of effective treatment strategies. In this article, we review current concepts in HRS pathophysiology, guidelines for HRS diagnosis, effective treatment options presently available, and controversies surrounding liver versus liver-kidney transplant in transplant candidates. Published diagnostic criteria for HRS have improved early recognition and intervention in HRS. Increasing data support vasoconstrictor therapy for HRS reversal. Several randomized controlled trials clearly demonstrate efficacy of terlipressin therapy in HRS reversal; although comparable studies are lacking with norepinephrine, preliminary findings suggest that this regime may be the preferred alternative when terlipressin is unavailable for use. In transplant candidates without response to vasoconstrictor therapies, mounting evidence supports simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation if prolonged pretransplant dialysis is required. Prompt identification and therapy initiation in transplant candidates with HRS may improve transplantation rates and posttransplantation outcomes. Future studies identifying optimal vasoconstrictor regimens, alternative therapies, and factors predictive of response to therapy are needed. The appropriate use of simultaneous liver-kidney transplants in patients with HRS remains controversial and requires further analysis by the transplant community.

Rehospitalization After Kidney Transplantation During the First Year: Length, Causes and Relationship With Long-term Patient and Graft Survival

Introduction There is a wide interest in epidemiologic studies assessing different causes of post–kidney transplantation rehospitalization. However, there is a paucity of knowledge on the long-term survival and graft function of rehospitalized kidney transplant recipients during the first year. Knowledge of posttransplant rehospitalization causes may help guide the preventive program at the first year. In our study, we assess causes for hospitalization and investigate the long-term patient and graft survival after non-fatal rehospitalization in kidney recipients during the first year. Materials and methods We retrospectively studied the medical histories of 419 kidney transplant recipients whose operations were performed between 1986 and 2009 at Charles Nicolle Hospital, in Tunis, Tunisia. Among these patients, a total of 296 posttransplant rehospitalizations of kidney transplant recipients during the first year occuring in 191 (45.5%) patients were assessed. Clinical characteristics of the patients, including gender, age, reason for kidney failure, weight, height, blood group, length of pretransplant dialysis, immunosuppressive regimen, postoperative complications, the length of hospital stay, transplantation-admission interval, causes of rehospitalizations, graft loss, and mortality rate were reviewed. For donors, these demographics included age, gender, blood group, type of donor (deceased or living), and relationship to the recipient. Because rehospitalizations are possible for more than one cause, the sum of frequencies of rehospitalization causes is more than 100%. Results There was 1 rehospitalization in 121 patients, 2 rehospitalizations in 47 patients, 3 rehospitalizations in 15 patients, 4 rehospitalizations in 5 patients, 5 rehospitalizations in 2 patients and 6 rehospitalizations in 1 patient. Rehospitalization was more frequent for diabetic patients without significant association. The causes of rehospitalization were infection in 221 cases (55.5%), renal dysfunction in 106 cases (26%), cardiovascular event in 10 cases (2.4%), and diabetic ketoacidosis in 11 cases (2.7%). The length of hospital stay was 22.5 ± 29.6 days, 20.15 ± 22.16 days, 25 ± 30 days and 23.4 ± 27.5 days, respectively, in the first, second, third, and fifth rehospitalizations. Median hospital stay for all rehospitalizations was between 14 and 16 days. The risk factors of rehospitalization were: use of mycophenolate mofetile ( P = .0072), use of cyclosporine ( P = .0073), and cytomegalovirus infection ( P < .001). There was no significant correlation between rehospitalization and either lost of graft and death. Conclusions During the first year after kidney transplantation, rehospitalization was especially required because of infections and renal dysfunction. The risk factors of rehospitalization were cadaveric graft, use of mycophenolate mofetil, use of cyclosporine, and cytomegalovirus infection. To prevent and minimize rehospitalizations during the first year, a specific preventive program based on infection prevention and graft function monitoring should be established.

Poorer graft survival in ethnic minorities: results from a multi-centre UK study of kidney transplant outcomes

The STEPP group was established to investigate factors that affect long-term transplant outcomes including quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes between different transplant centers and patients. Data were collected for 2,650 patients whose first renal transplant took place between 1992 and 2003 in five UK centers. Univariable and multivariable survival analyses were performed using eleven candidate explanatory variables. Graft survival was worse in Black (B) patients (HR B v W 1.57 95% CI 1.10, 2.24), and in South Asian (A) patients (HR A v W 1.39 95% CI 1.03, 1.85) compared to Whites (W) after adjusting for other factors including HLA mismatch, and time on dialysis. Time spent on dialysis pre-transplantation was non-linearly associated with patient, but not death-censored graft survival. Losing a functioning graft was a strong predictor of patient death. One site had both the best graft and the worst patient survival. Differences in patient and graft survival between ethnic groups cannot be explained by currently recognized factors. These, and the complex balance between optimum patient and graft survival which differs between sites in this study require further investigation.

A Comparison of Mycophenolate Mofetil With Mycophenolate Sodium in Renal Transplant Recipients on Tacrolimus-Based Treatment

We compared the tolerability and efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus mycophenolate sodium (MPS) among renal transplant recipients on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. The 105 patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 2002 and March 2008 and were treated with steroid, tacrolimus, and a mycophenolic acid compound were enrolled in the study. From patient files we collected on demographics data, donors, immunosuppressive drug doses, biochemical and hematologic parameters, gastrointestinal and hematologic side effects, and kidney function. Fifty-six patients were prescribed MMF and 49 of them were taking MPS. Demographic parameters and pretransplantation dialysis duration were similar between the 2 groups. After the third month, the MPS dose was higher than that of MMF. There were no clinically important differences between the 2 groups, regarding other immunosuppressive drug doses. Gastrointestinal side effects were similar: 42.4% in the MMF versus 44.8% in the MPS group ( P = .846). Six patients in the MMF group and 1 patient in the MPS group underwent a switch of the mycophenolic acid therapy due to severe gastrointestinal side effects ( P = .183). Biopsy-proven acute rejection was reported in 6 patients on MMF and 7 patients on MPS therapy ( P = .768). The log-rank test evaluating a 50% reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) showed no significant difference between the 2 groups ( P = .719). No deaths were recorded during the study period; there was only 1 graft loss, which occurred in the MMF group. We did not observe a significant difference in tolerability and efficacy between the 2 widely used mycophenolic acid derivatives. Economic considerations can be an important factor when choosing the drug.

The Influence of Hepatitis B and C Virus Infections on Patient and Allograft Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation

Background Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are the most important causes of chronic liver diseases among end-stage kidney disease patients. Our aim was to evaluate the influence of HBV and HCV infections on patient and allograft outcomes after successfull kidney transplantation. Patients and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 592 kidney transplantations performed between December 2008 and August 2010. We compared patient and graft survivals as well as age, gender, immunosuppression status, pretransplant dialysis duration, chronic allograft dysfunction, and causes of death. Results Thirty-two patients (5.4%; group 1) were positive for HCV antibody, whereas 16 (2.7%) were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) (group 2). Two patients (0.3%) were positive concurrently for both HCV antibody and HBsAg. Five hundred forty-two patients (91.6%; group 3) were negative for both. Patients were divided into groups with respect to viral infection. The groups were analyzed for age, gender, immunosuppression, pretransplant dialysis duration, chronic allograft dysfunction, and causes of death, as well as patient and graft outcomes. There were no differences in patient and graft survivals among the groups. None of the patients showed signs of hepatic failure. No patient or graft loss was observed among hepatitis groups when compared with disease-free patients. Conclusion Graft and patient survivals were not influenced by HBV and/or HCV infections. HBV and HCV infections are not contraindications for kidney transplantation.