pre-rRNA Processing In Yeast Research Articles

Maize Shrek1 encodes a WD40 protein that regulates pre-rRNA processing in ribosome biogenesis.

Ribosome biogenesis is a fundamental and highly orchestrated process that involves hundreds of ribosome biogenesis factors. Despite advances that have been made in yeast, the molecular mechanism of ribosome biogenesis remains largely unknown in plants. We uncovered a WD40 protein, Shrunken and Embryo Defective Kernel 1 (SHREK1), and showed that it plays a crucial role in ribosome biogenesis and kernel development in maize (Zea mays). The shrek1 mutant shows an aborted embryo and underdeveloped endosperm and embryo-lethal in maize. SHREK1 localizes mainly to the nucleolus and accumulates to high levels in the seed. Depleting SHREK1 perturbs pre-rRNA processing and causes imbalanced profiles of mature rRNA and ribosome. The expression pattern of ribosomal-related genes is significantly altered in shrek1. Like its yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) ortholog Periodic tryptophan protein 1 (PWP1), SHREK1 physically interacts with ribosomal protein ZmRPL7a, a transient component of the PWP1-subcomplex involved in pre-rRNA processing in yeast. Additionally, SHREK1 may assist in the A3 cleavage of the pre-rRNA in maize by interacting with the nucleolar protein ZmPOP4, a maize homolog of the yeast RNase mitochondrial RNA-processing complex subunit. Overall, our work demonstrates a vital role of SHREK1 in pre-60S ribosome maturation, and reveals that impaired ribosome function accounts for the embryo lethality in shrek1.

Myb-binding Protein 1a (Mybbp1a) Regulates Levels and Processing of Pre-ribosomal RNA

Ribosomal RNA gene transcription, co-transcriptional processing, and ribosome biogenesis are highly coordinated processes that are tightly regulated during cell growth. In this study we discovered that Mybbp1a is associated with both the RNA polymerase I complex and the ribosome biogenesis machinery. Using a reporter assay that uncouples transcription and RNA processing, we show that Mybbp1a represses rRNA gene transcription. In addition, overexpression of the protein reduces RNA polymerase I loading on endogenous rRNA genes as revealed by chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments. Accordingly, depletion of Mybbp1a results in an accumulation of the rRNA precursor in vivo but surprisingly also causes growth arrest of the cells. This effect can be explained by the observation that the modulation of Mybbp1a protein levels results in defects in pre-rRNA processing within the cell. Therefore, the protein may play a dual role in the rRNA metabolism, potentially linking and coordinating ribosomal DNA transcription and pre-rRNA processing to allow for the efficient synthesis of ribosomes.

Yeast Pre-rRNA Processing and Modification Occur Cotranscriptionally

SummaryTo better understand yeast ribosome synthesis, we developed techniques for the rapid harvesting and analysis of metabolically labeled cultures. Modeling of the resulting kinetic data allowed predicted lifetimes and processing patterns to be compared with the experimental data. This supported a transcription time for the 35S primary transcripts of ∼170 s at 30°C (∼40 nt s−1), with a high fraction (∼70%) of nascent transcripts cleaved at the early processing sites that generate the 20S precursor to the 18S rRNA. This level of nascent transcript cleavage apparently conflicted with previous reports that modification of yeast pre-rRNA exclusively occurred on released transcripts. A second round of high-resolution kinetic labeling showed that 20S pre-rRNA predominately undergoes methylation as nascent transcripts, whereas the 27S precursor to the 25S/5.8S rRNAs was partially methylated on the nascent transcript. The results demonstrate that quantitative analyses of pre-rRNA processing can yield important biological insights.

The RNA catabolic enzymes Rex4p, Rnt1p, and Dbr1p show genetic interaction with trans-acting factors involved in processing of ITS1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae pre-rRNA.

Eukaryotes have two types of ribosomes containing either 5.8SL or 5.8SS rRNA that are produced by alternative pre-rRNA processing. The exact processing pathway for the minor 5.8SL rRNA species is poorly documented. We have previously shown that the trans-acting factor Rrp5p and the RNA exonuclease Rex4p genetically interact to influence the ratio between the two forms of 5.8S rRNA in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here we report a further analysis of ITS1 processing in various yeast mutants that reveals genetic interactions between, on the one hand, Rrp5p and RNase MRP, the endonuclease required for 5.8SS rRNA synthesis, and, on the other, Rex4p, the RNase III homolog Rnt1p, and the debranching enzyme Dbr1p. Yeast cells carrying a temperature-sensitive mutation in RNase MRP (rrp2-1) exhibit a pre-rRNA processing phenotype very similar to that of the previously studied rrp5-33 mutant: ITS2 processing precedes ITS1 processing, 5.8SL rRNA becomes the major species, and ITS1 is processed at the recently reported novel site A4 located midway between sites A2 and A3. As in the rrp5-Delta3 mutant, all of these phenotypical processing features disappear upon inactivation of the REX4 gene. Moreover, inactivation of the DBR1 gene in rrp2-1, or the RNT1 gene in rrp5-Delta3 mutant cells also negates the effects of the original mutation on pre-rRNA processing. These data link a total of three RNA catabolic enzymes, Rex4p, Rnt1p, and Dbr1p, to ITS1 processing and the relative production of 5.8SS and 5.8SL rRNA. A possible model for the indirect involvement of the three enzymes in yeast pre-rRNA processing is discussed.

Dynamic conformational model for the role of ITS2 in pre-rRNA processing in yeast.

Maturation of the large subunit rRNAs includes a series of cleavages that result in removal of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) that separates mature 5.8S and 25/28S rRNAs. Previous work demonstrated that formation of higher order secondary structure within the assembling pre-ribosomal particle is a prerequisite for accurate and efficient pre-rRNA processing. To date, it is not clear which specific sequences or secondary structures are required for processing. Two alternative secondary structure models exist for Saccharomyces cerevisiae ITS2. Chemical and enzymatic structure probing and phylogenetic comparisons resulted in one structure (Yeh & Lee, J Mol Biol, 1990, 211:699-712) referred to here as the "hairpin model." More recently, an alternate folded structure was proposed (Joseph et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 1999, 27:4533-4540), called here the "ring model." We have used a functional genetic assay to examine the potential significance of these predicted structures in processing. Our data indicate that elements of both structural models are important in efficient processing. Mutations that prevent formation of ring-specific structures completely blocked production of mature 25S rRNA, whereas those that primarily disrupt hairpin elements resulted in reduced levels of mature product. Based on these results, we propose a dynamic conformational model for the role of ITS2 in processing: Initial formation of the ring structure may be required for essential, early events in processing complex assembly and may be followed by an induced transition to the hairpin structure that facilitates subsequent processing events. In this model, yeast ITS2 elements may provide in cis certain of the functions proposed for vertebrate U8 snoRNA acting in trans.

All three functional domains of the large ribosomal subunit protein L25 are required for both early and late pre-rRNA processing steps in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Mutational analysis has shown that the integrity of the region in domain III of 25S rRNA that is involved in binding of ribosomal protein L25 is essential for the production of mature 25S rRNA in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. However, even structural alterations that do not noticeably affect recognition by L25, as measured by an in vitro assay, strongly reduced 25S rRNA formation by inhibiting the removal of ITS2 from the 27S(B) precursor. In order to analyze the role of L25 in yeast pre-rRNA processing further we studied the effect of genetic depletion of the protein or mutation of each of its three previously identified functional domains, involved in nuclear import (N-terminal), RNA binding (central) and 60S subunit assembly (C-terminal), respectively. Depletion of L25 or mutating its (pre-)rRNA-binding domain blocked conversion of the 27S(B) precursor to 5.8S/25S rRNA, confirming that assembly of L25 is essential for ITS2 processing. However, mutations in either the N- or the C-terminal domain of L25, which only marginally affect its ability to bind to (pre-)rRNA, also resulted in defective ITS2 processing. Furthermore, in all cases there was a notable reduction in the efficiency of processing at the early cleavage sites A0, A1 and A2. We conclude that the assembly of L25 is necessary but not sufficient for removal of ITS2, as well as for fully efficient cleavage at the early sites. Additional elements located in the N- as well as C-terminal domains of L25 are required for both aspects of pre-rRNA processing.

Role of the ITS2-proximal stem and evidence for indirect recognition of processing sites in pre-rRNA processing in yeast.

Eucaryotic ribosome biogenesis involves many cis-acting sequences and trans-acting factors, including snoRNAS: We have used directed mutagenesis of rDNA plasmids in yeast to identify critical sequence and structural elements within and flanking the ITS2-proximal stem. This base paired structure, present in the mature ribosome, is formed between the 5'-end of 25S and the 3'-end of 5.8S rRNAS: Previously we demonstrated that formation of this structure was critical for pre-rRNA processing in yeast. Here we show that there are no sequence-specific recognition elements within the ITS2-proximal stem, rather the structure of this stem is critical for processing. This stem cannot exceed a specific length, but there are different length restrictions for different regions within this tripartite stem. Neither the conserved unpaired nucleotides within the stem nor the sequence of the mature rRNA at the processing sites are required for processing. Collectively, these results suggest a measuring model whereby initial cleavage within ITS2 at the C2 processing site and termination of subsequent exonuclease activity yielding the mature termini are affected by the relative position of sequence and structural elements within the ITS2-proximal stem.

The structure of the ITS2-proximal stem is required for pre-rRNA processing in yeast.

Accurate and efficient processing of pre-rRNA is critical to the accumulation of mature functional ribosomal subunits for maintenance of cell growth. Processing requires numerous factors which act in trans as well as RNA sequence/ structural elements which function in cis. To examine the latter, we have used directed mutagenesis and expression of mutated pre-rRNAs in yeast. Specifically, we tested requirements for formation of an ITS2-proximal stem on processing, a structure formed by an interaction between sequences corresponding to the 3' end of 5.8S rRNA and the 5' end of 25S. Pre-rRNA processing is inhibited in templates encoding mutations that prevent the formation of the ITS2-proximal stem. Compensatory, double mutations, which alter the sequence of this region but restore the structure of the stem, also restore processing, although at lower efficiency. This reduction in efficiency is reflected in decreased levels of mature 5.8S and 25S rRNA and increased levels of 35S pre-rRNA and certain processing intermediates. This phenotype is reminiscent of the biochemical depletion of U8 snoRNA in vertebrates for which the ITS2-proximal stem has been proposed as a potential site for interaction with U8 RNP. Thus, formation of the ITS2-proximal stem may be a requirement common to yeast and vertebrate pre-rRNA processing.

The role of the 3′ external transcribed spacer in yeast pre-rRNA processing

We have undertaken a deletion analysis of the 3′ external transcribed spacer (3′ ETS) in the pre-rRNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A stem loop structure immediately 3′ to the 25 S rRNA region is necessary and sufficient for processing of the 3′ ETS. This is believed to be by cotranscriptional cleavage by Rnt1p, the yeast homologue of RNase III. In addition, this stem-loop is required for cleavage of site A 3 by RNase MRP and for processing at site B 1L, in the 3′ region of ITS1. Processing at an upstream site in ITS1, site A 2, and at sites in the 5′ external transcribed spacer are not affected, even by complete deletion of the 3′ ETS. We conclude that processing in the 3′ ETS and in ITS1 is coupled. This would constitute a quality control that prevents synthesis of the 5.8 S rRNA and 5′ end maturation of the 25 S rRNA in transcripts which are incomplete due to premature transcription termination.

Trans-acting factors in yeast pre-rRNA and pre-snoRNA processing.

The major intermediates in the pathway of pre-rRNA processing in yeast and other eukaryotes were originally identified by biochemical analyses. However, as a result of the analysis of the effects of mutations in trans-acting factors, the yeast pre-rRNA processing pathway is now characterized in far more detail than that of other eukaryotes. These analyses have led to the identification of processing sites and intermediates that were either too close in size or too short lived to detected by biochemical analyses alone. In addition, it was generally unclear whether pre-rRNA processing steps were endonucleolytic or exonucleolytic; analyses of trans-acting factors is now revealing a complex mixture of endonucleolytic and exonucleolytic processing steps. Many of the small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are excised from larger precursors. Analyses of trans-acting factors are also revealing details of pre-snoRNA processing in yeast. Interestingly, factors involved in pre-snoRNA processing turn out to be components that also function in pre-rRNA processing, suggesting a potential mechanism for the coregulation of rRNA and snoRNA synthesis. In general, very little is known about the regulation of pre-rRNA processing steps. The best candidate for a system regulating specific pre-rRNA processing reactions has recently been revealed by the analysis of a yeast pre-RNA methylase. Here we will review recent data on the trans-acting factors involved in yeast ribosome synthesis and discuss how these analyses have contributed to our current view of this complex process.

Processing of pre‐ribosomal RNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Post-transcriptional processing of precursor-ribosomal RNA comprises a complex pathway of endonucleolytic cleavages, exonucleolytic digestion and covalent modifications. The general order of the various processing steps is well conserved in eukaryotic cells, but the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. Recent analysis of pre-rRNA processing, mainly in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has significantly improved our understanding of this important cellular activity. Here we will review the data that have led to our current picture of yeast pre-rRNA processing.

GAR1 is an essential small nucleolar RNP protein required for pre-rRNA processing in yeast.

Among the few proteins of the eukaryotic nucleolus that have been characterized, four proteins, nucleolin, fibrillarin, SSB1 and NSR1, possess a common structural motif, the GAR domain, which is rich in glycine and arginine residues. In order to examine whether the presence of this domain is characteristic of a family of nucleolar proteins, we investigated whether other yeast genes encode proteins containing GAR domains. We report here the sequence and the characterization of a new yeast gene, GAR1, which encodes a protein of 205 residues containing two GAR domains. GAR1 is a non-ribosomal protein, localized in the yeast nucleolus, which is essential for cell growth. Immunoprecipitation with anti-GAR1 antibodies shows that GAR1 is associated with a subset of snoRNAs, including snR10 and snR30. Depletion of GAR1 by expression under the control of a regulated GAL promoter, impairs processing of the 35S primary transcript of pre-rRNA and prevents synthesis of 18S rRNA. GAR1 is thus the fifth member of a family of nucleolar proteins containing GAR domains, and is involved in rRNA metabolism.

The small nucleolar RNP protein NOP1 (fibrillarin) is required for pre-rRNA processing in yeast.

The yeast snoRNP protein, NOP1, is structurally and functionally homologous to vertebrate fibrillarin and is essential for viability. A conditionally lethal allele was constructed by placing NOP1 expression under the control of a GAL promoter. Growth on glucose medium results in the depletion of NOP1 over several generations, during which cell growth is progressively impaired. Pulse labelling of proteins shows that NOP1 depleted strains are greatly impaired in the production of cytoplasmic ribosomes, and they have a reduced level of rRNA. Northern hybridization and pulse-chase labelling of pre-rRNA show a progressive impairment of all pre-rRNA processing steps. The pathway leading to 18S rRNA is particularly affected. Methylation of pre-rRNA is concomitantly impaired and unmethylated pre-rRNA accumulates and is not processed over long periods. NOP1 depletion does not prevent the accumulation of seven snoRNAs tested including U3; the levels of two species, U14 and snR190, decline. The snoRNAs synthesized in the absence of NOP1 retain TMG cap structures. Subnuclear fractionation and immunocytochemistry indicate that they continue to be localized in the nucleolus.

Functional analysis of transcribed spacers of yeast ribosomal DNA.

Making use of an rDNA unit, containing oligonucleotide tags in both the 17S and 26S rRNA gene, we have analyzed the effect of various deletions in the External Transcribed Spacer (ETS) and in one of the Internal Transcribed Spacers 1 (ITS1) on the process of ribosome formation in yeast. By following the fate of the tagged transcripts of this rDNA unit in vivo by Northern hybridization we found that deleting various parts of the ETS prevents the accumulation of tagged 17S rRNA and its assembly into 40S subunits, but not the formation of 60S subunits. Deleting the central region of ITS1, including a processing site that is used in an early stage of the maturation process, was also found to prevent the accumulation of functional 49 S subunits, whereas no effect on the formation of 60S subunits was detected. The implications of these findings for yeast pre-rRNA processing are discussed.