Background Primary hyperparathyroidism is an endocrinopathy associated with dysregulated calcium homeostasis. The most common etiology is a parathyroid adenoma most definitely managed via a parathyroidectomy. The two main surgical approaches include a minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) and open four-gland exploration (4-GE). MIP is the preferred operative strategy since it is associated with less postoperative complications. Accurate preoperative imaging is essential in informing the optimal approach to surgery. MIP is only considered if adenoma is able to be localized precisely. The most commonly used imaging modality includes ultrasound and sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT, either as a singleor combination strategy. Other options include MRI, PET, and 4D CT. There is no universally accepted preoperative imaging strategy. The literature is discordant and recommendations proposed by existing guidelines are incongruous. Objectives This study aimed to evaluate currently utilized preoperative parathyroid imaging modalities at our institution and correlate them with surgical and histological findings to determine the most efficient imaging strategy to detect adenomas for our patient cohort. This will ultimately guide the best surgical approach for patients receiving parathyroidectomies. Methods This is a retrospective observational study of all patients undergoing first-time surgery for biochemically proven primary hyperparathyroidism at our institution over the past five years. Multiple data points were collected including modality of preoperative disease localization, operation type, final histopathology, biochemical investigations, and cure rate. Patients were categorized into one of three groups based on the method of disease localization. Results A total of 244 patients had parathyroidectomies performed at our institution in the past five years from January 2018 to December 2022. Ninety-six percent (n=235) of all patients received dual imaging preoperatively with SPECT/CT and ultrasound performed on the same day and therefore included in this study. A total of 64.3% (n=151) underwent MIP. Eighty percent (n=188) of all histopathology revealed adenomas and 26.8% (n=63) of patients had adenoma localized on SPECT/CT only (sensitivity: 58.1%, specificity: 71%, and positive predictive value {PPV}: 85.7%). A total of 9.8% (n=23) had adenoma localized on ultrasound only (sensitivity: 15.6%, specificity: 73.3%, and PPV: 65.2%). A total of 45.1% (n=106) were dual localized on both SPECT/CT and ultrasound (sensitivity: 75.6%, specificity: 46.6%, and PPV: 84.9%). The cure rate was 91.5% in the dual-localized group, 86% in the dual-unlocalized group, and 96.5% when localized with SPECT/CT alone. Conclusion A dual-imaging modality with SPECT/CT and ultrasound should remain the first-line imaging strategy. This approach has higher sensitivity rates and poses no inherent patient or surgical-related risks. Patients with disease unlocalized on SPECT/CT alone had a positive predictive value, specificity, and likelihood ratio for adenoma detection comparable to dual-localized patients. Therefore, SPECT/CT alone is sufficient for directing MIP in the presence of a negative ultrasound.