Preoperative Biliary Drainage Research Articles

Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on intraoperative biliary cultures and surgical outcomes after pancreatic resection

Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on intraoperative biliary cultures and surgical outcomes after pancreatic resection

Inside stent placement is suitable for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Background/PurposeEndoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) is commonly used for preoperative drainage of localized perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (LPHC). This study retrospectively compared the utility of inside stent (IS) and conventional stent (CS) for preoperative EBS in patients with LPHC.MethodsEBS was performed in 56 patients with LPHC. EBS involved the placement of a CS (n = 32) or IS (n = 24). Treatment outcomes were compared between these two groups.ResultsPreoperative recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) occurred in 23 patients (71.9%) in the CS group and 7 (29.2%) in the IS group, with a significant difference (p = 0.002). The time to RBO (TRBO) was significantly longer in IS than in CS (log-rank: p < 0.001). The number of stent replacements was significantly lower in IS than CS [0.38 (0–3) vs. 1.88 (0–8), respectively; p < 0.001]. Gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was administered to 26 patients (46.4%). Among patients who received NAC, TRBO was longer in IS than in CS group (log-rank: p < 0.001). The IS group had a significantly shorter preoperative and postoperative hospital stay than the CS group (20.0 vs. 37.0 days; p = 0.024, and 33.5 vs. 41.5 days; p = 0.016). Both the preoperative and the postoperative costs were significantly lower in the IS group than in the CS group (p = 0.049 and p = 0.0034, respectively).ConclusionCompared with CS, IS for preoperative EBS in LPHC patients resulted in fewer complications and lower re-intervention rates. The fact that the IS group had shorter preoperative and postoperative hospital stays and lower costs both preoperatively and postoperatively compared to the CS group may suggest that the use of IS has the potential to benefit not only the patient but also the healthcare system.

Frailty Assessment for Risk Stratification in Pancreatic Surgery – Results of a Single-Center Cohort Study

Abstract Background Large cohort studies found an increase in frailty with age. Age is a known risk factor for pancreatic cancer. Seventy percent of new diagnoses are made in patients aged more than 65 years. Pancreatic resections represent the only hope for cure but are associated with high morbidity. The definition “fit for pancreatic surgery”, currently mainly based on age and comorbidities, is continuously challenged. Aims The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes after pancreatic resections. Methods Data of consecutive patients undergoing pancreatic resections between January 2015 and July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative complications were graded by the Clavien-Dindo Classification, Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) and complications specific to pancreatic resections as recommended and published by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. The modified frailty index (mFI) was defined by 11 variables. An mFI score above 0.27 was set to define frailty. Results A pancreatic resection was performed in 159 patients, of which 23 (15%) were classified as frail. Pancreatoduodenectomies were similarly distributed in both groups. Frail patients were older (median of 74 vs. 69 years). Male gender was associated with frailty (83%, p=0.001)., Moreover, frailty was associated with an increased rate of preoperative biliary drainage. Although intensive care stay was increased in the frail group (median 3 vs. 0 days; p=0.01), total length of hospital stay was not affected. Frailty was associated with severe complications as defined by a comprehensive complication index &amp;gt;50 (35% vs. 10%; p=0.003), an increased rate of severe type C pancreatic fistula (13% vs. 2%, p=0.04), and a higher 90-day mortality (13% vs. 2%, p=0.04). Conclusion Assessment of frailty should be used for preoperative risk stratification since frailty is associated with a higher morbidity and mortality after pancreatic resections.

Delayed gastric emptying after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center experience of 827 cases

BackgroundDelayed gastric emptying (DGE) commonly occurs after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Risk factors for DGE have been reported in open PD but are rarely reported in laparoscopic PD (LPD). This study was designed to evaluate the perioperative risk factors for DGE and secondary DGE after LPD in a single center.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent LPD between October 2014 and April 2023. Demographic data, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected. The risk factors for DGE and secondary DGE were analyzed.ResultsA total of 827 consecutive patients underwent LPD. One hundred and forty-two patients (17.2%) developed DGE of any type. Sixty-five patients (7.9%) had type A, 62 (7.5%) had type B, and the remaining 15 (1.8%) had type C DGE. Preoperative biliary drainage (p = 0.032), blood loss (p = 0.014), and 90-day any major complication with Dindo-Clavien score ≥ III (p < 0.001) were independent significant risk factors for DGE. Seventy-six (53.5%) patients were diagnosed with primary DGE, whereas 66 (46.5%) patients had DGE secondary to concomitant complications. Higher body mass index, soft pancreatic texture, and perioperative transfusion were independent risk factors for secondary DGE. Hospital stay and drainage tube removal time were significantly longer in the DGE and secondary DGE groups.ConclusionIdentifying patients at an increased risk of DGE and secondary DGE can be used to intervene earlier, avoid potential risk factors, and make more informed clinical decisions to shorten the duration of perioperative management.

The Learning Curve for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Experience of a Single Surgeon.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex and high-skill demanding procedure often associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, the results have improved over the past two decades. However, there is a paucity of research concerning the learning curve for PD. Our aim was to report the outcomes of 100 consecutive PDs representing a single surgeon's learning curve and to depict the factors that influenced the learning process. We reviewed the first 121 PDs performed at our academic center (2013-2019) by a single surgeon; 110 were PDs (5 laparoscopic and 105 open) and 11 were total PDs (1 laparoscopic and 10 open). Subsequent statistics was performed on the first 100 PDs, with attention paid to the learning curve and survival rate at 5 years. The data were analyzed comparing the first 50 cases (Group 1) to the last 50 cases (Group 2). The most frequent histopathological tumor type was pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (50%). A total of 39% of patients had preoperative biliary drainage and 45% presented with positive biliary cultures. The preferred reconstruction technique included pancreaticogastrostomy (99%), in situ hepaticojejunostomy (70%), and precolic gastro-jejunal anastomosis (88%). Postoperative complications included biliary fistula (1%), pancreatic fistula (8%), pancreatic stump bleeding (4%), and delayed gastric emptying (13%). The mean operative time decreased after the first 50 cases (p < 0.001) and blood loss after 60 cases (p = 0.046). R1 resections lowered after 25 cases (p = 0.025). Vascular resections (17%) did not influence the rate of complications (p = 0.8). The survival rate at 5 years for pancreatic adenocarcinoma was 32.93%. Outcomes improve as surgeon experience increases, with proper training being the most important factor for minimizing the impact of the learning curve over the postoperative complications. Analyzing the learning curve from the perspective of a single surgeon is mandatory for accurate statistical results and interpretation.

Effects of preoperative biliary drainage on the outcomes of surgical treatment in cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis

BackgroundHyperbilirubinemia is known to increase morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing liver resection for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) in patients who have no acute cholangitis or require portal vein embolization is still debatable. The goal of this study is to investigate how PBD affects the surgical results after liver resection. MethodsBetween October 2013 and December 2020, CCA patients presenting with obstructive jaundice who underwent liver resection were retrospectively reviewed. The pre-operative, peri-operative and post-operative characteristics were extracted. To compare the outcomes of the PBD and direct surgery groups, propensity score matching analysis (PSM) and multivariable risk regression analysis were used to analyze. ResultsA total of 355 patients were enrolled, with 99 of them undergoing PBD. At diagnosis, those with PBD showed significantly greater bilirubin levels than those without (20.7 vs 9.6 ​mg/dL, p ​< ​0.001). However, after drainage, the bilirubin level in the PBD group was lower than the direct surgery group (5.5 vs 9.6 ​mg/dL, p ​< ​0.001). Overall postoperative morbidity and mortality were unaffected by PBD in full patient cohort. However, after PSM, PBD was associated with decreased major post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and 90-day mortality rate, (20.3% vs 39.24%, p ​= ​0.014 and 3.8% vs 22.8%, p ​= ​0.001, respectively). At multivariable analysis of PSM patient cohort, PBD was associated with decreased major post-operative complication (RR 0.64, 95%CI 0.419–0.986), PHLF (RR 0.40, 95%CI 0.227–0.705) and 90-day mortality (RR 0.21, 95%CI 0.086–0.629). ConclusionPBD was associated with decreased post-hepatectomy liver failure and postoperative mortality after liver resection in jaundiced CCA patients.

Current status of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage for distal and hilar biliary obstruction

Current status of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage for distal and hilar biliary obstruction

Pancreaticoduodenectomy after bilirubin adsorption for distal cholangiocarcinoma with severe obstructive jaundice refractory to repeat preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage: a case report.

The necessity of biliary drainage before pancreaticoduodenectomy remains controversial in cases involving malignant obstructive jaundice; however, the benefits of biliary drainage have been reported in cases with severe hyperbilirubinemia. Herein, we present the case of a 61-year-old man suffering from jaundice due to distal cholangiocarcinoma. In this case, obstructive jaundice was refractory to repeat endoscopic drainage and bilirubin adsorption. Hyperbilirubinemia persisted despite successful implementation of biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy and two rounds of plastic stent placements. Stent occlusion and migration were unlikely and oral cholagogues proved ineffective. Owing to the patient's surgical candidacy and his aversion to nasobiliary drainage due to discomfort, bilirubin adsorption was introduced as an alternative therapeutic intervention. Following repeated adsorption sessions, a gradual decline in serum total bilirubin levels was observed and pancreaticoduodenectomy was scheduled. The patient successfully underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein resection and reconstruction and D2 lymph node dissection. After the surgery, the serum bilirubin levels gradually decreased and the patient remained alive, with no recurrence at 26months postoperatively. Therefore, this case highlights the feasibility and safety of performing pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with severe, refractory jaundice who have not responded to repeated endoscopic interventions and have partially responded to bilirubin adsorption.

Novel definition of textbook outcome in biliary system cancers and its influence on patients' survival and quality of life.

The definition of textbook outcome in biliary system cancers is a developing concept in need of expansion and investigation of its association with survival and quality of life. In this original research, we developed a novel "all or none" textbook outcome definition which addresses the rapid recovery of post-surgical indexes, in addition to short-term mortality, hospital re-admission, prolonged stay, surgical margin and postoperative complications. Based on the fulfillment of relevant criteria, patients were divided into textbook outcome and non-textbook outcome groups and their characteristics and survival data were analyzed. A customized "quality of life" questionnaire was developed to address short-term recovery and post-discharge life quality of patients. Association with quality of life improvement was then investigated. A total of 129 patients were included. Textbook outcome was achieved in 25.58% of patients (37.04% of gallbladder cancer patients and 17.8% of cholangiocarcinoma patients). Compared to non-textbook outcome group, patients with textbook outcome had lower rate of pre-operative biliary drainage (p = 0.026), higher rate of normal preoperative liver function (p < 0.001) and tumor markers (p = 0.001), reduced perioperative bleeding (p = 0.006) and blood transfusion (p = 0.005), and higher rate of N0 stage cases (p = 0.008). Textbook outcome was also associated with enhanced survival, significantly in older patients (<65 years) (1-year survival rate: 100% vs. 78.57% (p = 0.108), 2-year survival rate: 87.5% vs. 44% (p = 0.046)). Finally, textbook outcome was significantly associated with enhanced basic daily performance (p < 0.001), social life performance (p = 0.033), and personal evaluation (p < 0.001), and thus improved quality of life (p < 0.001). The novel definition of textbook outcome was able to address the specific nature of recovery after resection of biliary system cancers. Expanding the scope of textbook outcome and addressing the influence on survival and quality of life provides a comprehensive concept able to reflect physical, psychological and functioning enhancements in patients recovery.

Outcomes of 6-mm diameter fully covered self-expandable metal stents for preoperative biliary drainage in pancreatic cancer.

10-mm self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are commonly used for preoperative biliary drainage in pancreatic cancer. However, smaller diameter SEMSs have attracted attention with the attempt to reduce stent-related adverse events (AEs). We retrospectively analyzed consecutive borderline resectable pancreatic cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) placement from April 2015 to May 2023. The primary outcome was stent-related non-event rate (NER), which was defined as the rate of completion of surgery without developing any preoperative events (recurrent biliary obstruction [RBO] or stent-related AEs). Secondary outcomes included stent-related AEs, causes of RBO, and cumulative incidence of RBO. Risk factors for pancreatitis, RBO, and stent migration were also examined. A total of 76 patients were included (6-mm group: 23; 10-mm group: 53). Stent-related NER (57% vs. 64%, p = 0.610), stent-related AEs (4% vs. 15%, p = 0.263), overall RBO rates (39% vs. 23%, p = 0.168), cumulative incidence of RBO (hazard ratio, 2.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-5.25; p = 0.065) were not significantly different between the two groups. Tumor involvement of the pancreatic duct was identified as a risk-reducing factor for pancreatitis, while an FCSEMS diameter of 6 mm was not identified as a risk factor for RBO and stent migration. Stent-related NER was not significantly affected by FCSEMS diameter. Further studies are needed to confirm the usefulness of 6-mm diameter FCSEMS for preoperative biliary drainagein patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

The impact of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative healthcare-associated infections and clinical outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a ten-year retrospective analysis

BackgroundPancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex procedure and easily accompanied by healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). This study aimed to assess the impact of PBD on postoperative infections and clinical outcomes in PD patients.MethodsThe retrospective cohort study were conducted in a tertiary hospital from January 2013 to December 2022. Clinical and epidemiological data were collected from HAIs surveillance system and analyzed.ResultsAmong 2842 patients who underwent PD, 247 (8.7%) were diagnosed with HAIs, with surgical site infection being the most frequent type (n = 177, 71.7%). A total of 369 pathogenic strains were detected, with Klebsiella pneumoniae having the highest proportion, followed by Enterococcu and Escherichia coli. Although no significant association were observed generally between PBD and postoperative HAIs, subgroup analysis revealed that PBD was associated with postoperative HAIs in patients undergoing robotic PD (aRR = 2.174; 95% CI:1.011–4.674; P = 0.047). Prolonging the interval between PBD and PD could reduce postoperative HAIs in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (≥4 week: aRR = 0.292, 95% CI 0.100–0.853; P = 0.024) and robotic PD (≤2 week: aRR = 3.058, 95% CI 1.178–7.940; P = 0.022). PBD was also found to increase transfer of patients to ICU (aRR = 1.351; 95% CI 1.119–1.632; P = 0.002), extended length of stay (P < 0.001) and postoperative length of stay (P = 0.004).ConclusionPBD does not exhibit a significant association with postoperative HAIs or other outcomes. However, the implementation of robotic PD, along with a suitable extension of the interval between PBD and PD, appear to confer advantages concerning patients’ physiological recuperation. These observations suggest potential strategies that may contribute to enhanced patient outcomes.

Abstract 2399: Stage-matched prognosis comparison between ypTNM and pTNM stage in pancreatic cancer

Abstract Introduction: The prognostic significance of pathological stage in pancreatic cancer is well-established. The 8th American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging introduced the ypTNM stage for neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) patients responding to the increased use of NAT. Despite this, there has been no comparative assessment of the prognosis between ypTNM and pTNM stages in pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the prognoses between ypTNM and pTNM stages in surgically resected pancreatic cancer. Method: A cohort of 586 patients who underwent pancreatic cancer surgery at a tertiary center from January 2018 to March 2022 was analyzed. Exclusions comprised those with prior pancreatectomy, suspicious liver metastasis or peritoneal seeding before NAT, those with open biopsy, R2 resection, and distant metastasis during operation, and postoperative mortalities or immediate follow-up losses. Clinicopathologic demographics underwent analysis, and a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis (1:3) was conducted based on factors influencing overall survival (OS) in multivariate analysis. Subgroup analyses, categorized by stage, compared survival between ypTNM and pTNM stages. Results: The analysis included 541 patients, with 100 undergoing NAT (ypTNM) and 441 opting for upfront surgery (pTNM). Comparable OS was observed between ypTNM and pTNM patients (median 51.0 vs. 46.0 months, 3-year survival rate (YSR) 68.7% vs 56.3%, p = 0.094). Subgroup analysis by stages I (3YSR 76.8% vs 67.5%, p = 0.577), II (56.2% vs 53.0%, p = 0.715), and III (26.5% vs 28.7%, p = 0.596) revealed similar survival between ypTNM and pTNM. Multivariate analysis identified factors such as age &amp;gt;65 (HR 1.651, p = 0.002), CA19-9 &amp;gt;150 (HR 1.476, p = 0.010), preoperative biliary drainage (HR 1.372, p = 0.048), pathologic T2 stage (HR 2.188, p = 0.002) and T3, 4 stage (HR 3.178, p &amp;lt; 0.001) compared to T0, 1 stage, lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.087, p &amp;lt; 0.001), and adjuvant treatment (HR 0.243, p &amp;lt; 0.001) associated with OS. After PSM analysis, stages I (3YSR 76.8% vs 71.7%, p = 0.923), II (56.2% vs 46.6%, p = 0.886), and III (26.5% vs 31.4%, p = 0.856) exhibited no significant difference in OS between ypTNM and pTNM stages. Conclusions: Our study underscores comparable survival outcomes between ypTNM and pTNM stages in surgically resected pancreatic cancer, affirming the applicability of the TNM staging system after NAT. Consistent survival results, even following PSM analysis, highlight the reliability of TNM staging for guiding therapeutic decisions even in patients with NAT. Citation Format: Hyeong Seok Kim, Hochang Chae, Soo Yeun Lim, Hye Jeong Jeong, So Jeong Yoon, Sang Hyun Shin, In Woong Han, Jin Seok Heo, Hongbeom Kim. Stage-matched prognosis comparison between ypTNM and pTNM stage in pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2399.

National guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

A consensus meeting of national experts from all major national hepatobiliary centres in the country was held on May 26, 2023, at the Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre (PKLI & RC) after initial consultations with the experts. The Pakistan Society for the Study of Liver Diseases (PSSLD) and PKLI & RC jointly organised this meeting. This effort was based on a comprehensive literature review to establish national practice guidelines for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (hCCA). The consensus was that hCCA is a complex disease and requires a multidisciplinary team approach to best manage these patients. This coordinated effort can minimise delays and give patients a chance for curative treatment and effective palliation. The diagnostic and staging workup includes high-quality computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Brush cytology or biopsy utilizing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a mainstay for diagnosis. However, histopathologic confirmation is not always required before resection. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration of regional lymph nodes and positron emission tomography scan are valuable adjuncts for staging. The only curative treatment is the surgical resection of the biliary tree based on the Bismuth-Corlette classification. Selected patients with unresectable hCCA can be considered for liver transplantation. Adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered to patients with a high risk of recurrence. The use of preoperative biliary drainage and the need for portal vein embolisation should be based on local multidisciplinary discussions. Patients with acute cholangitis can be drained with endoscopic or percutaneous biliary drainage. Palliative chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine has shown improved survival in patients with irresectable and recurrent hCCA.

Safety of biliary drainage with 6-mm metallic stent for preoperative obstructive jaundice in pancreatic cancer: PURPLE SIX STUDY.

The 10-mm self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) is the standard for endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage before pancreatic cancer surgery. However, the efficacy of stents thinner than 10mm has not been adequately validated. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the safety of a 6-mm fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) for distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) during preoperative chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. This was a single-arm, multicenter, prospective phase II study of endoscopic transpapillary initial biliary drainage for DMBO before pancreatic cancer surgery. The primary endpoint was stent-related adverse events, and the key secondary endpoint was the non-recurrent biliary obstruction (non-RBO) rate during the observation period for both resectable (R) and borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic cancers. The study enrolled 33 patients, among whom 32 received the study treatment. There were 23 and 9 cases of R and BR pancreatic cancers, respectively. The technical and clinical success rates were 97.0% and 90.1%, respectively. The stent-related adverse event rate was 3.1% (n=1, acute pancreatitis) (95% confidential interval, 0.00-16.2), which met the criteria to be considered safe. The overall non-RBO rate during the observation period (median 96days) was 78.1% (82.6% and 66.7% for R and BR pancreatic cancer cases, respectively). The 6-mm FCSEMS is an extremely safe metallic stent with a low stent-related adverse event rate of 3.1% for preoperative biliary drainage in pancreatic cancer. It is considered the optimal stent for preoperative biliary drainage in terms of the non-RBO rate. UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN-CTR 000041704).

Survival analysis of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

Background/purposeThis study compared the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic versus open resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) and analyzed potential prognostic factors.MethodsThe study included patients who underwent HCCA resection at our center from March 2012 to February 2022. Perioperative complications and postoperative prognosis were compared between the laparoscopic surgery (LS) and open surgery (OS) groups.ResultsAfter screening 313 HCCA patients, 68 patients were eligible for the study in the LS group (n = 40) and OS group (n = 28). Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis revealed that overall survival > 2 years and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) were more common in the LS than OS group, but the rate of 2-year DFS was lower in the LS group than OS group. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed age (< 65 years), radical resection, and postoperative adjuvant therapy were associated with reduced risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.380, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.150–0.940, P = 0.036; HR = 0.080, 95% CI = 0.010–0.710, P = 0.024 and HR = 0.380, 95% CI = 0.150–0.960, P = 0.040), whereas preoperative biliary drainage was an independent factor associated with increased risk of death (HR = 2.810, 95% CI = 1.130–6.950, P = 0.026). Perineuronal invasion was identified as an independent risk factor affecting DFS (HR = 5.180, 95% CI = 1.170–22.960, P = 0.030).ConclusionsCompared with OS, laparoscopic HCCA resection does not significantly differ in terms of clinical efficacy. Age (<65 years), radical resection, and postoperative adjuvant therapy reduce the risk of death, and preoperative biliary drainage increases the risk of death.

Trends of Endoscopic Palliation for Advanced Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction

Malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHO), an aggressive type of perihilar biliary obstruction caused by cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, or other metastatic malignancies, has a poor prognosis. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for biliary malignancies. However, most patients with MHO cannot undergo surgery upon presentation because of their advanced inoperable state or poor performance resulting from old age or comorbid diseases. Therefore, palliative biliary drainage is required to improve symptomatic jaundice and quality of life. Preoperative biliary drainage is controversial in resectable cases of MHO. Preoperative biliary drainage should be considered according to specific selection criteria. Palliative drainage is currently the mainstay of symptomatic treatment. Compared with percutaneous access, primary endoscopic palliation using plastic or metal stents has recently shown higher technical feasibility and clinical success without increasing the frequency of adverse events, even in high-degree MHO. However, the use of stents still has numerous limitations, including challenges in determining the optimal type of stent, number of stents, deployment method, and additional local therapies. Therefore, this report presents the current optimal endoscopic drainage status for MHO based on recent guidelines and published literature.

Will Endoscopic-Ultrasound-Guided Choledocoduodenostomy with Electrocautery-Enhanced Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent Placement Replace Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography When Treating Distal Malignant Biliary Obstructions?

Malignant distal biliary obstructions are becoming increasingly common, especially in patients with cancers of the pancreatic head, despite progress in medical oncology research. ERCP is the current gold standard for management of such strictures, but the emergence of EC-LAMS has rendered EUS-CDS both safe and efficient. It is a "game changer"; originally intended for ERCP failure, two randomised clinical trials recently proposed EUS-CDS as a first-intent procedure in palliative settings. For resectable diseases, the absence of iatrogenic pancreatitis associated with a lower rate of postsurgical adverse events (compared with ERCP) leads us to believe that EUS-CDS might be used in first-intent as a pre-operative endoscopic biliary drainage.

Safety and feasibility of preoperative simultaneous portal vein embolization and biliary drainage in hilar cholangiocarcinoma prior to hepatectomy

Purpose: Evaluate safety and feasibility of simultaneous biliary drainage (BD) and portal vein embolization (PVE) prior to hepatectomy in hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) patients. Methods: From January 2010 to June 2022, patients with potentially surgically resectable HCCA who underwent preoperative PVE and BD were analyzed. Type of initial BD, time interval between BD and PVE, changes in future liver remnant (FLR), time interval between BD, PVE and resection, and complications were recorded. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the BD-PVE interval: Group A: simultaneous BD and PVE or within 7 days (d), n = 6; Group B: d ≥ 7 to ≤ 30, n = 7; Group C: d &gt; 30, n = 14). Primary endpoints were post-PVE complications, FLR change, and resection rate. Secondary endpoints were Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3, Grade B/C Post Hepatectomy Liver Failure (PHLF) and 90 days mortality rate. Results: A total of 27 patients (mean age = 64.4 +/- 11.2 years) underwent both BD and PVE prior to hepatectomy. Mean degree of hypertrophy at 4-6 weeks post-PVE was 10.4 +/- 3.7% with no significant difference between the 3 groups (p &gt; 0.05). Resection was 67% in Group A, and 57% and 36% in groups B and C respectively (p &lt; 0.05). Time to surgery was 38.5 +/- 12 days in Group A, and 60 and 147 days in groups B and C respectively (p = 0.002). No major post PVE SIR complication was reported in group A. Overall rate of Grade III/IV Clavien-Dindo complication was 61.5% with no difference among the three groups (50%, 75%, and 60%; groups A, B and C, respectively). Overall PHLF Grade B/C was reported in 46.2% of patients. No patients in Group A demonstrated Grade B/C PHLF. Conclusion: Simultaneous BD and PVE is safe and reduces the time to surgery, which may help contribute to a higher rate of surgical resection.

Preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage procedures may affect intrahepatic recurrence of cholangiocarcinoma after surgical resection.

468 Background: To determine the impact of preoperative endoscopic nasal biliary drainage (ENBD) and/or endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) procedures on intrahepatic recurrence rate in patients with cholangiocarcinoma after surgical resection. Methods: Between January 2005 and January 2023, 143 patients diagnosed cholangiocarcinoma and received surgical resection. Among 143 patients, 99 patients were treated with preoperative ENBD and/or ERBD. We retrospectively analysed prognostic factors (age, gender, preoperative ENBD and/or ERBD, tumor differentiation, pT factor, lymph node metastasis, surgical margin, lymphovascular invasion, preoperative maximal total bilirubin, postoperative chemoradiation/chemotherapy/radiation therapy, CA19-9) for recurrence after surgical resection. Results: Intrahepatic recurrence after surgical resection was detected in 22 /99(22.2%) patients with preoperative ENBD and/or ERBD, and 5/44(11.4%) patients without preoperative ENBD and/or ERBD for median period of 12 months (range 0-48). On univariate analysis, intrahepatic recurrence rate of patients who underwent ENBD and/or ERBD (n=99) was higher than that of patients who did not (n=44) ( P=0.090) and and that of patients who had T3/T4 factor (n=74) was higher than that of who had T1/T2 factor (n=69) (P=0.168). Intrahepatic recurrence rateof patients who had elevated CA19-9 (&gt; 200) (n=49) was higher than that of patients who had not (n=94) ( P=0.002). In multivariate analyses, preoperative ENBD and/or ERBD and elevated serum CA19-9 level (&gt;200 ng/mL) were prognostic factors for intrahepatic recurrence, with hazard ratios (HR) of 2.154 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.893-7.626, P = 0.080) and 3.647, (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.660-8.011, P = 0.001). Conclusions: Preoperative preoperative endoscopic nasal biliary drainage (ENBD) and/or endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) procedures may affect the intrahepatic recurrence of tumor in patient with cholangiocarcinoma after surgical resection. And serum elevated CA 19-9 level affected intrahepatic recurrence of tumor in patients with cholangiocarcinoma after surgical resection.

Dynamic three-dimensional liver volume assessment of liver regeneration in hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients undergoing hemi-hepatectomy.

For patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) undergoing hemi-hepatectomy, there are controversies regarding the requirement of, indications for, and timing of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD). Dynamic three-dimensional volume reconstruction could effectively evaluate the regeneration of liver after surgery, which may provide assistance for exploring indications for PBD and optimal preoperative bilirubin value. The purpose of this study was to explore the indications for PBD and the optimal preoperative bilirubin value to improve prognosis for HC patients undergoing hemi-hepatectomy. We retrospectively analyzed the data of HC patients who underwent hemi-hepatectomy in the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University from 2012 to 2023. The liver regeneration rate was calculated using three-dimensional volume reconstruction. We analyzed the factors affecting the liver regeneration rate and occurrence of postoperative liver insufficiency. This study involved 83 patients with HC, which were divided into PBD group (n=36) and non-PBD group (n=47). The preoperative bilirubin level may be an independent risk factor affecting the liver regeneration rate (P=0.014) and postoperative liver insufficiency (P=0.016, odds ratio=1.016, β=0.016, 95% CI=1.003-1.029). For patients whose initial bilirubin level was >200 μmol/L (n=45), PBD resulted in better liver regeneration in the early stage (P=0.006) and reduced the incidence of postoperative liver insufficiency [P=0.012, odds ratio=0.144, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.031-0.657]. The cut-off value of bilirubin was 103.15 μmol/L based on the liver regeneration rate. Patients with a preoperative bilirubin level of ≤103.15 μmol/L shown a better liver regeneration (P<0.01) and lower incidence of postoperative hepatic insufficiency (P=0.011, odds ratio=0.067, 95% CI=0.008-0.537). For HC patients undergoing hemi-hepatectomy whose initial bilirubin level is >200 μmol/L, PBD may result in better liver regeneration and reduce the incidence of postoperative liver insufficiency. Preoperative bilirubin levels ≤103.15 μmol/L maybe recommended for leading to a better liver regeneration and lower incidence of postoperative hepatic insufficiency.