Preimplantation Genetic Testing Research Articles

Screening embryos for polygenic disease risk: a review of epidemiological, clinical, and ethical considerations.

The genetic composition of embryos generated by in vitro fertilization (IVF) can be examined with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). Until recently, PGT was limited to detecting single-gene, high-risk pathogenic variants, large structural variants, and aneuploidy. Recent advances have made genome-wide genotyping of IVF embryos feasible and affordable, raising the possibility of screening embryos for their risk of polygenic diseases such as breast cancer, hypertension, diabetes, or schizophrenia. Despite a heated debate around this new technology, called polygenic embryo screening (PES; also PGT-P), it is already available to IVF patients in some countries. Several articles have studied epidemiological, clinical, and ethical perspectives on PES; however, a comprehensive, principled review of this emerging field is missing. This review has four main goals. First, given the interdisciplinary nature of PES studies, we aim to provide a self-contained educational background about PES to reproductive specialists interested in the subject. Second, we provide a comprehensive and critical review of arguments for and against the introduction of PES, crystallizing and prioritizing the key issues. We also cover the attitudes of IVF patients, clinicians, and the public towards PES. Third, we distinguish between possible future groups of PES patients, highlighting the benefits and harms pertaining to each group. Finally, our review, which is supported by ESHRE, is intended to aid healthcare professionals and policymakers in decision-making regarding whether to introduce PES in the clinic, and if so, how, and to whom. We searched for PubMed-indexed articles published between 1/1/2003 and 1/3/2024 using the terms 'polygenic embryo screening', 'polygenic preimplantation', and 'PGT-P'. We limited the review to primary research papers in English whose main focus was PES for medical conditions. We also included papers that did not appear in the search but were deemed relevant. The main theoretical benefit of PES is a reduction in lifetime polygenic disease risk for children born after screening. The magnitude of the risk reduction has been predicted based on statistical modelling, simulations, and sibling pair analyses. Results based on all methods suggest that under the best-case scenario, large relative risk reductions are possible for one or more diseases. However, as these models abstract several practical limitations, the realized benefits may be smaller, particularly due to a limited number of embryos and unclear future accuracy of the risk estimates. PES may negatively impact patients and their future children, as well as society. The main personal harms are an unindicated IVF treatment, a possible reduction in IVF success rates, and patient confusion, incomplete counselling, and choice overload. The main possible societal harms include discarded embryos, an increasing demand for 'designer babies', overemphasis of the genetic determinants of disease, unequal access, and lower utility in people of non-European ancestries. Benefits and harms will vary across the main potential patient groups, comprising patients already requiring IVF, fertile people with a history of a severe polygenic disease, and fertile healthy people. In the United States, the attitudes of IVF patients and the public towards PES seem positive, while healthcare professionals are cautious, sceptical about clinical utility, and concerned about patient counselling. The theoretical potential of PES to reduce risk across multiple polygenic diseases requires further research into its benefits and harms. Given the large number of practical limitations and possible harms, particularly unnecessary IVF treatments and discarded viable embryos, PES should be offered only within a research context before further clarity is achieved regarding its balance of benefits and harms. The gap in attitudes between healthcare professionals and the public needs to be narrowed by expanding public and patient education and providing resources for informative and unbiased genetic counselling.

Efficacy of endometrial receptivity testing for recurrent implantation failure in patients with euploid embryo transfers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundEmbryo implantation remains a critical barrier in assisted reproductive technologies. One of the main causes of unsuccessful embryo implantation is window of implantation (WOI) displacement, particularly in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Therefore, a reliable diagnostic tool for identifying the optimal WOI is essential. Previous data has suggested that a novel RNA-Seq-based endometrial receptivity testing (ERT) can diagnose WOI, guide personalized embryo transfer (pET), and improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with RIF compared to standard embryo transfer (sET). However, there is still a lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCT) with sufficient power to determine whether pET based on ERT can increase the rate of live births as the primary outcome.MethodsThis trial is a prospective, single-blind, parallel-group RCT (1:1 ratio of pET versus sET). Infertile women with RIF who intend to undergo frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with the availability of at least one euploid blastocyst for transfer will be enrolled and assigned into two parallel groups randomly. Participants in the intervention group will undergo ERT and then pET based on the results of ERT, while those in the control group will undergo sET. The primary outcome is live birth rate.DiscussionThe findings of this study will provide evidence for the effect of pET guided by ERT on pregnancy outcomes in patients with RIF.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100049041. Registered on 20 July 2021.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in patients of different age: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study aimed to summarize the current knowledge on the benefits of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and to discuss the role of PGT-A in patients of different ages undergoing assisted reproduction. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 checklist. Registration number: CRD42022354697. Studies were identified by searching the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Scopus, Embase, and ClinicalTrials databases. Seven meta-analyses were performed with additional stratification of age and prognosis of the women studied. Clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer in patients aged >35 years was higher in the PGT-A group (P=0.0002) than in controls. Live birth rate (LBR) per embryo transfer in women 35 years old or younger (P=0.002) was higher in the PGT-A group. The LBR per patient in women aged >35 years was higher in the PGT-A group (P=0.004). The effects of PGT-A on LBR in patients with poor prognosis showed a statistically significant increase (P=0.003). There was no significant difference in the rate between the two groups. PGT-A is effective and can be recommended for patients aged >35 years undergoing assisted reproduction to improve their reproductive outcomes. Moreover, our study showed the possible benefits of PGT-A in patients with a poor prognosis. Overall, our findings suggest that PGT-A is a valuable tool for improving the reproductive outcomes of assisted reproductive procedures in older women and those with a history of pregnancy complications.

Comprehensive preimplantation genetic testing for balanced insertional translocation carriers

BackgroundBalanced insertional translocations (BITs) can increase the risk of infertility, recurrent miscarriages or neonatal birth defects due to chromosomal imbalances in gametes. However, studies on preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for...

#2259 Preimplantation genetic testing in inherited kidney diseases

Abstract Background and Aims Identifying the underlying genetic cause in individuals with monogenic kidney disease allow counselling to provide prognosis and therapeutic options. In addition, discussions may extend to assessing the risk of having affected children and exploring family planning alternatives. Pre-conception counselling covers a wide range of considerations, including the expected pregnancy outcome for both mother and child, the risk of recurrence, invasive prenatal diagnosis, and the option of pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT). In this study we provide a clinical overview of PGT for monogenic kidney disease in our centre. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of individuals with monogenic kidney disease counselled on our fertility clinic for PGT, in the Fundació Puigvert—Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona-Spain from January 2016 to 2023. Results During the study period, 751 visits were made to the fertility clinic, of which 8.3% (63/751) had a monogenic inherited kidney disease (IKD). Regarding the baseline characteristics of individuals with monogenic conditions, most were females (70%; 44/63). The mean age of the women was 33 years, most had no history of pregnancy prior to the first visit (73%). The mean anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) level was 2.67 ng/ml, with 22% having levels below 1.1 ng/ml. Most cases (84%; 53/63) showed an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance, with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) being the primary cause in 66% of cases (42/63), followed by tuberous sclerosis complex in 8% (5/63). Autosomal recessive and X-linked disorders were each present in 8% (5/63). Table 1 shows the complete list of genetic kidney disease cases that consulted the fertility clinic. In terms of renal function, affected women had a mean renal function measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 90 mil/min/1.73 m2, with 74% having chronic kidney disease (CKD) category G1. Affected male had mean eGFR of 65 mL/min/1.73 m2, with only 38% (6/19 patients) having CKD-G1. Two (13%; 2/19) of the affected men had received a kidney transplant. Of the 63 couples who were counseled, 51% (32/63) agreed to proceed with PGT; 81% (26/32) underwent at least one cycle of ovarian stimulation, in vitro fertilization, and PGT. Fifty per cent (13/26) had a live birth child and 19% (5/26) are currently pregnant. Six couples (10%; 6/32) have pending tests. Among patients who decided not to proceed with PGT (31/63), the main reason for not doing so was that they had a spontaneous pregnancy before the first PGT cycle (35%; 11/31). Low ovarian reserve and couple´s refusal to proceed with PGT were the second most common reasons, each accounting for 22.5% of cases. In 10% (3/31) of cases, the indication for PGT was not yet approved in Spain (mainly because these patients already had a healthy living child). Maternal age over 40 years and the age of the prospective father were the reasons for not performing PGT in 6% and 3% respectively. Of note, a patient with ADPKD presented with a ruptured hepatic cyst after ovarian hormone stimulation. Therefore, PGT was discontinued after two cycles. Conclusion Women with IKD are most likely to request PGT than affected males. The most frequent condition is, by far, ADPKD. Once the technique is explained less than 50% of couples keep wishing to undergo PGT. Low ovarian reserve (which correlates quite well with age) is an important reason that impedes to go through PGT. Larger international studies are needed to understand the patient's uptake of PGT for IKD as well as the access to this technique depending on the country.

#2095 Genetic kidney disease in pregnancy – experience of tertiary referral hospital

Abstract Background and Aims Genetic kidney diseases (GKD) are rarely seen in pregnancy and some diagnosis will only be made during gestation, due to a high proportion of chronic kidney diseases (CKD) of unknown etiology and recent advances in genetic testing. Genetic counseling and, when possible, preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) should be offered pre-pregnancy to this specific CKD population. Method Retrospective analysis of maternal, obstetric and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with GKD surveilled at Hospital Santa Maria, at the nephro-obstetric clinic from 2011 to 2023. Results We evaluated 34 pregnancies in 28 women, mean maternal age 30±6 years-old [21-37], 89% Caucasian. Molecular genetic testing was performed pre-pregnancy, during and post-pregnancy in 12/19, 2/19 and 5/19 patients, respectively. At baseline, mean serum creatinine (SCr) and proteinuria (Pr) was 1.0±0.9 mg/dL and 222±516 mg/g, with CKD stage 1/2/3/4/5 in 27/2/2/1/2 gestations and chronic hypertension (HTN) in 11/34 pregnancies. Only 1/28 patients performed PGT, while 1/28 patient declined it. De novo or increased Pr occurred in 10/34 gestations and de novo or worsening HTN in 5/34 gestations. Deterioration of renal function occurred in one patient (CKD3) without recovery and one patient (CKD5) induced dialysis 4 months post-pregnancy. Nephrotic Pr developed in 4/34 gestations. One patient (FSGS APOL1) was treated with tacrolimus and low dose steroids. The patient with TSC re-started sirolimus on week 22 to treat severe fetal ventricular rhabdomyoma. Miscarriage occurred in 2 pregnancies. The C section rate was 21,8%. There were 7 preterm deliveries of which 3 before 32 weeks of pregnancy, mainly due to severe preeclampsia. Mean gestational age at delivery was 37,6 ± 4 weeks (26-41), mean birth weight 2756 ± 831 g (560-3835). Eight newborns were admitted to neonatal ICU due prematurity, fetal TSC, and feeding difficulties. Pulmonary hemorrhage and sepsis caused the death of 2 newborns. We found 1 maternal death, due to rupture of a cerebral aneurism 1 month postpartum (PKD patient). Conclusion Our cohort was very heterogenous regarding CKD etiologies, but generally with good kidney function, which allowed overall good obstetric outcomes. Still, maternal, obstetric and fetal complications, namely HTN, Pr, PE and prematurity had an increased incidence compared to pregnancy in healthy patients. This particular population should be approached by an experienced multidisciplinary team in CKD pregnancy care to optimize outcome.

Is biochemical pregnancy loss associated with embryo or endometrium? A retrospective cohort study in frozen single embryo transfer of own and donated oocytes.

Does the use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A), personalized embryo transfer with endometrial receptivity assay (pET-ERA), or the use of donated oocytes modify the incidence of biochemical pregnancy loss (BPL) in frozen single embryo transfer (FSET)? Following FSET, BPL incidence does not differ between own and donated oocytes, and the use of PGT-A with euploid embryo transfer or pET-ERA results in a similar incidence of BPL compared to cycles without embryo or endometrial analysis. BPL occurs frequently after IVF, and many factors have been associated with its incidence. The etiology of BPL is not well known, but the most probable cause seems to be either a low-quality embryo or impaired endometrial maintenance. The impact of techniques diagnosing embryonic ploidy or endometrial receptivity on BPL incidence and the BPL incidence between own and donated oocytes have not been analyzed. This is a retrospective cohort study analyzing the incidence of BPL over 3741 cycles of FSET derived from own (2399 cycles) and donated (1342 cycles) oocytes between January 2013 and January 2022 in 1736 of which PGT-A, pET-ERA, or both were applied. We defined BPL as a pregnancy diagnosed only by serum β-hCG > 10 UI/l followed by a decrease that does not result in a clinical pregnancy. Clinical pregnancy was defined as the presence of gestational sac on transvaginal ultrasound. We compared BPL rates among patients undergoing 2399 FSETs from own oocytes, which comprised 1310 cycles of embryos analyzed by PGT-A, 950 cycles of untested embryos, 30 cycles of untested embryos with pET-ERA, and a subgroup of 109 cycles analyzed by both PGT-A and pET-ERA. We also included a total of 1342 FSET cycles from donated oocytes comprising 132, 1055, 140, and 15 cycles in the same groups, respectively. In FSET from own oocytes, the overall BPL rate per embryo transfer was 8.2% (95% CI [7.09-9.33]). In untested embryo transfers, the BPL rate was 7.5% [5.91-9.37]. In the PGT-A group, the BPL rate was 8.8% [7.32-10.47]. In the pET-ERA group, the rate was 6.7% [0.82-22.07]. In the PGT-A+ERA group, the rate was 6.5% [2.65-12.90]. No significant differences were found (P = 0.626). A multivariate analysis considering clinically meaningful variables that were significantly different among groups, taking the untested embryos/endometrium group as a reference, showed comparable incidences among groups. For PGT-A, the adjusted odds ratio (AdjOR) was 1.154 [0.768-1.735] (P = 0.49) and for PGT-A+ERA 0.885 [0.330-2.375] (P = 0.808). Because of a low number of registered cases in the pET-ERA group, and to prevent statistical errors and convergence issues, this group was excluded from further analysis. In FSET of donated oocytes, the overall BPL rate per embryo transfer was 4.9% [3.76-6.14]. In the PGT-A group, the BPL rate was 6.8% [3.16-12.55]. In the pET-ERA group, the rate was 5.0% [2.03-10.03]. In untested embryo transfers, the rate was 4.7% [3.46-6.10]. No cases occurred in the PGT-A+ERA group, and no significant differences were found (P = 0.578). The multivariate analysis showed comparable incidences among groups. For PGT-A the AdjOR was 1.669 [0.702-3.972] (P = 0.247) and for pET-ERA 1.189 [0.433-3.265] (P = 0.737). The PGT-A+ERA group was eliminated from the model to prevent statistical errors and convergence issues because no BPL cases were registered in this group. In the multivariate analysis, when the sources of oocytes were compared, own versus donated, no significant differences were found in the incidence of BPL. This was a retrospective cohort study with potential biases. In addition, we were unable to control differences among groups due to modifications in medical or laboratory protocols during this long time period, which may modify the relationships being addressed. Factors previously associated with BPL, such as immunological conditions other than thyroid autoimmunity, were not considered in this study. Limited sample sizes of some groups may limit the statistical power for finding differences that can be present in the general population. BPL may be related to a mechanism not associated with the chromosomal constitution of the embryo or the transcriptome of the endometrium. More studies are needed to explore the factors associated with this reproductive issue. No specific funding was available for this study. None of the authors have a conflict of interest to declare with regard to this study. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04549909).

Enhancing clinical utility: deep learning-based embryo scoring model for non-invasive aneuploidy prediction

BackgroundThe best method for selecting embryos ploidy is preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). However, it takes more labour, money, and experience. As such, more approachable, non- invasive techniques were still needed. Analyses driven by artificial intelligence have been presented recently to automate and objectify picture assessments.MethodsIn present retrospective study, a total of 3448 biopsied blastocysts from 979 Time-lapse (TL)-PGT cycles were retrospectively analyzed. The “intelligent data analysis (iDA) Score” as a deep learning algorithm was used in TL incubators and assigned each blastocyst with a score between 1.0 and 9.9.ResultsSignificant differences were observed in iDAScore among blastocysts with different ploidy. Additionally, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that higher scores were significantly correlated with euploidy (p < 0.001). The Area Under the Curve (AUC) of iDAScore alone for predicting euploidy embryo is 0.612, but rose to 0.688 by adding clinical and embryonic characteristics.ConclusionsThis study provided additional information to strengthen the clinical applicability of iDAScore. This may provide a non-invasive and inexpensive alternative for patients who have no available blastocyst for biopsy or who are economically disadvantaged. However, the accuracy of embryo ploidy is still dependent on the results of next-generation sequencing technology (NGS) analysis.

Poor Response to Gonadotropin Stimulation and Perinatal Outcomes in Fresh In Vitro Fertilization Embryo Transfer Cycles-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective: The objective was to examine the association between poor ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations in young patients. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study including women aged 17-39 who underwent fresh embryo transfer and delivered a singleton neonate at a single center (pre-implantation genetic testing excluded) (2007-2022). Patients were classified as one of the following categories: poor responders-daily follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) ≥ 150 IU yielding ≤ 3 retrieved oocytes; normal responders-4-15 oocytes; and high responders with ≥16 oocytes. The primary outcome was a composite of pre-eclampsia (mild or severe), small-for-gestational-age, gestational diabetes mellitus, and preterm birth (<37 weeks). We compared maternal and neonatal outcomes between the three groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to control for confounders. Results: Overall, 507 women met the inclusion criteria. Of them, there were 44 (8.68%) poor responders, 342 (67.46%) normal responders, and 121 (23.87%) high responders. Poor responders, compared to normal and high responders, were characterized by a higher maternal age (34.64 ± 4.01 vs. 31.4 ± 5.04 vs. 30.01 ± 4.93, p < 0.001, respectively) and total FSH dosage (3028.41 ± 1792.05 IU vs. 2375.11 ± 1394.05 IU vs. 1869.31 ± 1089.63 IU, p < 0.001). The perinatal outcomes examined, including cesarean delivery (CD) rate and the composite outcome, were comparable between groups. Using multivariable logistic regression and adjusting for ovarian response group, maternal age, nulliparity, and estradiol level and endometrial thickness before ovulation triggering, poor response was not associated with CD rate or the composite outcome, with maternal age associated with CD (p = 0.005), and nulliparity with the composite outcome (p = 0.007). Similar results were obtained when comparing poor responders to each other group separately or to all other responders. Conclusions: Poor ovarian response is not associated with increased adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes.

The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a committee opinion.

The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in the United States has been increasing steadily. Moreover, the underlying technology used for 24-chromosome analysis continues to evolve rapidly. The value of PGT-A as a routine screening test for all patients undergoing invitro fertilization has not been demonstrated. Although some earlier single-center studies reported higher live-birth rates after PGT-A in favorable-prognosis patients, recent multicenter, randomized control trials in women with available blastocysts concluded that the overall pregnancy outcomes via frozen embryo transfer were similar between PGT-A and conventional invitro fertilization. The value of PGT-A to lower the risk of clinical miscarriage is also unclear, although these studies have important limitations. This document replaces the document of the same name, last published in2018.

A heatmap for expected cumulative live birth rate in preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders and chromosomal structural rearrangements.

Our objective is to predict the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) and identify the specific subset within the population undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) and chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) which is likely to exhibit a diminished expected CLBR based on various patient demographics. We performed a single-centre retrospective cohort study including 1522 women undergoing 3130 PGT cycles at a referral centre for PGT. A logistic regression analysis was performed to predict the CLBR per ovarian stimulation in women undergoing PGT-M by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, and in women undergoing PGT-SR by SNP array, array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) or next-generation sequencing (NGS). The mean age of women was 32.6years, with a mean AMH of 2.75µg/L. Female age and AMH significantly affected the expected CLBR irrespective of the inheritance mode or PGT technology. An expected CLBR < 10% was reached above the age of 42years and AMH ≤ 1.25µg/L. We found no significant difference in outcome per ovarian stimulation between the different PGT technologies, i.e. PCR, SNP array, array CGH and NGS. Whereas per embryo transfer, we noticed a significantly higher probability of live birth when SNP array, array CGH and NGS were used as compared to PCR. In a PGT-setting, couples with an unfavourable female age and AMH should be informed of the prognosis to allow other reproductive choices. The heatmap produced in this study can be used as a visual tool for PGT couples.

Regulatory safeguards needed if preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic risk scores (PGT-P) is permitted in Singapore

Singapore, a highly affluent island city-state located in Southeast Asia, has increasingly leveraged new assisted reproductive technologies (ART) to overcome its dismal fertility rates in recent years. A new frontier...

Comparing the advantages, disadvantages and diagnostic power of different non-invasive pre-implantation genetic testing: A literature review

To improve embryo transfer success and increase the chances of live birth in assisted reproductive methods, there is a growing demand for the use of pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT). However, the invasive approaches used in PGT have led to in vitro fertilization failure and abortions, increasing anxiety levels for parents. To address this, non-invasive PGT methods have been introduced, such as the detection of DNA in blastocoel fluid of blastocysts and spent culture media (SCM). These methods have proven to be minimally invasive and effective in detecting aneuploidy in the chromosomes of human embryos. This review aims to explore the different approaches to pre-implantation diagnosis, including invasive and non-invasive methods, with a particular focus on non-invasive PGT (niPGT). The search strategy involved gathering data from scientific databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct using relevant keywords. The search was conducted until January 2023. In total, 22 studies have successfully reported the detection and amplification of cell-free DNA in the embryonic SCM. It is important to note that niPGT has some limitations, which include differences in indicators such as cell-free DNA amplification rate, concordance, level of maternal DNA contamination, sensitivity, and specificity between SCM samples and biopsied cells. Therefore, more extensive and detailed research is needed to fully understand niPGT’s potential for clinical applications. Key words: Spent culture media, Non-invasive pre-implantation genetic testing, Biopsy methods, Cell-free embryonic DNA.

Association between the length of in vitro embryo culture, mode of ART, and the initial endogenous hCG rise in ongoing singleton pregnancies.

Is there an association between the length of in vitro culture, mode of ART and the initial endogenous hCG rise, in cycles with a foetal heartbeat after single embryo transfer (ET) and implantation? Both the length of in vitro culture and the mode of ART have an impact on the initial endogenous rise in hCG in singleton pregnancies. Different factors have been identified to alter the kinetics of hCG in pregnancies. Current studies show conflicting results regarding the kinetics of hCG after different types of ART (fresh vs frozen ET (FET)), the inclusion or not of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), and the length of time in in vitro culture. This was a multicentre cohort study, using prospectively collected data derived from 4938 women (5524 treatment cycles) undergoing IUI (cycles, n = 608) or ART (cycles, n = 4916) treatments, resulting a in singleton ongoing pregnancy verified by first-trimester ultrasound scan. Data were collected from the Danish Medical Data Centre, used by the three participating Danish public fertility clinics at Copenhagen University hospitals: Herlev Hospital, Hvidovre Hospital, and Rigshospitalet, from January 2014 to December 2021. The fresh ET cycles included cleavage-stage (2 or 3 days in vitro) and blastocyst (5 days in vitro) transfers. FET cycles included cleavage-stage (3 days in vitro before cryopreservation) or blastocyst (5 or 6 days in vitro before cryopreservation) transfers. The IUI cycles represented no time in vitro. To attain a comparable interval for serum-hCG (s-hCG), the ovulation induction time was identical: 35-37 h before oocyte retrieval or IUI. The conception day was considered as: the insemination day for pregnancies conceived after IUI, the oocyte retrieval day for fresh ET, or the transfer day minus 3 or 5 as appropriate for FET of Day 3 or 5 embryos. Multiple linear regression analysis was used, including days post-conception for the hCG measurement as a covariate, and was adjusted for the women's age, the cause of infertility, and the centre. For FET, a sensitivity analysis was used to adjust for endometrial preparation. The study totally includes 5524 cycles: 2395 FET cycles, 2521 fresh ET cycles, and 608 IUI cycles. Regarding the length of in vitro culture, with IUI as reference (for no time in in vitro culture), we found a significantly lower s-hCG in pregnancies achieved after fresh ET (cleavage-stage ET or blastocyst transfer). S-hCG was 18% (95% CI: 13-23%, P < 0.001) lower after fresh cleavage-stage ET, and 23% (95% CI: 18-28%, P < 0.001) lower after fresh blastocyst transfer compared to IUI. In FET cycles, s-hCG was significantly higher after blastocyst transfers compared to cleavage-stage FET, respectively, 26% (95% CI: 13-40%, P < 0.001) higher when cryopreserved on in vitro Day 5, and 14% (95% CI: 2-26%, P = 0.02) higher when cryopreserved on in vitro Day 6 as compared to Day 3. Regarding the ART treatment type, s-hCG after FET blastocyst transfer (Day 5 blastocysts) cycles was significantly higher, 33% (95% CI: 27-45%, P < 0.001), compared to fresh ET (Day 5 blastocyst), while there was no difference between cleavage-stage FET (Days 2 + 3) and fresh ET (Days 2 + 3). S-hCG was 12% (95% CI: 4-19%, 0.005) lower in PGT FET (Day 5 blastocysts) cycles as compared to FET cycles without PGT (Day 5 blastocysts). The retrospective design is a limitation which introduces the risk of possible bias and confounders such as embryo score, parity, and ovarian stimulation. This study elucidates how practices in medically assisted reproduction treatment are associated with the hCG kinetics, underlining a potential impact of in vitro culture length and mode of ART on the very early embryo development and implantation. The study provides clinicians knowledge that the type of ART used may be relevant to take into account when evaluating s-hCG for the prognosis of the pregnancy. No funding was received for this study. AP has received consulting fees, research grants, or honoraria from the following companies: Preglem, Novo Nordisk, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gedeon Richter, Cryos, Merck A/S, and Organon. AZ has received grants and honoraria from Gedeon Richter. NLF has received grants from Gedeon Richter, Merck A/S, and Cryos. MLG has received honoraria fees or research grants from Gedeon Richter, Merck A/S, and Cooper Surgical. CB has received honoraria from Merck A/S. MB has received research grants and honoraria from IBSA. MPR, KM, and PVS all report no conflicts of interest. The study was registered and approved by the Danish Protection Agency, Capital Region, Denmark (Journal-nr.: 21019857). No approval was required from the regional ethics committee according to Danish law.

Genetic analysis and assisted reproductive guidance for two infertile patients with rare small supernumerary marker chromosomes

To carry out cytogenetic and molecular genetic analysis for two infertile patients carrying rare small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC). Two infertile patients who received reproductive and genetic counseling at CITIC Xiangya Reproductive and Genetic Hospital on October 31, 2018 and May 10, 2021, respectively were selected as the study subjects. The origin of sSMCs was determined by conventional G banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq). Microdissection combined with high-throughput whole genome sequencing (MicroSeq) was carried out to determine the fragment size and genomic information of their sSMCs. For patient 1, G-banded karyotyping and FISH revealed that he has a karyotype of mos47,XY,del(16)(p10p12),+mar[65]/46,XY,del(16)(p10p12)[6]/48,XY,del(16)(p10p12),+2mar[3].ish mar(Tel 16p-,Tel 16q-,CEP 16-,WCP 16+). CNV analysis has yielded a result of arr[GRCh37]16p12.1p11.2(24999364_33597595)×1[0.25]. MicroSeq revealed that his sSMC has contained the region of chromosome 16 between 24979733 and 34023115 (GRCh37). For patient 2, karyotyping and reverse FISH revealed that she has a karyotype of mos 47,XX,+mar[37]/46,XX[23].rev ish CEN5, and CNV analysis has yielded a result of seq[GRCh37]dup(5)(p12q11.2)chr5:g(45120001_56000000)dup[0.8]. MicroSeq results revealed that her sSMC has contained the region of chromosome 5 between 45132364 and 55967870(GRCh37). After genetic counseling, both couples had opted in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). For individuals harboring sSMCs, it is vital to delineate the origin and structural characteristics of the sSMCs for their genetic counseling and reproductive guidance. Preimplantation genetic testing after microdissection combined with high-throughput whole genome sequencing (MicroSeq-PGT) can provide an alternative treatment for carrier couples with a high genetic risk.

Preimplantation genetic testing for a Chinese pedigree affected with Rett syndrome

To carry out preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for a Chinese pedigree affected with Rett syndrome (RTT). A pedigree affected with RTT who had presented at the First Hospital of Jilin University on June 4, 2021 was selected as the study subject. Variant of the MECP2 gene was analyzed by next generation sequencing (NGS) and Sanger sequencing. Direct sequencing was also used to determine the carrier status for the c.925C>T variant of the MECP2 gene in the blastocysts, and Sanger sequencing was used to validate the results. The MECP2 gene and 168 effective single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci within 2 Mb ranges up- and downstream of the gene were used to construct a haplotype for analyzing the variant site in the embryos, and embryos without the variant were subjected to the analysis for chromosomal aneuploidies. PGT analysis revealed that five out of seven blastocysts did not harbor the pathogenic variant. The results of aneuploidy analysis indicated that two out of five blastocysts without the variant were euploid. Following genetic counselling, the couple had opted to transplant the optimal blastocyst. Following clinical pregnancy, prenatal diagnosis showed that the fetus has a normal chromosomal karyotype, and the c.925C>T variant was not detected in the amniotic fluid sample. A healthy girl was born by Cesarean section at full term. NGS can attain efficient PGT detection and reduce the risk of disease recurrence in families affected with RTT.

Is a day 7 blastocyst predictive of the reproductive potential of sibling day 5 and day 6 blastocysts?

To explore if a day 7 blastocyst is predictive of the reproductive potential of sibling day 5 or day 6 blastocysts? Retrospective cohort of autologous frozen embryo transfers (FET), February 2019 to April 2022. Cycles divided into groups 1 to 5, according to the day of embryo cryopreservation and the presence of a day 7 blastocyst sibling within the cohort: group 1/group 2-day 5 blastocyst without/with a day 7 sibling, group 3/group 4-day 6 blastocyst without/with a day 7 sibling, group 5-day 7 blastocyst. Clinical, ongoing pregnancy and miscarriage rates, cycle, and patient characteristics are reported. Multivariable generalized estimating equations (GEE) logistic regression analysis accounts for confounders and assesses the effect of a sibling day 7 blastocyst on ongoing pregnancy rates of day 5 or day 6 blastocyst FETs. Ongoing pregnancy rates are 38.4%, 59.5%, 30.8%, 32.7%, and 4.4% in groups 1-5, respectively. When correcting for maternal age, number of oocytes retrieved and discarded per cohort, and ploidy, embryos cryopreserved on either day 6 or day 7 have reduced odds of ongoing pregnancy after FET compared to day 5 blastocysts (OR = 0.76, IQR [0.61-0.95], p-value = 0.01). However, the presence of a day 7 sibling does not significantly affect odds of ongoing pregnancy of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts compared to the same-day blastocyst without a day 7 sibling (p-value = 0.20 and 0.46, respectively). This finding is consistent within both the Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) unscreened and screened (euploid) embryo subgroups. Day of embryo cryopreservation significantly affects ongoing pregnancy rates. However, day 7 embryos within a cohort do not affect the reproductive potential of sibling day 5 and day 6 blastocysts, suggesting that slow embryo development is an embryo-specific trait.

Effect of intraovarian platelet-rich plasma injection on IVF outcomes in women with poor ovarian response: the PROVA randomized controlled trial.

Does intraovarian platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection increase the number of mature oocytes obtained after controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in young women with poor ovarian response (POR) undergoing IVF? Intraovarian PRP injection procedure does not improve mature oocyte yield after COS in women less than 38 years old with an established IVF history of POR. POR is frequently encountered among the infertile population and the number of women seeking infertility treatment related to POR is increasing. Effective treatment options for this patient population to conceive with autologous oocytes are lacking. Case series and cohort studies suggest that intraovarian PRP injection may improve follicular recruitment in women with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and POR, yet robust randomized studies have not been performed to date to determine the clinical utility of this intervention. This was a multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted at university-affiliated reproductive centers in the USA and Turkey, between January 2020 and November 2022. Patients who met inclusion criteria (<38 years old, two or more prior cycles with <3 oocytes retrieved; and without single gene disorders, prior ovarian surgery, endometriomas, BMI >35 kg/m2, or severe male factor infertility) were randomized to either the PRP or control group. Patients in both groups subsequently underwent COS, oocyte retrieval, ICSI, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), and single euploid embryo transfer. Number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes obtained was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included ovarian reserve tests (antral follicle count [AFC] and anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH]), blastocyst and euploid blastocyst yields, and sustained implantation. The study was powered to detect a difference of one mature oocyte obtained at oocyte retrieval. In total, 83 patients met inclusion criteria and were randomized to receive autologous intraovarian PRP injection (n = 41) or to no intervention (n = 42). No significant differences were observed in number of MII oocytes retrieved per cycle (2.8 ± 2.4 vs 3.1 ± 3.3 in PRP vs control, respectively; P = 0.9), blastocysts (1.0 ± 1.3 vs 1.3 ± 2.1, P = 0.8), or euploid blastocysts (0.8 ± 1.1 vs 0.9 ± 1.6; P = 0.5). Similarly, no differences were observed in the likelihood of obtaining at least one euploid blastocyst (45% vs 37%, P = 0.4; relative risk [RR], 95% CI = 0.9, 0.6-1.2) or the rate of sustained implantation (31% vs 29%, P = 0.9; RR 1.0, 0.7-1.3). Posttreatment AFC (7.9 ± 4.5 vs 6.8 ± 4.8, P = 0.3) and AMH (0.99 ± 0.98 vs 0.7 ± 0.6, P = 0.2) were also not different between the groups. Results from this RCT may not be generalizable to other PRP preparations owing to heterogeneity and lack of standardization. The control groups did not undergo a sham ovarian injection, which would have been relevant had the results shown benefit of PRP injection. Only patients with POR were included in this study, and these results may not be generalizable to more severe diminution of ovarian reserve, as seen with POI. The intraovarian PRP injection procedure does not improve mature oocyte yield or other parameters of IVF outcome in women less than 38 years old with an established IVF history of POR. The results from this study do not support the use of intraovarian PRP injection in this population. Departmental funds were used and no external funding was requested for this study. ES is a consultant for and receives grant funding from the Foundation for Embryonic Competence. All other authors have no conflict of interest to declare. Clinicaltrials.gov Registry Identifier: NCT04163640. 15 November 2019. 24 February 2020.

Advanced Paternal Age in Focus: Unraveling Its Influence on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes.

As global demographics shift toward increasing paternal age, the realm of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), particularly in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), faces new challenges and opportunities. This study provides a comprehensive exploration of the implications of advanced paternal age on ART outcomes. Background research highlights the social, cultural, and economic factors driving men toward later fatherhood, with a focus on the impact of delayed paternity on reproductive outcomes. Methods involve a thorough review of existing literature, centering on changes in testicular function, semen quality, and genetic and epigenetic shifts associated with advancing age. Study results point to intricate associations between the father's age and ART outcomes, with older age being linked to diminished semen quality, potential genetic risks, and varied impacts on embryo quality, implantation rates, and birth outcomes. The conclusions drawn from the current study suggest that while advanced paternal age presents certain risks and challenges, understanding and mitigating these through strategies such as sperm cryopreservation, lifestyle modifications, and preimplantation genetic testing can optimize ART outcomes. Future research directions are identified to further comprehend the epigenetic mechanisms and long-term effects of the older father on offspring health. This study underscores the need for a comprehensive approach in navigating the intricacies of delayed fatherhood within the context of ART, aiming for the best possible outcomes for couples and their children.

The comparision among euploidy of preimplantation blastocysts in different controlled ovary stimulation (COH) protocols.

To compare differences in euploidy rates for blastocysts in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long and short protocols, GnRH-antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol, progestin-primed ovarian stimulation and mild stimulation protocols, and other ovary stimulation protocols. This was a retrospective cohort study from the Assisted Reproductive Medicine Department of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. A total of 1657 PGT-A cycles with intracytoplasmic sperm injection after different controlled ovary hyperstimulation protocols were analyzed, and a total of 3154 embryos were biopsied. Differences in euploidy rate per embryo biopsied, embryo euploidy rate per oocyte retrieved and cycle cancellation rate were compared. For the PGT-A cycles, the euploidy rate per embryo biopsied was lower in the GnRH-ant protocol than in the GnRH-a long protocol (53.26 vs. 58.68%, respectively). Multiple linear regression showed that the GnRH-ant protocol was associated with a lower euploidy rate per embryo biopsied (β = -0.079, p = 0.011). The euploidy rate per embryo biopsied was not affected by total gonadotropin dosage, duration of stimulation and number of oocytes retrieved. The embryo euploidy rate per oocyte retrieved was similar in all protocols and was negatively correlated with the total number of oocytes retrieved (β = -0.003, p = 0.003). Compared with the GnRH-a long protocol, the GnRH-ant protocol was associated with a lower euploidy rate per embryo biopsied. The total gonadotropin dosage, duration of stimulation and number of oocytes retrieved did not appear to significantly influence euploidy rates.