Prehospital Patient Care Research Articles

Mobile stroke units based on rural emergency medical stations for pre-hospital intravenous thrombolysis of stroke in remote areas

ABSTRACT Objectives To explore a novel model of mobile stroke units (MSUs) integrated with rural emergency medical stations for pre-hospital care of stroke patients in remote areas. Methods We used MSUs + Ambulance mode, where both the MSUs and conventional ambulances are sent to the patient’s location. The conventional ambulance coordinates with the MSUs to choose the fastest route to meet and transfer the patient at the point along the way. We collected data from 149 patients from March 2022 to April 2023, including National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (on admission, 24 hours, day 7), 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, and other clinical variables. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) to balance the potential confounding variables between groups. Results We found that the MSUs + Ambulance mode (OR = 12.507, 95% confidence interval [CI] [3.633, 43.061], p < 0.001) and admission NIHSS score (OR = 0.583, 95% CI [0.493, 0.690], p < 0.001) were independent prognostic risk factors for stroke patients. The MSUs + Ambulance mode reduced NIHSS scores 7 days prior to admission (OR = 0.679, 95% CI [0.563, 0.819], p < 0.001). After PSM, patients who received MSUs + Ambulance mode had a better prognosis (χ2 = 9.573, p = 0.004), as well as a lower mRS score at 90 days (Z = -3.371, p = 0.001). Conclusions MSUs integrated with rural emergency medical stations show the feasibility and potential benefits of pre-hospital intravenous thrombolysis for stroke patients in geographically distant regions.

Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 Combined with Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Predicting Elevated Intracranial Pressure of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury in Prehospital Setting.

To investigate a correlation between the central venous minus arterial CO2 pressure to arterial minus central venous O2 content ratio (Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2) combined with optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in predicting prehospital elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. This was a prospective observational study of all adult TBI patients from the surgical intensive care unit who underwent invasive ICP monitoring between January 2023 and December 2023. Using a Delica MVU-6300 machine with 14-5 MHz linear probe to measure ONSD. We drew blood samples for arterial and central venous blood gases to measure and calculate the following indicators such as Pcv-aCO2, Ca-cvO2, and Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 ratio. ONSD and Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 were recorded during the first 3 days after admission. Simultaneous ICP values were gained from the invasive monitoring. Associations between ONSD, Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 and simultaneous ICP were explored by Spearman correlation analysis. We constructed an ROC curve to identify the ONSD and Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 cutoff for the evaluation of elevated ICP. We included 54 patients aged mean 57.13 (standard deviation 4.02) years and 24 (44%) were male. A significant correlation was observed between ONSD and ICP (r = 0.74, P < 0.01). The AUC was 0.861 (95% CI: 0.727-0.951), with a best cutoff value of 5.62 mm. Using a cutoff of 5.62mm, ONSD had a sensitivity of 92.8%, specificity of 80.4%. The Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 ratio also significantly correlated with ICP (r = 0.70, P < 0.01). The AUC was 0.791 (95% CI: 0.673-0.889). The optimal Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 value for predicting elevated ICP was 1.98mmHg/mL. Using a cutoff of 1.98mmHg/mL, Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 had a sensitivity of 87.3%, specificity of 77.2%. The AUC for ONSD combined with Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 was 0.952 (95% CI: 0.869-0.971), which had a sensitivity of 95.1%, specificity of 93.9%. Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 combined with ONSD performed best in predicting elevated intracranial pressure of patients with TBI in a prehospital setting. Our findings provide a crucial tool to improve earlier management of these patients in prehospital care, where the availability and utilization of invasive monitoring is limited. It could lead to significant changes in how TBI patients are monitored and treated before reaching a hospital.

Use of Long Spinal Board Post-Application of Protocol for Spinal Motion Restriction for Spinal Cord Injury.

Historically, prehospital care of trauma patients has included nearly universal use of a cervical collar (C-collar) and long spine board (LSB). Due to recent evidence demonstrating harm in using LSBs, implementation of new spinal motion restriction (SMR) protocols in the prehospital setting should reduce LSB use, even among patients with spinal cord injury. Our goal in this study was to evaluate the rates of and reasons for LSB use in high-risk patients-those with hospital-diagnosed spinal cord injury (SCI)-after statewide implementation of SMR protocols. Applying data from a state emergency medical services (EMS) registry to a state hospital discharge database, we identified cases in which a participating EMS agency provided care for a patient later diagnosed in the hospital with a SCI. Cases were then retrospectively reviewed to determine the prevalence of both LSB and C-collar use before and after agency adoption of a SMR protocol. We reviewed cases with LSB use after SMR protocol implementation to determine the motivations driving continued LSB use. We used simple descriptive statistics, odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to describe the results. We identified 52 EMS agencies in the state of Arizona with 417,979 encounters. There were 225 patients with SCI, of whom 74 were excluded. The LSBs were used in 52 pre-SMR (81%) and 49 post-SMR (56%) cases. The odds of LSB use after SMR protocol implementation was 70% lower than it had been before implementation (OR 0.297, 95% CI 0.139-0.643; P = 0.002). Use of a C-collar after SMR implementation was not significantly changed (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.23-1.143; P = 0.10). In the 49 cases of LSB use after agency SMR implementation, the most common reasons for LSB placement were ease of lifting (63%), placement by non-transporting agency (18%), and extrication (16.3%). High suspicion of SCI was determined as the primary or secondary reason for not removing LSB after assessment in 63% of those with LSB placement, followed by multiple transfers required (20%), and critical illness (10%). Implementation of selective spinal motion restriction protocols was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the utilization of long spine boards among prehospital patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury.

Change from semi-rigid to soft collars for prehospital management of trauma patients: An observational study.

Protection of the cervical spine is recommended following multisystem injury. In 2021, Ambulance Victoria changed clinical practice guidelines to apply soft collars instead of semi-rigid collars for suspected cervical spine injury. The aim of this study was to describe associated changes in imaging practices and diagnoses of pressure sores, hospital acquired pneumonia, and spinal cord injury. A retrospective pre- and postintervention study was conducted including all consecutive patients that presented to an adult major trauma center in Melbourne, Australia with a cervical collar placed by emergency medical services over two 3-month periods. There were 1762 patients included. A computed tomography (CT) of the cervical spine was performed in 795 (88.4%) patients in the semi-rigid collar period and 810 (93.8%) in the soft collar period (p=0.001). Soft collars were associated with higher rates of clearance of the cervical spine in the emergency department (ED) (odds ratio [OR] 4.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.36-5.09). There were no differences in diagnosis of pressure sores (0.11%vs. 0.23%, p=0.97) or hospital acquired pneumonia (2.0%vs. 2.7%; p=0.44) or cervical spinal cord injury (0.45%vs. 0.81%; p=0.50). Following a change from prehospital semi-rigid collars to soft collars, more patients were investigated with a CT scan and more frequent clearance of the cervical spine occurred in the ED. There were no differences in the rates of spinal cord injuries, pressure sores or hospital acquired pneumonia, but the study was underpowered to detect significant differences. The practice of soft collars for prehospital care of patients with suspected neck injury requires ongoing surveillance.

Tannic acid coating gauze immobilized with thrombin with ultra-high coagulation activity and antimicrobial property for uncontrollable hemorrhage

Rapid and safe hemostasis is crucial for the survival of bleeding patients in prehospital care. It is urgent to develop high performance hemostatic material to control the massive hemorrhage in the military field and accidental trauma. In this work, an efficient protein hemostat of thrombin was immobilized onto commercial gauze, which was mediated by self-polymerization and anchoring of tannic acid (TA). Through TA treatment, the efficient immobilization of thrombin was achieved, preserving both the biological activity of thrombin and the physical properties of the dressing, including absorbency, breathability, and mechanical performance. Moreover, in the presence of TA coating and thrombin, Gau@TA/Thr could obviously shortened clotting time and enriched blood components such as plasma proteins, platelets, and red blood cells, thereby exhibiting an enhanced in vitro coagulation effect. In SD rat liver volume defect and artery transection hemorrhage models, Gau@TA/Thr still had outstanding hemostatic performance. Besides, the Gau@TA/Thr gauze had inherent antibacterial property and demonstrated excellent biocompatibility. All results suggested that Gau@TA/Thr would be a potential candidate for treating uncontrollable hemorrhage in prehospital care.

Prehospital Care Times and Interventions for Victims of Major Trauma in the Central Region of Portugal: A Retrospective Study

The quality and promptness of prehospital care for major trauma patients are vital in order to lower their high mortality rate. However, the effectiveness of this response in Portugal is unknown. The objective of this study was to analyze response times and interventions for major trauma patients in the central region of Portugal. This was a retrospective, descriptive study, using the 2022 clinical records of the National Institute of Medical Emergency's differentiated resources. Cases of death prior to arrival at the hospital and other non-transport situations were excluded. Five-time intervals were determined, among which are the response time (T1, between activation and arrival at the scene), on-scene time (T2), and transportation time (T5; between the decision to transport and arrival at the emergency service). For each ambulance type, averages and dispersion times were calculated, as well as the proportion of cases in which the nationally and internationally recommended times were met. The frequency of recording six key interventions was also assessed. Of the 3366 records, 602 were eliminated (384 due to death), resulting in 2764 cases: nurse-technician ambulance (SIV) = 36.0%, physician- nurse ambulance (VMER) = 62.2% and physician-nurse helicopter = 1.8%. In a very large number of records, it was not possible to determine prehospital care times: for example, transport time (T5) could be determined in only 29%, 13% and 8% of cases, respectively for SIV, VMER and helicopter. The recommended time for stabilization (T2 ≤ 20 min) was met in 19.8% (SIV), 36.5% (VMER) and 18.2% (helicopter). Time to hospital (T5 ≤ 45 min) was achieved in 80.0% (SIV), 93.1% (VMER) and 75.0% (helicopter) of the records. The administration of analgesia (42% in SIV) and measures to prevent hypothermia (23.5% in SIV) were the most recorded interventions. There was substantial missing data on statuses and a lack of information in the records, especially in the VMER and helicopter. According to the records, the time taken to stabilize the victim on-scene often exceeded the recommendations, while the time taken to transport them to the hospital tended to be within the recommendations.

Pre-hospital care, pre-hospital delay, and in-hospital delay in patients with traumatic brain injury in getting neurosurgical care in a tertiary care center: A Cross-Sectional study.

Timely institution of pre-hospital therapies aimed at damage control and the appropriately timed decision of transfer to higher centers for definitive neurosurgical management are crucial in determining the outcome of patients following traumatic brain injury. This study aimed to evaluate the factors determining pre-hospital care and delay in patients with traumatic brain injury. This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary care center after obtaining ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board (approval number 392 (6-11) E2). All patients with traumatic brain injury who presented to the emergency department from 1 July, 2018 to 15 June, 2019 were enrolled. Data related to patient demographics, the primary cause of the incident, grading of traumatic brain injury on admission, pre-hospital care, and variables that cause pre-hospital delay were collected. In this study of 144 patients with traumatic brain injury, we found that 70 (48.61%) experienced transfer delays exceeding one hour. There were 71 (49.31%) patients aged 15-44 years, and 100 (69.44%) were males , with falls being the primary cause of 119 (82.64%). Most patients had mild traumatic brain injury 80 (55.56%). Out of 144, 20 (13.89%) received prehospital care, and 28 (19.44%) underwent a computed tomography scan of the head before arrival. Our study highlights the challenges in pre-hospital care and delays in reaching for neurosurgical care in patients with traumatic brain injury. Falls, road accidents, and physical assaults were the leading causes.

A Quality Improvement Initiative to Increase Confirmation of Prehospital Endotracheal Tube Placement at Emergency Department Transfer of Care

Objectives Rates of prehospital unplanned extubation (UE) range from 0 to 25% and are the result of many factors, including patient movement. Transfer of care of intubated patients to the emergency department (ED) involves significant patient movement and represents a high-risk event for UE. Frequent confirmation of endotracheal tube (ETT) placement is imperative for early recognition of UE and to minimize patient harm. Methods Local Practice—Our baseline rate of verbal ETT position confirmation with a member of the ED team during ED transfer of care was 74%. Our goal was to increase this practice to >90% in six months. This project was completed in partnership with Toronto Paramedic Services. Prehospital electronic patient care records (ePCRs) were reviewed weekly to determine the proportion of intubated patients who had ETT placement confirmed in the ED at transfer of care. Interventions—Pre- and post-project paramedic focus groups were conducted to identify potential drivers, change ideas, and project feedback. Three staggered interventions were introduced over five months: (1) memorandums to paramedics, ED chiefs and respiratory therapy leads, (2) individualized paramedic feedback e-mails, and (3) ePCR changes and closing rules. Results The pre-project focus group identified several potential drivers, such as physical barriers, interprofessional relationships, and communication. ETT confirmation remained ≥90% for the last eight weeks and interventions resulted in special cause variation. Median cases without verbal confirmation between paramedics and ED staff reduced from 5/week (IQR 2.5, 6.5) to 1/week (IQR 0, 2). UE was identified in 0.6% (2/340) of patients with ETT confirmation. The post-project focus group noted improvements in perceived accountability, interprofessional relationships, and satisfaction with interventions. Conclusion Through a series of interventions, we improved the rate of ETT confirmation during ED transfer of care. Although rates of UE were low, improvement in ETT confirmation may lead to faster recognition of UE when it does occur thereby mitigating complications. The observed improvement was sustained after interventions ended.

Regional Anaesthesia in the Prehospital Setting

Pain is often the main symptom in trauma patients. Although peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) provide fast, safe, and adequate analgesia, they are currently only rarely used outside the perioperative setting. In Germany, intravenous analgesia with non-opioid analgesics (NOPA) and strong opioids is the main treatment concept for prehospital pain. However, the use of highly potent opioids can be associated with significant side effects, especially in emergency patients. Therefore, PNBs are used in many hospitals for the treatment of perioperative pain. As with perioperative use, the advantages of early PNB in the prehospital analgesic treatment of trauma patients are obvious, especially for elderly and multimorbid patients. Early prehospital PNB can also facilitate the reduction of dislocated fractures or dislocated joints as well as the technical rescue of trauma patients. Common geriatric fractures, such as proximal femur or humerus fractures, can be treated appropriately and adequately with PNB.In this article, we show which PNB procedures can be useful in prehospital patient care and which requirements should be met for their safe use. We also present a concept for assessing whether and to what extent the prehospital use of PNB is indicated and appropriate. The aim of this article is to draw attention to PNB as a possible part of prehospital care concepts for trauma patients and to discuss its prehospital use.

Cervical spine immobilisation following blunt trauma in pre-hospital and emergency care: A systematic review.

To assess whether different cervical spine immobilisation strategies (full immobilisation, movement minimisation or no immobilisation), impact neurological and/or other outcomes for patients with suspected cervical spinal injury in the pre-hospital and emergency department setting. Systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and two research registers were searched until September 2023. All comparative studies (prospective or retrospective) that examined the potential benefits and/or harms of immobilisation practices during pre-hospital and emergency care of patients with a potential cervical spine injury (pre-imaging) following blunt trauma. Two authors independently selected and extracted data. Risk of bias was appraised using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool for non-randomised studies. Data were synthesised without meta-analysis. Six observational studies met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality was variable, with most studies having serious or critical risk of bias. The effect of cervical spine immobilisation practices such as full immobilisation or movement minimisation during pre-hospital and emergency care did not show clear evidence of benefit for the prevention of neurological deterioration, spinal injuries and death compared with no immobilisation. However, increased pain, discomfort and anatomical complications were associated with collar application during immobilisation. Despite the limited evidence, weak designs and limited generalisability, the available data suggest that pre-hospital cervical spine immobilisation (full immobilisation or movement minimisation) was of uncertain value due to the lack of demonstrable benefit and may lead to potential complications and adverse outcomes. High-quality randomised comparative studies are required to address this important question. PROSPERO REGISTRATION Fiona Lecky, Abdullah Pandor, Munira Essat, Anthea Sutton, Carl Marincowitz, Gordon Fuller, Stuart Reid, Jason Smith. A systematic review of cervical spine immobilisation following blunt trauma in pre-hospital and emergency care. PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022349600 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022349600.

Effect of a vapor barrier in combination with active external rewarming for cold-stressed patients in a prehospital setting: a randomized, crossover field study

BackgroundUse of a vapor barrier in the prehospital care of cold-stressed or hypothermic patients aims to reduce evaporative heat loss and accelerate rewarming. The application of a vapor barrier is recommended in various guidelines, along with both insulating and wind/waterproof layers and an active external rewarming device; however, evidence of its effect is limited. This study aimed to investigate the effect of using a vapor barrier as the inner layer in the recommended “burrito” model for wrapping hypothermic patients in the field.MethodsIn this, randomized, crossover field study, 16 healthy volunteers wearing wet clothing were subjected to a 30-minute cooling period in a snow chamber before being wrapped in a model including an active heating source either with (intervention) or without (control) a vapor barrier. The mean skin temperature, core temperature, and humidity in the model were measured, and the shivering intensity and thermal comfort were assessed using a subjective questionnaire. The mean skin temperature was the primary outcome, whereas humidity and thermal comfort were the secondary outcomes. Primary outcome data were analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).ResultsWe found a higher mean skin temperature in the intervention group than in the control group after approximately 25 min (p < 0.05), and this difference persisted for the rest of the 60-minute study period. The largest difference in mean skin temperature was 0.93 °C after 60 min. Humidity levels outside the vapor barrier were significantly higher in the control group than in the intervention group after 5 min. There were no significant differences in subjective comfort. However, there was a consistent trend toward increased comfort in the intervention group compared with the control group.ConclusionsThe use of a vapor barrier as the innermost layer in combination with an active external heat source leads to higher mean skin rewarming rates in patients wearing wet clothing who are at risk of accidental hypothermia.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05779722.

The value of pre-hospital trauma life support courses for medical personnel-a questionnaire study.

The aim of the study was to determine the impact that PHTLS® course participation had on self-confidence of emergency personnel, regarding the pre-hospital treatment of patients who had suffered severe trauma. Furthermore, the goal was to determine the impact of specific medical profession, work experience and prior course participation had on the benefits of PHTLS® training. A structured questionnaire study was performed. Healthcare providers from local emergency services involved in pre-hospital care in the metropolitan area of Zurich (Switzerland, Europe) who completed a PHTLS® course were included. Altered self-confidence, communication, and routines in the treatment of severe trauma patients were examined. The impact of prior course participation, work experience and profession on course benefits were evaluated. The response rate was 76%. A total of 6 transport paramedics (TPs), 66 emergency paramedics (EPs) and 15 emergency doctors (EDs) were included. Emergency paramedics had significantly more work experience compared with EDs (respectively 7.1 ± 5.7 yrs. vs. 4.5 ± 2.1 yrs., p = 0.004). 86% of the participants reported increased self-confidence in the pre-hospital management of severe trauma upon PHTLS® training completion. Moreover, according to 84% of respondents, extramural treatment of trauma changed upon course completion. PHTLS® course participants had improved communication in 93% of cases. This was significantly more frequent in EPs than TPs (p = 0.03). Multivariable analysis revealed emergency paramedics benefit the most from PHTLS® course participation. The current study shows that PHTLS® training is associated with improved self-confidence and enhanced communication, with regards to treatment of severe trauma patients in a pre-hospital setting, among medical emergency personnel. Additionally, emergency paramedics who took the PHTLS® course improved in overall self-confidence. These findings imply that all medical personal involved in the pre-hospital care of trauma patients, in a metropolitan area in Europe, do benefit from PHTLS® training. This was independent of the profession, previous working experience or prior alternative course participation.

Impact of first medical contact-teams on the quality of prehospital care of emergency patients in a hot-spot area of a major city

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Niedrigprioritäre Hilfeersuchen – sogenannte Low-code-Einsätze – machen einen erheblichen Teil der Einsätze im Rettungsdienst in sogenannten Hotspot-Arealen einer Großstadt aus. Ziel unserer Arbeit war es, die im Rahmen des Projekts „Altstadtwache Düsseldorf“ angewendete Dringlichkeitseinschätzung von Erstversorgungstrupps zu bewerten, eine mögliche Fehleinschätzung zu erfassen und die Auswirkungen auf die Versorgungsqualität zu untersuchen. Material und Methoden Im Rahmen des Projekts wurde begleitend eine prospektive monozentrische Beobachtungsstudie durchgeführt. Es wurden Erstversorgungstrupps (EVT) eingesetzt, die zentral stationiert waren und parallel zum Regelrettungsdienst alarmiert wurden. Einsatzzeiten waren die zu erwartenden Hochfrequenzphasen an Frei- und Samstagen von 19 bis 1 Uhr des Folgetags. Der Erhebungszeitraum erstreckte sich über drei Monate von 12/2022 bis 02/2023. Ergebnisse Im Untersuchungszeitraum von 12/2022 bis 02/2023 wurden 257 Einsätze im Hotspot-Areal der Düsseldorfer Altstadt disponiert. 85 Einsätze wurden ausgeschlossen. Von den 162 Primäreinsätzen waren 10 Fehleinsätze (6 %). Aus der Grundpopulation wurden zwei Gruppen gebildet. Gruppe A waren 83 (55 %) Patienten, die ins Krankenhaus transportiert wurden. Häufigstes Transportmittel war der KTW, der eigens hierfür vorgehalten wurde, mit 44 (29 %) Transporten, gefolgt von RTW-Transporten mit 32 (21 %). Schlussfolgerung Durch die korrekte Einschätzung der Erkrankungs- oder Verletzungsschwere können höherwertige Rettungsmittel des Regelrettungsdiensts in den Abendstunden von Wochenenden durch sinnvollen Einsatz eines Krankentransportwagens oder anderer Versorgungsstrukturen geschont und die Arbeitsbelastung durch Bagatelleinsätze in Hotspot-Arealen verhindert werden. Graphic abstract

Effects of physician-present prehospital care in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on return of spontaneous circulation: A retrospective, observational study in Saga, Japan.

Emergency medical services for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) vary according to region and country, and patient prognosis differs accordingly. In Japan, physicians may provide prehospital care. However, the effect of physician-present prehospital care on achieving return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in patients with cardiac arrest is not clear. Here, we aimed to examine the effect of physician-present prehospital care on the prognosis of patients with OHCA at our hospital compared with physician-absent care. In this retrospective, observational study, patients aged ≥18 years with non-traumatic OHCA from a single center in Saga City, Japan, between April 2011 and December 2019, were included. Patients were divided into two groups, based on prehospital physician presence or absence. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between physician-present prehospital care and ROSC. Of 820 patients with OHCA, 151 had a physician present and 669 did not. Logistic regression analysis with no adjustment showed that the odds ratio (OR) of physician-present prehospital care for an increased ROSC rate was 1.74 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-2.48, p = 0.002). Logistic-regression analysis adjusted for ROSC-related factors indicated an ORof 1.05 (95% CI:0.47-2.34, p = 0.914) for physician-present prehospital care to ROSC. Physician-present prehospital care may not necessarily lead to increased ROSC rates. However, insufficient data limited our study findings. Further studies involving larger sample sizes are warranted.

Addressing the research deficiencies in selective brain cooling methods in prehospital care for stroke patients.

Addressing the research deficiencies in selective brain cooling methods in prehospital care for stroke patients.

Short-term outcomes of prehospital opioid pain management for older adults with fall-related injury.

Opioids are recommended for pain management in patients being cared for and transported by emergency medical services, but no specific guidelines exist for older adults with fall-related injury. Prior research suggests prehospital opioid administration can effectively manage pain in older adults, but less is known about safety in this population. We compared short-term safety outcomes, including delirium, disposition, and length of stay, among older adults with fall-related injury according to whether they received prehospital opioid analgesia. We linked Medicare claims data with prehospital patient care reports for older adults (≥65) with fall-related injury in Illinois between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2015. We used weighted regression models (logistic, multinomial logistic, and Poisson) to assess the association between prehospital opioid analgesia and incidence of inpatient delirium, hospital disposition, and length of stay. Of 28,150 included older adults, 3% received prehospital opioids. Patients receiving prehospital opioids (vs. no prehospital opioids) were less likely to be discharged home from the emergency department (adjusted probability = 0.30 [95% CI: 0.25, 0.34] vs. 0.47 [95% CI: 0.46, 0.48]), more likely to be discharged to a non-home setting after an inpatient admission (adjusted probability = 0.43 [95% CI: 0.39, 0.48] vs. 0.30 [95% CI: 0.30, 0.31]), had inpatient length of stay 0.4 days shorter (p < 0.001) and ICU length of stay 0.7 days shorter (p = 0.045). Incidence of delirium did not vary between treatment and control groups. Few older adults receive opioid analgesia in the prehospital setting. Prehospital opioid analgesia may be associated with hospital disposition and length of stay for older adults with fall-related injury. However, our findings do not provide evidence of an association with inpatient delirium. These findings should be considered when developing guidelines for prehospital pain management specific to the older adult population.

Disparities in prehospital and emergency surgical care among patients with perforated ulcers and a history of mental illness: a nationwide cohort study

PurposeTo compare patients with and without a history of mental illness on process and outcome measures in relation to prehospital and emergency surgical care for patients with perforated ulcer.MethodsA nationwide registry-based cohort study of patients undergoing emergency surgery for perforated ulcer. We used data from the Danish Prehospital Database 2016–2017 and the Danish Emergency Surgery Registry 2004–2018 combined with data from other Danish databases. Patients were categorized according to severity of mental health history.ResultsWe identified 4.767 patients undergoing emergency surgery for perforated ulcer. Among patients calling the EMS with no history of mental illness, 51% were identified with abdominal pain when calling the EMS compared to 31% and 25% among patients with a history of moderate and major mental illness, respectively. Median time from hospital arrival to surgery was 6.0 h (IQR: 3.6;10.7). Adjusting for age, sex and comorbidity, patients with a history of major mental illness underwent surgery 46 min (95% CI: 4;88) later compared to patients with no history of mental illness. Median number of days-alive-and-out-of-hospital at 90-day follow-up was 67 days (IQR: 0;83). Adjusting for age, sex and comorbidity, patients with a history of major mental illness had 9 days (95% CI: 4;14) less alive and out-of-hospital at 90-day follow-up.ConclusionOne-third of the population had a history of mental illness or vulnerability. Patients with a history of major mental illness were less likely to be identified with abdominal pain if calling the EMS prior to arrival. They had longer delays from hospital arrival to surgery and higher mortality.

Abstract HUP5: Patient and Hospital Characteristics Associated With Disparities in Acute Stroke Treatment in Community and Academic Hospitals

Introduction: Expedited transportation, identification, and coordination of care are essential drivers of optimal outcomes in the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but systemic biases and barriers may affect these processes. We assessed patient- and hospital-level factors that may be associated with differences in prehospital and emergency department care processes for patients with AIS at academic medical centers (AMC) and those at community hospitals (CH). Methods: We retrospectively collected data from the electronic health record at an academic medical center (Tufts Medical Center) for adults age ≥ 18 hospitalized with AIS between 1/1/2018-12/31/2020, including patients who presented directly to the AMC versus patients transferred from a CH for further care. We performed multivariate analyses to assess predictors of emergency medical service (EMS) use, stroke code activation, door-to-CT time, and door-to-needle time across all patients and in each group. Results: 542 patients were included. AMC patients identifying as Asian (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13-0.47) and Hispanic (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.72) and CH patients identifying as Black (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.17-0.62) were less likely to use EMS compared to white patients. Patients with non-English primary language were less likely to use EMS (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.23-0.63) compared to English-speaking patients in all hospitals. CH patients identifying as Hispanic were less likely to have stroke code activation (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.05-0.86) compared to white patients. There were no differences in median door-to-CT or door-to-needle times between CH and AMC patients. In analyses including all patients, Asian race was associated with longer door-to-CT time (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.49), and female sex was associated with longer door-to-needle time (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.03-1.43). Conclusion: There are multiple potential sources of disparity in prehospital and hospital-based hyperacute care for patients with AIS including sex, race, ethnicity, and non-English primary language. These may represent opportunities for community outreach on EMS use, interventions to address systemic racism among healthcare providers, and interventions to alleviate language barriers.

Prehospital care and interfacility transfer of trauma patients before reaching the emergency of a level-1 trauma care center.

Management of trauma patients includes prevention, prehospital care, appropriate resuscitation at a hospital, definitive treatment, and rehabilitation. Timely and adequate care for a trauma patient is paramount, which can dramatically impact survival. This study was planned to assess the proportion of patients who failed to receive adequate prehospital care before reaching our institute. A retrospective study was conducted in the trauma and emergency department of a level-1 trauma center in eastern India from February to April 2022. The demographic profile, vital parameters, injury, mode of transport, travel duration, referring hospital, and any interventions as per airway/breathing/circulation/hypothermia were collected. The records of a hundred-two patients who were brought to the trauma and emergency department in the study period were reviewed. Road traffic accident involving two wheelers was the leading cause of injury. Eighty-three percent of the patients were referred from other health centers, of which 49 were referred from district headquarters hospitals. Only three patients out of 14 had been provided with an oropharyngeal airway for whom endotracheal intubation was indicated. Only one among the 41 patients needing Philadelphia collar actually received. Sixteen patients were provided supplemental oxygen out of the 35 for whom it was indicated. Out of 68 patients in whom intravenous cannulation and fluid administration were indicated, only 35 patients had received it. Out of 31 patients with fractures, none were provided immobilization. The care of the trauma patients with respect to airway, breathing, circulation, and fracture immobilization was found to be grossly inadequate, emphasizing the need of structured and protocol based prehospital trauma care.

Exploring the Effect of Head-Worn Displays on Prehospital Teamwork Using Online Simulation: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial.

Prehospital teamwork occurs in dynamic environments where paramedics work together using technologies to care for patients. Despite increasing interest in using head-worn displays (HWDs) to support prehospital workers, little is known about how HWDs affect teamwork. We tested the effect of HWDs on the team processes and patient care of paramedic trainee teams in a laboratory study using an online prehospital simulation environment, SPECTRa. In a randomized crossover design, 20 two-person teams worked in the SPECTRa laptop environment from separate physical rooms to assess and treat 2 simulated patients in 3 prehospital patient care scenarios. In each scenario, each trainee used either an HWD, a tablet computer (TAB), or no mobile device (CON) to help them monitor the vital signs of both patients. We measured team processes based around 3 themes of mutual understanding, team performance, and administered an 18-item questionnaire about teamwork and use of the devices. The mean number (HWD = 11; TAB = 7; P = 0.061) and duration (HWD = 1746 milliseconds; TAB = 1563 milliseconds; P = 0.504) of attention switches that teams made toward the mobile device did not differ with HWDs or TABs. However, teams switched attention between patients less with HWDs than with TABs ( P = 0.026) or CON ( P = 0.007) (medians: HWD = 5; TAB = 8; CON = 8). Teams communicated less when using HWDs than TABs ( P = 0.017) (medians: HWD = 76; TAB = 96; CON = 83), but there were other mixed effects on communication. Team performance did not differ across device conditions on the timeliness to notice critical patient changes ( P = 0.387) (medians: HWD = 244 seconds; TAB = 246 seconds; CON = 168 seconds) or to complete the scenarios ( P = 0.212) (medians: HWD = 800 seconds; TAB = 913 seconds; CON = 835 seconds). Questionnaire results revealed some perceived benefits of the HWD. Head-worn displays may let prehospital teams monitor each other's performance more efficiently than TABs or CON, requiring less communication to maintain patient care performance with lower workload than with TABs. However, improvements in mutual understanding with HWDs compared with CON were more evident in teams' preferences than in actual behavior. Further research is needed to confirm and extend these results.