Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Discussion Research Articles

Breaking barriers: Assessing pre-exposure prophylaxis awareness and willingness to use in the Lebanese community.

In the evolving HIV landscape, the Middle East and Northern Africa (MENA) grapples with data gaps, hindering the 95-95-95 targets. Lebanon, despite progress, falls short. Our study addresses Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) gaps for effective HIV prevention. Surveying 410 participants via snowball sampling and an online questionnaire, we analyzed data with chi-square and regression over 5months for insights into PrEP awareness and readiness. Summarizing the pivotal statistical outcomes of the study, 22.2% reported awareness of PrEP, showcasing diverse knowledge levels about its purpose and usage. Out of them, 57.1% expressed a willingness to use it; while a mere 5.5% have utilized it. The study reveals diverse demographic profiles, with age influencing PrEP awareness and willingness to use. Positive correlations exist between PrEP discussions within social circles, increased information availability, and elevated willingness. Financial considerations and accessibility at pharmacies emerge as critical determinants, guiding the development of targeted interventions. This analysis emphasizes tailored education, community initiatives, and policy enhancements to address PrEP challenges in Lebanon. Guiding public health initiatives, our study considers age, social dynamics, education, and accessibility in HIV prevention.

Continuing Low Awareness and Use of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV among People Who Inject Drugs (PWID), San Francisco, 2022.

Clinical trials provide evidence that pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prevents HIV acquisition including through sharing of injection equipment among people who inject drugs (PWID). However, uptake among many populations at risk for HIV has been slow, particularly among PWID. We examined data from the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS) from San Francisco in 2022 to measure PrEP uptake and identify factors associated with PrEP awareness among PWID. Of 479 PWID with HIV-negative or unknown HIV status, 54.9% were aware of PrEP, 5.9% had discussed PrEP with a healthcare provider, and 1.5% had used PrEP in the past year. Lack of PrEP awareness was associated with being age 50 years and older (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.40, 95% CI 0.27-0.60), being men who have sex with women (vs. men who have sex with men, aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.24-0.92), having a disability (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.95), using heroin as their most frequently injected drug (aOR 0.51, 95% CI, 0.34-0.78), not having tested for HIV, HCV, or an STD in the past year (aOR 0.43, 95% CI 0.28-0.64), and not having access to new sterile needles in the past year (aOR 0.28, 95%CI 0.08-1.00). We found negligible change in the awareness and uptake of PrEP among PWID since previously measured in NHBS in 2018. Low PrEP use among PWID may be addressed by increasing provider discussion of PrEP with their PWID patients and clients during routine care, expanding testing for injection-related infections among PWID, and integrating PrEP access into harm reduction programs.

Characteristics Associated with Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Discussion and Use Among Transgender Women Without HIV Infection - National HIV Behavioral Surveillance Among Transgender Women, Seven Urban Areas, United States, 2019-2020.

CDC recommends pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for transgender women who have sex with men and who report sexual behaviors that place them at substantial ongoing risk for HIV exposure, including those who engage in nonsterile syringe sharing. Providing transgender women with access to PrEP is a critical strategy for reducing HIV acquisition and ending the HIV epidemic. Survey results from the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance Among Transgender Women were used to assess characteristics associated with past-year discussions of PrEP with a health care provider and PrEP use. Bivariate analyses were conducted to assess the association between covariates (sociodemographic, HIV-associated characteristics, and gender-affirming care) and each outcome, accounting for sampling design. All covariates that were statistically significant at p<0.05 in the bivariate analyses were included in multivariate models, and manual backward elimination was used to obtain final models that retained statistically significant covariates. Among 902 transgender women from seven urban areas in the United States without HIV infection in the analyses, 57% had recently discussed PrEP with a health care provider, and 32% recently had used PrEP. In the final multivariate model, the following subgroups of transgender women were more likely to report recent PrEP use: those who identified as Black or African American or Hispanic or Latina, had two or more sex partners in the past 12 months, had condomless sex in the past 12 months, reported their last sex partner was infected with HIV, had condomless sex with their last sex partner whose HIV status was positive or unknown, ever had transgender-specific health care, and currently had transgender-specific health insurance coverage. Participants who were less likely to have recently used PrEP were those who wanted to but were not currently taking hormones and those aged <40 years. Providing increased access to gender-affirming care and training health care providers who serve transgender women to incorporate PrEP into existing services might increase PrEP use among transgender women.

Implementing an Automated Prediction Model to Improve Prescribing of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis

Summary Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is nearly 100% effective at decreasing HIV acquisition but is underused in priority populations. Primary care clinicians need tools to help them identify persons likely to benefit from PrEP use and prescribe it when appropriate. The researchers developed and validated an automated decision support tool with interactive alerts in the electronic health record to increase PrEP discussions and prescribing in primary care. They piloted the tool at three federally qualified health centers and assessed feasibility, acceptance by clinicians, and preliminary impact on PrEP care. Of 33,803 patients who visited the pilot clinics from July 2022 through January 2023, providers received PrEP alerts at the point of care for 2.2% of patients, demonstrating feasibility. Although numbers of PrEP prescriptions remained low, the proportion of all patients with new PrEP prescriptions was 4.5 times higher at pilot clinics compared with matched control clinics (0.09% vs. 0.02%). Implementation of the decision support tool was associated with a statistically nonsignificant 5.5% increase in HIV tests per 100 patients. In qualitative interviews, providers said the tool facilitated PrEP discussions with patients, particularly for those patients who would not have initiated discussions because of stigma. The researchers found that acceptance, use, and impact of machine-learning models for PrEP depends on collaborating with and building trust among providers, including blending a data-driven approach to identifying patients at increased risk for HIV acquisition with providers’ traditional decision-making framework. These approaches could be useful for health care organizations seeking to implement automated prediction models across all areas of medicine.

Factors Associated with Comfort Discussing PrEP with Healthcare Providers among Black Cisgender Women.

Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention uptake remains low among Black cisgender women in the United States, despite their disproportionate HIV burden. This study aimed to examine factors associated with Black women's comfort discussing PrEP with healthcare providers and its link to their interest in PrEP use. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with a national sample of 315 Black cisgender women. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were utilized for data analysis. The results showed that 79% of Black women felt comfortable discussing PrEP with their healthcare provider. Age, recent healthcare provider visit, interest in PrEP, and positive social norms were associated with increased odds of comfort in discussing PrEP, while anticipated PrEP disapproval and stigma were associated with decreased odds. Older age was related to greater comfort, potentially due to increased familiarity and self-efficacy in discussing sexual health. Recent healthcare utilization indicated positive provider relationships, facilitating discussions about sexual health. Anticipating support from social networks positively influenced comfort levels. Conversely, PrEP-related stigma and anticipated disapproval were barriers to comfort. These findings highlight the importance of provider-patient communication and social support in facilitating PrEP engagement among Black cisgender women. Interventions should consider age-appropriate strategies and address structural and provider biases to improve PrEP discussions and promote HIV prevention.

HIV in youth prevention in the emergency department initiative: A survey of pediatric emergency medicine providers

BackgroundThe incidence of HIV among adolescents remains high, and adolescents are known to participate in sexual behaviors that increase their risk for HIV, such as unprotected sex and sex with multiple partners. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been shown to be effective at preventing HIV when taken daily and is approved by the FDA for use in adolescents. Efforts to screen patients in adult emergency departments and connect them with PrEP services have been validated. We surveyed pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) providers to determine their knowledge of PrEP, prescribing practices, willingness to prescribe, and barriers to a screening protocol in the pediatric emergency department (PED). MethodsWe administered a survey to a multidisciplinary group of PEM providers to measure knowledge, use, willingness, and implementation barriers to PrEP as well as elements needed for a successful referral system. ResultsA total of 87 responses were included for analysis. While 79.1% of all providers had heard of PrEP, only 14.8% of prescribing providers had ever discussed PrEP with a patient, and none had ever prescribed PrEP. Overall, 76.3% of all providers were knowledgeable about PrEP based on answers to true/false questions, with prescribing providers significantly more likely to be knowledgeable compared to nurses (p = 0.005). Knowledgeable providers had higher willingness scores to refer for PrEP compared to providers who were not knowledgeable. Ninety-two percent of providers felt a PrEP referral process from the PED would be feasible. Creation of an eligibility algorithm and educational materials were the most common efforts providers preferred to make them more likely to refer for PrEP. The most notable barriers perceived by providers included patient noncompliance with therapy (20.9%), acceptance of PrEP discussion among patients and parents (19.8%), and cost of therapy (15.1%). ConclusionPEM providers are knowledgeable about PrEP but have little experience with discussing or prescribing PrEP. Their willingness to refer for PrEP and anticipated feasibility of a PrEP referral system is encouraging. These results support the need for future educational efforts among PEM providers and creation of referral systems for PrEP services from the PED.

Predictors of PrEP awareness, PrEP discussion and interest in long-acting injectable PrEP among Filipina transfeminine adults.

Transfeminine adults are impacted by the HIV epidemic in the Philippines, and newly approved modalities of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), including long-acting injectable (LAI-PrEP), could be beneficial for this group. To inform implementation, we analysed PrEP awareness, discussion and interest in taking LAI-PrEP among Filipina transfeminine adults. We utilized secondary data from the #ParaSaAtin survey that sampled Filipina transfeminine adults (n = 139) and conducted a series of multivariable logistic regressions with lasso selection to explore factors independently associated with PrEP outcomes, including awareness, discussion with trans friends and interest in LAI-PrEP. Overall, 53% of Filipina transfeminine respondents were aware of PrEP, 39% had discussed PrEP with their trans friends and 73% were interested in LAI-PrEP. PrEP awareness was associated with being non-Catholic (p = 0.017), having previously been HIV tested (p = 0.023), discussing HIV services with a provider (p<0.001) and having high HIV knowledge (p= 0.021). Discussing PrEP with friends was associated with older age (p = 0.040), having experienced healthcare discrimination due to transgender identity (p = 0.044), having HIV tested (p = 0.001) and having discussed HIV services with a provider (p < 0.001). Very interested in LAI-PrEP was associated with living in Central Visayas (p = 0.045), having discussed HIV services with a provider (p = 0.001) and having discussed HIV services with a sexual partner (p = 0.008). Implementing LAI-PrEP in the Philippines requires addressing systemic improvements across personal, interpersonal, social and structural levels in healthcare access, including efforts to create healthcare settings and environments with providers who are trained and competent in transgender health and can address the social and structural drivers of trans health inequities, including HIV and barriers to LAI-PrEP.

The Association Between Medical Distrust and the Intention to Initiate Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in HIV-Seronegative Cisgender Women of Color Within the DC Area [ID: 1377701

INTRODUCTION: Black cisgender women bear a disproportionate burden of the U.S. human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic, compared to women of other racial groups. Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective prevention tool. Evidence indicates that Black women are interested in initiating PrEP, but low utilization persists in this population. Historical mistreatment of women of color and the resulting distrust erect barriers to open communication and shared decision-making with health care providers. METHODS: Using an IRB-approved questionnaire, we surveyed 186 consenting adults (83% Black, 9% White, 3% American Indian/Alaskan Native, 4% Other), who were PrEP eligible, HIV seronegative, cisgender women, recruited from family planning and obstetrics and gynecology specialty clinics in Washington, DC. We tested the interaction of patient racial identification and group-based medical mistrust on intentions to use PrEP, as mediated by intentions to discuss PrEP with a health care provider during the imminent clinical interaction. RESULTS: Results indicate significant moderated mediation of the interaction between race and distrust on intention to initiate PrEP at 3 months (index −0.3093, SE 0.1886, 95% CI [–0.7455,–0.0122]) and 12 months (index −0.3248, SE 0.1987, 95% CI [–0.7827,–0.0040]) through anticipated discussion with a provider. CONCLUSION: When distrust is low, Black women had stronger intentions to utilize PrEP (relative to women of other racial groups). This was explained by stronger intentions to discuss PrEP with the provider during the clinical visit. This relationship was nonsignificant at moderate and high levels of distrust. These results underscore the critical importance of provider-initiated discussion of PrEP with women to improve health equity.

Variations in Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Awareness and Healthcare Provider Interactions in a Nationally Representative Sample of American Men Aged 15-49 Years: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Awareness of and discussions with a healthcare provider (HCP) around pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), an effective HIV prevention method, are associated with PrEP uptake, yet few studies utilize representative samples or report on these outcomes using distinct behavioral risk subgroups. This cross-sectional study utilized responses given by men on the 2017-2019 National Survey of Family Growth, a nationally representative survey of Americans aged 15-49years. Multiple logistic regression models were used to determine how respondents' sociodemographic characteristics and HIV risk behaviors were related to PrEP awareness and HCP discussions. PrEP awareness was low (29.40%) as was the proportion who reported ever discussing PrEP with an HCP (4.48%). Odds of being PrEP aware and discussing PrEP with an HCP varied significantly within sexual behavior subgroups based on sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics highlighting the differential risks within distinct behavioral subgroupings of men. Sexual behavior subgroupings should be considered when promoting PrEP awareness and discussions as HIV risk behaviors vary considerably and sexual identity alone may not sufficiently capture one's HIV risk.

PrEP disclosure and discussions within social networks of people who inject drugs experiencing homelessness: a brief report

BackgroundIn the context of increasing injection-related HIV outbreaks across the United States, particularly among people who inject drugs (PWID) experiencing homelessness, there is an urgent need to expand access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention. Peer-based interventions for PrEP could be helpful for promoting PrEP uptake, yet the social experiences of using PrEP among PWID experiencing homelessness have not been thoroughly explored.MethodsTo better understand social experiences surrounding PrEP use among PWID experiencing homelessness, we conducted qualitative interviews from March-December 2020 with current and former PrEP patients of an innovative, low-threshold program implemented by Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program (BHCHP) in Boston, MA. Thematic analysis of coded interview data explored participants’ perspectives and experiences with PrEP disclosure and discussions within their social networks.ResultsAmong interviews with 21 participants, we identified the following four interrelated aspects of their social experiences using PrEP: (1) participants’ were aware of increasing HIV transmission within their social networks, which motivated their PrEP use and disclosure; (2) participants generally avoided disclosing their PrEP use within public spaces or casual conversations; (3) participants expressed greater willingness to discuss PrEP with their close social contacts; and (4) some participants self-identified as leaders or expressed interest in leading the dissemination of PrEP information within their social networks.ConclusionsFindings highlight the significance of PrEP disclosure and discussions within the social networks of PWID experiencing homelessness, suggesting a need for continued social network and intervention research—particularly to establish the feasibility and acceptability of peer-based interventions for promoting PrEP—with this marginalized population.

Missed Opportunities When We Focus only on Risk: Using the Concerns Based Conversation Starter to Identify Potential PrEP Candidates.

Collection and use of self-reported HIV sexual risk-behaviors to identify pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) candidates is common practice in PrEP providing and referral services. Critiques of this strategy highlight overreliance on self-report and contribution to ongoing PrEP stigma. As an alternative (or complimentary) approach, we evaluated a 5-item Concerns Based Conversation Starter (CBCS) that could be used to identify individuals who could benefit from PrEP. The CBCS was included in the 2019 cycle of the American Men's Internet Survey. Item responses were characterized overall and in relation to CDC risk-based PrEP indication and reported willingness to use PrEP. In total, 1606 HIV-negative men who have sex with men not on PrEP were evaluated. Of these, 50% were below the age of 25, 11% Black, 16% Latino, and 64% White. Across the sample, 61% (986) met risk-based criteria for PrEP indication, 80% (1278) were identified by the CBCS, and 52% (835) were flagged by both. The CBCS uniquely identified 28% (443) for follow-up PrEP discussions that would have been missed by a risk-based only approach. Only 9% (151) of the sample had risk-based indication but did not report concerns. Over half of those flagged by the CBCS expressed willingness to use PrEP. The CBCS identified more people than a risk-based indication approach, with most also reporting an interest in using PrEP. A small percentage of risk-indicated participants were 'missed' by the CBCS. As PrEP options and access points expand, implementation tools like the CBCS can facilitate more wide-scale, values-focused PrEP implementation.

2057. A Social Network Strategy for HIV Self-Test Kit Distribution through PrEP Program Clients

Abstract Background HIV testing allows care engagement of people living with HIV and PrEP for those who test negative. Social network strategy (SNS) interventions may facilitate distribution of HIV self-test (ST) kits to individuals who do not routinely test for HIV. The University of Miami pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) program offers low-barrier PrEP/HIV prevention services through mobile and static clinics in Miami-Dade County. Current PrEP clients may be ideal distributors of HIV ST kits and PrEP information within their social networks. Methods Study activities occurred in Miami from November 2021 to March 2022. At PrEP visits, participants (n = 96) were given Ora-Quick oral fluid ST kits for distribution to their social network members. Participant surveys included demographics, feelings of closeness to network members, history of PrEP conversations, and intention for future PrEP conversations. Descriptive statistics included mean and range for continuous variables and frequencies for categorical variables. Network visualizations were constructed using UCINet and NetDraw. Bivariate and regression analysis, conducted in R, assessed the relationship between demographic characteristics of the client and the proportion of network members who discussed PrEP and plan to discuss PrEP in the future between and across networks. Results A network visualization displays clients (n=96) and their social networks (n=426). Clients and network members were a majority male (84.7%) and of Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity (78.8%). Within and between network analysis indicated that networks differed significantly in reported closeness and frequency of PrEP discussions (F = 2.97; p-value 0.01, F = 17.45; p &amp;lt; 0.03, respectively). Age and average reported closeness of the ego were independently and jointly associated with an increase in the likelihood of future PrEP conversations (estimate = 0.02; p-value &amp;lt; 0.01; estimate = 0.24; p –value &amp;lt; 0.01, respectively). Figure 1:PrEP Discussion &amp; Closeness Node color reflects PrEP discussion and node size reflects client reported closeness Conclusion We demonstrate the feasibility of disseminating HIV ST kits and PrEP information through SNS. Emotionally closely linked networks, with similar characteristics (i.e., age) may be most effective for this SNS strategy. Disclosures Susanne Doblecki-Lewis, MD, MSPH, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support.

2070. Risk Factors Affecting PrEP Offering and Uptake Among At-Risk Youth in an Area of High HIV Prevalence

Abstract Background New HIV cases are steadily reported in our community among at-risk youth despite the availability of highly effective pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Although providers regularly offer PrEP during sexually transmitted disease (STD) screening visits, PrEP utilization rates remain low among those patients. The primary outcomes of this study are determining the rates of PrEP offering and uptake in high-risk individuals seeking care for STD screening at local youth clinics and whether these rates differ by demographic factors. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted on 218 charts of patients ages 18 - 24 years with risk factors for HIV infection who sought care at a youth clinic in Tampa, FL between 2018 and 2020. PrEP offering and utilization rates were compared across demographic and risk factor variables using Chi-square tests for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables. Results Of 218 patients, 86 (39.4%) were offered or had a documented discussion of PrEP at their visit but uptake occurred only in 22 (10.1%). Factors associated with offerings are depicted in table 1. Factors associated with uptake are depicted in table 2. Age at first visit, insurance type, level of education, and employment did not significantly impact PrEP offering or uptake. Additionally, there was no significant difference in PrEP uptake associated with race or ethnicity. PrEP Offerings Demographic characteristics associated with offering and uptake of PrEP among young people screened for STD in a high prevalence of HIV area PrEP Uptake Demographic characteristics associated with uptake of PrEP among young people screened for STD in a high prevalence of HIV area Conclusion This study highlights differences in offering and uptake of PrEP among young adults with a high risk of acquiring HIV living in a high prevalence of HIV area. Males and MSM are offered more PrEP and also use it more. Black patients are less likely to be offered PrEP. These differences emphasize the need for interventions to improve the rate of PrEP discussions among female and black patients at risk for HIV and to improve adherence to PrEP among young individuals at risk of HIV infection. Interventions targeting these demographics may lessen disparities and incidence of HIV in the community. Moving forward we will continue to investigate additional data collected on PrEP compliance at 6mo and at 12mo follow-ups among our patient population. Future studies with qualitative data identifying barriers to use PrEP will provide important information on this topic. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Perceptions and attitudes regarding HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among dermatology clinicians and trainees.

In 2020, over 1.2 million people were at risk of acquiring human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), though only 25% were prescribed pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Given the multitude of dermatologic manifestations of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, dermatologic care can serve as the entry point to the HIV care continuum. Currently, there is limited data on specialists' perspectives on HIV PrEP prescribing. We aimed to survey clinicians and trainees in an academic dermatology department about HIV PrEP-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Survey questions were adapted from existing literature on HIV stigma and PrEP-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Composite scores for each domain were averaged and compared between clinicians and trainees using Wilcoxon's signed rank test or Fisher's exact test. Of 135 providers invited, 31 (23%) completed the survey (11 clinicians and 20 trainees). Of the 31 participants, 16 (52%) had specialized HIV experience and training. When asked about discriminatory beliefs, nine participants (29%) agreed that HIV infection is a "consequence of irresponsible behavior." PrEP knowledge was low, with 13 (42%) participants answering zero out of 3 PrEP knowledge questions correctly. Additionally, 10 (91%) clinicians reported poor knowledge of PrEP side effects, and eight clinicians (73%) indicated they were "not comfortable at all" in prescribing PrEP. No participant had prescribed PrEP, and 22 (70%) participants had never discussed PrEP with patients. Dermatology clinicians and trainees reported some levels of HIV stigma. Substantial gaps in PrEP knowledge and discussion were reported despite prior HIV discrimination training and HIV-related practice experience. Study limitations include a small sample size and a modest response rate. Addressing stigma among dermatologists and improving HIV PrEP education is vital to enhancing the healthcare outcomes of people living with HIV.

PrEP Demographics and Disparity: The Race, Ethnicity, Gender Identity, Sex Assigned at Birth, Sexual Orientation and Age of Current PrEP Use

ABSTRACT Purpose Identification of disparity in preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prescription by demographic group. Design Exploratory descriptive study. Methods Secondary data analysis of 1114 patients who received PrEP from Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts (PPLM) between 2017 and 2020. Findings Persons of Asian racial-identity had a higher mean PrEP prescription than the other racial groups. Persons over 30 had a higher mean PrEP prescription than those 18–29. Conclusions Discrepancy of PrEP prescription reveals opportunities to improve PrEP delivery. Clinical Evidence Providers of PrEP delivery and community health nurses can enhance delivery by better electronic medical charting regarding PrEP discussion and nonadherence.

Get2PrEP: An Electronic Medical Record Laboratory Comment Increased Safe Sex Counseling But Not Preexposure Prophylaxis Services at a Large Urban Academic Medical Center in Northern Manhattan.

HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remains underutilized despite its efficacy and potential population impact. Achieving PrEP's full potential depends on providers who are knowledgeable and comfortable prescribing it to individuals at risk of acquiring HIV. Previous educational interventions targeting provider-related uptake barriers have had limited success. We designed and tested an electronic medical record (EMR) interpretative comment to improve the delivery of PrEP. An EMR comment provided information on PrEP eligibility and referral resources to providers delivering positive chlamydia and gonorrhea results. Positive test results for bacterial sexually transmitted infections before intervention (January 1, 2019-August 23, 2019) and after intervention (August 24, 2019-December 31, 2019) were identified. A retrospective chart review was conducted to ascertain provider documentation of PrEP discussions or provision, HIV prevention discussions, and HIV screening. Pretest-posttest analysis was performed to compare the provision of PrEP and HIV prevention services. We reviewed 856 preintervention encounters spanning 8 months and 461 postencounters spanning 4 months. Patient demographics were comparable. We observed an increase in provider documentation of safe sex and condom counseling (odds ratios [ORs], 1.2 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.07-1.18] and 1.11 [95% CI, 1.05-1.17], respectively), and the absence of any HIV prevention discussion decreased (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80-0.90), but not HIV screening or PrEP documentation. We demonstrated that an EMR laboratory comment had a modest effect on increasing risk reduction counseling, although not HIV screening or PrEP prescriptions. Future strategies to encourage provider delivery of sexual health services may benefit from more targeted strategies that combine behavioral and information technology approaches.

Exploring the Role of Provider-Patient Communication in Women's Sexual Health and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Care in the Primary Care Settings in New York State of the United States.

Background: Women shoulder a disproportionate burden of HIV infection in the United States and worldwide. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective tool for HIV prevention, but its use is suboptimal. Primary care providers (PCP) are considered the ideal PrEP caregivers, but they generally underperform in PrEP care implementation. Methods: From 2020 to 2022, we employed semi-structured in-depth interviews to collect information about barriers and facilitators in PrEP care and beliefs and opinions regarding sexual wellness among 18 PCP and 29 PrEP-eligible women. We employed content analysis and thematic analysis to explore the transcribed narrative data. Results: The current study was guided by the “Communication Pathways” Framework. We studied how communication functions affect PrEP care and women’s sexual wellness on the pathways. We identified several specific pathways between communication and PrEP care implementation in primary care settings, including patient knowledge, linkage to care, therapeutic alliance, and decision making on PrEP care. A paradox regarding who should initiate the discussion regarding sexual history and PrEP care was identified. Conclusions: Findings suggested that a navigation and assistance system for PrEP care in patients and providers is urgently needed. Future studies should facilitate PrEP discussion, engagement, and monitoring in primary care settings.

IPV, PrEP, and Medical Mistrust.

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention method for women experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV). This study aimed to examine (1) relationships between physical, sexual, and psychological IPV and women's PrEP communication with a health care provider and domestic violence advocate; and (2) how IPV-specific medical mistrust modifies the association between IPV and PrEP communication. Data were from 2 studies conducted in Connecticut and Baltimore, MD on adult women experiencing IPV (N = 272). Logistic regressions examined associations between IPV, PrEP communication, and IPV-specific medical mistrust. The average age was 25.7. The most common identity was non-Hispanic black (37.1%), followed by non-Hispanic white (33.8%), Hispanic (20.6%), and non-Hispanic another racial group (8.5%). Higher severity of psychological IPV was associated with more embarrassment to initiate a PrEP discussion with a health care provider (P = 0.009) or domestic violence advocate (P = 0.026). However, women with more severe psychological IPV were more willing to accept a PrEP recommendation from a health care provider (P = 0.033) or domestic violence advocate (P = 0.044). IPV-specific medical mistrust modified the association between physical IPV and willingness to accept a PrEP recommendation by a domestic violence advocate, such that women with physical IPV were significantly less likely to accept a PrEP recommendation by a domestic violence advocate, but only for women with high IPV-specific medical mistrust (P = 0.021). PrEP initiation among women experiencing IPV may be strengthened by addressing and dismantling systems that perpetuate IPV-specific medical mistrust and stigma against IPV survivors.

Uptake of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination by HIV Status and HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Care Engagement Among Young Sexual Minority Men 17-24 Years Old in the USA.

HIV and human papillomavirus (HPV) are common sexually transmitted infections among young sexual minority men (YSMM) that are prevented by pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and HPV vaccination, respectively. We sought to determine the association between a history of PrEP use and HPV vaccination uptake among YSMM. Data were collected from an online survey of YSMM (n = 287; M age = 20.6 years, range: 17-24; 58% Black or Latinx) recruited from social media and men-for-men geosocial networking apps in 2020 and analyses were conducted using chi-squared comparisons and Poisson regression using STATA (IC) version 15.1. About half (45.0%) of YSMM reported receiving at least one dose of the HPV vaccine. Controlling for other factors, YSMM who were living with HIV or had used PrEP were significantly more likely to have received at least one dose of an HPV vaccine (PR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.52-4.07; PR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.26-2.31, respectively). YSMM living with HIV or with PrEP use experience reported higher rates of HPV vaccination compared to their counterparts, potentially due to greater utilization of health care or contacts with providers attuned to their health needs. Nevertheless, HPV vaccination uptake is suboptimal given the high prevalence of high-risk HPV genotypes among YSMM. Standard of care for YSMM should include revisiting HPV vaccination status and discussion of PrEP and other HIV prevention methods given suboptimal rates of HPV and PrEP uptake among this priority population for HPV vaccination, anal cancer, and HIV prevention.

857. Discussion and Initiation of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Were Rare Following Diagnoses of Sexually Transmitted Infections among Veterans

Abstract Background Healthcare encounters for the diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are common and represent a window of opportunity to discuss and initiate HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Little is known about how frequently PrEP is discussed and initiated in association with encounters for STIs. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort and nested case control study in the national Veterans Administration (VA) healthcare system to determine the frequency of PrEP discussion and initiation in association with clinical encounters for bacterial STIs (i.e. early syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia). We used administrative data to identify patients with a first STI based on ICD 9 / 10 codes from January 2013–December 2018 , excluding patients with prior HIV diagnosis or PrEP use, or STI diagnosed in context of a visit to initiate PrEP (Figure 1). We used pharmacy data to determine the frequency of PrEP initiation within 90 days of the encounter for STI in this cohort. In the case control study, we matched 90 PrEP starters to 180 non-starters by day of STI diagnosis and reviewed chart notes from the STI diagnosis encounter to determine frequency of documentation of sexual history taking and PrEP discussions among subsequent PrEP initiators and non-initiators. Results We identified 23,312 patients with a first STI, of whom 90 (0.4%) started PrEP within 90 days. Adjusting for age, PrEP initiation was associated with urban residence (OR=5.0, 95Cl 1.8–13.4), White compared to Black race (OR=1.7, 95 Cl 1.1–2.8), and syphilis diagnosis (OR = 7.4, 95 Cl 4.7–11.6, table 1). Chart review revealed that discussion of PrEP was rare among people with STIs who did not subsequently start PrEP (1.1%, 95 CI 0.1–4.0, table 2). PrEP initiation was associated with documentation of any sexual history (80.0% of initiators vs. 51.0% of non-initiators, p &amp;lt; 0.01) and discussion of PrEP (52.2% vs. 1.1%, p &amp;lt; 0.01) during the initial STI diagnosis encounter. Figure 1. Study flow chart Table 1. Characteristics of patients with a first healthcare encounter with an STI diagnosis, by PrEP initiation within 90 days of encounter. N= 23,312 Table 2. Chart review findings from case control study. Ninety people who initiated PrEP (i.e., “cases”) were randomly matched to 180 who did not initiate PrEP (i.e., “controls”) by date of STI. Conclusion Discussion and initiation of PrEP were rare in association with healthcare encounters for STIs. Not all individuals with STIs will benefit from starting PrEP, but interventions are needed to improve low rates of sexual history-taking and discussion of PrEP during healthcare encounters for STIs. Disclosures Bruce Alexander, PharmD, Bruce Alexander Consulting (Independent Contractor)