Pre-enrichment In Buffered Peptone Water Research Articles

Rapid detection of stressed Salmonella spp. in dairy and egg products using immunomagnetic separation and PCR

The rapid detection of an average of 5.9 stressed Salmonella cells in 25 g of food product using immunomagnetic separation (IMS) and PCR is described. For pasteurised egg yolk, egg yolk powder, ice-cream, whole egg, egg white and cheeses made from pasteurised milk PCR was applied after 16 h of preenrichment in buffered peptone water (BPW) using IMS and alkaline lysis as sample preparation method. For whole egg and egg white the BPW was supplemented with iron. For milk powder, and raw milk cheeses, the 16-h preenrichment in BPW was followed by IMS and a 4-h enrichment in Rappaport–Vassiliadis broth. In the latter case, PCR was applied on the enrichment medium after centrifugation and alkaline lysis. For PCR the primers ST11 and ST15 ( Aabo et al., 1993) producing a fragment of 429 bp were used. An internal PCR control, designed to be co-amplified with the target DNA using the same primers but producing a smaller fragment of 240 bp, was used.

Importance of pre-enrichment media for isolation of Salmonella spp. from swine and poultry

The performance of two new (1-day) culture methods, Salmonella Enrichment Broth (SEB) and Revive, and an alternative pre-enrichment broth, designated Universal pre-enrichment broth (UB), was compared to the internationally accepted buffered peptone water (BPW). The study was directed towards detection of Salmonella in 100 faecal samples from porcine and 100 neck-skin samples from poultry. The sensitivity (number of positive cases per method among all the positive cases) of the conventional pre-enrichment in BPW was found to be 0.77 for swine and 0.66 for poultry samples, while a combination of the BPW method with parallel pre-enrichment of the same sample in UB resulted in high sensitivity for swine (0.92) and poultry (0.95) samples. A 2-h pre-enrichment in the non-selective Revive, followed by overnight enrichment in selective broth, resulted in a low sensitivity, particularly for the neck-skin samples (0.16, P=0.001). The SEB method in the porcine samples resulted in a sensitivity (0.71) comparable to the standard method ( P=0.31). In conclusion, additional pre-enrichment of samples in UB may substantially increase the culture sensitivity. During routine screening of large numbers of samples, it may be advantageous to use SEB rather than standard culturing.