Pre-donation Interview Research Articles

Pre-donation interview as a tool to maintain the safety of donated blood: Assessment from bioethics

Pre-donation interview as a tool to maintain the safety of donated blood: Assessment from bioethics

Noncompliance with blood donor selection criteria - Complidon 2017, France.

Blood donor selection, consisting of a pre-donation questionnaire and interview, excludes potential donors who may be at risk of transfusion-transmissible infections. Assessing the reasons for noncompliance with blood donor selection criteria is important to maintain a high level of viral safety of blood products. An anonymous French online survey of a sample of blood donors (Complidon) was conducted from September to December 2017. Data were poststratified to be representative of all donors who donated blood between July 2016 and December 2017. Of 420,190 solicited donors, 108,386 completed the survey (26%). Overall, noncompliance was estimated at 5.6%. The least respected criteria regarded sex with more than one partner during the previous 4 months for donors (1.9%) and for donors' partners (1%), travel-related criteria (1.2%) and sex between men during the previous 12 months (0.73% of men). Reasons for noncompliance differed according to criteria. Donors who were non-compliant to sexuality-based criteria mainly said they did not want to be excluded or that the questions were too personal. Conversely, donors who were exclusively non-compliant to criteria other than sexuality-based criteria more often mentioned their non-compliance during the pre-donation interview but were nevertheless authorized to donate blood. Despite noncompliance to blood donor criteria being relatively low in France, it still represents a threat to blood safety. Accordingly, improved communication is important to ensure that donors fully understand each selection criterion and to emphasize to health professionals the importance of listening carefully without judging during pre-donation interviews.

Implementation of a script for predonation interviews: impact on human immunodeficiency virus risk in South African blood donors.

The way in which the donor history questionnaire is conducted plays a crucial role in the self-disclosure of behavioral risk factors for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection by prospective donors. The South African National Blood Service changed its policy on the process of donor assessment in May 2015 by implementing a compulsory interviewer script used to assess donor eligibility. A pre- and postevaluation study to determine the impact of scripted interviews on high-risk deferrals and recently acquired HIV infections. We used historical data to compare 18 months before and after the implementation of the script. We recorded a total of 3,169,656 donor presentations during the two 18-months periods, of which 52.2% (1,655,352) were made during the scripted period. A multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusting for donor and demographic characteristics found the odds of high-risk deferral to be slightly greater (odds ratio [OR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.07) during the scripted period. A separate multivariate logistic regression model, also adjusting for donor and demographic characteristics, showed that the odds of recently acquired HIV infection were significantly lower (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.97) during the scripted period. This study showed that implementation of a scripted interview was associated with increased HIV risk deferral and decreased recent HIV infection. This study indicates potential improvement in blood safety with the implementation of a scripted donor interview and has relevance to blood safety in other sub-Saharan African countries.

Context and social perceptions of blood donation in donors found positive for human immunodeficiency virus in France.

In France, information collected during postdonation interviews showed that a majority of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected donors were not eligible to donate as per donor selection criteria. In the interest of blood safety, this study aimed to explore the mechanisms of noncompliance with blood donor selection criteria, notably the permanent deferral of men who have sex with men (MSM). Semistructured individual interviews were conducted with 32 blood donors found positive for HIV between mid-2011 and 2014. Topics such as the experience and motivations for donating blood, understanding of selection criteria, sexual risk management, and opinions on donor selection were discussed. Transcripts were analyzed inductively. More than 50% of study participants were noncompliant with donor selection criteria. Reasons for nondisclosure of risk factors in the predonation questionnaire or the predonation interview included stigma, test-seeking motivations, symbolic attachment to blood donation, and context of donation. Compliance to donor criteria was seen as secondary by donors who reaped personal benefits from the symbolism of their donation. Donors lacked self-reflexivity in their assessment of risky sexual behavior. The "window period" and the underlying epidemiologic arguments for donor selection criteria were poorly understood. Nearly all participants disapproved of the permanent ban on blood donations from MSM. This study demonstrated the need for more communication on the epidemiologic basis for donor selection criteria and on the window period to facilitate donor compliance. These findings have already advanced improvements to predonation documents, in a larger context of 2016 donor selection criteria revision.

Postdonation iron replacement for maintaining iron stores in female whole blood donors in routine donor practice: results of two feasibility studies in Australia.

Iron deficiency represents a risk to donor health and the blood supply. Efficacy trials indicate that postdonation iron replacement improves iron stores but they do not account for complexities of implementation in the routine collection context. We therefore conducted two prospective feasibility studies in Australian donor centers. In both studies we recruited female donors between 18 and 45 years who had made at least one donation in the previous 12 months. In READ (replacement advice), female donors were given a recommendation to self-procure postdonation iron. In DIRECT (donor iron replacement), donors were provided with a course of iron supplements. Donors could return to donate at their discretion and were surveyed after the recruitment visit and again toward the end of the 13-month follow-up. Donor uptake, adverse effects, effectiveness in maintaining iron stores, and workflow impact were assessed. We recruited 1404 (70.9% of invited) donors to READ and 768 (53.2% of invited) to DIRECT. READ and DIRECT extended predonation interviews by 1 and 5 minutes, respectively. Among participants, 44 and 88% took iron in READ and DIRECT, respectively. Adverse effects were common but usually mild. READ failed to maintain iron stores in the population, but was effective in donors who consumed more than 75% of the recommended dose. DIRECT was effective in preventing declines in ferritin concentration. Trade-offs between cost, complexity, uptake, and effectiveness must be considered in the implementation of postdonation iron supplementation.

HIV Detection in a Blood Donor: Importance of Serological Screening

We report the case of a first time blood donor in which the presence of HIV antigen/antibody in absence of HIV ribonucleic acid was detected. The male donor was attendedin the Hemotherapy Unit of our institution in the City of Buenos Aires. During the pre-donation interview he didn’t mention any risky situation that could be a motive of deferral nor did he exclude himself after it. Given the laboratory’s results, we could find ourselves facing a person that could be receiving antiretroviral therapy for HIV or to the group of those infected by HIV named “elite controllers” whose immune system allows them to remain asymptomatic during long periods of time. We couldn´t corroborate these possibilities since he didn´t respond to our summons. Cases like this one confirm the importance of the use of serologic screening tests for the detection of antigens and antibodies as well as the detection of nucleic acids for HIV.

Seroprevalence of viral markers among blood donors at the Blood Donor Center of Mohammed V Military Teaching Hospital of Rabat, Morocco

Le but de ce travail était de déterminer la prévalence du virus de l’immunodéficience humaine (VIH), du virus de l’hépatite B (VHB) et C (VHC) sur les dons du sang collectés au Centre de transfusion sanguine(CTS) de l’hôpital militaire d’instruction Mohammed V entre 2010 et 2012. Etude rétrospective menée auprès des donneurs de sang militaires âgés de 18 à 50 ans avec prédominance masculine (95%). L’entretien médical pré-don constitue la première barrière de sélection des sujets à risque. Le dépistage biologique était réalisé par technique immuno-enzymatique en milieu liquide utilisant des anticorps et/ou des antigènes. L’ELISA (enzyme linked immuno-sorbent assay) combiné de quatrième génération pour VHC et VIH a été utilisé. La confirmation a été faite en réalisant la même technique en double au CTS et au laboratoire de virologie. Dans notre série de 25661 échantillons testés, la prévalence du VHB était 3,97‰ (n=102), celle de VHC était 2,45 ‰ (n=63), celle de VIH était 0,15 ‰ (n=4). Un seul cas de coïnfection (0,039 ‰) par le VHB et VHC a été noté, aucune association entre VIH-VHB, VIH-VHC ou VHB, VHC et VIH n’a été enregistrée. Les taux faibles de séroprévalence des marqueurs viraux de notre étude montrent l’amélioration des mesures préventives en ce qui concerne la sélection des donneurs et des tests de dépistage. Cette prévalence constatée incite à maintenir l’utilisation du réactif combiné qui est la seule alternative à la biologie moléculaire pour les pays en voie de développement.

Compliance with the current 12‐month deferral for male‐to‐male sex in Australia

In Australia since 2000, donors are deferred for 12 months since last male-to-male sexual contact. There is no estimate of the prevalence of non-compliance (i.e. failure to disclose a risk during the predonation interview which would lead to deferral) with the policy in Australia; however, published studies elsewhere indicate a range of 0·8-2.3% [corrected]. We investigated the rate of, timing and motivation for non-compliance. A nationally representative sample of donors who had made a recent donation negative for transfusion-transmissible infection testing was surveyed using an anonymous, online instrument. Non-compliance was considered as a 'yes' response to the current screening question. Non-compliers were requested to define the timing of the last sexual contact relevant to their most recent donation. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to define factors associated with non-compliance. Of 14 476 responses from male donors, 34 (0·23%, 95% CI: 0·16-0·33%) were non-compliant of whom 24 (0·17%, 95% CI: 0·11-0·25%) had contact within 6 months of donation. Factors significantly associated with non-compliance included: multiple sexual partners, history of injecting drug use, perception of a lack of privacy during interview and preference for a computer-based questionnaire. Our study confirms high compliance (>99·7%) to the 12-month deferral for male-to-male sex in Australia providing reassuring evidence for the efficacy of the screening question. Issues of 'privacy' and 'discomfort' associated with disclosure suggest the use of validated audio computer-assisted structured interview as a possible option for improving compliance with the donor questionnaire.

Prévention du risque bactérien : inactivation des pathogènes/détection des bactéries

Bacterial contamination of blood products remains the most important infectious risk of blood transfusion in 2013. Platelet concentrates (PC) are in cause in the majority of the transfusion reaction due to bacterial contaminations. A lot of prevention methods have been developed over the last 10years (pre-donation interview, skin decontamination, diversion of the first 30mL of the donation, leuko-reduction…), they have focused on limiting the contamination of the donations and prevent the bacterial growth in donations and/or in the blood products. These measures were effective and led to significantly reducing the risk of adverse effects associated with bacterial growth. However, every year there are about six accidents (with a high level of imputability) and one death. The reduction of the bacterial risk remains a priority for the French Blood Establishment (EFS). The procedure for skin disinfection is going to be improved in order to further strengthen this crucial step to avoid the contamination of donation. Methods of pathogen inactivation applied to plasma and PC are available in France and their effectiveness is demonstrated on the bacterial risk. Methods for bacterial detection of PC are used in many countries now. Automated culture is the most common. Alternatives are now available in the form of rapid tests able to analyze the PC just before the delivery and avoid false negatives observed with automated culture. Assessments are under way to confirm these benefits in 2013.

Undisclosed human immunodeficiency virus risk factors identified through a computer‐based questionnaire program among blood donors in Brazil

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk factor screening among blood donors remains a cornerstone for the safety of blood supply and is dependent on prospective donor self-disclosure and an attentive predonation interview. Audio computer-assisted structured interview (ACASI) has been shown to increase self-reporting of risk behaviors. This cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2009 and March 2011 at four Brazilian blood centers to identify the population of HIV-negative eligible blood donors that answered face-to-face interviews without disclosing risks, but subsequently disclosed deferrable risk factors by ACASI. Compared to the donor interview, the ACASI contained expanded content on demographics, sexual behavior, and other HIV risk factors questions. A total of 901 HIV-negative blood donors were interviewed. On the ACASI, 13% of donors (n = 120) declared a risk factor that would have resulted in deferral that was not disclosed during the face-to-face assessment. The main risk factors identified were recent unprotected sex with an unknown or irregular partner (49 donors), sex with a person with exposure to blood or fluids (26 donors), multiple sexual partners (19 donors), and male-male sexual behavior (10 donors). Independent factors associated with the disclosure of any risk factor for HIV were age (≥40 years vs. 18-25 years; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.88) and blood center (Hemope vs. Hemominas; AOR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.42-4.44). ACASI elicited increased disclosure of HIV risk factors among blood donors. ACASI may be a valuable modality of interview to be introduced in Brazilian blood banks.

Entretien prédon par un personnel paramédical formé et habilité : faisabilité, fiabilité et sécurité

Predonation interview accounts for a major step in transfusion safety. In France, it must be performed by a physician, following a methodical questioning and a standardized questionnaire. Faced with this evolution, the value of a strictly medical expertise has been progressively losing importance. In many countries, blood donor selection is being organized by non medical trained staff (Québec, Switzerland, e.g.). A decree of April 30, 2006 allowed the Établissement français du sang to experiment a predonation interview by an authorized paramedical staff in the form of a two-phase prospective multicenter study over a year. Phase I "experimental situation": six physician/nurse teams among three blood transfusion centres interviewed 1940 blood-donation candidates, including 253 new donors (13% out of total). Phase 2 "observational study": 3222 blood-donation candidates were interviewed either by a physician or a nurse. In phase I, nurses were able to make a decision without the physician's help in 1921 cases. A total of 1628 candidates were decided capable of donating blood both by physicians and nurses, 174 donors were rejected both by physicians and nurses and 69 were rejected either by physicians or nurses. In phase 2, out of 3222 blood-donation candidates, an average of 12.1% were rejected by nurses and 10% by physicians. The study reported a weaker variability among nurses. Results show that nurses were able to perform predonation interviews with high reliability, without additional risk. The reproducibility of their answers in the field of recipient-risk evaluation was better than the physicians.

Seroprevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in at‐risk blood donors in Catalonia (Spain)

The increasing arrival of Latin Americans to Europe and, particularly, to Spain has led to the appearance of new pathologies, such as Chagas disease, a zoonotic infection endemic to rural areas of Central and South America. In the absence of the triatomid vector, one of the main modes of transmission of Chagas disease in nonendemic regions is through blood transfusion. The Catalonian Blood Bank has implemented a screening program for Chagas disease in at-risk blood donors and has performed a study to determine the seroprevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in the donor population. The two commercial tests used in all samples were the ID-PaGIA Chagas antibody test (DiaMed) and the bioelisa Chagas assay (Biokit). Overall seroprevalence was 0.62 percent, with 11 donors confirmed positive among the 1770 at-risk donors studied; the highest rate (10.2%) was in Bolivian donors. Interestingly, 1 of the 11 positive donors was a Spaniard who had resided various years in a Chagas disease endemic area. Furthermore, 1 of the positive donors presented detectable parasitemia. The results of this study emphasize the need for T. cruzi screening in at-risk blood donors in nonendemic countries. An important finding is the relevance of including in the at-risk category persons who have resided in, but were not necessarily born in, an endemic region. If T. cruzi screening is not routinely performed in all donations, it remains highly dependent on proper identification of at-risk donors during the predonation interview.

Human immunodeficiency virus‐1 infection correlates strongly with herpes simplex virus‐2 (genital herpes) seropositivity in South African and United States blood donations

In South Africa, human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) infection correlates with herpes simplex virus-2 (HSV-2; genital herpes) seropositivity in genitourinary disease clinic attendees. HSV-2 infection may be a marker for risk behavior and/or directly facilitate HIV-1 transmission. The rate of HSV-2 infection in HIV-infected South African and US blood donations was assessed, and whether the infections were correlated in donors screened and found negative for high-risk behavior by predonation interview was questioned. A total of 625 South African and 393 US HIV-1-infected repository samples previously characterized for longstanding or recent HIV-1 infection were tested with two commercially available HSV-2-specific assays. The prevalence of HSV-2 antibodies in South Africa was further assessed in 106 HIV-1-infected and 106 HIV-1-negative donors matched for sex, race, and donation history, as well as 200 random HIV-1-negative donors. A total of 52.2 percent of US and 69.3 percent of South African HIV-1-infected donations were HSV-2-seropositive. Age, race, and sex were independent risk factors for HSV-2 antibody prevalence in HIV-1-infected South African donors, who were more likely to be HSV-2 antibody-reactive than random HIV-1-negative donors (72.6% vs. 8.5%: odds ratio [OR], 28.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14.5-55) or matched donors (71.6% vs. 19.6%: OR, 10.3; 95% CI, 5.4-19.8). HIV-1 infection and HSV-2 seropositivity correlated in white and black populations when analyzed by age group. HIV-1 infection correlates strongly with HSV-2 seropositivity in US and South African blood donors. Our data describe the characteristics of HSV-2 antibody testing as a surrogate marker for HIV-1 infection and support a facilitating role for HSV-2 infection in HIV-1 transmission.

Sécurité transfusionnelle : paludisme et don de sang en Afrique

Malaria is a principal cause of mortality in Africa and represents a major blood-borne disease. The studies made on the continent show that transfusion-associated malaria is highly prevalent in blood donors groups and that some risk factors and clinical manifestations are frequently observed. The disease is mostly asymptomatic and the signs are mild, which reduces significantly an efficient selection of the blood donors during the predonation interview and a secure supply of blood products. Furthermore, the lack of appropriate screening assays of the malaria in blood banks on the continent limit the diagnosis of the disease and hamper the blood safety. However, the prevention of transfusion-associated malaria is a frequently asked question. The destruction of the parasite in the blood bag and the recipient anti-malarial prophylaxis are the described possibilities, added to local programs against the vectors of the disease.

Comparative assessment of pre- and post-donation attitudes towards potential oocyte and embryo disposition and management among ovum donors in an oocyte donation programme

In anonymous oocyte donation programmes, the disposition of retrieved oocytes and subsequent embryo management are at the discretion of the IVF programme and the oocyte recipients, as donors waive all rights following their donation. Nonetheless, donors are routinely made aware of ways in which oocytes and resulting embryos may be used and elect to proceed with the process even in the presence of reservations to some clinical scenarios before their donation. The aim of our study was to examine oocyte donors' attitudes to oocyte and embryo disposition and management and how initial reservations change over the course of the donation process. Oocyte donors in a university-based IVF programme were asked about their willingness to donate in relation to various clinical scenarios during the initial screening interview and at the post-donation exit interview. Results were tabulated as 'yes' or 'no'. At the pre-donation interview, 72% of donor candidates expressed reservations to one or more clinical scenarios. More reservations were expressed at the post-donation interview compared with the pre-donation interview. The greatest reservations were donating to recipients >50 years of age (P < 0.05). Despite this, 97% of donors were willing to donate again. Oocyte donors' attitudes towards various clinical scenarios changed following their donation, reflecting overall greater reservations following the donation process. Although speculative, donors may be more willing to assert their opinions or donor attitudes become more restrictive.

Prevalence of selected viral infections among temporarily deferred donors who returned to donate blood: American Red Cross blood donor study

Health history questions are introduced into the predonation interview to identify blood donors believed to pose a higher risk of infectious diseases to recipients. This study assesses the current impact of some of those questions. Donor deferral and donation data were extracted from a research database of the American Red Cross. The prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen or antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, or human T-lymphotropic virus was obtained for different groups of donors who were temporarily deferred in 2000 through 2001 and later returned to donate blood in 2000 through 2003. The results were compared with either first-time or repeat donors in 2000 through 2003, while controlling for differences in sex, age, and year of donation. Of donors temporarily deferred in 2000 through 2001 who had had no donation or deferral during the previous 2 years, only 22.08 percent subsequently returned to donate blood in 2000 through 2003. Donations from returning donors who had been deferred for potential infectious disease risk did not show a higher prevalence for any of the viral markers when those with no donation or deferral during the previous two years were compared with first-time donations, and those with prior donation were compared with repeat donations. Blood donors temporarily deferred in 2000 through 2001 for potential risk of viral infection who later returned to donate blood did not appear to pose a higher risk compared to first-time or repeat donors. The effectiveness of some of the currently used deferral questions in reducing viral risks warrants further study.

Impacto da recusa de candidatos à doação de sangue devido aos critérios para prevenção da doença de Creutzfeldt-Jacob e sua variante

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) and its variant (vCJD) are degenerative and fatal neurological diseases with a long incubation period. Recent studies have described a potential association between vCJD and blood transmission. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the deferral criteria for CJD and vCJD in our institution since their implementation in 2001. Based on scientific data, we have adopted deferral criteria for the prevention of CJD and vCJD through blood transfusion since 2001. Blood donors are deferred if they spent more than 6 months cumulatively in the United Kingdom from January 1, 1980 through December 31, 1996, 10 years cumulatively in France, Portugal, or the Irish Republic since 1980, received human pituitary-derived growth hormone or corneal transplants or had one or more blood relatives with familial CJD. The deferral rate concerning these criteria was retrospectively evaluated for all blood donation candidates from January 2001 to December 2004. A total of 1,015,587 pre-donation interviews were evaluated. The deferral rate for CJD and vCJD was 0.049% in 2001, 0.051% in 2002, 0.092% in 2003 and 0.098% in 2004, denoting a permanent deferral of 726 (0.068%) blood donors. The most frequent deferral reasons for CJD and vCJD was spending more than 6 months cumulatively in the United Kingdom from 1980 to 1996 (0.025%) followed by corneal transplants (0.019%) and use of pituitary-derived human growth hormone (0.014%). The number of deferrals related to CJD and its variant was very low at our center. It is feasible to support the Precautionary Principle for CJD and vCJD at our center without jeopardizing blood supply.

Le risque de paludisme transfusionnel confronté à celui de la mutité biologique : deux données irréconciliables ?

Despite the relatively high frequency of imported malaria in metropolitan France, the transmission of malaria by transfusion is exceptional. The screening of donations to determine those at risk is performed by an interview, and by the testing of serology for defined groups of donors. However, the exclusion of a candidate ‘at risk’ as a blood donor, by a pre-donation interview, is not completely mastered and the discrimination by biological examination lacks sensitivity, as much for methodological reasons as for reasons linked to the complex parasitic pathogenic agent ( Plasmodium ssp.), as for the specific host defence system. The risk of introducing an unsafe—potentially dangerous (transfusion–transmitted malaria is often lethal)—element into the transfusional circuit is not completely covered. Is serology testing the most adequate test to avoid the risk of infected donations, in particular by Plasmodium falciparum; what are the alternatives and what will be the eventual added-costs of the biological qualification of such donations? The transfusional risk linked to Plasmodium seems, however, to be reduced to a minimum, concerning the circulation of plasma, which could represent an alternative for donors at real risk (rare) and those with a supposed risk (relatively numerous).

Comprendre le don : l’apport des sciences humaines à l’activité de prélèvement

In France, the necessity of managing sanitary risks associated with blood transfusion has induced a strong medicalization of blood collection. Practicing this activity of transfusion medicine confronts the professional with problems which the medical science is not sufficient to answer: curbs and motivations for donating, seasonal and geographic fluctuations in blood collection, sense of pre-donation interview, individual or collective contestings of guidelines for blood collection... From recent sociological works on donation in France, especially on blood donation, this paper suggests reporting the complexity of blood donation thought process and the necessity to refer to human and social sciences to approach it in a best way. Understanding the gift should help professionals to communicate not only on the promotion of blood donation, but also on the risk and its management.

Peut-on hiérarchiser les contre-indications au don du sang ?

Because it symbolizes henceforth the sanitary risk and fears which are linked to it, the blood transfusion must master the potential or real risks associated to its practice. The analysis of these risks leads to confirm the initial selection phase of candidates for blood donation as an always original stage of the blood transfusion safety towards the identified infectious risks, but also mainly towards the emergent or modelled risks. The evaluation of the current system of prevention leads to consider two potential dangers: the ineffectiveness of the selection because of the lack of meaning given to this stage, and the donors' disaffection caused by badly accepted or badly justified deferrals. The deficit of meaning can be due to an insufficient information of the population as for the policy of collective prevention of transfusion-transmitted infectious diseases. It can be worsened by the construction of the pre-donation interview which can appear as a succession of questions without visible links. This paper suggests risk analysis to blood transfusion, and a reflection to improve this important stage of blood product safety approach represente by the selection of candidates to a blood donation.