s S227 was classified into a high RDW group and others were classified into a control group. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk scores, angiographic characteristics, inhospital percutaneous or surgical revascularization, as well as 30-days major adverse cardiac event (MACE) including death, recurrent myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and lethal ventricular arrhythmias were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Among 340 patients, 31 patients (9.1%) were classified into the high RDW group and 309 patients (90.9%) were classified into the control group. Mean RDW was 18.3 2.6% in the high RDW group and 13.8 0.9% in the control group. Patients with high RDW were more likely to have hypertension (93.5% vs. 73.1%, p1⁄40.01), chronic kidney disease (51.6% vs. 30.4%, p1⁄40.02) and anemia (11.3 1.6 g/dl vs. 13.2 1.7g/dl, p<0.001). Patients with high RDW had higher TIMI risk scores (4.2 1.2 vs. 3.6 1.5, p1⁄40.017) compared to the control group. Patients with high RDW had a higher rate of 30-days MACE (12.9% vs. 2.9%, p1⁄40.001) compared to the control group, and this association remained significant after adjusting for the baseline hemoglobin levels (odds ratio 2.878; 95% confidence interval 1.66 to 24.1; p1⁄40.004). There was no significant difference in peak troponin values, the rates of inhospital revascularization, pre-procedural impaired coronary flow, and the existence of coronary thrombus between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with NSTEMI, high RDW defined as greater than 1SD was significantly associated with a higher TIMI risk score and a higher rate of 30-days MACE. After adjusting for the baseline hemoglobin levels, high RDW remained significantly associated with a higher rate of 30-days MACE. 337 THE ABC TRIAL DOES ALL-BLOOD CARDIOPLEGIA PREVENT BLOOD TRANSFUSION IN CARDIAC SURGERY? A SINGLE CENTER PILOT STUDY C Deshaies, RD Stanzel, KJ Buth, AB Fagan, GM Hirsch, SB O’Blenes Halifax, Nova Scotia BACKGROUND: All-blood cardioplegia (ABC) has emerged as an alternative to standard 4:1 diluted blood cardioplegia (DBC) due to its theoretical advantages of limiting hemodilution, blood transfusion, and myocardial edema. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double blind pilot study to determine feasibility and sample size for a multicenter trial comparing both strategies. Patients were eligible if undergoing CABG, aortic, mitral or combined surgery. Exclusion criteria included pre-op mechanical support, endocarditis, previous cardiac surgery, and recent irreversible anticoagulation. Retrograde autologous priming was used in all cases. Strict transfusion criteria were followed during hospital admission. RESULTS: Of 650 cases performed at our centre between February and September 2013, 246 patients were screened and 36 of them (15%) were eligible, consented, and randomized (ABC n1⁄418; DBC n1⁄418). Comorbidities, procedure types, and cross-clamp time, were similar in each group (table 1). There was no mortality. The total volume of cardioplegia delivered in each group was similar but the amount of crystalloid in the cardioplegia was significantly less in the ABC group (73 vs. 516 mL; p < .0001) (figure 1). Nonetheless, crystalloid in the cardioplegia represented only 1% (ABC) vs. 8% (DBC; p < .0001) of the total intraoperative crystalloid administration, and 0.7% (ABC) vs. 5% (DBC; p < .0001) of the fluid received in the first 24 hours of care. Four ABC and 2 DBC patients were transfused a total of 6.75 and 5 pRBC units. There was 100% adherence to our transfusion protocol. One subject in the ABC group, who was initially transfused during his admission, also received an additional unit in a peripheral center after discharge. The drop in hemoglobin from pre-op to lowest value (g/L: 51 vs. 49; p 1⁄4 0.60), the incidence of low cardiac output (%: 16 vs. 22; p 1⁄4 0.99) and markers of myocardial injury (16-hr Tn-T: 227 vs. 327; p 1⁄4 0.08) were similar in each group. Based on the DBC transfusion rate of 11% and a power of 80%, 898 to 2892 patients per arm would be required to show a relative risk reduction between 20 and 35%. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the feasibility of our design. However, over 1000 subjects per group will be required to detect a clinically significant reduction in transfusion. Modification of inclusion criteria, targeting patients at high risk of transfusion, would likely reduce the necessary sample size but would negatively impact recruitment rate and generalizability of the results. S228 Canadian Journal of Cardiology Volume 3
Read full abstract