ABSTRACT Non-union collective agreements are central to the architecture of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act). This legislative architecture has facilitated the practice of employers creating single-enterprise agreements with their employees with no negotiation or bargaining and no involvement of unions, and in circumstances where employees have been denied the benefit of receiving safety net modern award pay and conditions, sometimes for decades. The paper explores the impact on the creation of non-union agreements of recent legislative amendments to the FW Act. The paper argues that the amendments were designed to expand the coverage of collective agreements by seeking to overcome problems with the operation of collective agreement-making and introducing new forms of multi-employer agreement-making, in which unions play a more central role. Unions have been active in using the legislative amendments in a number of respects. However, despite some positive outcomes, the lack of changes to the underpinning architecture of the Act means that employers are still able to avoid unions and use non-union agreements to undermine the terms and conditions negotiated in union agreements and set out in minimum standards. These problems will continue until the FW Act is changed in more fundamental ways.
Read full abstract