ABSTRACT Employing the social aspect into the blue economy is crucial to ensure equity for communities whose livelihoods are intertwined with the ocean. One way to achieve this is by integrating local knowledge into management practices. Unfortunately, information regarding the mechanisms that influence the effectiveness of this integration remains underexplored, particularly in terms of empirical field-based evidence.. This research adopts a qualitative approach that emphasizes the exploration of case studies on the integration of local knowledge through institutional bricolage. Papadak/Hoholok is one example of this practice. We argue that institutional bricolage practices emerging from external parties are determined by the functioning of change enablers and the appropriate implementation of co-management. The research findings indicate that local knowledge struggles to function effectively due to a lack of resources and commitment from the involved parties. External parties seem more interested in the initiation process rather than collaborating over the long term to ensure the successful integration of local knowledge into management practices. Hence, the long-term commitment of involved parties should be a focal point for similar practices in the upcoming times.