Power Of Genome-wide Association Studies Research Articles

Powerful mapping of cis-genetic effects on gene expression across diverse populations reveals novel disease-critical genes.

While disease-associated variants identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) most likely regulate gene expression levels, linking variants to target genes is critical to determining the functional mechanisms of these variants. Genetic effects on gene expression have been extensively characterized by expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) studies, yet data from non-European populations is limited. This restricts our understanding of disease to genes whose regulatory variants are common in European populations. While previous work has leveraged data from multiple populations to improve GWAS power and polygenic risk score (PRS) accuracy, multi-ancestry data has not yet been used to better estimate cis-genetic effects on gene expression. Here, we present a new method, Multi-Ancestry Gene Expression Prediction Regularized Optimization (MAGEPRO), which constructs robust genetic models of gene expression in understudied populations or cell types by fitting a regularized linear combination of eQTL summary data across diverse cohorts. In simulations, our tool generates more accurate models of gene expression than widely-used LASSO and the state-of-the-art multi-ancestry PRS method, PRS-CSx, adapted to gene expression prediction. We attribute this improvement to MAGEPRO's ability to more accurately estimate causal eQTL effect sizes (p < 3.98 × 10-4, two-sided paired t-test). With real data, we applied MAGEPRO to 8 eQTL cohorts representing 3 ancestries (average n = 355) and consistently outperformed each of 6 competing methods in gene expression prediction tasks. Integration with GWAS summary statistics across 66 complex traits (representing 22 phenotypes and 3 ancestries) resulted in 2,331 new gene-trait associations, many of which replicate across multiple ancestries, including PHTF1 linked to white blood cell count, a gene which is overexpressed in leukemia patients. MAGEPRO also identified biologically plausible novel findings, such as PIGB, an essential component of GPI biosynthesis, associated with heart failure, which has been previously evidenced by clinical outcome data. Overall, MAGEPRO is a powerful tool to enhance inference of gene regulatory effects in underpowered datasets and has improved our understanding of population-specific and shared genetic effects on complex traits.

Imputation strategies for low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data and their effects on genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies in pigs

The uncertainty resulting from missing genotypes in low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (LCWGS) data complicates genotype imputation. The aim of this study is to find out an optimal strategy for accurately imputing LCWGS data and assess its effectiveness for genomic prediction (GP) and genome-wide association study (GWAS) on economically important traits of Large White pigs. The LCWGS data of 1 423 Large White pigs were imputed using three different strategies: (1) using the high-coverage whole-genome sequencing (HCWGS) of 30 key progenitors as the reference panel (Ref_LG); (2) mixing HCWGS of key progenitors with LCWGS (Mix_HLG) and (3) self-imputation in LCWGS (Within_LG). Additionally, to compare the imputation effects of LCWGS, we also imputed SNP chip data of 1 423 Large White pigs to the whole-genome sequencing level using the reference panel consisting of key progenitors (Ref_SNP). To evaluate effects of the imputed sequencing data, we compared the accuracies of GP and statistical power of GWAS for four reproductive traits based on the chip data, sequencing data imputed from chip data and LCWGS data using an optimal strategy. The average imputation accuracies of the Within_LG, Ref_LG and Mix_HLG were 0.9893, 0.9899 and 0.9875, respectively, which were higher than that of the Ref_SNP (0.8522). Using the imputed sequencing data from LCWGS with the Ref_LG imputation strategy, the accuracies of GP for four traits improved by approximately 0.31–1.04% compared to the chip data, and by 0.7–1.05% compared to the imputed sequencing data from chip data. Furthermore, by using the sequence data imputed from LCWGS with the Ref_LG, 18 candidate genes were identified to be associated with the four reproductive traits of interest in Large White pigs: total number of piglets born - EPC2, MBD5, ORC4 and ACVR2A; number of piglets born healthy - IKBKE; total litter weight of piglets born alive - HSPA13 and CPA1; gestation length - GTF2H5, ITGAV, NFE2L2, CALCRL, ITGA4, STAT1, HOXD10, MSTN, COL5A2 and STAT4. With the exception of EPC2, ORC4, ACVR2A and MSTN, others represent novel candidates. Our findings can provide a reference for the application of LCWGS data in livestock and poultry.

Exploring the genetic architecture of brain structure and ADHD using polygenic neuroimaging-derived scores.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have provided valuable insights into the genetic basis of neuropsychiatric disorders and highlighted their complexity. Careful consideration of the polygenicity and complex genetic architecture could aid in the understanding of the underlying brain mechanisms. We introduce an innovative approach to polygenic scoring, utilizing imaging-derived phenotypes (IDPs) to predict a clinical phenotype. We leveraged IDP GWAS data from the UK Biobank, to create polygenic imaging-derived scores (PIDSs). As a proof-of-concept, we assessed genetic variations in brain structure between individuals with ADHD and unaffected controls across three NeuroIMAGE waves (n = 954). Out of the 94 PIDS, 72 exhibited significant associations with their corresponding IDPs in an independent sample. Notably, several global measures, including cerebellum white matter, cerebellum cortex, and cerebral white matter, displayed substantial variance explained for their respective IDPs, ranging from 3% to 5.7%. Conversely, the associations between each IDP and the clinical ADHD phenotype were relatively weak. These findings highlight the growing power of GWAS in structural neuroimaging traits, enabling the construction of polygenic scores that accurately reflect the underlying polygenic architecture. However, to establish robust connections between PIDS and behavioral or clinical traits such as ADHD, larger samples are needed. Our novel approach to polygenic risk scoring offers a valuable tool for researchers in the field of psychiatric genetics.

Genomic prediction and genome-wide association study using combined genotypic data from different genotyping systems: application to apple fruit quality traits.

With advances in next-generation sequencing technologies, various marker genotyping systems have been developed for genomics-based approaches such as genomic selection (GS) and genome-wide association study (GWAS). As new genotyping platforms are developed, data from different genotyping platforms must be combined. However, the potential use of combined data for GS and GWAS has not yet been clarified. In this study, the accuracy of genomic prediction (GP) and the detection power of GWAS increased for most fruit quality traits of apples when using combined data from different genotyping systems, Illumina Infinium single-nucleotide polymorphism array and genotyping by random amplicon sequencing-direct (GRAS-Di) systems. In addition, the GP model, which considered the inbreeding effect, further improved the accuracy of the seven fruit traits. Runs of homozygosity (ROH) islands overlapped with the significantly associated regions detected by the GWAS for several fruit traits. Breeders may have exploited these regions to select promising apples by breeders, increasing homozygosity. These results suggest that combining genotypic data from different genotyping platforms benefits the GS and GWAS of fruit quality traits in apples. Information on inbreeding could be beneficial for improving the accuracy of GS for fruit traits of apples; however, further analysis is required to elucidate the relationship between the fruit traits and inbreeding depression (e.g. decreased vigor).

Using Alternative Definitions of Controls to Increase Statistical Power in GWAS.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are often underpowered due to small effect sizes of common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on phenotypes and extreme multiple testing thresholds. The most common approach for increasing statistical power is to increase sample size. We propose an alternative strategy of redefining case-control outcomes into ordinal case-subthreshold-asymptomatic variables. While maintaining the clinical case threshold, we subdivide controls into two groups: individuals who are symptomatic but do not meet the clinical criteria for diagnosis (subthreshold) and individuals who are effectively asymptomatic. We conducted a simulation study to examine the impact of effect size, minor allele frequency, population prevalence, and the prevalence of the subthreshold group on statistical power to detect genetic associations in three scenarios: a standard case-control, an ordinal, and a case-asymptomatic control analysis. Our results suggest the ordinal model consistently provides the greatest statistical power while the case-control model the least. Power in the case-asymptomatic control model reflects the case-control or ordinal model depending on the population prevalence and size of the subthreshold category. We then analyzed a major depression phenotype from the UK Biobank to corroborate our simulation results. Overall, the ordinal model improves statistical power in GWAS consistent with increasing the sample size by approximately 10%.

Synthetic surrogates improve power for genome-wide association studies of partially missing phenotypes in population biobanks.

Within population biobanks, incomplete measurement of certain traits limits the power for genetic discovery. Machine learning is increasingly used to impute the missing values from the available data. However, performing genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on imputed traits can introduce spurious associations, identifying genetic variants that are not associated with the original trait. Here we introduce a new method, synthetic surrogate (SynSurr) analysis, which makes GWAS on imputed phenotypes robust to imputation errors. Rather than replacing missing values, SynSurr jointly analyzes the original and imputed traits. We show that SynSurr estimates the same genetic effect as standard GWAS and improves power in proportion to the quality of the imputations. SynSurr requires a commonly made missing-at-random assumption but relaxes the requirements of existing imputation methods by not requiring correct model specification. We present extensive simulations and ablation analyses to validate SynSurr and apply it to empower the GWAS of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry traits within the UK Biobank.

Data Harmonization Guidelines to Combine Multi-platform Genomic Data from Admixed Populations and Boost Power in Genome-Wide Association Studies.

Data harmonization involves combining data from multiple independent sources and processing the data to produce one uniform dataset. Merging separate genotypes or whole-genome sequencing datasets has been proposed as a strategy to increase the statistical power of association tests by increasing the effective sample size. However, data harmonization is not a widely adopted strategy due to the difficulties with merging data (including confounding produced by batch effects and population stratification). Detailed data harmonization protocols are scarce and are often conflicting. Moreover, data harmonization protocols that accommodate samples of admixed ancestry are practically non-existent. Existing data harmonization procedures must be modified to ensure the heterogeneous ancestry of admixed individuals is incorporated into additional downstream analyses without confounding results. Here, we propose a set of guidelines for merging multi-platform genetic data from admixed samples that can be adopted by any investigator with elementary bioinformatics experience. We have applied these guidelines to aggregate 1544 tuberculosis (TB) case-control samples from six separate in-house datasets and conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of TB susceptibility. The GWAS performed on the merged dataset had improved power over analyzing the datasets individually and produced summary statistics free from bias introduced by batch effects and population stratification. © 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Processing separate datasets comprising array genotype data Alternate Protocol 1: Processing separate datasets comprising array genotype and whole-genome sequencing data Alternate Protocol 2: Performing imputation using a local reference panel Basic Protocol 2: Merging separate datasets Basic Protocol 3: Ancestry inference using ADMIXTURE and RFMix Basic Protocol 4: Batch effect correction using pseudo-case-control comparisons.

GWAS advancements to investigate disease associations and biological mechanisms.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been instrumental in elucidating the genetic architecture of various traits and diseases. Despite the success of GWAS, inherent limitations such as identifying rare and ultra-rare variants, the potential for spurious associations, and in pinpointing causative agents can undermine diagnostic capabilities. This review provides an overview of GWAS and highlights recent advances in genetics that employ a range of methodologies, including Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS), Mendelian Randomization (MR), the Pangenome's high-quality T2T-CHM13 panel, and the Human BioMolecular Atlas Program (HuBMAP), as potential enablers of current and future GWAS research. State of the literature demonstrate the capabilities of these techniques in enhancing the statistical power of GWAS. WGS, with its comprehensive approach, captures the entire genome, surpassing the capabilities of the traditional GWAS technique focused on predefined Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) sites. The Pangenome's T2T-CHM13 panel, with its holistic approach, aids in the analysis of regions with high sequence identity, such as segmental duplications (SDs). Mendelian Randomization has advanced causative inference, improving clinical diagnostics and facilitating definitive conclusions. Furthermore, spatial biology techniques like HuBMAP, enable 3D molecular mapping of tissues at single-cell resolution, offering insights into pathology of complex traits. This study aims to elucidate and advocate for the increased application of these technologies, highlighting their potential to shape the future of GWAS research.

Heritability of complex traits in sub-populations experiencing bottlenecks and growth

Populations that have experienced a bottleneck are regularly used in Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) to investigate variants associated with complex traits. It is generally understood that these isolated sub-populations may experience high frequency of otherwise rare variants with large effect size, and therefore provide a unique opportunity to study said trait. However, the demographic history of the population under investigation affects all SNPs that determine the complex trait genome-wide, changing its heritability and genetic architecture. We use a simulation based approach to identify the impact of the demographic processes of drift, expansion, and migration on the heritability of complex trait. We show that demography has considerable impact on complex traits. We then investigate the power to resolve heritability of complex traits in GWAS studies subjected to demographic effects. We find that demography is an important component for interpreting inference of complex traits and has a nuanced impact on the power of GWAS. We conclude that demographic histories need to be explicitly modelled to properly quantify the history of selection on a complex trait.

The effects of case/control ratio and sample size on genome-wide association studies: A simulation study.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is a useful tool for the detection of disease or quantitative trait-related genetic variations in the veterinary field. For a binary trait, a case/control experiment is designed in GWAS. However, there is limited information on the optimal case/control and sample size in GWAS. In this study, it was aimed to detect the effects of case/control ratio and sample size for GWAS using computer simulation under certain assumptions. Using the PLINK software, we simulated three different disease scenarios. In scenario 1, we simulated 10 different case/control ratios with increasing ratio of cases to controls. In scenario 2, we did versa of scenario 1 with the increasing ratio of controls to cases. In scenarios 1 and 2, sample size gradually was increased with the change case/control ratios. In scenario 3, the total sample size was fixed to 2000 to see real effects of case/control ratio on the number of disease-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The results showed that the number of disease-related SNPs were the highest when the case/control ratio is close to 1:1 in scenarios 1 and 2 and did not change with an increase in sample size. Similarly, the number of disease-related SNPs was the highest in case/control ratios 1:1 in scenario 3. However, unbalanced case/control ratio caused the detection of lower number of disease-related SNPs in scenario 3. The estimated average power of SNPs was highest when case/control ratio is 1:1 in all scenarios. All findings led to the conclusion that an increase in sample size may enhance the statistical power of GWAS when the number of cases is small. In addition, case/control ratio 1:1 may be the optimal ratio for GWAS. These findings may be valuable not only for veterinary field but also for human clinical experiments.

Are trait-associated genes clustered together in a gene network?

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have provided an abundance of information about the genetic variants and their loci that are associated to complex traits and diseases. However, due to linkage disequilibrium (LD)and noncoding regions of loci, it remains a challenge to pinpoint the causal genes. Gene network-based approaches, paired with network diffusion methods, have been proposed to prioritize causal genes and to boost statistical power in GWAS based on the assumption that trait-associated genes are clustered in a gene network. Due to the difficulty in mapping trait-associated variants to genes in GWAS, this assumption has never been directly or rigorously tested empirically. On the other hand, whole exome sequencing (WES)data focuses on the protein-coding regions, directly identifying trait-associated genes. In this study, we tested the assumption by leveraging the recently available exome-based association statistics from the UK Biobank WES data along with two types of networks. We found that almost all trait-associated genes were significantly more proximal to each other than randomly selected genes within both networks. These results support the assumption that trait-associated genes are clustered in gene networks, which can be further leveraged to boost the power of GWAS such as by introducing less stringent p value thresholds.

Identification of Novel QTL for Mercury Accumulation in Maize Using an Enlarged SNP Panel.

Mercury (Hg) pollution not only poses a threat to the environment but also adversely affects the growth and development of plants, with potential repercussions for animals and humans through bioaccumulation in the food chain. Maize, a crucial source of food, industrial materials, and livestock feed, requires special attention in understanding the genetic factors influencing mercury accumulation. Developing maize varieties with low mercury accumulation is vital for both maize production and human health. In this study, a comprehensive genome-wide association study (GWAS) was conducted using an enlarged SNP panel comprising 1.25 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 230 maize inbred lines across three environments. The analysis identified 111 significant SNPs within 78 quantitative trait loci (QTL), involving 169 candidate genes under the Q model. Compared to the previous study, the increased marker density and optimized statistical model led to the discovery of 74 additional QTL, demonstrating improved statistical power. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis revealed that most genes participate in arsenate reduction and stress responses. Notably, GRMZM2G440968, which has been reported in previous studies, is associated with the significant SNP chr6.S_155668107 in axis tissue. It encodes a cysteine proteinase inhibitor, implying its potential role in mitigating mercury toxicity by inhibiting cysteine. Haplotype analyses provided further insights, indicating that lines carrying hap3 exhibited the lowest mercury content compared to other haplotypes. In summary, our study significantly enhances the statistical power of GWAS, identifying additional genes related to mercury accumulation and metabolism. These findings offer valuable insights into unraveling the genetic basis of mercury content in maize and contribute to the development of maize varieties with low mercury accumulation.

Genotype imputation methods for whole and complex genomic regions utilizing deep learning technology.

The imputation of unmeasured genotypes is essential in human genetic research, particularly in enhancing the power of genome-wide association studies and conducting subsequent fine-mapping. Recently, several deep learning-based genotype imputation methods for genome-wide variants with the capability of learning complex linkage disequilibrium patterns have been developed. Additionally, deep learning-based imputation has been applied to a distinct genomic region known as the major histocompatibility complex, referred to as HLA imputation. Despite their various advantages, the current deep learning-based genotype imputation methods do have certain limitations and have not yet become standard. These limitations include the modest accuracy improvement over statistical and conventional machine learning-based methods. However, their benefits include other aspects, such as their "reference-free" nature, which ensures complete privacy protection, and their higher computational efficiency. Furthermore, the continuing evolution of deep learning technologies is expected to contribute to further improvements in prediction accuracy and usability in the future.

Evaluating three strategies of genome-wide association analysis for integrating data from multiple populations.

In livestock, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are usually conducted in a single population (single-GWAS) with limited sample size and detection power. To enhance the detection power of GWAS, meta-analysis of GWAS (meta-GWAS) and mega-analysis of GWAS (mega-GWAS) have been proposed to integrate data from multiple populations at the level of summary statistics or individual data, respectively. However, there is a lack of comparison for these different strategies, which makes it difficult to guide the best practice of GWAS integrating data from multiple study populations. To maximize the comparison of different association analysis strategies across multiple populations, we conducted single-GWAS, meta-GWAS, and mega-GWAS for the backfat thickness of 100 kg (BFT_100) and days to 100 kg (DAYS_100) within each of the three commercial pig breeds (Duroc, Yorkshire, and Landrace). Based on controlling the genome inflation factor to one, we calculated corrected p-values (pC ). In Yorkshire, with the largest sample size, mega-GWAS, meta-GWAS and single-GWAS detected 149, 38 and 20 significant SNPs (pC < 1E-5) associated with BFT_100, as well as 26, four, and one QTL, respectively. Among them, pC of SNPs from mega-GWAS was the lowest, followed by meta-GWAS and single-GWAS. The correlation of pC among the three GWAS strategies ranged from 0.60 to 0.75 and the correlation of SNP effect values between meta-GWAS and mega-GWAS was 0.74, all showing good agreement. Collectively, even though there are differences in the integration of individual data or summary statistics, integrating data from multiple populations is an effective means of genetic argument for complex traits, especially mega-GWAS versus single-GWAS.

The osteoporosis susceptibility SNP rs188303909 at 2q14.2 regulates EN1 expression by modulating DNA methylation and E2F6 binding.

EN1 encodes a homeodomain-containing transcription factor and is a determinant of bone density and fracture. Previous powerful genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) near EN1 at 2q14.2 locus for osteoporosis, but the causal SNPs and functional mechanisms underlying these associations are poorly understood. The target genes regulated by the transcription factor EN1 are also unclear. In this study, we identified rs188303909, a functional CpG-SNP, as a causal SNP for osteoporosis at 2q14.2 through the integration of functional and epigenomic analyses. Functional experiments demonstrated that unmethylated rs188303909 acted as a strong allele-specific distal enhancer to regulate EN1 expression by modifying the binding of transcription factor E2F6, but rs188303909 methylation attenuated the active effect of E2F6 on EN1 expression. Importantly, transcription factor EN1 could differentially bind osteoporosis GWAS lead SNPs rs4869739-T and rs4355801-G to upregulate CCDC170 and COLEC10 expression, thus promoting bone formation. Our study provided a mechanistic insight into expression regulation of the osteoporosis susceptibility gene EN1, which could be a potential therapeutic target for osteoporosis precision medicine. KEY MESSAGES: CpG-SNP rs188303909 is a causal SNP at the osteoporosis susceptibility locus 2q14.2. Rs188303909 distally regulatesEN1expression by modulating DNA methylation and E2F6 binding. EN1 upregulatesCCDC170 and COLEC10expression through osteoporosis GWAS lead SNPs rs4869739 and rs4355801.

Combined reference-free and multi-reference based GWAS uncover cryptic variation underlying rapid adaptation in a fungal plant pathogen.

Microbial pathogens often harbor substantial functional diversity driven by structural genetic variation. Rapid adaptation from such standing variation threatens global food security and human health. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) provide a powerful approach to identify genetic variants underlying recent pathogen adaptation. However, the reliance on single reference genomes and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) obscures the true extent of adaptive genetic variation. Here, we show quantitatively how a combination of multiple reference genomes and reference-free approaches captures substantially more relevant genetic variation compared to single reference mapping. We performed reference-genome based association mapping across 19 reference-quality genomes covering the diversity of the species. We contrasted the results with a reference-free (i.e., k-mer) approach using raw whole-genome sequencing data in a panel of 145 strains collected across the global distribution range of the fungal wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici. We mapped the genetic architecture of 49 life history traits including virulence, reproduction and growth in multiple stressful environments. The inclusion of additional reference genome SNP datasets provides a nearly linear increase in additional loci mapped through GWAS. Variants detected through the k-mer approach explained a higher proportion of phenotypic variation than a reference genome-based approach and revealed functionally confirmed loci that classic GWAS approaches failed to map. The power of GWAS in microbial pathogens can be significantly enhanced by comprehensively capturing structural genetic variation. Our approach is generalizable to a large number of species and will uncover novel mechanisms driving rapid adaptation of pathogens.

Improving power of genome-wide association studies via transforming ordinal phenotypes into continuous phenotypes.

Ordinal traits are important complex traits in crops, while genome-wide association study (GWAS) is a widely-used method in their gene mining. Presently, GWAS of continuous quantitative traits (C-GWAS) and single-locus association analysis method of ordinal traits are the main methods used for ordinal traits. However, the detection power of these two methods is low. To address this issue, we proposed a new method, named MTOTC, in which hierarchical data of ordinal traits are transformed into continuous phenotypic data (CPData). Then, FASTmrMLM, one C-GWAS method, was used to conduct GWAS for CPData. The results from the simulation studies showed that, MTOTC+FASTmrMLM for ordinal traits was better than the classical methods when there were four and fewer hierarchical levels. In addition, when MTOTC was combined with FASTmrEMMA, mrMLM, ISIS EM-BLASSO, pLARmEB, and pKWmEB, relatively high power and low false positive rate in QTN detection were observed as well. Subsequently, MTOTC was applied to analyze the hierarchical data of soybean salt-alkali tolerance. It was revealed that more significant QTNs were detected when MTOTC was combined with any of the above six C-GWAs. Accordingly, the new method increases the choices of the GWAS methods for ordinal traits and helps to mine the genes for ordinal traits in resource populations.

Data-adaptive and pathway-based tests for association studies between somatic mutations and germline variations in human cancers.

Cancer is a disease driven by a combination of inherited genetic variants and somatic mutations. Recently available large-scale sequencing data of cancer genomes have provided an unprecedented opportunity to study the interactions between them. However, previous studies on this topic have been limited by simple, low statistical power tests such as Fisher's exact test. In this paper, we design data-adaptive and pathway-based tests based on the score statistic for association studies between somatic mutations and germline variations. Previous research has shown that two single-nucleotide polymorphism(SNP)-set-based association tests, adaptive sum of powered score (aSPU) and data-adaptive pathway-based(aSPUpath) tests, increase the power in genome-wide association studies (GWASs) with a single disease trait in a case-control study. We extend aSPU and aSPUpath to multi-traits, that is, somatic mutations of multiple genes in a cohort study, allowing extensive information aggregation at both SNP and gene levels. -values from different parameters assuming varying genetic architecture are combined to yield data-adaptive tests for somatic mutations and germline variations. Extensive simulations show that, in comparison with some commonly used methods, our data-adaptive somatic mutations/germline variations tests can be applied to multiple germline SNPs/genes/pathways, and generally have much higher statistical powers while maintaining the appropriate type I error. The proposed tests are applied to a large-scale real-world International Cancer Genome Consortiumwhole genome sequencing data set of 2583 subjects, detecting more significant and biologically relevant associations compared with the other existing methods on both gene and pathway levels. Our study has systematically identified the associations between various germline variations and somatic mutations across different cancer types, which potentially provides valuable utility for cancer risk prediction, prognosis, and therapeutics.

Boosting the power of genome-wide association studies within and across ancestries by using polygenic scores.

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been mostly conducted in populations of European ancestry, which currently limits the transferability of their findings to other populations. Here, we show, through theory, simulations and applications to real data, that adjustment of GWAS analyses for polygenic scores (PGSs) increases the statistical power for discovery across all ancestries. We applied this method to analyze seven traits available in three large biobanks with participants of East Asian ancestry (n = 340,000 in total) and report 139 additional associations across traits. We also present a two-stage meta-analysis strategy whereby, in contributing cohorts, a PGS-adjusted GWAS is rerun using PGSs derived from a first round of a standard meta-analysis. On average, across traits, this approach yields a 1.26-fold increase in the number of detected associations (range 1.07- to 1.76-fold increase). Altogether, our study demonstrates the value of using PGSs to increase the power of GWASs in underrepresented populations and promotes such an analytical strategy for future GWAS meta-analyses.

Guidelines for Evaluating the Comparability of Down-Sampled GWAS Summary Statistics

Proprietary genetic datasets are valuable for boosting the statistical power of genome-wide association studies (GWASs), but their use can restrict investigators from publicly sharing the resulting summary statistics. Although researchers can resort to sharing down-sampled versions that exclude restricted data, down-sampling reduces power and might change the genetic etiology of the phenotype being studied. These problems are further complicated when using multivariate GWAS methods, such as genomic structural equation modeling (Genomic SEM), that model genetic correlations across multiple traits. Here, we propose a systematic approach to assess the comparability of GWAS summary statistics that include versus exclude restricted data. Illustrating this approach with a multivariate GWAS of an externalizing factor, we assessed the impact of down-sampling on (1) the strength of the genetic signal in univariate GWASs, (2) the factor loadings and model fit in multivariate Genomic SEM, (3) the strength of the genetic signal at the factor level, (4) insights from gene-property analyses, (5) the pattern of genetic correlations with other traits, and (6) polygenic score analyses in independent samples. For the externalizing GWAS, although down-sampling resulted in a loss of genetic signal and fewer genome-wide significant loci; the factor loadings and model fit, gene-property analyses, genetic correlations, and polygenic score analyses were found robust. Given the importance of data sharing for the advancement of open science, we recommend that investigators who generate and share down-sampled summary statistics report these analyses as accompanying documentation to support other researchers’ use of the summary statistics.