Povidone-iodine Irrigation Research Articles

Systemic iodine levels increase with povidone-iodine irrigation, but does this affect thyroid functions? A case-control study.

Intraoperative irrigation with diluted povidone iodine (PI) can be used to reduce the incidence of infection-related complications in arthroplasty surgeries. Since PI is associated with many interventions, especially skin antisepsis, its systemic effects are being studied. The aim of our study is to evaluate the systemic effects of PI, which we use as an irrigation solution, by means of urine iodine and thyroid function tests. In this case-control study, 96 patients who underwent knee or hip arthroplasty were included and divided into two groups according to the irrigation solution. In the first group, PI was added to the standard irrigation. The second group was considered as the control group and only standard irrigation was applied. Urine iodine, thyroid stimulating hormone, free T3 and free T4 values were compared in the preoperative and postoperative periods of these two groups. In this way, the effect of absorbed iodine on thyroid functions was investigated. In the diluted PI group, urinary iodine levels were measured at maximum levels (450µg/L) in the early postoperative period in most of the patients. The statistically significant difference in urinary iodine levels between the PI group and the control group, which started in the early postoperative period, continued until the last follow-up on the 14th postoperative day. In terms of thyroid functions, the observed differences were not statistically significant. Studies to reduce periprosthetic infection show that PI can be preferred for irrigation before the closure of the joint area in total joint arthroplasty. Although the success of this treatment in periprosthetic infection has been investigated, its systemic examination has not been demonstrated. It was determined that PI treatment, which was seen to decrease in the systemic circulation within 14 days, did not show a statistically significant change in terms of thyroid functions when used at the determined concentration and duration. These results should be evaluated with larger and longer-term studies. Clinical trials ID no. NCT05599841.

Comparison of the effect of combined usage of povidone-iodine irrigation and topical vancomycin powder to the use of povidone-iodine irrigation alone on the periprosthetic joint infection incidence rate in patients undergoing primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: a protocol for multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial

BackgroundWith the increasing number of joint replacement surgeries, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has become a significant concern in orthopedic practice, making research on PJI prevention paramount. Therefore, the study will aim to compare the effect of combined usage of povidone-iodine and topical vancomycin powder to the use of povidone-iodine alone on the PJI incidence rate in patients undergoing primary total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsThe prospective randomized clinical trial will be conducted in two independent voivodeship hospitals with extensive experience in lower limb arthroplasties. The studied material will comprise 840 patients referred to hospitals for primary THA or TKA. The patients will be randomly allocated to two equal groups, receiving two different interventions during joint replacement. In group I, povidone-iodine irrigation and consecutively topical vancomycin powder will be used before wound closure. In group II, only povidone-iodine lavage irrigation will be used before wound closure. The primary outcome will be the incidence rate of PJI based on the number of patients with PJI occurrence within 90 days after arthroplasty. The occurrence will be determined using a combined approach, including reviewing hospital records for readmissions and follow-up phone interviews with patients. The infection will be diagnosed based on Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. The chi-square test will be used to compare the infection rates between the two studied groups. Risk and odds ratios for the between-groups comparison purposes will also be estimated. Medical cost analysis will also be performed.DiscussionA randomized clinical trial comparing the effect of combined usage of povidone-iodine irrigation and vancomycin powder to the use of povidone-iodine irrigation alone in preventing PJIs after primary arthroplasty is crucial to advancing knowledge in orthopedic surgery, improving patient outcomes, and guiding evidence-based clinical practices.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05972603. Registered on 2 August 2023.

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Four Different Irrigation Solutions on Postoperative Sequelae in Patients Undergoing Lower Third Molar Surgery: A Prospective Study.

Introduction Oral and maxillofacial surgeons frequently perform the removal of impacted mandibular third molars. The success of this surgical intervention depends on meticulous surgical technique and the use of appropriate irrigants to minimize complications in the postoperative period. Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of four different irrigation solutions (povidone-iodine, metronidazole, chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX), and normal saline)on postoperative sequelae like pain, trismus, swelling, and alveolar osteitisfollowing surgical extraction of the impacted mandibular third molars. Materials and methods The current research was a randomized study carried out at Saveetha Dental College and Hospital in Chennai, India, from December 2022 to March 2023.The study population consisted of 112 participants who were referred to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. The population was divided into four groups, with 28in each group. They were categorized as A, B, C, and D based on the final irrigation solution used after surgical removal of the impacted teeth. In group A, patients received 0.5% povidone-iodine as the final irrigation solution; group B received 1% metronidazole; group C received 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX); and group D received 0.9% normal saline.Patients were examined on the first and seventh postoperative days to assess pain, swelling, trismus, and alveolar osteitis. The results were analyzed with SPSSStatistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (Released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) software for Windows (MicrosoftCorporation, Redmond, Washington, United States). A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Group B experienced significantly less pain than groups A, C, and D on the first and seventh postoperative days (p<0.05). The facial swelling was significantly less on the first and seventh postoperative day in groupB compared to groups A, B, and D (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant variation observed in trismus (mouth opening) across the groups on both the first postoperative and seventh postoperative days. The presence of alveolar osteitis was seen in groups A, C, and D, but no instances were reported in group B. Conclusion It can be concluded that among the four irrigation solutions used in the lower third molar surgery,metronidazole irrigation solution yielded the best results in terms of less pain, swelling, and alveolar osteitis followed by chlorhexidine.There was no difference between povidone-iodine irrigation and normal saline irrigation on the postoperative sequelae. Postoperative trismus does not depend on the irrigation solutionused in the third molar surgery.

1466. Povidone-Iodine Irrigation versus Saline Irrigation for Reduction of Surgical Site Infections in Patients Undergoing Total Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasty: a large retrospective, propensity matched cohort study

Abstract Background Surgical site infection (SSI) after total hip and total knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) is a serious surgical complication. Perioperative irrigation with antiseptic compounds such as povidone-iodine have been used and are recommended by the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control to reduce this risk. However, evidence supporting its superiority relative to non-antiseptic substances such as saline has been inconsistent. Therefore, we aim to identify if irrigation with povidone-iodine in THA/TKA reduces incidence of SSI in patients compared to saline irrigation. Methods In this retrospective, cohort study of 21,482 patients who underwent TKA or THA, we compared SSI rates between patients who received povidone-iodine irrigation and saline irrigation. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify risk factors for SSI. We also performed a propensity matched analysis. Each patient’s propensity for receiving povidone-iodine irrigation was calculated using select patient and surgical variables. Standardized mean differences were calculated to confirm reduction of potential confounding between the matched groups. Results There were 8,486 patients given saline irrigation and 12,996 patients given povidone-iodine irrigation (Table 1). In the univariate analysis, we did not identify a difference between povidone-iodine and saline (p = 0.76). Multivariate analysis showed diabetes, general anesthesia, and a procedure time of 2-3 hours increased risk of SSI, but povidone-iodine irrigation was not significantly different from saline (OR 1.1; CI 0.6-1.9) (Table 2). After propensity score matching there were 21 (0.25%) SSI in the povidone-iodine group and 19 (0.23%) in the saline group. Standardized mean differences were below 0.2 for all selected variables (Table 3). Odds of SSI were no different between the two matched groups (OR 1.1; CI 0.6-2.1).Table 1.Overview of patient and surgical variables by irrigation solution.Table 2.Multivariable analysis adjusted for age, sex, diabetes mellitus, anesthesia type, and procedure time. Showing odds of developing a surgical site infection.Table 3.Graph of standardized mean differences before and after matching. Blue dots represent unmatched cohort. Orange dots represent matched cohort. Table shows odds of developing a surgical site infection for the matched cohort. Conclusion Our analysis indicates no difference between povidone-iodine and saline irrigation in reducing SSI after THA/TKA. In situations where financial cost may be a factor in determining whether to use saline or povidone-iodine, we conclude that saline irrigation is equally efficacious and therefore a reasonable choice. Disclosures Eric Smith, MD, Conformis: Advisor/Consultant|Depuy: Advisor/Consultant

Povidone-iodine intra-abdominal irrigation versus no irrigation in pediatric perforated appendicitis: A secondary economic analysis of a Bayesian randomized controlled trial

BackgroundA pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in children (2–17 ​y) with perforated appendicitis demonstrated an 89% probability of reduced intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) rate with povidone-iodine (PVI) irrigation, compared with no irrigation (NI). We hypothesized that PVI also reduced 30-day hospital costs. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective economic analysis of a pilot RCT. Hospital costs, inflated to 2019 U.S. dollars, were obtained for index admissions and 30-day emergency visits and readmissions. Cost differences between groups were assessed using frequentist and Bayesian generalized linear models. ResultsWe observed a 95% Bayesian probability that PVI reduced 30-day mean total hospital costs ($16,555 [PVI] versus $18,509 [NI]; Bayesian cost ratio: 0.90, 95% CrI, 0.78–1.03). The mean absolute difference per patient was $1,954 less with PVI (95% CI, -$4,288 to $379). ConclusionsPVI likely reduced the IAA rate and 30-day hospital costs, suggesting the intervention is both clinically superior and cost saving.

The Effect of Povidone-Iodine Irrigation on the Efficacy of Antibiotic Cement In Vitro.

Povidone-iodine is a common antiseptic demonstrating success in reducing infection rates in primary arthroplasty; however, recent data suggest that its use in revision arthroplasty may increase infection rates. This study evaluated the effect of povidone-iodine solution on antibiotic cement and investigated the connection between povidone-iodine and increased infection rates in revision arthroplasty. Sixty antibiotic cement samples (ACSs) were formed using gentamicin-impregnated cement. The ACSs were divided into three groups: group A (n=20) was subject to a 3-minute povidone-iodine soak followed by a saline rinse; group B (n=20) underwent a 3-minute saline soak; and group C (n=20) underwent only a saline rinse. The antimicrobial activity of the samples was tested using a Kirby-Bauer-like assay using Staphylococcus epidermidis. The zone of inhibition (ZOI) was measured every 24 hours for 7 days. All groups possessed the greatest antimicrobial activity at 24 hours. Group C displayed a mass-corrected ZOI of 395.2 mm/g, which was statistically greater than the group B ZOI (313.2 mm/g, P<.05) but not the group A ZOI (346.5 mm/g, P>.05). All groups demonstrated a decrease in antimicrobial activity at 48 through 96 hours, with no significant difference at any time point. Prolonged soaking of antibiotic cement in a povidone-iodine or saline solution results in elution of the antibiotic into the irrigation solution, blunting initial antibiotic concentration. When using antibiotic cement, antiseptic soaks or irrigation should be focused prior to cementation. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(1):10-14.].

THE PROCESS OF WOUND HEALING IN POST SECTIO CAESAREA PATIENTS USING NORMAL SALINE (0.9%) AND POVIDONE-IODINE (10%) IRRIGATIONS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is a complication after surgery, and one of the causes is the use of intra-operative irrigation fluids. The most common irrigation fluid was 0.9% Normal Saline and 10% Povidone-Iodine in several hospitals in Indonesia. However, the difference in composition has not been observed for its effect on wound healing. This study aimed to determine the difference in using 0.9% Normal Saline and 10% Povidone-Iodine for irrigation in the wound healing process for post-cesarean patients. The research design used is a descriptive comparative study with ex post facto approaches. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers changed the data collection method from direct observations to analyzing secondary data post-cesarean surgery data in 2019. The study was conducted in a referral hospital in West Java Province, Indonesia. The sampling used non-probability sampling with a purposive sampling technique. The sample was 440 patient medical records. These records consisted of 0.9% Normal Saline irrigation fluid, 140 respondents, and 10% Povidone-Iodine irrigation fluid, 300 respondents. The chi-square analysis showed significant differences in the two types of intra-operative wound irrigation (0.9% Normal Saline and 10% Povidone-Iodine) with a wound healing process (P-value = 0.021). The distribution frequency showed that the infection of 0.9% Normal Saline fluid was 5% of the 133 respondents, and 10% Povidone-Iodine was 12% out of 300 respondents. The study results showed that 0.9% Normal Saline and 10% Povidone-iodine could be used for intra-operative wound irrigation with different characteristics and compositions that impact the postoperative wound healing process. There is a need for further research to do a direct observation to test the effectiveness of two types of irrigation fluids from intra-operative to postoperative and assess other influencing factors.

Low-concentration Povidone-iodine and Normal Saline as Irrigant on Reducing Postoperative Complications after the Third-molar Surgery: A Comparative Study

This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of using 0.5 mg/mL povidone-iodine solution as an irrigant and coolant in reducing postoperative sequelae like swelling, trismus, and pain with the conventional normal saline irrigation during the surgical removal of the impacted lower third molar. The research was conducted out toward the MES Dental College in Perinthalmanna, Kerala, in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. After mandibular third-molar surgical removal, researchers studied 60 individuals, 30 of whom had normal saline irrigation (group I), and 30 of whom received 0.05% povidone-iodine irrigation (group II). The postoperative discomforts were measured on the second and seventh days after surgery, respectively. After that, the data were analyzed using SPSS. The data analysis considered p-values less than 0.05 to be significant. At the second postoperative visit, patients in the povidone-iodine group reported much less pain, swelling, and reduced mouth opening than those in the normal saline group. But on the seventh postoperative day, there was not much difference between either group. Following the surgical removal of teeth, it was revealed that povidone-iodine solution (0.5 mg/mL) was more effective as irrigation and cooling aid than regular saline solution. Low-concentrated povidone-iodine is a better option in dentistry as irrigant.

Strategies reducing risk of surgical-site infection following pediatric spinal deformity surgery.

Identifying beneficial preventive strategies for surgical-site infection (SSI) in individual patients with different clinical and surgical characteristics is challenging. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between preventive strategies and patient risk of SSI taking into consideration baseline risks and estimating the reduction of SSI probability in individual patients attributed to these strategies. Pediatric patients who underwent primary, revision, or final fusion for their spinal deformity at 7 institutions between 2004 and 2018 were included. Preventive strategies included the use of topical vancomycin, bone graft, povidone-iodine (PI) irrigations, multilayered closure, impermeable dressing, enrollment in quality improvement (QI) programs, and adherence to antibiotic prophylaxis. The CDC definition of SSI as occurring within 90days postoperatively was used. Multiple regression modeling was performed following multiple imputation and multicollinearity testing to investigate the effect of preventive strategies on SSI in individual patients adjusted for patient and surgical characteristics. Univariable regressions demonstrated that enrollment in QI programs and PI irrigation were significantly associated, and topical vancomycin, multilayered closure, and correct intraoperative dosing of antibiotics trended toward association with reduction of SSI. In the final prediction model using multiple regression, enrollment in QI programs remained significant and PI irrigation had an effect in decreasing risks of SSI by average of 49% and 18%, respectively, at the individual patient level. Considering baseline patient characteristics and predetermined surgical and hospital factors, enrollment in QI programs and PI irrigation reduce the risk of SSI in individual patients. Multidisciplinary efforts should be made to implement these practices to increase patient safety. Prognostic level III study.

Irrigation techniques used in spine surgery for surgical site infection prophylaxis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe greater likelihood of morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stays and poorer long-term outcomes as a result of surgical site infections secondary to spinal surgery makes prophylactic measures an imperative focus. Therefore, the aim of this review was to evaluate the available research related to the efficacy of different intraoperative irrigation techniques used in spinal surgery for surgical site infection (SSI) prophylaxis.MethodsWe performed a comprehensive search using Ovid Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane library pertaining to this topic. Our meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria consist of spine surgeries with intraoperative use of any wound irrigation technique, comparison groups with a different intraoperative irrigation technique or no irrigation, SSI identified with bacterial cultures or clinically in the postoperative period, reported SSI rates. Data extracted from eligible studies included, but was not limited to, SSI rates, irrigation technique and control technique. Exclusion criteria consist of articles with no human subjects, reviews, meta-analyses and case control studies and no details about SSI identification or rates. Pooled risk ratios were calculated. A meta-analysis was performed with a forest plot to determine risk estimates’ heterogeneity with I2 index, Q-statistic, and p value under a random-effects model. Funnel plot was used to assess publication bias. All databases were last checked on January, 2022. PROBAST tool was used to assess both risk of bias and applicability concerns.ResultsAfter reviewing 1494 titles and abstracts, 18 articles met inclusion criteria. They included three prospective randomized-controlled trials, 13 retrospective cohort studies, two prospective cohort studies. There were 54 (1.8%) cases of SSIs in the povidone-iodine irrigation group (N = 2944) compared to 159 (4.6%) in the control group (N = 3408). Using intraoperative povidone-iodine wound irrigation produced an absolute risk reduction of 2.8%. Overall risk ratio was 0.32 (95% CI 0.20–0.53, p < 0.00001). In a global analysis, study heterogeneity and synthesizing mostly retrospective data were primary limitations.ConclusionThe most evidence exists for povidone-iodine and has Level 2 evidence supporting SSI reduction during spinal surgery. Other antiseptic solutions such as dilute chlorhexidine lack published evidence in this patient population which limits the ability to draw conclusions related to its use in spinal surgery.Level of EvidenceII – Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

The Toxicity and Antibacterial Effects of Povidone-Iodine Irrigation in Fracture Surgery.

ObjectiveSurgical site infection is a common complication of surgery, especially in orthopedics. Povidone‐Iodine (PI) is one of the oldest and most commonly used disinfectants in surgery. However, the toxicity and antimicrobial effect of PI have not been discussed. In addition, no study has explored the optimum PI concentration for sterilization and tissue healing. This study explores the germicidal efficacy of different concentrations PI, in addition, the toxicity and antibacterial effects of PI irrigation in fracture surgery are also discussed.MethodsMethicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) were used to evaluate the germicidal efficacy of PI in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, the effects of PI on bacterial growth were analyzed. 2.5%, 1.25%, 0.5%, 0.25%, 0.05%, 0.025%, 0.005%, 0.0025% and 0% PI was added into the bacterial suspension, besides, the bacterial algebra and growth rate were tested. Meanwhile, the fluorescence intensity of viable bacteria was also tested to evaluate the effects of PI on bacterial survival. In vivo, first, femoral fracture with wound infection rat models were established. Second, thyroid gland sections, blood thyroxine, urinary iodine, wound local skin, muscle and bone tissue sections, serum creatinine and alanine aminotransferase, serum and bone local tissue interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), interleukin‐10 (IL‐10), bone morphogenetic protein (BMP‐2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and transforming growth factor (TGF‐β1) were detected in rat femoral shaft fracture model with 5%, 2.5%, 0.5%, 0.05%, and 0% PI irrigation. Third, tissue bacteria culture was tested in rat femoral fracture with wound infection model with different concentrations PI irrigation.Results In vitro, 2.5%, 1.25%, 0.5% PI inhibited the growth of bacteria. 1.25%, 0.5% PI killed all the bacteria, while 0.25%, 0.05% PI had not killed bacteria after about 10 min. The iodine absorption of 5%, 2.5%, 0.5% PI irrigation did not cause thyroid injury. The 5%, 2.5%, 0.5% PI irrigation did not make serum creatinine and alanine aminotransferase abnormal and can remove bacteria from wounds. The 0.5%, 2.5% PI irrigation can promote tissue healing and increase BMP‐2, VEGF, TGF‐β1, IL‐10, in addition, decrease IL‐6. 5% PI irrigation would inhibit tissue healing, and increase IL‐6, decrease BMP‐2, VEGF, TGF‐β1, IL‐10.ConclusionsPovidone‐Iodine was a widely used disinfectant and 2.5%, 1.25% and 0.5% PI could effectively kill bacteria. Five percent and lower concentration PI irrigation was safe and could not cause thyroid, kidney and liver damage. The 0.5% PI irrigation was beneficial for tissue healing but 5% PI irrigation was the opposite.

Does the use of intrawound povidone-iodine irrigation and local vancomycin powder impact surgical site infection rate in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery?

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a major complication after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery, with an incidence ranging from 0.5 to 7%. Intraoperative wound decontamination with povidone-iodine (PVP-I) irrigation and/or vancomycin powder in adult spinal surgery has gained attention in the literature with controversial results. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of using intrawound PVP-I irrigation and local vancomycin powder (LVP) on the incidence of early SSI in AIS surgery. All AIS patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion between October 2016 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of early SSI was reported and compared between 2 groups defined by the treating spinal surgeons' preferences: group 1-intrawound irrigation with 2L of PVP-I and application of 3g LVP before closure and control group 2-patients that did not receive either of these measures. Nine early cases of SSI (2.9%) were reported among the 307 AIS posterior spinal fusion patients. Incidence of SSI in group 1 (2/178 = 1.1%) was significantly lower than in group 2 (7/129 = 5.4%; p = 0.04). There were no adverse reactions to the use of PVP-I and LVP in our study. At latest follow-up, rate of surgical revision for mechanical failure with pseudarthrosis was significantly lower in group 1 (2/178 = 1.1%) than in group 2 (9/129 = 7.0%; p = 0.01). Intraoperative use of intrawound PVP-I irrigation and vancomycin powder is associated with a significant reduction of early SSI after AIS spine surgery. Retrospective study.

Management of Fournier’s gangrene during the Covid-19 pandemic era: make a virtue out of necessity

BackgroundFournier’s gangrene (FG) is a necrotizing fasciitis caused by aerobic and anaerobic bacterial infection that involves genitalia and perineum. Males, in their 60 s, are more affected with 1.6 new cases/100.000/year. Main risk factors are diabetes, malignancy, inflammatory bowel disease. FG is a potentially lethal disease with a rapid and progressive involvement of subcutaneous and fascial plane. A multimodal approach with surgical debridement, antibiotic therapy, intensive support care, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is often needed.We present the inpatient management of an FG case during the Covid-19 pandemic period. A narrative review of the Literature searching “Fournier’s gangrene”, “necrotizing fasciitis” on PubMed and Scopus was performed.Case presentationA 60 years old man affected by diabetes mellitus, with ileostomy after colectomy for ulcerative colitis, was admitted to our Emergency Department with fever and acute pain, edema, dyschromia of right hemiscrotum, penis, and perineal region. Computed tomography revealed air-gas content and fluid-edematous thickening of these regions. Fournier’s Gangrene Severity Index was 9. A prompt broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy with Piperacillin/Tazobactam, Imipenem and Daptomycin, surgical debridement of genitalia and perineal region with vital tissue exposure, were performed. Bedside daily surgical wound medications with fibrine debridement, normal saline and povidone-iodine solutions irrigation, iodoform and fatty gauze application, were performed until discharge on the 40th postoperative day. Every 3 days office-based medication with silver dressing, after normal saline and povidone-iodine irrigation and fibrinous tissue debridement, was performed until complete re-epithelialization of the scrotum on the 60th postoperative day.ConclusionsFG is burdened by a high mortality rate, up to 30%. In the literature, HBOT could improve wound restoration and disease-specific survival. Unfortunately, in our center, we do not have HBOT. Moreover, one of the pandemic period problems was the patient’s displacement and outpatient hospital management. For all these reasons we decided for a conservative inpatient management. Daily cleaning of the surgical wound allowed to obtain its complete restoration avoiding surgical graft and hyperbaric oxygen chamber therapy, without foregoing optimal outcomes.

Povidone-iodine irrigation reduces infection after total hip and knee arthroplasty.

One of the most important challenges faced by orthopedic surgeons is periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). PJI is a common cause for total joint arthroplasty failure with an incidence of 0.3-1.9%. PJI can be devastating for the patient and extremely costly for the healthcare system. There is concern that a major cause of PJI is intra-operative colonization and recent studies have shown a decrease in PJI with the use of dilute povidone-iodine (Betadine®, Avrio Health L.P, Stamford, CT) irrigation prior to wound closure. This study presents our experience with the use of dilute Betadine® irrigation prior to wound closure and its effect on our post-operative hip and knee arthroplasty acute infection rate. Retrospective chart review performed at our hospital looking at PJI amongst patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between 2013 and 2017 comparing different irrigation methods (n = 3232). The study group (n = 1207) underwent irrigation prior to wound closure with dilute Betadine for 3min and the control group (n = 1511) underwent irrigation using normal saline (NS). Using a logistic regression model where the following variables were adjusted for; ASA, age, sex, foley insertion, surgical duration and diabetes mellitus status a statistical significant reduction was seen in any infection (OR 0.45 [0.22; 0.89], p value < 0.05) and SSI (OR 0.30 [0.13; 0.70], p value 0.01) with the Betadine group. No significant reduction was seen with deep infections with the Betadine group compared to the NS group. PJI is a devastating complication following total joint arthroplasty and we found Betadine compared to NS irrigation provides an inexpensive and simple method to lower any PJI and more specifically SSI in THA and TKA. III.

Effect of wound irrigation on the prevention of surgical site infections: A meta-analysis.

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of wound irrigation on the prevention of surgical site infections. A systematic literature search up to January 2022 was done and 24 studies included 4967 subjects under surgery at the start of the study; antibiotic irrigation was used with 1372 of them, 1261 were aqueous povidone-iodine irrigation, and 2334 were saline irrigation or no irrigation for surgical site infections prevention in all surgical populations. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the effect of different wound irrigation on the prevention of surgical site infections by the dichotomous method with a random or fixed-influence model. Antibiotic irrigation had significantly lower surgical site infections in all surgical populations (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.36-0.62, P< .001) compared with saline irrigation or no irrigation for the subject under surgery. Aqueous povidone-iodine irrigation had significantly lower surgical site infections in all surgical populations (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20-0.81, P= .01) compared with saline irrigation or no irrigation for the subject under surgery. Antibiotic irrigation and aqueous povidone-iodine irrigation significantly lowered surgical site infections in all surgical populations compared with saline irrigation or no irrigation for the subject under surgery. Further studies are required.

Safety Measures for Maintaining Low Endophthalmitis Rate after Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injection before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, intravitreal injections are performed with patients wearing masks. The risk of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection is reported to increase due to an influx of exhaled air containing oral bacteria from the upper part of the mask onto the ocular surface. We retrospectively investigated the incidence of endophthalmitis when intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections were performed using the same infection control measures before and during the pandemic. Vitreoretinal specialists performed intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents in the outpatient room of a university hospital. Infection control measures before and during the pandemic included covering the patient’s eye with adhesive face drape and irrigating the ocular surface with 0.25% povidone-iodine before draping, and immediately before and after injection. Before the COVID-19 pandemic (February 2016 to December 2019), one case of endophthalmitis occurred among 31,173 injections performed (0.0032%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.000008–0.017872%). During the COVID-19 pandemic (January 2020 to August 2021), one case of endophthalmitis occurred among 14,725 injections performed (0.0068%; 95% CI, 0.000017–0.037832%). There was no significant difference between the two periods (Fisher’s exact test: p = 0.5387). Even during the COVID-19 pandemic, very low incidence of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection can be maintained by implementing basic infection prophylactic measures, including face draping and 0.25% povidone-iodine irrigation, established before COVID-19 pandemic.

Dilute Povidone-Iodine Irrigation Reduces the Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 31,331 Cases.

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) surgeons employ various strategies to reduce the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Few studies have examined the efficacy of preclosure dilute povidone-iodine irrigation in a large cohort accounting for recent practice changes in TJA. This study compared the risk of PJI in TJA patients with and without dilute povidone-iodine irrigation. This is a retrospective study of all consecutive primary TJAs between 2009 and 2019 at a single institution. We included 31,331 cases, of which 8659 were irrigated with dilute povidone-iodine and 22,672 were irrigated with sterile saline prior to closure. The primary endpoint was PJI as defined by 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the association between dilute povidone-iodine irrigation and PJI while controlling for demographics, comorbidities, and operative factors. In total, 340 patients (1.09%) developed PJI. Dilute povidone-iodine irrigation was associated with 2.34 times lower rate of PJI (0.6% vs 1.3%). Using multiple regression, dilute povidone-iodine remained significantly associated with a reduction in PJI. The absolute risk reduction was 0.73% and number needed to treat was 137 patients. Female gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, operative time, anesthesia type, prophylactic antibiotic type, and tranexamic acid were other significant factors in the regression model. The routine use of dilute povidone-iodine could prevent 1 PJI for every 137 TJA patients, regardless of their preoperative risk. These findings support the use of povidone-iodine irrigation as a safe and cost-effective measure to reduce PJI.

Dilute povidone-iodine irrigation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy to reduce postoperative infective complications - Is there any benefit?

Infectious complications following stone lithotripsy is a significant source of patient morbidity and mortality. Post percutaneous nephrolithotomy fever is reported in 37% of patients undergoing PCNL and sepsis is the most common cause of mortality following PCNL. Thus, there is an urgent need to tackle lithotripsy-associated bacteremia occurring intraoperatively, keeping in mind the threat of emerging global antibiotic resistance. The aim of our study was to study the efficacy of using intermittent 0.35% dilute Povidone-Iodine (PI) irrigation during PCNL in reducing postoperative infection rate. This is a prospective observational study done in 24 patients diagnosed with Staghorn and matrix calculi requiring PCNL. All patients were taken up for the procedure with sterile urine culture or after treating them with culture-specific antibiotic with initial positive urine culture. Intraoperative pelvic urine was sent for culture and sensitivity. 0.35% dilute PI irrigation was used intermittently during the procedure. Patients were monitored and assessed for signs of post-PCNL infection and PI-related side effects. The results were compared with similar group of patients with similar stone characteristics who underwent PCNL before adopting the dilute PI irrigation protocol (non-PI irrigation group). Among 24 patients, 18 patients had partial or complete Staghorn and 6 had matrix calculi. Five patients with Staghorn and three patients with matrix calculi had positive renal pelvic urine culture. In the non-PI irrigation group, 19 patients had Staghorn stones and 5 had matrix calculi. Three patients with Staghorn and two patients with matrix calculi had positive renal pelvic urine culture. Three patients (12.5%) had postoperative fever in the dilute PI irrigation group, compared to 11 patients (45.8%) in the non-PI irrigation group. No patient had PI-related complications. Our prospective study highlights that the use of 0.35% dilute PI irrigation intermittently during PCNL reduces the postoperative infection rate significantly.

Evidence-Based Wound Irrigation: Separating Fact from Fiction.

The relationship between wound irrigation and healing has been recognized for centuries. However, there is little evidence and no official recommendations from any health care organization regarding best wound irrigation practices. This is the first review of wound irrigation that systematically summarizes the literature using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and distills the evidence into a practical format. In this comprehensive review, the authors outline the irrigation fluids and delivery methods used in the identified studies, analyze reported treatment outcomes, summarize irrigation effectiveness, and propose evidence-based guidelines to improve wound healing outcomes and enhance the consistency of wound irrigation. Thirty-one high-quality studies with a combined total of 61,808 patients were included. Based on the current evidence provided by this review, the authors propose the following guidelines: (1) acute soft-tissue wounds should receive continuous gravity flow irrigation with polyhexanide; (2) complex wounds should receive continuous negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation with polyhexanide; (3) infected wounds should receive continuous negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation with silver nitrate, polyhexanide, acetic acid, or povidone-iodine; (4) breast implant wounds should receive gravity lavage with povidone-iodine or antibiotics; and (5) surgical-site infection rates can be reduced with intraoperative povidone-iodine irrigation.

Oral transmucosal absorption of iodine after intraoral preparation with povidone-iodine prior to oral surgeries: a randomized controlled study in 12 male patients.

Absorption of iodine through skin and an increased incidence of thyroid disorders due to iodophor exposure are reported. However, the risk of oral transmucosal absorption of povidone-iodine after intraoral preparation is not clear. To investigate the possibility of oral transmucosal absorption of povidone-iodine after intraoral preparation and its effect on thyroxine level in blood. A randomized controlled study was carried out in the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Twenty- to 40-year-old healthy male adults planning to receive oral surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled. The study group received povidone-iodine irrigation of oral cavity for 3min as intraoral preparation before operation. The control group received chlorhexidine gluconate irrigation of oral cavity for 3min as intraoral preparation before operation. Iodine levels in blood and urine, and thyroxine levels in blood were tested and compared, before and after operation. In total, 24 patients were included and analyzed finally. We found that after intraoral preparation with povidone-iodine, serum iodine level increased significantly to 2-3 times the pre-operation level in 15-30min, and the urinary iodine level increased to 5 times the pre-operation level on the first day after operation. Iodine levels in blood and urine decreased significantly on the third day after operation but still significantly greater than the pre-operation levels. However, thyroxine levels were not altered accordingly. Oral transmucosal absorption of iodine is observed when povidone-iodine is used for intraoral preparation in healthy male adults, though the free thyroxine in blood is not affected accordingly. Povidone-iodine is commonly used as an antiseptic in oral surgery and dental clinics. Based on our findings that iodine levels in blood and urine may elevate significantly after intraoral preparation with povidone-iodine prior to oral surgeries, care must be taken for individuals when excess iodine intakes can endanger the safety of the patient. Name of the trial registry: The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn/ ). Registration number: ChiCTR2100042028.