Pouchitis Disease Activity Index Research Articles

The effect of non-pooled multi-donor faecal microbiota transplantation for inducing clinical remission in patients with chronic pouchitis: Results from a multicentre randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (MicroPouch).

To investigate if treatment with non-pooled multi-donor faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for four weeks was superior to placebo to induce clinical remission in patients with chronic pouchitis. The study was a randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled study with a 4-week intervention period and 12-month follow-up. Eligible patients with chronic pouchitis were recruited from five Danish hospitals. Participants were randomised to non-pooled multi-donor FMT derived from four faecal donors, or placebo. Treatment was delivered daily by enema for two weeks followed by every second day for two weeks. Disease severity was accessed at inclusion and 30-day follow-up, using the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI); PDAI <7 was considered equivalent to clinical remission. Faecal samples from participants and donors were analysed by shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Inclusion was stopped after inclusion of 30 participants who were randomised 1:1 for treatment with FMT or placebo. There was no difference in participants achieving clinical remission between the two groups at 30-day follow-up, relative risk 1.0 (95%CI(0.55;1.81)). Treatment with FMT resulted in a clinically relevant increase in adverse events compared to placebo, incidence rate ratio 1.67 (95%CI(1.10;2.52)); no serious adverse events within either group. Faecal microbiota transplantation statistically significantly increased the similarity of participant faecal microbiome to the faecal donor microbiome at 30-days follow-up (p=0.01), which was not seen after placebo. Non-pooled multi-donor FMT was comparable to placebo in inducing clinical remission in patients with chronic pouchitis but showed a clinically relevant increase in adverse events compared to placebo.

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF USTEKINUMAB FOR CHRONIC POUCHITIS: A PROSPECTIVE OPEN-LABEL MULTICENTER STUDY

Seventeen percent of patients with ulcerative colitis that undergo proctocolectomy with pouch surgery will develop chronic pouchitis. We evaluated the efficacy of ustekinumab for these patients. We performed a prospective study of chronic pouchitis patients receiving ustekinumab intravenously at baseline (∼6mg/kg) and 90mg ustekinumab subcutaneously every 8 weeks thereafter. The modified pouchitis disease activity index (mPDAI) was assessed at baseline, week 16 and 48. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving steroid-free remission (mPDAI <5 and reduction by ≥2 points) at week 16. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving remission at week 48, the proportion of patients achieving response (reduction of mPDAI by ≥2 points) at week 16 and 48, and change in mPDAI. We enrolled 22 patients (59% male, median age 42.2 years). Remission was achieved in 27.3% at week 16 and 36.4% at week 48. Response was achieved in 54.5% both at week 16 and 48. The median (IQR) mPDAI decreased from 8 (7-10) to 7 (4-9) at week 16 (p=0.007) and 4 (1.75-7.25) at week 48 (p<0.001). The clinical mPDAI subscore decreased from 3.5 (2-4) to 2 (1-3) at week 16 (p=0.009) and 1 (0-2.25) at week 48 (p=0.001). The endoscopic mPDAI subscore decreased from 5.5 (4-6) to 4 (3-6) at week 16 (p=0.032) and 3 (1.75-4.25) at week 48 (p=0.001). Ustekinumab was efficacious in half of the patients suffering from chronic pouchitis. Ustekinumab should therefore be positioned in the treatment algorithm of chronic pouchitis. (ClinicalTrials.gov Number NCT04089345).

P034 Peripheral immune cell activity and biopsy gene expression in chronic pouchitis patients treated with tofacitinib: early induction results from the STOPit trial

Abstract Background The Study of TOfacitinib for the treatment of chronic PouchITis (STOPit) is an investigator-initiated, open-label induction, double-blind, placebo-controlled, maintenance withdrawal study to determine the effectiveness of tofacitinib at inducing and maintaining remission in patients with chronic pouchitis. In this interim assessment, we evaluated blood samples and biopsy gene expression collected during the open-label induction period to discover biomarkers of initial clinical response. Methods We collected blood (n = 10 pairs, n = 5 non-responders) and biopsies (n = 21 pairs, n = 9 non-responders) at baseline and after 8 weeks of tofacitinib induction therapy (all participants received 10 mg twice daily induction). We classified patients as responders if they achieved a decrease of ≥ 2 in their modified pouchitis disease activity index after 8 weeks. Bulk peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and memory CD4+ T cells (TMEMs) were isolated from whole blood samples. Cytokines induced by stimulation in the presence or absence of tofacitinib were assessed in culture supernatants by bead array (PBMCs stimulated with PMA/Io or LPS, TMEMs stimulated with CD3/CD28 tetramer). Gene expression was measured in biopsies by qPCR in the pouch and pre-pouch ileum at both time points. Results At baseline, non-responders produced more IL-17 from both their PBMCs stimulated with PMA/Io and TMEMs stimulated with tetramer than responders, but responders secreted more IL-12p70, MCP, IL-10 and IL-8. Tofacitinib inhibited stimulation-induced IL-10 and IL-6 secretion in PBMCs in both responders and non-responders but failed to reduce IFNγ and TNF secretion selectively in non-responders only. All cytokine responses investigated in TMEMs, including IFNγ and TNF, were inhibited by tofacitinib in both responders and non-responders, suggesting the PBMC cell type refractory to inhibition with tofacitinib in non-responders is not TMEMs. Baseline biopsy ileal gene expression of IL18, HES1 and CXCL10 was decreased in responders compared to non-responders, while MMP7 was increased. Clinical response to tofacitinib led to a reduction in pouch expression of GLIS3, G0S2 and WNT5a from baseline to week 8 whereas these genes were unchanged or increased in non-responders. Conclusion Baseline functional immune cell responses and biopsy gene expression may discriminate chronic pouchitis patients' response to tofacitinib therapy and point to a mechanism underlying non-responsiveness. Recruitment for this trial is ongoing, allowing us to bolster and expand our findings with increasing sample sizes.

P682 A Retrospective Comparison of Different Treatment Modalities in Patients with Chronic Pouchitis

Abstract Background Chronic pouchitis affects ~30% of patients post total colectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery. Treatment with anti-TNF, anti-integrin α4β7, anti-IL-12/23, or Crohn's disease exclusion diet (CDED), have shown promise in different studies. We aimed to compare the efficacy of these treatments in a real-world context and to detect factors that can aid in treatment choices. Methods A retrospective cohort study encompassing demographic, clinic, endoscopic, histologic and lab values of adult ulcerative colitis (UC) patients post-IPAA surgery with chronic pouchitis, treated with biologics or CDED at the Tel Aviv Medical Center. Data were collected at baseline, 12, 26, and 52 weeks of treatment. Primary outcomes were assessed using the modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (mPDAI). mPDAI response was defined as a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points, while mPDAI remission was defined as mPDAI response in addition to mPDAI score ≤4. Results Therapeutic interventions among 51 patients included CDED (n=10), vedolizumab (n=21), ustekinumab (n=7) and adalimumab (n=13) [Table 1]. At 12 and 26 weeks, overall mPDAI response rates were 52% and 48%, respectively, with no significant difference between groups. At 52 weeks, mPDAI response rates were significantly higher for ustekinumab and vedolizumab (60% and 55%, respectively) compared with adalimumab and CDED (27.3% and 0%, respectively), p=0.043. Fecal calprotectin reduction at week-26 was greatest for ustekinumab (93%), followed by vedolizumab (73%), adalimumab (55%), and CDED (-13%), p=0.003. Treatment persistence over 150 weeks was significantly higher for ustekinumab (100%) compared with adalimumab (46%), vedolizumab (33%), and CDED (20%), p&amp;lt;0.001 [Figure 1]. The predominant cause for treatment discontinuation was secondary loss of response (50%), followed by primary non-response and surgical complications (14.7% each), poor compliance (11.8%), side-effects (5.9%), and development of antibodies (2.9%). Patients without prior biologic or immunomodulator treatment for pouchitis had significantly higher mPDAI response rates at 12 weeks (90%, p=0.016 and 73.3%, p=0.03, respectively). Patients with surgical pouch complications showed a trend towards lower mPDAI-defined response rates at 12 weeks (25% vs. 64.7%; p = 0.064). Conclusion Ustekinumab and vedolizumab demonstrate higher likelihood of maintaining long-term clinical and endoscopic response, along with greater reduction in fecal calprotectin compared with adalimumab and CDED. Biologic and immunomodulator therapy-naïve patients achieved higher induction response rates.

P854 Tofacitinib demonstrates preliminary efficacy in induction of remission in chronic pouchitis

Abstract Background Pouchitis is common following total proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and generally responds to antibiotics. However, up to 20% of patients develop either antibiotic-dependent or antibiotic-refractory pouchitis, collectively referred to as chronic pouchitis. Methods We report our preliminary induction results from a multi-center open label induction with randomized withdrawal trial to assess the efficacy of tofacitinib in chronic pouchitis. All eligible participants received 10mg tofacitinib twice daily for 8 weeks, with an additional 8 weeks of therapy given to patients with an inadequate initial clinical response. The primary endpoint was clinical response (a reduction of clinical PDAI≥2) at week 8. Secondary endpoints included endoscopic response (a reduction of endoscopic PDAI≥2), mPDAI remission (modified pouchitis disease activity index (mPDAI)≤ 4 and a reduction of mPDAI≥2), mPDAI response (a reduction of mPDAI≥2) and improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the short inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (SIBDQ). Serum cytokine levels was analyzed using LEGENDplex human inflammation panel 1. Univariate analysis was performed to identify clinical and biochemical predictors of response to tofacitinib. Results A total of 33 patients with chronic pouchitis (Table 1) were included in the preliminary analysis. The clinical and endoscopic response rates at week 8 were 55% and 58% respectively, with a median improvement of 1 (p&amp;lt;0.05) and 3 (p&amp;lt;0.05) respectively (Figure 1). The mPDAI remission rate was 49% at week 8 with an mPDAI response rate of 73%. Endoscopic responders exhibited significant improvements in endoscopic oedema, granularity, friability, and mucous exudate (p&amp;lt;0.05). There was significant improvement in HRQoL, with the median SIBDQ score increasing from 35 at baseline to 54 at week 8 (p&amp;lt;0.05). Eleven patients received a further 8 weeks of therapy with a clinical response rate of 36%, yielding an overall response rate including extended induction of 67%. Univariate analysis did not reveal significant differences in baseline characteristics, clinical, or biochemical markers between responders and non-responders. However, a history of corticosteroid use (p=0.08) and high baseline levels of faecal calprotectin (p=0.15) demonstrated a non-significant association with treatment response. Elevated baseline serum levels of IL-1b, IFN-a and IL-33 were associated with a treatment response at week 8 (p&amp;lt;0.05). Conclusion Tofacitinib demonstrated preliminary efficacy in inducing both clinical and endoscopic response in patients with chronic pouchitis who have undergone IPAA for UC.

Effectiveness and safety of azathioprine for inflammatory pouch disorders: results from the RESERVO study of GETECCU.

The usefulness of thiopurines has been poorly explored in pouchitis and other pouch disorders. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of azathioprine as maintenance therapy in inflammatory pouch disorders. This was a retrospective and multicentre study. We included patients diagnosed with inflammatory pouch disorders treated with azathioprine in monotherapy. Effectiveness was evaluated at 1 year and in the long term based on normalization of stool frequency, absence of pain, faecal urgency or fistula discharge (clinical remission), or any improvement in these symptoms (clinical response). Endoscopic response was evaluated using the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI). In all, 63 patients were included [54% males; median age, 49 (28-77) years]. The therapy was used to treat pouchitis (n = 37) or Crohn's disease of the pouch (n = 26). The rate of clinical response, remission and non-response at 12 months were 52%, 30% and 18%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 23 months (interquartile range 11-55), 19 patients (30%) were in clinical remission, and 45 (66%) stopped therapy. Endoscopic changes were evaluated in 19 cases. PDAI score decreased from 3 (range 2-4) to 1 (range 0-3). In all, 21 patients (33%) presented adverse events and 16 (25%) needed to stop therapy. Azathioprine may be effective in the long term for the treatment of inflammatory pouch disorders and could be included as a therapeutic option.

A novel Monash Pouch diet in patients with an ileoanal pouch is tolerable and has favorable metabolic luminal effects.

To evaluate a whole-food diet strategy (the Monash Pouch diet [MPD]) designed based on the interacting roles dietary factors play with pouch health. Specifically, its tolerability and acceptability, whether it achieved its dietary and metabolic goals, and the effects on symptoms and inflammation were examined. In a 6-week open-label trial, patients with ileoanal pouches educated on the MPD were assessed regarding diet tolerability and acceptance, food intake (7-day food diaries), pouch-related symptoms (clinical pouchitis disease activity index), and, in 24-h fecal samples, calprotectin, fermentative biomarkers, and volatile organic compounds (VOC). Of 12 patients, 6 male, mean (SD) age 55 (5) and pouch age 13 (2) years, one withdrew with partial small bowel obstruction. Tolerability was excellent in 9 (75%) and acceptance was high (81%). Targeted changes in dietary intake were achieved. Fecal branched- to short-chain fatty acid ratio increased by median 60 [IQR: 11-80]% (P = 0.02). Fecal VOCs for 3 compounds were also increased, 2-methyl-5-propan-2-ylcyclohexa-1,3-diene (Fold-change [FC] 2.08), 1,3,3-trimethyl-2-oxabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (FC 3.86), propan-2-ol (FC 2.10). All six symptomatic patients achieved symptomatic remission (P = 0.03). Fecal calprotectin at baseline was 292 [176-527] μg/g and at week 5 was 205 [148-310] μg/g (P = 0.72). Well tolerated and accepted, the MPD achieved targeted changes in intakes and fermentation of carbohydrates relative to that of protein. There were signals of improvement in symptoms. These results indicate the need for a randomized-controlled trial. (Trial registration: ACTRN12621000374864; https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12621000374864.aspx).

Use of Standardized Inflammatory Bowel Disease Endoscopy Scores in Clinical Practice.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment targets include mucosal healing based on standardized endoscopic scoring systems. The rates and ease of use of these scoring systems in practice have not been well described. We aimed to assess the rates and factors associated with the use of IBD endoscopic scoring systems in practice from IBD LIVE attendees. IBD Live is an international case-based conference focusing on the management of patients with IBD. We created a web-based survey consisting of 38 questions on the frequency and ease of use of various IBD endoscopic scores. This survey was emailed to the IBD Live listserv in March 2022 with a second email sent 14 days later. We included only respondents who are currently performing endoscopy. Continuous variables were analyzed using an unpaired student's t-test. Categorical variables were analyzed using Pearson's chi-square test. There were 65 responses out of 170 (38.2% response rate) regular attendees. Eleven responses were excluded (4 with no response on the use of endoscopy scores, and 7 were not performing endoscopy). Of the respondents, 72.2% are from the United States, 70.4% are adult gastroenterologists, 53.9% in academic practice, and 40.7% in practice for ≥15 years. Of the endoscopy scores used ≥50% of the time, 74.1% were using the Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES), 72.3% using the Rutgeerts Score, 61.2% using the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease, and 28.6% using the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index. Attending IBD LIVE ≥ monthly (P = .028), attending an IBD conference at least every 2 years (P = .020), and having the scoring system incorporated into the endoscopy documentation software (P = .002) were associated with more consistent use of the MES. Attending IBD Live at least monthly (P = .026), having an IBD volume of ≥50% (P = .011), and attending an IBD conference at least every 2 years (P = .004) was associated with more frequent use of the Rutgeerts score. There were no factors that increased the use of other endoscopic scores. The MES and the Rutgeerts score are more commonly used with much lower rates of use of endoscopic scores for Crohn's disease and pouchitis. The use of these endoscopy scores is more common among those who regularly attend IBD conferences, have higher volume IBD practices, and have these scoring systems incorporated into endoscopy software. Further evaluation of barriers to use and ways to improve utilization of endoscopic scoring for Crohn's disease and pouchitis is needed.

Vedolizumab for the Treatment of Chronic Pouchitis

BackgroundApproximately half the patients with ulcerative colitis who undergo restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) will subsequently have pouchitis, and among those patients, one fifth will have chronic pouchitis.MethodsWe conducted a phase 4, double-blind, randomized trial to evaluate vedolizumab in adult patients in whom chronic pouchitis had developed after undergoing IPAA for ulcerative colitis. Patients were assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive vedolizumab intravenously at a dose of 300 mg or placebo on day 1 and at weeks 2, 6, 14, 22, and 30. All the patients received concomitant ciprofloxacin from weeks 1 to 4. The primary end point was modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (mPDAI)–defined remission (an mPDAI score of ≤4 and a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points in the mPDAI total score; scores range from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe pouchitis) at week 14. The mPDAI is based on clinical symptoms and endoscopic findings. Other efficacy end points included mPDAI-defined remission at week 34, mPDAI-defined response (a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points in the mPDAI score) at weeks 14 and 34, and PDAI-defined remission (a PDAI score of ≤6 and a reduction from baseline of ≥3 points; scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating more severe pouchitis) at weeks 14 and 34. The PDAI is based on clinical symptoms, endoscopic findings, and histologic findings.ResultsAmong the 102 patients who underwent randomization, the incidence of mPDAI-defined remission at week 14 was 31% (16 of 51 patients) with vedolizumab and 10% (5 of 51 patients) with placebo (difference, 21 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5 to 38; P=0.01). Differences in favor of vedolizumab over placebo were also seen with respect to mPDAI-defined remission at week 34 (difference, 17 percentage points; 95% CI, 0 to 35), mPDAI-defined response at week 14 (difference, 30 percentage points; 95% CI, 8 to 48) and at week 34 (difference, 22 percentage points; 95% CI, 2 to 40), and PDAI-defined remission at week 14 (difference, 25 percentage points; 95% CI, 8 to 41) and at week 34 (difference, 19 percentage points; 95% CI, 2 to 37). Serious adverse events occurred in 3 of 51 patients (6%) in the vedolizumab group and in 4 of 51 patients (8%) in the placebo group.ConclusionsTreatment with vedolizumab was more effective than placebo in inducing remission in patients who had chronic pouchitis after undergoing IPAA for ulcerative colitis. (Funded by Takeda; EARNEST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02790138; EudraCT number, 2015-003472-78.)

Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Acute Pouchitis.

Pouchitis occurs in up to 80% of patients after total proctocolectomy (TPC) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and has been associated with microbial and host-related immunological factors. We hypothesized that a more robust immune response at the time of colectomy, manifested by acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), may be associated with subsequent acute pouchitis. This was a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients with UC or indeterminate colitis complicated by medically refractory disease or dysplasia who underwent TPC with IPAA at Mount Sinai Hospital between 2008 and 2017 and at least 1 subsequent pouchoscopy. Acute pouchitis was defined according to the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index. Cox regression was used to assess unadjusted relationships between hypothesized risk factors and acute pouchitis. A total of 416 patients met inclusion criteria. Of the 165 (39.7%) patients who underwent urgent colectomy, 77 (46.7%) were admitted with ASUC. Acute pouchitis occurred in 228 (54.8%) patients a median of 1.3 (interquartile range, 0.6-3.1) years after the final surgical stage. On multivariable analysis, ASUC (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.17) and a greater number of biologics precolectomy (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.06-2.31) were associated with an increased probability of acute pouchitis, while older age at colectomy (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99) was associated with a decreased probability. Time to pouchitis was significantly less in patients admitted with ASUC compared with those not (P = .002). A severe UC disease phenotype at the time of colectomy was associated with an increased probability of acute pouchitis.

The efficacy of probiotics on the prevention of pouchitis for patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: A meta-analysis.

To date, a few studies indicated that probiotics are beneficial to pouchitis, but no meta-analyses summarized the outcomes of probiotics in pouchitis in detail. This meta-analysis discusses probiotics in the prevention of pouchitis for patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and the relationship between probiotics preventive effect and the duration of therapy and history. PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception until February 2022. Risk ratio (RR), mean difference (MD) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3. The subgroup analysis was also performed to explore the agent for influencing outcomes. A total of 8 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The incidence of pouchitis in probiotics was significantly lower than that in the control (RR = 0.19, 95%CI [0.12, 0.32], P⁢ï⁢¼⁢ 0.00001), and the PDAI (pouchitis disease activity index) in probiotics was also significantly lower (MD =-5.65, 95%CI [-9.48, -1.83]). After the subgroup analysis, we found that probiotics work better in the short-term (RR = 0.12, 95%CI [0.04, 0.40], P= 0.0004), but may not achieve the desired effect in the long-term (RR = 1.20, 95%CI [0.40, 3.60], P= 0.75). Probiotics are beneficial in the prevention of pouchitis after IPAA, especially in the short-term.

Curable leakage in stapled IPAA has little effect on the long-term pouch function.

This study aimed to evaluate the frequency and grade of anastomotic leakage (AL) in stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and its long-term impact on the pouch functions. A longitudinal cohort study was conducted on UC patients who underwent stapled IPAA at Yokohama City University Medical Center between 2007 and 2018. The diagnosis and grading of AL were performed in accordance with the recommendations of the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. We assessed the functional pouch rate, late complication, pouch survival rate, bowel function (bowel movements per day, soiling, spotting, difficulty in distinguishing feces from flatus) and pouch inflammation (pouchitis disease activity index; PDAI) in the long-term period. Two hundred seventy-six patients were analyzed. Twenty-three (8.3%; grade B/C; 13/10) patients were diagnosed with AL, but a functional pouch was achieved in all the twenty-three patients. Anastomotic stricture was significantly more common in patients with AL (AL group) than in patients without AL (non-AL group; AL/non-AL: 13.0/3.2%, p = 0.020). There were no differences in other late complications. Furthermore, the pouch survival rate did not differ between the AL and non-AL groups (100.0/97.9%/10years, p = 0.494). There were no differences between the groups in bowel movements per day, spotting, soling, difficulty in distinguishing feces from flatus, or PDAI postoperatively. Curable AL may not affect late complications (except anastomotic stricture), pouch survival, the bowel function, or pouch inflammation over the long term. Perioperative management to prevent the severity of AL is as important as preventing its occurrence.

OP08 Mucosal healing with vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease patients with chronic pouchitis: Evidence from EARNEST, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Abstract Background Mucosal healing (MH) is an important treatment goal for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Vedolizumab (VDZ), a gut-selective anti-lymphocyte trafficking agent, has shown potential to achieve MH.1,2 EARNEST, a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of VDZ in chronic pouchitis,3 offers a robust dataset systematically collected from the inflamed pouch mucosa to further explore the impact of VDZ treatment on MH. Methods EARNEST evaluated intravenous VDZ (300 mg) vs placebo (PBO) administered at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14, 22, and 30, in adult patients (pts) with active chronic pouchitis despite antibiotic therapy after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Endoscopic imaging was captured and centrally read at baseline, Week (W) 14, and W34. Total ulceration and SES-CD (modified to apply to a single segment) were evaluated. Microscopic inflammation was also evaluated using the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI) histological component. Pre-specified exploratory endpoints included changes in total ulceration and SES-CD remission (score ≤2); MH was defined post-hoc as SES-CD=0 plus PDAI histology score ≤1 (none/mild polymorphic nuclear leukocyte infiltration and no ulceration). Fecal calprotectin (FCP) levels were explored by MH status. PDAI remission (score &amp;lt;7 and ≥3 point-reduction from baseline) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) remission (score ≥170) were assessed in pts with/without MH at W14. Results In total, 98 pts had endoscopic evaluations (VDZ n=48; PBO n=50). Ulcers/erosions were higher in VDZ pts at baseline with a greater reduction at W14 and W34 with VDZ vs PBO (Table 1). More pts treated with VDZ vs PBO achieved reduction in ulcerated surface area, complete absence of ulceration/erosions and SES-CD remission. At W14, 7/42 (16.7%) pts had MH on VDZ vs 1/40 (2.5%) on PBO. All 7 VDZ pts with MH at W14 were in PDAI remission at W14 and W34; 6/7 (85.7%) pts achieved IBDQ remission at W14 and 5/7 (71.4%) achieved IBDQ remission at both W14 and W34. Of the 35 VDZ-treated pts without MH at W14, 11/35 (31.4%) achieved PDAI remission at W14, 11/35 (31.4%) at W34, and 9/35 (25.7%) at both W14 and W34; 13/35 (37.1%) achieved IBDQ remission at W14, 17/35 (48.6%) at W34, and 12/35 (34.3%) at both W14 and W34. MH was associated with FCP ≤250 µg/g while ~40-60% of pts without MH had FCP &amp;gt;250 µg/g (Table 2). Conclusion VDZ was associated with better control of markers of inflammation vs PBO, based upon improvements in endoscopic/histologic outcomes in the pouch mucosa, as well as improved outcomes reported by pts. These effects of VDZ in the pouch mucosa are consistent with those observed in the wider patient population with IBD.

P205 Impact of histologic disease activity on long-term outcomes in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis

Abstract Background Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) can incur in several complications like pouchitis leading to the need of immunosuppressive therapy, hospitalization and pouch failure. Unlike non-operated UC patients, therapeutic goals are an unmet need in UC-IPAA patients and the impact of the histologic activity on the development of complications is unknown. The aim of the study was to assess the association between histology and the risk of long-term negative outcomes in UC subjects with IPAA. Methods This is a single-center, retrospective study which included UC adult patients with IPAA undergoing at least one pouchscopy with biopsies in the pouch body after ileostomy closure. Pouch biopsies were blindly reviewed by a gastrointestinal pathologist with expertise in IBD. Histologic disease remission was defined as a Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI) histology subscore £ 1. Negative outcomes were: IPAA related complications (acute or chronic pouchitis, hospitalization, pouch failure) and escalation of medical therapy (start of immunosuppressive or biologics). Both descriptive and inferential statistical analyses carried out Results A total of 66 patients were included (male n=37; 56,1%) of whom 40,9% (n=27) had histological activity at the baseline pouchscopy. The characteristics of the study population are represented in table 1. The median time of follow up was 38,5 months (range 12-151). During the study period, 27 patients (40,9%) developed acute pouchitis and 10 patients (15,2%) chronic pouchitis. Thirty-nine subjects (59,1%) required antibiotic therapy while 8 subjects required systemic steroids (12,1%). Furthermore, 15 patients (22,7%) started immunomodulatory therapy with either azathioprine or biologic agents. Six patients (9,1%) needed pouch-related hospitalization and 1 patients (1,5%) experienced pouch failure. Chronic pouchitis and the need of immunosuppressive/biology therapy was observed more frequently in patients with pouch histologic activity (29,6% vs. 5,1%, and 40,7% vs. 10,3%, respectively) (P&amp;lt;0.05). After adjusting for risk factors for pouchitis, the presence of histologic activity remained an independent risk factor for developing acute pouchitis (OR 4.10, 95% CI 1.39-12.04; P= 0.010), chronic pouchitis (OR 8.51, 95% CI 1.51-47.80, P=0.015) and the need for immunosuppressive or biologic therapy (OR 6.98, 95% CI 1.69-28.80; P=0.007). Conclusion Histologic activity was associated with an increased risk of developing both acute and chronic pouchitis and with the need for immunosuppressive/biologic therapy. Future research will clarify whether histologic remission might be considered as a therapeutic target for UC-IPAA patients developing pouchitis.

P910 Emerging role of IL-33/ST2 and Gut Microbiota axis in the inflammatory process of ulcerative colitis patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Abstract Background IL-33/ST2 axis and gut microbiota are important factors in the pathogenesis of IBD with a potential reciprocal influence. IL-33/ST2 axis controls the mucosal healing process during intestinal inflammation. Pouchitis, after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, is the most common complication. We aimed to explore the potential correlation between mucosal cytokines and gut microbiota in the inflammatory process of pouchitis. Methods 23 patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were enrolled. 13 showed pouchitis and 10 a normal pouch. Mucosal samples were collected from the afferent ileal loop and from the pouch. Multiplex analysis for cytokines was performed. ELISA, western blot and IHC were run to assess IL-33/ST2 axis. Microbiota was analyzed by 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon pyrosequencing. Pouchitis Disease Activity Index and Pouchitis Histological Score were calculated. Multivariate analyses were run to generate transcriptional interaction networks and identify biomarkers for patients with inflamed pouches. Results IL-1Ra, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1a, MIP-1b were increased in the inflamed pouch vs. normal pouch. No differences were registered in samples from the afferent ileal loop. In pouchitis, IL-7 resulted reduced in the inflamed pouch vs. the ileal loop. In normal pouch, no differences were recorded. In pouchitis, IL-33 and ST2 protein levels were significantly reduced in the pouch vs. the ileal loop and resulted decreased vs. normal pouch. Full-length, bioactive IL33, ST2L and sST2 were expressed in all experimental groups; the cleaved, less active form of IL33 was increased only in pouchitis. IL-33 and ST2 stainings were less intense within the inflamed and ulcerated mucosa of pouchitis compared to the normal pouch and in close proximity to areas of re-epithelialization. Microbiota analysis showed a decreased biodiversity in pouchitis vs. normal pouch (both at pouch and ileal loop level). Lower levels of Verrucomicrobia and increased abundance of Actinobacteria were recorded in inflamed pouch vs normal pouch. In pouchitis, the ileal loop and the pouch showed decreased levels of Akkermansia muciniphila and augmented abundance of Collinsella vs. samples from the normal pouch. In pouchitis, multivariate analyses evidenced a significant inverse correlation between Collinsella e Collinsella aereofaciens abundance and ST2 levels. Conclusion Pouchitis and normal pouch are characterized by divergent inflammatory molecular pathways and microbial populations with a specific pattern between the pouch and afferent ileal loop. Our results suggest a potential role for IL-33/ST2 and gut microbiota axis in driving the gut mucosal wound healing in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

P521 Effectiveness of ustekinumab as therapy for chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis

Abstract Background Up to 10% of patients with ulcerative colitis who undergo a proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, will develop chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis (CARP). As there is a large unmet need in the management of these patients, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of induction and maintenance therapy with ustekinumab (UST). Methods We performed a prospective, multicentre, open-label study of patients with CARP (mPDAI ≥5 with an endoscopic subscore ≥2) . Patients received a weight-range-based infusion of UST at baseline (~6mg/kg) and subcutaneous injections of 90mg UST every 8 weeks thereafter until week 48. Patients underwent a pouchoscopy at baseline, week 16 and week 48, with assessment of the modified pouchitis disease activity index (mPDAI). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving steroid-free remission (mPDAI &amp;lt;5 and reduction by ≥2 points from baseline) at week 16. For this abstract we focus on the secondary endpoints at week 48 including the proportion of patients achieving steroid-free remission and response (reduction of mPDAI by ≥2 points from baseline) using a non-responder imputation. For patients still continuing UST at week 48, we evaluated the change in symptomatic and endoscopic mPDAI subscore, C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin levels compared to baseline. Descriptive statistics and paired nonparametric tests (Wilcoxon signed-rank) of changes from baseline were performed. Results We enrolled 22 patients (59% male, median age 42.2 years, median time after surgery 8.2 years). Twelve (54.5%) patients had previously been treated with biologics for CARP (table 1). At week 16, steroid-free remission was achieved in 27.3% of patients. At week 48, steroid-free remission was achieved in 36.4% and response in 54.5% of patients. In the 14 patients continuing UST at week 48, a significant decrease in total mPDAI (4 (1.8-7.3) vs. 8 (8-10), p&amp;lt;0.001), clinical subscore (1 (0-2.3) vs. 3 (2-4), p=0.001), and endoscopic subscore (3 (1.8-4.3) vs. 6 (4.8-6), p=0.001) was observed compared to baseline (figure 1). Faecal calprotectin (129 (80-344) vs. 229 (139-541) mg/kg, p=0.17) and CRP (2.5 (1.3-4.4) vs. 3.8 (1.6-9.3) mg/L, p=0.09) levels did however not decrease significantly (figure 2 and 3). Three serious adverse events (hospitalization for subobstruction, worsening pouchitis and choledocholithiasis) were recorded, but were not considered related to UST. Conclusion In this open-label pilot study in patients with CARP, maintenance therapy with UST showed a clinical and endoscopic effect in half of the patients, but was not associated with changes in inflammatory biomarkers. These promising results warrant confirmation in a placebo-controlled study with UST for the treatment of CARP.

Fecal calprotectin as an indicator in risk stratification of pouchitis following ileal pouch–anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis

Background Pouchitis is the most common complication following restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC). Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a noninvasive indicator of the intestinal inflammatory status. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical value of the FC concentration for the diagnosis and risk assessment of pouchitis. Patients and methods This retrospective study involved patients who underwent IPAA for UC at Tianjin Medical University General Hospital from January 2015 to January 2019. The patients were categorized into pouchitis and non-pouchitis groups based on their Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI) score. Laboratory indicators, including the FC concentration, were collected from both groups. Results Sixty-six patients with UC after IPAA were included in the study and divided into the non-pouchitis group (n = 40) and pouchitis group (n = 26). The correlation coefficient between the FC concentration and the PDAI score was 0.651 (p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the FC cut-off value for predicting pouchitis was 579.60 μg/g (area under the curve, 0.938). The patients were then divided into three subgroups according to their PDAI score (0–2, 3–6, and ≥7), and significant differences in the FC concentration were found among the three subgroups. The best FC cut-off value for predicting a high risk of pouchitis (PDAI score of 3–6) was 143.25 μg/g (area under the curve, 0.876). Conclusions FC is a useful biomarker in patients with pouchitis. Patients are advised to regularly undergo FC measurement to monitor for pouchitis. An FC concentration in the range of 143.25–579.60 μg/g is predictive of a high risk for pouchitis, and further examination and preventive treatment are necessary in such patients. KEY MESSAGES Fecal calprotectin can be used to quantify pouch inflammation. Fecal calprotectin can be used to predict a high risk of pouchitis.

Risk Factors and Quality of Life in Patients with Diffuse Pouchitis After Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis According to the Chicago Classification for J Pouch: a Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study in China

BackgroundPouchitis is a common late complication in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who undergo ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA). The heterogeneous nature of the clinical and endoscopic presentations could affect the evaluation of therapeutic interventions for pouchitis. Thus, identifying the risk factors and clinical outcomes of pouch inflammation at different sites and severity is becoming increasingly important for colorectal surgeons. MethodsData on patients who underwent IPAA January from 2008 to June 2022 in our three pouch centers affiliated with the China UC Pouch Center Union were retrospectively collected. Pouchitis was categorized as a different phenotype according to the Chicago Classification. J pouches were classified into short (14 ± 2 cm) and long pouches (22 ± 2 cm) according to the distribution of ileal pouch length in our institute. ResultsAltogether, 143 patients with a median follow-up time of 5.0 years (interquartile range: 2.0–8.0) were enrolled. Among them, 41 patients (28.7%) developed pouchitis and 32 patients (78%) had diffuse inflammation of the pouch. Patients with diffuse pouchitis had a higher pouchitis disease activity index and more seriously impaired improvement of long-term quality of life than those with pouch phenotypes. A short J pouch, recurrent UC, and preoperative high white blood cell count were independent risk factors for diffuse pouchitis. Furthermore, a short J pouch could effectively predict the occurrence of diffuse pouchitis with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.614, a sensitivity of 62.5%, and a specificity of 60.4% (p = 0.049) and significantly decreased the overall diffuse pouchitis-free survival compared to a long J pouch (p = 0.0002). ConclusionDiffuse pouchitis is a common phenotype of pouchitis that seriously impairs long-term prognosis. For colorectal surgeons, decision-making regarding pouch construction with an appropriate length should be considered to prevent the development of diffuse pouchitis. Graphical Abstract [Display omitted]

Associations between Pouchitis and Fecal Calprotectin after Restorative Proctocolectomy in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

Introduction: Recently, fecal calprotectin has been identified and used as an assessment tool for the confirmation of disease activity in ulcerative colitis. Although a meta-analysis suggested the usefulness of fecal calprotectin for the assessment of pouchitis, the number of participants was still insufficient. Therefore, we prospectively measured fecal calprotectin levels during pouchoscopy and analyzed their associations with pouchitis. Methods: Patients who underwent pouchoscopy after total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis were included. Fecal samples were collected for the measurement of calprotectin during pouchoscopy. Patients either with or without suspicious pouchitis were included. Pouchitis was defined as a modified pouchitis disease activity index (m-PDAI) score of ≥5. The associations between the development of pouchitis and the m-PDAI score and fecal calprotectin and serum markers, including C-related protein, albumin, and white blood cells, were assessed. Results: A total of 170 patients were included. Seventy-two patients were diagnosed with pouchitis with an m-PDAI score of 7.3 ± 1.5. The values of fecal calprotectin were 1,500 ± 1,544 μg/g in patients with pouchitis and 259 ± 402 μg/g in patients without pouchitis (p < 0.01). The correlation coefficient between calprotectin and the m-PDAI score was significant (r² = 0.279, p < 0.001). The cutoff value of fecal calprotectin in receiver operating characteristic analysis was 246 μg/g (area under curve 0.85, sensitivity 83.9%, specificity 71.0%). Fecal samples were able to be collected from 6 patients. The levels of fecal calprotectin significantly decreased from 2,101.3 ± 880.3 μg/g to 284.2 ± 96.9 μg/g in response to the treatment. Conclusions: Elevated fecal calprotectin appeared to be significantly correlated with pouchitis. We should consider the alteration of this marker during treatments in further studies.

Inflammatory bowel disease-specific findings are common morphological changes in the ileal pouch with ulcerative colitis

Why inflammation is common in ileal pouches with ulcerative colitis (UC) is unclear. We therefore clarified the morphological changes in pouches and afferent limbs (AL) of patients with UC and explored the relationship between these findings. We evaluated the morphological findings (histological and endoscopic inflammation as the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index [PDAI] histology subscore [hPDAI] and endoscopy subscore [ePDAI], inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]-specific findings using the IBD score [SIBD], colonic metaplasia using the colonic metaplasia score [CMS], and goblet cell [GC] ratio) in the pouch and AL of patients with UC. A total of 261 pouchoscopies were analyzed. The pouch body had a higher hPDAI (p < 0.001), SIBD (p < 0.001), CMS (p < 0.001), GC ratio (p < 0.001), and ePDAI (p < 0.001) than the AL. The hPDAI was correlated with the SIBD (Spearman’s coefficient r = 0.538; p < 0.001), CMS (r = 0.687; p < 0.001), and the ePDAI (r = 0.552; p < 0.001), but not with GC ratio (r = 0.175; p < 0.001) or the pouch usage duration (r = −0.057; p = 0.107). The incidence of histological inflammation was higher in specimens showing basal plasmacytosis with severe mononuclear cell infiltration (BP) than in those without BP (odds ratio [OR] 6.790, p < 0.001), BP was commonly found with crypt hyperplasia (OR 3.414, p < 0.001) and the crypt length correlated with neutrophil infiltration (r = 0.469; p < 0.001). Histological inflammation, colonic metaplasia, the GC ratio, endoscopic inflammation, and IBD-specific findings were commonly present in the pouch than in the AL. Histological inflammation occurs with IBD-specific findings and colonic metaplasia, and these signify endoscopic inflammation.