Carvedilol is a new ,a-blocking agent that also possesses vasodilating properties (Sponer et al. 1987). Clinical studies confirm its efficacy in the treatment of hypertension and angina and indicate that carvedilol may have a significant advantage over standard ,8-blockers (Eggertsen et al. 1984; Heber et al. 1987; Kaski et al. 1985; Lahiri et al. 1987; Rodrigues et al. 1986). However, the mechanism by which carvedilol exerts vasodilatation remains to be established. The objective of this study was to examine the pharmacological effects of carvedilol on isolated canine coronary artery. The left circumflex coronary artery rings were isolated from dogs and mounted for isometric tension measurement by methods described previously (Hattori et al. 1986). The rings were allowed to equilibrate for 1 hour in the bathing solution. After the accommodation period , the preparations were tested either by exposing to 40 mmol/L K+ or by adding 10 Jlmol/L PGF2" until the response to either agent became constant, and then the experiments were commenced. Carvedilol competitively antagonised the relaxation induced by isoprenaline in the preparations precontracted with 40 mmol/L K+, and its pA2 value was 9.70 ± 0.08 (n = 8). The pA2 value of propranolol was 8.82 ± 0.14 (n = 6); thus, carvedilol was more potent than propranolol in blocking the coronary ,a-adrenoceptors. Carvedilol at concentrations greater than 3 Jlmol/L was found to inhibit significantly the contractile response to high potassium (K+). The inhibitory effect of carvedilol on the KCl-induced contractions was more prominent than its effect on the response to PGF2", Furthermore, carvedilol (0.1-30.0 Jlmol/L) relaxed the rings precontracted with the Ca2+ channel agonist Bay K 8644. The concentration-response curve for the contractile response to Bay K 8644 was shifted downwards by pretreatment with carvedilol in a concentration-dependent manner. The drug also caused a concentration-dependent inhibitory effect on the rhythmic contractions produced by 10 mmol/L 4-aminopyridine in a similar way to the well-known Ca2+ channel antagonists such as verapamil and cinnarizine. On the other hand, carvedilol was ineffective in suppressing the contractions induced by 20 Jlmol/L PGF2" in Ca2+-free physiologicalsalt solution and by 5 Jlmol/L A23187, a Ca2+ ionophore. These results indicate that carvedilol can exert a vasodilating action, possibly by inhibiting Ca2+ influx through potential-operated Ca2+ channels. However, the concentrations of carvedilol required to produce the direct vasodilating activity are much higher than those required for its ,a-blockingaction.