You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Markers (II)1 Apr 20132238 ERG AS A POTENTIAL BIOMARKER FOR PROSTATE CANCER MAY BENEFIT EUROPEAN AMERICAN MEN BUT NOT AFRICAN AMERICAN MEN Isaac Powell, Greg Dyson, and Aliccia Bollig-Fischer Isaac PowellIsaac Powell Detroit, MI More articles by this author , Greg DysonGreg Dyson Detroit, MI More articles by this author , and Aliccia Bollig-FischerAliccia Bollig-Fischer Detroit, MI More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.2147AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES ERG (avian v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog) gene rearrangement and over-expression with potential functional consequences has been detected in 40-50% of men with prostate cancer. The utilization of ERG as an additional biomarker to prostate specific antigen (PSA) is being strongly considered. Evidence suggests that ERG expression is associated with disease progression. However, the evidence is controversial and primarily relies on studies including only European or European American men (EAM) as subjects. A relatively limited study in fact reports a low frequency percentage of ERG protein expression African American men (AAM). Here we are reporting on a larger diverse population of men with prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded archived tumor samples from radical prostatectomy were included in the study. An Illumina DASL bead array was used to measure ERG expression in 639 tumor-derived DNA samples (270 AAM, 369 EAM). RESULTS A t-test using the Satterthwaite approximation of degrees of freedom was then performed comparing ERG expression in AAM to EAM, which demonstrated that ERG was more highly expressed overall in the EAM population. Furthermore, density plots display two populations among AAM and EAM, one subpopulation demonstrating low ERG expression and another with significantly high-level expression. For EAM, 40% show high-level expression of ERG. However, among AAM only 14% show high levels of ERG expression. CONCLUSIONS The gene-level result from the current analysis showed that ERG expression was significantly greater in PCa from EAM compared to AAM; suggesting that the potential utility of ERG as a biomarker is limited, and may be specific to EAM. © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 189Issue 4SApril 2013Page: e917-e918 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Isaac Powell Detroit, MI More articles by this author Greg Dyson Detroit, MI More articles by this author Aliccia Bollig-Fischer Detroit, MI More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...