Potent CYP3A4 Inducer Research Articles

Understanding CYP3A4 and P-gp mediated drug-drug interactions through PBPK modeling - Case example of pralsetinib.

Pralsetinib, a potent and selective inhibitor of oncogenic RET fusion and RET mutant proteins, is a substrate of the drug metabolizing enzyme CYP3A4 and a substrate of the efflux transporter P-gp based on invitro data. Therefore, its pharmacokinetics (PKs) may be affected by co-administration of potent CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers, P-gp inhibitors, and combined CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitors. With the frequent overlap between CYP3A4 and P-gp substrates/inhibitors, pralsetinib is a challenging and representative example of the need to more quantitatively characterize transporter-enzyme interplay. A physiologically-based PK (PBPK) model for pralsetinib was developed to understand the victim drug-drug interaction (DDI) risk for pralsetinib. The key parameters driving the magnitude of pralsetinib DDIs, the P-gp intrinsic clearance and the fraction metabolized by CYP3A4, were determined from PBPK simulations that best captured observed DDIs from three clinical studies. Sensitivity analyses and scenario simulations were also conducted to ensure these key parameters were determined with sound mechanistic rationale based on current knowledge, including the worst-case scenarios. The verified pralsetinib PBPK model was then applied to predict the effect of other inhibitors and inducers on the PKs of pralsetinib. This work highlights the challenges in understanding DDIs when enzyme-transporter interplay occurs, and demonstrates an important strategy for differentiating enzyme/transporter contributions to enable PBPK predictions for untested scenarios and to inform labeling.

St. John's wort formulations induce rat CYP3A23-3A1 independent of their hyperforin content.

The pregnane X receptor (PXR) is a ligand activated regulator of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A enzymes. Among the ligands of human PXR is hyperforin, a constituent of St John's wort (SJW) extracts and potent inducer of human CYP3A4. It was the aim of this study to compare the effect of hyperforin and SJW formulations controlled for its content on CYP3A23-3A1 in rats. Hyperiplant® was used as it contains a high hyperforin content and Rebalance® because it is controlled for a low hyperforin content. In silico analysis revealed a weak hyperforin-rPXR binding affinity, which was further supported in cell-based reporter gene assays showing no hyperforin-mediated reporter activation in presence of rPXR. However, cellular exposure to Hyperiplant® and Rebalance® transactivated the CYP3A-reporter 3.8 fold and 2.8 fold, respectively, and they induced Cyp3a23-3a1 mRNA expression in rat hepatoma cells compared to control 48-fold and 18-fold, respectively. In Wistar rats treated for 10 days with 400 mg/kg of Hyperiplant® we observed 1.8-times the Cyp3a23-3a1 mRNA expression, a 2.6-fold higher CYP3A23-3A1 protein amount and a 1.6-fold increase in activity compared to control. For Rebalance® we only observed a 1.8-fold hepatic increase of CYP3A23-3A1 protein compared to control animals. Even though there are differing effects on rCyp3a23-3a1/CYP3A23-3A1 in rat liver reflecting the hyperforin content of the SJW extracts, the modulation is most likely not linked to an interaction of hyperforin with rPXR. Significance Statement Treatment with St John's wort (SJW) has been reported to affect CYP3A expression and activity in rats. Our comparative study further supports this finding but shows that the PXR-ligand hyperforin is not the driving force for changes in rat CYP3A23-3A1 expression and function in vivo and in vitro Importantly, CYP3A induction mimics findings in humans but our results suggest that another so far unknown constituent of SJW is responsible for the expression and function modifying effects in rat liver.

Clinical assessment of gepotidacin (GSK2140944) as a victim and perpetrator of drug-drug interactions via CYP3A metabolism and transporters.

Gepotidacin is a novel triazaacenaphthylene antibiotic in phase III development. Based on nonclinical in vitro characterization of gepotidacin metabolism, two phase I studies were conducted in healthy participants to investigate clinical drug-drug interactions (DDIs). We assessed gepotidacin as a DDI victim with a potent cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4/P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor (itraconazole), potent CYP3A4 inducer (rifampicin), and nonspecific organic cation transporter (OCT)/multidrug and toxic extrusion transporter (MATE) renal transport inhibitor (cimetidine) via single doses of gepotidacin before and after co-administration with multiple doses of the modulator drugs. Gepotidacin DDI perpetrator potential for P-gp inhibition (digoxin) and CYP3A4 inhibition (midazolam) was evaluated via single doses of the two-drug cocktail without and with gepotidacin. The DDI magnitudes were interpreted based on area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). A weak DDI (AUC increase 48%-50%) was observed for gepotidacin co-administered with itraconazole. A clinically significant decrease in gepotidacin plasma AUC (52%) was observed with rifampicin coadministration, indicating a moderate DDI. There was no DDI for gepotidacin with cimetidine; a unique biomarker approach showed increased serum creatinine (24%), decreased renal clearance of creatinine (21%), and N1-methylnicotinamide (39%), which confirmed extensive MATE inhibition and partial OCT2 inhibition. Gepotidacin was not a P-gp DDI perpetrator, although the maximum plasma concentration of digoxin increased (53%) and is potentially clinically relevant given its narrow therapeutic index. Gepotidacin demonstrated weak CYP3A4 inhibition with midazolam (<2-fold AUC increase). There were no new safety-risk profile findings. These results will inform the safe and efficacious clinical use of gepotidacin when co-administered with other drugs.

Effect of a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor and inducer on the pharmacokinetics of senaparib (IMP4297) in healthy volunteers: A drug-drug interaction study.

A phase I open-label study assessed the effect of multiple oral doses of a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor (itraconazole) and inducer (rifampicin) on the pharmacokinetic profile of a single oral dose of senaparib, a novel, highly potent poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1/2 inhibitor and CYP3A4 substrate, in Chinese healthy male volunteers (HMV). Adult HMV were enrolled to the itraconazole or rifampicin group (n = 16 each). In Period 1, all participants received a single oral dose of senaparib 40 mg (itraconazole group) or 100 mg (rifampicin group). In Period 2, the same dose was coadministered with itraconazole (200 mg) and rifampicin (600 mg), respectively. The primary endpoints were senaparib exposure parameters. Coadministration with itraconazole significantly increased exposure of senaparib and decreased that of its major metabolites M9 and M14. Maximum plasma senaparib concentration (Cmax ) was increased by ~79% and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) increased by ~2.8-fold. Coadministration with rifampicin significantly reduced the Cmax and AUC of senaparib by ~59 and 83%, respectively. The Cmax for both M9 and M14 was slightly increased, although AUC was decreased. All treatment-emergent adverse events were grade ≤2, regardless of the treatment administered. In Chinese HMV, the exposure of senaparib was significantly increased when coadministered with itraconazole and significantly decreased when coadministered with rifampicin. It is recommended to avoid concomitant use of senaparib and strong inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4.

604. Effect of rifabutin in dolutegravir dosing: a case series

Abstract Background Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected people worldwide. Patients with HIV who have latent TB are 20-30 times more likely to develop active TB. Integrated antiretroviral therapy (ART) early in the treatment for tuberculosis is recommended due to improved morbidity and mortality, however, there can be serious drug interactions. Rifamycins are potent inducers of the CYP3A4 isoform, which can cause sub-therapeutic concentrations of anti-retroviral drugs, among these, rifabutin (RBN) is a less potent inducer of CYP3A4. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies done on healthy adults showed that rifampin decreased dolutegravir (DTG) concentrations by more than 50 % whereas RBN decreased it by 30%. RBN has been preferred given that its favorable pharmacokinetic and toxicity profile. Currently there are no studies examining the use of RBN and DTG in co-infected persons. This is a case series of 4 co-infected patients receiving both agents who underwent PK analysis. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients in the respiratory care unit (RCU) at Jackson Memorial Hospital in Miami. We included adult patients, admitted to the RCU, with a concomitant diagnosis of HIV and active TB disease who received DTG and RBN, and for which DTG and RBN plasma concentrations were measured for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). A non-compartmental analysis was performed and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was calculated for DTG and RBN. Results We report 4 patients (Figure 1) that met criteria and underwent PK analysis. All patients with TB who were treated with RBN had low concentrations of DTG, requiring higher doses of DTG (Table 1 &amp; 2). After adjustments based on PK analysis, there was evidence of a favorable response to treatment in 2 patients, with a less than robust in the 2 others. Adequate suppression of viral load could not be determined for 3 of the patients because of the short observation time. Figure 1:Timelines of patients describing admission and HIV and tuberculosis treatment providedDTG, dolutegravir. RFB, rifabutin. VL, viral load. AFB, Acid fast bacilli. LAD, lymphadenopathy. TAF, Tenofovir alafenamide. FTC, Emtricitabine. TDF, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate. INH, Isoniazid. PYZ, Pyrazinamide. BID, twice a day. QD, daily. IRIS, Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. GU, genitourinary. TB, tuberculosis.Table 1:Patients’ pharmacokinetics of DTGAUCX-Y, area under the concentration-time curve from time X to Y hours; AUC0-tau, area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the end of the dosing interval; DTG, dolutegravir; TDM, therapeutic drug monitoring. a) AUC0-6 was calculated.Table 2:Patients’ pharmacokinetics of RBNAUCX-Y, area under the concentration-time curve from time X to Y hours; AUC0-tau, area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the end of the dosing interval; RBN, Rifabutin; TDM, therapeutic drug monitoring. a) All RBN doses given every 24 hours, b) RBN value was trace and AUC was not calculated. Conclusion All patients with HIV and TB who were treated with RBN had low concentrations of DTG. This case series demonstrates that for optimal concomitant use of rifabutin and dolutegravir it is highly recommended to use TDM. Prospective clinical studies are needed to further determine the PK interactions between RBN and DTG and virologic response to treatment. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Abstract 419: Presence of pulmonary tuberculosis impair survival in advanced EGFR mutation lung adenocarcinoma patients receiving epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Abstract Background Although studies have identified several clinicopathological factors that can predict the response to and survival on epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI), few studies have clearly demonstrated the effect of EGFR-TKI in the treatment of patients with underlying pulmonary disease, such as pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). In addition, cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme, CYP3A4, is involved in the metabolism of gefitinib. Previous study reported that in the presence of the anti-tuberculosis drug rifampicin, a potent CYP3A4 inducer, the geometric mean maximum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of gefitinib were significantly reduced. Thus, we conducted the study to evaluate the impact of PTB on survival for pulmonary adenocarcinoma (PAD) patients that underwent EGFR-TKI treatment. Methods Clinicopathologic data of PAD patients harboring EGFR mutations from the Guangzhou Chest hospital in China between 2017 and 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients receiving EGFR-TKI treatment were divided into PTB and non-PTB groups. The differences in response to EGFR-TKIs and survival between the two groups were assessed. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues were used for the detection of alterations in the EGFR, ALK, ROS1, KRAS, BRAF, RET, MET, HER2, NRAS, and PIK3CA genes. Results A total of 1448 patients with PAD were reviewed. 223 patients (15.40%) had co-existing PTB, and 317 (21.89%) patients had EGFR-mutated tumors. Among the 223 patients with PTB, 21 (9.42%) harboring EGFR mutations (PTB group). From 296 non-PTB patients with EGFR mutations, 43 patients (non-PTB group) were randomly selected for subsequent analysis. The frequency of former smoker (57.14% vs. 13.95%, p=0.001) and poor performance status (23.81% vs. 6.98%, p=0.007) were significantly higher in the PTB group compared with the non-PTB group. After EGFR-TKIs treatment, the objective response rate (ORR, 58.14% vs.47.62%) as well as disease control rate (DCR, 97.67% vs.85.71) were higher in the non-PTB group than in the PTB group, but there was no statistical difference. In the survival analysis, both the median progression-free survival (PFS, 7.47 months vs. 11.77 months, p=0.038) and the overall survival (OS, 13.00 months vs. 20.00 months, p=0.0017) after EGFR-TKIs were significantly shorter in the PTB group than in the non-PTB group. Secondary data analysis showed that, for patients with 19Del mutation, or metastases sites less than 3, or using first-line EGFR-TKI, EGFR-TKIs treatment significantly prolonged the median PFS and OS in patients without PTB. Conclusion Presence of PTB may be associated with more frequent former smoker and poor performance status. PAD patients on EGFR-TKI treatment had a worse survival outcome if patients had co-existing PTB. Citation Format: Yalin Xie, Wei Zhou, An Lei, Zhan Huang, Li Weiwei, Changbin Zhu, Guanshan Zhu, Wenchang Cen. Presence of pulmonary tuberculosis impair survival in advanced EGFR mutation lung adenocarcinoma patients receiving epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 419.

Anaesthesia and orphan disease: A patient with neuromyotonia undergoing single lung ventilation.

Anaesthesia and orphan disease: A patient with neuromyotonia undergoing single lung ventilation.

Alflutinib (AST2818), primarily metabolized by CYP3A4, is a potent CYP3A4 inducer.

Alflutinib (AST2818) is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor that inhibits both EGFR-sensitive mutations and T790M mutations. Previous study has shown that after multiple dosages, alflutinib exhibits nonlinear pharmacokinetics and displays a time- and dose-dependent increase in the apparent clearance, probably due to its self-induction of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme. In this study, we investigated the CYP isozymes involved in the metabolism of alflutinib and evaluated the enzyme inhibition and induction potential of alflutinib and its metabolites. The data showed that alflutinib in human liver microsomes (HLMs) was metabolized mainly by CYP3A4, which could catalyze the formation of AST5902. Alflutinib did not inhibit CYP isozymes in HLMs but could induce CYP3A4 in human hepatocytes. Rifampin is a known strong CYP3A4 inducer and is recommended by the FDA as a positive control in the CYP3A4 induction assay. We found that the induction potential of alflutinib was comparable to that of rifampin. The Emax of CYP3A4 induction by alflutinib in three lots of human hepatocytes were 9.24-, 11.2-, and 10.4-fold, while the fold-induction of rifampin (10 μM) were 7.22-, 19.4- and 9.46-fold, respectively. The EC50 of alflutinib-induced CYP3A4 mRNA expression was 0.25 μM, which was similar to that of rifampin. In addition, AST5902 exhibited much weak CYP3A4 induction potential compared to alflutinib. Given the plasma exposure of alflutinib and AST5902, both are likely to affect the pharmacokinetics of CYP3A4 substrates. Considering that alflutinib is a CYP3A4 substrate and a potent CYP3A4 inducer, drug–drug interactions are expected during alflutinib treatment.

Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interactions with Agents for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

This article provides an overview of the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) for agents prescribed for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Polypharmacy in the treatment of patients with ADHD leads to high exposures to DDIs and possibly adverse safety outcomes. We performed a systematic search of DDI reports for ADHD agents in Embase and Medline. We also searched for agents in the pharmacological pipeline, which include (1) mazindol, molindone and viloxazine, which were previously prescribed for other indications; (2) centanafadine and AR-08, never before approved; and (3) two extracts (Polygala tenuifolia extract and the French maritime pine bark extracts). The identified literature included case reports, cross-sectional, cross-over and placebo-controlled studies of patient cohorts and healthy volunteers. The DDIs were classified as follows: ADHD agents acting as perpetrators, i.e., affecting the clearance of co-prescribed agents (victim drugs), or ADHD agents being the victim drugs, being affected by other agents. Ratios for changes in pharmacokinetic parameters before and after the DDI were used as a rough estimate of the extent of the DDI. Alcohol may increase plasma dextroamphetamine concentrations by presystemic effects. Until studies are done to orient clinicians regarding dosing changes, clinicians need to be aware of the potential for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 inhibitors to increase amphetamine levels, which is equivalent to increasing dosages. Atomoxetine is a wide therapeutic window drug. The CYP2D6 poor metabolizers who do not have CYP2D6 activity had better atomoxetine response, but also an increased risk of adverse effects. CYP2D6 inhibitors have been used to increase atomoxetine response in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers. Guanfacine is mainly metabolized by CYP3A4, which can be induced and inhibited. The package insert recommends that in guanfacine-treated patients, after adding potent CYP3A4 inducers, the guanfacine dose should be doubled; after adding potent CYP3A4 inhibitors the guanfacine dose should be halved. Based on a phenobarbital case report and our experience with CYP3A4-metabolized antipsychotics, these correction factors may be too low. According to two case reports, carbamazepine is a clinically relevant inducer of methylphenidate (MPH). A case series study suggested that MPH may be associated with important elevations in imipramine concentrations. Due to the absence of or limitations in the data, no comments for clinicians can be provided on the pharmacokinetic DDIs for clonidine, centanafadine, mazindol, molindone, AR-08, P. tenuifolia extract and the French maritime pine bark extracts. According to currently available data, clinicians should not expect that ADHD drugs modify each other's serum concentrations. A summary table for clinicians provides our current recommendations on pharmacokinetic DDIs of ADHD agents based on our literature review and the package inserts; whenever it was possible, we provide information on serum concentrations and dose correction factors. There will be a need to periodically update these recommendations and these correction factors as new knowledge becomes available.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Suggests Limited Drug-Drug Interaction for Fesoterodine When Coadministered With Mirabegron.

5-Hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT; the active fesoterodine metabolite) is metabolized via the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and CYP3A pathways. Mirabegron is a moderate CYP2D6 inhibitor and weak CYP3A inhibitor. Potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) following coadministration of these 2 overactive bladder treatments were estimated using physiologically based pharmacokinetic models, developed and verified by comparing predicted and observed pharmacokinetic profiles from clinical studies. Models predicted and verified mirabegron and desipramine (CYP2D6 substrate) and 5-HMT and ketoconazole (strong CYP3A inhibitor) DDIs. Mirabegron model-predicted mean steady-state AUC and Cmax were within 11% of clinical observations. The predicted versus observed geometric mean ratio (GMR) of AUCinf for CYP2D6 substrates desipramine and metoprolol coadministered with mirabegron 100 or 160mg once daily were 3.47 versus 3.41 and 2.97 versus 3.29, respectively, indicating that the mirabegron model can be used to predict clinical CYP2D6 inhibition. 5-HMT fractional clearance by CYP3A and CYP2D6 was verified from clinical DDI studies with a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor (ketoconazole) and inducer (rifampicin) in CYP2D6 extensive and poor metabolizers and with a moderate CYP3A inhibitor (fluconazole) in healthy volunteers. 5-HMT AUCinf and Cmax GMRs for fesoterodine DDIs were all predicted within 1.26-fold of clinical observation, providing verification for the fesoterodine substrate model. The predicted changes in 5-HMT AUCinf and Cmax ratios for 8 mg fesoterodine when coadministered with 50 mg mirabegron were 1.22-fold and 1.17-fold, respectively, relative to 8 mg fesoterodine given alone. This modest increase in 5-HMT exposures by approximately 20% is considered clinically insignificant and would not require fesoterodine dose adjustment when coadministered with mirabegron within approved daily-dose ranges.

Summary of Maribavir (SHP620) Drug–Drug Interactions Based on Accumulated Clinical and Nonclinical Data

Introduction Maribavir, a potent and orally bioavailable antiviral, is being evaluated in Phase 3 trials for the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in transplant patients. Often numerous concomitant medications are administered to these patients to manage their comorbidities. A thorough evaluation of maribavir potential for drug–drug interactions (DDIs) is warranted and required for the regulatory approval. Objectives To thoroughly evaluate potential DDIs for maribavir. Methods Extensive in vitro studies were conducted to evaluate the potential involvement of cytochrome P450s (CYPs), uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) and transporters on the disposition of maribavir, as well as the inhibitory and induction effect of maribavir on these enzymes and transporters. Clinical Phase 1 studies included a human mass-balance study, two probe-cocktail studies, and five DDI studies with ketoconazole, rifampin, antacid, voriconazole, and tacrolimus. Results Maribavir is metabolized primarily in the liver through CYP3A4 (70–85%) and CYP1A2 (15–30%). Renal clearance is a minor route ( Conclusions Maribavir has low risk for DDI. Inhibitors of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp may increase maribavir exposure, but dose adjustment of maribavir is not necessary. Potent inducers of CYP3A4 and P-gp decrease maribavir exposure, necessitating maribavir dose increase. Maribavir may increase exposure of immunosuppressants, such as tacrolimus. Therefore, monitoring of concomitant immunosuppressants' blood concentration should be considered at initiation, co-administration, and discontinuation of maribavir. Maribavir is not expected to interact with other concurrent medications.

An update on the physiopathology and therapeutic management of cholestatic pruritus in children

Pruritus is a disabling symptom accompanying chronic cholestasis. In extreme cases, the refractory nature of pruritus can result in a need for invasive therapies including liver transplantation. The pathogenesis of pruritus in cholestatic disease is poorly understood. It may involve a specific neural pathway (similar to that associated with pain) regulated by several pruritogenic substances such as bile acids, opioids, serotonin, and the more recently identified lysophosphatidic acid. While the therapeutic management of cholestatic pruritus is well established in adults, there is no consensus in children, in light of the difficulty of conducting controlled clinical studies. The currently recommended strategy to manage cholestatic pruritus in children is based on several lines of specific therapies that should be associated with skin hydration and with non-specific treatment of cholestasis including ursodeoxycholic acid. Pruritus should be assessed as objectively as possible between each line of therapy. Rifampicin, a potent CYP3A4 inducer, is the first-line treatment of cholestatic pruritus. Second-line therapies require evaluation of the child in an expert center and are discussed on a case-by-case basis depending on the underlying disease and the experience of the center. These include inhibitors of serotonin reuptake (sertraline), opioid antagonists (naloxone), or ASBT inhibitors. Invasive therapies such as biliary diversion or liver transplantation can also be proposed in the most severe cases. The aim of the current update is to review the physiopathologic mechanisms implicated in cholestatic pruritus and to propose potential therapeutic strategies in children.

Rifampicin reverses nicardipine effect inducing uncontrolled essential hypertension

Dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers are a known substrate for the cytochrome P450 isoform 3A4. Rifampicin, an antitubercular agent, is one of the most potent inducers of hepatic and intestinal CYP3A4 thus increasing dihydropyridine metabolism. We report a case of a 67-year-old hypertensive female treated with a four-drug antihypertensive regimen including a dihydropyridine (nicardipine 50mg bid), who was admitted for septic arthritis of the knee requiring antibiotic treatment with teicoplanin 400mg od and rifampicin 600mg bid. Six days after rifampicin initiation, she presented with Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome due to uncontrolled hypertension. We hypothesized that disequilibrium of previously controlled hypertension was partially due to nicardipine ineffectiveness. Plasma nicardipine concentration was assessed through high-performance liquid chromatography 5 hours after coadministration of the two drugs and proved undetectable.

Effect of Itraconazole and Rifampin on the Pharmacokinetics of Olaparib in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: Results of Two Phase I Open-label Studies

PurposeThe metabolism of olaparib, a potent inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) with demonstrated efficacy in patients with BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer, is mediated by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes (predominantly CYP3A4/5). We assessed the potential of a CYP3A4 inhibitor (itraconazole) and inducer (rifampin) to alter the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of olaparib following single oral tablet doses. MethodsTwo Phase I, open-label, non-randomized trials were conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors. In Study 7, patients received olaparib alone and co-administered with itraconazole; in Study 8, a separate group of patients received olaparib alone and co-administered with rifampin. No interaction between itraconazole and olaparib was concluded if two-sided 90% CIs for the treatment ratios of AUC and/or AUC0–t and Cmax fell within the bioequivalence range of 0.80–1.25. An interaction between rifampin and olaparib was concluded if the lower limit of the 90% CI for the treatment ratios was <0.5 (ie, >50% decrease in olaparib AUC or Cmax in the presence of rifampin compared with olaparib alone). FindingsIn Study 7 (N = 59; 17 male, 42 female), 56 and 53 patients were evaluable for PK analysis following treatment with olaparib alone and olaparib plus itraconazole, respectively; in Study 8 (N = 22; 4 male, 18 female), all patients were evaluable. Co-administration of olaparib with itraconazole resulted in a statistically significant increase in the relative bioavailability of olaparib: Cmax treatment ratio, 1.42 (90% CI, 1.33–1.52); mean AUC treatment ratio, 2.70 (90% CI, 2.44–2.97). Mean CL/F and Vz/F were reduced (8.16 vs 3.05 L/h and 192 vs 75.1 L), although mean t½ was unchanged (15.0 vs 15.6 hours). Co-administration of olaparib with rifampin resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the relative bioavailability of olaparib: Cmax treatment ratio, 0.29 (90% CI, 0.24–0.33); mean AUC treatment ratio, 0.13 (90% CI, 0.11–0.16). CL/F and Vz/F were increased when olaparib and rifampin were co-administered (6.36 vs 48.3 L/h and 112 vs 1076 L); however, mean t½ was unchanged (13.0 vs 15.8 hours). Safety data for olaparib following tablet dosing were consistent with the known safety profile. ImplicationsExposure to olaparib was significantly increased when co-administered with the potent CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole, and significantly decreased when co-administered with the potent CYP3A4 inducer rifampin, compared with olaparib alone. Potent CYP3A4 enzyme inhibitors and inducers should be avoided during olaparib treatment.ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01900028 (Study 7) and NCT01929603 (Study 8).

Establishment of In Silico Prediction Models for CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 Induction in Human Hepatocytes by Multiple Regression Analysis Using Azole Compounds.

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) via cytochrome P450 (P450) induction are one clinical problem leading to increased risk of adverse effects and the need for dosage adjustments and additional therapeutic monitoring. In silico models for predicting P450 induction are useful for avoiding DDI risk. In this study, we have established regression models for CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 induction in human hepatocytes using several physicochemical parameters for a set of azole compounds with different P450 induction as characteristics as model compounds. To obtain a well-correlated regression model, the compounds for CYP3A4 or CYP2B6 induction were independently selected from the tested azole compounds using principal component analysis with fold-induction data. Both of the multiple linear regression models obtained for CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 induction are represented by different sets of physicochemical parameters. The adjusted coefficients of determination for these models were of 0.8 and 0.9, respectively. The fold-induction of the validation compounds, another set of 12 azole-containing compounds, were predicted within twofold limits for both CYP3A4 and CYP2B6. The concordance for the prediction of CYP3A4 induction was 87% with another validation set, 23 marketed drugs. However, the prediction of CYP2B6 induction tended to be overestimated for these marketed drugs. The regression models show that lipophilicity mostly contributes to CYP3A4 induction, whereas not only the lipophilicity but also the molecular polarity is important for CYP2B6 induction. Our regression models, especially that for CYP3A4 induction, might provide useful methods to avoid potent CYP3A4 or CYP2B6 inducers during the lead optimization stage without performing induction assays in human hepatocytes.

Abstract P1-16-05: MDV3100-08: A phase 1 study evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics of enzalutamide plus fulvestrant in women with advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

Abstract Background: Fulvestrant (FUL), an estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist, is an effective treatment for patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) whose disease has progressed or recurred during previous anti-estrogen therapy. The androgen receptor (AR), expressed in the majority of HR+ BC, may contribute to resistance to hormonal therapy. Enzalutamide (ENZA) is a potent inhibitor of AR signaling. Preclinical models with ER+/AR+ BC cell lines showed synergistic inhibitory effects for ENZA combined with FUL on tumor cell growth. ENZA is a potent CYP3A4 inducer, and in vitro studies show that CYP3A4 is the only CYP enzyme involved in the oxidative metabolism of FUL. In this phase 1 trial (NCT01597193), we evaluated the potential for ENZA to affect FUL pharmacokinetics (PK), as well as the safety and tolerability of the combination of ENZA with FUL. Methods: Postmenopausal pts with HR+/AR+ advanced BC were enrolled; any number of prior therapies were permissible. Tumor tissue was analyzed centrally for AR expression; pts who had ?10% tumor cells with nuclear AR staining were eligible. All pts received at least 3 doses of FUL (500 mg intramuscularly on days 1, 15, and 29 and once monthly thereafter) to ensure steady-state concentrations prior to initiating ENZA 160 mg/day orally. The combination of ENZA with FUL was given until disease progression. PK and hormone sampling occurred on day 1 prior to ENZA initiation and on days 29 and 57. All pts were monitored for safety and response to treatment. Results: As of 01May2015, 11 pts were enrolled; PK data are available for 8 of 11 pts, and 6 pts remain on study. Median age was 59 years; median ECOG performance status was 1. Two pts previously received FUL as a prior therapy for advanced BC; 4 pts received no prior therapy for advanced BC. The median duration of exposure to the combination was 16.6 weeks (range 4.0-42.3); the median duration of exposure to FUL (including at least 3 preloading doses) was 24.4 weeks (range 11.7-67.3). Common (&amp;gt;2 pts) ENZA-related adverse events (AEs) included fatigue (n=6), nausea (n=5), cognitive disorder (n=4) and diarrhea (n=3). Cognitive changes Grade 1/2 were reported in 4 pts based on the cognitive function assessment questionnaire. Two pts reported unrelated serious AEs (erosive gastritis, urinary tract infection, iron deficiency anemia, and dehydration). Four pts had AEs ≥ Grade 3: hypertension, anemia, hyperglycemia, urinary tract infection, asthenia, erosive gastritis, dehydration, and iron deficiency anemia; only asthenia and hypertension were considered treatment-related. Circulating levels of estradiol and estrone were within the expected range. Trough plasma concentrations of FUL (Cmin) were similar for FUL alone and FUL combined with ENZA (Cmin=13.7 ± 2.8 and 12.5 ± 1.8 ng/mL, respectively). Conclusions: The safety profile for the combination of daily ENZA with FUL appears to be consistent with the published data for ENZA and FUL monotherapies. ENZA with FUL achieves similar plasma exposure to FUL alone, indicating no PK drug interaction. Citation Format: Elias AD, Burris HA, Patel MR, Schwartzberg LS, Richer JK, Kavalerchik E, Stopatschinskaja S, Gibbons J, Markova D, Steinberg JL, Traina TA. MDV3100-08: A phase 1 study evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics of enzalutamide plus fulvestrant in women with advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-16-05.

Mechanistic understanding of the nonlinear pharmacokinetics and intersubject variability of simeprevir: A PBPK-guided drug development approach.

Simeprevir, a hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease inhibitor, displays nonlinear pharmacokinetics (PK) at therapeutic doses. Using physiologically based PK modeling, various drug-drug interactions were simulated with simeprevir as victim drug to identify whether saturation of the predominant metabolic enzyme (CYP3A4) or the active hepatic transporters (organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1/3) could account for the nonlinear PK. Interactions with ritonavir, a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor that does not affect OATP (at 100 mg dose), erythromycin, a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor, and efavirenz, a moderate CYP3A inducer that does not affect OATP, demonstrated the involvement of CYP3A4. Interaction studies with low-dose cyclosporine confirmed the role of OATP. The interplay between hepatic uptake and CYP3A4 metabolism was verified by simulations with rifampicin, a potent CYP3A4 inducer and OATP1B1/3 inhibitor, and maintenance doses of cyclosporine. Saturation of gut and liver metabolism by CYP3A4, and saturation of hepatic uptake by OATP1B1/3, seem to account for the observed nonlinear PK of simeprevir.

Perspectives on oral pulmonary hypertension therapies recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

In the past 18 months, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved macitentan, riociguat, and treprostinil as oral agents for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); riociguat also became the first agent approved for the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). These new agents are welcome additional therapeutic options for PAH and CTEPH. However, their use can be complicated by potential drug interactions, adverse effects, dosing complexity, and cost. Macitentan, the newest endothelin receptor antagonist, showed significant benefits in a long-term event-driven trial of morbidity and mortality. Dosed once daily and with minimal liver toxicity, it has potential drug interactions with potent CYP 3A4 inhibitors and inducers, and can decrease hemoglobin levels. Riociguat is approved for PAH and clinically inoperable CTEPH to improve exercise capacity and functional status. Riociguat requires dose titration beginning with 1 mg up to 2.5 mg three times a day, as tolerated, and should be used with caution in patients with underlying risk factors for systemic hypotension. Oral treprostinil, approved to improve exercise capacity in PAH, is associated with gastrointestinal side effects and headaches that are often dose limiting. Doses can begin with 0.125 mg or 0.25 mg twice a day with gradual increases on up to a weekly basis, as tolerated. Thrice daily dosing and administration with a meal can improve tolerance. These newer agents represent advances, but their specific roles in relation to pre-existing therapies are undergoing further evaluation. Therefore, close collaboration with clinicians at centers with therapeutic expertise is highly recommended to optimize patient outcomes.

Predicting drug-drug interactions involving multiple mechanisms using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling: a case study with ruxolitinib.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling was applied to characterize the potential drug-drug interactions for ruxolitinib. A ruxolitinib physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was constructed using all baseline PK data in healthy subjects, and verified by retrospective predictions of observed drug-drug interactions with rifampin (a potent CYP3A4 inducer), ketoconazole (a potent CYP3A4 reversible inhibitor) and erythromycin (a moderate time-dependent inhibitor of CYP3A4). The model prospectively predicts that 100-200mg daily dose of fluconazole, a dual inhibitor of CYP3A4 and 2C9, would increase ruxolitinib plasma concentration area under the curve by ∼two-fold, and that as a perpetrator, ruxolitinib is highly unlikely to have any discernible effect on digoxin, a sensitive P-glycoprotein substrate. The analysis described here illustrates the capability of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to predict drug-drug interactions involving several commonly encountered interaction mechanisms and makes the case for routine use of model-based prediction for clinical drug-drug interactions. A model verification checklist was explored to harmonize the methodology and use of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling.

Review of Tolvaptan's Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties and Drug Interactions.

Tolvaptan is an arginine vasopressin (AVP) antagonist that acts to increase excretion of free water (aquaresis) in patients without introducing electrolyte abnormalities or worsening renal function. It works via blockade of vasopressin-2 receptors at the renal collecting duct. Since the approval of tolvaptan for the treatment of hypervolemic and euvolemic hyponatremia in 2009, new studies have been reported to better characterize its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of tolvaptan. This paper is a review of both these clinical studies, as well as previous literature, in order to help guide appropriate clinical use of tolvaptan in patients. With appropriate monitoring of serum sodium, tolvaptan may be safely dose escalated from 15 mg once daily to a maximum effective dose of 60 mg once daily for multiple days, to achieve optimal aqauretic effects. In terms of drug interactions, co-administration of moderate to potent CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers should be avoided. Tolvaptan should also be co-administered with caution and proper monitoring in the presence of P-glycoprotein substrate and strong inhibitors. Co-administration of tolvaptan with diuretic therapy did not appear to alter the aquaretic effect of tolvaptan; and was shown to be safe and well tolerated.