Jean Hyppolite, Hegel in Baltimore Jean-Baptiste Vuillerod In his book French Theory, François Cusset claims that the symposium held in Baltimore in October 1966 was the birthplace for poststructuralism and French theory, even though these movements were not yet coined as such (Cusset 27). Cusset underlines the building of a united vision of French philosophy in the United States; he also details that this community was exclusively negative (19), that is to say that the poststructuralist thinkers shared common enemies rather than common positions. Among these enemies, Hegel was certainly the most prominent one. At the beginning of the 1960s, the richest and most vivid French thought was also the most severely opposed to Hegelianism. In many works, such as Jacques Derrida's, Michel Foucault's, Emmanuel Levinas's, Louis Althusser's, Gilles Deleuze's or Jean-François Lyotard's, G.W.F. Hegel was once considered the "dead dog" of philosophy. So the question I would like to address is: what is the meaning of this anti-Hegelianism in Baltimore in 1966? In their preface to The Structuralist Controversy: the Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, Richard Macksey and Eugenio Donato agree with the idea of a general anti-Hegelianism in French philosophy, and they claim that "Nietzsche has now come to occupy the central position that … was held by the Gallic Hegel" (xii). Yet, there is something wrong about the golden legend of the replacement of Hegel by Nietzsche: through Jean Hyppolite, Hegel was indeed present in Baltimore: in his talk, "the voice of Hegel" was heard at the very moment when anti-Hegelian structuralism was being promoted (Foucault 807). So how can we account for this? Is it an anachronism, as suggested by Donato and Macksey, Hegel's swan song in a way—and we know that Hyppolite died less than two years afterwards? Or can we [End Page 999] read here something else: a French philosophy far less anti-Hegelian than it claims to be? I would like to show that Hyppolite's lecture reveals the need for a more complex reading of French theory, with fewer prejudices against Hegel. Hyppolite compels us to consider that, back then, a reading of Hegel was possible and that it would have been compatible with some poststructuralist ambitions. Therefore, I shall start with a presentation of the way in which Hyppolite understands the project of Hegelian philosophy; then I shall examine in what sense he presents Hegel as a precursor of Husserlian phenomenology and of structuralism. Finally, I will see how he maintains that Hegelian philosophy also overcame those phenomenological and structuralist models and announced a new thought that would be concordant with poststructuralism. The Project of Hegelian Philosophy Hyppolite's lecture is entitled "The Structure of Philosophic Language According to the 'Preface' to Hegel's Phenomenology of Mind." Its first sentence reveals the deep awareness Hyppolite has of the apparent anachronism of his talk: "Isn't it too late to speak of Hegel in our age … ?" (Macksey and Donato 157). This delay would also be the delay of "metaphysical thought" compared to the progress of positive sciences. In fact, both the natural and the human sciences intend to avoid philosophy, which is reduced to a "criticism of metaphysics" (157). And Hyppolite quotes Nietzsche, Marx, and Freud, the three "masters of suspicion," as Paul Ricoeur called them. Overtaken by the sciences, philosophy is only left with the negativity of criticism, essentially its own criticism. If Hyppolite suggests a return to Hegel, it is precisely because he appears as the last great metaphysician—provided that one understands metaphysics as the positive task of philosophy. As Hyppolite says: "It is precisely because Hegel is the last of the great metaphysicians … that his thought interests us" (157–158). Hyppolite specifies what he understands by his return to Hegel. He does not intend to bring the Hegelian system back to life, and even insists on the fact that his encyclopaedic system is less important than what is at stake in the Phenomenology of Spirit and the Science of Logic. What truly interests Hyppolite in Hegel's philosophy is the elaboration of a philosophical discursivity which would not be...
Read full abstract