Post-procedure Pain Scores Research Articles

Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation for Analgesia During Outpatient Endometrial Biopsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

To evaluate whether transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) decreases pain at the time of outpatient endometrial biopsy. We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial of active TENS compared with placebo TENS at the time of endometrial biopsy. The primary outcome was pain measured on a 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale immediately after biopsy, with secondary outcomes including satisfaction and tolerability of TENS and pain scores at other procedural time points. To detect a 15-mm reduction in pain with a 30-mm SD, 80.0% power, and a significance level of 0.05, 64 participants were required in each arm. From December 2022 to December 2023, 135 participants were randomized with 67 in the placebo TENS arm and 68 in the active TENS arm. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. The median (interquartile range) pain score immediately after biopsy was 50 mm (20-80 mm) in the active TENS group and 60 mm (40-100 mm) in the placebo TENS group (P=.039). Pain scores at other time intervals were not statistically significantly different. In a subset analysis, participants with higher-than-median baseline anxiety had postprocedural pain scores (interquartile range) of 50 mm (40-80 mm) in the active TENS group compared with 80 mm (50-100 mm) in the placebo TENS group. Overall satisfaction (interquartile range) with pain control (with 100 mm representing completely satisfied) was 87.5 mm (60-100 mm) for active TENS and 70 mm (41-100 mm) for placebo TENS; 85.3% of active TENS participants would use TENS in a future endometrial biopsy. Minimal side effects were associated with TENS, with one participant reporting itching at the pad sites. Despite a statistical difference in pain scores, a clinical difference was not seen between active and placebo TENS for pain during endometrial biopsy. Satisfaction was higher in the active TENS group, and there were overall minimal side effects associated with TENS. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05472740.

Intra- and post-procedural patient-reported experience measures and their correlation with post-ERCP adverse events and unplanned healthcare utilization.

Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) adverse events (AEs) are common, as is unplanned healthcare utilization (UHU). We aimed to assess potential etiologic associations between intra-/post-procedural patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) and post-ERCP AEs and UHU. METHODS : Prospective data from a multicenter collaborative were used. A 0-10 Likert-based PREM assessing intra- and post-procedural symptoms was applied to patients following ERCP, and follow-up was performed at 30 days to identify AEs and UHU for reasons not meeting the definitions of any AE. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted using PREM domains as exposures and AEs and UHU as outcomes, with a priori selected covariates. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95 %CIs for each PREM domain were reported. From 2018 to 2023, 3434 patients were included. A post-procedural abdominal pain score > 3 was associated with pancreatitis (OR 3.71 [95 %CI 2.37-5.73]), while a score > 6 was associated with perforation (OR 9.54 [95 %CI 1.10-59.37]). Post-procedural pain was also associated with UHU within 30 days when used as a continuous exposure (OR 1.08 per point [95 %CI 1.01-1.16]), and when partitioned at a score > 3 (OR 1.79 [95 %CI 1.13-2.74]) and a score > 6 (OR 1.93 [95 %CI 1.02-3.46]). No other intra- or post-procedural PREMs were associated with any AEs or UHU. Patient-reported abdominal pain from a Likert-based PREM at the time of discharge from ERCP was associated with pancreatitis, perforation, and UHU within 30 days. Applying PREMs could potentially prevent UHU and/or facilitate earlier management and improved outcomes for patients with post-ERCP AEs.

Comparison of the effectiveness of 0.5% and 0.25% proparacaine hydrochloride eye drops as topical anesthetics in routine ocular investigations and procedures.

To compare the effectiveness of 0.5% and 0.25% proparacaine eye drops in providing topical anesthesia for routine ocular procedures. 137 patients (274 eyes) were included in this study. They were categorized into two groups. Group A patients received 0.5% and Group B received 0.25% proparacaine drops. A single surgeon performed all the procedures. Intraprocedural and postprocedural pain scores, surgeon comfort, supplemental anesthesia, and vital parameters, were noted. The mean age of the participants was 69.42 years (±12.05). An equal number of procedures were performed (n = 30) for applanation tonometry, lacrimal sac syringing, and A-scan biometry. The other procedures performed were removal of the conjunctiva (n = 5) and corneal foreign bodies (n = 16 per group), corneal scraping (n = 8 per group), and corneal suture removal (n = 18 per group).The mean visual analog pain score during the procedure was 6.9663 in Group A and 8.0803 in Group B (P = 0.66). The mean postprocedural pain score was not significant (P = 0.21). None of the patients required any additional anesthesia during or after the procedure. The average surgeon's experience was 0.152±0.507 in Group A and 0.111±0.402 in Group B (P = 0.07).In Group A, 133 of 137 patients (97.08%), and in Group B, 132 out of 137 patients (96.35%) preferred to use the same anesthetic for future procedures. None of the patients experienced a vasovagal attack or any change in vital parameters. The present study aimed to establish equivalence between two concentrations of proparacaine hydrochloride in which false positive and false negative errors were expected. This is the inherent challenge in the equivalence and inferiority trials. To mitigate these risks, the present study was carefully designed with specific statistical methods, sample size calculation, and rigorous methodology. Nevertheless, it is crucial to recognize that the risk of false positive errors remains, and the results should be interpreted with this in mind. These findings indicated that 0.25% proparacaine is a viable alternative to the standard 0.5% concentration in routine ophthalmic procedures, with the potential for improved patient comfort.

Resorbable Microspheres versus Trisacryl Gelatin Microspheres for Uterine Artery Embolization: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background There are insufficient data comparing resorbable microspheres (RMs) with permanent trisacryl gelatin microspheres (TAGMs) for uterine artery embolization (UAE). Purpose To compare therapeutic efficacy and clinical outcomes in participants with symptomatic fibroids after UAE with RMs or TAGMs. Materials and Methods This randomized controlled trial included participants undergoing UAE for symptomatic fibroids at a single institution (from May 2021 to May 2023). Participants were randomized one-to-one to undergo UAE with either RMs or TAGMs. Numeric rating scale pain scores and cumulative fentanyl consumption were assessed for 24 hours after undergoing UAE. Anti-Mullerian hormone was measured to assess effects of UAE on ovarian function. MRI was performed before and 3 months after UAE to evaluate fibroid necrosis and uterine artery recanalization. Repeated variables such as pain were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test with post hoc Bonferroni correction. Results Sixty female participants (mean age, 45.7 years ± 3.6 [SD]) completed the study, with 30 in each group. No evidence of a difference in pain scores was observed between groups (P > .99). Moreover, there was no evidence of a difference in the total fentanyl consumption at 24 hours after UAE between groups (median: RMs, 423 [IQR, 330-530] vs TAGMs, 562 [IQR, 437-780]; P = .15). Serum anti-Mullerian hormone 3 months after UAE showed no evidence of a difference between groups (RMs vs TAGMs, 0.71 ng/mL ± 0.73 vs 0.49 ng/mL ± 0.45, respectively; P = .09). No evidence of a difference in the rate of complete necrosis of the dominant fibroid was observed between groups (97% [29 of 30] for both groups; P > .99). The rate of uterine artery recanalization was higher in RM versus TAGM groups (70% [21 of 30] vs 17% [five of 30], respectively; P < .001). Conclusion UAE with RMs, compared with UAE with TAGMs, showed no evidence of a difference in terms of therapeutic effectiveness or postprocedural pain scores in participants with symptomatic fibroids. Clinical trial registration no. NCT05086770 © RSNA, 2024 See also the editorial by Spies in this issue.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided versus percutaneous liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Percutaneous liver biopsy (PC-LB) has long been the usual method for acquisition of liver tissue. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) has gained popularity as an alternative modality. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of EUS-LB versus PC-LB. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing EUS-LB with PC-LB published until October 20, 2023. The primary outcome was diagnostic adequacy. Secondary outcomes were: the number of complete portal tracts (CPTs), longest sample length (LSL), total sample length (TSL), post-procedure pain scores, and adverse events (AEs), including overall AEs and AEs excluding minor post-procedure symptoms. We compared binary outcomes using risk ratios (RRs) and continuous outcomes using the mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD), with 95%CIs. Four RCTs (258 patients) were included. The EUS-LB group presented lower post-procedure pain scores (SMD -0.58, 95%CI -0.95 to -0.22) than the PC-LB group. Both groups performed similarly in terms of diagnostic adequacy (RR 1.0, 95%CI 0.96 to 1.04), number of CPTs (MD 2.57, 95%CI -4.09 to 9.22), LSL (MD -2.91 mm, 95%CI -5.86 to 0.03), TSL (MD 4.16 mm, 95%CI -10.12 to 18.45), overall AEs (RR 0.54, 95%CI 0.20 to 1.46), and AEs excluding minor post-procedure symptoms (RR 1.65, 95%CI 0.21 to 13.02). This meta-analysis suggests that EUS-LB is as safe and effective as PC-LB and is associated with lower post-procedure pain scores.Registration on PROSPERO: CRD42023469469.

Preprocedural Paracetamol Reduces Pain Scores in Patients Undergoing in-Office Laryngeal Procedures.

To investigate the utility of preprocedural paracetamol on reducing pain scores post office-based laryngeal procedures. Prospective, controlled before-after comparative study. Controlled prospective before-after study. A retrospective analysis was performed of 100 patients who underwent office-based laryngeal procedures without preprocedural analgesia at our center to establish a control group. Age, sex, procedure type, and amount of substance used were documented as well as postprocedural pain score. Pain scores were recorded every 5 minutes for 30 minutes following office-based laryngeal procedures. A prospective arm of this study was then performed in which every patient undergoing office-based laryngeal procedures at our center between September 2019 and December 2020 was administered 1000 mg of paracetamol prior to their procedure. The postprocedure pain scores of the 2 groups were then compared. A hundred patients were included in the retrospective arm and 75 patients were included in the prospective arm, receiving 1000 mg of paracetamol a median of 45 (interquartile range: 30-53) minutes prior to their procedure. The 2 groups were matched for age, sex, and type of laryngeal procedure. Both nonanalgesia and analgesia groups demonstrated a similar proportion of patients who experienced any pain (47% and 48%, respectively) postprocedurally. The prospective arm of this study however reported a statistically significant reduction in the magnitude of their pain scores at all points postprocedurally (P = .005). Paracetamol preprocedurally reduces the severity of pain in office-based laryngeal procedures and would be a useful consideration for patients who are likely to experience significant postprocedural pain. Level 3.

Use of regional anesthesia within a pediatric interventional radiology suite reduced periprocedural opioid use without delaying the overall workflow: a retrospective study

BackgroundNerve block utility has been extensively described in the operating room, however, there is a paucity of evidence regarding blocks in the interventional radiology (IR) suite, with no studies examining...

(108) ENHANCING PELVIC EXAM COMFORT AND DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY: REVIEWING THE UTILITY OF NITROUS OXIDE FOR HYPERTONIC PELVIC FLOOR ASSESSMENT

Abstract Introduction Nitrous oxide is an anesthetic, anxiolytic, and analgesic commonly used for general and dental anesthesia, sedation, and severe pain. Studies show that nitrous oxide is also used in several in-office gynecological and urological procedures as a sedative and anxiolytic agent with a safer drug profile than other anesthetic agents. It is also being trialed as a treatment for mood disorders. Nitrous oxide does not render individuals unconscious, making it a more favorable option for stressful and painful medical procedures than general anesthesia because it allows the patient to feel more in control of their body and aware of the proceedings. Objective To analyze the use of in-office nitrous oxide during medical procedures and evaluate its effectiveness in reducing pain and anxiety levels to predict the utility of it during pelvic exams in patients with vestibulodynia. Methods A literature review was performed through the PubMed database between 2007-2022. The authors independently and thoroughly screened abstracts and full-text articles and assessed the relevant medical literature that acknowledged the use of nitrous oxide in in-office medical procedures. Key terms used to refine the search include [“nitrous oxide in medical procedures”], [“nitrous oxide in gynecology”], [“nitrous oxide in urology”]. Results One study explored the use of nitrous oxide during childbirth in women diagnosed with PTSD, and the results were significant for nitrous oxide reducing PTSD symptom severity. Multiple studies suggest the use of nitrous oxide during dental procedures reduces patient anxiety; one specifically measured sixty anxious patients pre- and post-endodontic procedures and noted a significant reduction in anxiety during the procedure with the use of nitrous oxide. Various studies of gynecological and urological procedures report the successful use of nitrous oxide in reducing peri-procedural pain compared to other analgesic alternatives. A common example is its use during intrauterine device insertion, which is correlated with higher patient satisfaction as it decreases pain. Additionally, a study among patients undergoing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy found no significant difference between the use of meperidine, an opioid, and nitrous oxide in post-procedural Visual Analog Scale pain scores with no adverse events reported in the nitrous oxide group. Another study revealed that using local anesthesia in transrectal prostate biopsies resulted in some patients experiencing notable anxiety and pain. At the same time, no such relationship was observed among patients who received nitrous oxide before this procedure. Conclusions Vestibulodynia is a subset of genitopelvic pain isolated to the vulvar vestibule. Vestibulodynia has three proposed etiologies: tissue neural proliferation, musculoskeletal, and hormonally mediated. Discriminating these three etiologies can be difficult, especially when a proper pelvic exam cannot be achieved due to patients’ discomfort. The three etiologies are biologically intertwined, often resulting in vestibulodynia patients experiencing pelvic floor hypertonicity without regard to specific etiology. A painful pelvic exam is stressful and often an anxiety-producing experience for patients with pelvic hypertonicity and vulvodynia. Hence, with the data provided, we suspect that nitrous oxide will be a useful treatment option to mitigate these consequences for the patient, with the added benefit of easing the exam for the provider, leading to a more accurate diagnosis. Disclosure No.

Efficacy of Lidocaine Spray for Pain Reduction during Colposcopy-Directed Cervical Biopsies: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine spray in reducing the pain during colposcopy-directed cervical biopsy (CDB). Methods: From December 2017 to February 2019, 312 women undergoing CDBs were enrolled. The participants were randomized to three groups: group 1 (lidocaine spray), in which lidocaine spray was applied thoroughly to the cervix; group 2 (placebo), in which normal saline was applied thoroughly to the cervix; and group 3 (control), in which no anesthetic agent was applied to the cervix. Each woman completed a 10 cm visual analog scale to classify the subjective pain experience at three time points: baseline, immediately after biopsy, and 10 min after the procedure. The primary outcome of this study was the biopsy pain score. Results: The 312 enrolled women were randomly assigned to the three groups, amounting to 104 women per group. The clinical and pathological characteristics of the participants in all groups were comparable. The baseline, the biopsy, and the post-procedure pain scores were comparable among the three groups. There was a significant increase in the pain score from baseline to biopsy and from baseline to post-procedure in each group. The pain-score changes from baseline to biopsy in the lidocaine spray group significantly decreased when compared with the normal saline group (<0.001), and tended to decrease, though not significantly (p = 0.06), when compared with the control group. No complication with the intervention was observed. Conclusions: The application of lidocaine spray to the cervix has the benefit of reducing the pain associated with CDBs by a small amount. However, the intervention is safe and may be considered in nulliparous and/or overly anxious women undergoing the procedure.

The effect of virtual reality glasses applied during intrauterine device insertion on pain, anxiety and satisfaction: Randomized controlled study.

This study was carried out to determine the effect of the use of "virtual reality glasses," on anxiety, pain, and satisfaction level in order to reduce anxiety and pain during intrauterine device (IUD) insertion, which is a painful and stressful procedure for women and to divert attention to increase satisfaction. This randomized controlled study in the gynecology clinic of a state hospital with 80 women who were accepted to participate in the study. Data were collected using structured patient information form, numerical pain rating scale, state-trait anxiety inventory, patient satisfaction evaluation form, and virtual reality glasses. Post-procedural pain scores in the control group after IUD application were higher than post-procedural pain in the virtual reality group. Measurements of post-procedure anxiety in the control group were higher than measurements of post-procedural in the virtual reality group. Satisfaction levels of women with virtual reality glasses during IUD insertion were also found to be high. It was determined that the use of virtual reality glasses, one of the methods of distraction during IUD insertion, was effective in reducing pain and anxiety and increasing patient satisfaction.

Ultrasound-guided Stellate Ganglion Block for Upper Extremity Phantom Limb Pain - A Case Series

Abstract Background: Stellate ganglion block (SGB) is effectively utilized in various sympathetically mediated pain conditions of head and neck, upper limb such as complex regional pain syndrome, postherpetic neuralgias, but there has been a paucity of evidence of SGB for the management of phantom limb pain (PLP). Methods: Ten upper extremity PLP patients underwent ultrasound-guided SGB block. Under real-time needle tip visualization and after ensuring negative aspiration, 5 mL of 1% lignocaine and 4 mg of dexamethasone were injected. Postprocedure pain score (numerical rating scale [NRS]) and patient satisfaction score (Likert scale) were noted, and patients were followed-up for the next 60 days. Results: The baseline NRS score (Mean [standard deviation]) of 7.8 (0.748) showed significant reduction (P &lt; 0.001) to 2.8 (0.748) at immediate postinjection, to 2.6 (0.663) at day 7, at day 30 (2.9 [0.7]), and at day 60 (30.775). Most of the patients (80%–90%) were somewhat to very much satisfied with the treatment response (score 4–5 on Likert scale) at all the follow-up intervals. Only mild and transient adverse events were demonstrated in two patients who developed hoarseness of voice. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided SGB effectively reduces pain and improves patient satisfaction in postamputee patients who developed PLP, over 2 months of the follow-up period. Further prospective randomized controlled trials over a larger duration with more sample size are needed to provide more concrete evidence.

(273) The Use of In-Office Nitrous Oxide to Aid in Diagnosing Hypertonic Pelvic Floor and Improve Patient Comfort with Pelvic Exams

Abstract Introduction Nitrous oxide is an anesthetic, anxiolytic, and analgesic commonly used for general and dental anesthesia, sedation, and severe pain. Studies show that nitrous oxide is also used in several in-office gynecological and urological procedures as a sedative and anxiolytic agent with a safer drug profile than other anesthetic agents. It is also being trialed as a treatment for mood disorders. Nitrous oxide does not render individuals unconscious, making it a more favorable option for stressful and painful medical procedures than general anesthesia because it allows the patient to feel more in control of their body and aware of the proceedings. Objective To analyze the use of in-office nitrous oxide during medical procedures and evaluate its effectiveness in reducing pain and anxiety levels to predict the utility of it during pelvic exams in patients with vestibulodynia. Methods A literature review was performed through the PubMed database between 2007-2022. The authors independently and thoroughly screened abstracts and full-text articles and assessed the relevant medical literature that acknowledged the use of nitrous oxide in in-office medical procedures. Key terms used to refine the search include [“nitrous oxide in medical procedures”], [“nitrous oxide in gynecology”], [“nitrous oxide in urology”]. Results One study explored the use of nitrous oxide during childbirth in women diagnosed with PTSD, and the results were significant for nitrous oxide reducing PTSD symptom severity. Multiple studies suggest the use of nitrous oxide during dental procedures reduces patient anxiety; one specifically measured sixty anxious patients pre- and post-endodontic procedures and noted a significant reduction in anxiety during the procedure with the use of nitrous oxide. Various studies of gynecological and urological procedures report the successful use of nitrous oxide in reducing peri-procedural pain compared to other analgesic alternatives. A common example is its use during intrauterine device insertion, which is correlated with higher patient satisfaction as it decreases pain. Additionally, a study among patients undergoing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy found no significant difference between the use of meperidine, an opioid, and nitrous oxide in post-procedural Visual Analog Scale pain scores with no adverse events reported in the nitrous oxide group. Another study revealed that using local anesthesia in transrectal prostate biopsies resulted in some patients experiencing notable anxiety and pain. At the same time, no such relationship was observed among patients who received nitrous oxide before this procedure. Conclusions Vestibulodynia is a subset of genitopelvic pain isolated to the vulvar vestibule. Vestibulodynia has three proposed etiologies: tissue neural proliferation, musculoskeletal, and hormonally mediated. Discriminating these three etiologies can be difficult, especially when a proper pelvic exam cannot be achieved due to patients’ discomfort. The three etiologies are biologically intertwined, often resulting in vestibulodynia patients experiencing pelvic floor hypertonicity without regard to specific etiology. A painful pelvic exam is stressful and often an anxiety-producing experience for patients with pelvic hypertonicity and vulvodynia. Hence, with the data provided, we suspect that nitrous oxide will be a useful treatment option to mitigate these consequences for the patient, with the added benefit of easing the exam for the provider, leading to a more accurate diagnosis. Disclosure No.

Contrast flow in CT-guided lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injections: does needle position effect the laterality of contrast flow?

To evaluate the effect of needle position on the laterality of contrast flow in CT-guided lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injections. A retrospective review of consecutive CT-guided interlaminar lumbar epidural steroid injections was performed. The terminal needle tip position (midline or lateral) and the laterality of epidural contrast were evaluated by two readers. Contrast flow pattern was classified as ipsilateral to needle trajectory, bilateral, or contralateral. Bilateral flow was further divided into asymmetric, symmetrical, or asymmetric to the contralateral side. Inter-reader agreement was calculated with the kappa statistic. The relationship of needle position to contrast laterality was calculated with the chi statistic. Pain scores were compared for bilateral and unilateral flows with a two-tailed T test for independent means. A total of 250 injections were included in 204 patients, with an age range of 24 to 93years. The most commonly injected level (145/250) was L4-L5. Agreement between the two readers was almost perfect and substantial (kappa 0.751-0.880). The majority of injections (154/250) demonstrated contrast flow ipsilateral to the needle trajectory, 90/250 demonstrated bilateral flow, and 6/250 had contralateral flow. Of the 90 cases with bilateral flow, 80% were performed with a midline terminal needle position (p < 0.001). There was no difference in immediate post-procedure pain scores between patients with ipsilateral or bilateral contrast flow. For interlaminar epidural steroid injections, a midline terminal needle tip position has a greater probability of producing bilateral contrast flow compared to a lateral terminal needle tip position.

POUR-UP: Power of Urination in Relieving Urethral Pain During Flexible Cystoscopy in Males

ABSTRACTThis study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of micturition (urination) during flexible cystoscopy in alleviating urethral pain in males. A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted with 103 male outpatients at a tertiary care hospital in Malaysia. Participants, aged 18–80, undergoing flexible cystoscopy were randomly assigned to either a control or interventional group. The interventional group was instructed to urinate during the procedure, while the control group received no such instructions. All patients received standard lidocaine gel before the examination. Patient discomfort was assessed using Visual Analogue Scores (VAS) at three points: before gel instillation (baseline), immediately after the procedure, and 15 minutes post-examination. Age, BMI, duration of the examination, and examiner experience were also recorded to explore their correlation with the immediate post-procedure pain score. The interventional group reported significantly lower pain scores immediately after the procedure (p &lt; 0.001) and 15 minutes later (p &lt; 0.005) compared to the control group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in age, BMI, examination duration, or examiner experience level between the two groups regarding the pain score immediately post-procedure. These findings suggest that urination during flexible cystoscopy can substantially alleviate urinary discomfort and lead to a significant reduction in urethral pain in males. This approach mayprovide a valuable method to improve patient comfort during the procedure.

Radiofrequency ablation of the occipital nerves for treatment of neuralgias and headache.

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy as a treatment for occipital neuralgias and headaches at health clinics in the United States between January 1, 2015 and June 20, 2022. We hypothesize that RFA is a minimally invasive treatment that provides significant pain relief long-term for occipital neuralgias and associated headaches. This retrospective analysis studies data collected from 277 occipital nerve RFA patients who had adequate pre-procedure and post-procedure follow-up for data analysis. Data collected includes the patient's age, biological sex, BMI, headache diagnosis, pre-procedure, and post-procedure pain score using the visual analog scale (VAS), subjective percent improvement in symptom(s), and duration of symptom relief. Statistical analysis used SPSS software, version 26 (IBM), using a paired t-test to assess the significance between pre and post-occipital RFA therapy pain scores. p-values were significant if found to be ≤0.05. The mean pre-procedure pain score before RFA therapy for patients who completed at least 6 months of follow-up was 5.57 (SD = 1.87) and the mean post-procedure pain score after RFA therapy was 2.39 (SD = 2.42). The improvement in pain scores between pre-procedure and post-procedure was statistically significant with a p-value < 0.001. The mean patient-reported percent improvement in pain following RFA therapy was 63.53% (SD = 36.37). The mean duration of pain improvement was 253.9 days after the initiation of therapy (SD = 300.5). When excluding patients who did not have any relief following their RFA procedure, the average pre-procedure pain score was 5.54 (SD = 1.81) and post-procedure pain score was 1.71 (SD = 1.81) with a p-value < 0.001. This study demonstrates the minimally invasive, safe, and effective treatment of RFA in patients with refractory occipital neuralgias and headaches. Additional studies are necessary to illuminate ideal patient characteristics for RFA treatment and the potential for procedural complications and long-term side effects associated with occipital nerve RFA therapy.

The Effect of Video Streaming With Virtual Reality on Anxiety and Pain During Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy Procedure

BackgroundPain and anxiety are among the most common symptoms in patients undergoing invasive procedures. Increased pain levels tend to worsen anxiety, and anxiety often leads to more frequent or severe pain. AimsThe study was conducted to determine the efficacy of virtual reality goggles (VRG) on pain and anxiety during bone marrow aspiration and biopsy (BMAB) procedure. DesignA randomized controlled experimental study. SettingsThe outpatient unit of an adult hematology clinic of a tertiary care university hospital. Participants/SubjectsThe study was conducted in patients aged 18 years and older who underwent a BMAB procedure. Thirty-five patients in the experimental (VRG) group and 40 patients in the control group. MethodsPatient identification form, visual analogue scale (VAS), state and trait anxiety inventory (STAI), and VRG were used to collect the data. ResultsPostprocedural state anxiety mean scores were found to be statistically significantly higher in the control group than in the VRG group (p = .022). A statistically significant difference was found between groups in terms of procedure-related pain (p = .002). The postprocedural mean pain scores were found to be statistically significantly higher in the control group than in the VRG group (p < .001). A statistically significant but moderate positive correlation was found between the postprocedural pain and preprocedural state anxiety variable (r = 0.477). A statistically significant and strong positive correlation was found between the postprocedural pain and the postprocedural state anxiety variable (r = 0.657). A statistically significant but moderate positive relationship was found between preprocedural and postprocedural state anxiety variables (r = 0.519). ConclusionsWe determined that video streaming with VRG reduces pain and anxiety felt by adult patients during the BMAB procedure. VRG can be recommended to use in controlling pain and anxiety in patients undergoing a BMAB procedure.

Safety profile and technical success rate of computed tomography-guided atlanto-axial lateral articulation injections.

To describe the technique, safety profile, and outcome of computed tomography (CT)-guided atlanto-axial lateral articulation injections performed at our institution. Consecutive cases of all CT-guided atlanto-axial injections performed from January 2017 to April 2022 at our institution were searched in the electronic medical records. Patient charts were reviewed for demographics, characterization of pain, potential altered anatomy, pain level before and immediately after the procedure, procedure technique, complications, and follow-up outcomes, if available. Forty-five injections in 40 different patients were included. The average age was 67.4 years, and 28 (70%) of the patients were female. Of the 45 injections, 43 (96%) were technically successful. The average change in pain score (0-10) from immediately before to immediately after the injection was -3.36 (SD = 2.87, range = -8 to +3). Of all injections, 14 (31%) had a postprocedural pain score of zero. In 2 cases (4%), patients reported an increase in pain score immediately after the injection. In 3 cases (7%), transient non-vertebral artery vascular uptake of contrast was documented during the procedure, which could be cleared with needle repositioning. There were no complications. CT-guided atlanto-axial lateral articulation injection is a safe procedure with a high technical success rate. It allows for direct visualization of vital structures and provides an alternative option to the traditional fluoroscopic guidance, especially in cases of prior technically unsuccessful fluoroscopically guided injection or altered anatomy.

Tumescent local anesthesia versus general anesthesia for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: A cost-effectiveness analysis

General anesthesia (GA) is the standard sedation approach for subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation. Nonetheless, GA is expensive and can be associated with adverse events. Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) has been shown to reduce in-room and procedural times and to decrease postprocedural pain, all of which could result in a reduction in procedure-related costs. The purpose of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of GA and TLA in patients undergoing S-ICD implantation. The present study is a prospective, nonrandomized, controlled study of patients who underwent S-ICD implantation between 2019 and 2022. Patients were allocated to either the TLA or the GA group. We performed a cost analysis for each intervention. As an effectiveness measure, the 0-10 point pain Numeric Rating Scale at 1, 12, and 24 hours postimplantation was analyzed and compared between the groups. A score of 0 was considered no pain; 1-5, mild pain; 6-7, moderate pain; and 8-10, severe pain. Cost-effectiveness was calculated using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Seventy patients underwent successful S-ICD implantation. The total cost of the electrophysiology laboratory was higher in the GA group than in the TLA group (median ± interquartile range $55,824 ± $29,411 vs $37,222 ± $24,293; P < .001), with a net savings of $20,821 when compared with GA for each S-ICD implantation. There was a significant decrease in postprocedural pain scores in the TLA group when compared with the GA group (repeated measures analysis of variance, P = .009; median ± interquartile range 0 ± 3 vs 0 ± 5 at 1 hour, P = .058; 3 ± 4 vs 6 ± 8 at 12 hours, P = .030; 0 ± 4 vs 2 ± 6 at 24 hours, P = .040). TLA is a more cost-effective alternative to GA for S-ICD implantation, with both direct and indirect cost reductions. Importantly, these reduced costs are associated with reduced postprocedural pain.

Sedation for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Elderly Patients – the Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion. A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial

Sedation of elderly patients with associated comorbidities, subjected to ERCP procedure, can produce serious complications including respiratory instability and hemodynamics caused by the administration of anesthetic substances. In this study we aimed to evaluate whether the administration of lidocaine in continuous infusion during ERCP procedure reduces the consumption of propofol and the rate of complications in these patients. 83 patients over 65-year old, ASA II-IV score, undergoing an ERCP procedure were randomized in two groups: lidocaine group (group L) who received 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine 1% and propofol 1mg/kg at induction and then 2 mg/kg lidocaine 1% in continuous infusion during the procedure and control group (group C) who received saline in the same amount as group L and propofol 1mg/kg. The consumption of propofol, intraprocedural complications, the time of awakening and recovery, the quality of postprocedural analgesia, the satisfaction of the endoscopist were registered. Propofol consumption was statistically significantly lower in group L compared to group C [135.37 (±43.23) vs. 214.88 (±51.83), p=0.001]. The same result was obtained related to the awakening time [2.85 (±1.50) vs. 5.38 (±1.36), p=0.001] and recovery time [23.90 (±12.66) vs. 26.17 (±12.41), p<0.001], the episodes of intraprocedural desaturation (p=0.001), the involuntary intraprocedural movements (p=0.001), the endoscopist's satisfaction (p=0.006). No differences were found in terms of post-procedure pain scores (p=0.54). Lidocaine can be administered to reduce the need for propofol, faster awakening and lower intraprocedural complications in elderly patients undergoing the ERCP procedure.

Regional Anesthesia as an Alternative to Moderate Sedation for Perioperative Pain Control for Percutaneous Gastrostomy Tube Placement

Percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement is typically performed under moderate sedation. However, some patients are not ideal candidates for moderate sedation because of respiratory compromise, difficult airways, or other factors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate regional anesthesia as an alternative to moderate sedation. A retrospective review of patients who underwent percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement between March 2014 and September 2020 was performed. Data on patient demographics, anesthesia type, pain scores, and opiate usage were collected. A total of 189 patients were included in the study; 35 (18.5%) received regional anesthesia and 154 received moderate sedation. Patients in the regional anesthesia group tolerated the procedure well, with lower mean immediate postprocedural and maximal pain scores of 0.7 vs 2.2 (P = .011) and 4.3 vs 6.5 (P = .003), respectively. Regional anesthesia is effective at controlling perioperative pain and is an alternative with a low complication rate for patients who cannot tolerate moderate sedation.