Postprandial Glucagon Responses Research Articles

Abnormal late postprandial glucagon response in type 1 diabetes is a function of differences in stimulated C-peptide concentrations.

The functional changes in alpha cells in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) with different residual beta cell functions remain poorly elucidated. The study aimed to investigate the relationship between glucagon secretion and C-peptide levels and to explore the relationship between glucagon response and glucose increment in respond to a secretagogue in a steamed bread meal tolerance test (BMTT) in T1D. The study enrolled 43 adult patients with T1D and 24 healthy control subjects. Patients with T1D who underwent BMTT were divided into two groups based on peak C-peptide levels: C peptide low (CPL; C-peptide < 200 pmol/L; n=14) and high (CPH; C peptide ≥ 200 pmol/L; n=29). Plasma glucose, C-peptide, glucagon levels at 0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min were measured. The glucagon response to the BMTT was defined by areas under the curve (AUC) as early (AUC0-30), late (AUC30-180), or total (AUC0-180) glucagon. Compared to healthy individuals, fasting plasma glucagon was lower and postprandial plasma glucagon level was increased in patients with T1D. Glucagon levels after BMTT between the CPL and CPH group showed significant group by time interaction. Peak glucagon and glucagon at 60-180 min, total and late glucagon response were higher in CPL than CPH group, while fasting glucagon and early glucagon response adjusted for glucose were comparable between CPL and CPH group. The higher late glucagon response and late glucagon response adjusted for glucose were associated with lower peak C-peptide in T1D. The higher late glucagon response and lower peak C-peptide were associated with the higher value of ▵glucose at 180 min. Stimulated C-peptide levels affect the paradoxical increase in postprandial glucagon secretion in patients with T1D, especially late glucagon response. The exaggerated postprandial glucagon secretion further stimulates the elevation of postprandial glucose in patients with T1D.

The ‘early’ postprandial glucagon response is related to the rate of gastric emptying in type 2 diabetes

Gastric emptying (GE) is a major determinant of the postprandial glycemic and insulinemic responses in health and type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the effect of GE on the postprandial glucagon response, which is characteristically augmented in T2D, is unknown. This study examined the relationship between plasma glucagon and GE of a standardized mixed meal in individuals with well-controlled T2D. 89 individuals with T2D (HbA1c 6.6 ± 0.1%) consumed a mashed potato meal labeled with 100 µL 13C-octanoic acid between 0 and 5 min. Venous blood was sampled frequently over 4 h for measurements of blood glucose and plasma glucagon. The gastric half-emptying time (T50) was calculated by quantification of 13C in the breath. Blood glucose peaked at t = 90 min after the meal. Plasma glucagon increased to a peak at t = 30 min and then decreased to a nadir at t = 180 min. The T50 was 68.3 ± 1.6 min. The incremental area under the plasma glucagon curve between t = 0–30 min (glucagon iAUC0–30 min) was related inversely to the T50 (r = −0.23, P = 0.029), while the increase in blood glucose at t = 30 min was related directly to the plasma glucagon iAUC0–30 min (r = 0.25, P = 0.018). Accordingly, individuals with relatively faster GE exhibited higher postprandial glucagon and glucose levels (ANOVA: P<0.01 for each). In well-controlled T2D, the early postprandial glucagon response to a mixed meal is related to the rate of GE, and predictive of the initial glycemic response. These observations suggest that a reduction in plasma glucagon may contribute to the effect of dietary and pharmacological strategies which reduce postprandial glycemia in T2D by slowing GE.

Different post-pancreatectomy glucagon responses to a meal test between surgical approaches.

Residual pancreatic endocrine function is important for maintaining metabolic status after pancreatectomy and is closely related to patient nutritional status and prognosis. In contrast to insulin secretion, the significance of glucagon secretion following pancreatectomy remains unclear. In this study, we assessed the changes in pancreatic glucagon secretion during pancreatectomy to determine their pathophysiological significance. We evaluated glucagon and insulin secretion using a liquid meal tolerance test before and after pancreatectomy in patients scheduled to undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP). After pancreatectomy, fasting plasma glucagon levels were significantly decreased in both the PD (n = 10) and DP (n = 5) groups (PD: from 18.4 to 10.5 pg/mL, p = 0.037; DP: from 21.0 to 12.1 pg/mL, p = 0.043), whereas postprandial plasma glucagon levels were not changed. In the liquid meal tolerance test after pancreatectomy, 60-min plasma glucagon levels and the area under the curve (AUC) for 0-120 min of PD were significantly higher than those for DP (60-min plasma glucagon: PD 49.0 vs. DP 21.7 pg/mL, p = 0.040; AUC0-120min: PD 4,749 vs. DP 3,564 μg min/mL, p = 0.028). Postoperative plasma glucose, serum insulin, and serum C-peptide levels during the liquid meal tolerance test were not significantly different between the two groups. Although fasting plasma glucagon levels decreased, postprandial glucagon responses were maintained after both PD and DP. The difference in residual meal-stimulated glucagon response between PD and DP suggests that a relative excess of postprandial glucagon is involved in the postoperative nutritional status after PD through its impact on systemic metabolic status.

Amylin as a Future Obesity Treatment

Obesity is defined as abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that contributes to detrimental health impacts. One-third of the population suffers from obesity, and it is important to consider obesity as a chronic disease requiring chronic treatment. Amylin is co-secreted with insulin from β pancreatic cells upon nutrient delivery to the small intestine as a satiety signal, acts upon sub-cortical homeostatic and hedonic brain regions, slows gastric emptying, and suppresses post-prandial glucagon responses to meals. Therefore, new pharmacological amylin analogues can be used as potential anti-obesity medications in individuals who are overweight or obese. In this narrative review, we analyse the efficacy, potency, and safety of amylin analogues. The synthetic amylin analogue pramlintide is an approved treatment for diabetes mellitus which promotes better glycaemic control and small but significant weight loss. AM833 (cagrilintide), an investigational novel long-acting acylated amylin analogue, acts as a non-selective amylin receptor. This calcitonin G protein-coupled receptor agonist can serve as an attractive novel treatment for obesity, resulting in reduction of food intake and significant weight loss in a dose-dependent manner.

The liver-alpha-cell axis after a mixed meal and during weight loss in type 2 diabetes.

ObjectiveGlucagon and amino acids may be regulated in a feedback loop called the liver-alpha-cell axis with alanine or glutamine as suggested signal molecules. We assessed this concept in individuals with type 2 diabetes in the fasting state, after ingestion of a protein-rich meal, and during weight loss. Moreover, we investigated if postprandial glucagon secretion and hepatic insulin sensitivity were related.MethodsThis is a secondary analysis of a 12-week weight-loss trial (Paleolithic diet ± exercise) in 29 individuals with type 2 diabetes. Before and after the intervention, plasma glucagon and amino acids were measured in the fasting state and during 180 min after a protein-rich mixed meal. Hepatic insulin sensitivity was measured using the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp with [6,6-2H2]glucose as a tracer.ResultsThe postprandial increase of plasma glucagon was associated with the postprandial increase of alanine and several other amino acids but not glutamine. In the fasted state and after the meal, glucagon levels were negatively correlated with hepatic insulin sensitivity (rS = −0.51/r = −0.58, respectively; both P < 0.05). Improved hepatic insulin sensitivity with weight loss was correlated with decreased postprandial glucagon response (r = −0.78; P < 0.001).ConclusionsSeveral amino acids, notably alanine, but not glutamine could be key signals to the alpha cell to increase glucagon secretion. Amino acids may be part of a feedback mechanism as glucagon increases endogenous glucose production and ureagenesis in the liver. Moreover, postprandial glucagon secretion seems to be tightly related to hepatic insulin sensitivity.

Acute Effects of Cinnamon Spice on Post-prandial Glucose and Insulin in Normal Weight and Overweight/Obese Subjects: A Pilot Study

Clinical studies and meta-analyses have supported the notion that consuming cinnamon spice long term can have beneficial effects in individuals with normal glucose homeostasis and varying degrees of glucose intolerance including type 2 diabetes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the acute effect of cinnamon on the post-prandial responses to a typical American breakfast in normal and overweight/obese participants (ClinicalTrials.gov registration No. NCT04686552). The consumption of a single dose of 6 g of cinnamon added to oatmeal prepared with milk resulted in a significant reduction of one of our primary outcomes post-prandial insulin response (niAUC0−180min) in overweight/obese participants compared to control consuming breakfast without cinnamon. We also performed exploratory analysis of secondary outcomes. In normal weight participants, we observed a decrease of post-prandial glucagon response (niAUC0−180min and glucagon levels at 60–120 min) and C-peptide response (30 min) comparing breakfast with to without cinnamon. Cinnamon consumption did not change post-prandial glycemic response in normal weight participants, but increased 60 min post-prandial glucose in overweight/obese participants compared to control. In summary, cinnamon consumption differentially affected post-prandial hormonal responses in normal and overweight/obese participants.

The GLP-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide reduces postprandial glucose in patients with diabetes secondary to total pancreatectomy: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded crossover trial.

Treatment of diabetes secondary to total pancreatectomy remains a challenge and insulin constitutes the only glucose-lowering treatment for these patients. We hypothesised that the glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist lixisenatide would improve postprandial glucose tolerance in totally pancreatectomised patients. In a double-blinded, randomised, crossover study, 12 totally pancreatectomised individuals (age: 65.0 ± 9.5 mean±SD years; BMI: 22.9 ± 3.9kg/m2) and 12 healthy control individuals (age 66.1 ± 7.6years; BMI: 24.0 ± 2.9kg/m2) underwent two 3h liquid mixed-meal tests (with paracetamol for assessment of gastric emptying) after single-dose injection of 20μg of lixisenatide or placebo. Basal insulin was given the night before each experimental day; no insulin was given during study days. Compared with placebo, lixisenatide reduced postprandial plasma glucose excursions in the pancreatectomy group (baseline-subtracted AUC [bsAUC] [mean±SEM]: 548 ± 125 vs 1447 ± 95mmol/l × min, p < 0.001) and in the control group (-126 ± 12 vs 222 ± 51mmol/l × min, p < 0.001). In the pancreatectomy group a mean peak glucose concentration of 23.3 ± 1.0mmol/l was reached at time point 134 ± 11min with placebo, compared with a mean peak glucose concentration of 18 ± 1.4mmol/l (p = 0.008) at time point 148 ± 13min (p = 0.375) with lixisenatide. In the control group a mean peak concentration of 8.2 ± 0.4mmol/l was reached at time point 70 ± 13min with placebo, compared with a mean peak concentration of 5.5 ± 0.1mmol/l (p < 0.001) at time point 8 ± 25min (p = 0.054) with lixisenatide. Lixisenatide also reduced gastric emptying and postprandial glucagon responses in the pancreatectomy group (66 ± 84 vs 1190 ± 311pmol/l × min, p = 0.008) and in the control group (141 ± 100 vs 190 ± 100pmol/l × min, p = 0.034). In the pancreatectomy group, C-peptide was undetectable in plasma. In the control group, postprandial plasma C-peptide responses were reduced with lixisenatide (18 ± 17 vs 189 ± 31nmol/l × min, p < 0.001). The GLP-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide reduces postprandial plasma glucose excursions in totally pancreatectomised patients. The mode of action seems to involve deceleration of gastric emptying and reduced postprandial responses of gut-derived glucagon. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02640118. This study was funded by an unrestricted investigator-initiated study grant from Sanofi. Support was also received from from the Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, the A.P. Møller Foundation for the Advancement of Medical Science and the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen.

A pre-meal of whey proteins induces differential effects on glucose and lipid metabolism in subjects with the metabolic syndrome: a randomised cross-over trial.

Postprandial lipaemia (PPL), an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, is affected by composition and timing of meals. We evaluated if whey proteins (WP) consumed as a pre-meal before a fat-rich meal reduce postprandial triglyceride (TG) and apolipoprotein B-48 (ApoB-48) responses in subjects with the metabolic syndrome (MeS). An acute, randomised, cross-over trial was conducted. 20 subjects with MeS consumed a pre-meal of 0, 10 or 20g WP 15min prior to a fat-rich meal. The responses of TG and ApoB-48 were assessed. We also analysed postprandial responses of free fatty acids (FFA), glucose, insulin, glucagon, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and paracetamol (reflecting gastric emptying rates). WP pre-meal did not alter the TG or ApoB-48 responses. In contrast, the insulin response was more pronounced after a pre-meal of 20g WP than with 10g WP (P = 0.0005) and placebo (P < 0.0001). Likewise, the postprandial glucagon response was greater with a pre-meal of 20g WP than with 10g WP (P < 0.0001) and 0g WP (P < 0.0001). A pre-meal with 20g of WP generated lower glucose (P = 0.0148) and S-paracetamol responses (P = 0.0003) and a higher GLP-1 response (P = 0.0086) than placebo. However, the pre-meal did not influence responses of GIP, FFA or appetite assessed by a Visual Analog Scale. Consumption of a WP pre-meal prior to a fat-rich meal did not affect TG and chylomicron responses. In contrast, the WP pre-meal stimulates insulin and glucagon secretion and reduces blood glucose as expected, and delays gastric emptying. Consequently, our study points to a differential impact of a WP pre-meal on lipid and glucose metabolism to a fat-rich meal in subjects with MeS.

PANCREATIC AND EXTRA-PANCREATIC EFFECTS OF INCRETINS AND PERSPECTIVES FOR STUDYING ENTEROINSULIN HORMONAL SYSTEM DURING GESTATIONAL DISORDER OF CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM

The absence of an ideal medicine for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes, that would be able to provide not only high quality and constant monitoring of glycemia without increasing body weight, with no risk of hypoglycemia, with no negative impact on the heart, kidneys, liver, but could also ensure the preservation of the secretory function of β-cells, makes scientists continue to search for new opportunities to influence the occurrence and progression of T2D.Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) are the two primary incretin hormones secreted from the intestine on ingestion of glucose or nutrients to stimulate insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells. Within the pancreas, GIP and GLP-1 together promote β-cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis, thereby expanding pancreatic β-cell mass, while GIP enhances postprandial glucagon response and GLP-1 suppresses it. In adipose tissues, GIP but not GLP-1 facilitates fat deposition. In bone, GIP promotes bone formation while GLP-1 inhibits bone absorption. In the brain, both GIP and GLP-1 are thought to be involved in memory formation as well as the control of appetite. In addition to these differences, secretion of GIP and GLP-1 and their insulinotropic effects on β-cells have been shown to differ in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to healthy subjects.Enteroinsulin hormones' role in the development of gestational disorder of carbohydrate metabolism is poorly understood.In a review article we analyze the publications that summarize what is known about the pancreatic and extra-pancreatic GIP and GLP-1-effects compared with healthy subjects and type 2 diabetes patients. The aspects of gestational diabetes pathophysiology and the perspectives for studying enteroinsulin hormonal system during pregnancy are also discussed in the article.

Thirty days of resveratrol supplementation does not affect postprandial incretin hormone responses, but suppresses postprandial glucagon in obese subjects

Resveratrol, a natural polyphenolic compound produced by various plants (e.g. red grapes) and found in red wine, has glucose-lowering effects in humans and rodent models of obesity and/or diabetes. The mechanisms behind these effects have been suggested to include resveratrol-induced secretion of the gut incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1. We investigated postprandial incretin hormone and glucagon responses in obese human subjects before and after 30 days of resveratrol supplementation. Postprandial plasma responses of the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon were evaluated in 10 obese men [subjects characteristics (mean ± standard error of the mean): age 52 ± 2 years; BMI 32 ± 1 kg/m(2), fasting plasma glucose 5.5 ± 0.1 mmol/l] who had been given a dietary supplement of resveratrol (Resvida(®) 150 mg/day) or placebo for 30 days in a randomized, double-blind, crossover design with a 4-week washout period. At the end of each intervention period a standardized meal test (without co-administration of resveratrol) was performed. Resveratrol supplementation had no impact on fasting plasma concentrations or postprandial plasma responses (area under curve values) of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (11.2 ± 2.1 vs. 11.8 ± 2.2 pmol/l, P = 0.87; 17.0 ± 2.2 vs. 14.8 ± 1.6 min × nmol/l, P = 0.20) or glucagon-like peptide-1 (15.4 ± 1.0 vs. 15.2 ± 0.9 pmol/l, P = 0.84; 5.6 ± 0.4 vs. 5.7 ± 0.3 min × nmol/l, P = 0.73). Resveratrol supplementation significantly suppressed postprandial glucagon responses (4.4 ± 0.4 vs. 3.9 ± 0.4 min × nmol/l, P = 0.01) without affecting fasting glucagon levels (15.2 ± 2.2 vs. 14.5 ± 1.5 pmol/l, P = 0.56). Our data suggest that 30 days of resveratrol supplementation does not affect fasting or postprandial incretin hormone plasma levels in obese humans, but suppresses postprandial glucagon responses.

Early postprandial glucagon surge affects postprandial glucose levels in obese and non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes

Postprandial glucagon secretion was shown to be dysregulated in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, the differences in secretory patterns between obese and non-obese patients and their physiological effects on plasma glucose levels are not fully understood. This study population consisted of 21 (10 obese and 11 non-obese) consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes admitted for glycemic control. A 3-hour mixed-meal tolerance test was performed after glycemic control improved. Six non-diabetic subjects were also enrolled in the test. Postprandial glucagon levels increased after 30 min in diabetic patients but not in non-diabetic subjects. The glucagon levels in obese diabetic patients were significantly higher than those in non-obese diabetic patients, while the percent values of postprandial glucagon levels were not different between these groups. In diabetic patients, there were significant positive correlations between the percent value at 30 min and the early postprandial glucose levels at 0, 15 and 30 min and the areas under the curve (AUC0-30 and AUC30-90). Interestingly, the ratio of this percent glucagon value to the C-peptide level at 30 min was significantly associated with the late half of the postprandial glucose levels at 90, 120, 150 and 180 min and the AUC90-180. This is the first report that demonstrates the glucagon secretory patterns and the close correlations in detailed time course between the early postprandial glucagon response and the early and the late half of the postprandial glucose levels in obese and non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Do the Actions of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 on Gastric Emptying, Appetite, and Food Intake Involve Release of Amylin in Humans?

Amylin, cosecreted with insulin, has like glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) been reported to inhibit glucagon secretion, delay gastric emptying, and reduce appetite and food intake. We investigated whether the effects of GLP-1 on gastric emptying, appetite, and food intake are mediated directly or indirectly via release of amylin. Eleven C-peptide and amylin-negative patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and 12 matched healthy controls participated in a placebo-controlled, randomized, single-blinded, crossover study. With glucose clamped between 6 and 9 mm, near-physiological infusions of GLP-1, human amylin, pramlintide, or saline were given for 270 min during and after a fixed meal. Gastric emptying was measured using paracetamol, appetite using visual analog scales, and food intake during a subsequent ad libitum meal (at 240 min). In T1DM, gastric emptying, food intake, and appetite were reduced equally during low GLP-1 and amylin infusion compared with the saline infusion (P < 0.05). The controls showed stronger suppression of gastric emptying (P < 0.0001) and food intake (P < 0.01) with GLP-1 compared to amylin. Postprandial glucagon responses were reduced in controls and T1DM during GLP-1 and amylin infusions (P < 0.05). Amylin and pramlintide infusion had similar effects. GLP-1 exerts its effect on gastric emptying, appetite, food intake, and glucagon secretion directly, although secretion of amylin may contribute to some of these effects in healthy control subjects.

GIP and GLP‐1, the two incretin hormones: Similarities and differences

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) are the two primary incretin hormones secreted from the intestine on ingestion of glucose or nutrients to stimulate insulin secretion from pancreatic β cells. GIP and GLP-1 exert their effects by binding to their specific receptors, the GIP receptor (GIPR) and the GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R), which belong to the G-protein coupled receptor family. Receptor binding activates and increases the level of intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate in pancreatic β cells, thereby stimulating insulin secretion glucose-dependently. In addition to their insulinotropic effects, GIP and GLP-1 play critical roles in various biological processes in different tissues and organs that express GIPR and GLP-1R, including the pancreas, fat, bone and the brain. Within the pancreas, GIP and GLP-1 together promote β cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis, thereby expanding pancreatic β cell mass, while GIP enhances postprandial glucagon response and GLP-1 suppresses it. In adipose tissues, GIP but not GLP-1 facilitates fat deposition. In bone, GIP promotes bone formation while GLP-1 inhibits bone absorption. In the brain, both GIP and GLP-1 are thought to be involved in memory formation as well as the control of appetite. In addition to these differences, secretion of GIP and GLP-1 and their insulinotropic effects on β cells have been shown to differ in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to healthy subjects. We summarize here the similarities and differences of these two incretin hormones in secretion and metabolism, their insulinotropic action on pancreatic β cells, and their non-insulinotropic effects, and discuss their potential in treatment of type 2 diabetes. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2010.00022.x, 2010).

Octreotide long-term treatment in patients with portal hypertension: persistent inhibition of postprandial glucagon response without major changes in renal function

Background/Aims: Octreotide acutely decreases splanchnic blood flow and postprandial portal pressure in patients with portal hypertension. Inhibition of glucagon release parallels the hemodynamic changes. We studied the hormonal and renal effects of long-term treatment with octreotide (100 μg s.c., ti.i.d., immediately before meals, for 2 weeks) in 12 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Methods: Postprandial blood levels of glucagon, insulin and glucose, and renal function tests were monitored in a study where patients acted as their own controls. Eleven patients completed the study, octreotide being discontinued in one patient who developed jaundice after 6 days of therapy. Results: Long-term treatment did not cause any change in fasting hormonal levels measured 12 h after the last injection of octreotide. However, pre-prandial injection of octreotide induced a marked fall in blood glucagon (163±49 pg/ml, after 20 min, vs. 254±71 pg/ml, basal; p<0.01), thus preventing the postprandial response occurring without treatment (322±102 pg/ml, 30 min-peak, vs. 249±77 pg/ml, basal; p<0.03). Inhibition of postprandial glucagon was maintained after 2 weeks of therapy (159±33 pg/ml, after 20 min, vs. 237±54 pg/ml, basal; p<0.01). Octreotide abolished the insulin postprandial response with no major change in glycemic control. Treatment had no longer-term effect on renal plasma flow (effective renal plasma flow: 596±79 ml/min, baseline, vs. 609±71 ml/min, at 2 weeks; p > 0.5), glomerular filtration rate (glomerular filtration rate; 99±11 vs. 99±12 ml/min; p > 0.5), blood urea and creatinine, whereas it induced a mild decrease in plasma electrolyte levels ( p<0.02). Conclusions: Long-term octreotide treatment persistently suppresses the postprandial glucagon response of patients with portal hypertension without causing deterioration in their renal function.

Glucagon-Like Peptide I Enhances the Insulinotropic Effect of Glibenclamide in NIDDM Patients and in the Perfused Rat Pancreas

To investigate the acute effects of glibenclamide and glucagon-like peptide I (GLP-I) and their combination in perfused isolated rat pancreas and in patients with secondary failure to sulfonylureas. Rat islets were perfused with 10 nmol/l GLP-I in combination with 2 mumol/l glibenclamide. In human experiments, GLP-I (0.75 pmol. kg-1.min-1) was given as a continuous infusion during 240 min, while glibenclamide (3.5 mg) was administered orally. Eight patients participated in the study (age 57.6 +/- 2.7 years, BMI 28.7 +/- 1.5 kg/m2, mean +/- SE). In all subjects, blood glucose was first normalized by insulin infusion administered by an artificial pancreas (Biostator). GLP-I increased the insulinotropic effect of glibenclamide fourfold in the perfused rat pancreas. In human experiments, treatment with GLP-I alone and in combination with glibenclamide significantly decreased basal glucose levels (5.1 +/- 0.4 and 4.5 +/- 0.1 vs. 6.0 +/- 0.3 mmol/l, P < 0.01), while with only glibenclamide, glucose concentrations remained unchanged. GLP-I markedly decreased total integrated glucose response to the meal (353 +/- 60 vs. 724 +/- 91 mmol.l-1. min-1, area under the curve [AUC] [-30-180 min], P < 0.02), whereas glibenclamide had no effect (598 +/- 101 mmol.l-1. min-1, AUC [-30-180 min], NS). The combined treatment further enhanced the glucose lowering effect of GLP-I (138 +/- 24 mmol. l-1.min, AUC [-30-180 min], P < 0.001). GLP-I, glibenclamide, and combined treat-stimulated meal-induced insulin release as reflected by insulinogenic indexes (control 1.44 +/- 0.4; GLP-I 6.3 +/- 1.6, P < 0.01; glibenclamide 6.8 +/- 2.1, P < 0.01; combination 20.7 +/- 5.0, P < 0.001). GLP-I inhibited basal but not postprandial glucagon responses. Using paracetamol as a marker for gastric emptying rate of the test meal, treatment with GLP-I decreased gastric emptying at 180 min by approximately 50% compared with the control subjects (P < 0.01). In acute experiments on overweight patients with NIDDM, GLP-I exerted a marked antidiabetogenic action on the basal and postprandial state. The peptide stimulated insulin, suppressed basal glucagon release, and prolonged gastric emptying. The glucose-lowering effect of GLP-I was further enhanced by glibenclamide. This action may be at least partially accounted for by a synergistic effect of these two compounds on insulin release. Glibenclamide per se enhanced postprandial but not basal insulin release and exerted a less pronounced antidiabetogenic effect compared with GLP-I.

Effect of 15-day treatment with octreotide on postprandial glucagon response in patients with liver cirrhosis

Effect of 15-day treatment with octreotide on postprandial glucagon response in patients with liver cirrhosis

Effect of bombesin upon plasma somatostatin-like immunoreactivity, insulin and glucagon in normal and chemically sympathectomized dogs

The present study was designed to determine the effects of intravenously infused bombesin (10 ng/kg/min) upon basal and postprandial plasma somatostatin-like immunoreactivity (SLI), glucagon, insulin and triglyceride levels in normal ( n = 12 ) and chemically sympathectomized ( n = 11 ) dogs. Basal plasma SLI, glucagon and insulin levels rose significantly during the infusion of bombesin in the normal dogs, and this was not altered by chemical sympathectomy. Bombesin infusion enhanced the postprandial SLI response, while attenuating the postprandial glucagon response by 50% and the insulin response in the earlt postprandial phase of the meal. Sympathectomy did not significantly alter the basal levels of these polypeptides, but augmented the postprandial plasma SLI response during the first 90 min, and reduced the postprandial glucagon response during the infusion of bombesin. The postprandial insulin response was not affected by sympathectomy. In both normal and chemically sympathectomized dogs the rise in postprandial triglyceride levels was attenuated by bombesin infusion.