Postpancreatectomy Hemorrhage Research Articles

Delayed postpancreatectomy hemorrhage as the role of endovascular approach: Four case reports

Delayed postpancreatectomy hemorrhage as the role of endovascular approach: Four case reports

Packing of the Gastroduodenal Artery Stump Using Falciform Ligament During Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Pseudoaneurysm formation is a potentially fatal complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy. We developed a packing method in which the gastroduodenal artery stump is packed inside a falciform ligament to reduce the post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage due to pseudoaneurysm formation. This study aimed to evaluate its efficacy. This study included 210 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomies between January 2007 and December 2023. The study population was divided into two groups; the packing group (n=110) and the no-packing group (n=100), and the clinical variables were compared between the two groups. Pseudoaneurysms were observed in six (2.9%) patients, and post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage was observed in four (1.9%) patients. There was no significant difference in pseudoaneurysm formation between the packing and no-packing groups (p=0.477), and the mortality rates for both pseudoaneurysm and post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage were zero. Two patients in the no-packing group were found to have shock, whereas four patients in the packing group (n=4) did not. Additionally, we encountered a 6 cm unruptured pseudoaneurysm following packing. The packing method did not reduce pseudoaneurysm formation after pancreaticoduodenectomy, but may prevent pseudoaneurysm rupture.

Preoperative risk-stratified analysis: External versus internal pancreatic stents in pancreatoduodenectomy

BackgroundSeveral risk-stratified studies have compared the outcomes of external and internal pancreatic stents in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), but no resolute standard for a fistula-mitigation strategy exists. The study investigated the efficacy of these stents in a preoperative risk-stratified setting. MethodsData from 285 patients who underwent PD with pancreaticojejunostomy using an external or internal stent from 2015 to 2023 were analyzed. The preoperative pancreatic fistula score (preFRS) was used to classify patients into low-risk (preFRS: 0–5) and high-risk (preFRS: 6–8) groups. ResultsPreFRS accurately predicted the risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) as 0% and >40% in patients with preFRS ≤1 and ≥7, respectively. Although no significant difference was observed in postoperative outcomes in low-risk patients, the external stent significantly reduced CR-POPF (21% vs 44%, P = .024) and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH, 0% vs 19%, P = .02) in high-risk patients, leading to the superiority of the external stent in the entire cohort in terms of CR-POPF (12% vs 24%, P = .033) and PPH (1% vs 11%, P = .013). There were no significant differences in stent-related complications or pancreatic dysfunction. External stent malfunction occurred in 14% and significantly affected CR-POPF development in both low- (20% vs 0%, P < .01) and high-risk groups (60% vs 14%, P = .021). ConclusionThe external pancreatic stent showed a more beneficial effect on CR-POPF and PPH, especially in high-risk patients, without increasing other complications. Risk-stratified strategy and improving stent management might enhance postoperative outcomes.

Combined Division of the Splenic Vessels and Pancreatic Parenchyma during Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy is a Safe Alternative to Separate Division: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study

BackgroundLimited data exists regarding the safety and outcomes of combined division of the splenic vessels with the pancreatic parenchyma during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). This study aims to evaluate the combined division technique. MethodsPatients who underwent LDP for pancreatic cancer from April 2011 to December 2022 were reviewed and categorized into the following groups: combined (CV) versus separate (SV) division of the splenic vein; combined (CA) versus separate (SA) division of the splenic artery; and combined (CAV) versus separate (SAV) division of the splenic artery and vein, with or without the pancreatic parenchyma. Comparisons were made regarding operative and postoperative outcomes. ResultsAmong the 80 patients included, 44 underwent CV and 36 underwent SV. Operative time and major morbidity were significantly lower in CV compared with SV. Similar findings were observed in CAV versus SAV, as well as lower blood loss in CAV. Operative time was significantly lower in CA versus SA. Pancreatic fistula and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage rates showed no significant differences between groups. No patient developed splenic arteriovenous fistula in follow-up. DiscussionCombined division of the splenic vessels with the pancreatic parenchyma during LDP is safe and associated with improved outcomes compared with separate division.

Drainage and irrigation on demand may decrease severe septic complications and mortality in pancreatic resections.

The necessity of routine drain placement in pancreatic resections is controversial. Some randomized controlled trials have shown that the omission of drainage is safe for some patients, whereas reintervention rates and mortality rates are substantial for others. The present study aimed to assess fistula-associated outcomes in the setting of routine drain placement and drain irrigation on demand. Between 01/2017 and 12/2022, perioperative and outcome data from patients who underwent consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies (PD, n = 253) or distal pancreatectomies (DP, n = 72) were prospectively collected in the electronic StuDoQ database and analysed. All patients underwent intraoperative drain placement. Drains were removed starting at postoperative day 2 in PD or at day 5 in DP after testing for amylase concentration. In case of high amylase levels or macroscopically suspicious pancreatic fistulas, drain irrigation was started. Nondrained fluid collections underwent percutaneous radiologic or transluminal endoscopic evacuation. Clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas were detected in 53 of 325 patients (POPF grade B 16.3%, grade C 1.2%). 43.3% of those had drain irrigation. Additional interventional or endoscopic drainage was necessary in 14 and 5 patients, respectively (overall 5.8%), and were observed in 4.0% of patients with PD and in 12.5% with DP (p = 0.009). Delayed fistula-associated postpancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH) was present in 1.2% (4/325) of patients. The fistula- and delayed PPH-associated reoperation rate was 1.5% (5/325). The 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates were both 1.5% (5/325), and the rate of fistula-associated mortality was 0.6% (2/325). The overall 90-day mortality rate was 4.5%. In pancreatectomies, a standardized drainage protocol including on-demand drain irrigation results in very low fistula-associated morbidity and mortality and an infrequent need for interventional or surgical reintervention as compared to previously published drainage studies.

Dunking Pancreaticojejunostomy With Braun's Jejunojejunostomy: Perioperative Outcomes of a Hundred Pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Background The optimal surgical technique for pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is still debated. Dunking and duct-to-mucosa PJ are the most commonly adopted techniques. Incorporating Braun's jejunojejunostomy (JJ) could reducetheincidence and severity of delayed gastric emptying (DGE). This retrospective descriptive study seeks to clarify the outcomes of dunking PJ with Braun's JJ in 100 PD patients. Methodology We retrospectively reviewed 100 patients who underwent PDs in a single unit of the Department of Surgical Gastroenterology of Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital from October 2012 to February 2023. Demographic and historical data, indications, procedure-related data, complications, and mortality data were collected and analyzed. Results The mean age was 50.96 ± 14.97 years, and 64 (64%) were males. The most common indication was ampullary carcinoma (53, 53%) followed by distal cholangiocarcinoma (18, 18%) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (7, 7%). Operative time was 5.83 ± 1.09 hours, intraoperative blood loss was 515 ± 194 mL, and the average time for PJ and Braun's JJ was 22 ± 6 and 15 ± 3 minutes, respectively. Soft pancreas was encountered in 52 (52%) patients and clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistula (Grade B, C) was seen in 23 (23%). Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage was seen in 21 (21%) patients (Grades A: 3, B: 12, C: 6). DGE (Grade B) occurred in two (2%) patients, and bile leak was observed in 4% of patients (Grades A: 1, B: 2, C: 1). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥IIIA) occurred in 24%, and 11 patients died. Conclusions The dunking technique is easily adaptable, less time-consuming, and can be performed in the pancreas of any texture or duct size but is associated with an increased incidence of post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage. Incorporation of Braun's anastomosis lowers DGE, allows early initiation of feeding, and reduces complication rates.

SP4.3 - Pancreatoduodenectomy for malignancy with concomitant arterial resection: results from the Recurrence After Whipple’s (RAW) study

Abstract Background Most centres are reluctant to perform pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with concomitant arterial resection (AR) in patients with a cancer affecting the pancreatic head. This is because outcomes are poor and the potential benefits of an aggressive resection are unlikely to outweigh the potential risks, particularly in a patient with an aggressive tumour and limited life expectance. AR has been shown to correlate with higher rates of morbidity, reoperation and mortality, and reduced overall survival. However, AR may be justified in selected patients in specialist centres. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of PD patients who underwent AR to those who did not. Methods Data were extracted from the Recurrence After Whipple’s (RAW) study, a multicentre retrospective cohort study of outcomes of PD performed for pancreatic head malignancy (29 centres from eight countries, n=1484). Patients who underwent AR were identified and compared to those who did not undergo AR using the chi-squared test. The following were compared: length of stay (LoS), incidence of postpancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH), and rates of unplanned return to theatre, 30-day readmission, 90-day mortality, and five-year survival. Results Out of 1484 patients, 8.8% did not have data regarding their AR status recorded so they were excluded. Of the rest, 25 (1.8%) underwent AR. Despite the small sample size, these patients had significantly higher rates of PPH (20.0 vs 5.9%, p=0.0004) and reduced five-year survival (12.0% vs 33.1%, p=0.03). Conclusion AR should be reserved for selected PD patients in specialist units. Despite our small sample size, our multicentre study demonstrated that these patients have higher incidence of PPH and reduced long-term survival

The efficacy and safety of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery vs. conventional five-port laparoscopic surgery for duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection.

Single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (SILDPPHR+1) is yet to be reported, and therefore, its safety and efficacy have yet to be established. This study aimed to assess the short-term efficacy of SILDPPHR+1 in comparison to conventional laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (cLDPPHR). Consecutive patients who underwent SILDPPHR+1 and cLDPPHR procedures were screened. An analysis of the intraoperative and postoperative data of all patients was carried out. Nineteen patients who underwent SILDPPHR+1 and 24 patients who underwent cLDPPHR at Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital from October 15, 2021, to October 30, 2023, were enrolled in this study. All baseline parameters of both groups were comparable. There was a statistically significant difference in the cosmetic score between the groups (P<0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding postoperative recovery, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), bile leakage rate, delayed gastric emptying (DGE) rate, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) rate, abdominal infection rate, or textbook outcomes. SILDPPHR+1 appears to be a reliable and safe procedure for certain patients, with no increase in the operating time or complications, similar to the results of cLDPPHR. Moreover, SILDPPHR+1 offers the added advantage of superior cosmetic results.

Outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy for octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundAn increasing number of elderly patients are being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, with increasing need to consider pancreatic surgery. This study aims to provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians. MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was performed via a search of Medline, PubMed and Cochrane databases. Studies comparing outcomes of patients >80 years to younger patients undergoing PD were included. Results26 studies were included. This included 22481 patients, with 20134 (89.6%) aged <80 years old, and 2347 (10.4%) octogenarians. Octogenarians were associated with higher rates of mortality (OR 2.37 (95%CI 1.91-2.94, p < 0.00001)), all-cause morbidity (OR 1.60 (95%CI 1.30-1.96), p<0.00001) and re-operation (OR 1.41 (95%CI 1.13-1.75), p = 0.002). Octogenarians had a two-fold risk of cardiac complications and respiratory complications (OR 2.13 (95%CI 1.67-2.73), p < 0.00001), (OR 2.38 (95%CI 1.72-3.27), p < 0.0001). There was no difference in postoperative pancreatic fistula, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage or delayed gastric emptying. Younger patients were more likely to return to adjuvant therapy (OR 0.20 (95%CI 0.12-0.34), p < 0.00001). ConclusionsOctogenerians are associated with higher mortality rate, postoperative complications, and reduced likelihood to undergo adjuvant therapy. Careful preoperative assessment and selection of elderly patients for consideration of pancreatic surgery is essential.

Surgical Outcome After Distal Pancreatectomy With and Without Portomesenteric Venous Resection in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Transatlantic Evaluation of Patients in North America, Germany, Sweden, and The Netherlands (GAPASURG)

BackgroundPancreatic adenocarcinoma located in the pancreatic body might require a portomesenteric venous resection (PVR), but data regarding surgical risks after distal pancreatectomy (DP) with PVR are sparse. Insight into additional surgical risks of DP-PVR could support preoperative counseling and intraoperative decision making. This study aimed to provide insight into the surgical outcome of DP-PVR, including its potential risk elevation over standard DP.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, multicenter study including all patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent DP ± PVR (2018–2020), registered in four audits for pancreatic surgery from North America, Germany, Sweden, and The Netherlands. Patients who underwent concomitant arterial and/or multivisceral resection(s) were excluded. Predictors for in-hospital/30-day major morbidity and mortality were investigated by logistic regression, correcting for each audit.ResultsOverall, 2924 patients after DP were included, of whom 241 patients (8.2%) underwent DP-PVR. Rates of major morbidity (24% vs. 18%; p = 0.024) and post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage grade B/C (10% vs. 3%; p = 0.041) were higher after DP-PVR compared with standard DP. Mortality after DP-PVR and standard DP did not differ significantly (2% vs. 1%; p = 0.542). Predictors for major morbidity were PVR (odds ratio [OR] 1.500, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.086–2.071) and conversion from minimally invasive to open surgery (OR 1.420, 95% CI 1.032–1.970). Predictors for mortality were higher age (OR 1.087, 95% CI 1.045–1.132), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 4.167, 95% CI 1.852–9.374), and conversion from minimally invasive to open surgery (OR 2.919, 95% CI 1.197–7.118), whereas concomitant PVR was not associated with mortality.ConclusionsPVR during DP for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the pancreatic body is associated with increased morbidity, but can be performed safely in terms of mortality.

Prevention of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy by wrapping ligamentum teres hepatis surrounding hepatic portal artery

Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is an important risk factor for postoperative complications after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). Recent studies have reported that the use of ligamentum teres hepatis (LTH) in LPD may reduce the risk of PPH. Therefore, this study aims to investigate whether wrapping the hepatic hilar artery with the LTH can reduce PPH after LPD. We reviewed the data of 131 patients who underwent LPD in our team from April 2018 to December 2023. The patients were divided into Groups A (60 patients) and B (71 patients) according to whether the hepatic portal artery was wrapped or not. The perioperative data of the two groups were compared to evaluate the effect of LTH wrapping the hepatic hilar artery on LPD. The platelet count of Group A was (225.25 ± 87.61) × 10^9/L, and that of Group B was (289.38 ± 127.35) × 10^9/L, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). The operation time of group A [300.00 (270.00, 364.00)] minutes was shorter than that of group B [330.00 (300.00, 360.00)] minutes, p = 0.037. In addition, A set of postoperative hospital stay [12.00 (10.00, 15.00)] days shorter than group B [15.00 (12.00, 19.50)] days, p < 0.001. No PPH occurred in Group A, while 8 patients in Group B had PPH (7 cases of gastroduodenal artery hemorrhage and 1 case of proper hepatic artery hemorrhage), p = 0.019. The new technique of wrapping the hepatic hilar artery through the LTH can effectively reduce the occurrence of PPH after LPD.

Learning curve stratified outcomes after robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: International multicenter experience

BackgroundRobotic pancreatoduodenectomy is increasingly being implemented worldwide, with good results reported from individual expert centers. However, it is unclear to what extent outcomes will continue to improve during the learning curve, as large international studies are lacking. MethodsAn international retrospective multicenter case series, including consecutive patients after robotic pancreatoduodenectomy from 18 centers in 8 countries in Europe, Asia, and South America until December 31, 2019, was conducted. A cumulative sum analysis was performed to determine the inflection points for the feasibility (operative time and blood loss) and proficiency (postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C and major morbidity) learning curves. Outcomes were compared in 3 groups on the basis of the learning curve inflection points. ResultsOverall, 2,186 patients after robotic pancreatoduodenectomy were included. The feasibility learning curve was reached after 30–45 robotic pancreatoduodenectomy procedures and the proficiency learning curve after 90 robotic pancreatoduodenectomy procedures. These inflection points created 3 phases, which were associated with major morbidity (24.7%, 23.4%, and 12.3%, P < .001) but not 30-day mortality (2.1%, 2.0%, and 1.5%, P = .670). Other outcomes mostly continued to improve, including median operative time 432, 390, and 300 minutes (P < .0001), conversion 6.0%, 4.7%, and 2.7% (P = .002), bile leakage 7.2%, 4.1%, and 2.4% (P < .001), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage 6.5%, 6.1%, and 1.8% (n = 21) but not R0 resection (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma only) 78.5%, 73.9%, and 82.8% (P = .35), and 90-day mortality rate 3.1%, 3.5%, and 2.1% (P = .191). Centers performing >20 robotic pancreatoduodenectomies annually had lower rates of conversion, reoperation, and shorter median operative time as compared with centers performing 10–20 robotic pancreatoduodenectomies annually. ConclusionThis international multicenter study demonstrates that most outcomes of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy continued to improve during 3 learning curve phases without a negative effect on 90-day mortality. Randomized studies are needed in high-volume centers that have surpassed the first learning curves, to compare these outcomes with the open approach.

A comparison of laparoscopic to open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma by propensity score matching analysis

ObjectiveIn previous studies, laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) has demonstrated safety and potential benefits over open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). After performing both LPD and OPD procedures interchangeably in routine practice for a decade, the outcomes of LPD versus OPD for PDAC were analyzed and compared at a single institution. Our primary aim was to compare features of LPD and OPD in PDAC patients so that the suitable surgical approach may be chosen for each individual. MethodsFrom January 2010 through December 2020, all patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) were identified, and information was collected prospectively. At a single institution, PD was performed on 589 patients, of whom 347 were OPD patients and 242 were LPD patients. After excluding those who underwent pancreatectomy for indications other than PDAC, total pancreatectomy, major vascular or concomitant organ resection, there were 237 patients (OPD = 157, LPD = 80). Then propensity score matching was completed to analyze 77 OPD patients versus 77 LPD patients to create a similar group of patients who underwent either LPD or OPD for PDAC. A comparison of perioperative data and 90-day outcomes with subsequent statistical analysis was performed. ResultsOperative time (491 min vs. 281 min, p < 0.001) was longer for LPD than OPD. The rates of pancreatic fistula (11.7% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001) and delayed gastric emptying (15.6% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.027) were higher for LPD than OPD respectively but overall morbidity was similar. Blood loss, mortality and post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage were also similar for both groups, but total costs ($60,245 vs. $50,900, p = 0.002) were significantly higher for LPD than OPD. Recurrence and overall survival were similar for the two groups. ConclusionIn our experience, LPD does not offer any advantages over OPD for PDAC and is associated with a higher rate of complications and costs.

Development and validation of a novel predictive model for postpancreatectomy hemorrhage using lasso-logistic regression: an international multicenter observational study of 9,631 pancreatectomy patients.

Hemorrhage following pancreatectomy represents a grave complication, exerting a significant impact on patient prognosis. The formulation of a precise predictive model for postpancreatectomy hemorrhage risk holds substantial importance in enhancing surgical safety and improving patient outcomes. This study utilized the patient cohort from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, who underwent pancreatectomy between 2014 and 2017 (n=5779), as the training set to establish the Lasso-logistic model. For external validation, a patient cohort (n=3852) from the Chinese National Multicenter Database of Pancreatectomy Patients, who underwent the procedure between 2014 and 2020, was employed. A predictive nomogram for postpancreatectomy hemorrhage was developed, and polynomial equations were extracted. The performance of the predictive model was assessed through the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. In the training and validation cohorts, 9.0% (520/5779) and 8.5% (328/3852) of patients, respectively, experienced postpancreatectomy hemorrhage. Following selection via lasso and logistic regression, only nine predictive factors were identified as independent risk factors associated with postpancreatectomy hemorrhage. These included five preoperative indicators (BMI, ASA ≥3, preoperative obstructive jaundice, chemotherapy within 90 days before surgery, and radiotherapy within 90 days before surgery), two intraoperative indicators (total operation time, vascular resection), and two postoperative indicators (postoperative septic shock, pancreatic fistula). The new model demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87 in the external validation cohort. Its predictive performance significantly surpassed that of the previous five postpancreatectomy hemorrhage risk prediction models (P<0.001, likelihood ratio test). The Lasso-logistic predictive model we developed, constructed from nine rigorously selected variables, accurately predicts the risk of PPH. It has the potential to significantly enhance the safety of pancreatectomy surgeries and improve patient outcomes.

Efficacy of the two-parts wrapping technique in reducing postoperative complications in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

The advancement of laparoscopic technology has broadened the application of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) for treating pancreatic head and ampullary tumors. Despite its benefits, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) remain significant complications. Ligamentum teres hepatis wrapping around the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) stump show limitations in reducing POPF and PPH. This study retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing LPD from January 2016 to October 2023, We compared the effectiveness of the two-parts wrapping (the ligamentum teres hepatis wrapping of the gastroduodenal artery stump and the omentum flap wrapping of the pancreatojejunal anastomosis) and ligamentum teres hepatis wrapping around the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) in reducing postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), using propensity score matching for the analysis. A total of 172 patients were analyzed, showing that the two-parts wrapping group significantly reduced the rates of overall and severe complications, POPF, and PPH compared to ligamentum teres hepatis wrapping around the GDA group. Specifically, the study found lower rates of grade B/C POPF and no instances of PPH in the two-parts wrapping group, alongside shorter postoperative hospital stays and drainage removal times. These benefits were particularly notable in patients with soft pancreatic textures and pancreatic duct diameters of < 3mm. The two-parts wrapping technique significantly reduce the risks of POPF and PPH in LPD, offering a promising approach for patients with soft pancreas and pancreatic duct diameter of < 3mm.

Interim analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with or without preservation of splenic vessels: a randomised controlled trial.

Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) is a widely adopted surgical approach for benign and low-grade malignant neoplasms of the distal pancreas. The Kimura and Warshaw techniques represent two principal strategies, yet it still needs to be determined which one is superior. Our investigation aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with each technique. This single-center, parallel-group, patient-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at the XXXXX University. Stratified block randomization was utilized to enroll 114 patients starting in March 2022, with an interim analysis of short-term outcomes scheduled after 45%-50% of participant enrollment. Patients were randomized to receive LSPDP via either the Kimura or Warshaw technique. The primary endpoint was intraoperative blood loss, while secondary endpoints included a range of outcomes from composite outcome to quality of life, as quantified by the EQ-5D-5L. From March 2022 to November 2023, 53 patients were randomly allocated to the Kimura (n=25) or Warshaw (n=28) groups for LSPDP. Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were similar between the groups, such as pancreatic fistula incidence, EQ-5D-5L index scores, and delayed gastric emptying rates. Per-protocol (PP) analysis revealed that the Kimura group experienced significantly less blood loss (52.5±51.6mL vs. 91.7±113.5mL, P=0.007) and a reduced rate of composite outcome (23.8% vs. 56.7%, P=0.019), but incurred higher costs in the Warshaw group (¥56,227.4±¥7,027.0 vs. ¥63,513.8±¥12,944.5, P=0.013). Splenic infarction rates were higher in the Warshaw group, though not statistically significant (ITT: 39.3% vs. 12.5%, P=0.058; PP: 36.7% vs. 14.3%, P=0.113), without necessitating intervention. Neither group experienced postpancreatectomy haemorrhage, 90-day mortality, or ICU admissions, and all postoperative complications were mild (Clavien-Dindo Grade <III). The 90-day interim analysis postoperatively indicates that both Kimura and Warshaw techniques for LSPDP are safe and viable. The Kimura technique, however, confers superior in terms of reduced intraoperative blood loss and fewer complications, alongside lower costs.

Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic versus open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Meta-Analysis of randomized controlled trials and Propensity-Score-Matched studies.

Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is used more commonly, but this surge is mostly based on observational data. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the short-term outcomes between RPD and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) using data collected from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score-matched (PSM) studies. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases for RCTs and PSM studies comparing RPD and OPD. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Twenty-four studies, encompassing two RCTs and 22 PSM studies, were included, with a total of 9393 patients (RPD group: 3919 patients; OPD group: 5474 patients). Although RPD was associated with a longer operative time (MD, 61.61min), patients may benefit from reduced blood loss (MD, -154.05mL), shorter length of stay (MD, -1.60d), lower blood transfusion rate (RR, 0.85), and wound infection rate (RR, 0.61). There were no significant differences observed in 30-day readmission (RR, 0.99), 90-day mortality (RR, 0.97), overall morbidity (RR, 0.88), major complications (RR, 1.01), reoperation (RR, 1.08), bile leak (RR, 1.01), chylous leak (RR, 0.98), postoperative pancreatic fistula (RR, 0.97), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (RR, 1.15), delayed gastric emptying (RR, 0.88), number of harvested lymph nodes (MD, -0.12), and R0 resection (RR, 1.01) between the groups. Although some short-term outcomes were similar between RPD and OPD, RPD exhibited reduced intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stays, lower wound infection, and blood transfusion rates. In the future, RPD may become a safe and effective alternative to OPD.

Multivisceral Oncological Resections Involving the Pancreas: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

With the continuous advancement of cancer treatments, a comprehensive analysis of the impact of multivisceral oncological pancreatic resections on morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival is currently lacking. This manuscript presents the protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis designed to summarize the existing evidence concerning the outcomes of multivisceral oncological pancreatic resections across diverse tumor entities. We will conduct a systematic search of the PubMed or MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases in strict accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The predefined outcomes encompass postoperative mortality, postoperative morbidity, overall and disease-free survival (1- to 5-year survival rates), the proportion of macroscopically complete (R0) resections (according to the Royal College of Pathologists definition), duration of hospital stay (in days), reoperation rate (%), postoperative complications (covering all complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification), as well as pancreatic fistula, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, and delayed gastric emptying (all according to the definitions of the International Study Group of Pancreas Surgery). Systematic database searches will begin in July 2024. The completion of the meta-analysis is anticipated by December 2024. Before completion, the literature search will be checked for new publications that must be considered in the context of the work. The forthcoming findings will provide an up-to-date overview of the feasibility, safety, and oncological efficacy of multivisceral pancreatic resections across diverse tumor entities. This data will serve as a valuable resource for health care professionals and patients to make well-informed clinical decisions. PROSPERO CRD42023437858; https://tinyurl.com/bde5xmfw. PRR1-10.2196/54089.

Impact of preoperative chemotherapy on surgical results in 139 patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

The establishment of preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) with FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in recent years has enabled resectability in many patients with initially locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Nevertheless, information about the impact of PCT on surgical results is scarce. All patients with initial LAPC who received surgery after chemotherapy at the high-volume centre for pancreatic surgery of St. Josef-Hospital Bochum between 2015 and 2022 were included in this retrospective cohort analysis. A total of 139 patients underwent surgery after pre-treatment with FOLFIRINOX (76.3%), gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (11.5%), both (5.8%) and other regimens (6.5%). Eighty-five tumors (61.2%) were resectable after PCT. R0 resection was achieved in 92.9%, R1 in 7.1% and R2 in 0% of cases. Fifty-four tumors were still not resectable at the time of surgery. Surgical results of the patients did not show increased postoperative mortality and morbidity compared to the literature data. Postoperative 30-day mortality was 1.4%. Rates for pancreas-specific complications [postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), and others] were not increased. POPF occurred in 10.5% and DGE in 26.3% after pancreaticoduodenectomy. After distal pancreatectomy, POPF was detected in 37.5% and DGE in 12.5%. Median postoperative survival (31 vs. 13 months) and overall survival after initial diagnosis (40 vs. 20 months) were significantly longer in resected patients (P<0.001). Postoperative recurrence-free survival in resected patients amounted to 12 months. This study underlines that PCT allows resectability of primarily unresectable patients with LAPC without increasing perioperative mortality and morbidity. It may lead to a significant prolongation of recurrence-free and overall survival in resected patients after PCT.

Short‑ and long‑term outcomes after laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy for elderly patients: a propensity score‑matched study

BackgroundThe feasibility and safety of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) in elderly patients is still controversial. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of LPD and open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) in elderly patients.MethodsClinical and follow-up data of elderly patients (≥ 65 years) who underwent LPD or OPD between 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. A 1:1 propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis was performed to minimize differences between groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to select independent prognostic factors for 90-day mortality.ResultsOf the 410 elderly patients, 236 underwent LPD and 174 OPD. After PSM, the LPD group had a less estimated blood loss (EBL) (100 vs. 200 mL, P < 0.001), lower rates of intraoperative transfusion (10.4% vs. 19.0%, P = 0.029), more lymph node harvest (11.0 vs. 10.0, P = 0.014) and shorter postoperative length of stay (LOS) (13.0 vs. 16.0 days, P = 0.013). There were no significant differences in serious complications, reoperation, 90-day readmission and mortality rates (all P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) was an independent risk factor for 90-day mortality. Elderly patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who underwent LPD or OPD had similar overall survival (OS) (22.5 vs.20.4 months, P = 0.672) after PSM.ConclusionsIt is safe and feasible for elderly patients to undergo LPD with less EBL and a shorter postoperative LOS. There was no statistically significant difference in long-term survival outcomes between elderly PDAC patients who underwent LPD or OPD.