Postoperative Whole-brain Radiotherapy Research Articles

RADT-47. CLINICAL OUTCOMES AFTER SURGICAL RESECTION OF BRAIN METASTASES IN SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER PATIENTS

Abstract Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a high propensity to metastasize to the brain. Radiotherapy is the primary treatment for SCLC brain metastases. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been the standard of care, but recent studies show similar overall survival (OS) in patients treated with upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Surgery does not typically have a role in SCLC although it can provide relief of neurologic symptoms and pathologic diagnosis. We sought to determine the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent surgical resection of SCLC brain metastases. A retrospective chart review of SCLC patients treated at UPMC from 2010 – 2022 was performed. OS after resection was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test. 4,213 patients were diagnosed with SCLC, of which 715 patients (17%) had synchronous brain metastases at initial diagnosis. Forty patients underwent resection of SCLC brain metastases, all of whom were symptomatic. The median diameter of the resected brain metastases was 3.8 cm (range 1.7 – 8 cm). Seventy-five percent (n=30) had resection of synchronous brain metastases and 25% (n=10) had resection of metachronous brain metastases. Median OS for the surgical cohort was 13.6 months (interquartile range (IQR), 3.4 – 21.9 months). Patients with metachronous and synchronous brain metastases had median OS of 6.8 months (IQR, 2.8 – 24.6 months) and 14.3 months (IQR, 3.6 – 20.4), respectively. Of patients with synchronous brain metastases (n=30), 53% (n=16) received post-operative WBRT, 40% (n=11) received post-operative SRS and 10% (n=3) died within 7 weeks of surgery. Median OS of patients with synchronous brain metastases treated with WBRT and SRS were 11.9 months (IQR, 3.8 – 21.7) and 19.0 months (IQR, 14.6 – 30.3), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.53). Surgery for SCLC brain metastases is uncommon. Patients who received SRS versus WBRT post-operatively for synchronous brain metastases had no difference in OS.

Survival Impact of Postoperative Whole-brain Radiotherapy and Systemic Chemotherapy After Surgical Resection of Brain Metastases.

Resection of brain metastases is a well-established treatment modality that can prolong the survival of patients for whom surgery is indicated. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been the standard postoperative therapy. In recent years, however, clinicians have increasingly avoided WBRT due to its associated adverse events. This study investigated the impact of postoperative WBRT and systemic chemotherapy as prognostic factors on the survival of patients who had undergone resection of brain metastases. The study subjects were 172 patients who underwent surgical resection for brain metastases. Comparative analyses of survival after WBRT and systemic chemotherapy were performed. Postoperative WBRT had no survival-prolonging effect, whereas postoperative systemic chemotherapy prolonged survival. A comparison based on the number of systemic chemotherapy regimens administered prior to surgery showed that fewer regimens correlated with a better prognosis. The addition of WBRT after surgical resection of brain metastases is no longer a standard treatment strategy and systemic chemotherapy after surgery is a positive prognostic factor.

Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after resection of solitary brain metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveThe standard of care in patients with solitary brain metastasis involves surgical resection and postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). However, WBRT is associated with adverse effects, mainly neurocognitive deterioration. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a more targeted form of radiation therapy that could be as effective as WBRT without the detrimental neurocognitive decline. MethodsWe performed the first systematic review and meta-analysis comparing postoperative SRS versus postoperative WBRT in patients with one resected brain metastasis. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library were systematically searched for studies comparing the efficacy of the two radiation modalities in terms of local and distant brain control, leptomeningeal disease control, and overall survival. Additionally, we extracted patients’ neurocognitive function and quality of life after each postoperative radiation form. ResultsFour studies with 248 patients (128: WBRT, 120: SRS) were included in our analysis. There was no difference between SRS and WBRT in the risk of local recurrence (RR = 0.92, CI = 0.51–1.66, p = 0.78, I2 = 0%) and leptomeningeal disease (RR = 1.21, CI = 0.49–2.98, p = 0.67, I2 = 18%), neither in the patients’ overall survival (HR = 1.06, CI = 0.61–1.85, p = 0.83, I2 = 63%). Nevertheless, SRS appeared to increase the risk of distant brain failure (RR = 2.03, CI = 0.94–4.40, p = 0.07, I2 = 61%). Neurocognitive function and quality of life in the SRS group were equal or superior to the WBRT group. ConclusionsAlthough SRS may increase the risk of distant brain failure, it appears to be as effective as WBRT in terms of local control, risk of leptomeningeal disease, and overall survival while sparing the patients of the detrimental, WBRT-associated cognitive deterioration.

Association of Long-term Outcomes With Stereotactic Radiosurgery vs Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Resected Brain Metastasis

Long-term outcomes of radiotherapy are important in understanding the risks and benefits of therapies for patients with brain metastases. To determine how the use of postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is associated with quality of life (QOL), cognitive function, and intracranial tumor control in long-term survivors with 1 to 4 brain metastases. This secondary analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial included 48 institutions in the US and Canada. Adult patients with 1 resected brain metastases but limited to those with 1 to 4 brain metastasis were eligible. Unresected metastases were treated with SRS. Long-term survivors were defined as evaluable patients who lived longer than 1 year from randomization. Patients were recruited between July 2011 and December 2015, and data were first analyzed in February 2017. For the present study, intracranial tumor control, cognitive deterioration, QOL, and cognitive outcomes were measured in evaluable patients who were alive at 12 months from randomization and reanalyzed in June 2017. Stereotactic radiosurgery or WBRT. Intracranial tumor control, toxic effects, cognitive deterioration, and QOL. Fifty-four patients (27 SRS arm, 27 WBRT arm; female to male ratio, 65% vs 35%) were included for analysis with a median follow-up of 23.8 months. Cognitive deterioration was less frequent with SRS (37%-60%) compared with WBRT (75%-91%) at all time points. More patients declined by 2 or more standard deviations (SDs) in 1 or more cognitive tests for WBRT compared with SRS at 3, 6, and 9 months (70% vs 22%, 46% vs 19%, and 50% vs 20%, respectively). A 2 SD decline in at least 2 cognitive tests was associated with worse 12-month QOL in emotional well-being, functional well-being, general, additional concerns, and total scores. Overall QOL and functional independence favored SRS alone for categorical change at all time points. Total intracranial control for SRS alone vs WBRT at 12 months was 40.7% vs 81.5% (difference, -40.7; 95% CI, -68.1% to -13.4%), respectively. Data were first analyzed in February 2017. The use of SRS alone compared with WBRT resulted in less cognitive deterioration among long-term survivors. The association of late cognitive deterioration with WBRT was clinically meaningful. A significant decline in cognition (2 SD) was associated with overall QOL. However, intracranial tumor control was improved with WBRT. This study provides detailed insight into cognitive function over time in this patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01372774; ALLIANCE/CCTG: N107C/CEC.3 (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology/Canadian Cancer Trials Group).

Survival and prognostic factors in patients undergoing the resection of solitary brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Neurosurgery is the standard of care for resectable solitary brain metastasis (BM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but still with a poor outcome. Postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was reported to reduce local recurrence, whether it could prolong survival was uncertain. In this study, we attempted to evaluate WBRT and other prognostic for overall survival (OS) in these patients. In this retrospective study, NSCLC patients with a solitary BM and controlled primary tumor who underwent neurosurgical resection were selected from the medical records database between January 2014 and December 2018. Clinical data, disease control/progression results and survival outcomes were obtained from the medical records, regular outpatient follow-up and telephone interviews. Univariable and multivariable Cox analyses of potential prognostic factors including patients' characteristics, BM features, tissue-based parameters and postoperative treatments were conducted. OS was illustrated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and group differences were assessed using the log-rank test. The subgroup analysis compared each variable between the WBRT group and the untreated control by the hazard ratio and its 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 94 patients were included, with a median OS of 812 days. Univariable analysis showed that postoperative WBRT and targeted therapy were associated with OS. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that postoperative WBRT [P<0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 0.357], chemotherapy (P=0.008, HR 0.512), targeted therapy (P<0.001, HR 0.265), and smaller tumor size (P=0.018, HR 0.553) were independent prognostic factors for prolonged OS. However, tissue-based parameters (Ki67 tumor cell proliferation index, epidermal growth factor receptor, and checkpoint levels) were identified as statistically insignificant factors. In the subgroup analysis, the beneficial effect of WBRT was only observed in patients that did not receive systematic treatments. Postoperative WBRT and systematic treatments after solitary BM resection improve the prognosis of NSCLC patients with a controlled primary tumor. Postoperative WBRT could be considered, especially for those who not receive systematic chemotherapy or targeted therapy treatments, as they might be more likely to benefit from it.

P01.02.B Case Report: Disruption of Resting-State Networks and Cognitive Deficits After Whole Brain Irradiation for Singular Brain Metastasis

Abstract Background Long-term survivors of whole brain radiation (WBRT) are at significant risk for developing cognitive deficits, but knowledge about the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms is limited. Therefore, we here report a rare case with a singular brain metastasis treated by resection and WBRT that survived for more than 10 years where we investigated the integrity of brain networks using resting-state functional MRI. Material and Methods A female patient with a left frontal non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastasis had resection and postoperative WBRT (30.0 in 3.0Gy fractions) and stayed free from brain metastasis recurrence for a follow-up period of 11 years. Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and amino acid [O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine] positron emission tomography (FET PET) were repeatedly acquired. At the last follow up, neurocognitive functions and resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) using resting-state fMRI were assessed. Within-network and inter-network connectivity of seven resting-state networks were computed from a connectivity matrix. All measures were compared to a matched group of 10 female healthy subjects. Results At the 11-year follow-up, T2/FLAIR MR images of the patient showed extended regions of hyper-intensities covering mainly the white matter of the bilateral dorsal frontal and parietal lobes while sparing most of the temporal lobes. Compared to the healthy subjects, the patient performed significantly worse in all cognitive domains that included executive functions, attention and processing speed, while verbal working memory, verbal episodic memory, and visual working memory were left mostly unaffected. The connectivity matrix showed a heavily disturbed pattern with a widely distributed, scattered loss of RSFC. The within-network RSFC revealed a significant loss of connectivity within all seven networks where the dorsal attention and fronto-parietal control networks were affected most severely. The inter-network RSFC was significantly reduced for the visual, somato-motor, and dorsal and ventral attention networks. Conclusion As demonstrated here in a patient with a metastatic NSCLC and long-term survival, WBRT may lead to extended white matter damage and cause severe disruption of the RSFC in multiple resting state networks. In consequence, executive functioning which is assumed to depend on the interaction of several networks may be severely impaired following WBRT apart from the well-recognized deficits in memory function.

Multi-institutional Analysis of Prognostic Factors and Outcomes After Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy to the Resection Cavity in Patients With Brain Metastases

For brain metastases, the combination of neurosurgical resection and postoperative hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) is an emerging therapeutic approach preferred to the prior practice of postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy. However, mature large-scale outcome data are lacking. To evaluate outcomes and prognostic factors after HSRT to the resection cavity in patients with brain metastases. An international, multi-institutional cohort study was performed in 558 patients with resected brain metastases and postoperative HSRT treated between December 1, 2003, and October 31, 2019, in 1 of 6 participating centers. Exclusion criteria were prior cranial radiotherapy (including whole-brain radiotherapy) and early termination of treatment. A median total dose of 30 Gy (range, 18-35 Gy) and a dose per fraction of 6 Gy (range, 5-10.7 Gy) were applied. The primary end points were overall survival, local control (LC), and the analysis of prognostic factors associated with overall survival and LC. Secondary end points included distant intracranial failure, distant progression, and the incidence of neurologic toxicity. A total of 558 patients (mean [SD] age, 61 [0.50] years; 301 [53.9%] female) with 581 resected cavities were analyzed. The median follow-up was 12.3 months (interquartile range, 5.0-25.3 months). Overall survival was 65% at 1 year, 46% at 2 years, and 33% at 3 years, whereas LC was 84% at 1 year, 75% at 2 years, and 71% at 3 years. Radiation necrosis was present in 48 patients (8.6%) and leptomeningeal disease in 73 patients (13.1%). Neurologic toxic events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or higher occurred in 16 patients (2.8%) less than 6 months and 24 patients (4.1%) greater than 6 months after treatment. Multivariate analysis identified a Karnofsky Performance Status score of 80% or greater (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46-0.82; P < .001), 22 to 33 days between resection and radiotherapy (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.07-2.10; P = .02), and a controlled primary tumor (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.90; P = .007) as prognostic factors associated with overall survival. For LC, a single brain metastasis (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35-0.93; P = .03) and a controlled primary tumor (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.92; P = .02) were significant in the multivariate analysis. To date, this cohort study includes one of the largest series of patients with brain metastases and postoperative HSRT and appears to confirm an excellent risk-benefit profile of local HSRT to the resection cavity. Additional studies will help determine radiation dose-volume parameters and provide a better understanding of synergistic effects with systemic and immunotherapies.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery After Resection of Brain Metastases: Changing Patterns of Care in the United States

Management of symptomatic brain metastases often includes surgical resection with postoperative radiotherapy. Postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) improves intracranial control but detrimentally impacts quality of life and neurocognition. We sought to characterize the use in the United States of postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), an evolving standard-of-care associated with reduced cognitive effects. With the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database from 2007 to 2015, we identified patients aged 18-65 years treated with resection of a brain metastasis followed by SRS or WBRT within 60 days of surgery. Logistic regression estimated associations between co-variables (treatment year, age, sex, geographic region, place of service, insurance type, disease histology, comorbidity score, and median area household income and educational attainment) and SRS receipt. Of 4007 patients included, 1506 (37.6%) received SRS and 2501 (62.4%) received WBRT. Postoperative SRS increased from 16.5% (2007-2008) to 56.8% (2014-2015). Patients residing in areas with a median household income or an educational attainment below 50th percentile were significantly less likely to receive SRS after controlling for treatment year and other demographic characteristics (P < 0.01). Factors associated with greater odds of receiving SRS included younger age, female sex, melanoma histology, Western region location, hospital-based facility, and high-deductible health plan enrollment (P < 0.05 for each). Postoperative SRS for brain metastases has increased from 2007 to 2015, with the majority of patients now receiving SRS over WBRT. Patients in areas of lower socioeconomic class were less likely to receive SRS, warranting further investigation of barriers to SRS adoption.

Outcomes of adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy versus hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy after surgical resection of brain metastases: a propensity score-matched analysis.

To assess the risks of local and distant failure and overall survival time in patients treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) to the postoperative cavity for brain metastases (BMs) compared with patients treated with adjuvant whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Between July 2005 and February 2015, 196 non-randomized patients with 202 resected BMs were treated with post-operative WBRT or HFSRT at a single institution. The propensity score was included as a covariate to compare the interval to local failure, distant brain failure and overall survival time. The matching covariates consisted of the age, Karnofsky performance status, primary disease, number of BMs, extracranial disease status and presence or absence of extracranial metastases. In total, 110 patients (54.5%) received adjuvant WBRT, and 92 HFSRT procedures (45.5%) were delivered after surgery. A Cox model adjusted on the propensity score showed that the brain distant failure was significantly associated with treatment modality. Compared with WBRT, the patients who received HFSRT had a significantly greater risk of developing distant brain recurrence [HR =3.37 (2.13-5.33), P<0.001]. No difference was observed in local failure (HR =1.16, P=0.77) between the groups. In the propensity-matched cohort, the effect of treatment on survival was not significant (P=0.14), but it depended on the time. Within the first 20 months, the patients treated with WBRT had a 2 times higher risk of death than did patients treated with HFSRT [HR =2.17 (1.42-3.32), P=0.0003]. Compared with the standard WBRT after the resection of BMs, stereotactic radiotherapy to the surgical bed produced a comparable local control rate to that of WBRT with a survival advantage in the first 20 months.

Erratum to: Evaluation of Stereotactic Radiotherapy of the Resection Cavity After Surgery of Brain Metastases Compared to Postoperative Whole-Brain Radiotherapy (ESTRON)-A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Trial.

Erratum to: Evaluation of Stereotactic Radiotherapy of the Resection Cavity After Surgery of Brain Metastases Compared to Postoperative Whole-Brain Radiotherapy (ESTRON)-A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Trial.

Mechanisms and Therapy for Cancer Metastasis to the Brain.

Advances in chemotherapy and targeted therapies have improved survival in cancer patients with an increase of the incidence of newly diagnosed brain metastases (BMs). Intracranial metastases are symptomatic in 60–70% of patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium is more sensitive than computed tomography and advanced neuroimaging techniques have been increasingly used in the detection, treatment planning, and follow-up of BM. Apart from the morphological analysis, the most effective tool for characterizing BM is immunohistochemistry. Molecular alterations not always reflect those of the primary tumor. More sophisticated methods of tumor analysis detecting circulating biomarkers in fluids (liquid biopsy), including circulating DNA, circulating tumor cells, and extracellular vesicles, containing tumor DNA and macromolecules (microRNA), have shown promise regarding tumor treatment response and progression. The choice of therapeutic approaches is guided by prognostic scores (Recursive Partitioning Analysis and diagnostic-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment-DS-GPA). The survival benefit of surgical resection seems limited to the subgroup of patients with controlled systemic disease and good performance status. Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) can be a complication, especially in posterior fossa metastases undergoing a “piecemeal” resection. Radiosurgery of the resection cavity may offer comparable survival and local control as postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). WBRT alone is now the treatment of choice only for patients with single or multiple BMs not amenable to surgery or radiosurgery, or with poor prognostic factors. To reduce the neurocognitive sequelae of WBRT intensity modulated radiotherapy with hippocampal sparing, and pharmacological approaches (memantine and donepezil) have been investigated. In the last decade, a multitude of molecular abnormalities have been discovered. Approximately 33% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors and epidermal growth factor receptor mutations develop BMs, which are targetable with different generations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs: gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, icotinib, and osimertinib). Other “druggable” alterations seen in up to 5% of NSCLC patients are the rearrangements of the “anaplastic lymphoma kinase” gene TKI (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib). In human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, breast cancer targeted therapies have been widely used (trastuzumab, trastuzumab-emtansine, lapatinib-capecitabine, and neratinib). Novel targeted and immunotherapeutic agents have also revolutionized the systemic management of melanoma (ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and BRAF inhibitors dabrafenib and vemurafenib).

Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery compared with whole brain radiotherapy for resected metastatic brain disease (NCCTG N107C/CEC·3): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is the standard of care to improve intracranial control following resection of brain metastasis. However, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the surgical cavity is widely used in an attempt to reduce cognitive toxicity, despite the absence of high-level comparative data substantiating efficacy in the postoperative setting. We aimed to establish the effect of SRS on survival and cognitive outcomes compared with WBRT in patients with resected brain metastasis. In this randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, adult patients (aged 18 years or older) from 48 institutions in the USA and Canada with one resected brain metastasis and a resection cavity less than 5·0 cm in maximal extent were randomly assigned (1:1) to either postoperative SRS (12-20 Gy single fraction with dose determined by surgical cavity volume) or WBRT (30 Gy in ten daily fractions or 37·5 Gy in 15 daily fractions of 2·5 Gy; fractionation schedule predetermined for all patients at treating centre). We randomised patients using a dynamic allocation strategy with stratification factors of age, duration of extracranial disease control, number of brain metastases, histology, maximal resection cavity diameter, and treatment centre. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The co-primary endpoints were cognitive-deterioration-free survival and overall survival, and analyses were done by intention to treat. We report the final analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01372774. Between Nov 10, 2011, and Nov 16, 2015, 194 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to SRS (98 patients) or WBRT (96 patients). Median follow-up was 11·1 months (IQR 5·1-18·0). Cognitive-deterioration-free survival was longer in patients assigned to SRS (median 3·7 months [95% CI 3·45-5·06], 93 events) than in patients assigned to WBRT (median 3·0 months [2·86-3·25], 93 events; hazard ratio [HR] 0·47 [95% CI 0·35-0·63]; p<0·0001), and cognitive deterioration at 6 months was less frequent in patients who received SRS than those who received WBRT (28 [52%] of 54 evaluable patients assigned to SRS vs 41 [85%] of 48 evaluable patients assigned to WBRT; difference -33·6% [95% CI -45·3 to -21·8], p<0·00031). Median overall survival was 12·2 months (95% CI 9·7-16·0, 69 deaths) for SRS and 11·6 months (9·9-18·0, 67 deaths) for WBRT (HR 1·07 [95% CI 0·76-1·50]; p=0·70). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events reported with a relative frequency greater than 4% were hearing impairment (three [3%] of 93 patients in the SRS group vs eight [9%] of 92 patients in the WBRT group) and cognitive disturbance (three [3%] vs five [5%]). There were no treatment-related deaths. Decline in cognitive function was more frequent with WBRT than with SRS and there was no difference in overall survival between the treatment groups. After resection of a brain metastasis, SRS radiosurgery should be considered one of the standards of care as a less toxic alternative to WBRT for this patient population. National Cancer Institute.

Outcomes of surgery followed by local brain radiotherapy compared with surgery followed by whole brain radiotherapy for single brain metastasis.

To determine the clinical efficacy of surgery followed by local brain radiotherapy (LBRT) for patients with a single brain metastasis, by comparing the results with those of postoperative whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). We performed a retrospective analysis to compare the survival rate, recurrence-free rates, and causes of death for single brain metastasis patients who underwent surgery followed by LBRT or WBRT in the 2010-2015 period. After their surgery, 22 and 32 patients were treated by LBRT and WBRT, respectively. The median survival times for these LBRT and WBRT groups were 18.3 months and 19.2 months, respectively (p = 0.356). The local recurrence-free rates were 81.2% at 1 year and 81.2% at 2 years after LBRT, and 63.8% at 1 year and 58.9% at 2 years after WBRT (p = 0.589). The distant brain recurrence-free rates were 42.5% at 1 year and 25.5% at 2 years after LBRT, and 69.8% at 1 year and 52.4% at 2 years after WBRT (p = 0.044). Distant brain recurrences were observed significantly more frequently in the LBRT group, but the rates of salvage treatment application and survival were not significantly different between the LBRT and WBRT groups. The probability of neurologic death was not significantly higher in the LBRT group compared with the WBRT group. Surgery followed by LBRT for single brain metastasis is not inferior to postoperative WBRT, because survival and the necessity of salvage treatment after LBRT were equivalent to those after WBRT.

Brain Metastases of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Prognostic Factors in Patients with Surgical Resection.

Bronchogenic carcinoma is the cancer that most commonly metastasizes to the brain. The standard treatment schedule for these patients is still unclear, although recommendation level 1 class I advocates for surgical resection together with postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy for patients with good Karnofsky performance status (KPS). We performed a study to identify prognostic factors for the long-term survival of patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This retrospective single-center study included 71 patients with brain metastases from NSCLC having undergone surgical metastasectomy between January 2002 and January 2015. The average age was 58.8 years. A total of 85.9% of the lesions were located in the supratentorial region, 61.9% of the lesions were < 3 cm, and 80.3% of cases were solitary brain metastases. Complete resection was achieved in 90.1% of patients. Clinical debut with motor involvement was associated with higher rates of incomplete surgical resection. Patients with motor deficits had a worse preoperative KPS. The preoperative KPS was > 70 in 74.6% of patients, and the postoperative KPS was > 70 in 85.9% of patients. Overall, 84.5% of the brain surgeries had no complications. Brain metastases were diagnosed as a synchronous presentation in 64.7% of patients.The average survival after brain surgery was 20.38 months. The survival rate was 66.2% at 6 months, 45.1% at 12 months, 22.5% at 24 months, 14.1% at 36 months, and 8.5% at 48 months. Patients < 55 years of age showed a higher survival rate at 12 months and 48 months. Patients > 70 years of age showed a higher mortality rate at 6 months. Complete surgical brain metastasis resection was associated with an increased survival at 6 months, and patients undergoing primary lung surgery had better survival rates at 48 months. A preoperative KPS > 70% improved the prognosis of patients at 6 and 24 months. Surgical complications reduced survival at 6 and 12 months. Surgical resection may be beneficial for a given group of patients: a preoperative KPS > 70; age < 55 years, complete surgical brain metastasis resection, no surgical complications, patients with primary lung surgery, and complete radiotherapy treatment. We did not find any significant difference regarding further factors that probably affect survival rates such as size or number of metastases.

Correlation of Tumor and Peritumoral Edema Volumes with Survival in Patients with Cerebral Metastases.

Surgical resection in combination with radiotherapy in selected cases remains the best option for patients with cerebral metastases. Postoperative relapse of brain metastases occurs frequently and can be reduced by postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Continuous spread of tumor cells from the primary lesions is debated as a cause of recurrence. It is well known that in gliomas, infiltration takes place within the surrounding edema. Obviously, most brain metastases are usually associated with peritumoral edema, which may act as an indicator of infiltration and more aggressive tumor biology. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the correlation of tumor and edema volumes with overall survival in patients with cerebral metastases. A total of 143 patients diagnosed with brain metastasis (male:female=1.1:1) who underwent surgical resection were included retrospectively in this analysis. Clinical data were retrieved from electronic patient files. The volumes of tumor and edema calculated by manual delineation. The ratio of edema to tumor volume was calculated, leading to dichotomization of the patients. The median tumor volume was 20.1 cc (range=0.8-90.8 cc) and the median volume of edema 49.5 cc (range=0-179.9 cc). The volume of metastases did not significantly correlate with overall survival. The ratio of edema to tumor volume was also not a prognostic factor in terms of overall survival. Only surgical resection, preoperative recursive partitioning analysis class, and postoperative addition of WBRT, as well as female sex, demonstrated beneficial effects. The extent of edema surrounding cerebral metastases does not appear to influence overall survival in patients suffering from brain metastases, although it seems to be responsible for most of the patients' symptoms. The hypothesis that the extent of edema was disadvantageous concerning survival was supported by our data.

Effects of Postoperative Radiotherapy on Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis or Dural Metastasis after Resection of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients.

PurposeIn this retrospective study, we compared the incidence of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis or dural metastasis (LMCDM) in patients who received whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), partial radiotherapy (PRT), or no radiotherapy (RT) following resection of brain metastases from breast cancer.Materials and MethodsFifty-one patients with breast cancer underwent surgical resection for newly diagnosed brain metastases in two institutions between March 2001 and March 2015. Among these, 34 received postoperative WBRT (n=24) or PRT (n=10) and 17 did not.ResultsWith a median follow-up of 12.4 months (range, 2.3 to 83.6 months), 22/51 patients developed LMCDM at a median of 8.6 months (range, 4.8 to 51.2 months) after surgery. The 18-months LMCDM-free survival (LMCDM-FS) rates were 77.5%, 30.0%, and 13.6%, in the WBRT, PRT, and no RT groups, respectively (p=0.013). The presence of a tumor adjacent to cerebrospinal fluid flow and no systemic treatment after treatment for brain metastases were also associated with poor LMCDM-FS rate. Multivariate analysis showed that WBRT compared to PRT (p=0.009) and systemic treatment (p < 0.001) were independently associated with reduced incidence of LMCDM.ConclusionWBRT improved LMCDM-FS rate after resection of brain metastases compared to PRT in breast cancer patients.

Population-based Analysis of Treatment and Survival in Women Presenting With Brain Metastasis at Initial Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Brain metastasis at initial breast cancer diagnosis is rare. This study aims to evaluate the clinical characteristics of these patients and identify prognostic and treatment factors associated with improved survival. Subjects were 35 women referred from 1996 to 2005 with newly diagnosed breast cancer with synchronous brain metastasis. Overall survival (OS) and brain progression-free survival were examined using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between subgroups with different clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics using log-rank tests. Median age was 65 years. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone was used in 25 patients, surgical resection and postoperative WBRT in 5 patients, and no or unknown treatment in 5 patients. Patients who underwent cranial resection were more likely to have solitary brain metastasis (P=0.003) and no visceral involvement (P=0.006). Overall, median OS was 6.8 months and median brain progression-free survival was 6.5 months (range, 0.7 to 54 mo). Median OS were 15 months with surgery and postoperative WBRT, 5 months with WBRT alone, and 3 months with no brain treatment. Longer OS was observed with age below 65 years versus 65 years and above (11 vs. 5 mo, P=0.046), 0 to 1 versus ≥2 sites of extracranial metastasis (10 vs. 3 mo, P=0.047), and diagnosis from 2001 to 2005 versus 1996 to 2000 (10 vs. 3 mo, P=0.018). A trend toward improved OS was observed in patients with no visceral involvement (11 vs. 4 mo, P=0.09). In this unique cohort presenting with breast cancer and synchronous brain metastasis, longer survival were observed with young age, limited extracranial metastasis, and no visceral disease. These characteristics may be used to select candidates for more aggressive treatment.

Metastasis-inducing proteins are widely expressed in human brain metastases and associated with intracranial progression and radiation response.

Background:Understanding the factors that drive recurrence and radiosensitivity in brain metastases would improve prediction of outcomes, treatment planning and development of therapeutics. We investigated the expression of known metastasis-inducing proteins in human brain metastases.Methods:Immunohistochemistry on metastases removed at neurosurgery from 138 patients to determine the degree and pattern of expression of the proteins S100A4, S100P, AGR2, osteopontin (OPN) and the DNA repair marker FANCD2. Validation of significant findings in a separate prospective series with the investigation of intra-tumoral heterogeneity using image-guided sampling. Assessment of S100A4 expression in brain metastatic and non-metastatic primary breast carcinomas.Results:There was widespread staining for OPN, S100A4, S100P and AGR2 in human brain metastases. Positive staining for S100A4 was independently associated with a shorter time to intracranial progression after resection in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio for negative over positive staining=0.17, 95% CI: 0.04–0.74, P=0.018). S100A4 was expressed at the leading edge of brain metastases in image guided sampling and overexpressed in brain metastatic vs non-brain metastatic primary breast carcinomas. Staining for OPN was associated with a significant increase in survival time after post-operative whole-brain radiotherapy in retrospective (OPN negative 3.43 months, 95% CI: 1.36–5.51 vs OPN positive, 11.20 months 95% CI: 7.68–14.72, Log rank test, P<0.001) and validation populations.Conclusions:Proteins known to be involved in cellular adhesion and migration in vitro, and metastasis in vivo are significantly expressed in human brain metastases and may be useful biomarkers of intracranial progression and radiosensitivity.

Treatment of Brain Metastases.

Brain metastases (BMs) occur in 10% to 20% of adult patients with cancer, and with increased surveillance and improved systemic control, the incidence is likely to grow. Despite multimodal treatment, prognosis remains poor. Current evidence supports use of whole-brain radiation therapy when patients present with multiple BMs. However, its associated cognitive impairment is a major deterrent in patients likely to live longer than 6 months. In patients with oligometastases (one to three metastases) and even some with multiple lesions less than 3 to 4 cm, especially if the primary tumor is considered radiotherapy resistant, stereotactic radiosurgery is recommended; if the BMs are greater than 4 cm, surgical resection with or without postoperative whole-brain radiation therapy should be considered. There is increasing evidence that systemic therapy, including targeted therapy and immunotherapy, is effective against BM and may be an early choice, especially in patients with sensitive primary tumors. In patients with progressive systemic disease, limited treatment options, and poor performance status, best supportive care may be appropriate. Regardless of treatment goals, use of corticosteroids or antiepileptic medications is helpful in symptomatic patients. In this review, we provide a summary of current therapy, as well as developments in the treatment of BM from solid tumors.

Neurosurgical treatment of brain tumors in the first 6months of life: long-term follow-up of a single consecutive institutional series of 30 patients.

ObjectThe aim of this study is to delineate the long-term results for patients going through surgery for pediatric brain tumors in the first 6 months of life.MethodsThirty consecutive children (1–182 days old) who underwent primary resection for a brain tumor during the years 1973–2012 were included in this retrospective study on surgical morbidity, mortality rate, academic achievement, and/or work participation. Gross motor function and activities of daily life were scored according to the Barthel index.ResultsOf the 30 patients, 11 children had surgery in the first 3 months of life (1 to 88 days) and 19 were aged 3 to 6 months (94–182 days) at the time of surgery. The male/female ratio was 1.0 (15/15). No patients were lost to follow-up. Two patients died in the postoperative period (30 days). Another eight patients died during the follow-up. Twenty patients are alive, with follow-up times from 2 to 38 years, median 13 years. Among the 28 children who survived the primary resection, eight underwent repeat surgery from 6 months to 5 years after the first operation. Two children were operated three times, and one of these also a fourth time. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 20 of the primary resections, subtotal resection (STR) in 6, and in the last 4, only a biopsy or a partial resection was performed.Nine children received adjuvant chemotherapy and three of these also radiotherapy (in the years 1979–1987). Among the 20 survivors, the Barthel index is normal (100) in 18 patients, 40 in one, and 20 in the last one. Eight tumors were located to the posterior fossa, and 22 were supratentorial. Eighteen tumors were histologically low-grade (WHO grade I–II), most of these were plexus papillomas (7) or astrocytomas (7), and 12 were high-grade (WHO grade III–IV); PNET/medulloblastomas (6), ependymoma (2), glioblastoma (2), teratoma, and plexus carcinoma.ConclusionInfants with brain tumors may clearly benefit from surgical resection with favorable results even for prolonged periods of time. Ten children died, two of them with prolonged survival for 9 and 29 years. Among the 20 survivors, a stable very long-term result appears obtainable in 18 also when it comes to quality of life. Four of the survivors have been treated for highly malignant tumors with a follow-up of 5, 11, 14, and 26 years. One of our infant patients treated for GBM in 1982, lived for 29 years, however, with a progressive decline in the quality of life probably due to postoperative whole-brain radiation.