Postoperative Recovery Programs Research Articles

ANALYSIS OF CAUSES AND POSTOPERATIVE RECOVERY OF ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT INJURY CAUSED BY AEROBICS IN KNEE JOINTS

Background: During the process of aerobic exercise, there are a lot of jumping and split movements, which can easily cause anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in the knee joint. After undergoing ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery, postoperative recovery is crucial. Currently, many methods have been applied, but research on water exercise is still limited. Purpose: This paper aims to understand the role of water exercise in the recovery of athletic ability after ACLR and provide guidance for athletes’ postoperative rehabilitation. Methods: Forty athletes with ACL injuries caused by aerobics practice or competition and undergoing surgery were randomly assigned to either group A or group B. The former received six weeks of a conventional postoperative recovery program, and the latter received six weeks of a water exercise postoperative recovery program. Knee joint range of motion (ROM), swelling value, visual analog scale (VAS) score, knee joint function score, and passive angle reproduction (PAR) were measured before and after the experiment. Results: After six weeks of recovery, the knee ROM was [Formula: see text], the swelling value was [Formula: see text][Formula: see text]cm, the VAS score was [Formula: see text], the Lysholm score was [Formula: see text], and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was [Formula: see text] in group B, which were significantly lower than those before recovery and those in group A ([Formula: see text]). After recovery, the PAR of the affected side was still different from that of the healthy side in the two groups ([Formula: see text]), but the PAR of group B was better than that of group A ([Formula: see text]). Conclusion: Compared to the conventional program, the water exercise-based postoperative recovery program demonstrates better performance in improving knee joint ROM, functionality, and proprioception, and can be used for practical post-ACLR rehabilitation.

Standardized Postoperative Recovery Reduces in-Hospital Stay After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

<i>Background</i>: This study aims to examine if a standardized enhanced recovery program (ERP) could reduce the length of stay (LOS) after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIO) compared to the earlier applied recovery program without increasing the risk of postoperative complications and readmissions. <i>Methods</i>: Retrospective study of patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer who have had an uncomplicated postoperative stay following MIO. Patients had followed two different postoperative recovery programs according to their year of surgery (2016 versus 2018). <i>Results</i>: 48 patients in 2016 and 42 patients in 2018 were included. Patients were comparable on demographic factors. The median LOS was reduced from 9 days in 2016 to 8 days in 2018 (p<0.001). In 2018, 27 patients (64.3%) fulfilled the aim of discharge to their own home on day 8 after surgery. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the two groups in the risk of complications (Clavien-Dindo degree 0-2). Two patients in 2016 (4.2%) and two patients in 2018 (4.8%) were readmitted within 7 days after discharge (not significant). There was no in-hospital mortality or 30-day mortality in either of the two groups. <i>Conclusion</i>: The introduction of an ERP at our institution reduced the median postoperative stay after MIO by one day without increasing the risk of complications and readmittance. Further reduction might be obtained if oral feeding is allowed earlier.

Ambulatory Extended Recovery: Coming to an Operating Theater Near You

Ambulatory Extended Recovery: Coming to an Operating Theater Near You

Postoperative Care Pathways Following Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: Results of a Modified Delphi Approach.

A modified Delphi method was used to establish consensus. Subject matter experts were invited to participate as the expert panel. Best practice statements were distributed to the panel. Panel members were asked to mark "agree" or "disagree" after a series of statements during several rounds until either consensus could be obtained or the practice method was deemed unable to achieve consensus. Lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) is acknowledged as an alternative to spinal fusion in appropriately selected patients. There is a lack of unanimity on the appropriate postoperative patient protocols and rehabilitation expectations for the procedure. The long-term viability of Lumbar TDR, further adoption in the community setting and specific patient outcomes are contingent on the existence of appropriate postoperative recovery programs. Currently there are no established methods for postoperative care following lumbar TDR. Establishing a postoperative clinical pathway algorithm may improve patient outcomes with respect to lumbar TDR. A lumbar TDR expert panel of 22 spine surgeons employed a modified Delphi method to drive consensus on postoperative care following single-level Lumbar TDR. The panel first reviewed literature and guidelines relevant to postoperative care following lumbar TDR. Panel members considered 21 survey questions intended to determine "standard-practice" postoperative care recommendations for patients who have undergone lumbar TDR for the initial recovery phase (0-4 wk) and rehabilitation (4-20 wk). Each panel member participated in a round of anonymous voting followed by a group discussion. Consensus was defined as 80% agreement or higher among the respondents. Consensus was achieved in 11 of the 21 survey questions. There was a high degree of consensus around the key goals for both the initial recovery and rehabilitation phases, ceased use of narcotics for pain management by 4 weeks postoperative, unrestricted walking immediately following surgery, timelines for physical therapy (within 2-4 wk) and return to work based on level of activity (as early as 1 wk postoperative). Lack of agreement included the use of back bracing and timing of postoperative visits. Generally, panel members felt that patient expectations regarding return to function were different following lumbar TDR versus fusion and warrant further study. Surgeon and patient alignment around postoperative expectations may significantly affect the long-term results of lumbar TDR. This surgeon consensus study found agreement for immediate postoperative ambulation, rapid reduction in opioids within the first month, and early return to work. When expectations are appropriately set with patients preoperatively, both provider and patient have shared goals in the return-to-function process. 5.

Aspects of Cementation in Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty after Complex Fracture of the Proximal Humerus

The first uses of the polymers at the articular level were: joint components, cement fixation of prosthetic components at the bone, and sutures of tendons and ligaments. Since 1970, when polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) was introduced, bone cement is the choice of choice to fix the prosthetic implant to bone. The cementation of the implant components is a commonly used procedure for hip, knee and shoulder arthroplasty: the femoral stem and the acetabular cup (in the case of total hip arthroplasty), the femoral and tibial components (in the case of total knee arthroplasty), the humeral stem (in hemiarthroplasty, total arthroplasty: anatomical or arthroplasty with inverse shoulder prosthesis) The objectives of this study are to establish the optimal indication of the cementing process, to evaluate and compare the results of cemented hemiarthroplasty, the real benefit from the immediate postoperative functional recovery program, for elderly patients with a diminished bone stock with complex fractures of proximal humerus. The success of the surgical treatment for complex fractures of proximal humerus depends to a large extent on establishing a correct diagnosis, an optimal surgical indication, a thorough preoperative planning, an optimal implant, a periarticular soft tissue reconstruction, and an effective postoperative recovery program.

Short-term quality of life in patients undergoing colonic surgery using enhanced recovery after surgery program versus conventional perioperative management.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) integrates evidence-based interventions to reduce surgical stress and accelerate rehabilitation. Our study was to compare the short-term quality of life (QOL) in patients undergoing open colonic surgery using ERAS program or conventional management. A prospective study of 57 patients using ERAS program and 60 patients using conventional management was conducted. The clinical characteristics of all patients were recorded. QOL was evaluated longitudinally using the questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29) pre- and postoperatively. Generalized estimating equation was used to do the analysis in order to determine the effective impact of correlative factors on the postoperative QOL, including age, sex, BMI, ASA grade, tumor location, tumor size, pTNM stage, recovery program and length of time after surgery. The morbidity in ERAS and control group was 17.5 versus 26.7 % (p = 0.235). The patients in ERAS group had much faster rehabilitation and less hospital stay. In the primary statistical analysis, the scores of global QOL (on POD3, POD6, POD10, POD14, POD21), physical functioning (on POD3, POD6, POD10, POD14, POD21), role functioning (on POD6, POD10, POD14, POD21), emotional functioning (on POD3, POD6, POD10, POD14, POD21), cognitive functioning (on POD3, POD6) and social functioning (on POD3, POD6, POD10, POD14, POD21, POD28) were higher in ERAS group than in control group, which suggested that the patients in ERAS group had a better life status. However, the scores of pain (on POD10, POD14, POD21), appetite loss (on POD3, POD6), constipation (on POD3, POD6, POD10), diarrhea (on POD3, POD10), financial difficulties (on POD10, POD14, POD21), perspective of future health (on POD6, POD10, POD14), gastrointestinal tract problems (on POD3, POD6, POD10) and defecation problems (on POD6, POD10, POD14) were lower in ERAS group than in control group, which revealed that the patients in ERAS group suffered less symptoms. In the further generalized estimating equation analysis, the result showed that recovery program and length of time after surgery had independently positive impact on the patient's postoperative QOL. Short-term QOL in patients undergoing colonic cancer using ERAS program was better than that using conventional management.

Delirium in fast-track colonic surgery.

Postoperative delirium (PD) is a common but serious problem after major surgery with a multifactorial pathogenesis including age, pain, opioid use, sleep disturbances and the surgical stress response. These factors have been minimised by the "fast-track methodology" previously demonstrated to enhance recovery and reduce morbidity. Clinical symptoms of PD were routinely collected three times daily from preoperatively until discharge in a well-defined enhanced recovery program after colonic surgery in 247 consecutive patients. Total median length of hospital stay was 3 days. Seven patients (2.8%) developed clinical signs of PD most within the first 72 postoperative hours and only 1 patient with PD extending to 120 h postoperatively. Only 1 PD patient required treatment with serenase. PD patients were older (83 vs. 73 years) and had longer median stay (6 vs. 3 days). No difference in development of PD between open and laparoscopic operation could be demonstrated. Among the 7 patients with PD, 3 of these patients had later surgical complications. One patient had a subsequent strangulated small intestine, another an anastomotic leakage complicated by a bleeding gastric ulcer and death on day 12 and 1 with fever, abdominal pain and suspected but disproven anastomotic leakage (stay 21, 12 and 22 days, respectively). The remaining 4 PD patients stayed 4, 4, 5 and 6 days with an uncomplicated course. These data support that an enhanced postoperative recovery program may decrease the risk and duration of PD after colonic surgery.

Enhanced Recovery Protocol after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols aim to improve patient care and decrease complications and hospital stay. We evaluated our enhanced recovery after surgery protocol, focusing on length of stay, early complication and readmission rates after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. From May 2012 to July 2013 a perioperative protocol was applied in 126 consecutive patients who underwent open radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. Nonconsenting patients (2), those with previous diversion (2) and prolonged postoperative intubation (3), and those who underwent additional surgery (9) were excluded from study. The protocol focuses on avoiding bowel preparation and nasogastric tube, early feeding, nonnarcotic pain management and the use of cholinergic and μ-opioid antagonists. Outcomes were compared to those in matched controls from our bladder cancer database. A total of 110 patients with a median age of 69 years were included in analysis, of whom 68% underwent continent urinary diversion. Of the patients 82% had a bowel movement by postoperative day 2. Median length of stay was 4 days. The 30-day minor and major complication rates were 64% and 14%, respectively. The most common minor complication was anemia requiring transfusion in 19% of patients, urinary tract infection in 13% and dehydration in 10%. The latter 2 complications were the most common etiologies for readmission. The 30-day readmission rate was 21% (23 patients). Patients 75 years old or older had a longer length of stay (5 vs 4 days, p = 0.03) and a higher minor complication rate (72% vs 51%, p = 0.04) than younger patients. Our enhanced recovery after surgery protocol expedites bowel function recovery and shortens hospital stay after RC and urinary diversion without an increase in the hospital readmission rates.

An evaluation of embolisation in the management of haemorrhage from traumatic solid organ injury at a level 1 major trauma centre

An evaluation of embolisation in the management of haemorrhage from traumatic solid organ injury at a level 1 major trauma centre

A prospective study of early removal of the urethral catheter after colorectal surgery in patients having epidural analgesia as part of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programme

Early removal of the urethral catheters is part of the enhanced postoperative recovery programme (ERAS). The effect of epidural anaesthesia on urinary retention was investigated in patients after colorectal resection. A prospective cohort study of all patients having colorectal surgery within an ERAS programme that included insertion of an epidural catheter over the last 5 years. Two-hundred and ten patients had an epidural and a urethral catheter postoperatively. The duration of catheterization was not recorded in one patient who was therefore excluded from the study. One-hundred and eighteen patients had a trial without catheter (TWOC) prior to stopping the epidural (early TWOC). Ninety-one patients had TWOC after the epidural was stopped (late TWOC). Sixteen (7.6%) patients went into urinary retention (14 early TWOC and two late TWOC). The rate of urinary retention in the early TWOC group was significantly higher than that in the late TWOC group (11.9% vs 2.2%; χ(2), P = 0.009). Those who underwent a laparoscopic resection were significantly more likely to have undergone an early TWOC (χ(2), P = 0.001); however, there was no difference in retention rates between open and laparoscopic surgery (χ(2), P = 0.402). Pelvic surgery was not significantly associated with an increased risk of postoperative urinary retention (χ(2), P = 0.627). Male sex was not significantly associated with urinary retention (χ(2), P = 0.087). In the early TWOC group 86% had the catheter removed within 24 hours of surgery. Early TWOC with epidural analgesia running significantly increases the risk of urinary retention; however, it was still successful in 88% of patients.

The Effects of a Standardized Postoperative Enhanced Recovery Program after a Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection in Regard to Patients' Recovery and Clinical Outcomes

Purpose: A multidisciplinary program for early recovery after colorectal surgery has been developed continuously since 2000. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the standardized postoperative enhanced recovery program (SPERP) after a colorectal resection. Methods: The patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection for colorectal cancer were cared for by using the SPERP after surgery. The comparison group consisted of patients who had undergone similar surgery before establishment of the SPERP. The two groups were compared with respect to the patients’ characteristics, operation methods, operation time, blood loss, amounts of intravenous fluid and intravenous antibiotics, complications, postoperative hospital stay, readmission rate, and reoperation rate. Results: The number of patients being treated with the standardized postoperative recovery program, the standardized group (SG), was 63, and that of the traditional group (TG) was 61. Even though the day of oral feeding (1.02 vs. 2.67 days) was faster in the SG, the day of flatus and defecation was not different between two groups. The postoperative hospital stay in the SG (6.76 days) was significantly shorter than that in the TG (10.43 days). The total amount of intravenous fluid after surgery in the SG was 8,574.75 mL, compared with 19,568.22 mL in the TG. The duration of intravenous antibiotics was 2.69 days in the SG and 7.38 days in the TG (P=0.0001). The rates of complication (27.0% in SG vs. 39.3% in TG), reoperation (3.17% vs. 9.84%), and readmission (7.94% vs. 6.56%) did not increase after implementation of this program. Conclusion: The standardized postoperative recovery program reduced the amounts of postoperative intravenous fluid and antibiotics and the postoperative hospital stay without increasing either complications or the readmission rate. A prospective multi-center study of this program is needed.

Evidence-Based Perianesthesia Care: Accelerated Postoperative Recovery Programs

Prolonged stress response after surgery can cause numerous adverse effects, including gastrointestinal dysfunction, muscle wasting, impaired cognition, and cardiopulmonary, infectious, and thromboembolic complications. These events can delay hospital discharge, extend convalescence, and negatively impact long-term prognosis. Recent advances in perioperative management practices have allowed better control of the stress response and improved outcomes for patients undergoing surgery. At the center of the current focus on improved outcomes are evidence-based fast-track surgical techniques and what is commonly referred to as "accelerated postoperative recovery programs." These programs require a multidisciplinary, coordinated effort, and nurses are essential to their successful implementation.

CURRENT TRENDS IN PERIOPERATIVE PAIN MANAGEMENT

Wider use of optimized multimodal accelerated postoperative recovery programs require that anesthesiologists step out of traditional operating room anesthesia roles and even beyond current pain management consultant roles. Development of optimal postoperative recovery services requires close collaboration between anesthesiologists, surgeons, nurses, physical therapists, administrators, and others involved in the management of patients after surgery. Optimization of perioperative care is an ongoing process enhanced by clinical investigation; however, making significant improvements to clinical practice does not have to wait for additional research data, but should proceed now, with broader application of techniques known to enhance rehabilitation and recovery. Based on existing data, the challenges of developing perioperative recovery services seem likely to be rewarded with improved patient outcomes and reduced cost.

ACUTE PAIN CONTROL AND ACCELERATED POSTOPERATIVE SURGICAL RECOVERY

Postoperative pain relief continues to demand our awareness, and surgeons should be fully aware of the potential physiologic benefits of effective dynamic pain relief regimens and the great potential to improve postoperative outcome if such analgesia is used for rehabilitation. To achieve advantageous effects, accelerated multimodal postoperative recovery programs should be developed as a multidisciplinary effort, with integration of postoperative pain management into a postoperative rehabilitation program. This requires revision of traditional care programs, which should be adjusted according to recent knowledge within surgical pathophysiology. Such efforts must be expected to lead to improved quality of care for patients, with less pain and reduced morbidity leading to cost efficiency.

Organizing postoperative accelerated recovery programs.

Organizing postoperative accelerated recovery programs.