Postoperative Debridement Research Articles

Preservation of Olfactory Function After Pediatric Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery with Nasoseptal Flap Reconstruction

ObjectiveEndoscopic endonasal surgery is a feasible approach to lesions of the pediatric skull base. Olfactory outcomes following endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) have been reported in the adult literature, but pediatric outcome data is lacking. The purpose of this preliminary study is to evaluate post-operative olfactory outcomes in pediatric patients who underwent EEA through transsphenoidal and/or transclival corridors. MethodsRetrospective chart review of patients < 18 years of age who underwent EEA with nasoseptal flap skull base reconstruction between March 2019-January 2022. Following their first post-operative debridement and 6 months following surgery, patients were administered the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) to assess olfactory function. ResultsFifteen patients (7 female, 8 male) with a mean age of 14.9 years met inclusion criteria. Thirteen (86.7%) patients required a transsphenoidal approach and 2 (13.3%) patients underwent a combined transsphenoidal and transclival approach. Mean time between surgical resection and first olfactory testing was 6.3 weeks (range 4.6-7.3 weeks). Nine patients (60.0%) had normosmia following EEA while 3 (20.0%) had mild microsmia, and 3 (20.0%) had moderate microsmia at 6 weeks following surgery. Results improved at their 6 month follow up visits. No patients experienced post-operative severe microsmia or anosmia. ConclusionsOlfactory preservation is possible following pediatric EEA, though 40% of patients will develop some degree of microsmia in the immediate post-operative period and 20% will have some persistent dysfunction at 6 months. Long-term data is necessary to determine if microsmia continues to improve over time.

Efficacy of a RADA-16 peptide hydrogel versus chitosan-based polymer in improving patient comfort during postoperative debridement: A randomized controlled trial.

Bioresorbable nasal packing is associated with a decreased incidence of adhesions and bleeding postoperatively after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). However, discomfort during postoperative debridement is still a major area of concern for patients. Our objective was to compare the efficacy of a peptide hydrogel to that of a chitosan-based polymer in reducing pain during debridement after ESS. A prospective, multicenter, randomized, blinded trial was conducted in adults undergoing bilateral total ethmoidectomy for chronic rhinosinusitis. Participants served as their own controls with each subject receiving the hydrogel in a randomized ethmoid cavity and chitosan-based polymer in the contralateral ethmoid cavity. Participants were evaluated at 1, 4, and 12weeks postoperatively. Pain during debridement as well as endoscopic evaluation of mucosal healing and hemostasis were measured. Thirty patients who underwent ESS were included in this trial. During the week 1 postoperative debridement, patients reported significantly less pain on the hydrogel-treated side compared to the chitosan-based polymer-treated side. There were no significant differences in bleeding severity, Lund-Kennedy scores, debridement time, or need for further intervention between the two groups. This study demonstrated the efficacy of a peptide hydrogel inminimizing pain during postoperative debridement.

Mini Endoscopic Septoplasty for High Localized Nasal Septum Deviation: Surgical Technique, Outcomes, and Comparison With Regular Septoplasty.

This prospective cohort study aimed to describe the technique of mini endoscopic septoplasty for patients with a high localized nasal septum deviation in front of the middle turbinate and chronic sinusitis or nasal sinus fungus ball. Our primary objective was to investigate the indications and outcomes of this procedure, and the secondary objective was to compare it with regular endoscopic septoplasty. Patients with chronic sinusitis or nasal sinus fungus ball and high localized nasal septum deviation underwent mini endoscopic septoplasty, while those with a broad deviation of the nasal septum underwent regular endoscopic septoplasty. The study evaluated the procedure duration, blood loss, and complications associated with both methods. All patients were followed up for 3 months. Thirty patients underwent mini endoscopic septoplasty; another 30 underwent regular endoscopic septoplasty. Mini endoscopic septoplasty demonstrated a significantly shorter procedure duration and lower blood loss than regular endoscopic septoplasty. Neither group experienced operative complications, such as nasal septum perforation or hematoma. Mini endoscopic septoplasty is a safe, time-efficient, and effective technique indicated for highly localized nasal septum deviations in patients with chronic sinusitis or nasal sinus fungus ball. This procedure offers advantages in terms of the surgical approach and postoperative debridement. Future research could explore the broader clinical implications of these findings.

Microvascular reconstruction of medication related osteonecrosis of the head and neck.

Medication related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) requiring free flap (FF) reconstruction is uncommon with limited reported findings. Multicenter, retrospective case series of 49 consecutive adult patients presenting with advanced MRONJ requiring FF reconstruction from 2010 to 2022. Perioperative complications and outcomes were analyzed. Eighty-two percent (n = 40) of cases were of the mandible and 18% (n = 9) were of the maxilla. The mean follow-up was 15 months (±19.6). The majority of FF survived (96%, n = 47). FF reconstructions of the maxilla were more likely to require postoperative debridement (56%, 95% CI [27, 81%] vs. 15%, 95% CI [7, 25%], p = 0.008) or develop intraoral bone exposure (56%, 95% CI [27, 81%] vs. 18%, 95% CI [9, 27%], p = 0.02). Most patients (71%, n = 35) received preoperative antibiotics which was associated with a higher rate of FF survival (100% vs. 86%, 95% CI [60, 96%], p = 0.02) and fewer complications. Patients undergoing FF reconstruction for MRONJ do well with high rates of FF success. MRONJ of the maxilla have a higher rate of some complications. Preoperative antibiotics correlated with higher FF survival and fewer postoperative complications.

Post-Operative Endonasal Debridement May Improve Outcomes of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy.

Background: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (endoDCR) has proven to be an effective minimally invasive surgical procedure for treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Post-surgical endonasal debridement has not yet been independently assessed for its impact on functional success. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent endoDCR by an experienced oculofacial plastic surgeon over 7 years (2012-2019). Post-operative intranasal debridement was not routinely performed from March 2012 to February 2016. From March 2016 to June 2019, all patients underwent routine ipsilateral intranasal debridement at post-operative week 2. Surgical success was determined based upon subjective assessment of epiphora resolution at the patient's final post-operative visit. Results: A total of 69 patients (88 surgeries) were included. Thirty-five patients had standard post-operative follow-up without debridement, whereas 34 underwent endonasal debridement at post-operative week 2. Demographics and follow-up were similar between the 2 groups. Functional success was achieved in 84.1% of patients without debridement, and in 97.7% with debridement (P = .058). Conclusion: This review demonstrates a trend toward improvement in the rate of surgical success of endoDCR when routine endonasal debridement was instituted 2 weeks following surgery. We believe that removal of nasal crusts, clots, and residual absorbable gelatin sponge at the osteotomy site improves tear outflow and reduces cicatricial healing enhancing patency of the surgically derived lacrimal-nasal fistula. We advocate for postoperative debridement in the perioperative management of endoDCR patients to optimize successful outcomes.

Association between intraoperative fluid overload and postoperative debridement in major sacrum tumor resection: A propensity score matching study.

Intra-aortic balloon occlusion (IABO) is used to reduce intraoperative bleeding and facilitate successful sacrum tumor resection. Up to 20% of patients experience postoperative wound healing problems, but the risk factors related to this complication have not been clearly defined. The anesthetic database of Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China, was searched for all patients (aged 14‐70 years old) who underwent sacrum tumor surgery with the application of IABO from 2014 to 2017. Data from 278 patients with an aortic occlusion duration of 72 ± 33 minutes were collected. Fifty-six patients required postoperative debridement because of wound infection. The independent risk factor identified by logistic regression was fluid excess (calculated as volume infused minus blood loss and urine output divided by body weight [kg]), and decision tree analysis revealed that the cutoff point for fluid excess was 38.5 mL/kg. Then patients were then divided into high fluid excess group (fluid excess > 38.5 mL/kg) and low fluid excess group (fluid excess ≤ 38.5 mL/kg) and 91 pairs of patients were generated through propensity score matching (PSM). Fluid excess was significantly higher in the high fluid excess group (46 vs 30 mL/kg, P < .001), and more patients required postoperative debridement than in the low fluid excess group (24 (26.3%) vs 12 (13.1%), P < .001). In this retrospective PSM study on sacrum tumor resection, fluid overload was related to postoperative debridement and further studies are needed to improve the clinical prognosis.

Impact of preoperative and intraoperative management on outcomes in osteoradionecrosis requiring free flap reconstruction.

Perioperative management of advanced osteoradionecrosis of the head and neck requiring free flap (FF) reconstruction varies. Our objectives included assessment of practice patterns and outcomes. Multi-institutional, retrospective review of FF reconstruction for head and neck osteoradionecrosis (n=260). Administration of preoperative antibiotics did not correlate with reduction in postoperative complications. Preoperative alcohol use correlated with higher rates of hardware exposure (p=0.03) and 30-day readmission (p=0.04). Patients with FF compromise had higher TSH (p=0.04) and lower albumin levels (p=0.005). Prealbumin levels were lower in patients who required neck washouts (p=0.02) or a second FF (p=0.03). TSH levels were higher in patients undergoing postoperative debridement (p=0.03) or local flap procedures (p=0.04). Malnutrition, hypothyroidism, and substance abuse correlated with a higher incidence of postoperative wound complications in patients undergoing FF reconstruction for advanced osteoradionecrosis. Preoperative antibiotics use did not correlate with a reduction in postoperative wound complications.

Salvage of impending rhinostomy failure after dacryocystorhinostomy with office-based microdebrider treatment.

This article is to introduce office-based salvage revision of impending rhinostomy failure after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR), using a microdebrider. The authors conducted retrospective medical chart review of 27 eyes of 26 patients who underwent microdebrider treatment for impending rhinostomy failure in an office setting. After local anesthesia, obstructive soft tissue, interfering with ostium function (granuloma, cicatrization, synechia), was treated with a microdebrider (Osseoduo s120, Bien-Air Surgery, Le Noirmont, Switzerland) within 6months after primary EN-DCR. Anatomical improvement and functional relief of epiphora were evaluated after revision. The causes of impending rhinostomy failure were granuloma formation (17/27 eyes, 63.0%), cicatrization (8/27 eyes, 29.6%), and synechial formation (2/27 eyes, 7.4%). The surgery did not exceed 5min in all cases, and partial damage to pre-placed silicone tubes occurred in the first two cases (7.4%). Salvage revision resulted in anatomical success in all eyes, based on patent syringing and a positive functional endoscopic dye test. All cases showed improvement of epiphora after revision surgery. Office-based salvage revision using a microdebrider provided effective management of impending rhinostomy failure during early follow-up period after primary EN-DCR. It enabled prompt management of excessive wound healing interfering with ostium function, while performing the routine postoperative nasal debridement.

Radiological Assessment of High Anterior Septal Deviation and Its Impact on Sinus Access.

High anterior septal deviation (HASD) is an underreported anatomic variant that can affect the decision to perform septoplasty for access during sinus surgery and ease of postoperative debridement. This study aims to 1) describe an objective method of assessing HASD, and 2) explore its prevalence and implications for performing septoplasty. Retrospective cross-sectional study. Computed tomography scans from 2014 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Two independent observers measured the following with respect to midline: distance to septum (SDD), distance to lateral nasal wall (LNW), and septal deviation angle (SDA). A total of 147 patients were included, with excellent interrater reliability across 99 patients (0.8-0.9). Mean measurements across all patients were SDD (2.77 mm ± 1.34), SDD/LNW (0.26 ± 0.12), and SDA (8.9° ± 4.0). Of 102 patients who underwent sinus surgery, 47 received septoplasty. Compared to the non-septoplasty cohort, the septoplasty cohort had a greater mean SDD (3.61 mm ± 1.48 vs. 2.27 mm ± 0.95; d=1.10 [95% CI 0.67-1.51]), SDD/LNW (0.34 ± 0.13 vs. 0.21 ± 0.09; d=1.18 [95% CI 0.76-1.60]), and SDA (11.1° ± 4.3 vs. 7.3° ± 3.4; d=1.00 [95% CI 0.58-1.40]). Receiver operating characteristic cutoffs were SDD ≥2.43 mm, SDD/LNW ≥0.25, and SDA ≥7.6°, corresponding to a 49%-58% prevalence of HASD. HASD is relatively common and the methods described herein can reliably assess its dimensions. Measurements of SDD, SDD/LNW, and SDA exceeding cutoffs determined by this study may represent clinically significant deflections prompting consideration of septoplasty. These methods may aid in preoperative planning. 4 Laryngoscope, 132:1166-1171, 2022.

Aerosol generation during routine rhinologic surgeries and in-office procedures.

ObjectiveCadaveric simulations have shown endonasal drilling and cautery generate aerosols, which is a significant concern for otolaryngologists during the COVID‐19 era. This study quantifies aerosol generation during routine rhinologic surgeries and in‐office procedures in live patients.MethodsAerosols ranging from 0.30 to 10.0 μm were measured in real‐time using an optical particle sizer during surgeries and in‐office procedures. Various mask conditions were tested during rigid nasal endoscopy (RNE) and postoperative debridement (POD).ResultsHigher aerosol concentrations (AC) ranging from 2.69 to 10.0 μm were measured during RNE (n = 9) with no mask vs two mask conditions (P = .002 and P = .017). Mean AC (0.30‐10.0 μm) were significantly higher during POD (n = 9) for no mask vs a mask covering the patient's mouth condition (mean difference = 0.16 ± 0.03 particles/cm3, 95% CI 0.10‐0.22, P < .001). There were no discernible spikes in aerosol levels during endoscopic septoplasty (n = 3). Aerosol spikes were measured in two of three functional endoscopic sinus surgeries (FESS) with microdebrider. Using suction mitigation, there were no discernible spikes during powered drilling in two anterior skull base surgeries (ASBS).ConclusionUse of a surgical mask over the patient's mouth during in‐office procedures or a mask with a slit for an endoscope during RNE significantly diminished aerosol generation. However, whether this reduction in aerosol generation is sufficient to prevent transmission of communicable diseases via aerosols was beyond the scope of this study. There were several spikes in aerosols during FESS and ASBS, though none were associated with endonasal drilling with the use of suction mitigation.Level of Evidence4.

Postoperative Debridement versus No Debridement in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

Introduction:This study aimed to assess the long-term effects of postoperative debridement on the 4th and 8th postoperative weeks versus no debridement in terms of subjective and objective outcomes.Materials and Methods:The statistical population of this study (n=80) consisted of 40 patients having chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) and 40 patients having chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP). These samples were randomly divided into two groups of debridement and control. Results:According to the results, 8 weeks after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test questionnaire score (P =0.03), Lund-Kennedy score (P<0.001), nasal blockage (P=0.02), and loss/decrease in sense of smell (P=0.02) in CRSwNP were significantly lower in the debridement group than in the control group. Moreover, 6 months after ESS, in both CRSwNP and CRSsNP, no significant difference was observed between the two groups considering the outcomes (P>0.05).Conclusion:This study showed that debridement could lead to short-term improvements in CRSwNP patients; however, no long-term benefit was observed.

Comparative Study between Angiosome Directed Therapy and non Angiosome Therapy in Treatment of lower limb ischemia

Revascularization of the source artery to the angiosome result in better wound healing and limb salvage rates in comparison to failure of its revascularization as in our study showed that 90% better healing in directed Angiosome concept and 20% in the which Angiosome concept not applied direct revascularization of arteries supplying the target angiosome (wound area) resulting in less complication and no further debridement is needed as in our study only 10% need post operative debridement in comparison to 80% in the other group where Angiosome therapy couldn’t be applied

Open traumatic distal femoral physeal fracture in a pediatric patient with tetrasomy 18p syndrome

Background. Because they are associated with a high energy mechanism, open distal femoral physeal fractures are rare injuries. Appropriate management of these injuries is critical in the pediatric population due to the increased risk of damage to the physis and subsequent growth disturbance and deformity after injury. Pediatric fractures may also represent the sequelae of genetic syndromes (particularly connective tissue disorders), nutritional abnormalities, or conditions that predispose to abnormal bone mineral density.&#x0D; Clinical case. In this case report, we present the case of a 9-year-old girl with tetrasomy 18p who presented with a grossly displaced right open distal femoral physeal fracture in the setting of isolated, lower extremity trauma. The patient underwent an irrigation and debridement, followed by an open reduction and cross-pinning through the distal femoral epiphysis. After the operation, the patient was made non-weight-bearing in a cast for 4 weeks, and at 6 weeks, the pins were removed. The patient had full range of motion at the 6-month follow-up and then resumed her preinjury level of play at school.&#x0D; Discussion. Tetrasomy 18p results in inherent muscle weakness that may interfere in the normal soft tissue sleeve of muscles stabilizing long bones. This may result in greater displacement of fractures sustained during trauma, which may lead to a greater rate of vascular injury, physeal injury, and poor overall prognosis. It is imperative for clinicians to be familiar with tetrasomy 18p and its associated orthopedic manifestations.&#x0D; Conclusion. There is scarce literature on the management of physeal fractures in patients with tetrasomy 18p. In the case described here, we report a good outcome with the standard of care using preoperative and postoperative antibiotics, irrigation and debridement, open fracture fixation, and immobilization in a cast postoperatively. The duration of non-weight-bearing was also increased by 1 week and the pins were removed 1 week later than we would have for patients without any bone or connective tissue disorders.

The efficacy of cotton ball packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial

ObjectiveThe blocking of airflow into sinonasal cavity may decrease postoperative crusting and the development of adhesions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of cotton ball packing in patients following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). MethodsThirty nine patients with chronic rhinosinusitis requiring the same extent of ESS were included. As a part of postoperative care, the patients were instructed to perform a nasal saline irrigation and apply a nasal spray in each nostril, and then informed to put a cotton ball in a one side of nostril, and the other side was kept to be empty as a control. Patients’ subjective symptoms, patients’ pain while receiving sinonasal cavity debridement, time required to perform debridement, and postoperative wound healing were evaluated. ResultsAlthough cotton ball packing resulted in less discomfort for postnasal drip, rhinorrhea, headache, and facial pain than no packing, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. The cotton ball packing was associated with significantly less pain on while performing postoperative debridement, therefore less time was needed to perform debridement. The cotton ball packing appears to improve wound healing within the sinus cavities up to 1 month postoperatively. ConclusionThe use of the cotton ball packing after ESS results in significantly less formation of crusts and adhesions, leading to decreasing pain and time during postoperative debridement and promoting faster wound healing.

Sinonasal debridement versus no debridement for the postoperative care of patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery.

Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is often recommended for symptomatic patients with recurrent acute or chronic rhinosinusitis who have failed conservative treatment. Postoperative care has been felt to be critical for both maintaining the surgical patency of the operated sinuses and improving patient symptoms. Debridement of the sinonasal cavities is one such postoperative care measure that has frequently been studied in the literature, often with conflicting conclusions. To assess the effects of postoperative sinonasal debridement versus no debridement following endoscopic sinus surgery. The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the ENT Trials Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, via the Cochrane Register of Studies); PubMed; EMBASE; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 21 May 2018. Randomised controlled trials comparing postoperative nasal debridement versus no debridement in adult patients with recurrent acute or chronic rhinosinusitis undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery. We included studies in which the patients acted as self-controls (i.e. one side of the nose underwent debridement and the other side did not) only for the secondary endoscopy outcomes. We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcome measures were: health-related quality of life, disease severity (patient-reported symptom scores) and significant adverse effects (bleeding requiring intervention, severe pain, iatrogenic injury). Secondary outcomes were: postoperative endoscopic appearance of the sinonasal surgical cavities (endoscopic scores), recorded use of postoperative medical treatment and rate of revision surgery. We used GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence for each outcome; this is indicated in italics. We included four studies (152 participants), with a follow-up duration ranging from three months to 12 months. In two studies patients acted as self-controls, i.e. one side of the nose underwent debridement and the other side did not ('split-nose' studies). The risk of bias in all studies was high, mostly due to the inability to blind the patients to the debridement procedure.Primary outcomesDisease-specific health-related quality of life scoresOnly one study (58 participants) provided data for disease-specific health-related quality of life. At six months follow-up, lower disease-specific health-related quality of life scores, measured using the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22, range 0 to 110), were noted in the debridement group but the difference was not statistically significant (9.7 in the debridement group versus 10.3 in the control group, P = 0.47) (low-quality evidence).Disease severity (patient-reported symptom score)Only one study (60 participants) provided data for disease severity measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) score. No significant differences in total symptom score were observed between groups postoperatively (low-quality evidence).Significant adverse effectsSignificant adverse effects related to the debridement procedure were not reported in any of the included studies, however it is not clear whether data regarding adverse effects were not collected or if none were indeed observed in any of the included studies.Secondary outcomesAll four studies assessed thepostoperative endoscopic appearance of the sinonasal cavities using the Lund-Kennedy score (range 0 to 10). A pooled analysis of endoscopic scores in the two non 'split-nose' studies revealed better endoscopic scores in the debridement group, however this was not a statistically significant difference (mean difference -0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.35 to 0.72; I² = 0%; two studies; 118 participants) (low-quality evidence). A sub-analysis of the adhesion formation component of the endoscopic score was available for all four studies and revealed a significantly lower adhesion rate in the debridement group (risk ratio 0.43, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.68; I² = 29%; four studies; 152 participants). Analysis of the number needed to treat to benefit revealed that for every three patients undergoing debridement, the endoscopic score would be decreased by one point in one patient. For every five patients undergoing debridement adhesion formation would be prevented in one patient.Use of postoperative medical treatment was reported in all studies, all of which recommended nasal douching. Steroids (systemic or nasal) were administered in two studies. However, the data were very limited and heterogeneous, therefore we could not analyse the impact of concomitant postoperative medical treatment.The rate of revision surgery was not reported in any of the included studies, however it is not clear whether these data were not recorded or if there were no revision surgeries in any of the included studies. We are uncertain about the effects of postoperative sinonasal debridement due to high risk of bias in the included studies and the low quality of the evidence. Sinonasal debridement may make little or no difference to disease-specific health-related quality of life or disease severity. Low-quality evidence suggests that postoperative debridement is associated with a significantly lower risk of adhesions at three months follow-up. Whether this has any impact on longer-term outcomes is unknown.

In vitro analysis of growth patterns of invasive fungal species on commonly used endonasal hemostatic agents

ObjectivePrevious studies have not examined the potential role of endonasal hemostatic agents in facilitating growth of fungal species. We aim to determine the possibility of these to serve as a nutrient source for fungal growth. MethodsCultures of Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Mucor were harvested and placed in solution in sterile saline at standardized high and low concentrations. Thrombin gelatin matrix, carboxyl methylcelluose, and potato starch derivative agents were prepared following manufacturer instructions and applied to two separate Petri dishes per agent. Each substrate was then inoculated with either high or low concentrations of fungal species. Negative and positive control plates with each organism were included. Dishes were sealed, incubated, and examined daily for fourteen days for microscopic and macroscopic growth. ResultsThrombin gelatin matrix was relatively resilient to growth, although Fusarium growth was noted on all packing material by day three. Carboxyl methylcellulose also supported growth of high-concentration Mucor appreciated on day five. The potato starch derivative supported fulminant growth of all fungal species. ConclusionsEndonasal hemostatic agents may be nutrient sources that facilitate growth of fungal species. This may be a consideration in a surgeon's decision to use a hemostatic agent. Prompt initial post-operative debridement may be warranted in select patients. Our findings serve as a model for further testing of fungal growth on other hemostatic materials. Future studies are needed to confirm the clinical significance of these findings in vivo.

Effect of a Chitosan-Based Biodegradable Middle Meatal Dressing after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study

Introduction: The use of biomaterials to improve wound healing after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is not new. Many types of resorbable and non-resorbable materials have been tried as a middle meatal (MM) dressing, spacer, or stent to prevent lateralization of the middle turbinate, formation of synechia, granulation tissue, adhesions and scarring. The FDA has recently approved Chitosan-based nasal dressing/spacers which have optimal wound healing characteristics, including hemostatic and bacteriostatic properties. Herein, we compare a new chitosan-based biomaterial to a popular fully synthetic resorbable dressing in patients undergoing ESS. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was performed comparing a new Chitosan-based bioresorbable nasal dressing (Posi-Sep X) against a previously studied and well known fully synthetic polyurethane-based control (Nasopore). Post-operative outcome metrics included the degree of crusting, amount of retained implant, patient comfort, wound healing, epistaxis, and post-operative infection at two weeks. Results: Thirty-five patients were enrolled and a total seventy implants were placed (n = 70) at the completion of ESS. The results show a statistically significant difference between the Chitosan-based product and the control with respect to wound healing, degree of crusting, and resorption profile. In addition, the Chitosan-based dressing had a markedly lower requirement for post-operative debridement, and a lower incidence of epistaxis and infection, which corresponds to superior patient comfort. Conclusion: Our study is consistent with the biomaterials literature regarding the potential advantages of Chitosan-based MM dressings after ESS regarding improved wound healing, biocompatibility, and patient comfort.

Product comparison model in otolaryngology: Equivalency analysis of absorbable hemostatic agents after endoscopic sinus surgery.

Evidence-based medicine in otolaryngology literature continues to be lacking, especially with regard to new products brought to market. The marketing of products often includes statements of benefit that have limited objective support in research or literature. To address this, and to adequately determine product equivalency/superiority, careful evaluation must be made. In order to establish standards for this process in rhinology products, we directly compare three different absorbable hemostatic agents in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) after undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), using both objective and subjective outcomes. Double-blinded prospective (level 1) comparison and equivalency analysis of three plant-based absorbable hemostatic agents (carboxymethylcellulose [CMC] gel, mucopolysaccharide hemospheres (MPH), and potato starch wafer) in patients undergoing bilateral ESS. Patients with medically refractory CRS who underwent bilateral ESS were recruited and prospectively followed. At the conclusion of ESS, one of three different hemostatic agents was applied to each nasal passage. Subjective patient data was obtained using rated symptoms compared between the two sides (nasal obstruction, bleeding, pain, and nasal discharge) at baseline and on postoperative days 1, 7, and 14. Objective data was obtained by blinded endoscopic scoring to rate mucosal edema, inflammation, granulation, crusting, infection, and synechiae formation on postoperative weeks 1, 3, and 6. Forty-eight patients who underwent ESS for CRS were included. There is no statistical difference in subjective scores for any of the variables measured, although (MPH) nearly reached statistical significance at postoperative day 7 for increased pain (P = 0.06) and obstruction (P = 0.22). Objective measures showed equivalency between all products, except the CMC gel approached significance at week 3 for increased crusting (P = 0.10), granulation (P = 0.24), and debridement (P = 0.07). At 6 weeks, increased debridement (P = 0.14) also approached significance. Careful and deliberate consideration should be taken when choosing products to assist our surgical endeavors. Subjectively, patients treated with MPH showed near-significant increases in pain and obstruction. In objective measures, CMC gel nearly reaches significance for more postoperative debridement, with increased crusting and inflammation. Product choice could consider these factors, although it remains at the discretion of the surgeon. This model of comparison allows careful product comparison and should be applied to other hemostatics, as well as other materials in use in otolaryngology. 1b. Laryngoscope, 126:S5-S13, 2016.

Single seventh day debridement compared to frequent debridement after endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative debridement frequency following endoscopic sinus surgery. Individual randomized controlled trial. Sixty-two adult patients with a diagnosis of chronic rhino sinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (NP) and CRS without NP meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this prospective study. The patients were randomized equally to frequent debridement (FD; at postoperative weeks 1, 2 and 4) or to a single debridement (SD; at postoperative week 1) after surgery. The outcomes were assessed with visual analog scale (VAS) for nine main symptoms concerning patient discomfort within the first 4 weeks, with the modified Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score (MLKES) at weeks 4 and 24 and with the sino-nasal outcome test-20 (SNOT-20) at week 24. Thirty-seven of the patients were male, and twenty-five were female. The mean age was 36.1 ± 13.5 in FD group and 39.2 ± 14.7 in SD group. In the SD group, the VAS scores at postoperative week four showed significantly less discomfort at visits (p = 0.004) and less negative effects on their work (p = 0.013). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the week 4 and 24 MLKES and in the week 24 SNOT-20 scores (p > 0.05). The endoscopic findings did not show significant differences between the groups. Our data indicate that FD causes more discomfort at the required visits, more facial pain and more negative effects on patients' work; this method is not superior to postoperative single seventh day debridement in terms of the 24-week quality of life and endoscopic scores. 1b.

Postoperative nasal debridement following functional endoscopic sinus surgery, a systematic review of the literature.

Chronic rhinosinusitis is a significant health problem, and the optimal postoperative treatment regime for patients post functional endoscopic sinus surgery has been a topic debated for years. To systematically review and critically evaluate the evidence relating to postoperative debridement of the nasal cavity following functional endoscopic sinus surgery to guide best practice. A search of the following databases was performed: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, and Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials. Ovid Medline, EMBASE, Pubmed. The following key words were used: Postoperative, functional endoscopic sinus surgery, sinus surgery, debridement, follow-up, from 1970 to 2013. Two independent reviewers assessed the relevant articles using the consort guidance on systematic reviews Moher etal. BMJ 2010; 340: c869. The best evidence available was 1B, with six Randomsied control trial (RCTs) identified. Four studies compared debridement against no debridement, and two looked at the frequency of the debridement. Cumulatively, results for 337 patients were included. Visual analogue scores were used in all studies. None of the results at the long-term follow-up showed any difference in sino-nasal outcome test scores or objective endoscopic scores. Four of the six studies demonstrated some benefit in symptom scores but only one in the long term. Two papers demonstrated the debridement group suffered more pain in the postoperative period. Currently, there is no clear evidence for frequent postoperative debridement. Further well-designed RCTs are required to establish clear benefit, optimal frequency, extent and timing of debridement.