Postoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels Research Articles

Prognostic value of the postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is one of the commonly used preoperative biomarkers for colorectal cancer (CRC), but no meta-analysis has evaluated the findings of all recently published studies to determine whether its postoperative level can serve as a prognostic indicator. We conducted a systematic search for eligible literature from the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases in October 2023. Studies that investigated the relationship between postoperative serum CEA levels and prognosis in CRC patients were included. Outcome indicators, including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS), were analyzed using a fixed-effects or random-effects model. The pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as effective values. This meta-analysis included 20 eligible studies involving 10,114 CRC patients from the East Asian and Western countries. A comprehensive analysis revealed that elevated postoperative CEA levels were associated with low OS (HR: 2.92, 95% CI: 2.36-3.62, and p<0.000), DFS (HR: 2.81, 95% CI: 2.01-3.94, and p<0.000), and RFS/PFS (HR: 2.52, 95% CI: 1.75-3.62, p<0.000). A subgroup analysis by region, analysis type, distant metastasis, HR obtain method, sample size, postoperative measurement date, and study design demonstrated that the negative correlation observed between high serum CEA levels after surgery and poor prognosis was not significantly different between the subgroups. When CEA levels are found to be elevated during postoperative follow-up, more active intervention measures should be implemented to further improve the patient's survival outcomes.

Elevated postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen guides adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer: a multicentre cohort retrospective study

Most clinical doctors rely on high-risk factors recommended by guidelines to decide whether to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. However, these high-risk factors do not include postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). This study aims to explore the elevation of postoperative CEA as a risk factor, in addition to other high-risk factors, to guide adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II colon cancer. A retrospective analysis was conducted on stage II colon cancer patients who underwent curative surgery at Yunnan Cancer Hospital and The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University from April 2008 to January 2019. Patients were classified into three groups based on high-risk factors recommended by guidelines and postoperative CEA levels: low-risk with normal postoperative CEA, low-risk with elevated postoperative CEA and high-risk. COX regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors affecting patients’ recurrence free survival (RFS). The Kaplan–Meier method was used to create the patients’ RFS curve. The restricted cubic spline (RCS) curve was used to assess the correlation between postoperative CEA and RFS on a continuous scale. Among 761 patients, there were 444 males (62.01%), with a median [IQR] age of 58.0 (18.0–88.0) years. A group of 425 high-risk patients had a 3-year RFS of 82.2% (95% CI 78.5–86.1%), while a group of 291 low-risk patients had a 3-year RFS of 89.7% (95% CI 86.1–93.5%). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (HR 1.83; 95% CI 1.22–2.74; P = 0.0067). Among them, the 3-year RFS of 261 low-risk patients with normal postoperative CEA was 93.6% (95% CI 90.5–96.8%), while the 3-year RFS of 30 low-risk patients with elevated postoperative CEA was 57.3% (95% CI 41.8–71.4%). There was a significant difference compared to the 3-year RFS of 425 high-risk patients (overall log-rank P < 0.0001). The multivariate analysis adjusted by the COX proportional hazards model showed that low-risk patients with elevated postoperative CEA patients (HR 14.95, 95% CI 4.51–49.63, P < 0.0001) was independently associated with a 3-year RFS. The restricted cubic spline model showed that in stage II colon cancer patients with tumor diameter > 1.955 ng/mL, the risk of postoperative recurrence increased with increasing postoperative CEA levels. Patients with elevated postoperative CEA levels have a significantly increased risk of recurrence. They should be included as high-risk factors to guide adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer.

Development and validation of nomograms based on pre-/post-operative CEA and CA19-9 for survival predicting in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients after radical resection.

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) are the predominant serum tumour markers (STMs) for predicting the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). The objective of this research is to develop clinical prediction models based on preoperative and postoperative CEA and CA19-9 levels. 1,452 consecutive participants with stage I-III colorectal cancer were included. Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and multivariate COX regression were used to evaluate the significance of preoperative and postoperative STMs. Patients were grouped into a discovery cohort (70%) and a validation cohort (30%). Variables for the nomograms were selected according to the Akaike information criterion (AIC). Subsequently, two clinical predictive models were constructed, evaluated, validated, and then compared with the AJCC 8th TNM stage. The overall survival (OS) rate and disease-free survival(DFS) rate declined progressively as the number of positive tumour markers(NPTMs) before and after surgery increased. For both OS and DFS, age, sex, pN stage, and NPTMs before and after surgery were independent prognostic factors, and then clinical prediction models were developed. The Concordance index (C-index), Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, Decision curve analysis (DCA), and risk score stratification all indicated that the models possessed robust predictive efficacy and clinical applicability. The Net reclassification index (NRI) and Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) indicated that the performance of models was significantly superior to the TNM stage. Nomograms based on pre-and postoperative CEA and CA19-9 can accurately predict survival and recurrence for stage I-III CRC patients after radical surgery, and were significantly better than the AJCC 8th TNM stage.

Prognostic role of serum carcinoembryonic antigen in patients receiving liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastasis: A meta-analysis.

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a broad-spectrum tumor marker for differential diagnosis, monitoring, and response assessment of a variety of malignancies. To evaluate whether serum CEA could predict the prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM) before and after liver resection (LR). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were systematically searched to retrieve literature, with a search cut-off date of February 27, 2023. Articles were strictly screened for inclusion according to pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were pooled and analyzed using Stata 16.0. This meta-analysis included 36 studies involving a total of 11143 CRCLM patients. The results showed that a high pre-LR serum CEA level was correlated with poor overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49-1.75, P < 0.001] and recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.27, 95%CI: 1.11-1.45, P < 0.001) in CRCLM patients. A high post-LR serum CEA level predicted poor OS (HR = 2.66, 95%CI: 2.10-3.38, P < 0.001). A comparison by treatment modality, analysis modality, patient source, and cutoff-value showed that overall, high preoperative and postoperative serum CEA levels remained correlated with a poor prognosis. This study concluded that high pre-LR and post-LR serum CEA levels were significantly correlated with a poor prognosis in CRCLM patients.

Clinical utility of the carcinoembryonic antigen level in patients with stage III colon cancer after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy.

The association between perioperative and post-adjuvant carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and recurrence and prognosis remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate whether perioperative CEA levels are an integral component of the assessment of recurrence and prognosis of patients with stage III colon cancer (CC). This retrospective study was conducted at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research from 2005 to 2013. We enrolled patients with stage III CC who underwent complete resection of a primary tumor and received adjuvant chemotherapy. We analyzed the association between perioperative and post-adjuvant CEA levels and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 564 consecutive patients were included in the analysis. The RFS and OS of patients with high postoperative CEA levels were significantly worse than those of patients with normal postoperative CEA levels. In the multivariate analysis, high postoperative CEA levels were associated with shorter RFS and OS. The number of risk factors, postoperative CEA levels, and T/N-stage all had a cumulative effect on RFS and OS. High postoperative CEA levels and the number of risk factors are associated with recurrence and worse prognosis for patients with stage III CC.

Unexplained increases in serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels in colorectal cancer patients during the postoperative follow-up period: an analysis of its incidence and longitudinal pattern

Background Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) monitoring facilitates the detection of recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) after resection. False-positive CEA has been reported in CRC patients with certain comorbidities or smokers. However, limited information is currently available on the frequency of and changes in falsely elevated CEA levels in patients without these conditions. Materials and methods We retrospectively examined CRC patients who underwent surgical resection at our hospital between 2001 and 2017, had no recurrence for at least five years, and were free of known factors that may increase CEA. Postoperative CEA levels were retrieved until 2 years before the last contact. For comparison, we similarly selected patients who developed recurrence after resection of CRC during the same period, and CEA levels at initial presentation, at nadir, and at the time of recurrence were reviewed. The patterns of elevated CEA (>5 ng/ml) were classified as transient, repeated, or persistent based on longitudinal changes. The relationships between CEA and carbohydrate antigen 19-9, transaminases, creatinine, and C-reactive protein were examined. Results CEA elevation occurred in 90 (20%) out of 446 eligible patients without recurrence at least once during the mean postoperative period of 50.5 months, whereas CEA was >5 ng/ml in 117 (53%) of 221 patients when they developed recurrence. Twenty-seven patients without recurrence showed a transient elevation in CEA, 45 repeated elevations, and 18 a persistent elevation; the frequency of a high preoperative CEA level increased in this order. The majority (98%) of false elevations ranged between 5 and 15 ng/ml. CEA was not associated with other laboratory data. Conclusions Unexplained CEA elevations were observed in 20% of recurrence-free CRC patients after surgery, and were classified into three patterns based on longitudinal changes. A more detailed understanding of patient-specific fluctuations in CEA will prevent unnecessary imaging studies and reduce medical costs.

Biliary Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Levels: The Role in Detection of Occult Hepatic Metastases in Colorectal Carcinoma

Objective: Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is a major public health concern, often complicated by hepatic metastasis. Despite the widespread use of serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) for postoperative monitoring, early detection of hepatic metastasis remains elusive. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of CEA levels in both peripheral blood and gallbladder bile for predicting hepatic metastasis in CRC patients, and to explore its potential utility for personalized treatment regimens. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized study was conducted over three years, enrolling 31 participants, 21 of whom underwent curative operations for CRC. Preoperative and postoperative CEA levels were assessed with rigorous diagnostic imaging and histological examinations. Patients were stratified into groups based on liver metastasis, postoperative chemotherapy, and CEA levels in both blood and bile. Results: A statistically significant difference was found in biliary CEA levels between patients with (mean = 129.22 ng/ml) and without intraoperative liver metastasis (mean = 33.16 ng/ml), p-value = 0.01. Serum and biliary CEA levels were robustly correlated, p &gt; 0.05. Biliary CEA values differed significantly across Duke's stages, with particular significance between the control group and Duke's stage D (p &lt; 0.001). Among patients without intraoperative liver metastasis but with biliary CEA &gt;10 ng/ml, 80% developed liver metastasis postoperatively despite undergoing chemotherapy. Conclusion: This research highlights the pivotal role of biliary CEA levels in diagnosing latent hepatic metastases in colorectal cancer. Demonstrating superior sensitivity compared to traditional serum tests, biliary CEA presents a potential shift in early detection. Elevated levels suggest expanded therapeutic options, from timely hepatectomies to adopting radiofrequency ablation and anti-CEA monoclonal antibodies, enhancing the likelihood of better patient outcomes. Essentially, these findings enhance our understanding of colorectal cancer, emphasizing the importance of personalized care, early diagnosis, and customized treatments, thereby directing us toward better patient outcomes.

Postoperative serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen and carcinoembryonic antigen predict overall survival in surgical patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Tumor markers are routinely used in clinical practice. However, for resectable patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), they are applied infrequently as their prognostic significance is incompletely understood. This historical cohort study included 2769 patients with resected ESCC from 2011 to 2018 in a high-risk area in northern China. Their clinical data were extracted from the Electronic Medical Record. Survival analysis of eight common tumor markers was performed with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regressions. With a median follow-up of 39.5 months, 901 deaths occurred. Among the eight target markers, elevated postoperative serum SCC (Squamous cell carcinoma antigen) and CEA (Carcinoembryonic antigen) predicted poor overall survival (SCC HRadjusted: 2.67, 95% CI: 1.70-4.17; CEA HRadjusted: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.14-4.86). In contrast, preoperative levels were not significantly associated with survival. Stratified analysis also demonstrated poorer survival in seropositive groups of postoperative SCC and CEA within each TNM stage. The above associations were generally robust using different quantiles of concentrations above the upper limit of the clinical normal range as alternative cutoffs. Regarding temporal trends of serum levels, SCC and CEA were similar. Their concentrations fell rapidly after surgery and thereafter remained relatively stable. Postoperative serum SCC and CEA levels predict the overall survival of ESCC surgical patients. More importance should be attached to the use of these markers in clinical applications.

Role of post-operative carcinoembryonic antigen as predictor of outcome: Evaluation of patients with colorectal malignancy at a tertiary care center

Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide. The colorectal cancer has varied presentation and often patients present in late stages of disease. Pre-operative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are indicative of tumor stage and thus are predictive of prognosis. However, the importance of post-operative CEA value is seldom discussed and utility of this clinically relevant parameter needs to be established to predict survival of subjects after surgical resection of tumor. Aims and Objectives: This study aims to understand the colorectal malignancy in a group of population and evaluate its complexity, clinical presentations, modalities of treatment, and its complications. Furthermore, we aimed to access predictive utility of post-operative CEA levels for forecasting the long-term outcome in the patient. Materials and Methods: All subjects with diagnosed cases of colorectal malignancy were included in the study. The subjects presenting complaints were clinically examined and the observations were noted. Colonoscopy and histopathological investigations were scheduled, and based on CT findings, further management was planned. Carcinoembryonic antigen levels were assessed in pre-operative and post-operative serum sample. Follow-up was done at regular intervals. CEA levels in subjects with different outcome were compared retrospectively. Results: The most common age group of subjects with colorectal malignancies was 51–60 years. Bleeding per rectum was the most common symptom and the most common sign was per rectal palpable mass. Laparoscopic surgery had less hospital stay, less blood loss, and lower rate of wound site infection. The pre-operative CEA levels were found to be matched; however, post-operative CEA levels were found to be significantly elevated in non-survivor subjects compared to those who survived. Conclusion: Patients with high post-operative CEA values should be closely followed up for relapse and dealt with more caution to reduce the mortality.

Clinical Usefulness of Postoperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Patients with Colorectal Cancer with Liver Metastases.

Colorectal cancer with liver metastasis (CLM) has high postoperative recurrence rates; therefore, optimizing perioperative treatment is imperative. Postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) can aid in detecting minimal residual disease in colon cancer following curative resection. This study aimed to identify the potential role of serum CEA following liver resection in patients with CLM. This retrospective study was conducted at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research from 2004 to 2018 and enrolled patients with CLM who underwent complete resection of primary tumors and CLM. Associations between perioperative CEA levels and characteristics of recurrence were investigated. Recurrence was detected during a median follow-up period of 90.1 months in 343 (54.2%) out of 633 analyzed patients. Patients in the postoperative CEA level > 5 ng/ml group had a significantly higher recurrence rate (75.7% versus 50.0%,p < 0.01) and shorter time until recurrence (4.4 versus 36.9 months,p < 0.01) than those in the postoperative CEA level ≤ 5 ng/ml group. Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative CEA level > 5 ng/ml was an independent predictor, with hazard ratios of 2.77 (p < 0.01) for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 3.18 (p < 0.01) for overall survival (OS). Additionally, RFS was significantly shorter among patients in the postoperative CEA level > 5 ng/ml group who did not have normalized CEA levels following adjuvant chemotherapy than among those in the normalized CEA group. The postoperative and post-adjuvant chemotherapy CEA levels in the CEA level > 5 ng/ml group may be predictors of RFS and OS.

Prognostic Value of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Changes Before and After Operation for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

To study the prognostic significance of changes in the level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) before and after surgery on the long-term prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients with ESCC who underwent radical esophagectomy (between 2010 and 2017) were divided into three groups as follows: normal group (preoperative CEA≦1.6ng/ml), normalized group (preoperative CEA &gt; 1.6ng/ml and postoperative CEA≦1.6ng/ml) and non-normalized group (preoperative CEA &gt; 1.6ng/ml and postoperative CEA &gt; 1.6ng/ml). The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to construct survival curves. Cox proportional hazards regression models was used to determine the independent prognostic factors for ESCC. Variables with P &lt; 0.1 in univariable analysis were included in the multivariable model used to determine the independent risk factors. A total of 394 patients were included. The 5-OS rate of ESCC patients in normalized group (n = 36) and non-normalized group (n = 161) were significantly shorter than normal group (n =197) patients (57.3% vs 58.3% vs 82.0%, P &lt; 0.001). The difference in survival time distribution between normal group and normalized/non-normalized group is statistically significant, P &lt; 0.001. However, there was no statistically significant variation in survival time distribution between the normalized and non-normalized groups, P = 0.289. In multivariate analysis, older age (&gt; 65years old), advanced pT-stage, advanced pN-stage, normalized group and non-normalized group were independent prognostic risk factors of worse overall survival. ESCC patients with high preoperative CEA level had poorer prognosis regardless of the changes of postoperative CEA level.

Effect of more versus less frequent abdominopelvic computed tomography follow-up testing on overall survival in patients with stage II or III colon cancer.

3604 Background: Patients with colon cancer undergo an abdominopelvic computed tomography (AP-CT) scan surveillance every 6-12 months for five years after surgery. However, evidence of survival benefit from more intensive AP-CT patients in stage II and III colon cancer is still elusive. Methods: A total of 2,137 patients with stage II-III colon cancer who received curative aim surgery were analyzed in the Yonsei Cancer Registry Database between Jan 1, 2005, to Dec 31, 2015. The surveillance start date was defined as 90 days after curative resection or one day after adjuvant chemotherapy. All patients had at least one AP-CT for two years after the surveillance period. The average interval of AP-CT per patient was calculated as the postoperative surveillance duration divided by the number of AP-CT examinations. Patients who underwent AP-CT with an average interval of 6 months and 12 months were assigned to the high-frequent and low-frequent surveillance groups. Association of AP-CT frequency and demographic factors with overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. Results: Among 2,137 patients who underwent curative aim surgery, the median intervals of AP-CT scan were 6.1 months in high-frequent surveillance and 10.8 months in the less-frequent surveillance group, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was not significantly different in both groups; however, OS was significantly longer in the high-frequent surveillance group of patients who harvested lymph nodes less than 12 in curative resection ( P = 0.015) or measured postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level higher than 5 ng/ml ( P = 0.023). Of note, high-frequent surveillance group detected liver metastasis earlier (6.7 months) than the low-frequent group, leading to more curative aim metastasectomy (28.0% vs 4.3%, P = 0.020), and significantly longer 5-year OS (62.2% vs 34.8%, P = 0.017). Multivariate analysis showed that harvesting lymph nodes less than 12 (HR = 4.37, P = 0.004) and postoperative CEA level higher than 5 ng/ml (HR = 7.39, P &lt; 0.001) were prognostic factors for overall survival. Conclusions: The average interval of AP-CT in patients with stage II-III colon cancer is not associated with improved OS. However, a high-frequent AP-CT enabled early detection of liver metastases, leading to the improved OS in high-risk patients, including the number of harvested lymph nodes less than 12 or postoperative CEA level is higher than 5 ng/ml. The risk-stratified approach is warranted to guide postoperative colon cancer surveillance.

The time-dependent changes in serum carcinoembryonic antigen impact on posthepatectomy outcomes of colorectal liver metastasis

BackgroundOnly a few studies have examined the impact of carcinoembryonic antigen variation in patients before and after curative resection of colorectal liver metastasis . This study examined the correlation between carcinoembryonic antigen levels and patient prognosis. MethodsPatients who underwent curative resection for colorectal liver metastasis between 2000 and 2017 were enrolled. This study examined patients with high preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels that normalized after resection of colorectal liver metastasis and the correlation between prognosis and time-dependent changes in carcinoembryonic antigen levels. The similarity in the risk of recurrence in patients with normal preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels was evaluated. ResultsA total of 143 consecutive patients were included in the study cohort and classified into the normal preoperative (46 patients), normalized postoperative (57 patients), and elevated preoperative and postoperative (40 patients) carcinoembryonic antigen groups. All clinicopathologic characteristics were comparable between patients grouped according to carcinoembryonic antigen levels. The 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates for all patients were 30.4% and 56.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed that elevated preoperative and postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels (hazard ratio = 1.73, 95% confidence interval: 1.04–2.87) were independently associated with poor disease-free survival; normalization of postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (hazard ratio = 0.94, 95% confidence interval: 0.57–1.53) was statistically indistinguishable from normal preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels. The risk of recurrence was similar to that of patients with normal preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels ConclusionPatients with elevated preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels that normalized after resection of colorectal liver metastasis were not at risk of poor disease-free survival. Elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels after surgery are independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival.

Clinical usefulness of postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases.

178 Background: Colorectal cancer with liver metastases (CLM) has high post operative recurrence rates, and optimizing the perioperative treatment is imperative. Post operative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) can help detecting minimal residual disease in colon cancer after curative resection. Methods: The aim of this study was to identify the potential role of serum CEA after liver resection in patients with CLM. This study was conducted at the Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research from 2004 to 2018. Patients with CLM who underwent complete resection of primary tumors and liver metastases were enrolled in this study. We studied the associations between the perioperative CEA levels and characteristics of recurrence. Results: Recurrence was detected during the median follow-up time of 50.9 months in 343 (54.1%) of the total 633 patients analyzed. Patients with postoperative CEA (&gt;5) group had a significantly higher recurrence rate (75.7% vs 50.0%, p &lt; 0.01), with a shorter time until recurrence (4.4 months vs 36.9 months, p &lt; 0.01) than those with a postoperative CEA level (≤5) group. In multivariate analysis, a postoperative CEA level &gt;5 ng/ ml was an independent predictor, with the highest hazard ratio for both recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) (RFS: 2.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.14–3.60, p &lt;0.01, OS: 3.18, 95% CI 2.41–4.19, p &lt;0.01). In addition, there was a significantly shorter RFS in the postoperative CEA level (&gt;5) group who did not have normalized CEA levels after adjuvant chemotherapy compared to normalized CEA group (3.3 months vs 18.5 months, p = 0.008). Conclusions: The postoperative CEA and postadjuvant chemotherapy CEA level in the CEA level (&gt;5) group after surgery may be a predictor of RFS and OS.

Association Between Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels at Different Perioperative Time Points and Colorectal Cancer Outcomes.

BackgroundWhether elevated postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are prognostic in patients with stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial.Patients and MethodsPrimary and sensitivity analysis populations were obtained from a retrospective, multicenter longitudinal cohort including consecutive patients without neoadjuvant treatment undergoing curative resection for stage I–III CRC. Serum CEA levels before (CEApre-m1) and within 1 (CEApost-m1), 2–3 (CEApost-m2–3), and 4–6 months (CEApost-m4–6) after surgery were obtained, and their associations with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Cox regression. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed.ResultsPrimary and sensitivity analysis populations included 710 [415 men; age, 54.8 (11.6) years] and 1556 patients [941 men; age, 56.2 (11.8) years], respectively. Recurrence hazard ratios (HRs) in the elevated CEApre-m1, CEApost-m1, CEApost-m2–3, and CEApost-m4–6 groups were 1.30 (95% CI: 0.91–1.85), 1.53 (95% CI: 0.89–2.62), 1.88 (95% CI: 1.08–3.28), and 1.15 (95% CI: 0.91–1.85), respectively. The HRs of the elevated CEApre-m1, CEApost-m1, CEApost-m2–3, and CEApost-m4–6 groups for OS were 1.09 (95% CI: 0.60–1.97), 2.78 (95% CI: 1.34–5.79), 2.81 (95% CI: 1.25–6.30), and 3.30 (95% CI: 1.67–.536), respectively. Adjusted multivariate analyses showed that both in the primary and sensitivity analysis populations, elevated CEApost-m2–3, rather than CEApre-m1, CEApost-m1, and CEApost-m4–6, was an independent risk factor for recurrence, but not for OS. The RFS in the elevated and normal CEApost-m2–3 groups differed significantly among patients with stage II disease [n = 266; HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.02–8.24 (primary analysis); n = 612; HR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.34–5.38 (sensitivity analysis)].ConclusionsElevated postoperative CEA levels are prognostic in patients with stage II CRC, with 2–3 months after surgery being the optimal timing for CEA measurement.

Laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with transverse colon cancer: short-term and oncological outcomes.

BackgroundStudies evaluating the outcomes after laparoscopic resections of transverse colon cancers are scant. This manuscript aimed to compare surgical and oncological outcomes after laparoscopic (Lap) and open procedures for transverse colon carcinomas.MethodsAll consecutive patients who underwent resection for a cancer located in the transverse colon between 2003 and 2019 were reviewed. Patients were categorized according to the surgical approach (Lap versus open) and groups were compared. Outcome measures were the short-term results, complications and functional recovery; moreover, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared overall and after propensity score matching (PSM) based on age, sex, ASA classification, BMI, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, use of postoperative chemotherapy, location of tumour, stage and grading, operation time, blood loss and complications.ResultsOf 248 transverse resections reviewed, 146 (81 Lap and 65 open) were selected for data analysis. Blood loss, fluid intake and the incidence of wound infection were significantly lower and the hospital stay was significantly shorter in the Lap group (P < 0.001). The operation time and incidence of complications (Clavien–Dindo classification grade 3 or above) did not differ significantly between the two groups. Mean follow-up was of 75.4 months in the Lap group and 78.6 months in the open group. Regression analyses showed that OS was associated with the postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (hazard ratio 1.18 (95 per cent c.i. 1.10 to 1.27); P < 0.001), BMI (hazard ratio 0.81 (95 per cent c.i. 0.68 to 0.96); P = 0.017), operation time (hazard ratio 0.99 (95 per cent c.i. 0.97 to 1.00; P = 0.010), and postoperative chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.27 (95 per cent c.i. 0.08 to 0.96); P = 0.042), while RFS was associated with the postoperative CEA level (hazard ratio 1.13 (95 per cent c.i. 1.07 to 1.20); P < 0.001). PSM selected 42 patients for data comparison of long-term results, and showed no significant differences between groups (RFS: P = 0.530; OS: P = 0.561).ConclusionLap and open resections for transverse colon cancer provided similar outcomes in terms of severe post-operative complication and long-term results.

The robust performance of carcinoembryonic antigen levels after adjuvant chemotherapy for the recurrence risk stratification in patients with colorectal cancer.

Most guidelines of colorectal cancers (CRCs) recommend evaluating the serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level during postoperative surveillance to detect tumor recurrence, which originates from postsurgery residual tumor cells. We hypothesized that the postadjuvant chemotherapy CEA level may be the most accurate biomarker to predict tumor recurrence, and we evaluated the prognostic significance of the postadjuvant chemotherapy CEA level in patients with stage II and III CRCs. We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 150 Stage II-III CRC patients who had undergone curative surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Preoperative, postoperative, and postadjuvant chemotherapy CEA levels were evaluated, and their associations with recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that a high preoperative CEA level, high postoperative CEA, and high postadjuvant chemotherapy CEA were associated with poor RFS (p = .001, .0001, and .001, respectively). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that high postadjuvant chemotherapy CEA was an independent factor for poor RFS (HR 2.55, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-6.05, p = .033), whereas high preoperative and postoperative CEA levels were not. The serum levels of postadjuvant chemotherapy CEA were a strong prognostic biomarker in patients with Stage II-III CRCs who had undergone surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.

Why recurrence was initially suspected during colorectal cancer postoperative surveillance?: A retrospective analysis.

Routine postoperative surveillance is recommended for the patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to clarify the conditions indicate initial suspicion of CRC recurrence in different preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level groups, including positive physical signs/symptoms, elevated CEA level, positive radiologic studies results, and other elevated tumor markers.A total of 2268 patients with recurrence after curative surgery for CRC were enrolled in this study. The patients were classified into 3 groups according to preoperative serum CEA level (low, <2 ng/mL; intermediate, ≥2 and <5 ng/mL; and high, ≥5 ng/mL).Up to 63.6% of recurrence was suspected based on elevated CEA level in the high preoperative serum CEA level group. Patients in the low preoperative serum CEA level group had a higher rate of initial suspicion of recurrence based on positive physical signs or symptoms (36.7% vs 26.9% vs 20.4%, P < .001) and positive radiologic findings (51.4% vs 40.7% vs 29.5%, P < .001) than those in the intermediate and high preoperative serum CEA groups.Conditions indicate initial suspicion of recurrence varied in the different preoperative serum CEA level groups. In patients with low preoperative serum CEA level, the detection of recurrence depend on abnormal CEA level is less sensitive than intermediate and high preoperative serum CEA groups. We suggest that the strategy for CRC surveillance should not depend on serum CEA level alone. The signs or symptoms of patients, changes in postoperative serial CEA level, and ongoing radiologic or imaging findings must be cautiously monitored.

Postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels cannot predict survival in colorectal cancer patients with type II diabetes

Background:Most clinical guidelines recommend measuring postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels to predict the prognosis of colorectal cancer. However, type II diabetes can increase serum CEA levels which may bias the prognosis. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the impact of type II diabetes on CEA prognostic accuracy in colorectal cancer.Methods:This retrospective cohort study included 407 patients who underwent curative resection for stage I to III colorectal adenocarcinoma in a single institution between January 2010 and June 2018. The patients were categorized into two groups according to their postoperative serum CEA levels: group A <5.0 ng/mL (n = 341) and group B ≥5.0 ng/mL (n = 66). Patients were also categorized into two subgroups according to their history of type II diabetes: patients with type II diabetes mellitus (n = 112) and patients without type II diabetes (n = 295).Results:The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were significantly higher in patients with normal postoperative CEA (group A, 83.8%) than in patients with elevated preoperative and postoperative CEA (group B, 63.6%) (p < 0.001). However, although patients with type II diabetes mellitus had higher postoperative CEA levels than those without type II diabetes mellitus (3.1 vs 2.5 ng/mL, p < 0.001), group B patients with type II diabetes mellitus had a significantly higher 3-year DFS rate than those without type II diabetes mellitus (80.0% vs 55.6%, p = 0.003).Conclusion:Type II diabetes was associated with higher preoperative and postoperative CEA levels in patients with colorectal cancer. Consequently, elevated postoperative CEA level was not associated with shorter 3-year DFS in patients with type II diabetes, as opposed to patients without type II diabetes. Therefore, colorectal cancer patients with type II diabetes may need alternative tumor markers to be used during the surveillance strategy after curative surgery.

Prognostic implications of preoperative versus postoperative circulating tumor DNA in surgically resected lung cancer patients: a pilot study.

BackgroundRecent studies of advanced lung cancer patients have shown that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is useful for molecular profiling, monitoring tumor burden, and predicting therapeutic efficacies and disease progression. However, the usefulness of ctDNA analysis in surgically resected lung cancers is unclear.MethodsThis study included 20 lung cancer patients with clinical stage IIA–IIIA disease. Preoperative and postoperative (3–12 days) plasma samples were collected for ctDNA analysis. Cancer personalized profiling by deep sequencing, which can detect mutations in 197 cancer-related genes, was used for ctDNA detection. The cohort consisted of 18 men and 2 women with a median age of 69 (range, 37–88) years. Sixteen patients (80%) had a history of smoking. Histologically, there were four squamous cell carcinomas, 13 adenocarcinomas, two adenosquamous cell carcinomas, and one small cell carcinoma.ResultsAt the time of data analysis, the 20 patients had been monitored for a median follow-up of 12 months. Eight patients (40%) were positive for preoperative ctDNA, and this was significantly correlated with tumor size (≥5 vs. <5 cm, P=0.018). Four patients (20%) were positive for postoperative ctDNA, and this was significantly correlated with histological grade (3 vs. 1 or 2, P=0.032). Postoperative positivity for ctDNA also predicted shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P=0.015), while pre- and post-operative carcinoembryonic antigen levels (P=0.150 and P=0.533, respectively) and preoperative positivity for ctDNA (P=0.132) were not correlated with RFS.ConclusionsDetecting ctDNA postoperatively was a poor prognostic factor in surgically resected lung cancer patients that may suggest there is minimal residual disease (MRD).