Postoperative Antibiotics Research Articles

A causal model for predicting the impact of pharmacotherapy on colorectal surgery outcomes.

Evidence-based principles in enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) demonstrate substantial improvement in patient outcomes. Determining which latent variables predict composite outcomes could refine ERP pharmacotherapy recommendations. Using R, pharmacotherapy data were modeled from an existing dataset of adult elective colorectal surgery patients. Primary composite outcome was absence of surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and other in-hospital postoperative complications (POCs). Secondary composite outcome included no postdischarge POCs, hospital length of stay ≤3days, and no readmission at 7- or 30-days. Variables with greater odds of predicting both positive primary and secondary composite outcomes included prehospital oral iron and oral antibiotic use, postoperative sugammadex and neostigmine use, postoperative morphine milligram equivalents (MME)≤50, and IV fluid stop by postoperative day 2. Preoperative scopolamine patch (OR=0.29 and CI=-0.19-0.77) and perioperative gabapentin (OR=0.46 and CI=0.06-0.83) had lesser odds for both primary and secondary composite outcomes. Ketamine nonanesthetic bolus, ondansetron IV use, and in-hospital enoxaparin use had paradoxical lesser primary but greater odds for secondary composite outcomes. Prehospital oral laxative use (OR=0.61 and CI=0.18-1.04) and postoperative dual IV antibiotics (OR=0.52 and CI=0.10-0.94) had lesser odds for primary, but not secondary, outcome. To improve the odds for positive composite outcomes, oral iron and antibiotics, sugammadex and neostigmine, lower MME, and early IV fluid cessation could be considered essential core items, whereas postoperative dual IV antibiotics and epidural anesthesia might be avoided. Additional research needs to clarify the impacts of in-hospital enoxaparin, ketamine nonanesthetic bolus, and ondansetron use on composite patient outcomes.

Insights from an online survey: Veterinary surgeons' antibiotic practices in ophthalmic surgery in Germany.

To investigate antibiotic usage practices in ophthalmic surgeries in Germany. An online questionnaire was sent to veterinary surgeons (general veterinarians and veterinarians with additional qualification in ophthalmology) inquiring about their antibiotic preferences, administration methods, and factors affecting antibiotic usage in ophthalmic surgical procedures. A total of 417 questionnaires were analyzed. Postoperative antibiotics (systemic/topical in percent when used) were used all or most of the time by 69% of veterinarians following enucleation (99/6), by 62% after eyelid surgery (54/69), by 68% after third eyelid (TEL) surgery (19/92) and by 80% after keratectomy (6/99). The most commonly used systemic antibiotic was amoxicillin with clavulanic acid and the most commonly used topical antibiotic was chloramphenicol. WHO "watch-group" antibiotics were infrequently administered systemically but frequently utilized topically; including in 13% of eyelid surgery, 15% of TEL surgery, and 35% of keratectomies. Factors influencing antibiotic use included fear of complications (67%), personal experience (63%), diagnostic uncertainty (21%), and owner expectations (9%). Participants following institutional guidelines used fewer antibiotics in enucleations (p = .002) and were less likely to choose fluoroquinolones post-eyelid surgery (p = .044). The potential for reducing antibiotic use following ophthalmic soft tissue surgery is significant. Addressing barriers such as concerns about postoperative complications and the reliance on individual clinical experience, the implementation of standardized guidelines could facilitate a shift toward more judicious antibiotic practices.

The clinical management and efficacy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in patients with pyogenic spinal infection: a single-center cohort study

ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the clinical management and effectiveness of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in patients with pyogenic spinal infections.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of 17 patients diagnosed with pyogenic spinal infections and treated at our institution between October 2022 and February 2024. The cohort included 8 males and 9 females, with a mean age of 63.59 ± 10.18 years (range: 41–71 years). The infections comprised 9 epidural abscesses, 6 intervertebral space infections, and 2 deep abscesses. All patients underwent open surgical procedures and mNGS-based bacterial identification using intraoperative pus or tissue specimens, in addition to conventional blood bacterial cultures. Clinical outcomes were assessed using CRP, PCT, WBC inflammatory markers, and VAS scores postoperatively.ResultsAll 17 patients with pyogenic spinal infections underwent open surgery and mNGS bacterial detection at our institution. Among the 17 patients, mNGS yielded positive results in 14 cases (82.4%), significantly higher than the 5.9% positivity rate of conventional bacterial cultures (p < 0.001). The mNGS test time was notably shorter than conventional cultures (1.0 vs. 5.88 days, p < 0.001). Postoperative antibiotic therapy was adjusted based on mNGS findings. There were significant reductions in postoperative VAS, WBC, PCT, and CRP values compared to preoperative levels (p < 0.01).ConclusionMetagenomic next-generation sequencing is effective in managing pyogenic spinal infections by facilitating rapid and sensitive detection of pathogens. This technique improves the timeliness and accuracy of diagnosis, highlighting its potential for broader clinical use.

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Nomogram for Prediction of Unplanned Reoperation Postspinal Surgery Within 30 Days

Unplanned reoperation post-spinal surgery (URPS) leads to prolonged hospital stays, higher costs, decreased patient satisfaction, and adversely affects postoperative rehabilitation. This study aimed to develop and validate prediction models (nomograms) for early URPS risk factors using machine learning (ML) methods, aiding spine surgeons in designing prevention strategies, promoting early recovery, reducing complications and improving patient satisfaction. Medical records of 639 patients who underwent reoperation post-spinal surgery (RPS) from the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University (2018 - 2022) were collected, including baseline indicators, perioperative indicators, and laboratory indicators. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 122 URPS and 155 non-URPS patients were identified and randomly divided into training (82 URPS, 111 non-URPS) and validation (40 URPS, 44 non-URPS) cohorts. Three ML methods (LASSO regression, Random Forest, and SVM-RFE) were used to select feature variables, and their intersection was used to develop the prediction model, tested on the validation cohort. Six factors-implant, postoperative suction drainage (PSD), gelatin sponge (GS), anticoagulants (ATG), antibiotics (ATB), and disease type (DT)-were identified to construct a nomogram diagnostic model. The area under the curve (AUC) of this nomogram was 0.829 (95% CI 0.771-0.886) in the training cohort and 0.854 (95% CI 0.775-0.933) in the validation cohort. Calibration curves demonstrated satisfactory agreement between predictions and actual probabilities. The decision curve indicated clinical usefulness with a threshold between 1% and 90%. The established model can effectively predict URPS in patients and can assist spine surgeons in devising personalized and rational clinical prevention strategies.

Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: Tunisian Experience.

The purpose of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for pediatric acute appendicitis in order to guide its future management. We conducted a retrospective study including all children under the age of 14 years, who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis, during a period of 6 years (2013-2018). We divided our patients in two groups based on the surgical modality: the laparoscopic and open group. P values of less than .05 were considered statistically significant. A total of 690 appendectomies were identified: 151 (22%) were performed laparoscopically and 539 (78%) via laparotomy. The demographic data were comparable between the 2 groups. There was no statistical difference regarding the age, sex. However the frequency of obese patients was higher in laparoscopic approach (P < .001).The mean operative time was significantly longer in the Laparoscopic group (77 ± 39, 6 minutes) compared with Open group (57 ± 27 minutes) (P < .001). Prophylactic drain placement was significantly more common in the open appendectomy group (P = .034). Patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy experienced a quicker recovery to apyrexia, reduced use of postoperative analgesics, and postoperative antibiotic compared to those undergoing open appendectomy (P < .05). The mean length of hospital stay was respectively 4 ± 1 day in LA group and 4 ± 2 days in the OA group. No significant difference was observed. The results showed no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the incidence of wound infection, intra abdominal abscess, intestinal obstruction and umbilical hernia (P > .05).There was no death in this study. Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and feasible for the management of appendicitis without significant influence on the complications rate.

Outcome differences of emergency cesarean delivery in the delivery room versus the operating room: A study based on propensity score matching.

This study sought to compare the risks and outcomes associated with category I cesarean section procedures performed in the delivery room versus those performed in the operating room. The analysis included 126 singleton pregnant women who underwent inpatient delivery at the Second People's Hospital of Nanning between January 2021 and May 2024. Following propensity score matching, 21 cases were in the delivery room group, and 105 cases were in the operating room group. Parameters under investigation encompassed decision-to-delivery interval, incision-to-delivery interval, surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative antibiotic duration, postoperative hospital stay length, postoperative fever incidence, adverse neonatal outcomes, and blood routine parameters. The decision-to-delivery interval was significantly shorter in the delivery room group than in the operating room group. Conversely, the delivery room group exhibited longer surgical durations, higher blood loss, prolonged postoperative antibiotic usage, extended hospital stays, and elevated white blood cell counts with statistical significance (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, no notable variations were observed between the groups in maternal and neonatal outcome indicators, such as adverse neonatal outcomes and postoperative fever rates. The outcomes suggest that the delivery room group showed increased risks compared with the operating room group, potentially indicating heightened vulnerabilities to bleeding and infection. Hence, it is advisable for patients to undergo surgery in the operating room unless the delivery room is equipped with sterile surgical facilities or in cases of urgent necessity.

An institutional protocol including socket alveoplasty and primary closure following dental extractions for patients with an elevated risk of developing medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.

Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of alveoplasty and primary closure following dental extractions in patients with an elevated medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) risk.Study design A retrospective review of 46 patients with an elevated MRONJ risk was conducted. This included a total of 124 teeth extracted, due to unrestorable caries (n = 46; 37%) and peri-apical pathology (n = 44; 35%).Results Our results showed 0% (n = 0) of patients in our cohort developed MRONJ post-operatively. Most patients were being treated with intravenous zoledronic acid for breast cancer (n = 23; 50%), with an average of 15 doses (range 1-72).Conclusions This study supports the use of alveoplasty and primary closure for patients with an elevated MRONJ risk. The authors highlight the importance of pre-operative cone beam computed tomography imaging, optimisation of immune status, post-operative prophylactic antibiotics, and the delay of bone modifying agents recommencement as influential factors in mitigating risk and favouring successful outcomes.

Qualitative drivers of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics use and resistance in Ethiopia.

The World Health Organization (WHO) cautions against unnecessary prolongation of postoperative antibiotics to prevent surgical site infections (SSI), however this practice is still common in many countries. This study aims to describe drivers of prolonged postoperative antibiotic prescribing and clinicians' perspectives on antibiotics resistance and stewardship in Ethiopia. We conducted semi-structured interviews of 16 surgeons and nine surgical ward nurses at three academic referral hospitals in Addis Ababa. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and coded. Codes were inductively and iteratively derived between two researchers, tested for inter-rater reliability (IRR), and the codebook was consistently applied to all transcripts. Thematic analysis was performed to understand drivers of prolonged prophylactic antibiotic use in surgical patients. Interviews revealed factors contributing to postoperative prophylactic antibiotics overprescribing, including inadequate infection prevention and control (IPC) practices, wide variability in local prescribing practices, and distrust in the applicability of WHO guidelines. Antimicrobial resistance was also identified as a major concern by staff. Barriers to improving stewardship included a lack of multidisciplinary teamwork to inform prescribing decisions, while solutions included constructing appropriate context-specific guidelines and improving evidence-based practices through input from local stakeholders, including surgeons, clinical pharmacists, and nurses. Study participants perceived that existing evidence and guidelines did not apply in their settings due to high rates of surgical site infections and gaps in perioperative IPC practices (e.g., availability of water for handwashing, sterility breaches). These gaps were a key contributor to prophylactic antibiotic overprescribing, reinforcing the need to strengthen upstream and perioperative surgical antisepsis processes. The findings of this study underscore the importance of engaging multidisciplinary teams in strengthening antimicrobial stewardship efforts, aligning processes to achieve compliance with best practices, and the need for rigorous, contextually appropriate studies from these settings to inform policy.

Evaluating a virtual facilitation workshop with antimicrobial stewardship teams within a cluster randomized stepped-wedge trial

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) often function naturally as facilitators within clinical hospital settings, by working with individuals and teams to reduce unnecessary antibiotics. Within implementation science, facilitation has been studied and evaluated as an implementation strategy that can accelerate and improve fidelity to implementation efforts. This study describes a novel, virtual facilitation strategy developed and served as an intervention within the optimizing perioperative antibiotics for children trial (OPERATIC trial). This paper: (1) describes ASP team’s preferences for and use of a facilitation workshop and (2) describes sustained use of facilitation skills throughout the study period.MethodsStudy participants included antimicrobial stewardship team members from the nine children’s hospitals that participated in this study and completed facilitation training. All individuals who completed facilitation training were asked to evaluate the training through an online survey. Additionally, site leads were interviewed by the site coordinator every other month and asked about their team’s use of facilitation skills throughout the rest of the study period. Survey data were managed and coded in R, and qualitative interview data were analyzed using rapid methodology.Results30 individuals, including both physicians and pharmacists, completed the evaluation. Individuals largely rated themselves as novice facilitators (53%). Individuals reported satisfaction with virtual facilitation and identified different components of the workshops as valuable. An additional 108 interviews were performed throughout the study period. These interviews found that facilitators reported using all skills throughout the study period and described varied use of skills over time. All nine sites applied facilitation strategies, team building techniques, and communication/conflict skills at some point during the intervention phase.ConclusionWe describe the use of virtual facilitation as an acceptable and appropriate strategy to enhance facilitation skills for ASP teams working to reduce unnecessary postoperative antibiotics. Participants reported different useful components of facilitation training and described using differing facilitation skills throughout the trial. Overall, the use of facilitation skills continued throughout the duration of the study period. This paper outlines how facilitation training can be conducted virtually in a way that is feasible and acceptable to clinicians.Trial registrationNCT04366440, April 24, 2020.

Can "LITE" Procedure Combined With a Short Course Antibiotic Treatment Be Effective in Treating the Chronic PJI?-A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

The prevailing treatment for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a two-stage exchange, yet the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy following this procedure remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to determine whether a short course of postoperative antibiotic therapy can maintain infection control rates following a long interval two-stage exchange (LITE) for PJI. We conducted a prospective study enrolling patients with chronic PJI who underwent the LITE procedure at our institution from April 2018 to November 2021. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a long course (12 weeks) or short course (2 weeks) of postoperative antibiotics. The pathogens, antibiotics, inflammatory markers, antibiotic-related complications, cases of reinfection, or re-operation were recorded. Continuous variables were analyzed using the two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact tests. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare infection control rates. A total of 60 patients with chronic PJI who completed the LITE procedure were included in the study (30 patients per group). All patients were followed for a minimum of 24 months (mean 39.2 ± 13.0 months). We observed that the infection control rate in the short-course group was not inferior to that in the long-course group (96.7% vs. 96.7%, p = 1.000). For patients with chronic PJI undergoing the LITE procedure, a 2-week course of postoperative antibiotics suffices to maintain infection control rates. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1900027089.

Prevalence of unexpected intraoperative cultures (UPIC) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Prevalence of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPIC) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is reported to be 8.32% with largely varying findings in individual studies (5.92-62.07%) due to a heterogeneity in preoperative diagnostic work-up and diagnostic criteria for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). When diagnosed as unsuspected PJI, re-revision rate is reported to be as high as 18.45% compared to 2.94% in patients with UPIC classified as contamination (p = 0.0237). We performed a monocentric retrospective analysis of revision TKA surgery to determine prevalence of UPIC, risk of developing a subsequent PJI and re-revision rate after 24 months compared to those without UPIC. All presumed aseptic total knee revision procedures from 2008 until 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Single stage femorotibial revisions of TKA with at least 3 intraoperative cultures and a minimum follow-up of 24 months were included, whereas partial revisions or revisions from unicompartimental knee prosthesis to TKA were excluded. Demographic data were collected as well as initial reason for revision, preoperative aspiration results, micro-organism identified and postoperative antibiotics' administration. Primary outcome was survival rate after 24 months with differentiation based on UPIC interpretation: sterile, contamination, unsuspected PJI. Of 256 included cases, 75 (29.3%) were found to have at least 1 UPIC during revision surgery, 72% of whom a single UPIC was found. Thirty-four cases (13.28%) were interpreted as unsuspected PJI and therefore treated with antibiotics. In total, 13 of the 256 patients (5.08%) had to be re-revised during follow-up with 7 PJI (2.73%), none of them developing reinfection defined as PJI with the same microorganism. A statistically significant trend towards earlier failure in the unsuspected PJI group compared to the contaminant group was not observed. However, a higher incidence of re-revisions attributed to septic reasons was noted in the former group. Presence of UPIC in presumed aseptic revision TKA does not correlate with a lower survival rate, but a higher incidence of subsequent PJI was observed in cases interpreted as unsuspected PJI.

Exeporfinium chloride (XF-73) nasal gel significantly reduces Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in cardiac surgery patients throughout surgery and the early recovery period: results from a randomized placebo-controlled Phase 2 study.

Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriers were randomized (1:1) to XF-73 or placebo nasal gel, administered 5x over ∼24hrs pre-cardiac surgery. S. aureus burden rapidly decreased after 2 doses (-2.2log10 CFU/mL; placebo -0.01log10 CFU/mL) and was maintained to 6 days post-surgery. Among XF-73 patients, 46.5% received post-operative anti-staphylococcal antibiotics versus 70% in placebo (P = 0.045).

Postoperative Antibiotics May Be Unnecessary in Pediatric Patients Hospitalized With Minor Odontogenic Infections

BackgroundAntibiotic overuse is a growing concern in healthcare. For pediatric odontogenic infections, the necessity of post-operative antibiotics lacks clear, evidence-based guidelines. PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare treatment outcomes between pediatric patients hospitalized with vestibular space odontogenic infections who received post-operative antibiotics and those who did not. Study design, setting, sampleThis ambispective cohort study was conducted at the Baruch Padeh "Tzafon" Medical Center, Poriya, Israel (January 2010-December 2015 for retrospective and November 2018-December 2019 for prospective). The sample included 522 pediatric patients (<15 years) hospitalized for odontogenic infections requiring surgical intervention. Patients with non-odontogenic infections, compromised immune systems, or infections involving deeper spaces were excluded. Predictor/independent variableThe primary predictor was post-operative antibiotic management (administration vs. no administration), decided at hospital admission. Main outcome variable(s)The primary outcome variable was length of hospital stay (LOS), categorized as short (1-2 days) or extended (≥3 days). LOS was chosen as a proxy for recovery time and symptom resolution, reflecting the overall efficacy of the treatment approach. Covariates: Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected. AnalysesDescriptive statistics, Student t-tests, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression were used (P < .05). ResultsOf 522 patients (411 control, 111 study), mean LOS was similar between groups: 1.7 ± 0.91 days (control) vs 1.67 ± 0.9 days (study) (P = .76). Short stays were not significantly different (90.99% vs 87.10%, P = .32). Multivariable analysis showed no association between withholding antibiotics and extended stay (OR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.45-1.89, P = 0.82), but identified age (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02-1.21, P = 0.02) and initial WBC count (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.01-1.15, P = 0.03) as predictors of extended stay. Conclusions and RelevanceWithholding routine post-operative antibiotics in pediatric patients with odontogenic infections does not significantly impact length of hospital stay. While length of stay is not a direct measure of clinical outcome, it serves as a proxy for recovery. This approach may contribute to antibiotic stewardship efforts without compromising patient care, though future studies with direct clinical outcome measures are needed to confirm these findings.

Risk factors for fracture-related infections after low-velocity gunshot fractures to the pelvis

BackgroundAlthough treatments have improved dramatically in recent years, mortality following gunshot wounds (GSW) to the pelvis continue to range between 3 and 20 %. This project was designed to determine the incidence and risk factors associated with pelvic fracture-related infection (FRI) following GSWs to the pelvis given the paucity of evidence regarding this complication. MethodsA retrospective review of 13 years (1/2010–12/2022) of patients with GSW to the pelvis was performed. Patients meeting inclusion criteria underwent chart review for the development of pelvic FRI and the following additional data elements were extracted: demographics, presence and type of bowel injury, operations performed, complications, use of postoperative antibiotics (≤24 h vs. >24 h), surgical osseous debridement, presence of retained bullet fragments, and bullet trajectory. Discrete variables were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum test, chi-square, and Fischer's exact test. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for continuous variables. Results242 patients were included in the study. Concomitant bowel injury was present in 108 patients (45 %). Eleven patients (4.5 %) developed FRI, all of whom had a concomitant bowel injury (p < 0.001). Neither the presence of retained bullet fragments nor the bullet trajectory (through bowel before the bone) was associated with FRI. Antibiotic duration >24 h was not associated with a lower rate of pelvic FRI. ConclusionDevelopment of FRI after a GSW to the pelvis occurs in 4.5 % of patients and is significantly associated with concomitant bowel injury, specifically colonic injury. These findings can be used to help guide further studies on the role of prophylactic antibiotics or other strategies to prevent pelvic FRI.

Surgical practices in emergency umbilical hernia repair and implications for trial design

IntroductionThere is variation in the investigation, management, and surgical technique of acutely symptomatic umbilical hernias and optimal strategies remain to be established. This survey aimed to identify key variables influencing decision-making and preferred surgical techniques in emergency umbilical hernia care to help inform trial design and understand potential challenges to trial delivery.MethodsA survey was distributed to surgeons through social media, personal contacts, and ASGBI lists. It comprised five sections: (i) performer of repair, (ii) repair preferences, (iii) important outcomes, (iv) perioperative antibiotic use, and (v) potential future trial design.ResultsThere were 105 respondents, of which 49 (46.6%) were consultants. The median largest defect surgeons would attempt to repair with sutures alone was 2 cm (IQR 2–4 cm). In the acute setting, the most common mesh preferences are preperitoneal plane placement (n = 61, 58.1%), with synthetic non-absorbable mesh (n = 72, 68.6%), in clean (n = 41, 39.0%) or clean-contaminated (n = 52, 49.5%) wounds. Respondents believed suture repair to be associated with better short-term outcomes, and mesh repair with better long-term outcomes. Pre-/intra-operative antibiotics were very frequently given (n = 48, 45.7%) whilst post-operative antibiotics were rarely (n = 41, 39%) or very rarely (n = 28, 26.7%) given. The trial design felt to most likely influence practice is comparing mesh and suture repair, and post-operative antibiotics versus no post-operative antibiotics. Respondents indicated that to change their practice, the median difference in surgical site infection rate and recurrence rate would both need to be 5%.ConclusionThis survey provides insight into surgical preferences in emergency umbilical hernia management, offering guidance for the design of future trials.

Improving treatment plan and mental health in children with abdominal infection for broad-spectrum bacterial infections

BACKGROUND Pediatric abdominal infection is a common but serious disease that requires timely and effective treatment. In surgical treatment, accurate diagnosis and rational application of antibiotics are the keys to improving treatment effects. AIM To investigate the effect of broad-spectrum bacterial detection on postoperative antibiotic therapy. METHODS A total of 100 children with abdominal infection who received surgical treatment in our hospital from September 2020 to July 2021 were grouped. The observation group collected blood samples upon admission and sent them for broad-spectrum bacterial infection nucleic acid testing, and collected pus or exudate during the operation for bacterial culture and drug sensitivity testing; the control group only sent bacterial culture and drug sensitivity testing during the operation. RESULTS White blood cell count, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, 3 days after surgery, showed better postoperative index than the control group (P &lt; 0.05). The hospital stay in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group. The hospitalization cost in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P &lt; 0.05). CONCLUSION Early detection of broad-spectrum bacterial infection nucleic acids in pediatric abdominal infections can help identify pathogens sooner and guide the appropriate use of antibiotics, improving treatment outcomes and reducing medical costs to some extent.

Modified Cranial Closing Wedge Osteotomy (AMA-Based CCWO) to Treat Cranial Cruciate Ligament Deficient Stifle in 204 Dogs Over 50 Kg: Magnitude of the Craniocaudal Angulation of the Proximal Tibia and Rate of Surgical Site Infection.

The aim of this retrospective study was to report the magnitude of the craniocaudal angulation of the proximal tibia (CCAPT) quantified by the angle between the anatomical axis (AA) and the mechanical axis (MA), called the AMA angle, and the tibial plateau angle (TPA) in dogs >50 kg that were treated by cranial closing wedge osteotomy based on the AMA angle (AMA-based CCWO). Furthermore, the percentage of dogs in which the AA and MA could be aligned postoperatively and the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) were reported. Medical records (between January 2016 and September 2023) were reviewed for 204 dogs that had AMA-based CCWO stabilized with a double locking plate (DLP) fixation with or without joint exploration plus a Robert Jones bandage (RJB) and were given postoperative antibiotics. The median (range) preoperative AMA angle and TPA were 3.1° (0-5.1°) and 30° (22-49.6°), respectively, and the postoperative AMA angle and TPA were 0° (-2.4 to 1.6°) and 9.2° (4-15°), respectively. The AA and MA were aligned in 82% of dogs. Grade 4 healing occurred in all osteotomies by 8 weeks postoperatively. Except for one dog, no SSIs were recorded. Concerning the magnitude of CCAPT in dogs >50 kg and the low SSI rate, AMA-based CCWO stabilized with a DLP fixation plus an RJB and postoperative antibiotics should be considered for treating cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifles in this subset of dogs.

SP1.3 - Surgical Practices in Emergency Umbilical Hernia Repair and Implications for Trial Design

Abstract Aims There is variation in the investigation, management, and surgical technique of acutely symptomatic abdominal wall hernias and optimal strategies remain to be established. This survey aimed to identify key variables influencing decision-making and preferred surgical techniques in emergency umbilical hernia care to help inform trial design and understand potential challenges to trial delivery. Methods A survey was distributed to surgeons through social media, personal contacts, and ASGBI lists. It comprised five sections: (i) performer of repair, (ii) repair preferences, (iii) important outcomes, (iv) antibiotic use, and (v) trial design. Results There were 105 respondents, of which 49 (46.6%) were consultants. The median largest defect surgeons would attempt to repair with sutures alone was 2cm (IQR 2-4cm). In the acute setting, the most common mesh preferences are preperitoneal plane placement (n=61, 58.1%), with synthetic non-absorbable mesh (n=72, 68.6%), in clean (n=41, 39.0%) or clean-contaminated (n=52, 49.5%) wounds. Respondents believed suture repair to be associated with better short-term outcomes, and mesh repair with better long-term outcomes. The trial design felt to most likely influence practice is comparing mesh and suture repair, and also comparing post-operative antibiotics versus no post-operative antibiotics. Respondents indicated that to change their practice, the median difference in surgical site infection rate and recurrence rate would both need to be 5%. Conclusion This survey provides insight into surgical preferences in emergency umbilical hernia management, offering guidance for future trial designs. Such designs should align with existing evidence and incorporate patient and public involvement to ensure a meaningful impact.

A Survey of Preoperative, Perioperative, and Postoperative Management Practices for Testicular Torsion in Pediatric Patients among European Surgeons.

Management of testicular torsion varies between specialties resulting in lack of standardization. The aim of this survey was to assess pre-, peri-, and postoperative differences. An online questionnaire was distributed in 2023 to general and pediatric surgeons, pediatric urologists, and urologists by the Trainees of European Pediatric Surgery. Among 88 respondents (92% tertiary referral hospital), 38% always or usually perform sonography in case of suspected torsion respectively. In addition, 15% always attempt manual detorsion and 44% depending on the clinical presentation. Most surgeons (93%) favor a scrotal approach. Interestingly, pediatric surgeons choose a transscrotal while other specialties opt for a midline incision (p = 0.002). The majority (57%) employ a three-point fixation, while 42% opt for a two-point fixation. In case of necrotic testis, 61% puncture the testis with 52% opting for surgical removal, while 33% perform orchiectomy and 6% leave it in situ. Regarding necrotic or borderline-appearing testis, 54% take a biopsy. Furthermore, 82% perform prophylactic orchidopexy of the contralateral side during the same session. Postoperative antibiotics are always administered by 12%, while 52% do so sometimes. Most perform sonographic (58%) or clinical (57%) follow-up 3 months postoperatively. Notably, pediatric surgeons and urologists perform follow-up more frequently themselves, while general surgeons/urologists recommend follow-up by pediatricians (p = 0.002). In addition, 76% of responders affirm adhering to European Association of Urology guidelines. Unawareness of guidelines and institutional practices are reasons most commonly cited for nonadherence. Our study reveals significant disparities in the pre-, peri-, and postoperative management of testicular torsion underscoring the need for establishing standardized practices.

EP427 - Are we following the RCS England Guidelines for documentation of the operation note for a laparoscopic appendicectomy: A complete audit loop

Abstract Introduction The audit outlines the importance of adhering to RCS England Guidelines for documenting laparoscopic appendicectomies. Following these guidelines ensures standardized documentation, facilitating effective communication and promoting patient safety. Moreover, it underscores the significance of recording key procedural steps and techniques employed during the operation. It highlights the guidelines' emphasis on legible, timely, and complete documentation, emphasizing the role of the operation note as a legal document. Method This audit involved collecting data from September 2022 - August 2023 for the first loop to analyse operative notes of 92 laparoscopic appendicectomy cases. For the second loop, after introducing an electronic procedure-specific checklist as a guide, we reviewed 30 notes prospectively over a 2-month period (November-December 2023). The notes were compared against RCS England ‘Good Surgical Practice’ 2014 Guidelines using 18 parameters. We assessed for compliance with the guidelines and the legibility of notes. Results After introduction of a checklist, average compliance with guidelines increased significantly in 9 of the 18 parameters assessed, 6 remained unchanged at almost 100% compliance. Two key areas for emphasis were identified: instructions for post-op antibiotics (83%), DVT prophylaxis (53%). The most noticeable lack of documentation was in the gynaecological findings of females, recorded in only 13% of cases. There has been a noticeable effort in improving the legibility of the notes. Conclusion Introduction of a checklist increased compliance with guidelines. The comprehensive documentation will ultimately promote optimal patient outcomes and advance the overall quality of surgical care.