Posterolateral Approach Research Articles

Evolution of Thoracic Disc Herniation Surgery: Future Perspectives from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The neurosurgical treatment of thoracic disc herniation (TDH) has undergone dramatic changes over the years in terms of surgical approaches and intraoperative technological tools. There is still no unanimous consent on the criteria for approach selection, and the choice varies among Institutions. The aim of this study is to compare anterior and posterolateral approaches for TDH in terms of functional and surgical outcomes. Methods: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines from EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar online databases up to May 2024 incorporated studies that reported outcomes of thoracic disc herniation surgeries. Analyzed factors included major peri- and postoperative complications, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, neurological improvement, and complete hernia resection. Random-effect models were used to calculate pooled odds ratios and mean differences. Results: The posterolateral approach was associated with significantly lower rates of major medical (OR 0.14, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.27) and surgical complications (OR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.99) compared to the anterior approach. Additionally, posterolateral approaches reduced intraoperative blood loss and shorter hospital stays. Posterolateral techniques were linked to higher odds of neurological improvement (OR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.99) and higher rates of complete hernia resection (OR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.71). Conclusions: Posterolateral approaches offer advantages in terms of safety, recovery, neurological improvement, and complete hernia resection. More extensive prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and refine surgical strategies. Emerging technologies, such as the exoscope and 45° endoscopy, may further enhance surgical outcomes.

Endoscopic far-lateral supracerebellar infratentorial approach for resection of clival chordoma: case report

IntroductionThe surgery of clival chordoma remains one of the most formidable challenges for neurosurgeons because of its location at great depth in the cranium and proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Here, we describe the technique and feasibility of the purely endoscopic far-lateral supracerebellar infratentorial approach (EF-SCITA) for resection of an intradural clival chordoma.Case descriptionA 68-year-old women presented with sudden ptosis on the left side for two weeks. Imaging examinations revealed an upper-middle clival lesion that transgressed dural confines towards the posterior fossa, which was separated from the sphenoid cavity by an intact thin layer of membrane structure in front. For surgery, the EF-SCITA approach via suboccipital craniotomy was attempted for protecting surrounding neurovascular tissue and the membrane barrier under direct vision. The patients were placed in a “head-up” lateral park-bench position. With the endoscopic holder, endoscopic procedures were performed using standard two-hand microsurgical techniques by one surgeon. Tentorium incision allowed a working corridor toward the clival bulge through the crural cistern, without brain traction seen in traditional retrosigmoid approach. Efficient tumor debulking facilitated the exposure of surrounding critical structures, including ipsilateral CN III and superior cerebellar artery above, the brainstem and basilar artery posteriorly, as well as ipsilateral CN VI displaced laterally, and subsequent tumor separation from them. Step-wise tumor resection was performed within dural and bone confines. After significant tumor removal, the pituitary stalk could be visualized anteriorly, together with contralateral internal carotid artery and CN III. Postoperative MRI depicted gross total excision of the lesion. The patient on follow-up at one year had complete recovery of cranial nerve functions, without signs of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea.DiscussionThis technique combines advantages of the posterolateral approach and endoscopy, allowing access to the upper-middle clivus with seemingly low risks of postoperative morbidity. It would be a safe and effective alternative for resection of this rare entity.

Does the utilization of fluoroscopy affect the accuracy of prosthesis position in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery via the direct anterior approach compared to the posterolateral approach for an experienced surgeon? A single-center retrospective study

BackgroundThe direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has gained popularity due to perceived advantages in achieving better early outcomes. However, the theoretical benefits such as precise implant positioning and accurate leg length restoration are still inconsistent. In this study, we compared implant position and leg length discrepancy (LLD) of the DAA and posterolateral approach (PLA) conducted by a single surgeon who had mastered both approaches.MethodsThis study retrospectively reviewed the medical records and radiographic images of 244 patients who underwent THA between 2012 and 2021 by a single experienced surgeon using either the DAA (n = 120) or PLA (n = 124). Postoperative pelvic anteroposterior radiographs at 6 months follow-up were used to assess acetabular component inclination and anteversion, as well as LLD. Mann-Whitney U tests and Chi-squared test were performed to compare outcomes between the two approaches.ResultsNo significant differences were observed in patient demographics between the two groups. The DAA group demonstrated significantly lower postoperative LLD (0.00 mm) compared to the PLA group (5.00 mm, p < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed in the Lewinnek zone for cup anteversion and inclination angles between the two groups.ConclusionsFor experienced surgeons in other approaches, our findings suggest transferring to the DAA may not substantially improve cup positioning, but it might slightly enhance limb length measurement. For surgeons already proficient in other approaches and deciding to maintain those approaches, their primary concern for optimal THA outcome should be striving for leg length equivalence.

A rib-sparing unilateral transpedicular thoracic corpectomy using the ultrasonic bone scalpel: a novel technique and pictorial guide

BackgroundThe thoracic corpectomy is a well-described technique for the surgical treatment of vertebral column fractures with spinal canal compromise. Traditionally, the posterolateral approach to this procedure required the removal of the approach side rib in order to introduce the corpectomy cage. This rib removal, however, has been identified as a major contributor to post-operative morbidity. Rib-sparing techniques have been shown to be beneficial in minimizing post-operative morbidity in non-spinal surgeries. Herein, we present a previously undescribed technique of a rib-sparing thoracic corpectomy that avoids sequalae of rib resection with assistance from an ultrasonic bone scalpel (UBS).MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted on patients having undergone this thoracic corpectomy technique. Data on patient age at operation, indication for surgery, number of corpectomies per case, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time (OT), intra-operative complications, and post-operative length of stay (LOS) were collected and analyzed. A pictorial step-by-step guide was created to highlight the advantages of an entirely posterior rib-sparing unilateral transpedicular technique for thoracic corpectomy.ResultsA total of 36 corpectomies were performed on 32 patients between August 2015 and March 2023. Patients ages ranged from 17 to 85 years (mean = 63). The most common indication was oncological (n = 22, 69%), followed by degenerative/traumatic deformity (n = 7, 22%), and infection (n = 3, 9%). For the cases for which data was accessible, mean EBL was 853 cc and mean OT was 178 min. The average post-operative LOS was 6.5 days.ConclusionThe described surgical approach makes it possible to create a transpedicular corridor with no costectomy for implantation of an expandable titanium cage and anterior column reconstruction. The use of the UBS in this approach is critical as it minimizes bony removal and avoids sequelae of rib resection. The described technique has the potential to circumvent post-costectomy pain, thereby expediting post-operative recovery after thoracic corpectomy.

Differences in Time to Return to Work Between Patients Undergoing Staged Versus Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty

Patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) oftentimes have severe osteoarthritis (OA) in both hips and may consider staged or simultaneous bilateral THA (bTHA). The goal of this study was to compare the total workdays missed following staged and simultaneous bTHA performed via either postero-lateral or direct anterior approach. Patients who were (1) employed, (2) underwent a staged (within 12 months) or simultaneous bTHA at our institution between February 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021, (3) completed a return to work questionnaire, and (4) had the same surgical approach for both THAs were included. The primary outcome of interest was the total days of work missed. We identified 78 employed patients who had undergone staged bTHA (62 postero-lateral approach [PA], 16 direct anterior approach [DAA]) and 76 patients (44 PA, 32 DAA) who underwent simultaneous bTHA, and had completed the return to work questionnaire. Simultaneous bTHA patients missed an average of 25.6 days of work (standard deviation [SD]: 14.3 days) compared to staged bTHA patients, who missed an average of 36.9 days of work (SD: 23.4) when combining days missed from both operations (P < 0.001). In multivariate mixed regression analysis adjusted for sex, age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, type of work, and surgical approach, the staged bTHA group missed a mean of 8.2 more days of work (SD: 3.3) compared to the simultaneous bTHA group (95% confidence interval: 1.8-14.7, P = 0.013). Employed patients who underwent simultaneous bTHA missed an average of 8.2 fewer days of work compared to those who were treated with staged bTHA. These findings may help surgeons counsel their employed patients who have bilateral hip OA and are considering surgical treatment.

Surgical Treatment of Spinal Intra-Extradural Meningioma: A Clinical Case

Spinal meningiomas are rare, predominantly benign tumors that exhibit slow growth and typically have a non-invasive pattern of development. They originate from arachnoid cells and fibroblasts of the dura mater. Despite their benign nature, some meningiomas can exhibit intra-extradural extension, complicating both diagnosis and treatment. This article presents a clinical case involving a patient with an intra-extradural spinal meningioma. Despite radiological imaging suggesting a neurinoma, the final diagnosis confirmed a meningioma. Case Report: A female patient underwent surgical tumor resection through a posterolateral approach with laminectomy and facetectomy at the C4-C5 vertebral levels. The tumor, extending through the intervertebral foramen, was completely resected along with the affected nerve root. Histological examination verified a Grade II meningioma. Discussion: Despite advancements in neuroimaging and surgical techniques, intraoperative findings can be unpredictable, necessitating an adaptive approach to tumor resection. The article emphasizes the importance of adequate preoperative planning and the use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring to reduce the risk of complications and improve treatment outcomes. Conclusions: The primary treatment for spinal meningiomas is surgical. For dorsal and lateral localizations, total resection with the involved dura mater (Simpson Grade I) is optimal. For ventral localizations, tumor resection with coagulation of the dural attachment site (Simpson Grade II) is preferred. Preoperative and intraoperative use of electrophysiological methods is recommended to assess the functional status of neural structures. Intra-extradural localization of meningiomas is rare and presents significant challenges in preoperative diagnosis, requiring specific skills for effective removal.

&lt;i&gt;In vivo&lt;/i&gt; dynamic migration of the posterior interosseous nerve across various elbow and forearm positions

Background: The posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) is at risk of iatrogenic nerve injury during elbow surgery when using a lateral or posterolateral approach. Results of cadaveric studies indicated that maintaining forearm pronation throughout the surgery can help move the PIN away from the surgical window. However, in vivo dynamic migration of the PIN in response to changes in the elbow and forearm position is unclear. This study aimed to clarify the in vivo dynamic migration pattern of the PIN in response to changes in the elbow and forearm position using ultrasound imaging.Methods: This study included 43 upper extremities of 22 healthy volunteers (16 females; mean age, 29 years). Using ultrasound imaging, we measured the shortest distance from the radial head (RH) to the point where the PIN crossed the lateral aspect of the radial axis in six positions of the elbow and forearm: 90° forearm supination, 90° pronation, and neutral forearm position, each at 135° of elbow flexion and 0° of elbow extension. Results: The RH-to-nerve distance was greater during elbow extension than during elbow flexion regardless of the forearm position. However, the maximum migration distance was 3.5 mm when transitioning from elbow extension and forearm pronation (25.1 mm) to elbow flexion and forearm supination (21.6 mm).Conclusions: Although forearm pronation may help move the PIN away from the surgical window, care should be taken not to injure the nerve when performing elbow surgery using a lateral or posterolateral approach. Level of evidence: Level III.

Role of unilateral partial facet joint preservation in postero-lateral approach lumbar interbody fusion for patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis presenting bilateral lower limb symptoms: a retrospective study

BackgroundPosterolateral decompression and fusion with internal fixation is a commonly used surgical approach for treating degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). This study aims to evaluate the impact of preserving a portion of the unilateral facet joint during decompression on surgical outcomes and long-term recovery in patients.MethodsThis study analyzed 73 patients with DLSS accompanied by bilateral lower limb neurological symptoms who underwent single-level L4/5 posterolateral decompression and fusion surgery from January 2022 to March 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the type of surgery received: Group A comprised 31 patients who underwent neural decompression without facet joint preservation, while Group B consisted of 42 patients who underwent neural decompression with preservation of partial facet joints on one side. Regular follow-up evaluations were conducted, including clinical and radiological assessments immediately postoperatively, and at 3 and 12 months thereafter. Key patient information was documented through retrospective chart reviews.ResultsMost patients in both groups experienced favorable surgical outcomes. However, four cases encountered complications. Notably, during follow-up, Group B demonstrated superior 1-year postoperative interbody fusion outcomes (P < 0.05), along with a trend towards less interbody cage subsidence and slower postoperative intervertebral disc height loss. Additionally, Group B showed significantly reduced postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.05).ConclusionUnder strict adherence to surgical indications, the posterior lateral lumbar fusion surgery, which preserves partial facet joint unilaterally during neural decompression, can offer greater benefits to patients.

Impact of surgical approaches on stem position and hidden blood loss in total hip arthroplasty: minimally invasive vs. posterolateral

BackgroundThe surgical approach impacts the outcomes and recovery after total hip arthroplasty (THA), and approaches may affect the stem positioning. Contrary to the general concept of minimally invasive surgery, the direct anterior approach (DAA) results in more intraoperative blood loss. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare stem positioning and hidden blood loss (HBL) among three surgical approaches: the minimally invasive DAA, Orthopadische Chirurgie Munchen (OCM), and the traditional posterolateral approach (PLA).MethodsA total of 201 patients undergoing their first non-cemented THA using the DAA, OCM, and PLA were included in the study. General demographic data, stem alignment, and blood loss were evaluated. Specific comparison measurements included femoral neck anteversion, femoral stem anteversion, alignment of the stem in coronal and sagittal planes, proximal and distal medullary ratios, and femoral offset. Blood loss was measured by calculating Intraoperative Blood Loss ( IBL), visible blood loss (VBL), and hidden blood loss (HBL).ResultsThere were no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis, or femoral Dorr classification among the three groups. The mean surgical time was longer for the DAA and OCM compared to the PLA (P < 0.01). IBL was highest in the DAA group and lowest in the PLA (P < 0.05). Postoperative stem anteversion were significantly different among the groups, with the DAA showing the greatest anteversion difference (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the stem coronal alignment. However, there were more valgus and varus implants in the sagittal plane for the DAA and OCM. The femoral offset reduction was less optimal in the DAA and OCM groups (P < 0.05). The proximal and distal medullary ratios were lower in the DAA and OCM (P < 0.05). HBL was significantly lower in the DAA and OCM compared to the PLA (P < 0.05).ConclusionMinimally invasive approaches such as DAA and OCM offer advantages in muscle and soft tissue preservation, leading to reduced HBL compared to the conventional PLA. However, these approaches present challenges in femoral stem positioning and longer surgical times.

The anterior-based muscle-sparing approach is cost-effective when compared with posterolateral and direct anterior approaches for total hip arthroplasty

Purpose Research relating to Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) has found the anterior-based muscle-sparing (ABMS) approach improves both intraoperative and postoperative outcomes when compared to other THA approaches. This study compares the costs and outcomes of the ABMS and standard of care (SOC) to determine the relative cost-effectiveness. Methods A decision-analytic model was utilized to estimate intraoperative outcomes (i.e., length of procedure, length of stay (LOS), and transfusion rates) and 90-day postoperative complications (deep infection, periprosthetic fracture, and dislocation). Data relating to postoperative complications, intraoperative outcomes, and costs (adjusted to 2023 USD) were obtained from the literature. Model results were presented as incremental costs and complications avoided using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000. We conducted both one-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA), varying each parameter individually within a specific range, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) where parameters were varied simultaneously. In scenario analysis, ABMS was also compared to posterior approach (PA) and direct anterior approach (DAA) individually. Results ABMS THA was found to have superior results compared to SOC THA over a 90-day time horizon since it decreased major complications by 0.00186 per patient and cost by $3,851 per patient. The PSA found the ABMS dominates SOC and is cost-effective in approximately 98.29% and 100% of 10,000 iterations, respectively. Comparing ABMS with only PA procedures increased cost savings per patient to $4,766 while it decreased to $3,242 when comparing ABMS to only DAA procedures. Length of procedure, LOS, and discharge disposition were the main cost drivers. Conclusions This analysis demonstrates the ABMS approach for THA is a cost-effective technique when compared to PA and DAA, which may provide an opportunity for cost savings to the healthcare system.

Changes in rotator movement during early gait acquisition in after total hip arthroplasty

BackgroundIn walking in healthy adults, rotation of the hip joint affects stride length and shifts the center of gravity, but these are not seen in hip osteoarthritis which affects gait. In gait of total hip arthroplasty, there are few reports on changes in the horizontal plane. This study clarified the preoperative and early postoperative gait characteristics of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. MethodsThe analysis included 12 females who underwent initial total hip arthroplasty using a posterolateral approach. Gait was measured pre and postoperatively using a three-dimensional motion analysis device. Statistics were compared pre and postoperative range of motion, muscle strength, walking speed, stride length, gravity movement distance, trunk angle, hip joint angle, and joint moment. FindingsThe maximum hip abduction moment and trunk flexion angle to the surgical side were lower than in healthy subjects. The angle of internal rotation during the stance phase was significantly higher in the postoperative period. The distance of the center of gravity shift in the left and right directions was significantly decreased postoperatively. InterpretationGait disturbance was seen preoperatively and remained after surgery. Walking after total hip arthroplasty provides the hip joint rotates inward which is closer to normal walking. However, no change was observed in the external rotation moment of the hip joint during walking. We suspect that the invasiveness of the posterolateral approach of total hip arthroplasty affects the muscles for external rotation of the hip joint. This can also cause in gait disturbances.

Prone position fibula nail and tibia buttress plate for large Volkmann fracture-dislocations technical note and preliminary results on a short case series

Large posterolateral tibial fragments, known as Volkmann fractures, are common in ankle fracture-dislocations and typically require open reduction and fixation with interfragmentary screws and often buttress plates using a prone posterolateral approach. In this setting, fibula plating often necessitates dissection of the lateral window between the peroneal tendons and the skin, increasing wound-related complications. In recent years, intramedullary nailing of fibula fractures has gained popularity as a minimally invasive technique that allows load-sharing stabilization. However, this procedure has traditionally been performed in the supine position, which can pose challenges if a Volkmann-type fracture is present, requiring repositioning and losing access to the fibula through the posterolateral approach. Our objective is to describe a technique for fixing ankle fracture-dislocations with large posterolateral fragments using tibial buttress plates and fibula nails through a prone posterolateral approach without dissecting the lateral window. Additionally, we will present a case series with preliminary results.

Posterior Malleolus Fracture Fixation In Lateral Decubitus Position: Surgical Technique and Results in 60 Patients

The present study shows how posterior malleolus fractures (PMFs) and distal fibular fractures were fixed using the posterolateral approach with the patient in lateral decubitus position, not previously described in the literature. This technique has been used in 60 consecutive patients (42 women and 18 men; mean age 54.7; range 21-92 years), 33 of which presented as fracture dislocations from March, 2021 to December, 2023. After PMFs fixation in lateral decubitus position, release of the sacral support allowed patients to be placed supine (without de-sterilizing the operative field), in order to proceed with medial malleolus or posteromedial fragment fixation. Fractures were classified according to the Lauge Hansen classification as SER4 (n = 50), PER4 (n = 7), SAD (n = 1), and PAB (n = 2). Fractures were classified according to Rammelt & Bartonicek, as type B (n = 40), C (n = 13), and D (n = 7). During the same period of time 14 fractures involving the PM, classified as type A, were treated with indirect fixation, whilst 6 geriatric and/or poor mobility patients with fracture dislocations were treated with retrograde hindfoot nail fixation. Follow-up period ranged from 4-36 months (mean = 14.4; SD = 8.8). Complications occurred in 5 patients (8.3%; 3 had delayed (medial) wound healing, one developed CRPS and one required implants removal and arthroscopy because of metal irritation and stiffness). No deep infections, thromboembolic events, fracture malreductions or malunions were recorded and all patients returned to the preinjury mobilization status. In conclusion, PM fracture fixation was feasible and safely performed with patients in lateral decubitus position.

The temperature profile in elbow arthroscopy using radiofrequency ablation.

Over the last decades, arthroscopic surgery has become increasingly relevant as its minimally invasive approach offers many benefits. To investigate the risks of orthoscopic surgery at the elbow, this study aimed to investigate the development of temperatures in elbow joints while performing radiofrequency ablation in arthroscopic surgery. We performed standard arthroscopic surgeries with posterolateral, transtricipital and anterolateral approaches on seven cadaveric elbows and performed ablation on predefined locations with or without irrigation. Two temperature probes were positioned into the olecranon fossa and between the ulnar nerve and the medial joint capsule. The temperature data were recorded using a real-time data logger. A bipolar radiofrequency ablation (bRFA) device was used at the medial and lateral recess and in the fossa olecrani over a defined period. Data was then analyzed using Matlab. Using bRFA without irrigation results in rapidly increasing temperature within the joint. A significant temperature increase was found within only 5s without irrigation (p = 0.0052) in the fossa olecrani. We did not observe critical temperatures above 41°C close to the ulnar nerve within 30s under constant irrigation (p = 0.0747). Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can be safely used in elbow arthroscopy with irrigation. The continuous use without irrigation should be limited to 3s. Despite the anatomical proximity of the ulnar nerve and capsule, we were able to show that a possible rise in temperature most likely does not affect the ulnar nerve.

Safety of Posterolateral Approach in High-Risk Patients with Trimalleolar Fractures

Aim: Purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of posterolateral approach (PLA) and minimal-invasive percutaneous anteroposterior (AP) approach for the fixation of posterior malleolar fragment in patients who have risk factors for wound healing. Material and Methods: 66 patients were analyzed in 2 study groups. Group 1: PLA (29 patients), Group 2: AP (37 patients). Patient demographics, risk factors for wound healing, presence of syndesmotic injury, fracture type, postoperative wound-healing complications and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score (AOFAS) were recorded. Results: There was no difference between the study groups in regard to wound-healing problems. Obese and smokers had significantly more wound-healing problems regardless of the surgical approach. There was no statistically significant difference between the study groups in regard to AOFAS. Conclusion: In trimalleolar fractures, PLA can be safely considered even for the patients who have risk factors for wound-healing problems other than obesity and smoking.

Comparison of biportal endoscopic and microscopic tubular paraspinal approach for foraminal and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation.

Foraminal and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation (FELDH) is an important pathological condition that can lead to lumbar radiculopathy. The paraspinal muscle-splitting approach introduced by Reulen and Wiltse is a reasonable surgical technique. Minimally invasive procedures using a tubular retractor system have also been introduced. However, surgical treatment is considered more challenging for FELDH than for central or subarticular lumbar disc herniations (LDHs). Some researchers have proposed uniportal extraforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy through a posterolateral approach as an alternative for FELDH, but heterogeneous clinical results have been reported. Recently, the biportal endoscopic (BE) paraspinal approach has been suggested as an alternative. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of BE and microscopic tubular (MT) paraspinal approaches for decompressive foraminotomy and lumbar discectomy (paraLD) in patients with FELDH. Ninety-one consecutive patients with unilateral lumbar radiculopathy and FELDH underwent paraLD. Demographic and perioperative data were collected. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for spinal disability, and the modified Macnab criteria for patient satisfaction. Postoperative complications and reoperation rates were also evaluated. In total, 76 patients were included in the final analysis. Among them, 43 underwent BE paraLD (group A) and the remaining 33 underwent MT paraLD (group B). The demographic and preoperative data were not statistically different between the groups. All patients showed significant improvements in VAS back, VAS leg, and ODI scores compared with baseline values (p < 0.05). The improvement in VAS back scores was significantly better in group A than in group B on postoperative day 2 (p < 0.001). However, all clinical parameters were comparable between the two groups after postoperative year 1 (p > 0.05). According to the modified Macnab criteria, 86.1% and 72.7% of the patients had excellent or good outcomes in groups A and B, respectively. No intergroup differences were observed (p = 0.367). In addition, there were no differences in the total operation time or amount of surgical drainage. Postoperative complications were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.301); however, reoperation rates were significantly higher in group B (p = 0.035). BE paraLD is an effective treatment for FELDH and is an alternative to MT paraLD. In particular, BE paraLD has advantages of early improvement in postoperative back pain and low reoperation rates.

EE76 Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach (ABLE) Is Cost-Effective When Compared with Posterolateral and Direct Anterior Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasties

EE76 Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach (ABLE) Is Cost-Effective When Compared with Posterolateral and Direct Anterior Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasties

Posterolateral approaches to the thoracic spine for calcific disc herniation: is wider exposure always better?

To compare the costotransversectomy (CTV) and transpedicular (TP) approaches versus the transfacet (TF) approach for the surgical treatment of calcific thoracic spine herniations (cTDH), in terms of surgical and clinical outcomes. Surgical approaches for cTDH are debated. Anterior approaches are recommended, while posterolateral approaches are preferred for non-calcific, paramedian, and lateral hernias. Currently, there is limited evidence about the superiority of a more invasive surgical approach, such as CTV or TP, over TF, a relatively less invasive approach, in terms of neurological outcome, pain, and surgical complications, for the treatment of cTDH. A retrospective, observational, monocentric study was conducted on patients who underwent posterolateral thoracic approaches for symptomatic cTDH, between 2010 and 2023, at our institute. Three groups were drafted, based on the surgical approach used: TF, TP, and CTV. All procedures were assisted by intraoperative CT scan, spinal neuronavigation, and intraoperative neuromonitoring. Analyzed factors include duration of surgery, amount of bone removal, intraoperative blood loss, CSF leak, need of instrumentation for iatrogenic instability, degree of disc herniation removal, myelopathy recovery. Afterwards, a statistical analysis was performed to investigate the bony resection of the superior posterior edge of the vertebral soma. The primary outcome was the partial or total herniation removal. This study consecutively enrolled 65 patients who underwent posterolateral thoracic surgery for cTDH. The TF approach taking the least, and the CTV the longest time (p < 0.01). No statistical difference was observed between the three mentioned approaches, in terms of intraoperative blood loss, dural leakage, post-resection instrumentation, total herniation removal, or myelopathy recovery. An additional somatic bony resection was successful in achieving total herniation removal (p < 0.01), and the extent of bony resection was directly proportional to the extent of hernia removal (p < 0.01). No statistically significant differences were highlighted between the TP, TF, and CTV regarding the extent of cTDH removal, the postoperative complications, and the neurological improvement. The described somatic bone resection achieved significant total herniation removal and was directly proportional to the preop against postop anteroposterior diameter difference.

Exploring the clinical value of direct anterior approach THA for short-term hip function improvement: A single-center retrospective analysis of short-term outcomes.

To investigate the outcomes of the direct anterior approach (DAA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and its impact on improving hip joint function. This retrospective analysis included 94 patients who underwent THA between December 2017 and December 2020 at Dongguan Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine. The study group comprised 50 patients who received the DAA, while the control group comprised 44 patients who received the postero-lateral approach (PA). The follow-up period was 12 months. A comparison was made between the 2 groups based on perioperative indicators (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time, bed rest time, incision length, pain score), duration of walker use, incidence of postoperative complications, hip joint function (Harris score), quality of life (SF-36), and activities of daily living (ADL). The treatment effectiveness rate was higher in the study group (P < .05). The study group had a longer operation time, lower intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospitalization and bed rest time, smaller incision length, and lower visual analog scale (VAS) score after treatment, with statistically significant differences (P < .05). The study group also had a shorter duration of walker use after surgery (P < .05). The Harris score after treatment was higher in the study group compared to the control group (P < .05). Additionally, the study group had higher SF-36 scores and ADL scores after treatment (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the 2 groups (P > .05). The DAA in THA resulted in reduced pain and intraoperative blood loss, contributing to the promotion of postoperative recovery in patients with good short-term outcomes. This procedure warrants further promotion.

Surgical Approach Does Not Influence Instability Risk in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundAlthough the direct anterior (DA) approach has increased in popularity for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), there is limited evidence regarding its use for revision THA. It is unknown whether the dislocation benefit seen in the primary setting translates to revision cases. MethodsThis retrospective review compared the dislocation rates of revision THA performed through DA versus postero-lateral (PL) approaches at a single institution (2011 to 2021). Exclusion criteria included revision for instability, ≥ 2 prior revisions, approaches other than DA or PL, and placement of dual-mobility or constrained liners. There were 182 hips in 173 patients that met the inclusion criteria. The average follow-up was 6.5 years (range, 2 to 8 years). ResultsThere was a trend toward more both-component revisions being performed through the PL approach. There were no differences in dislocation rates between the DA revision and PL revision cohorts, which were 8.1% (5 of 72) and 7.5% (9 of 120), respectively (P = .999). Dislocation trended lower when the revision approach was discordant from the primary approach compared to cases where primary and revision had a concordant approach (4.9 versus 8.5%), but this was not statistically significant (P = .740). No significant differences were found in return to operating room, 90-day emergency department visits, or 90-day readmissions. However, the length of stay was significantly shorter in patients who had DA revisions after a primary PL procedure (P = .021). ConclusionsDislocation rates following revision THA did not differ between the DA and PL approaches irrespective of the primary approach. Surgeons should choose their revision approach based on their experience and the specific needs of the patient.