Posterior Subthalamic Area Deep Brain Stimulation Research Articles

Optimizing Deep Brain Stimulation in Essential Tremor: A Randomized Controlled Trial for Target Consideration.

The thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) is a well-established target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of essential tremor (ET). Increasing data indicate that the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) may be superior, but high-level evidence is limited. We aimed at further comparing the intraindividual efficacy and side effect profile of PSA vs VIM DBS in ET. In this randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, 4-contact DBS leads were bilaterally implanted with single-trajectory covering the VIM and PSA. Patients were randomized postsurgery to 2 groups, receiving VIM stimulation (4-7 months) and then PSA stimulation (8-11 months) or vice versa. The primary end point was the difference in improvement from baseline to the end of the VIM vs PSA DBS period in the total score of the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS). Ten patients with medically refractory ET were enrolled, and 9 completed the study. The difference between reduction of FTM-TRS total score in the PSA vs VIM DBS period was -7.4 (95% CI: -28.5 to 13.7, P = .328). Clinical benefit was achieved at significantly lower stimulation intensity under PSA DBS. Furthermore, PSA DBS provided greater improvement in head tremor subscore of FTM-TRS (PSA vs VIM: -2.2, P = .020) and disease-specific quality of life (PSA vs VIM: -13.8, P = .046) and induced fewer speech (Dysphonia Severity Index score: P = .043; diadochokinetic rate: P = .007; VDI score: P = .005) and gait disturbances compared with VIM DBS. Seven patients remained with PSA DBS after the crossover phase. Our study confirms that PSA-DBS is comparable with VIM-DBS in suppressing tremors, superior in improving disease-specific quality of life, and possibly more effective in reducing head tremor.

Technical Issues of Vim–PSA Double-Target DBS for Essential Tremor

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective surgical treatment for essential tremor (ET), with the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) and posterior subthalamic area (PSA) as the most common targets. The stimulation efficacy of ET with Vim-PSA double-target DBS has been reported. Herein, we aim to propose surgical techniques for Vim-PSA double-target DBS surgery. This study enrolled six patients with ET who underwent Vim-PSA double-target electrode implantation from October 2019 to May 2022. The targets were located and adjusted using coordinates and multimodality MRI images. A burr hole was accurately drilled in line with the electrode trajectory under the guidance of a stereotactic frame. Novel approaches were adopted during the electrode implantation process for pneumocephalus reduction, including "arachnoid piamater welding" and "water sealing". Electrophysiological recording was used to identify the implantation sites of the electrodes. A 3D reconstruction model of electrodes and nuclei was established to facilitate programming. The combination of coordinates and multimodality MRI images for target location and adjustment enabled the alignment of Vim and PSA. Postoperative CT scanning showed that the electrode was precisely implanted. Stereotactic guidance facilitated accurate burr hole drilling. "Arachnoid piamater welding" and "water sealing" were efficient in reducing pneumocephalus. Intraoperative electrophysiological verified the efficacy of Vim-PSA double-target DBS surgery. The methods for target location and adjustment, accurate drilling of the burr hole, reduction in pneumocephalus, and intraoperative electrophysiological verification are key issues in DBS surgery targeting both the Vim and PSA. This study may provide technical support for Vim-PSA DBS, especially for surgeons with less experience in functional neurosurgery.

Ventral Intermediate Nucleus of the Thalamus versus Posterior Subthalamic Area: Network Meta-Analysis of DBS Target Site Efficacy for Essential Tremor

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) of the thalamus or the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) are effective treatments for essential tremor (ET). However, their relative efficacy is unknown. Objective: Here, we present the first systematic review and network meta-analysis, examining the efficacy of Vim versus PSA DBS for treating medically refractory ET. Methods: We included all primary studies that reported validated Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) scores pre-/postimplantation or on-/off-stimulation postimplantation, for patients receiving either Vim or PSA DBS. The primary outcome was FTM-TRS score reduction; the secondary outcome was percent reduction in score. We categorized all outcomes as short-term (≤12 months) or long-term (>12 months). Results: For pre-/postimplantation comparisons, 19 and 11 studies met inclusion criteria for short- and long-term follow-ups, respectively. For on-/off-stimulation tremor score comparisons, 8 studies met inclusion criteria for short-term follow-up. Network meta-analysis of pre-/postimplantation tremor scores showed greater tremor reduction with PSA implantation short-term (absolute tremor reduction: PSA: −30.94 [95% confidence interval (CI): −34.93, −26.95]; Vim: −26.26 [95% CI: −33.39, −19.12]; relative tremor reduction: PSA: 63.3% [95% CI: 61.8%–64.8%]; Vim: 57.8% [95% CI: 56.5%–59.0%]). However, there was no difference in efficacy between PSA and Vim DBS when comparing tremor on-versus off-stimulation at short-term follow-up or pre- versus postimplantation tremor reduction long-term. Conclusion: Our systematic review highlighted both heterogeneity in scoring systems used and lack of transparency in reporting total scores, limiting direct comparison across studies. We found a modestly superior efficacy with PSA stimulation in the short term, but no difference in tremor reduction long-term.

Stimulation-Induced Side Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation in the Ventralis Intermedius and Posterior Subthalamic Area for Essential Tremor.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the ventralis intermedius (VIM) nucleus of the thalamus and the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) has been shown to be an effective treatment for essential tremor (ET). The aim of this study was to compare the stimulation-induced side effects of DBS targeting the VIM and PSA using a single electrode. Patients with medication-refractory ET who underwent DBS electrode implantation between July 2011 and October 2020 using a surgical technique that simultaneously targets the VIM and PSA with a single electrode were enrolled in this study. A total of 93 patients with ET who had 115 implanted DBS electrodes (71 unilateral and 22 bilateral) were enrolled. The Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) subscores improved from 20.0 preoperatively to 4.3 (78.5% reduction) at 6 months, 6.3 (68.5% reduction) at 1 year, and 6.5 (67.5% reduction) at 2 years postoperation. The best clinical effect was achieved in the PSA at significantly lower stimulation amplitudes. Gait disturbance and clumsiness in the leg was found in 13 patients (14.0%) upon stimulation of the PSA and in significantly few patients upon stimulation of the VIM (p = 0.0002). Fourteen patients (15.1%) experienced dysarthria when the VIM was stimulated; this number was significantly more than that with PSA stimulation (p = 0.0233). Transient paresthesia occurred in 13 patients (14.0%) after PSA stimulation and in six patients (6.5%) after VIM stimulation. Gait disturbance and dysarthria were significantly more prevalent in patients undergoing bilateral DBS than in those undergoing unilateral DBS (p = 0.00112 and p = 0.0011, respectively). Paresthesia resolved either after reducing the amplitude or switching to bipolar stimulation. However, to control gait disturbance and dysarthria, some loss of optimal tremor control was necessary at that particular electrode contact. In the present study, the most common stimulation-induced side effect associated with VIM DBS was dysarthria, while that associated with PSA DBS was gait disturbance. Significantly, more side effects were associated with bilateral DBS than with unilateral DBS. Therefore, changing active DBS contacts to simultaneous targeting of the VIM and PSA may be especially helpful for ameliorating stimulation-induced side effects.

PSA and VIM DBS efficiency in essential tremor depends on distance to the dentatorubrothalamic tract.

To investigate the relation between deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the posterior-subthalamic-area (PSA) and the ventral-intermediate-nucleus (VIM) and the distance to the dentatorubrothalamic tract (DRTT) in essential tremor (ET). Tremor rating scale (TRS) hemi-scores were analyzed in 13 ET patients, stimulated in both the VIM and the PSA in a randomized, crossover trial. Distances of PSA and VIM contacts to population-based DRTTs were calculated. The relationships between distance to DRTT and stimulation amplitude, as well as DBS efficiency (TRS improvement per amplitude) were investigated. PSA contacts were closer to the DRTT (p=0.019) and led to a greater improvement in TRS hemi-scores (p=0.005) than VIM contacts. Proximity to the DRTT was related to lower amplitudes (p<0.001) and higher DBS efficiency (p=0.017). Differences in tremor outcome and stimulation parameters between contacts in the PSA and the VIM can be explained by their different distance to the DRTT.

Posterior Subthalamic Area Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment of Refractory Holmes Tremor

Three right-handed patients diagnosed with Holmes tremor (HT), who suffered from pharmacotherapy-refractory tremor, were eligible for unilateral posterior subthalamic area deep brain stimulation (PSA-DBS). All patients were evaluated with the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTMTRS) and Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI) before DBS, 6, and 12 months after the PSA-DBS as well as at the last follow-up. In all patients, we observed a significant improvement of tremor control as demonstrated by changes in the FTMTRS and the CGI scales. Mean improvement of tremor in all patients was 56% for the FTMRTS with a corresponding change in the CGI scale. Our study demonstrates that PSA-DBS is efficacious in the treatment of HT. Indeed, PSA is a promising target for DBS for intractable proximal and distal tremor, even in cases of previous, suboptimal functional neurosurgery. The beneficial effect lasts over a long-term follow-up. PSA-DBS may be considered as an alternative target of DBS in tremor treatment.

Comparison of posterior subthalamic area deep brain stimulation for tremor using conventional landmarks versus directly targeting the dentatorubrothalamic tract with tractography

ObjectiveTo compare posterior subthalamic area deep brain stimulation (PSA-DBS) performed in the conventional manner against diffusion tensor imaging and tractography (DTIT)-guided lead implantation into the dentatorubrothalamic tract (DRTT). Patients and MethodsDouble-blind, randomised study involving 34 patients with either tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease or essential tremor. Patients were randomised to Group A (DBS leads inserted using conventional landmarks) or Group B (leads guided into the DRTT using DTIT). Tremor (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin) and quality-of-life (PDQ-39) scores were evaluated 0-, 6-, 12-, 36- and 60-months after surgery. ResultsPSA-DBS resulted in marked tremor reduction in both groups. However, Group B patients had significantly better arm tremor control (especially control of intention tremor), increased mobility and activities of daily living, reduced social stigma and need for social support as well as lower stimulation amplitudes and pulse widths compared to Group A patients. The better outcomes were sustained for up to 60-months from surgery. The active contacts of Group B patients were consistently closer to the centre of the DRTT than in Group A. Speech problems were more common in Group A patients. ConclusionDTIT-guided lead placement results in better and more stable tremor control and fewer adverse effects compared to lead placement in the conventional manner. This is because DTIT-guidance allows closer and more consistent placement of leads to the centre of the DRTT than conventional methods.

Comparing deep brain stimulation in the ventral intermediate nucleus versus the posterior subthalamic area in essential tremor patients.

Background:The ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) is the most commonly used target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in patients with essential tremor (ET). Recent evidence suggests that the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) might be a better target for tremor reduction. We compared the outcome of VIM DBS with PSA DBS in our cohort of patients.Methods:Overall, 19 ET patients with bilateral DBS were included in this retrospective study, with a total of 38 electrodes (12 located in the VIM, 12 in the PSA, and 14 in an intermediate area). The outcome was measured using the essential tremor rating scale (ETRS), the glass scale and the quality of life in essential tremor questionnaire (QUEST).Results:Unilateral tremor-scores with items 5–6 (tremor of the upper extremity), 8–9 (tremor of the lower extremity), and 11-14 (hand function) from the ETRS showed a 63% tremor reduction in the VIM group, 47% tremor reduction in the PSA group, and 67% tremor reduction in the intermediate group after a mean follow-up of 1.6 years. After a mean follow-up of 5.8 years, there was a tremor reduction of 50%, 34%, and 45%, respectively. In our series, side effects such as dysarthria (75%), ataxia and disequilibrium (40%), and paraesthesia (15%) were assessed.Conclusions:All aforementioned anatomical target areas are effective in reducing tremor, although no superior reduction was found with PSA stimulation. Because of intraindividual differences between left and right hemisphere regarding the stimulated anatomical target, no conclusions can be drawn regarding differences in side effects.

Current clinical application of deep-brain stimulation for essential tremor

BackgroundDeep-brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for medically refractory essential tremor (ET). This article reviews the current evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of DBS targets, including the ventral intermediate (VIM) nucleus and posterior subthalamic area (PSA) in treatment of ET.MethodsA structured PubMed search was performed through December 2012 with keywords “deep brain stimulation (DBS),” “essential tremor (ET),” “ventral intermediate (VIM) nucleus,” “posterior subthalamic area (PSA),” “safety,” and “efficacy.”ResultsBased on level IV evidence, both VIM and PSA DBS targets appear to be safe and efficacious in ET patients in tremor reduction and improving activities of daily living, though the literature on PSA DBS is limited in terms of bilateral stimulation and long-term follow-up. DBS-related adverse effects are typically mild and stimulation-related. Hardware-related complications after DBS may not be uncommon, and often require additional surgical procedures. Few studies assessed quality-of-life and cognition outcomes in ET patients undergoing DBS stimulation.ConclusionDBS appears to be a safe and effective treatment for medically refractory ET. More systematic studies comparing VIM and PSA targets are needed to ascertain the most safe and effective DBS treatment for medically refractory ET. More research is warranted to assess quality-of-life and cognition outcomes in ET patients undergoing DBS.

Post subthalamic area deep brain stimulation for tremors: a mini-review

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the thalamic ventrointermediate nucleus (VIM) is the traditional target for the surgical treatment of pharmacologically refractory essential tremor or parkinsonian tremor. Studies in recent years on DBS in posterior subthalamic area (PSA), including the zona incerta and the prelemniscal radiation, have shown promising results in tremor suppression, particularly for those tremors difficult to be well controlled by VIM DBS, such as the proximal postural tremor, distal intention tremor and some cerebellar outflow tremor in various diseases including essential tremor and multiple sclerosis. The adverse effect profile of the PSA DBS is mild and transient, without lasting or striking dysarthria, disequilibrium or tolerance, in contrast to VIM DBS, particularly bilateral DBS. However, the studies on PSA DBS so far are still limited, with a handful of studies on bilateral PSA, and a short follow up duration compared to VIM. More studies are needed for direct comparison of these targets in the future. A review here would help to gain more insight into the benefits and limits of the PSA DBS compared to that in VIM in the clinical management of various tremors, particularly for those difficult to be well controlled by traditional VIM DBS.

Influence of age, gender and severity of tremor on outcome after thalamic and subthalamic DBS for essential tremor

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for essential tremor (ET). The nucleus ventralis intermedius thalami (Vim) is the target of choice, but promising results have been presented regarding DBS in the posterior subthalamic area (PSA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible influence of gender, age and severity of disease on the outcome of these procedures.Sixty eight patients (34 Vim, 34 PSA) with ET were included in this non-randomised study. Evaluation using the Essential Tremor Rating Scale (ETRS) was performed before, and one year after surgery concerning PSA DBS, and at a mean of 28 ± 24 months concerning Vim DBS. Items 5/6 and 11–14 (hand tremor and hand function) were selected for analysis of tremor outcome.The efficacy of DBS on essential tremor was not related to age or gender. Nor was it associated with the severity of tremor when the percentual reduction of tremor on stimulation was taken into account. However, patients with a more severe tremor at baseline had a higher degree of residual tremor on stimulation. Tremor in the treated hand and hand function were improved with 70% in the Vim group and 89% in the PSA group.

Deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus in patients with essential tremor: Stimulation below intercommissural line is more efficient but equally effective as stimulation above

BackgroundThe posterior subthalamic area (PSA), ventral to the intercommissural line (ICL) and the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM), has been suggested as a promising target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in patients suffering from essential tremor (ET). In this study the clinical benefit of VIM and PSA DBS on postural tremor suppression was systematically evaluated in a two step approach with a 3D ultrasound kinematic analysis tool. MethodsWe defined the exact position of 40 VIM-DBS-electrodes from 21 ET patients. In a first experiment with a subgroup of electrodes we subsequently activated a thalamic and a contact below ICL (sub-ICL) with equal parameter settings for within subject comparison. In a second step, we divided all electrodes into two groups, i.e. one group with activated thalamic and the other group with activated contacts below ICL and performed a group comparison under patients' individual stimulation parameters. Here, the corrected amplitude required for tremor suppression was analyzed separately for both groups. ResultsWithin subject comparison with equal parameter settings revealed a significant improvement of sub-ICL compared to thalamic stimulation. In contrast, group comparison under patients' individual stimulation did not show any significant difference in tremor suppression between VIM and PSA DBS. Although higher corrected stimulation amplitude was needed in the thalamic group this difference was not significant. ConclusionThe data suggest that sub-ICL stimulation may be more efficient compared to thalamic stimulation but equally effective when patients' individual stimulation parameters are used.

Complications and Side Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation in the Posterior Subthalamic Area

Background: The posterior subthalamic area (PSA), including the zona incerta and prelemniscal radiation (Raprl), has recently been presented in number of publications as a promising target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of various movement disorders. In order to evaluate the safety of the procedure, we analyzed our initial 40 patients for complications and side effects. Methods: 40 patients treated with PSA DBS for Parkinson’s disease, essential tremor and other forms of tremor were included. Results: The most severe complication was 1 transient mild hemiparesis and 1 infection. Minor complications and side effects were relatively frequent, including mild transient dysphasia in 22.5% of the patients. Conclusions: Few serious complications were encountered, and we consider the PSA to be a safe target for DBS.