Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide Research Articles

Suprachoroidal triamcinolone versus posterior subtenon triamcinolone either alone or formulated in the management of diabetic macular edema

PurposeThis study aims to compare posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injection either formulated or alone versus suprachoroidal triamcinolone in the management of diabetic macular edema.MethodsThis study is a prospective interventional study that included 75 patients, divided into three groups, each group with 25 patients. Group I received a combination of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) (40 mg) and VISCOAT, which is a combination of sodium chondroitin sulfate (20 mg) and sodium hyaluronate (15 mg). The injection was done in the posterior subtenon space using the NAGATA cannula. Group II received TA (40 mg) in the posterior subtenon space. Group III underwent an injection of 4 mg/100µl of TA in the supra choroidal space.ResultsWe found a statistically significant difference between the three studied groups regarding BCVA (P = 0.001) and CMT at six months postoperative (P = 0.001) with the highest median BCVA and lowest median CMT observed in the formulated TA group.ConclusionWe concluded that early treatment of DME by formulated TA is better than TA alone, and suprachoroidal TA in the form of increasing the BCVA and decreasing the CMT without any elevation of IOP.Trial registration number NCT05464953.Date of registration 17/7/2022 (retrospectively registered).

Posterior sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide injection for annular choroidal detachment resistant to systemic immunosuppressive treatment.

Posterior sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide injection for annular choroidal detachment resistant to systemic immunosuppressive treatment.

Comparison between intravitreal ranibizumab injection and posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injection at time of cataract surgery for prevention of progression of diabetic macular edema

BackgroundThe goal of this work is to assess progression of diabetic macular edema (DME) following intravitreal ranibizumab injection compared to subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injection at cataract operation.MethodsRetrospective analysis of 73 eyes of 65 participant with DME, with central macular thickness (CMT) ≥ 300 μm. The included eyes were separated into three groups; phacoemulsification with intravitreal Ranibizumab injection group, phacoemulsification with subtenon Triamcinolone acetonide injection group and phacoemulsification only group. Main measures involved best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) one week, one month and three months post-operative. The CMT was compared preoperative and postoperative (one and three months).ResultsAfter 1 month of operation, there was a statistical substantial distinction in the median of CMT between ranibizumab & control group (p < 0.001), between subtenon TA & control group (p < 0.001) and in ranibizumab and subtenon TA group (p = 0.023). After 3 months, the variance between ranibizumab & control group was considerable (p < 0.0001) and the variance between subtenon TA & control group was considerable (p = 0.030).ConclusionsCombined phacoemulsification with intravitreal injections of ranibizumab or subtenon triamcinolone acetonide may prevent further progression in CMT in individuals with DME following cataract operation.

Posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide combined with phacoemulsification for patients with diabetic maculopathy

Posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide combined with phacoemulsification for patients with diabetic maculopathy

Effect of Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide in Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema

Objectives: To see the effect of Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide (PSTT) injection in refractory Diabetic Macular Edema (DME).&#x0D; Study Design: Quasi-Experimental Study.&#x0D; Place and Duration of Study: Retina Clinic, Al-Shifa Trust Eye Hospital, Rawalpindi, from Jun to Dec 2018.Methodology: Patients with Clinically Significant Macular Edema (CSME), with Central Macular Thickness (CMT) &gt;300 microns and those who did not respond to three consecutive Intra-Vitreal Bevacizumab (IVB) injections were included. Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide (PSTT) was administered by a single retina fellow using the same protocol. Each patient’s best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Intra-ocular pressure (IOP) and Central Macular Thickness (CMT) were evaluated on the day of Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide (PSTT) injection and again at 1, 3 and 6 months.&#x0D; Results: Out of 52 patients (104 eyes), 16 females and 36 males were present. The mean age was 57.67±9.35 years. Out of 52 right eyes, the mean Central Macular Thickness (CMT) at the first visit was 388.83±172.04 µm, 332.81 ± 144.69 µm after one month, 292.81±147.59µm after six months of Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide (PSTT) Injection. Similarly, for 52 left eyes mean Central Macular Thickness (CMT) at the first visit is 375.79±160.81 µm, 364.52 ± 167.95 µm after one month and 323.37±155.74 µm after six months. Similar results were observed for IOP and BCVA.&#x0D; Conclusion: Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone (PSTT) injections are effective in diabetic macular oedema, which does not respond to intravitreal anti-VEGF (IVB) therapy.

Posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide combined with phacoemulsification for patients with diabetic maculopathy

Posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide combined with phacoemulsification for patients with diabetic maculopathy

Intravitrealversus Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide in Conjunction with Intravitreal Bevacizumab for Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose &#x0D; Aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of combined simultaneous injection of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and bevacizumab versus intravitreal bevacizumab and posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide in treatment of persistent refractory diabetic macular edema after intravitreal bevacizumab injection failure&#x0D; Methods&#x0D; 40 pseudophakic diabetic patients were enrolled in quasi experimental study conducted at ophthalmology department. All eyes were specifically diagnosed with persistent refractory diabetic macular edema with central retinal thickness of _____on OCT. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A was given simultaneous injection of intravitreal bevacizumab 1.25mg/0.05ml with posterior subtenon triamcinolone 40mg and group B was given intravitreal bevacizumab in conjunction with simultaneous intravitreal triamcinolone 2mg/0.05 ml.Patients were followed upmonthly till three months. Changes in the best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure and central retinal thickness by optical coherence tomography were evaluated in both groups. Retreatment was given at 12 weeks interval whenever indicated by OCT.&#x0D; Results &#x0D; Group B showed a more significant decrease in the median CRT at 1month (p =0.0002)but after 3 months both groups showed a reduction in CRT which was not statistically significant between two groups _____. Both groups had significant improvement in BCVA compared to pre-injection baseline visual acuity.Between two groups BCVA changes were not statistically significant at 3 months _____.Five eyes in group B developed IOP beyond 22mmHg, which was treated with anti glaucoma medications within 2 weeks. No eye in group A developed IOP greater than 21mmHg. At 12 weeks, 7 of group A patients and 6 of group B patients developed recurrent macular edema and required repeated injections.&#x0D; Conclusion&#x0D; While treating persistent refractory diabetic macular edema, posterior subtenon triamcinolone is as effective as intravitreal triamcinolone in conjunction with intravitreal bevacizumab in reducing CRT and improving and stabilizing BCVA but in terms of IOP rise posterior subtenon injection is safer as compared to intravitreal injection. Both treatments are cost effective and combined simultaneous injections decrease the number of repeated injections.

Choroidal Structural Changes of Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection in Eyes with Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema.

Purpose To access the choroidal structural changes of posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide (PSTA) injection in eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods Patients with refractory DME were enrolled and followed for 4 weeks after switching to PSTA injection. All patients underwent spectral-domain optical coherence tomography with enhanced depth imaging, and the choroidal images were binarized into the luminal area and total choroidal area. Subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and choroidal vascularity index (CVI) were evaluated before and after switching treatments. Results After switching to PSTA treatment, the final best-corrected visual acuity and central subfield thickness in eyes with refractory DME were significantly improved compared to the baseline values (P=0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively). Both the SFCT and CVI decreased during the follow-up period, and significant decreases were observed at 4-week follow-up (P < 0.001 and P=0.012, respectively). The linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between the baseline SFCT and the final visual outcomes (P=0.047). Conclusions The alterations of SFCT and CVI in this study suggest that the choroidal vasculature is involved in the pathogenesis of refractory DME and could be affected by PSTA treatment. SFCT rather than CVI may be a prognostic biomarker for eyes with refractory DME.

Intraocular Pressure Elevation After Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection in Pediatric Non-Infectious Uveitis.

The objectives of the study were to evaluate non-infectious pediatric uveitis patients developing elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucoma following posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide (PSTA) injection. The data of 26 pediatric (<18 years) patients with active uveitis were retrospectively evaluated. Exclusion criteria were patients with a previous IOP >21 mmHg and previous subtenon or intraocular steroid injection. The IOP values of the patients before and after the PSTA injection and the treatments administered were recorded. PSTA injection was used in a total of 40 eyes. The mean IOP was 14.0±2.3 (12-19) mmHg before PSTA. The IOP was elevated (≥21 mmHg) in 19 eyes (48%) after PSTA with a mean IOP of 32.9±11.7 mmHg (22-55). The mean interval time to IOP elevation was 3.3±1.9 weeks (1-8). The IOP was controlled in 15 eyes (79%) with topical anti-glaucomatous and these patients were considered as having transient IOP elevation. Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C was required in 4 eyes (21%) in whom the IOP could not be controlled despite the use of maximum topical medication and oral acetazolamide at a mean duration of 9.7±3.6 months (4-19). Subtenon deposit excision was performed in 2 eyes (11%). The mean IOP at the last follow-up was 16.0±2.4 mmHg (12-20). In our study, an IOP elevation rate as high as 47% was found in pediatric non-infectious uveitis patients following only a single PSTA injection. Steroid-induced IOP elevation and resistant glaucoma can develop even after the first PSTA administration in pediatric uveitis. Filtration surgery and the excision of subtenon triamcinolone deposits, when present, are important in glaucoma management. The risk/benefit ratio must be carefully considered when administering steroid injections to children with uveitis.

Macular dual retinitis with Herpes simplex and Cytomegalovirus following periocular corticosteroid in a patient of Pemphigus Vulgaris.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis may occur in non-HIV individuals following systemic immunosuppressive treatment or periocular corticosteroid administration. However, simultaneous multiple viral retinitis is rare in HIV-negative individuals. We report a case of dual viral retinitis in a non-HIV female on systemic immunosuppressive for pemphigus vulgaris who was administered a periocular corticosteroid injection. A 32-year-old female on double immunosuppressive therapy (prednisolone and cyclophosphamide) for pemphigus vulgaris, presented with gradual painless diminution of vision in the right eye for one month. She was initially diagnosed to have possible autoimmune neuroretinitis by the referring ophthalmologist and received a single injection of posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide for the same. Her vision however deteriorated further and she received an intravitreal ganciclovir injection with a revised diagnosis of CMV retinitis. Due to suboptimal response she was referred to us. Aqueous Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) revealed dual positivity for CMV and Herpes simplex virus. She was successfully managed with intravitreal ganciclovir injections, systemic acyclovir and tapering of systemic immunosuppressive drugs. The retinitis lesions resolved gradually leaving behind a pale optic disc and foveal atrophy at 12 weeks follow-up. Infective etiology must be ruled out in immunosuppressed patients before considering periocular corticosteroids. Dual viral involvement, although rare, may cause fulminant retinitis in predisposed individuals. High index of suspicion and PCR from ocular fluids should be performed at the earliest in patients with atypical or poorly responding retinitis lesions.

Resolution of Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema: 2 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide versus 40 mg Posterior Sub-Tenon Triamcinolone Acetonide

ABSTRACT Purpose To compare 2 mg intravitreal triamcinolone (IVT) versus 40 mg posterior sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide (STT) for the treatment of eyes with pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Methods A retrospective, single-center review of eyes receiving 2 mg IVT between 3/1/2012-3/1/2017 and 40 mg STT between 1/1/2015-3/1/2017. Visual acuity (VA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were recorded at baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up visits. Results Forty-five eyes were included in the IVT group and 50 eyes in the STT group. Change in VA from baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months was not significantly different between IVT and STT (6 months: 2.3 lines vs. 2.4 lines, p = .10). The IVT group achieved significantly better CMT improvement from baseline compared to STT at 1 month (255 μm vs. 187 μm; p = .03), but this difference was not present at month 3 (214 μm vs. 212 μm; p = .79) or month 6 (176 μm vs. 207 μm; p = .29). During the 6-month follow-up period, approximately 7% of eyes in the IVT group and 12% of eyes in the STT group developed ocular hypertension (p = .43), and all cases were successfully managed with topical anti-ocular hypertensive therapy or observation. Conclusions 2 mg IVT and 40 mg STT both achieved significant improvement in vision and CMT with no significant difference between interventions at 3- and 6-month follow-up.

Combined intravitreal ranibizumab and posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injections for patients with diabetic macular edema refractory to intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy.

PURPOSE:The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) alone and concurrent IVR with posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide (PSTA) injection for patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) refractory to IVR monotherapy.MATERIALS AND METHODS:We enrolled 43 eyes of 43 patients with DME who received at least three times of IVR, which resulted in poor anatomical responses, with central foveal thickness (CFT) reduction <10% and postinjection CFT >300 μm. All the eyes received initial 3 monthly then pro re nata (PRN) IVR 0.5-mg injections. Twenty eyes continued PRN injections and 23 eyes received combined IVR 0.5 mg and PSTA 40 mg with at least 1-year follow-up. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and CFT were recorded from 1-month to 1-year follow-up.RESULTS:Following switch to combined therapy, the mean BCVA significantly improved from 0.61 ± 0.32 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) to 0.45±0.39 logMAR at 6 month (P = 0.003), 0.43±0.35 logMAR at 9 months (P < 0.001), and 0.48±0.45 logMAR at 1 year (P = 0.03). In eyes with IVR alone, no significant VA improvement was noted throughout the year. Significantly better BCVA was noted in the combined group at 6-month, 9-month, and 1-year follow-up compared to IVR-alone group. The timing of combined therapy showed a significant association with 1-year BCVA (t = 3.25, P = 0.018).CONCLUSION:Concurrent IVR and PSTA resulted in significantly better visual outcomes in 1-year follow-up for those refractory to preceding ranibizumab monotherapy for DME. Early addition of PSTA predicted a better visual outcome.

Intravitreal Ranibizumab versus Intravitreal Ranibizumab Combined with Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide in Diabetic Macular Edema

Objectives:This is a retrospective, comparative evaluation of the short-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and IVR combined with posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide (STA) in the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME).Methods:A total of 79 pseudophakic eyes of 57 patients with DME who underwent IVR injection treatment were examined retrospectively. All of the patients were treatment-naive. In the study group (STA+IVR), consisting of 30 eyes of 39 patients, the STA and IVR were administered in the first treatment session simultaneously, followed by 2 consecutive monthly IVR injections. In the control group (IVR only) comprised 40 eyes of 27 patients, 3 consecutive monthly IVR injections were administered. Patients with serous retinal detachment (SRD) according to optical coherence tomography images were identified in both groups for subgroup analyses. The primary outcome measures were changes in central macular thickness (CMT), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and the intraocular pressure (IOP) at 1, 2, and 3 months post-injection.Results:There was no statistically significant difference between the demographic characteristics of the patients’ baseline BCVA and CMT measurements (p>0.05). For the IVR group, the mean pre-treatment CMT and BCVA was 421.20±89.10 μm and 0.42±0.24 logMAR, respectively. After the third injection, the mean was 308.12±59.07 μm and 0.20±0.12 logMAR, respectively. The combined treatment group baseline measurements were 454.50±122.52 μm and 0.54±0.29 logMAR, respectively. After the third injection, the mean was 294.22±50.33 μm and 0.27±0.21 logMAR, respectively. The decrease was statistically significant for both groups (p=0.001). Comparison of the CMT within groups revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of the combined group after the second injection (p=0.017). There was no statistically significant difference in the BCVA gains between groups (p>0.05). Patients with SRD were evaluated as a subgroup, and at the first month, the mean gain in CMT was -71.63±57.98 μm in the control group and -123.61±93.46 μm in the study group (p=0.048). The required anti-glaucomatous treatment was statistically significant in the combined group (p=0.008).Conclusion:Both treatments provided improvement in BCVA and CMT and can be considered functional and anatomically effective treatment options for DME.

Effect of posterior sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide as ‎an adjunct therapy to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth ‎factor in the management of diabetic macular oedema

ABSTRACT Background: to monitor and compare the effect of posterior sub-tenon triamcinolone acetonide injection as an adjunct therapy to intravitreal ranibizumab injection on patients with diabetic macular oedema. Aim of the Work: To assess the effect of combined intravitreal ranibizumab injection, and sub-tenon triamcinolone acetonide injection in the management of diabetic macular oedema. Patients and Methods: Patients with diabetic retinopathy associated with DME (Central macular thickness over 300 um) which are randomly allocated into two groups. In group 1, three monthly doses (0.5 mg) of intravitreal ranibizumab are received. In group 2, the anti-VEGF injection was performed 3times monthly with the sub-tenon steroid injection [triamcinolone acetonide] during the 1st injection. All patients’ best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), IOP and CMT were followed up for six months. Results: The combined treatment showed improved best-corrected visual acuity from baseline 0.15 ± 0.15 log MAR to 0.46 ± 0.19 log MAR (p 0.001). When comparing the combination treatment with the anti-VEGF treatment alone, recovery of BCVA and CMT was statistically significant (p <0.001‎). Conclusion: sub-tenon triamcinolone addition to the routine anti-VEGF therapy is an effective method for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema not only in rapid and great improvement but also in decreased frequent injections.

Phacoemulsification with Posterior Sub-Tenon Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection for Prevention of Progression of Diabetic Macular Edema after Cataract Surgery

Background: diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of visual loss in diabetic patients. The pathogenesis of DME is multifactorial. It results from multiple biochemical and cellular changes that eventually cause leakage and exudation. A number of patient characteristics such as increasing age, females, duration of DM, poor glycemic control and moderate to severe retinopathy have been found associated with poor prognosis after cataract surgery in diabetic patients. Objective: the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of phacoemulsification with posterior sub-Tenon’s triamcinolone acetonide injection for prevention of progression of diabetic macular edema following uneventful cataract surgery by phacoemulsification. Patients and Methodology: this interventional study included 20 eyes of 20 diabetic patients with visually significant cataract and coexisting DME during the period from December 2017 to October 2018. Preoperative and postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using LogMAR and intraocular pressure (IOP) were recorded. Results: statistically significant improvement in BCVA was detected when comparing postoperative values at one week, one month and three months to corresponding preoperative values. In addition, values at one month and three months were significantly improved when compared to values at one week post-operative. On other hand, values at three months revealed non-significant difference when compared to values at one month. Conclusion: this study suggests that posterior sub-Tenon’s triamcinolone acetonide injection can be given safely and easily at the time of phacoemulsification surgery in patients with visually significant cataract and DME.

Phacoemulsification with Posterior Sub-Tenon Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection for Prevention of Progression of Diabetic Macular Edema after Cataract Surgery

Phacoemulsification with Posterior Sub-Tenon Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection for Prevention of Progression of Diabetic Macular Edema after Cataract Surgery

Cystoid macular edema secondary to gyrate atrophy in a child treated with sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide

Purpose: Gyrate atrophy (GA) of the fundus is a rare, progressive metabolic disease secondary to the deficiency of the pyridoxal phosphate-dependent enzyme, ornithine aminotransferase. GA may lead to cystoid macular edema (CME) resulting from chronic inflammation. We aimed to report a child case with CME secondary to gyrate atrophy. Methods: Herein we presented a GA case treated with posterior sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide injection. Results: Optical coherence tomography examination revealed the disappearance of the macular edema that is a vision-threatening complication in GA. Conclusion: The present case showed that the posterior sub-Tenon injection of long acting steroids might be a promising treatment in CME secondary to GA.

Oral kallidinogenase improved visual acuity and maintained chorioretinal blood flow levels after treatment for diabetic macular edema.

PurposeThis study was designed to investigate the therapeutic effects of oral kallidinogenase medication as an adjuvant therapy in treating patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).Study designThis was a prospective, open-labeled, randomized study.MethodsAll patients were given posterior sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) injection and focal laser treatment session for DME. The patients were subdivided into two groups: 1) those treated with oral kallidinogenase for at least 6 months after local treatment (treated group) and 2) those treated without oral kallidinogenase (untreated group). In this study, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT), and chorioretinal blood flow level were measured in 17 patients (19 eyes). Chorioretinal blood flow levels at the disc and macula were measured by laser speckle flowgraphy and evaluated using the mean blur rate (MBR). These data were measured at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment initiation.ResultsBCVA at 6 months after treatment significantly improved in treated group (P<0.05). But the mean CRT after treatment significantly decreased in both groups. There was no significant difference in the mean SCT at baseline between the two groups. The mean SCT after treatment in treated group was significantly thinner than that before treatment (P<0.05). Compared to baseline (100%), MBR at the disc and the macula at 6 months after treatment significantly decreased to 84.8% and 86.2%, respectively, in untreated group (P<0.05), though it remained unchanged at 98.7% and 99.7% in treated group.ConclusionOral kallidinogenase medication is useful as an adjuvant therapy to enhance the therapeutic effect of STTA in DME patients.

Comparison between intravitreal bevacizumab and posterior sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.

AimTo compare the efficacy and safety between posterior sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (PSTA) and intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (Avastin) (IVIA) in the treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.Patients and methodsA total of 45 eyes were retrospectively enrolled (23 eyes with intravitreal bevacizumab and 22 eyes with posterior sub-tenon triamcinolone acetonide). Main endpoints included logMAR of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) before and after treatment at 6 months.ResultsThe mean logMAR improved from 0.78 to 0.56 at 6 months for intravitreal bevacizumab (p=0.001), and from 0.91 to 0.79 and 0.87 at 3 and 6 months (p=0.038 and 0.13), respectively, for sub-tenon triamcinolone acetonide. At 6 months, the BCVA was significantly better in the bevacizumab group (p=0.02). Both groups’ mean CMT significantly improved, from 478 µm at baseline to 295 µm at 6 months in IVIA group (p<0.001) and from 419 µm at baseline to 350 µm in PSTA group (p=0.012); however, this was not different between the groups at 6 months (p=0.065). Recurrence of macular edema was not different between the groups either (p=0.08). Poorer final vision was associated with poorer baseline BCVA and diagnosis of central retinal vein occlusion after adjustment for age and sex (p<0.001 and 0.012, respectively). Significant elevation of IOP was noted at 3 months in the PSTA group, but declined at 6 months compared with baseline (p=0.002 and 0.41, respectively).ConclusionIntravitreal bevacizumab seemed to achieve better visual acuity compared with posterior sub-tenon injections of triamcinolone acetonide at 6 months, while CMT was comparable. PSTA still resulted in transient IOP elevation.

Scedosporium apiospermum infectious scleritis following posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injection: a case report and literature review

BackgroundUbiquitous fungi of the Scedosporium apiospermum species complex (SASC) cause various opportunistic infections. Posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) injection is a standard therapy for intraocular inflammation and macular edema. We report a case of Scedosporium apiospermum infectious scleritis after a posterior STTA injection.Case presentationA 75-year-old man received a posterior STTA injection to treat macular edema in his left eye. After 3 months, he complained of ocular pain and hyperemia in his left eye. Examination showed a subtenon abscess in the site corresponding with the STTA injection. After incising the abscess, the smear revealed numerous conidia-like structures. Although we suspected fungal infection and started topical voriconazole (VRCZ) and levofloxacin, the inflammation of the eye worsened. Fungal culture revealed filamentous fungus growth. Subsequently, we added systemic VRCZ and performed surgical debridement of the infected sclera and Tenon’s capsule. Pathology of the sclera showed fungal hyphae. The antifungal susceptibility test revealed low minimum inhibitory concentrations for micafungin, VRCZ and miconazole (0.06, 0.25 and 0.5 μg/mL, respectively). After 2 months, the ciliary injection subsided and VRCZ therapy was stopped. However, subtenon abscess recurred 1 month after discontinuation of topical VRCZ. Surgical debridement and topical VRCZ were resumed, with the eye finally improving after 5 months of management. The fungal species was identified as Scedosporium apiospermum sensu stricto morphologically and by DNA sequencing.ConclusionsThis case was successfully treated by topical and systemic VRCZ and repeated surgical debridement. Infectious scleritis caused by SASC rarely develops after posterior STTA. SASC can produce conidia in the enclosed subtenon space. Late-onset infectious scleritis after a posterior STTA injection suggests the presence of a fungal infection, including SASC, thereby requiring extensive and prolonged medical and surgical treatment.