Posterior Spinal Fusion In Patients Research Articles

Double major curvature treated with vertebral body tethering of both curves: how do outcomes compare to posterior spinal fusion?

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion alternative to posterior spinal fusion (PSF). There have been few reports on VBT of two curvatures. We aim to compare the radiographic outcomes between VBT and PSF in patients with double curvatures in which both curves were instrumented. 29 AIS patients matched by Lenke, age (± 2years), triradiate cartilage closure status, major Cobb angle (± 8°), and T5-T12 kyphosis (± 10°). Variables were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Student's t tests, and chi-Square. Clinical success was defined as major curve < 35°. Group baseline demographics were similar. Major thoracic (T) curve types had significantly better major (VBT 51.5 ± 7.9° to 31.6 ± 12.0° [40%] vs. PSF 54.3 ± 7.4° to 17.4 ± 6.5° [68%]; p = 0.0002) and secondary curve correction in the PSF group. 71% of major T VBT patients were clinically successful versus 100% of PSF. Major thoracolumbar (TL) curve types experienced comparable major (VBT 52.3 ± 7.0° to 18.3 ± 11.4° (65%) vs. PSF 53.0 ± 5.2° to 23.8 ± 10.9° (56%); p = 0.2397) and secondary curve correction. 92% of major TL VBT patients were clinically successful versus 75% in the PSF group. There was no difference in T5-12 kyphosis or lumbar lordosis between groups for any curve type. There were 4 patients (13.8%) with major complications in the VBT group compared to 0 (0%) in the PSF. Patients with double major AIS who underwent VBT with major T curve types had less correction than PSF; however, those with major TL curves experienced similar radiographic outcomes regardless of procedure. Complications were greater for VBT.

Minimally Invasive Posterior Spinal Nonfusion Surgery in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using a Bipolar One-Way Self-Expanding Rod System: Protocol for a Single-Center Clinical Cohort Study.

The current surgical treatment for patients diagnosed with progressive and severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) consists of the correction of the spinal curvature, followed by posterior spinal fusion (PSF). However, research has uncovered short- and long-term complications of posterior spinal fusion in patients with AIS. Minimally invasive growing rod techniques have successfully been used to treat patients with early-onset scoliosis and neuromuscular scoliosis. It may be questioned if minimally invasive posterior spinal nonfusion (PSnF) surgery with bipolar instrumentation can be used for the treatment of AIS. This study will be performed to monitor the efficacy and safety of PSnF surgery by using a commercially available Conformité Européenne-certified spinal implant consisting of bilateral bipolar one-way self-expanding rods (OWSER) for the treatment of patients diagnosed with AIS. In 14 selected patients with AIS with Lenke 1-6 curves, minimally invasive PSnF surgery with the OWSER system is performed after the failure of conservative treatment (curve progression of >5° within 1 year). The patients are over 7 years of age, with a major Cobb angle of ≥30°, sufficient flexibility, and a Risser stage of ≤2. Patients will be followed over time, according to the standard medical care. Efficacy will be measured using radiological and patient satisfaction assessments and safety will be determined by the amount of perioperative complications. Patient inclusion started on November 17, 2021 and we hope to finalize patient inclusion by the beginning of 2025. The first results will be expected by the beginning of 2024. Minimally invasive PSnF in patients with AIS is presented as a less invasive surgical technique that prevents the progression of the scoliotic curve and that allows minor posture correction of coronal imbalance. This will be the first study to examine whether the PSnF bipolar OWSER instrumentation will be the next generation of surgical instrumentation in AIS. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04441411; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04441411. DERR1-10.2196/47222.

Posterior spinal fusion in patients with spinal muscular atrophy: a surgical technique to allow intrathecally inject nusinersen.

Nusinersen, the recently approved medical therapy in the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), has revolutionized the natural history of this disease. Until now, surgical treatment of scoliosis in SMA patients was an exclusion criterion for drug therapy. In fact, the bone graft positioned posteriorly during surgery, in order to obtain a solid fusion, prevented the lumbar puncture necessary for the intrathecal administration of the drug. The aim is to describe a surgical technique that allows for safe and easy intrathecal administration of nusinersen. We present a single-center, single-surgeon case series descriptive study. From 2019 to 2021 seven consecutive patients affected by genetically confirmed SMA suitable for treatment with nusinersen and suffered from neuromuscular scoliosis needing posterior spinal fusion surgery were included in the present study. During posterior spinal fusion surgery a L3-L4 or L2-L3 laminectomy was performed to provide safer access to intrathecal injection. The drainage scar was used as a skin landmark so as to facilitate future procedures. The median of operative time was 250 min (range: 200-370 min). The median correction rate was 57% (range: 43.5-68). The median of intraoperative blood loss was 650 mL (range 320-940 mL). The median value of the correction loss at the last follow-up was 10% (range: 4.5-15%). The surgical procedure allowed all patients to receive nusinersen therapy without complications. The procedure described is simple and effective in providing safe intrathecal access to make these patients suitable for undertaking or continuing the protocol of treatment with nusinersen.

Early Complications After Posterior Spinal Fusion in Patients With Rett Syndrome.

Neuromuscular scoliosis in Rett syndrome (RS) is common, progressive, and often requires posterior spinal fusion (PSF). While PSF is associated with improved overall outcomes, there is a paucity of information describing complications. We aimed to report the postoperative complications, readmissions, and reoperations for patients with RS undergoing PSF. Female pediatric patients with RS treated by PSF with segmental instrumentation, with or without concurrent pelvis fixation, during January 2012 to August 2022 were included. Preoperative patient characteristics, intraoperative data (estimated blood loss, cell saver, packed red blood cells transfused), postoperative complications according to the Modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink classification within 90 days, unplanned readmissions within 30 days, and unplanned reoperations within 90 days were recorded. A total of 25 females were included. The mean (SD) age at surgery was 12.9 (1.8) years and the mean follow-up of 38.6 (24.9) months. The mean preoperative major coronal curve was 79 degrees (23 degrees) which decreased to 32 degrees (15 degrees) by the last follow-up ( P <0.001). The median estimated blood loss was 600mL and length of stay was 7 days. There were 81 total postoperative complications (3.2 complications/patient). Eight (32%) had grade IVa complications (disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, hypotensive shock, respiratory failure, chronic urosepsis). Five (20%) patients experienced seizures, 48% had pulmonary complications, and 56% had gastrointestinal complications. There were 3 readmissions (12%) within 30 days for pneumonia and 2 (8%) reoperations (an incision and drainage and C2-T2 fusion for significant kyphosis) within 90 days. One patient also had their fusion extended to the pelvis 1 year later. There were more nonambulatory patients in the group fused to the pelvis, but otherwise no differences between those fused and unfused to the pelvis. This is the largest review of early postoperative complications for patients with RS who underwent PSF. PSF effectively reduced the major coronal curve, but surgeons and families should be aware of a high postoperative seizure and respiratory complication rate, as well as 8% having reoperations within 90 days and 12% being readmitted within 30 days. Level IV-therapeutic study.

A dedicated surgical team for posterior spinal fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis improves OR efficiency.

Standardized care pathways for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing PSF improve clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that having dedicated spine personnel would decrease surgical time and improve clinical outcomes. 367 patients with AIS had a PSF within a standardized perioperative care pathway. Cases with 1-3 dedicated spine team members (any combination of circulating nurse, surgical technologist, and anesthesiologist) were compared to teams with none. The impact of individual members was also analyzed. Parametric or non-parametric tests were used for each outcome based on the distribution of the data points. These included one-way ANOVA models, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Fisher's exact tests. Surgical time and total OR time were significantly decreased with the participation of each additional dedicated team member resulting in 43.86min less surgical time and 50.8min less total OR time when three team members were present compared to no team members. If the nurse was a spine member, the surgical time was lower (p = 0.037). If the technologist was a team member, the surgical time and total OR time were lower (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, respectively). Lastly, if the anesthesiologist was a member of the team, the anesthesia time was lower (p = 0.003). No significant clinical differences were observed. Having dedicated surgical team members decreases surgical and total OR time for AIS patients undergoing PSF, and this OR efficiency improves as the dedicated team is more robust. OR surgical teams did not influence clinical outcomes. Hospitals should strongly consider developing surgical teams to improve OR efficiency of PSF cases.

Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering Compared with Posterior Spinal Fusion for Major Thoracic Curves: A Retrospective Comparison by the Harms Study Group.

Anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) is an alternative to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for the surgical treatment of scoliosis. The present study utilized a large, multicenter database and propensity matching to compare outcomes of AVBT to PSF in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Patients with thoracic idiopathic scoliosis who underwent AVBT with a minimum 2-year follow-up retrospectively underwent 2 methods of propensity-guided matching to PSF patients from an idiopathic scoliosis registry. Radiographic, clinical, and Scoliosis Research Society 22-Item Questionnaire (SRS-22) data were compared preoperatively and at the ≥2-year follow-up. A total of 237 AVBT patients were matched with 237 PSF patients. In the AVBT group, the mean age was 12.1 ± 1.6 years, the mean follow-up was 2.2 ± 0.5 years, 84% of patients were female, and 79% of patients had a Risser sign of 0 or 1, compared with 13.4 ± 1.4 years, 2.3 ± 0.5 years, 84% female, and 43% Risser 0 or 1 in the PSF group. The AVBT group was younger (p < 0.001), had a smaller mean thoracic curve preoperatively (48 ± 9°; range, 30° to 74°; compared with 53 ± 8°; range, 40° to 78° in the PSF group; p < 0.001), and had less initial correction (41% ± 16% correction to 28° ± 9° compared with 70% ± 11% correction to 16° ± 6° in the PSF group; p < 0.001). Thoracic deformity at the time of the latest follow-up was 27° ± 12° (range, 1° to 61°) for AVBT compared with 20° ± 7° (range, 3° to 42°) for PSF (p < 0.001). A total of 76% of AVBT patients had a thoracic curve of <35° at the latest follow-up compared with 97.4% of PSF patients (p < 0.001). A residual curve of >50° was present in 7 AVBT patients (3%), 3 of whom underwent subsequent PSF, and in 0 PSF patients (0%). Forty-six subsequent procedures were performed in 38 AVBT patients (16%), including 17 conversions to PSF and 16 revisions for excessive correction, compared with 4 revision procedures in 3 PSF patients (1.3%; p < 0.01). AVBT patients had lower median preoperative SRS-22 mental-health component scores (p < 0.01) and less improvement in the pain and self-image scores between preoperatively and the ≥2-year follow-up (p < 0.05). In the more strictly matched analysis (n = 108 each), 10% of patients in the AVBT group and 2% of patients in the PSF group required a subsequent surgical procedure. At a mean follow-up of 2.2 years, 76% of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent AVBT had a residual curve of <35° compared with 97.4% of patients who underwent PSF. A total of 16% of cases in the AVBT group required a subsequent surgical procedure compared with 1.3% in the PSF group. An additional 4 cases (1.3%) in the AVBT group had a residual curve of >50° that may require revision or conversion to PSF. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Does the use of intrawound povidone-iodine irrigation and local vancomycin powder impact surgical site infection rate in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery?

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a major complication after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery, with an incidence ranging from 0.5 to 7%. Intraoperative wound decontamination with povidone-iodine (PVP-I) irrigation and/or vancomycin powder in adult spinal surgery has gained attention in the literature with controversial results. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of using intrawound PVP-I irrigation and local vancomycin powder (LVP) on the incidence of early SSI in AIS surgery. All AIS patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion between October 2016 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of early SSI was reported and compared between 2 groups defined by the treating spinal surgeons' preferences: group 1-intrawound irrigation with 2L of PVP-I and application of 3g LVP before closure and control group 2-patients that did not receive either of these measures. Nine early cases of SSI (2.9%) were reported among the 307 AIS posterior spinal fusion patients. Incidence of SSI in group 1 (2/178 = 1.1%) was significantly lower than in group 2 (7/129 = 5.4%; p = 0.04). There were no adverse reactions to the use of PVP-I and LVP in our study. At latest follow-up, rate of surgical revision for mechanical failure with pseudarthrosis was significantly lower in group 1 (2/178 = 1.1%) than in group 2 (9/129 = 7.0%; p = 0.01). Intraoperative use of intrawound PVP-I irrigation and vancomycin powder is associated with a significant reduction of early SSI after AIS spine surgery. Retrospective study.

Modified Clavien-Dindo-sink classification system for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

The Clavien-Dindosink (CDS) classification system provides more treatment-focused granularity than subjective methods of describing surgical complications; however, it has not been validated in posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The purpose of this study was to modify the CDS system for application in patients with AIS undergoing PSF to assess its inter- and intra-rater reliability for describing complications faced by this population. A review of all complications specific to patients with AIS captured in a large multicenter international database was performed. All complications were classified according to CDS, modified by addition of "prolonged initial hospital stay" as a criterion for Grade II. A survey of this complication list and an additional 20 clinical vignettes (sent out on two occasions) was sent to nine spinal deformity surgeons. Weighted kappa values were used to determine inter- and intra-rater reliability. The Fleiss κ value for interrater reliability among 5 respondents grading all AIS complications was 0.8 (very good). For each grade, interrater reliability was very good, with an overall range of 0.8-1. The overall kappa value for intrarater reliability among eight respondents grading 20 vignettes was between 0.6 (good) and 0.9 (very good). The modified CDS classification system has very good interrater and intrarater reliability in describing complications following PSF in patients with AIS. This system may be of greater utility for reporting outcomes than a "major" versus "minor" complication system and can serve as a valuable tool for improving surgical practices and patient outcomes in this population. IV case series.

Caudally directed upper-instrumented vertebra pedicle screws associated with minimized risk of proximal junctional failure in patients with long posterior spinal fusion for adult spinal deformity

BACKGROUND CONTEXTIt is unknown whether upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) pedicle screw trajectory and UIV screw-rod angle are associated with development of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and/or proximal junctional failure (PJF). PURPOSETo determine whether (1) the cranial-caudal trajectory of UIV pedicle screws and (2) UIV screw-vertebra angle are associated with PJK and/or PJF after long posterior spinal fusion in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGRetrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLEWe included 96 patients with ASD who underwent fusion from T9–T12 to the pelvis (>5 vertebrae fused) between 2008 and 2015. OUTCOME MEASURESPedicle screw trajectory was measured as the UIV pedicle screw–vertebra angle (UIV-PVA), which is the mean of the two angles between the UIV superior endplate and both UIV pedicle screws. (Positive values indicate screws angled cranially; negative values indicate screws angled caudally.) We measured UIV rod-vertebra angle (UIV-RVA) between the rod at the point of screw attachment and the UIV superior endplate. METHODSDuring ≥2-year follow-up, 38 patients developed PJK, and 28 developed PJF. Mean (± standard deviation) UIV-PVA was −0.9° ± 6.0°. Mean UIV-RVA was 87° ± 5.2°. We examined the development of PJK and PJF using a UIV-PVA/UIV-RVA cutoff of 3° identified by a receiver operating characteristic curve, while controlling for osteoporosis, age, sex, and preoperative thoracic kyphosis. RESULTSPatients with UIV-PVA ≥3° had significantly greater odds of developing PJK (odds ratio 2.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.0–7.1) and PJF (odds ratio 3.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.3–10) compared with patients with UIV-PVA <3°. UIV-RVA was not significantly associated with development of PJK or PJF. CONCLUSIONSIn long thoracic fusion to the pelvis for ASD, UIV-PVA ≥3° was associated with 2.7-fold greater odds of PJK and 3.6-fold greater odds of PJF compared with UIV-PVA <3°. UIV-RVA was not associated with PJK or PJF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCEIII

Comparison of clinical and functional outcomes of vertebral body tethering to posterior spinal fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and evaluation of quality of life: preliminary results.

This preliminary study was aimed to present the results of the comparison of clinical and functional outcomes of vertebral body tethering (VBT) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for the first time in the literature. 21 thoracolumbar (T5-L3) VBT patients (VBT group); and 22 age-gender-fusion level and minimum follow-up duration matched thoracolumbar (T3-L3) PSF patients (PSF group) were enrolled. Average FU duration of group 1 and 2 were 37.1/37.8months (p = 0.33). Patients clinical data together with SRS-22 scores and SF-36 scores were compared. A retrospective, comparative study was undertaken. VBT group was detected to have superior lumbar range of motion; superior anterior-lateral lumbar bending flexibility; superior flexor and extensor endurances of trunk, and superior average motor strength of trunk muscles with high statistical significance. VBT group was also detected to have superior scores regarding life quality, including better average total SRS-22 and better average SF-36 MCS/PCS scores with also high statistical significance. This study for the first time in the literature concluded, that in skeletally immature patients with AIS, VBT as a result of the utilization of growth modulation was able to yield significantly superior lumbar range of motion, lumbar anterior and lateral flexibility, trunk flexor-extensor endurance and trunk motor strength as compared to patients who underwent fusion. By yielding significantly superior SRS-22 and SF-36 scores, VBT was detected to provide better life quality and patient satisfaction than fusion. This study concluded hereby, that by applying VBT, spinal motion could be preserved and complications of fusion could be avoided.

Impact of Spinal Deformity Characteristics on Patient-reported Outcome Measurement Information System Scores in Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion.

The impact of posterior spinal fusion (PSF) on physical function and pain and mental health in pediatric patients as quantified by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), developed by the National Institute of Health, is largely unknown. The purpose of this study is to report the changes of PROMIS scores for upper extremity (UE), pain interference (PI), mobility (MOB), and peer relationships (PR) after PSF in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS), compare postoperative changes in PROMIS PI and Scoliosis Research Society-30 pain scores, and evaluate associations between curve characteristics and PROMIS scores. A retrospective cohort of 122 patients (<18 years old) who underwent PSF for IS was identified through electronic medical record search. PROMIS scores were obtained preoperatively and 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 years, 2 years, and 3 years postoperatively. The mean age of the cohort was 14.2 ± 1.6 years, and the mean Cobb angle was 62.9 ± 13.8° at surgery. Eighty patients had preoperative PROMIS data. UE and MOB scores were statistically lower at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively and returned to baseline with a longer follow-up. PI scores were significantly lower at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. PR was unchanged up to 2 years postoperatively and then showed significant improvement. There was a statistically significant negative relationships between lowest instrumented vertebra and PROMIS UE and MOB scores at 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively, but not at a longer follow-up. There were no significant differences noted in PI and PR PROMIS scores and lowest instrumented vertebra. PROMIS scores were not statistically associated with the Lenke Classification, number of vertebral levels fused, or percentage coronal correction. Changes in PROMIS functional domains (UE and MOB) postoperatively normalize at longer follow-ups. Changes in PI and PR demonstrated improvements over preoperative values at 1 to 2 years postoperatively. Preoperative coronal and sagittal measures, and the percentage correction did not correlate with any PROMIS scores.

Fenestrated Pedicle Screws in Spinal Oncology: Technique and Comparative Retrospective Analysis.

The use of spinal stabilization with decompression has been shown to improve survival, spinal stability, and ambulatory status in patients with metastatic spinal tumors. However, the poor bone quality typically seen in these patients can prevent adequate stabilization. Fenestrated pedicle screws permit augmented fixation via injection of bone cement into the vertebral body upon screw placement, potentially mitigating the difficulties in achieving adequate stabilization in these patients. To compare surgical outcomes of posterior spinal fusion in patients with cancerous spinal lesions between polymethyl methacrylate cement-augmented fenestrated screws and standard pedicle screws. A total of 19 consecutive patients with cancerous spinal lesions receiving posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with pedicle screws from a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed for demographic information, comorbidities, surgical parameters, and outcomes. Ten patients underwent PSF with cement augmentation, whereas 9 underwent standard PSF. There was no significant difference in demographics, comorbidities, or surgical characteristics. Operative time was significantly greater in the cement-augmented group (302 ± 100 minutes vs 203 ± 55 minutes; P = .015). There was no significant difference in rates of operation or readmission between the cohorts nor was there any significant difference in discharge disposition. There was 1 case of surgical site infection (in a patient with a fenestrated screw) and no cases of cement extravasation. No instances of mechanical hardware failure were recorded. Fenestrated screws confer similar risk profiles as nonfenestrated screws for posterior spinal fusion in patients with spinal cancer. However, fenestrated screws may affect operative time, radiation exposure, and impose risk of cement extravasation. Cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screws may be a viable option for patients with poor bone quality associated with metastatic disease without significantly increased rates of surgical complications. 3.

Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering: A Nonfusion Surgery for Idiopathic Scoliosis

Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is a spinal deformity of unknown etiology, and it is the most common spinal deformity in the pediatric population. The treatment of IS is multifactorial but is determined in part by curve magnitude and remaining skeletal growth. The goal of nonoperative treatment of IS is to prevent curve progression during growth, but if curve magnitude continues to progress, the goal of operative treatment becomes curve correction and stabilization. The current gold standard of treatment for progressive IS is a posterior spinal fusion; however, anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) is a newer surgical technique which has emerged as a nonfusion option for the treatment of progressive IS in skeletally immature patients. Many recent clinical studies have garnered evidence that AVBT may be a viable treatment option and an alternative to posterior spinal fusion in patients with remaining growth.

Spinal Fusion with Sacral Alar Iliac Pelvic Fixation in Severe Neuromuscular Scoliosis.

We demonstrate how to perform posterior spinal fusion with SAI pelvic fixation in a patient with cerebral palsy. In correcting the scoliosis, we utilize the segmental 3-dimensional technique, which includes compression, distraction, transverse approximation to 1 rod at a time, and derotation around 2 rods. We also demonstrate SAI pelvic fixation with identification of the screw starting point on the lateral-caudal border of the first sacral foramen and trajectory toward the anterior inferior iliac spine. Nonoperative alternatives include bracing, trunk support, contouring of sitting surfaces (such as wheelchairs), and physical therapy to slow curve progression during growth periods and delay the need for surgical treatment3,4. Decision-making is shared with the family following education about the risks and benefits. Families who are satisfied with the function of the child at baseline should not be persuaded into pursuing surgical treatment. Neuromuscular scoliosis can include difficulty sitting secondary to increased pelvic obliquity, along with poor trunk control and balance. Surgical intervention is considered in patients with curves exceeding approximately 50°, as these curves will often continue to progress even after maturity5. In patients with neuromuscular scoliosis, indications for pelvic fixation include pelvic obliquity of >15°, poor control of the trunk as indicated by lack of independent sitting or standing, and location of the apex of the curve in the lumbar spine. SAI screws are utilized as a low-profile option for pelvic fixation to avoid implant prominence and an increased risk of skin breakdown and infection, which are associated with traditional sacroiliac screws2,6. Miyanji et al. reported quality outcomes in patients with cerebral palsy and Gross Motor Function Classification Scores of ≥41. In that study, caregivers completed a validated disease-specific questionnaire grading the health-related quality of life of the patient preoperatively and at 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively. Complication data were prospectively collected for each patient and preoperative outcome scores were compared at each of the postoperative time points. Survey scores at 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively were significantly higher compared with baseline preoperative values.Sponseller et al. compared the 2-year postoperative radiographic parameters of 32 pediatric patients who underwent SAI fixation and 27 patients who underwent pelvic fixation with the sacroiliac technique2. Among patients who underwent SAI fixation, the mean correction of pelvic obliquity was 20° ± 11° (70% correction) and the mean Cobb angle 42° ± 25° (67%). Among patients who underwent pelvic fixation with the sacroiliac technique, those values were 10° ± 9° (50%) and 46° ± 16° (60%), respectively. SAI screws provided significantly better pelvic obliquity correction (p = 0.002) but no difference in Cobb correction or complications compared with other traditional techniques. Family discussion prior to surgical treatment is paramount.Perform preoperative neurologic examination7.Examine the cranium carefully for a ventriculoperitoneal shunt or prior cranial reconstruction prior to cranial traction.Transcranial neuromonitoring may be useful. Use descending neural motor evoked potentials when no signals from transcranial monitoring are obtained8.Sink the SAI screw until it lines up with the S1 screw. Bury the SAI screw so it is not prominent.Measure rods longer in order to ensure adequate length for compression and distraction in correction of the pelvic obliquity.Use a T-square to verify adequate spinopelvic alignment9.Postoperatively, the use of incisional vacuum-assisted closure can decrease soiling in these patients. SAI = Sacral alar iliacCP = Cerebral palsyAIS = Adolescent idiopathic scoliosisSMA = Spinal muscular atrophyIONM = Intraoperative neuromonitoringGMFCS = Gross Motor Functional Classification SystemDNMEP = Descending neural motor evoked potentialTXA = Tranexamic acidFFP = Fresh frozen plasmaASIS = Anterior superior iliac spineAIIS = Anterior inferior iliac spinePJK = Proximal junctional kyphosis.

Intra-operative fluid restriction and post-operative pain management bundle associated with reduction in length of stay and opioid exposure in adolescent posterior spinal fusion patients

Intra-operative fluid restriction and post-operative pain management bundle associated with reduction in length of stay and opioid exposure in adolescent posterior spinal fusion patients

Dexamethasone Administration Decreases Opioid Usage After Posterior Spinal Fusion in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Commentary on article by Nicholas D. Fletcher, MD, et al.: "Postoperative Dexamethasone Following Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis".

Dexamethasone Administration Decreases Opioid Usage After Posterior Spinal Fusion in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Commentary on article by Nicholas D. Fletcher, MD, et al.: "Postoperative Dexamethasone Following Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis".

Depression and anxiety as emerging contributors to increased hospital length of stay after posterior spinal fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Background ContextThe diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) amongst adolescents is rising worldwide. Rates of these disorders are higher in those with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. PurposeTo elucidate whether or not depression and anxiety are associated with increased length of stay and total cost after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Study Design/Setting, Patient SampleThis study utilized the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) to obtain a sample of n = 564 in the depression and anxiety cohort and n = 5,185 in the cohort without concomitant diagnosis of depression and anxiety. Outcome MeasuresLength of stay and total cost after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. MethodsThe Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with either the concomitant diagnosis of major depressive disorder or generalized anxiety disorder. Comorbidities and other confounders were controlled for using multivariate regression analysis to determine the effect of having either mood disorder on cost and length of stay (LOS) after PSF. ResultsWe determined that after controlling for confounding variables and comorbidities through multivariate regression analysis, patients with either depression or anxiety had increased odds ratios for increased LOS but not for cost. ConclusionsThe emergence of adolescent MDD and GAD may have significant implications on the inpatient stay for patients undergoing major surgery, including PSF for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Opioid prescribing practices after posterior spinal arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Retrospective review. To identify national trends in postoperative opioid prescribing practices after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Opioids are an important component of pain management after PSF for AIS. Given the national opioid crisis, it is important to understand opioid prescribing practices in these patients. Using a commercial prescription drug claims database, we identified AIS patients who underwent PSF from 2010 to 2016 and who were prescribed opioids postoperatively. An initial prescription at hospital discharge of ≥ 90 morphine milligram equivalents daily (MMED) was used to identify patients at risk of overdose according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. Prescriptions for skeletal muscle relaxants were also identified. α = 0.05. We included 3762 patients (75% female) with a mean (± standard deviation) age of 15 ± 2.1years. 56% of patients filled only 1 opioid prescription after discharge, and 44% had ≥ 1 refills. 91% of opioid prescriptions were for hydrocodone (median strength, 43 MMED; mean strength, 65 ± 270 MMED) or oxycodone formulations (median strength, 60 MMED; mean strength, 79 ± 174 MMED). 82% of prescriptions complied with CDC guidelines (< 90 MMED). Overall, 612 patients (16%) filled ≥ 1 prescription for skeletal muscle relaxants, the most common being cyclobenzaprine (45%) and methocarbamol (29%). The percentage of patients filling > 1 prescription declined from 54% in 2010 to 31% in 2016 (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients receiving prescriptions for ≥ 90 MMED was highest in the West (29%) and lowest in the South (16%) (p < 0.001). Most opioid prescriptions after PSF in patients with AIS comply with CDC guidelines. Temporal and geographic variations show an opportunity for standardizing opioid prescribing practices in these patients. III.

Multimodal pain control in adolescent posterior spinal fusion patients: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial to validate the effect of gabapentin on postoperative pain control, opioid use, and patient satisfaction.

Prospective double-blind, randomized controlled trial. The objective of this study was to validate the efficacy of gabapentin as part of a multimodal pain regimen in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial for patients aged 10-19years with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion. Perioperative pain management represents a challenge for patients undergoing surgical correction of adolescent spinal deformity. Gabapentin has been shown to decrease postoperative pain and opioid use after spine surgery, but it has not yet been investigated as part of a multimodal pain regimen intended to decrease the perioperative use of opioids. Fifty patients were randomized to receive gabapentin or placebo pre- and postoperatively in addition to a standardized medication regime including scheduled ketorolac and as-needed acetaminophen, hydromorphone, and oxycodone. Patients were monitored in the pre-, peri-, and postoperative periods for pain levels, medication dosing, side effects, adverse events, hospitalization length of stay, and parent satisfaction. There were statistically significant decreases in early postoperative pain scores and opioid use as well as total postoperative opioid use for the treatment group relative to controls. There were no statistically significant differences in adverse events, medication side effects, or hospitalization length. Parents of patients in both groups were very satisfied with the pain control provided to their children. This randomized controlled trial demonstrates that pre- and postoperative administration of gabapentin as part of a multimodal pain management protocol significantly decreases both opioid use and visual analog pain scales in the first two postoperative days after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Gabapentin should be considered as a standard medication for perioperative pain control in this patient population. Level I.

P105. Opioid prescribing practices following posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Opioid medications are an important component postoperative pain management following posterior spinal fusion in patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). In the face of growing concerns among caregivers, medical providers and policymakers regarding the opioid crisis in the United States, it is important to understand trends in opioid prescribing practices in AIS patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion. PURPOSE Our purpose was to demonstrate that significant regional variations exist in the US opioid prescribing practices after surgical treatment of AIS. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Analysis of a commercial prescription drug database. PATIENT SAMPLE A total of 3,492 patients aged 10 to 21 with AIS who underwent surgical treatment with posterior spinal fusion from 2010 to 2016. OUTCOME MEASURES Our primary outcomes were the quantity and duration of opioid prescription postoperatively. METHODS Patients were included if they had prescription drug coverage and filled at least 1 opioid prescription upon discharge. Patients were excluded for: diagnosis of neuromuscular or congenital scoliosis; preoperative opioid use; and, readmission in the 6-month postoperative period. For each opioid prescription, morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were calculated. RESULTS Mean age of patients was 14±2 years; (75% girls). Fifty-six percent of patients filled a single prescription, while 44% had one or more refills. Ninety-nine percent of patients did not fill opioid prescriptions past 90 days postoperatively, 91% of opioid prescriptions were for either hydrocodone (median strength 43 MME/day) or oxycodone (median strength 60 MME/day) and 81% of all prescriptions complied with CDC guidelines of 90 MME/day was highest in the western US (30% of patients) and lowest in the southern US (16% of patients) (p CONCLUSIONS In the AIS population, significant regional variations exist in opioid prescribing practices for post-discharge pain control. There exists an opportunity for standardizing opioid prescribing practices in management of postoperative AIS patients. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.