Posterior Spinal Fusion Group Research Articles

Minimally invasive surgery versus standard posterior approach in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 2-year follow-up retrospective study.

This is a monocentric retrospective controlled study that compares the safety and efficacy of posterior minimally invasive surgery (MISS) to standard posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). We retrospectively collected 111 patients with Lenke type 1-6 AIS who were treated with MIS (n = 47) or PSF (n = 64) between February 2019 and January 2021 with a 2-year clinical and radiological follow-up. MIS technique was applied via two midline noncontiguous skin incisions ranging from 3 to 7cm in length, so we obtained the arthrodesis only in the exposed tract, passing the rods below the fascia, avoiding the complete muscular sparing. Values of Cobb angles degrees were collected to study the correction rate of the structural major curve. Postoperative AP direct radiography and preoperative AP direct radiography were compared with the last follow-up examination. Operative time, preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) and second postoperative day Hb, full length of hospitalization, time to achieve verticalization and time to remove the drainage were recorded. NRS medium score was assessed immediately after surgery and during the whole postoperative rehabilitation treatment to estimate pain reduction. Complications were collected postoperatively and throughout the whole follow-up period. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of radiographic and clinical features. The correction rates of the structural curve resulted to be not significantly different between MISS and PSF (64.6 ± 11.7 vs 60.9 ± 13.2, p = 0.1292) as well as for the correction rate of the secondary curve between the two compared techniques (59.1 ± 13.2 vs 59.2 ± 12.4, p = 0.9865). The two groups had comparable operative time (210min vs 215min). The MIS group had a significantly lower reduction of postoperative Hb in comparison with PSF group (2.8 ± 1.3mg/dl vs 4.3 ± 1.5mg/dl, p < 0.0001). The postoperative NRS score was lower in MIS group (1.9 ± 0.8 vs 3.3 ± 1.3). PSF group was observed to have a significantly longer period of hospitalization than MIS (5.2 ± 1.4days vs 6.3 ± 2.9days, p = 0.206). Complications were more frequent in PSF group rather than in MFS group. MISS is a safe and capable alternative to PSF for AIS patients with curves < 70°, with analogue capacity of scoliosis correction and same operative time and with advantages in blood loss, length of stay and postoperative pain.

Double major curvature treated with vertebral body tethering of both curves: how do outcomes compare to posterior spinal fusion?

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion alternative to posterior spinal fusion (PSF). There have been few reports on VBT of two curvatures. We aim to compare the radiographic outcomes between VBT and PSF in patients with double curvatures in which both curves were instrumented. 29 AIS patients matched by Lenke, age (± 2years), triradiate cartilage closure status, major Cobb angle (± 8°), and T5-T12 kyphosis (± 10°). Variables were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Student's t tests, and chi-Square. Clinical success was defined as major curve < 35°. Group baseline demographics were similar. Major thoracic (T) curve types had significantly better major (VBT 51.5 ± 7.9° to 31.6 ± 12.0° [40%] vs. PSF 54.3 ± 7.4° to 17.4 ± 6.5° [68%]; p = 0.0002) and secondary curve correction in the PSF group. 71% of major T VBT patients were clinically successful versus 100% of PSF. Major thoracolumbar (TL) curve types experienced comparable major (VBT 52.3 ± 7.0° to 18.3 ± 11.4° (65%) vs. PSF 53.0 ± 5.2° to 23.8 ± 10.9° (56%); p = 0.2397) and secondary curve correction. 92% of major TL VBT patients were clinically successful versus 75% in the PSF group. There was no difference in T5-12 kyphosis or lumbar lordosis between groups for any curve type. There were 4 patients (13.8%) with major complications in the VBT group compared to 0 (0%) in the PSF. Patients with double major AIS who underwent VBT with major T curve types had less correction than PSF; however, those with major TL curves experienced similar radiographic outcomes regardless of procedure. Complications were greater for VBT.

RETROSPECTIVE MATCHED COMPARISON STUDY ON NON FUSION ANTERIOR SCOLIOSIS CORRECTION (NFASC) VERSUS POSTERIOR SPINAL FUSION (PSF) FOR LENKE 5 ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS (AIS) CURVES IN SKELETALLY MATURE CHILDREN: CLINICO-RADIOLOGICAL OUTCOMES WITH TWO YEARS’ FOLLOW-UP

The current study aims to compare the clinico radiological outcomes between Non-Fusion Anterior Scoliosis (NFASC) Correction and Posterior Spinal Fusion (PSF) for Lenke 5 curves at 2 years follow up.Methods:38 consecutive Lenke 5 AIS patients treated by a single surgeon with NFASC (group A) or PSF (group B) were matched by age, Cobb's angle, and skeletal maturity. Intraoperative blood loss, operative time, LOS, coronal Cobbs, and SRS22 scores at 2 years were compared. Flexibility was assessed by modified Schober's test. Continuous variables were compared using student t-tests and categorical variables were compared using chi-square.The cohort included 19 patients each in group A and B . Group A had M:F distribution of 1:18 while group B had 2:17. The mean age in group A and group B were 14.8±2.9 and 15.3±3.1 years respectively. The mean follow-up of patients in groups A and B were 24.5±1.8 months and 27.4±2.1 months respectively. Mean pre-op thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) cobbs for group A and group B were 55°±7° and 57.5°±8° respectively. At two years follow up, the cobbs for group A and B were 18.2°±3.6° and 17.6°±3.5° respectively (p=0.09). The average operating time for groups A and B were 169±14.2 mins and 219±20.5 mins respectively (p&lt;0.05). The average blood loss of groups A and B were 105.3±15.4 and 325.3±120.4 respectively (p&lt;0.05). The average number of instrumented vertebra between groups A and B were 6.2 and 8.5 respectively (p&lt;0.05). The average LOS for NFASC and PSF was 3.3±0.9 days and 4.3±1.1 days respectively (p&lt;0.05). No statistically significant difference in SRS 22 score was noted between the two groups. No complications were recorded.Our study shows no significant difference in PSF and NFASC in terms of Cobbs correction and SRS scores, but the NFASC group had significantly reduced blood loss, operative time, and fewer instrumented levels. NFASC is an effective alternative technique to fusion to correct and stabilize Lenke 5 AIS curves with preservation of spinal motion.

Perioperative complications after posterior spinal fusion versus minimally invasive fusionless surgery in neuromuscular scoliosis: a comparative study.

Early-onset scoliosis is a common deformity in neuromuscular disease. When conservative treatment becomes ineffective, several surgical options can be proposed. The most common technique is posterior spinal fusion (PSF) consisting of performing a multiple segmental instrumentation with pedicular screws on the full spine associated with decortication and bone graft. Minimally invasive fusionless surgery (MIFS) is an alternative to correct and fix definitively the spine without graft. The objective of this study was to compare early surgical inpatient period between PSF and MIFS in neuromuscular scoliosis. 140 NMS operated by PSF or MIFS between 2012 and 2017 was retrospectively reviewed. The following data were compared between groups: general characteristics (age, sex, etiology), preoperative preparation (halo traction, noninvasive ventilation or tracheostomy), Cobb angle and pelvic obliquity correction, use of drugs (vasopressor and/or inotropes, expansion fluids, transfusion and volumes), postoperative complications, and need of noninvasive ventilation. 75 patients were managed by PSF with a mean age of 14.3 ± 2.3y and 65 by MIFS with a mean age of 11.8 ± 3y. Average pelvic obliquity and major curve correction were similar postoperatively. Intraoperative blood transfusion was significantly more common in PSF group (OR, 14; 95% CI [6.3-33.0]). Vasopressors were used non-significantly more often in the PSF group and expansion fluids similar in the two groups. PSF group had more overall complications (OR, 4.6; 95% CI [2.3-9.8]), more infections (OR, 3.6; 95% CI [1.5-9.3]) and more hemodynamic complications (OR, 4.1; 95% CI [1.4-15.1]). Average intubation duration was 5days in the PSF and 4days in MIFS (p = 0.05). In this series of neuromuscular patients, the complication rate was reduced in MIFS comparatively to PSF, with lower blood transfusion and less infections.

Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering Compared with Posterior Spinal Fusion for Major Thoracic Curves: A Retrospective Comparison by the Harms Study Group.

Anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) is an alternative to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for the surgical treatment of scoliosis. The present study utilized a large, multicenter database and propensity matching to compare outcomes of AVBT to PSF in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Patients with thoracic idiopathic scoliosis who underwent AVBT with a minimum 2-year follow-up retrospectively underwent 2 methods of propensity-guided matching to PSF patients from an idiopathic scoliosis registry. Radiographic, clinical, and Scoliosis Research Society 22-Item Questionnaire (SRS-22) data were compared preoperatively and at the ≥2-year follow-up. A total of 237 AVBT patients were matched with 237 PSF patients. In the AVBT group, the mean age was 12.1 ± 1.6 years, the mean follow-up was 2.2 ± 0.5 years, 84% of patients were female, and 79% of patients had a Risser sign of 0 or 1, compared with 13.4 ± 1.4 years, 2.3 ± 0.5 years, 84% female, and 43% Risser 0 or 1 in the PSF group. The AVBT group was younger (p < 0.001), had a smaller mean thoracic curve preoperatively (48 ± 9°; range, 30° to 74°; compared with 53 ± 8°; range, 40° to 78° in the PSF group; p < 0.001), and had less initial correction (41% ± 16% correction to 28° ± 9° compared with 70% ± 11% correction to 16° ± 6° in the PSF group; p < 0.001). Thoracic deformity at the time of the latest follow-up was 27° ± 12° (range, 1° to 61°) for AVBT compared with 20° ± 7° (range, 3° to 42°) for PSF (p < 0.001). A total of 76% of AVBT patients had a thoracic curve of <35° at the latest follow-up compared with 97.4% of PSF patients (p < 0.001). A residual curve of >50° was present in 7 AVBT patients (3%), 3 of whom underwent subsequent PSF, and in 0 PSF patients (0%). Forty-six subsequent procedures were performed in 38 AVBT patients (16%), including 17 conversions to PSF and 16 revisions for excessive correction, compared with 4 revision procedures in 3 PSF patients (1.3%; p < 0.01). AVBT patients had lower median preoperative SRS-22 mental-health component scores (p < 0.01) and less improvement in the pain and self-image scores between preoperatively and the ≥2-year follow-up (p < 0.05). In the more strictly matched analysis (n = 108 each), 10% of patients in the AVBT group and 2% of patients in the PSF group required a subsequent surgical procedure. At a mean follow-up of 2.2 years, 76% of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent AVBT had a residual curve of <35° compared with 97.4% of patients who underwent PSF. A total of 16% of cases in the AVBT group required a subsequent surgical procedure compared with 1.3% in the PSF group. An additional 4 cases (1.3%) in the AVBT group had a residual curve of >50° that may require revision or conversion to PSF. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Vertebral body tethering compared to posterior spinal fusion for skeletally immature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients: preliminary results from a matched case–control study

Direct comparisons between vertebral body tethering (VBT) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)are limited. We aimed to evaluate 2-year results of VBT and PSF to report comparative outcomes. 26 prospectively enrolled VBT patients were matched 1:1 by age, gender, Risser sign and major curve magnitude with PSF patients. At a minimum 2-year follow-up, surgical results and radiographic outcomes were reviewed. Operative time, anesthesia time, blood loss, and length of stay were significantly lower in the VBT group (< 0.001, p = 0.003, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). The major curve at 2years was corrected by 46% in the VBT group vs. 66% in the PSF (p = 0.0004). Success following VBT, defined as no fusion surgery and Cobb angle < 35° at the 2-year follow-up, was seen in 20 VBT patients (77%) (p = 0.0003) and correlated with mean Cobb angle of < 35° on 3-month imaging. 12 VBT patients (46%) showed curve improvement over time, and those patients had significantly lower mean Cobb angle on the 3-month radiograph than non-modulators (23° vs 31°, p = 0.014). At 2years, cord breakage occurred in five patients (19%). By 2years, three VBT patients developed complications (2 pleural effusion and 1 overcorrection needing return to OR). In contrast to PSF, growth continued at T1-T12 (mean 13mm) and over the instrumented levels (mean 10mm) following VBT, compared to no growth over instrumented segments in the fusion cohort (p = 0.011, p = 0.0001). In Sanders stages 3 and 4 patients treated in the USA, Cobb angle < 35° on 3-month imaging was associated with success at the 2-year follow-up. Curve correction was superior in the PSF group with 96% achieving curve correction to < 35° vs. 77% of the VBT patients. Cord breakage was noted in 19% of VBT patients at the 2-year follow-up. Three patients developed complications in both the VBT and PSF cohorts. Level II (prospective study with matched retrospective comparison group).

Anterior versus posterior approach in Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of long-term follow-up outcomes.

BackgroundAfter surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), doctors should not only focus on the short-term surgical effect, but also pay special attention to whether the patients can live normally in the long-term. This work compared the long-term effects of thoracoscopy-assisted anterior spinal fusion (ASF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in AIS.MethodsTwenty-two patients underwent thoracoscopy-assisted ASF, and twenty-three patients underwent PSF from 2004 to 2009 were involved , including 14 males and 31 females with an average age of 14.8±2.6 years, and all patients suffered from only Lenke type 1 AIS. The mean follow-up time was 102 months, the radiographic parameters and operation time, hospitalization time, fusion segments and estimated blood loss were evaluated. Comparisons between groups were made such as Cobb’s angle, thoracic kyphosis, the instrumented levels, curve correction, preoperative parameters, SF-36/SRS-22 questionnaire scores, and pulmonary function.ResultsThere was no significant difference in age, gender, Risser sign and follow-up period between two groups. The instrumentation level had an average of 6 in the thoracoscopy-assisted ASF group and 9.7 in the PSF group (P<0.001). The average correction rate of the main curve was 67.4% in ASF group versus 79.2% in PSF group (P>0.05). The postoperative thoracic kyphosis was 16.2°±3.9° in ASF group and 25.6°±4.4° in PSF group (P=0.023). Patients had momentous advancement in self-image, vitality and mental health in the SRS-22 and SF-36 questionnaires. Compared to preoperatively, the pulmonary function of both groups was satisfactorily improved at the final follow-up.ConclusionsSince there was no statistically significant difference in the general conditions of the two groups selected for this study, so we finally concluded that thoracoscopy-assisted ASF had a satisfactory correction rate, famous long-term radiography outcomes and desirable pulmonary function results. However, compared to PSF, it has a longer operation time, a more complicated surgical procedure and a weaker three-dimensional correction effect, and PSF has affirmative long-term outcomes, fewer complications, and satisfactory sagittal balance, all of which make PSF the standard operation to treat AIS.

S2-Alar-iliac screw fixation for paediatric neuromuscular scoliosis: Preliminary results after two years

BackgroundCorrecting pelvic obliquity is among the main goals of surgery for neuromuscular scoliosis. Spino-pelvic fixation must be stable and capable of withstanding the considerable mechanical forces applied at the lumbo-sacral junction. Selection of the best anchoring option is therefore crucial. S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws, which are used in adults, are less often chosen in the French paediatric spinal-surgery community. The objective of this study was to report our preliminary experience with S2AI screws used in the treatment of paediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis. HypothesisPelvic anchoring by means of S2AI screws is reliable and technically feasible in non-ambulatory children with neuromuscular scoliosis. Materials and methodsConsecutive non-ambulatory patients who underwent scoliosis surgery with S2AI screw fixation to the pelvis between 2016 and 2018 were retrospectively included. The surgical procedure consisted in either posterior spinal fusion (PSF) or magnetic growing rod (MGR) implantation. In all patients, radiographs were obtained before surgery, within 3 months after surgery, and at last follow-up; and low-dose computed tomography (CT) was performed before and after surgery. ResultsWe included 25 patients with a mean age of 13.8±4.0 years, 18 managed by PSF and 7 by MGRs. Screw diameters ranged from 7.5 to 9.5mm and all screws were at least 60mm in length. The diameters and lengths were the same on both sides in 16 (89%) patients in the PSF group and in all patients in the MGR group. At last follow-up after a mean of 35.5±3.0 months, pelvic obliquity was corrected in all 23 patients with this abnormality before surgery. Complications consisted of lateral cortical screw breakthrough in 8 (32% of screws) patients and screw malposition in 2 (8% of screws) patients. No clinically significant complications related to the fixation material were recorded. DiscussionThe results of our study demonstrate the feasibility of S2AI screw fixation in paediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis. Pelvic asymmetry and dysmorphism do not contra-indicate the procedure but must be evaluated before surgery. Further work is needed to assess the potential long-term consequences on pain and growth of screw passage through the sacro-iliac joints. Level of evidenceIV, retrospective study.

Efficacy of lateral lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior spinal fusion compared with three-column osteotomy for adult spinal deformity with severe lumbar sagittal deformity.

The clinical and radiological results of adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with a severe lumbar sagittal deformity undergoing multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) + posterior spinal fusion (PSF) were compared to patients undergoing three-column osteotomy (3CO). We defined severe lumbar sagittal deformity as fulcrum backward bending (FBB) pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) ≧ 20 degrees. A total of twenty-five patients with an ASD were enrolled between 2013 and 2018. Fifteen patients were in the LLIF + PSF group, and ten patients were in the 3CO group. We evaluated patient demographics, clinical outcomes, and radiographic parameters such as the Cobb angle and spinopelvic parameters from standing X-ray films in each group. The LLIF + PSF group had a significantly shorter follow-up time than the 3CO group. Postoperatively, the LLIF + PSF group had significantly lower PI-LL and a shorter sagittal vertical axis than the 3CO group. Postoperative PI-LL changes in the LLIF + PSF group were significantly smaller than those in the 3CO group. There were no differences in other patient demographics, radiographic parameters, or clinical outcomes between the groups. Multilevel LLIF + PSF improved the PI-LL and SVA more than did 3CO for ASD patients with severe lumbar sagittal deformity. This indicated that the multilevel LLIF with open PSF can provide good clinical outcomes even in cases with severe lumbar sagittal deformity such as large FBB PI-LL in which 3CO techniques usually are needed.

Effect of adjunct thoracoplasty on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis patients' 3D back contour.

The aims of this study were to evaluate the effect of a thoracoplasty procedure in addition to a posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation on an Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patient's 3D back contour as measured by surface topography. We performed a retrospective review to identify patients who were treated with posterior spinal fusion with spinal instrumentation and those who were treated with an additional thoracoplasty procedure. We analyzed changes in surface topography measurements between these two groups using t-test and ANCOVA statistical analyses. Although there were no statistically significant differences in 11 of 12 variables, thoracoplasty-posterior spinal fusion (n=10) group had a mean 6.6 unit reduction in trunk asymmetry while the posterior spinal fusion group (n=26) had a mean 22.8 unit reduction in trunk asymmetry (p-value<0.05). The posterior spinal fusion group and thoracoplasty-posterior spinal fusion group were not shown to have clinically significant differences in 3D back contour correction. An additional thoracoplasty procedure does not provide better correction in the transverse plane and in fact had a smaller degree of trunk asymmetry correction. This supports the current trends of decreasing use of thoracoplasty in AIS patients to address severe rib hump deformities given concerns for decreased post-operative lung function and alternative methods of vertebral body derotation, such as thoracic pedicle screws.

The Incidence of Adding-On or Distal Junctional Kyphosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated by Anterior Spinal Fusion to L3 Was Significantly Higher Than by Posterior Spinal Fusion to L3.

ObjectiveTo compare and identify risk factors for distal adding-on (AO) or distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated by anterior- (ASF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) to L3. MethodsAIS patients undergoing ASF versus PSF to L3 from 2000–2010 were analyzed. Distal AO and DJK were deemed poor radiographic results. New stable (SV) and neutral vertebra (NV) scores were defined for this study. The total stability (TS) score was the sum of the SV and NV scores. ResultsTwenty of 42 (ASF group: 47.6%) and 8 of 72 patients (PSF group: 11.1%) showed poor radiographic outcome. Fused vertebrae, correction rate of main curve, coronal reduction rate of L3 were significantly higher in PSF group. Multiple logistic regression results indicated that preoperative SV-3 at L3 in standing and side benders (odds ratio [OR], 2.7 and 3.7, respectively), TS score -5, -6 at L3 (OR, 4.9), rigid disc at L3–4 (OR, 3.7), lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) rotation > 15° (OR, 3.3), LIV deviation > 2 cm from center sacral vertical line (OR, 3.1) and ASF (OR, 13.4; p<0.001) were independent predictive factors. There was significant improvement of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 average scores only in PSF group. Furthermore, the ultimate scores of PSF group were significantly superior to ASF group. ConclusionThe prevalence of AO or DJK at ultimate follow-up for AIS with LIV at L3 was significantly higher in ASF group. Ultimate SRS-22 scores were significantly better in PSF group.

Comparison of clinical and functional outcomes of vertebral body tethering to posterior spinal fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and evaluation of quality of life: preliminary results.

This preliminary study was aimed to present the results of the comparison of clinical and functional outcomes of vertebral body tethering (VBT) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for the first time in the literature. 21 thoracolumbar (T5-L3) VBT patients (VBT group); and 22 age-gender-fusion level and minimum follow-up duration matched thoracolumbar (T3-L3) PSF patients (PSF group) were enrolled. Average FU duration of group 1 and 2 were 37.1/37.8months (p = 0.33). Patients clinical data together with SRS-22 scores and SF-36 scores were compared. A retrospective, comparative study was undertaken. VBT group was detected to have superior lumbar range of motion; superior anterior-lateral lumbar bending flexibility; superior flexor and extensor endurances of trunk, and superior average motor strength of trunk muscles with high statistical significance. VBT group was also detected to have superior scores regarding life quality, including better average total SRS-22 and better average SF-36 MCS/PCS scores with also high statistical significance. This study for the first time in the literature concluded, that in skeletally immature patients with AIS, VBT as a result of the utilization of growth modulation was able to yield significantly superior lumbar range of motion, lumbar anterior and lateral flexibility, trunk flexor-extensor endurance and trunk motor strength as compared to patients who underwent fusion. By yielding significantly superior SRS-22 and SF-36 scores, VBT was detected to provide better life quality and patient satisfaction than fusion. This study concluded hereby, that by applying VBT, spinal motion could be preserved and complications of fusion could be avoided.

Comparison of Pulmonary Function After Selective Anterior Versus Posterior Fusion for the Correction of Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Study Design:Retrospective multicenter study.Objectives:To compare the selective anterior spinal fusion (ASF) versus posterior spinal fusion (PSF) on postoperative pulmonary function testing (PFT) whether thoracotomy with separation of the diaphragm by anterior approach influences the PFT in thoracolumbar and lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).Methods:A multicenter series of AIS patients who underwent selective spinal fusion were retrospectively reviewed. Seventy-nine female patients were included (mean 15.8 years). There were 35 patients in the ASF group and 44 patients in the PSF group. Patient demographics, radiographic measurements, and PFT data from preoperative to 2-year follow-up were analyzed.Results:Preoperatively, there were no significant differences in PFTs between the groups. The ASF group patients were more likely to undergo shorter fusions (4.5 instrumented vertebral levels) than those in the PSF group (5.2 levels). At 2-year follow-up, forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in ASF group were statistically lower than those in PSF group. When comparing preoperative and 2-year changes on each procedure, only %FVC showed significant difference in ASF while FVC, FEV1, and %FEV1 did not. Meanwhile, the ASF group showed a significant decrease in FVC at 6 and 12 months compared to preoperative values. In PSF group, there was a decrease at 6 months, returned to preoperative value at 1-year follow-up.Conclusions:Pulmonary function after ASF and PSF was similar at 2 years; however, anterior group did not return to the baseline at 6 months and 1 year suggesting anterior approach may affect early postoperative pulmonary function.

Anterior Spinal Fusion and Posterior Spinal Fusion Both Effectively Treat Lenke Type 5 Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Multicenter Study*

Study DesignRetrospective cohort study. ObjectiveRetrospective comparison of radiographic and clinical outcomes between anterior spinal fusion (ASF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in surgical treatment of Lenke 5 curves. Summary of Background DataASF and PSF are used for treatment of Lenke 5 curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Currently, no consensus exists for optimal surgical treatment of Lenke 5 curves. MethodsPatients with Lenke 5 curves treated with either ASF or PSF were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter database and then retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, perioperative measures, radiographic data, and SRS-22R scores were collected and compared for statistical significance. ResultsA total of 149 patients were included in the study; 51 underwent PSF and 98 underwent ASF. There was no difference in demographics between groups. The PSF group was fused one level longer than the ASF group (5.9 levels PSF, 4.6 levels ASF, p < .0001). The PSF group had shorter operative times (223 minutes PSF, 297 minutes ASF; p < .0001) and a higher proportion of patients who received a postoperative blood transfusion (45% vs. 5%, p < .0001). PSF patients had longer hospital stays (6.1d PSF vs. 5d ASF, p = .031). The ASF group had larger preoperative major curve (48.2° ASF, 44.2° PSF; p < .01). Coronal balance, thoracolumbar/lumbar Cobb angle, shoulder height, trunk shift, and overall sagittal balance were not different between groups at two-year follow-up. Curve correction at two-year follow-up was similar between groups (66% ASF vs. 62% PSF). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes or complication rates between groups. ConclusionThere is no difference in radiographic or clinical outcomes in patients treated with ASF or PSF for Lenke 5 curves. ASF may save a fusion level, but has longer operative time than PSF. Ultimately, the risks and benefits of each approach merit consideration by surgeon and patient. Level of EvidenceLevel II.

Perioperative and Delayed Major Complications Following Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Reporting accurate surgical complication rates to patients and their families is important in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). In this study, we report the rate of major complications following the surgical treatment of AIS both in the perioperative period and among patients with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. We reviewed the prospectively collected data of a multicenter registry of patients who underwent surgical treatment of AIS during the period of 1995 to 2014 in order to identify all complications. A complication was defined as "major" if it resulted in reoperation or in spinal cord or nerve root injury, or was life-threatening. A total of 3,582 patients with preoperative and early postoperative data (4 to 6 weeks of follow-up) were included. A subset of 2,220 patients with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up comprised the cohort for delayed complications. Overall complication rates were calculated, as was the percentage of complications according to the year of the index surgery and type of surgical approach. The mean age of the 3,582 patients at the time of surgery was 14.8 ± 2.2 years. The average major curve magnitude was 56° ± 13° for thoracic curves and 51° ± 11° for lumbar. In 365 patients, anterior spinal fusion (ASF) with instrumentation was performed, and in 3,217 patients, posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with instrumentation was performed; 142 patients in the PSF group underwent concomitant anterior release. There were 192 major complications, with 93 (2.6%) occurring perioperatively. Perioperative complications included wound-related (1.0% of the patients), neurologic (0.5%), pulmonary (0.4%), instrumentation-related (0.4%), and gastrointestinal (0.2%) complications. One patient died. The mean annual perioperative major complication rate based on the year of surgery ranged from 0% to 10.5%. The complication rate by surgical approach was 3.0% for ASF and 2.6% for PSF (2.4% for PSF only and 5.6% for PSF with anterior release). The major complication rate for the 2,220 patients with at least 2 years of follow-up was 4.1%; all but 1 had a reoperation (4.1%). The majority of these major complications were wound and instrumentation-related (1.9% and 0.8%, respectively). After surgery for AIS, a 2.6% rate of perioperative major complications and a 4.1% rate of major complications at 2 or more years after surgery can be anticipated. The complication rate decreased over the period of study. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Complications and Radiographic Outcomes of Posterior Spinal Fusion and Observation in Patients Who Have Undergone Distraction-Based Treatment for Early Onset Scoliosis

Study DesignRetrospective, multicenter. ObjectivesTo compare surgical and radiographic outcomes of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients who had stopped lengthening for ≥2 years without additional surgery to those who had posterior spinal fusion (PSF) at the end of lengthening. Summary of Background DataBecause of the risk of significant complications with PSF in patients with EOS, “watchful waiting” at the end of lengthening has been suggested as a viable alternative. MethodsRetrospective review of the Children's Spine Study Group (CSSG) database identified all patients with the diagnosis of EOS who had distraction-based treatment, who were ≥2 years from their last distraction, and who had complete records. Radiographic measures were obtained by a single unbiased trained observer. Treatment outcomes including curve correction, height and length gain, as well as complications were recorded. ResultsThe 37 patients (21 females and 16 males) had a mean age of 7.2 years; 12 were in the observation (OBS) and 25 in the PSF group. The PSF group had a slightly greater coronal Cobb angle and maximal kyphosis at the end of distraction. Although there was some correction of the coronal Cobb angle and maximal kyphosis following PSF, the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant at final follow-up. At final follow-up, the OBS group obtained 88% of T1–T12 height and 90% of T1–L1 length of that obtained by the PSF group. Twenty-six complications occurred in 15 patients, all in the PSF group. ConclusionsObservation may be a viable alternative to PSF after distraction-based treatment in a subset of patients with EOS. PSF was found to provide no significant curve correction or gains in spine height and length compared to observation and carries a significant risk of complications. Level of EvidenceLevel III, therapeutic.

Radiological Outcomes in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients More Than 22 Years After Treatment

Study DesignLongitudinal cohort. ObjectivesTo evaluate the long-term radiologic outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients more than 22 years after treatment. Summary of Background DataAlthough treatment for AIS is prophylactic and is aimed at preventing curve progression, very few studies report long-term outcomes of treatment. MethodsAIS patients treated with Boston brace or posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with Harrington–dorso-transverse traction (DTT) instrumentation from 1983 to 1990 were requested to return to clinic. Subsequently, 36-inch standing radiographs were obtained after patient consent. Cobb angles were compared with pretreatment and immediate posttreatment radiographs. Any evidence of adjacent-level disease or local kyphosis was also noted. ResultsOne hundred fifty-nine (78%) of 219 patients were available for follow-up, 66 braced and 93 surgical. There were 85 females with an average age at surgery of 14.3 years and an average age at follow-up of 37.6 years. The mean length of follow-up was 24.5 years (range, 22–30 years). There was a statistically significant curve progression of 2.9° in the PSF group. There was a greater degree of curve progression in the braced group (5.5°), but this was not statistically significant. Proximal segment degeneration was seen in 8 (5%), 2 in the brace cohort and 6 in the PSF cohort. Distal segment degeneration was seen in 26 (16%) patients, 4 treated with brace and 22 treated with PSF. No patient developed proximal junction kyphosis. Three patients in the PSF cohort required additional surgery for distal adding-on. Four patients had a noncontiguous L5–S1 fusion, three from the PSF cohort and one from the braced cohort. ConclusionIn this cohort with an average follow-up of 24.5 years, with 78% available for follow-up, both the braced and surgically treated patients had a very small degree of curve progression, with a small incidence of distal segment degeneration and reoperation. Level of EvidenceIII.

Health-related quality-of-life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients 25years after treatment.

BackgroundSince 1962 to the mid eighties the Harrington Rod instrumentation was the Golden standard for surgical treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). The Boston braces were introduced in the 1970´s and are still used as a conservative treatment, for curves less than 40°. Very few long-term studies exists, focusing on the health related quality of life. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term health related outcome, in a cohort of AIS patients, treated 25 years ago.Method219 consecutive patients treated with Boston brace (Brace) or posterior spinal fusion (PSF) using Harrington- DDT instrumentation between 1983 and 1990 at Rigshospitalet Copenhagen, were invited to participate in a long-term evaluation study. A validated Danish version of the Scoliosis Research Society 22R (SRS22R) and Short Form-36 (SF36v1) were administrated to the patients two weeks before the clinical and radiological examination.Results159 (72,6 %) patients participated in the clinical follow up and questionnaires, 11 patients participated only in the questionnaires, 8 emigrated, 4 were excluded due to progressive neurological disease and 2 were deceased. The total follow up was 170 patients (83 %), and the average follow up was 24.5 years (22–30 years).SRS22R domain scores were within the range described as normal for the general population with no statistical difference between the groups except in the Satisfaction domain, where the PSF group had better scores than the braced group.The SF36 PCS and MCS scores in both AIS cohorts were similar to the scores for the general population.ConclusionHRQOLs, as measured by the SRS22R and SF-36, of adult AIS patients treated with Boston brace or PSF during adolescence were similar to the general population. No clinical progression of the deformity has been detected during the 25-year follow up period. The PSF group had a small but statistically significant higher score in the Satisfaction domain compared to the braced group.Trial registrationS-20110025 Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark.

Preoperative Variables Predicting Massive Blood Loss During Surgical Management of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Background: Massive blood loss is one of the most important concerns in scoliosis surgery. There are some factors suggested to predict the massive blood loss in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), however, their predictive value remained unclear. Objectives: The current study aimed to investigate whether preoperative variables can predict perioperative massive blood loss in patients with AIS. Patients and Methods: There were 60 patients with AIS who underwent surgical treatment in the current retrospective study. Posterior spinal fusion (PSF) was performed on 36 patients and PSF and anterior spinal fusion (ASF) for the other 24. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was calculated intraoperative. The correlation between preoperative radiographic and demographic variables with EBL was investigated. Results: Among the variables, only AVB-R ratio positively correlated with the amount of intraoperative blood transfusion (r = 0.28; P = 0.03). Also, preoperative lateral rib hump positively correlated with blood loss in the PSF group (r = 0.39; P < 0.05). Also, the classification of the scoliosis did not affect the amount of blood loss and the number of transfused units. Conclusions: The preoperative lateral rib hump is an important factor positively correlated with the EBL.

Anterior Dual Rod Versus Posterior Pedicle Fixation Surgery for the Surgical Treatment in Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Multicenter, Matched Case Analysis of 42 Patients

Study DesignMulticenter matched case analysis. ObjectiveCompare patients with Lenke 5C scoliosis surgically treated with anterior spinal fusion with dual rod instrumentation and anterior column support versus posterior release and pedicle screw instrumentation. Summary of Background DataTreatment of single, structural, lumbar and thoracolumbar curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has been the subject of some debate. Previous papers directly comparing these approaches are problematic because of heterogeneity of the groups, nonrandomized protocols, and surgeon bias and variation of instrumentation (upper instrumented vertebrae and lower instrumented vertebrae) in relation to the defined Cobb angle (upper end vertebra and lower end vertebrae). This report sought to remedy these flaws by analyzing a database of Lenke 5C AIS and performing matched cases. MethodsWe analyzed 96 patients with Lenke 5C AIS curves based on radiographic and clinical data at 3 institutions, surgically treated between 2001 and 2005 with minimum 2-year follow-up. Case matched criteria (age within 1 year, sex, curve within 5°, lower end vertebrae, and lower instrumented vertebrae) yielded 21 matched patient pairs. We evaluated and compared multiple clinical and radiographic parameters. ResultsWe observed no significant statistical differences between groups in any preoperative clinical or radiographic parameters. At final follow-up, the major curve measured 8° (83%) in the posterior spinal fusion group, compared with 13° (72%) in the anterior spinal fusion group (p = .002). Estimated blood loss was similar in both groups. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the posterior spinal fusion group. There were no differences in radiographic complications, such as proximal junctional kyphosis. ConclusionsAt a minimum of 2 years' follow-up in a multicenter, matched case analysis, adolescents with Lenke 5C curves demonstrated statistically significantly better curve correction and shorter hospital stays when treated with a posterior release with pedicle screw instrumented fusion compared with an anterior instrumented fusion with dual rods for similar patient populations.