Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty Research Articles

"Take It One Dilation at a Time": Caregiver Perspectives of Postoperative Anal Dilations in Pediatric Patients with Colorectal Conditions.

Postoperative anal dilations (PAD) are the standard of care for patients after a posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) for anorectal malformation (ARM) or a transanal pull-through (TP) procedure for Hirschsprung disease (HD). This study assessed the psychosocial impact of PAD among caregivers of children with ARM or HD, which may inform postoperative care strategies. Caregivers of patients with ARM and HD who underwent PSARP or TP within five years participated in the online survey. Questions included demographics, patient and caregiver experiences with PAD, and baseline psychosocial functioning. Quantitative results were reported descriptively, while qualitative responses were summarized as major themes. The survey indicated a response rate of 26% caregivers, with most being female (91%) and biological mothers (85%). Patients were mostly male (65%), born with ARM (74%), and were five months old on average when PAD began. Caregivers reported that during PAD, children experienced distress (56%), pain (44%), and fear (41%), while a third noted no negative reactions. Over time, their child's ability to cope with PAD got easier (38%) or stayed the same (41%). Caregivers reported worry/anxiety (88%), guilt (71%), stress (62%), and frustration (35%), noting that additional coping strategies to manage the emotional and logistical challenges of daily PAD would be helpful. Although PAD is necessary, it can be highly stressful for the patients and their caregivers. Key findings emphasized the need for additional coping strategies and highlighted the importance of integrating psychosocial support into the postoperative care regimen.

Comparison of postoperative urinary complications in laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty versus posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for anorectal malformation with rectourethral fistula.

Long-term urinary outcomes after anorectal malformation (ARM) repair are affected by surgical approach and sacral anomalies. This study aimed to compare laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) in terms of urinary complications. Between 2001 and 2022, 45 patients were treated with LAARP or PSARP. The rectourethral fistula and inflow angle between the fistula and rectum was confirmed by preoperative colonography. The incidence of urinary complications and treatment were compared between the two groups. Four patients (14%) had remnant fistula and five patients (17%) had neurogenic bladder dysfunction in LAARP group, while three patients (18%) had urethral injury in PSARP group. All patients with remnant fistula were asymptomatic and followed without treatment. The incidence of remnant fistula improved between earlier decade and later decade. In all cases with urethral injury, suture repair was performed and no postoperative leakage was noted. All five patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction had spine abnormalities that required clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) and two were free from CIC finally. It is important to check inflow angle preoperatively to prevent remnant fistula. For PSARP, meticulous dissection is required when separating fistula from urethra because they create common wall. The most contributing factor to neurogenic bladder is sacral anomalies. Preoperative evaluation and postoperative urinary drainage are important.

Short and Long-Term Outcomes of PSARP versus LAARP and Single versus Staged Repair for Infants with High-Type Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

We aimed to compare among patients with high-type anorectal malformations (ARM): (i) short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) compared to classic posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) and (ii) the results of single-stage versus staged PSARP. Using a defined search strategy, two independent investigators systematically reviewed the English literature. PRISMA guidelines were followed, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3. Of 567 abstracts screened, 7 papers have been included (254 pts; 121 PSARP, 133 LAARP) in the first systematic review and meta-analysis. The length of hospitalization was shortened in LAARP versus PSARP (10.9 versus 14.4 days; p < 0.0001). PSARP and LAARP were comparable in terms of early postoperative complications (28.9% versus 24.7%; p = ns) and rectal prolapse (21.6% versus 17.5%; p = ns). At long-term follow-up, the presence of voluntary bowel movements (74.0% versus 83.5%; p = ns) and the incidence of soiling (45.5% versus 47.6%; p = ns) were similar in both PSARP and LAARP. Six papers (297 pts) were included in the second systematic review, with three comparative studies included in the meta-analysis (247 pts; 117 one-stage, 130 staged procedures). No significant difference in terms of presence of voluntary bowel movements after single-stage versus staged procedures (72.6% versus 67.3%; p = ns) has been detected. LAARP seems to be a safe and effective procedure, showing short- and long-term outcomes similar to PSARP. One-stage PSARP could be a safe alternative to the classic three-stage procedure, even for those infants with high-type ARM. Further and larger comparative studies would be needed to corroborate these partial existing data.

Delayed Complete Colonic Stricture after Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty: Iatrogenic or Inflammatory?

Delayed Complete Colonic Stricture after Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty: Iatrogenic or Inflammatory?

Redo Surgeries in Anorectal Malformations: A Single-center Experience.

Complications following posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) for ARM are well known. In this article, we present our experience of managing five patients who required major redo surgeries for complications resulting from previous attempts to correct ARM. We reviewed all patients who underwent major redo surgeries in our hospital for complications from previous repairs for ARM, from June 2013 to June 2019. Data was obtained from hospital records and analysed. Five patients whose ages ranged from 5 months to 14 years were included in the study. Four were boys and 1 was a girl. All patients had undergone PSARP in other hospitals. The presentations were retained distal bowel causing urinary retention and constipation (n=1), pulled through proximal urethra and bladder neck presenting as passage of urine from neo-anus (n=1), retained common channel (of cloaca) causing a 'H' type configuration (n=1), mispositioned neo-anus (n=1) following a primary PSARP and lastly undivided recto-urethral fistula causing fecaluria (n=1). All of them underwent redo repairs by posterior sagittal approach with documented improvement in their symptoms. Two of them required total bowel management to remain clean. All the complications reported here have been described in literature nevertheless, this report will add to the body of experience. Posterior sagittal approach (PSA) has proved to be very successful technique in correcting these complications.

Analysis of postoperative complications in children treated for moderate to severe anal atresia with laparoscopic versus open surgery: A retrospective study

This study aimed to compare and analyze the postoperative complications and anal function after 3-stage laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) and conventional posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) in the treatment of moderate to severe anal atresia in children. A total of 27 children with moderate to severe anal atresia who underwent conventional PSARP at the Dongguan Children Hospital between 2007 and 2011 were included in the control group, and 34 children with moderate to severe anal atresia who underwent 3-stage LAARP between 2012 and 2016 were included in the observation group. The incidence of postoperative complications and Kelly score of anal function in the 2 groups were statistically analyzed and the efficacy of the 2 procedures compared. The incidence of postoperative complications such as wound infection, anal stenosis, anastomotic leakage, fecal incontinence, and constipation in the LAARP group was lower as compared with the PSARP group, and there was a statistically significant difference (P &lt; .05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications such as rectal prolapse, diarrhea, and recurrent fistula between the LAARP group and the PSARP group (P &gt; .05). The Kelly score of anal function was higher in the LAARP group than in the PSARP group, and the difference was statistically significant (P &lt; .05). Compared to conventional PSARP, laparoscopic surgery for moderate to severe anal atresia in children has less complications, improved anal function, and a clear therapeutic impact.

Treatment Strategy for Currarino Syndrome Complicated With Anorectal Stenosis.

The present study aimed to review the treatment experience and outcomes of Currarino syndrome (CS) complicated with anorectal stenosis to evaluate the current treatment strategies. Seven cases of CS complicated with anorectal stenosis, treated at our hospital between 1998 and 2021, were retrospectively investigated. This is a case series article from a single institution. In six and three cases and one case, the presacral mass was a mature teratoma, meningocele, and lipoma, respectively. Resection of the lesion was performed in all six cases of mature teratoma, and duraplasty was performed before resection in all three cases of meningocele. Moreover, surgery for anorectal stenosis was performed simultaneously in four patients. Surgery was performed for six cases of anorectal stenosis, with the remaining case relieved by dilation using a metal bougie. The surgical methods used were a partial resection with end-to-end anastomosis, anorectal strictureplasty, pull-through, posterior sagittal anorectoplasty, and cutback after mass resection. Pathological analysis of the anorectal stenoses revealed disorganized and rough smooth muscle fibers and the replacement of the stroma by an increased quantity of collagen fibers. The clinical outcomes of CS can be improved by establishing a treatment flow chart and understanding the complicated pathophysiology of the disease.

Perioperative Histologically Controlled Fistula Resection in Patients with Imperforate Anus and Perineal Fistula.

Postoperative constipation (PC) in patients with imperforate anus and perineal fistula (PF) has been reported in up to 60%. Histological studies of PF revealed innervation anomalies which seem to be one of the reasons for PC. Perioperative histologically controlled fistula resection (PHCFR) allows appropriate resection of PF and pull-down normoganglionic rectum at the time of posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP). A total of 665 patients with anorectal malformations underwent surgery between 1991 and 2021. Of these, 364 presented PF; 92 out of them (41 F) were studied. Patients with sacral and spinal cord anomalies, neurological disorders, and cut-back anoplasty were excluded. PSARP was done on all patients. Hematoxylin-eosin staining and NADH Tetrazolium-reductase histochemical method were used. Four and more ganglion cells in the myenteric plexus represented a sufficient length of the resection. The continence was scored according to the modified Krickenbeck scoring system. Final scores ranged from 1 to 7 points. Values are given as median. A total of 65 (70.7%) patients presented an aganglionic segment in PF, and 27 patients presented hypoganglionosis. The median length of the resected fistula was 25 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 20-30). The median total continence score was 7 (IQR: 6-7). Post-op constipation was observed in 6/92 (6.5%) patients. PHCFR diminished PC to 6.5% of patients.

Laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty for anorectal malformation with rectobulbar fistula: A two-center comparative study with posterior sagittal anorectoplasty.

Due to the controversy on the feasibility of laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) for the treatment of the anorectal malformation (ARM) with rectobulbar fistula (RBF), this study aimed to compare the outcomes of LAARP and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) for ARM with RBF. Demographic data, postoperative complications, and bowel function of RBF patients who underwent LAARP and PSARP at 2 medical centers from 2016-2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Eighty-eight children with RBF were enrolled, including 43 in the LAARP group and 45 in the PSARP group. There were no significant differences in the sacral ratio (P = .222) or sacral agenesis (P = .374). Thirty-seven and 38 patients in the LAARP and PSARP groups were followed up for a median of 4.14 years. The postoperative complications were comparable between the groups (P = .624), with no cases of urethral diverticulum. The urination of all cases was normal and no evidence of cyst formation was found on MCU or MRI during the follow-up period. The incidence of rectal prolapse was similar between the 2 groups (9.3% vs 17.8%, P = .247). The groups had equivalent Bowel Function Score (15.29 ± 2.36 vs 15.58 ± 2.88, P = .645), but the LAARP group had better voluntary bowel movement (94.6% vs 84.2%, P = .148) by Krickenbeck classification. The intermediate-term outcomes of LAARP show that the urethral diverticulum was rare by the intraluminal incision of the fistular and the bowel function was comparable to that of PSARP in ARM with rectobulbar fistula. However, LAARP was associated with smaller perineal wounds.

Rectovaginal Fistulas: Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Assisted Pullthrough and Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty

AimCompare the laparoscopic treatment (LT) and the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty treatment (ST) of the rectovaginal fistulas (RvaF) in a single center. We have previously reported feasibility and results of LT in this rare variety of anorectal malformations (ARM) [1–3]. Material and methods19 patients were treated between February 2000 and November 2020. Nine underwent a LT and 10 a ST. Both surgical techniques were previously described. [2][4][5] The distal posterior wall of the vagina was kept intact in the LT. A technical change was introduced in the ST for that purpose. The fistula was treated from the inside of the rectum, avoiding the opening of the distal vagina as described for the treatment of a urethra rectal bulbar fistula in males. Age at operation, associated anomalies, sacral ratio index (SR), complications, urinary continence, presence of spontaneous intestinal movements, constipation, soiling and requirements of bowel management program (BMP) were analyzed. ResultsAssociated anomalies occurred in 17 patients (89.5 %), 63 % of which were urological. Five (26 %) had a SR below 0.4; 4 in the LT group and 1 in the ST group. The mean age at the time of operation was 23.2 (8–59) in ST and 17.6 months (4–32) in LT. Average operative time was 190.4 min for ST (120–334) and 195.8 min (90–270) for LT (p 0.13). One patient in the LT group presented a mild rectal prolapse and 2 a partial wound dehiscence after the ST. Only 15 patients were evaluable for functional results (8 in ST and 7 in LT). Mean follow up was 83 months (12–197). All patients are clean with a bowel management program. Five of the 7 patients undergoing a LT had a bad prognosis (SR < 0,4). Three (43 %) are clean with diet or any treatment, 3 (43 %) using laxatives or enemas and 1 (14 %) with a trans anal irrigation system. Only 1 of the 8 patients in the STgroup had a bad prognosis. Six (40 %) needed a diet; 4 (50 %) laxatives or enemas and 1 (10 %) a cecostomy button for antegrade enemas. ConclusionsPatients with RvaF had a high index of associated anomalies. The difference of operative time was not statistically significative. No differences in functional results between both groups were observed. LT is a valid option to treat RvaF.

Postoperative complications in males with anorectal malformations depending on the surgical approach

BACKGROUND: Anorectal abnormalities occur in 1:1,500 to 1:5,000 live births. There is still no agreement on the best surgical procedure for treating some types of anorectal abnormalities in males. Anorectoplasty could be performed using the posterior sagittal approach and using laparoscopic techniques.&#x0D; AIM: To assess the risk of postoperative complications and determine their specificity in males with anorectal malformations, depending on the surgery approach.&#x0D; MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed. Male patients with anorectal malformations who had surgical correction of anorectal malformation by posterior sagittal (group I) or laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (group II) at the age of up to 1 yr at the N.F. Filatov Childrens City Clinical Hospital from 2008 to 2022. Postoperative and intraoperative problems and the number of surgical interventions that had to be redone to correct issues were noted.&#x0D; RESULTS: Of the 33 patients in group I, 18 (55%) had anorectal malformations with bulbar fistula, 12 (36%) had anorectal malformations without fistula, and three (9%) had a prostatic fistula. Group II included 99 patients, with 53 (54%) having anorectal malformations with prostatic fistula, 30 (30%) having anorectal malformations with bulbar fistula, nine (9%) having anorectal malformations with bladder neck fistula, and seven (7%) having anorectal malformations without a fistula. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications was statistically significantly higher in children after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty than laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty: I, 19 (58%) versus II, 33 (33%); p = 0.014. The number of redo surgical interventions to correct complications did not differ significantly between the studied groups: I, 8 (24%) versus II, 26 (26%); p = 0.819. The incidence of urethral damage was identified with posterior sagittal anorectoplasty compared with laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty: I, 4 (12%) versus II, 0 (0%); p 0.001. We found no differences in postoperative complications between laparoscopic-assisted and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty.&#x0D; CONCLUSIONS: The results define laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty as a viable and promising method that does not have specific postoperative complications if it is technically correctly performed. It is necessary to develop clear criteria for rectum mobilization and the volume of rectourethral fistula dissection during laparoscopic-assisted surgery to reduce the risks of postoperative problems and repeat surgery.

Erudition from primary posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for anorectal malformations over two decades.

Perioperative and early post-operative outcomes of Primary Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (P-PSARP) were evaluated. Retrospective analysis of cases who underwent P-PSARP from 2004 to 2019 was done. Perioperative care, management, complications, voluntary bowel movement, soiling and constipation, graded by Krickenbeck criteria were studied. One hundred fifty six patients (134 girls) underwent P-PSARP at median age of 5months (3months to 14years) in girls and 5(1-10) days in 21 boys. One male cloaca was operated at 5months age. Of 20 boys, 5, 8, 4, 3 had rectobulbar urethral fistula, rectoprostatic urethral fistula, bladder neck fistula and male cloaca. Girls had vestibular fistula, rectovaginal fistula, vulval anus, anterior ectopic anus, pouch perineal fistulae and posterior anus with H type fistula in 114, 7, 6, 5, 1 and 1. Complications included wound infection, excoriation, oedema, mucosal prolapse, anal stricture, anal retraction and mortality in 6, 4, 5, 4, 4, 1 and 1, respectively. 35/155(12 neonates) required postoperative dilatations for 5(1-12) months. At follow-up, 96/114(84.2%) had voluntary bowel movements. 46/155 (29.7%) and 9/155 had constipation and soiling. 32:14:0 had grade 1:2:3 constipation, treated with diet (grade 1) and laxatives (grade 2) respectively. 4:3:2 had grade 1:2:3 soiling for initial 3months, treated with bowel management programme. P-PSARP is feasible, subject to proper case selection and good perioperative care, once learning curve is achieved.

The treatment of congenital recto-vestibular fistula and recto-perineal fistula and effect of the megarectum on defecation.

This study aims to discuss the treatment of congenital recto-vestibular fistula and recto-perineal fistula, and the effect of the megarectum on defecation. Congenital recto-vestibular fistula or recto-perineal fistula is the most common type of anorectal malformation, and surgical methods include posterior sagittal anorectoplasty, anterior sagittal anorectoplasty, and mid-sagittal anorectoplasty, which can be performed at stage one or stage two after the ostomy. In the later stages of a recto-vestibular fistula, constipation is a common complication. Rectal dilatation is frequently associated with constipation, and the effect of rectal dilatation on defecation should be discussed for patients with congenital recto-vestibular or recto-perineal fistula who had rectal dilatation prior to surgery. Rectal dilatation may be one of the causes of constipation for congenital recto-vestibular fistula and recto-perineal fistula. The patients in this study were 67 children with congenital recto-vestibular fistula or recto-perineal fistula treated in our hospital from March 2013 to February 2017. All patients underwent an MRI of the spine and a barium enema. Six patients with myelodysplasia and sacral agenesis were excluded from this study. There were 18 patients with rectal dilatation (ages: 4-month-old to 1 year old, male: 3, female: 15). Seven of them had anterior sagittal anorectoplasty (group A), and 11 had anorectoplasty with dilated rectum resection (group B). Forty-three patients (ages: 3- to 10 months old, male: 6; female: 37) without a dilated rectum underwent anterior sagittal anorectoplasty (group C). All patients were followed up for 1 year to 5 years. Among the 50 patients who had undergone an anoplasty, 5 out of 7 patients with rectal dilatation developed post-operative constipation, and 3 of them had normal defecation after the second resection of the dilated rectum. Only two out of 43 patients without rectal dilatation developed post-operative constipation. One out of 11 patients with rectal dilatation who underwent anoplasty and resection of the dilated rectum developed post-operative constipation. Patients with congenital recto-vestibular fistula or recto-perineal fistula complicated by rectal dilatation are more susceptible to post-operative constipation. Resection of the dilated rectum at the same time can reduce the incidence rate of constipation. A barium enema should be performed pre-operatively for patients with congenital recto-vestibular fistula or recto-perineal fistula. If the dilated rectum is found, it can be resected at the same time.

ANORECTAL MALFORMATION WITH VAGINAL AGENESIS: A CASE REPORT

Vaginal agenesis is characterised by primary amenorrhea in adolescent women and other abnormalities, such as the absence of the uterus. The incidence of vaginal agenesis or distal vaginal atresia associated with anorectal malformations is difficult to estimate. A 5-year-old patient, at birth, immediately cried, and faeces came out through an orifice in the skin under the vagina. Previously, the patient had planned for a posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP), but it was known that the patient did not have a vaginal opening at the time of surgery. The patient was diagnosed with a low-type anorectal malformation, vaginal agenesis, and a sigmoidostomy status. PSARP and vaginoplasty were performed while the patient was 7 years old. Clinical and radiographic examination in the first 3 days of age plays a role in determining the type of anorectal malformation and whether or not a colostomy is necessary. In children, MRI radiology plays a role in the preoperative examination to evaluate the size, morphology, and stage of development of the muscular sphincter. Keywords: anorectal malformations, vaginal agenesis.

Clinical profile, management and post operative outcome in patients with anorectal malformations

Background: Anorectal malformations (ARM) form a very important group of anomalies dealt by pediatric surgeons. Identification of different forms of the anomaly, planning investigation and definitive surgical procedure to attain the final goal of a continent child, remains a difficult task till date. Aim of the study was to study complete clinical profile of the ARM patient, surgical procedure and post operative outcome with special emphasis on continence. Methods: We conducted a study at Geetanjali medical college, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India for clinical profile and management of patients with ARM with assessment of post-operative outcome. All cases of ARM operated from August 2016 to June 2021 were included in the study. All aspects of the anomaly i.e., type, age and sex distribution, associated anomalies, surgical technique used and post op complications were assessed. Evaluation of continence was done by Kelly's scoring system. Results: The 71% patients had staged surgery with posterior sagittal ano-rectoplasty (PSARP) being the most common procedure used (71%). Immediate post op complications were nil. Incontinence was present in 29% patients. Constipation was present in 46% patients. On assessing Kelly's scoring 96% patients had satisfactory score. Postoperative continence was achieved in 70.8% and in 83.3% patients after treatment (bowel management). Conclusions: Meticulous planning and surgical technique with sphincter identification and proper placement of ano-rectum are most important to achieve desired results. Kelly's scoring is important to assess post operative results and plan management for incontinence. With aggressive bowel management it is possible to achieve reasonable continence and quality of life for even those anomalies with poor prognosis.

Abdominoperineal posterior sagittal anorectoplasty without protective colostomy in high arm pouch colon surgery

Background: In high anorectal malformations (ARM), surgical management includes initial colostomy at neonatal period followed by abdominoperineal posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) without a protective colostomy. Aims and Objectives: The aims of this study were as follows: (i) To evaluate whether 2 stage PSARP gives better outcome for high ARM than three stage and (ii) to assess overall stay duration, cost incurred, and complications associated with two stage PSARP. Materials and Methods: A total 30 patients were studied. Fifteen patients with classical abdominoperineal PSARP with protective colostomy (three stages) constituting Group A studied retrospectively and 15 patients were studied in Group B who underwent neonatal colostomy followed by abdominoperineal PSARP without protective colostomy (Two stages). Comparative study was done between the two groups for a better choice of procedure in high ARM patients. Results: In Group A, blood transfusion required was more than Group B. Mean expense incurred in Group A was more than Group B. Complications in Group A occur in eight patients, whereas in Group B, complications occurred in six patients. Conclusion: Stages of high ARM and pouch colon are better alternative to three stages repair in all aspect.

Reoperative Anorectal Procedures in Patients with Anorectal Malformations – Is Bladder Function Affected?

BackgroundAnorectal malformations (ARM) are associated with neurogenic bladder. The traditional surgical ARM repair is a posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP), which is believed to have a minimal effect on bladder dynamics. However, little is known about the effects of reoperative PSARP (rPSARP) on bladder function. We hypothesized that a high rate of bladder dysfunction existed in this cohort. MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of ARM patients undergoing rPSARP at a single institution from 2008 to 2015. Only patients with Urology follow-up were included in our analysis. Data was collected regarding original level of ARM, coexisting spinal anomalies and indications for reoperation. We assessed urodynamic variables and bladder management (voiding, CIC or diverted) before and after rPSARP. ResultsA total of 172 patients were identified, of which 85 met inclusion criteria with a median follow-up of 23.9 months (IQR, 5.9–43.8 months). Thirty-six patients had spinal cord anomalies. Indications for rPSARP included mislocation (n = 42), posterior urethral diverticulum (PUD; n = 16), stricture (n = 19) and rectal prolapse (n = 8). Within 1 year following rPSARP, 11 patients (12.9%) had a negative change in bladder management, defined as need for beginning intermittent catheterization or undergoing urinary diversion, which increased to 16 patients (18.8%) at last follow-up. Postoperative bladder management changed in rPSARP patients with mislocation (p < 0.0001) and stricture (p 0.005) but not for rectal prolapse (p 0.143). ConclusionsPatients who undergo rPSARP warrant especially close attention for bladder dysfunction as we observed a negative postoperative change in bladder management in 18.8% of our series. Level of EvidenceLevel IV.

Sparing the Perineal Body: A Modification of the Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty for Anorectal Malformations with Rectovestibular Fistulae.

The posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) used to repair an anorectal malformation (ARM) with a rectovestibular fistula involves incising the perineal body skin and the sphincter muscles and a posterior sagittal incision to the coccyx. Perineal body dehiscence is the most common and morbid complication post-PSARP which can have a negative impact on future bowel control. With consideration of all the other approaches described to repair this anomaly, we developed a perineal body sparing modification of the standard PSARP technique. Four patients with ARM with a rectovestibular fistula were repaired with a perineal body sparing modified PSARP at a single institution between 2020 and 2021. The incision used was limited, involving only the length of the anal sphincter, with no incision anterior or posterior to the planned anoplasty. Dissection of the distal rectum and fistula was performed without cutting the perineal body. Once the distal rectum was mobilized off the posterior vaginal wall and out of the vestibule, the perineal body muscles, where the fistula had been, were reinforced and an anoplasty was then performed. Operative time was the same as for a standard PSARP. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. No postoperative dilations were performed. All patients healed well with an excellent cosmetic result. All are too young to assess for bowel control. We present a new technique, a modification of the traditional PSARP for rectovestibular fistula, which spares the perineal body. This approach could eliminate the potential complication of perineal body dehiscence.

A prospective cohort study of assisted bladder emptying following primary cloacal repair: The Children's National experience

Although the combination of bladder dysfunction and upper tract anomalies puts patient with cloaca at risk for renal disease, the rarity of this condition makes it difficult to study empirically. As a high-volume center, we uniquely capture bladder function outcomes following our growing number of cloacal repairs. 1) Describe the rates of incomplete bladder emptying following primary cloacal repair (at 2-3 months after repair and last follow up), and 2) identify clinical factors associated with assisted bladder emptying. We performed a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing primary cloaca repair by our Children's National Colorectal Center team between 2020 and 2021. The primary outcome was assisted bladder emptying at 2-3 months postoperatively and last visit. Covariables included preoperative characteristics (cloacagram measurements), ARM complexity (moderate=common channel [CC] <3-cm, severe=CC≥3-cm), vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) status, sacral ratio (good ≥0.7, intermediate 0.7-0.4, poor ≤0.4), spinal cord status, means of preoperative bladder emptying, and operative details (age at repair, repair type, & concomitant laparotomy). Eighteen participants were eligible. A majority had moderate cloaca (78%), VUR (67%), spinal cord abnormalities (89%), and good sacral ratios (56%). Preoperatively, 10 patients were diapered for urine and 8 had assisted bladder emptying. Surgical repairs were performed at a median age of 8 months (range 4-46). Nine (50%) patients underwent urogenital separation (UGS), eight (44%) total urogenital mobilization, and 1 (6%) perineal sparing posterior sagittal anorectoplasty with introitoplasty. Exploratory laparotomy was performed in 7 (39%) patients. At 2-3 months, 7 patients were voiding and 11 required assisted bladder emptying. Median length of long-term follow up was 12 months (range 5-25), and 8 patients were voiding and 10 required assisted bladder emptying. Postoperative need for assisted bladder emptying was significantly associated with assisted bladder emptying preoperatively, a shorter urethra and increasing common channel length, UGS and exploratory laparotomy. Spinal cord imaging findings were not associated. Bladder emptying following cloaca repair is likely a result of congenital function and surgical effects. Indeed, increasingly cloaca complexity requiring UGS and laparotomy was associated with both pre- and post-operative assisted bladder emptying. The lack of association with spinal cord imaging may reflect a divergence between anatomy and function. Approximately half of patients required assisted bladder emptying in this study. Associated factors included urethral and common channel length, the need for assisted bladder emptying preoperatively, the type of surgical approach and additional laparotomy. Being diapered with seemingly normal voiding prior to surgery did not guarantee normal bladder function postoperatively.

Sparing the Perineal Body: A Modification of the Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty for Anorectal Malformations with Rectovestibular Fistulae.

The posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) used to repair an anorectal malformation (ARM) with a rectovestibular fistula involves incising the perineal body skin and the sphincter muscles and a posterior sagittal incision to the coccyx. Perineal body dehiscence is the most common and morbid complication post-PSARP which can have a negative impact on future bowel control. With consideration of all the other approaches described to repair this anomaly, we developed a perineal body sparing modification of the standard PSARP technique. Four patients with ARM with a rectovestibular fistula were repaired with a perineal body sparing modified PSARP at a single institution between 2020 and 2021. The incision used was limited, involving only the length of the anal sphincter, with no incision anterior or posterior to the planned anoplasty. Dissection of the distal rectum and fistula was performed without cutting the perineal body. Once the distal rectum was mobilized off the posterior vaginal wall and out of the vestibule, the perineal body muscles, where the fistula had been, were reinforced and an anoplasty was then performed. Operative time was the same as for a standard PSARP. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. No postoperative dilations were performed. All patients healed well with an excellent cosmetic result. All are too young to assess for bowel control. We present a new technique, a modification of the traditional PSARP for rectovestibular fistula, which spares the perineal body. This approach could eliminate the potential complication of perineal body dehiscence.