Posterior Plate Fixation Research Articles

Outcomes Transverse Acetabular Fractures Treated with Posterior Column Plate Fixation and Anterior Column Screw Fixation

Outcomes Transverse Acetabular Fractures Treated with Posterior Column Plate Fixation and Anterior Column Screw Fixation

Surgical accidents and postoperative complications of recurrent shoulder dislocation treated by suture button fixation with bone occlusion

To summarize the surgical accidents and postoperative complications of the treatment of recurrent shoulder dislocation by suture button fixation and bone occlusion, and to provide clinical reference. The clinical data of 16 patients with recurrent shoulder dislocation treated with modified arthroscopic Latarjet suture button fixation and bone occlusion between July 2017 and April 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 15 were male and 1 was female. The age ranged from 16 to 45 years, with an average of 26 years. Admission examination showed the range of motion of shoulder joint was normal; the shoulder joint fear test was positive; En-face CT scan measured 10%-20% of the glenoid defects, averaging 13.4%; and MRI examination revealed bone Bankart injury. The disease duration ranged from 2 to 20 years, with an average of 7.1 years. The shoulder joint was dislocated 8- 45 times, with an average of 17.4 times, and the shoulder joint was unstable. The occurrence of surgical accidents and postoperative complications as well as corresponding measures and outcomes were recorded. All the incisions healed by first intention without any complications such as incision infection or vascular injury. All 16 cases were followed up for an average of 3.6 years (range, 1-7 years), and no shoulder redislocation occurred. Four types of intraoperative surgical accidents and two types of postoperative complications occurred in the early stage of implementation of the technique. Intraoperative surgical accidents included 1 case of difficulty in passing subscapular muscle through coracotomy with large size, which was treated with exchange rod or finger through subscapular muscle split; 2 cases of coracoidal process fracture, of which 1 case was treated conservatively, and the other case was sutured to the base of tendon and fixed through tunnel; 1 case of glenoid fracture occurred in the glenoid tunnel, which was fixed with knot-free anchors; the posterior loop plate fixation was abnormal in 2 cases, of which 1 case was re-fixed and the other case was renovated. Postoperative complications included coracoid bone mass displacement in 1 case, conservative biceps rehabilitation was given to avoid premature external rotation; 1 case of radial nerve injury of healthy upper limb and musculocutaneous nerve injury of affected side was given oral medication and physiotherapy. The above conditions recovered well after corresponding treatment. Suture button fixation with bone occlusion is a safe method for the treatment of recurrent shoulder dislocation. Careful operation should be performed during coracoid interception and glenoid tunnel drilling, especially in the fixation process.

Insights into optimal surgical fixation for posterior malleolar fractures.

The optimal management of posterior malleolar ankle fractures, a prevalent type of ankle trauma, is essential for improved prognosis. However, there remains a debate over the most effective surgical approach, particularly between screw and plate fixation methods. This study aims to investigate the differences in outcomes associated with these fixation techniques. We conducted a comprehensive review of clinical trials comparing anteroposterior (A-P) screws, posteroanterior (P-A) screws, and plate fixation. Two investigators validated the data sourced from multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science). Following PRISMA guidelines, we carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) using visual analogue scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included range of motion limitations, radiological outcomes, and complication rates. The NMA encompassed 13 studies, consisting of four randomized trials and eight retrospective ones. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve-based ranking, the A-P screw was ranked highest for improvements in AOFAS and exhibited lowest in infection and peroneal nerve injury incidence. The P-A screws, on the other hand, excelled in terms of VAS score improvements. Conversely, posterior buttress plate fixation showed the least incidence of osteoarthritis grade progression, postoperative articular step-off ≥ 2 mm, nonunions, and loss of ankle dorsiflexion ≥ 5°, though it underperformed in most other clinical outcomes. The NMA suggests that open plating is more likely to provide better radiological outcomes, while screw fixation may have a greater potential for superior functional and pain results. Nevertheless, clinicians should still consider the fragment size and fracture pattern, weighing the advantages of rigid biomechanical fixation against the possibility of soft-tissue damage, to optimize treatment results.

Different internal fixation methods for Hoffa-like fractures of the tibial plateau: a finite element analysis.

Due to the low incidence of posteromedial tibial plateau fractures and limited clinical data available, the optimal treatment for this type of fracture remains to be established. This type of fracture, also known as Hoffa-like fracture of the tibial plateau, shares a similar mechanism of injury with the Hoffa fracture of the femoral condyle. In the field of orthopedics, finite element analysis is considered a valuable method to guide clinical decision-making. In this study, four methods used for internal fixation of Hoffa-like fractures of the tibial plateau were compared using computer simulation and applying a finite element method (FEM). The methods compared were lateral L-plate fixation alone (Model A); lateral L-plate combined with posterior anti-slip plate (reconstruction plate/T-plate) fixation (Model B); lateral L-plate combined with posterior hollow nail fixation of the fracture block (Model C); and lateral L-plate combined with anterior hollow nail fixation of the fracture (Model D). The maximum displacement of the model and the maximum stress of the internal fixation material were analyzed by applying an axial load of 2,500 N. The results showed that, in the normal bone model, the maximum displacement of the fracture in Model A was 0.60032 mm, with improved stability through the addition of posterior lateral plate fixation in Model B and reduction of the displacement to 0.38882 mm. The maximum displacement in Model C and Model D was comparable, amounting to 0.42345 mm and 0.42273 mm, respectively. Maximum stress was 1235.6 MPa for Model A, 84.724 MPa for Model B, 99.805 MPa for Model C, and 103.19 MPa for Model D. In the internal fixation analysis of the osteoporotic fracture model, we observed patterns similar to the results of the normal bone model. The results indicated that Model B yielded the overall best results in the treatment of Hoffa-like fractures of the tibial plateau. The orthopedic surgeon may wish to implement these insights into the perioperative algorithm, thereby refining and optimizing clinical patient care. In addition, our findings pave the way for future research efforts.

Is the Posterior Approach With Posterior locking compression plate and Anterior Allograft Useful and Safe in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Humeral Fractures Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty?

IntroductionAs the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) surgery has dramatically increased in the last few decades, many complications have followed through. The periprosthetic fracture, at the moment, is still a subject of debate in the orthopedic world. In this monocentric study, along with a literature review of periprosthetic humeral fractures, we would present our institutional experience with the treatment of periprosthetic humeral fractures with a posterior humeral approach, posterior cortex plate fixation, anterior strut allograft, screws, and cerclage wires.Materials and MethodsOur study consisted in a prospective monocentric study based on 18 patients, with a mean age of 75.3 years (range 64–88), all following a reverse shoulder total arthroplasty (RTSA). Postoperative follow-ups were taken at 1, 6, and 12 months with objective measurement of shoulder motion and strength, while clinical outcome measures were assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES score) and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Together with that, we performed a literature review focused on the management of periprosthetic humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty.ResultsAll fractures consolidated without complication at a mean 4.2 months (range 3–6). At final follow-up, the average active shoulder flexion was 88° (range 62–129°), active abduction 73° (range 52–91°) and active external rotation 22° (range 3–56°). The average ASES score was 73 (range 59–97), while average VAS score was 1.1 (range 0–3).DiscussionSurgical treatment of periprosthetic humeral fractures following a shoulder arthroplasty remains a hard challenge for every surgeon, and their treatment must consider fracture’s location, displacement, and local bone quality.ConclusionsThe posterior approach with a posterior plate placement and anterior strut allograft, which is appliable only in case of a B or C type fracture according to Worland classification, could be a good treatment option for periprosthetic humeral fractures.

Ankle Fractures Involving the Posterior Malleolus: 7-Year Results in 100 Cases

Category:Ankle; TraumaIntroduction/Purpose:The presence of a posterior malleolar (PM) fragment has a negative prognostic impact in ankle fractures. The best treatment is still subject to debate and new concepts continue to emerge. The aim of this study was to assess the medium- to long-term clinical and functional outcome of ankle fractures with a PM fragment in a larger patient population treated with an individualized treatment approach.Methods:One hundred patients with ankle fractures involving the PM were identified retrospectively and reevaluated at an average follow-up of 7.0 years. Fixation of the PM was tailored to the individual fracture pattern. Bartoníček-Rammelt type I PM fractures (extraincisural shell-like fragments) were not fixed surgically. Displaced Type II (posterolateral fragments) and type III PM fractures (two-part with medial extension) were mostly fixed with direct posterior screw or plate fixation. Intercalary joint fragments were fixed with lost K-wires or resorbable pins. Type IV PM fractures (large triangular fragments) were treated with either posterior screw / plate fixation or indirect anteroposterior screw fixation with direct transfibular control of reduction, if feasible.Results:Internal PM fragment fixation was negatively correlated with the need for syndesmotic screw placement at the time of surgery (p=0.010). At 7 years, the mean Foot Function Index was 16.5, the Olerud Molander Ankle Score averaged 80.2 and the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle/hindfoot score averaged 87.5. The physical (PCS) and mental health component summary (MCS) scores of the SF-36 averaged 47.7 and 50.5, respectively. Range of motion was within 3.4 degrees of the uninjured side. The size of the PM fragment had no prognostic value. There was a trend to lower outcome scores with anterior or posterior shift of the distal fibula of 1 mm within the tibial incisura. Patients who underwent primary internal fixation had significantly superior SF-36 MCS than patients who underwent staged internal fixation (p=0.031). Two patients (2%) needed secondary ankle fusion following deep infection.Conclusion:With an individualized treatment protocol, tailored to the CT-based assessment of PM fractures, favorable medium and long-term results can be expected. The mere size of the PM fragment is just one of the factors guiding treatment, other important criteria are fragment displacement, impaction of the tibial plafond and incisura involvement. PM fixation provides direct bone-to-bone fixation of the syndesmosis and significantly reduces the need for additional transsyndesmotic fixation with a screw or flexible implant.

K-line in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: relationship with change in sagittal cervical curvature and laminoplasty outcomes.

To analyze how K-line is related to change in sagittal cervical curvature and laminoplasty outcomes in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). The study retrospectively analyzed 81 patients with OPLL who had undergone posterior cervical single-door laminoplasty and arch plate fixation between June 2011 and June 2017. Fifty-five were K-line positive (K[+]) and 26 were K-line negative (K[-]). Clinical and radiological results were compared between the groups. Patients were followed up for at least 2years. Before the operation, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, neck disability index (NDI), and short-form-36 (SF-36) quality of life score did not differ significantly between the groups. Neurological function was improved in both groups after the procedure. At last follow-up, JOA score, VAS score, NDI, SF-36 score, and JOA score improvement rate differed significantly between the groups. Before the operation, at the 3-month and final follow-ups, C2-7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, and C2-7 SVA differed significantly between the groups. The changes were more marked in the K(-) group than in the K(+) group. The incidence of cervical kyphosis differed significantly between the groups (P < 0.05), as well as between patients with lordosis < 7° and those with lordosis ≥ 7°. K-line negativity and lordosis < 7° may predict kyphosis after laminoplasty in patients with OPLL. The cervical curvature in patients with OPLL tends towards kyphosis and anteversion after laminoplasty, which contributes to the reduced clinical effect of the procedure.

Single column plate plus other column lag screw fixation vs. both column plate fixation for anterior column with posterior hemitransverse acetabular fractures - a biomechanical analysis using different loading protocols.

Open reduction and internal fixation of both columns is considered the treatment of choice for displaced anterior column with posterior hemitransverse (ACPHT) fractures in non-geriatric patients. Plate fixation of one column combined with lag screw fixation of the other column allows to decrease operative time and approach-related morbidity compared to conventional both column plating. The aim of this biomechanical study was to evaluate whether single column plate plus other column lag screw fixation confers similar stability to both column plate fixation. Physiological loads were simulated using both the single-leg stance (SLS) as well as the sit-to-stand (STS) loading protocols. A clinically relevant ACPHT fracture model was created using fourth-generation composite hemipelves. Fractures were stabilized with three different fixation constructs: (1) anterior column plate plus posterior column screw fixation (AP+PCS), posterior column plate plus anterior column screw fixation (PP+ACS) and anterior column plate plus posterior column plate fixation (AP+PP). Specimens were loaded from 50 to 750N with a ramp of 100N/s. Fracture gap motion (FGM) and relative interfragmentary rotation (RIFR) between the three main fracture fragments were assessed under loads of 750N using an optical 3D measurement system. STS loading generally resulted in higher mean FGM and RIFR than STS loading in the AP+PCS and AP+PP groups, while no significant differences were found in the PP+ACS group. Compared to conventional both column plate fixation (AP+PP), PP+ACS displayed significantly higher FGM and RIFR between the iliac wing and the posterior column during SLS loading. No significant differences in FGM and RIFR were identified between the AP+PCS and the AP+PP group. Overall, single column plate plus other column lag screw fixation conferred similar stability to conventional both column plate fixation. From a clinical point of view, AP+PCS appears to be the most attractive alternative to conventional AP+PP for internal fixation of ACPHT fractures.

Study of clinical outcome in posterior plating for fibula in bimalleolarfracture ankle

Introduction: The anatomy of the joint makes it very unstable in cases of fractures or ligamentous injuries of the ankle, because the whole body weight is transmitted through the ankle and locomotion depends upon the stability of the ankle joint. In the post-operative period, the protocol of mobilization of the ankle has been a topic of conflict. The goals of treatment include achieving sound union of fracture and an ankle that moves and functions normally without pain. Materials and Methods: This is prospective consecutive case series of 60 patients of bimalleolar ankle fracture, undergone internal fixation in the form of plate fixation over posterior surface of fibula for lateral malleolus and cancellous screw fixation for medial malleolus. Data collection was done using history sheet, clinical examination, and radiological examination at intervals while functional outcome was assessed at follow up visits using Weber’s assessment protocol. Results: 50 (83.3%) cases radiological union is achieved by 6 weeks while 10(16.7%) cases union time was 10 weeks. Average time for union was 6.7 weeks. The final outcome as per the Weber’s assessment protocol was 50% as excellent, 40% as good and 10% as poor result which showed good correlation with level of reduction achieved graded from immediate post-operative radiographs. Conclusion: Accuracy of reduction and rigid fixation was found to be a major determinant of functional outcome irrespective of the type of fracture. Posterior plate fixation gives bicortical screw purchase leading to secure fixation, no intra- articular penetration, decreased complications, hardware prominence and wound dehiscence. Keywords: Bimalleolar ankle fracture, Weber’s assessment, Lateral malleolus, Kristensen grade, Lauge-hansen classification.

Comparison of the efficacy of posterior-anterior screws, anterior-posterior screws and a posterior-anterior plate in the fixation of posterior malleolar fractures with a fragment size of\u2009\u2265\u200915 and\u2009

BackgroundDifferent fixation methods have been used to treat posterior malleolar fractures (PMFs), but the clinical efficacy of different fixation methods in the treatment of PMF with different fragmentation has rarely been reported. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of posterior-anterior (PA), anterior-posterior (AP) screws and PA plate in the fixation of PMFs with a fragment size of ≥15 and < 15%.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of the clinical data of 243 patients with a unilateral ankle fracture involving the posterior malleolar ankle fracture. All patients were divided into two groups based on their fragment size, ≥15% (n = 136) and < 15% (n = 107). After reduction of PMF under direct vision via a posterolateral approach, posterior-anterior (PA), anterior-posterior (AP) screws and PA plate were used for fixation of PMF in the two groups. Briefly, for fixation of PMF with PA screw, two to three 3.5-mm (Depuy Synthes, Switzerland) cannulated screws were placed from the posterior to anterior direction; for fixation with PA plate, a 3.5-mm reconstruction plate (Depuy Synthes, Switzerland) was placed from the posterior to anterior direction, and for fixation of PMF with an AP screw, two to three 3.5-mm screws were placed from the anterior to posterior direction. All patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and thereafter at 6-month intervals. The primary outcomes were AOFAS and ROM, which were recorded at the final follow-up.ResultsThe average follow-up time for all patients was 18.9 months (range 12–36 months), and all fractures healed. In fragment size ≥15% group, the average AOFAS score of patients treated with PA, AP screws and posterior plate were 91.5, 91.8, and 90.8, respectively, and the average limited ankle-dorsiflexion ROM was 5.0 °, 5.4 ° and 5.6°, respectively, at the last follow-up, there was no significant difference between the three fixation methods in terms of AOFAS scores and ankle ROM (P > 0.05). In fragment size < 15% group, the average AOFAS score of patients treated with PA, AP screws and posterior plate were 92.3, 91.9, and 84.1, respectively, the average limited ankle-dorsiflexion ROM were 5.1 °, 4.7 °, and 6.3 °, respectively, at the last follow-up. There were statistically significant differences in AOFAS scores and ankle ROM between posterior plate fixation and PA, AP screw fixation (P < 0.05); while no significant difference was found between PA and AP screw fixation (P > 0.05).ConclusionFor PMFs with fragment size ≥15%, there was no significant difference in the outcomes between the three fixation methods. For PMF with fragmentation < 15%, the PA and AP screws both provided good fixation.

Posteroanterior Lag Screws Versus Posterior Buttress Plate Fixation of Posterior Malleolar Fragments in Spiral Tibial Shaft Fracture

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of posteroanterior (PA) lag screws versus posterior buttress plate fixation in treatment of posterior malleolar fragments (PMFs) in spiral tibial shaft fracture, and provide guidance for surgeons selecting a treatment strategy. A total of 48 eligible patients with PMFs associated with spiral tibial shaft fracture surgically treated from March 2009 to January 2016 were included in the study. They were divided into the screw group (n = 24) and the plate group (n = 24). All operations were performed via a posterolateral approach by a senior orthopedic surgeon. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, visual analog scale (VAS), and assessment of ankle range of motion (ROM) were used for clinical evaluation. The radiographic evaluation of posttraumatic arthritis scale was determined by Bargon reference criteria. At the mean follow-up period of 29.5 ± 4.3 and 30.4 ± 4.1 months, respectively (p > .05), all patients in both groups had bone union without severe wound problems or complications. There were no significant differences in AOFAS (92.5 ± 5.3 vs 94.7 ± 5.6, p = .129) and VAS (2.4 ± 0.8 vs 2.2 ± 0.9, p = .196) scores between the groups at final follow-up. No significant differences were found between the groups in injured/contralateral ankle ROM or posttraumatic ankle arthritis scale postoperatively (p > .05). For PMFs in spiral tibial shaft fracture, PA lag screws or posterior buttress plate fixation via a posterolateral approach can achieve good and equivalent clinical and radiological outcomes with minimal complications.

Open reduction and internal fixation of humeral midshaft fractures: anterior versus posterior plate fixation

BackgroundFractures of the humeral shaft represent 2–4% of all fractures. Fractures of the humerus have traditionally been approached posteriorly for open reduction and internal fixation. Reports of treating midshaft fractures with an open anterolateral approach and anterior plating are limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a series of humeral shaft fractures treated with plate osteosynthesis regarding the effect of the approach and plate location on the healing rate and occurrence of complications.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of patients aged over 18 years with humeral midshaft fractures treated with anterior or posterior plate fixation. Selection of the approach to the humerus was based on the particular pattern of injury and soft tissue involvement. The minimum follow-up duration was set at six months. The outcomes included the rate of union, primary nerve palsy recovery, secondary nerve damage, infection and revision surgery.ResultsBetween 2006 and 2014, 58 patients (mean age, 59.9; range, 19–97 years) with humeral midshaft fractures were treated with anterior (n = 33) or posterior (n = 25) plate fixation. After a mean follow-up duration of 34 months, 57 of 58 fractures achieved union after index procedure. Twelve fractures were associated with primary radial nerve palsy. Ten of the twelve patients with primary radial palsy recovered completely within six months after the index surgery. In total, one patient developed secondary palsy after anterior plating, and three patients developed secondary palsy after posterior plating. No significant difference in the healing rate (p = 0.4), primary nerve palsy recovery rate (p = 0.6) or prevalence of secondary nerve palsy (p = 0.4) was found between the two clinical groups. No cases of infection after plate fixation were documented.ConclusionsOpen reduction and internal fixation using an anterior approach with plate fixation provides a safe alternative to posterior plating in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. An anterior approach allows supine positioning of the patient and yields union and complication rates comparable to those of a posterior approach with plate fixation for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures.

Discussion on the selection of internal fixation methods for unstable sacral fractures

Currently, the internal fixation methods for unstable sacral fractures mainly include posterior tension band screw plate fixation, sacroiliac screw fixation, lumbopelvic fixation and triangular osteosynthesis. The purpose of the above internal fixation is to correct the deformity of the pelvic ring and lumbosacral joint and rebuild its stability, but incorrect selection will increase the risk of loosening or breakage of the internal fixation. However, there are no clear guidelines on how to select appropriate internal fixation according to different fracture types. To this end, the author discussed the selection of internal fixation method, the technique of screw placement, the new auxiliary instrumentation technology as well as internal fixation related infection so as to provide reference for the treatment of unstable sacral fractures. Key words: Sacrum; Fracture fixation, internal; Sacroiliac screw

A biomechanical evaluation of different fixation strategies for posterolateral fragments in tibial plateau fractures and introduction of the ‘magic screw’

BackgroundPosterior plate fixation is biomechanically the strongest fixation method for posterolateral column fracture (PLCF) of the tibial plateau; however, there are inherent deficiencies and risks of a posterior approach. Thus, the ‘magic screw’ was proposed to enhance fixation stability of the lateral rafting plate used for PLCF. The purpose of this study was to re-examine and compare the stability of different fixation methods for PLCF. MethodsSynthetic tibiae models were used to simulate posterolateral split fractures. The fracture models were randomly assigned into three groups: Group A, fixed with posterolateral buttress plates; Group B, with lateral locking compression plates (LCP); and Group C fixed with lateral LCPs and one ‘magic screw’. Gradually increased axial compressive loads were applied to each specimen. ResultsThere was a mean subsidence hierarchy of the posterolateral fragment at different load levels: Group A had the least subsidence, followed by Group C, and Group B had the most. There were no significant differences in the mean loads at different displacements between Group A and Group C. Group A had the highest axial stiffness. Additionally, there was a significant difference in axial stiffness between Group B and Group C. ConclusionBiomechanical stability of the combined fixation of the posteriorly positioned lateral rafting plate with the ‘magic screw’ was much closer to that of posterior plate fixation for split-type PLCF. The necessity of posterior fixation through a posterior approach may be reduced for selected patients.

Reinforcement strategy for lateral rafting plate fixation in posterolateral column fractures of the tibial plateau: The magic screw technique

BackgroundA posterolateral column fracture of the tibial plateau (PLCF) is not uncommon, especially lateral and bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Currently, there is no consensus on the methods of surgical treatment for PLCF, including the surgical approach or the fixation strategy. Though various posterior approaches have been explored and can allow posterior buttress plate fixation, the necessity of a posterior approach with fixation for PLCFs is increasingly questioned. Meanwhile, there is no literature to analyse the morphological features of PLCFs. None of the available surgical techniques can solve all of the problems of PLCFs. MethodsFrom February 2016 to June 2016, an inconsecutive series of 16 patients who suffered Schatzker type II tibial plateau fractures involving the posterolateral column were selected based on an analysis of the morphological characteristics of PLCFs. The patients were all treated by lateral rafting plate fixation with magic screw implantation through the extended lateral approach. ResultsAccording to PLCF morphology, 4 patients had mild slope-type depression fractures (MSDF) of the articular surface, and the other 12 patients had block-type splitting fractures (BSF). After a 12-month follow-up period, there were no complications related to the fixation technique and no significant changes in limb alignment. At the final follow-up, the average range of motion (ROM) of the affected knees was 2.3°−125°, and the average HSS score was 94.2. ConclusionsThe selected patients who suffered Schatzker type II fractures involving the posterolateral column could be successfully treated via lateral rafting plate fixation with the magic screw technique. For PLCF treatment, magic screw fixation is a valuable technique that may reduce the utilization of posterior approaches and posterior fixations.

Comparing Different Surgical Techniques for Addressing the Posterior Malleolus in Supination External Rotation Ankle Fractures and the Need for Syndesmotic Screw Fixation

Trimalleolar ankle fractures are unstable injuries with possible syndesmotic disruption. Recent data have described inherent morbidity associated with screw fixation of the syndesmosis, including the potential for malreduction, hardware irritation, and post-traumatic arthritis. The posterior malleolus is an important soft tissue attachment for the posterior inferior syndesmosis ligament. We hypothesized that fixation of a sizable posterior malleolar (PM) fracture in supination external rotation type IV (SER IV) ankle fractures would act to stabilize the syndesmosis and minimize or eliminate the need for trans-syndesmotic fixation. A retrospective review of trimalleolar ankle fractures surgically treated from October 2006 to April of 2011 was performed. A total of 143 trimalleolar ankle fractures were identified, and 97 were classified as SER IV. Of the 97 patients, 74 (76.3%) had a sizable PM fragment. Syndesmotic fixation was required in 7 of 34 (20%) and 27 of 40 (68%), respectively, when the PM was fixed versus not fixed (p = .0002). When the PM was indirectly reduced using an anterior to posterior screw, 7 of 15 patients (46.7%) required syndesmotic fixation compared with none of 19 patients when the PM fragment was fixated with direct posterior lateral plate fixation (p = .0012). Fixation of the PM fracture in SER IV ankle fractures can restore syndesmotic stability and, thus, lower the rate of syndesmotic fixation. We found that fixation of a sizable PM fragment in SER IV or equivalent injuries through posterolateral plating can eliminate the need for syndesmotic screw fixation.

Plate Osteosynthesis of Proximal Ulna Fractures—A Biomechanical Micromotion Analysis

Double plating has been promoted, in recent years, as an alternative treatment method for proximal ulna fractures. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical properties of double-plate osteosynthesis with posterior plate fixation using a novel investigational design utilizing a 3-dimensional camera system to analyze fracture micromotion. Fourteen fresh-frozen specimens were available for this study. Mayo type IIA fractures of the olecranon were created and internal fixation was performed with either an angular stable posterior plate or angular stable double plates. Fracture micromotion was evaluated by means of digital image correlation with a 3-dimensional camera system before and after dynamic cyclic loading from 15° to 90° of elbow flexion with a pulling force of 25 N to 80 N. Micromotion of fragments was less pronounced in double-plate osteosynthesis when compared with single plates before and after cyclic loading. However, overall results were similar. Two of the single plates failed during cyclic loading but there were no failures in the double plates. This biomechanical analysis shows that single and double plating results in comparable stability of fixation. Although the double-plating technique tends to provide more stable fixation, relevant differences were not observed. Double plating potentially represents an efficient option for fixation of proximal ulna fractures. It could decrease the risk of soft tissue complications owing to their low profile and the superior soft tissue coverage.

Plate fixation for Letenneur type I Hoffa fracture: a biomechanical study

BackgroundA coronal fracture of the posterior femoral condyle, also known as a Hoffa fracture, is an unusual injury, and there are only a handful of case reports or series exploring it. The optimal fixation method of these intraarticular fractures remains controversial; improper or unstable fixation usually lead to an unsatisfactory prognosis. The use of posterior–anterior or reversed lag screw fixation is still a popular method. Additional buttress plating is also recommended for fixation of these difficult fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical strength of four different fixation patterns for this uncommon fracture. Material and methodsSixteen sawbone simulated models of Letenneur type I Hoffa fractures were created with one of four fixation patterns: two screws implanted in the anterior–posterior (AP) direction or posterior–anterior (PA) direction; one screw in the PA direction with a plate implanted in the posterior position of the distal femoral condyle or with a plate in the lateral position. Biomechanical testing was performed to determine the post-fixation axial stiffness, the maximum load to failure and the fragment vertical displacement for each of the four constructs. ResultsThe plate fixation patterns whether implanted in the posterior or lateral position were shown to provide higher overall axial stiffness and load to failure, and less vertical displacement than the other two patterns of pure screw fixation. Among these constructs, the lateral plate fixation was found to provide the highest stiffness and load to failure and the least displacement for the posterior condylar fragments, followed by the posterior plate fixation. The lowest overall stiffness and load to failure and the largest vertical displacement were found in the construct with the AP direction placed screws. ConclusionIt was concluded that the lateral position implanted plate is biomechanically the strongest fixation method for Letenneur type I Hoffa fractures. However, this plate fixation is not recommended for all cases. The choice of internal fixation pattern depends on the surgeons.

Biomechanical Analysis of Stability of Posterior Antiglide Plating in Osteoporotic Pronation Abduction Ankle Fracture Model With Posterior Tibial Fragment.

We performed a biomechanical comparison of 2 methods for operative stabilization of pronation-abduction stage III ankle fractures; group 1: Anterior-posterior lag screws fixing the posterior tibial fragment and lateral fibula plating (LSLFP) versus group 2: locked plate fixation of the posterior tibial fragment and posterior antiglide plate fixation of the fibula (LPFP). Seven pairs of fresh-frozen osteoligamentous lower leg specimens (2 male, and 5 female donors) were used for the biomechanical testing. Bone mineral density (BMD) of each specimen was assessed by means of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. After open transection of the deltoid ligament, an osteotomy model of pronation abduction stage III ankle fracture was created. Specimens were systematically assigned to LSLFP (group 1, left ankles) or LPPFP (group 2, right ankles). After surgery, all specimens were evaluated via CT to verify reduction and fixation. Axial load was then applied onto each specimen using a servohydraulic testing machine starting from 0 N (Zwick/Roell, Ulm, Germany) at a speed of 10 N/s with the foot fixed in a 10 degrees pronation and 15 degrees dorsiflexion position. Construct stiffness, yield, and ultimate strength were measured and dislocation patterns were documented with a high-speed camera. The normal distribution of all data was analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk test. The group comparison was performed using paired Student t test. Statistical significance was assumed at a P value of .05. All specimens had BMD values consistent with osteoporosis. BMD values did not differ between the left and right ankles of the same pair ( P = .762). The mean BMD values between feet of men (0.603 g/cm2) and women (0.329 g/cm2) were statistically different ( P = .005). The ultimate strength for LSLFP (group 1) with 1139 ± 669 N and LPPFP (group 2) with 2008 ± 943 N was statistically different ( P = .036) as well as the yield in LSLFP (group 1) 812 ± 452 N and LPPFD (group 2) 1292 ± 625 N ( P = .016). Construct stiffness trended to be higher in group 2 (179 ± 100 kNn) compared to group 1 (127 ± 73 kN/m) but this difference was not statistically significant ( P = .120). BMD correlated with bone-construct failure. Fixation of the posterior tibial edge with a posterolateral locking plate resulted in higher biomechanical stability than anterior-posterior lag screw fixation in an osteoporotic pronation-abduction fracture model. The clinical implication of this biomechanical study is that the posterior antiglide plating might be advantageous in patients with osteoporotic pronation abduction stage III ankle fracture.

Technique, Complications, and Mid-Term Results of Hindfoot Arthrodesis with a Posterior Blade Plate

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Previous hindfoot surgeries present a unique challenge in performing hindfoot arthrodesis. The use of a blade plate construct is widely accepted, however there is limited data supporting the use of a posterior approach to blade plate arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to (1) describe demographics of patients who underwent posterior hindfoot arthrodesis using a blade plate, (2) describe our surgical technique, (3) discuss outcomes, and (4) compare patients with and without complications. Methods: Between December 2001 and July 2014, 42 patients underwent hindfoot arthrodesis using a posterior blade plate and 40 patients were included in this study. Demographic data including age, gender, body mass index, smoking status, and comorbidities were analyzed. Surgical data including indication for the surgery, previous surgical treatment, and additional surgical procedures were reviewed. Weight-bearing radiographs were used to assess the fusion rate. Clinic and surgery notes were reviewed for possible intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative complications. Univariate analysis was performed to compare patients who experienced complications with those who did not. There were 27 male and 13 female patients with a mean age of 56.4 ± 13.4 years. Twenty-eight patients had a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis in a primary (n=6), primary staged (n=10), revision (n=9), or revision staged (n=3) setting. Eleven patients had ankle arthrodesis (primary n=7, revision n=4). The latest follow-up averaged 46.5 ± 27.5 months (range, 13.7-137.2 months). Results: Patients had a median of two previous hindfoot or ankle surgeries (range, 0-9 surgeries). Thirty-three of 40 (82%) procedures fused at an average of 24.4 ± 21.2 weeks. Four patients had a delayed osseous union. Seven patients had a nonunion, including ankle (n=3), subtalar (n=3), and both (n=1) joints. Patient groups with, and without primary solid osseous unions were comparable in terms of demographic data and surgical details. Eighteen major and eight minor complications were observed. Patients with or without complications were comparable in terms of demographic data and surgical characteristics. In total six patients (15%) underwent below knee amputation due to unsatisfactory results. Conclusion: Indications for hindfoot arthrodesis using posterior blade plate fixation include a diverse patient population. These surgeries may be performed as primary, revision, primary staged, or revision staged procedures. Most of the patients in our cohort had previous ankle/hindfoot surgeries. The fusion rate is lower than in primary hindfoot arthrodesis as reported in the current literature. The complications rate is high.