Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Research Articles

Signal intensity of repaired posterior roots after transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears in stable knees: Magnetic resonance imaging evaluations at 3 years postoperatively

BackgroundOnly a few studies have assessed signal intensity after pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) tears (MMPRTs) based on mid-term magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the quantitative signal intensity of repaired posterior roots over time, up to 3 years postoperatively, and the related factors. MethodsThis study included 36 patients who underwent pullout repair for MMPRTs and MRI examinations using the same MRI system. The signal intensity of the repaired posterior roots was quantitatively evaluated using the signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ). Medial meniscus extrusion (MME), the SNQ for MMPR, and clinical scores were assessed over 3 years postoperatively. ResultsMME progressed over time until 3 years postoperatively, and its progression during this period was 1.61 ± 1.44 mm. The SNQ for MMPR decreased over time until 3 years postoperatively, and the change in the SNQ from 3 months to 3 years postoperatively (ΔSNQ) was 2.69 ± 1.69. All clinical scores significantly improved (p < 0.001). ΔSNQ was significantly correlated with body weight (correlation coefficient = -0.424, p = 0.010) and body mass index (correlation coefficient = -0.330, p = 0.050). However, ΔSNQ was not significantly correlated with preoperative or postoperative clinical scores. ConclusionAfter pullout repair for MMPRTs, MME progressed to 3 years postoperatively. However, the signal intensity of the repaired posterior roots decreased, and clinical scores improved over time until 3 years postoperatively. Patient weight and body mass index were significantly correlated with the reduced signal intensity of the repaired posterior roots, suggesting that weight assessment in patients with MMPRTs is crucial.Level of evidence: IV.

High incidence of medial meniscus root/radial tears and extrusion in 253 patients with subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee.

The demographic and radiological risk factors of subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee (SIFK) continue to be a subject of debate. The purpose of this study was to associate patient-specific factors with SIFK in a large cohort of patients. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with SIFK as verified on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All radiographs and MRIs were reviewed to assess characteristics such as meniscus tear presence and type, subchondral oedema presence and location, location of SIFK, mechanical limb alignment, osteoarthritis as assessed by Kellgren-Lawrence grade and ligamentous injury. A total of 253 patients (253 knees) were included, with 171 being female. The average body mass index (BMI) was 32.1 ± 7.0 kg/m2. SIFK was more common in patients with medial meniscus tears (77.1%, 195/253) rather than tears of the lateral meniscus (14.6%, 37/253) (p < 0.001). Medial meniscus root and radial tears of the posterior horn were present in 71.1% (180/253) of patients. Ninety-one percent (164/180) of medial meniscus posterior root and radial tears had an extrusion ≥3.0 mm. Eighty-one percent (119/147) of patients with SIFK on the medial femoral condyle and 86.8% (105/121) of patients with SIFK on the medial tibial plateau had a medial meniscus tear. Varus knees had a significantly increased rate of SIFK on the medial femoral condyle in comparison to valgus knees (p = 0.016). In this large cohort of patients with SIFK, there was a high association with medial meniscus root and radial tears of the posterior horn, meniscus extrusion ≥3.0 mm as well as higher age, female gender and higher BMI. Additionally, there was a particularly strong association of medial compartment SIFK with medial meniscus tears. As SIFK is frequently undiagnosed, identifying patient-specific demographic and radiological risk factors will help achieve a prompt diagnosis. Level IV.

Accurate tibial tunnel position in transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears delays the progression of medial joint space narrowing.

This study aimed to evaluate the association between the progression of medial joint space (MJS) narrowing, medial meniscus extrusion (MME) and clinical scores and the tibial tunnel position in pullout repairs for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs). This retrospective study examined 54 patients. Changes in MJS (ΔMJS), MME (ΔMME) and clinical scores and their relationship with the tibial tunnel position were evaluated using correlation coefficients. The distance from the anatomical to technical attachment position in the tibial tunnel position was measured in the anterior and medial directions, and the direct distance was measured using the Pythagorean theorem. The mean ΔMJS and ΔMME were 0.6 ± 0.8 and 1.3 ± 1.3 mm, respectively, and the mean anterior, medial and direct distances were 1.4 ± 2.3, 2.2 ± 1.7 and 3.4 ± 1.7 mm, respectively. ΔMJS had a significant positive correlation with the medial (r = 0.580, p < 0.001) and direct (r = 0.559, p < 0.001) distances, while ΔMME had a significant positive correlation with direct distance (r = 0.295, p = 0.030). Several clinical scores were significantly negatively correlated with these distances. In transtibial pullout repair for MMPRTs, accurate tibial tunnel position delayed the progression of MJS narrowing and MME, leading to improved clinical outcomes. The progression of MJS narrowing was associated with the mediolateral direction of the tibial tunnel position, while the clinical scores were associated with the anteroposterior direction of the tibial tunnel position. These findings indicate the need to orient the tip of the guide in a more posterolateral direction when creating the tibial tunnel. Level IV.

More than 3 mm of preoperative medial meniscal extrusion is identified as a key risk factor for varus progression in limb alignment after arthroscopic repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear.

To investigate the risk factors for varus progression after arthroscopic medial meniscal posterior root tear (MMPRT) repair and to compare the clinical outcomes between two groups: one with more varus progression and the other with less varus progression. Patients who underwent isolated arthroscopic repair of MMPRT between 2015 and 2020 were enroled, and 2-year follow-up data were collected. Participants were categorized into two groups based on preoperative values of the weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio: group A with <5.9% increase and group B with ≥5.9% increase. Various factors, including demographic features and radiological findings, were analysed and compared between the two groups. Intra-meniscal signal intensity, meniscal healing, medial meniscal extrusion (MME), and articular cartilage grade were assessed preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively using coronal magnetic resonance imaging. The final cohort consisted of 34 patients in group A and 46 in group B, with a mean age of 55.8 ± 11.2 and 59.8 ± 6.6 years, respectively. Preoperative WBL ratio and cartilage lesions in the medial compartment did not differ between the groups. Preoperative MME were significantly lower in group A than those in group B (2.6 ± 0.6 mm in group A and 3.5 ± 0.7 mm in group B, p < 0.05). Patient-reported outcomes at the 2-year follow-up did not differ between the two groups (n. s.). In a logistic analysis, the odds ratio of MME was 2.1 (p < 0.05), and the cutoff value of MME was 3.02 mm. Preoperative MME is a risk factor for varus progression. However, no differences in patient-reported outcomes were observed at 2-year follow-up, even in the group with greater varus progression. Level IV.

Meniscal healing status after medial meniscus posterior root repair negatively correlates with a midterm increase in medial meniscus extrusion.

The second-look arthroscopic score of pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) is associated with contemporaneous clinical scores and progression of cartilage damage. However, the relationship among these scores, midterm clinical scores and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations is unknown. The relationship between the second-look arthroscopic score at 1 year and the clinical scores or MRI at 3 years was evaluated. Sixty-three patients were included. Medial meniscus extrusion (MME) was evaluated preoperatively and at 3 years postoperatively. Clinical scores were evaluated preoperatively, and 1 and 3 years postoperatively. Meniscal healing status was assessed using the semiquantitative second-look arthroscopic score at 1 year postoperatively. Correlation coefficients between patient characteristics, postoperative clinical scores or second-look arthroscopic score and the change in MME (ΔMME) were evaluated. Multiple regression analysis was performed on the ΔMME to evaluate the effects of patient characteristics and second-look arthroscopic scores. No significant correlation was observed between patient characteristics and ΔMME. In contrast, a significant correlation was found between the second-look arthroscopic score and ΔMME (p < 0.001) and visual analogue scale pain score (p = 0.016) at 3 years postoperatively. In the subitems of the second-look arthroscopic score, width (p < 0.001) and stability (p = 0.009) scores also showed significant correlations with ΔMME. Multiple regression analysis showed a significant association between the second-look arthroscopic score and ΔMME (p = 0.001). The second-look arthroscopic score at 1 year postoperatively correlated with the ΔMME and clinical score at 3 years postoperatively. Second-look arthroscopic scores predict midterm meniscal function after pullout repair of MMPRTs. Level IV.

Better clinical outcomes and return to sport rates with additional medial meniscus root tear repair in high tibial osteotomy for medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis.

This retrospective study aimed to investigate whether the repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) is effective for improving clinical outcomes and return to sports rates in young patients (50 years old or younger) with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and MMPRTs. Between 2016 and 2019, 153 patients with KOA and MMPRTs who underwent open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) were retrospectively included. The patients were divided into OWHTO combined with MMPRT repair (n = 73) and isolated OWHTO (n = 80) groups. Lysholm scores, Hospital for Special Surgery (HHS) scores, Tegner scores, flexion contracture, range of knee flexion, return to sports rates and postoperative complications were compared. Radiological outcomes, including hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA) and Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade, were compared between the two groups. After a mean follow-up of 30.1 ± 3.0 months, the OWHTO + Repair group observed better clinical outcomes compared with the OWHTO group (Lysholm score: 86.7 ± 7.4 vs. 81.6 ± 6.9, p = 0.023. HHS score: 85.4 ± 8.20 vs. 80.5 ± 7.1, p = 0.039). The OWHTO + Repair group had higher Tegner scores and return to sports rates than the OWHTO group (Tegner score: 6 vs. 5, p = 0.020; return to sports rates: 38% vs. 15%, p = 0.001). No fracture or major complications occurred. Radiological outcomes showed no significant differences between the two groups (HKA: 181.1 ± 2.7 vs. 180.1 ± 1.5 n.s; MPTA: 90.1 ± 1.8 vs. 89.2 ± 1.4, n.s; JLCA:1.9 ± 0.7 vs. 2.1 ± 0.7, n.s). Additional MMPRT repair during OWHTO was associated with better clinical outcomes and higher rates of return to sports in young patients with medial compartment KOA and MMPRTs. Level III.

The Effect of Lower Limb Alignment on Tibiofemoral Joint Contact Biomechanics after Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair: A Finite-Element Analysis.

The purpose of this study was to determine how variations in lower limb alignment affect tibiofemoral joint contact biomechanics in the setting of medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) and associated root repair. A finite-element model of an intact knee joint was developed. Limb alignments ranging from 4° valgus to 8° varus were simulated under a 1,000 N compression load applied to the femoral head. For the intact, MMPRT, and root repair conditions, the peak contact pressure (PCP), total contact area, mean and maximum local contact pressure (LCP) elevation, and total area of LCP elevation of the medial tibiofemoral compartment were quantified. The PCP and total contact area of the medial compartment in the intact knee increased from 2.43 MPa and 361 mm2 at 4° valgus to 9.09 MPa and 508 mm2 at 8° of varus. Compared with the intact state, in the MMPRT condition, medial compartment PCP was greater and the total contact area smaller for all alignment conditions. Root repair roughly restored PCPs in the medial compartment; however, this ability was compromised in knees with increasing varus alignment. Specifically, elevations in PCP relative to the intact state increased with increasing varus, as did the total contact area with LCP elevation. After root repair, medial compartment PCP remained elevated above the intact state at all degrees tested, ranging from 0.05 MPa at 4° valgus to 0.27 MPa at 8° of varus, with overall PCP values increasing from 2.48 to 9.09 MPa. For varus alignment greater than 4°, root repair failed to reduce the total contact area with LCP elevation relative to the MMPRT state. Greater PCPs and areas of LCP elevation in varus knees may reduce the clinical effectiveness of root repair in delaying or preventing the development of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis.

Differences Between Traumatic and Degenerative Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Systematic Review.

Intact meniscus roots are a prerequisite for normal meniscal function, including even distribution of compressive forces across the knee joint. An injury to the root disrupts the hoop strength of the meniscus and may lead to its extrusion and the development of osteoarthritis. A medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) is often thought to have a primary degenerative pathogenesis. However, there is mention of some cases of MMPRTs where the patients have a solely traumatic injury to a previously healthy meniscus. To describe a subpopulation of patients with traumatic MMPRT. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 5. The Web of Science database (www.webofscience.com) was queried using the Medical Subject Headings term "medial root tear." Articles were reviewed, and those evaluated for MMPRTs in a degenerative meniscus were excluded. A total of 25 articles describing cases of acute traumatic causes were included in this study. For these articles, the patient characteristics, injury mechanisms, and concomitant injuries evaluated were recorded and pooled. The search revealed 660 articles, and 25 were selected for inclusion. A total of 113 patients with a traumatic MMPRT were identified and included in this review. The study population had a mean age of 27.1 years and a high share of men (64%). Also, this review displays how most patients with traumatic MMPRTs also suffer concomitant injuries (68%). The findings in this review support our hypothesis that there is a unique subgroup with acute traumatic MMPRTs that have unique patient characteristics, injury mechanisms, and combined injuries, compared with previously published reviews on MMPRTs.

Biomechanical Performance of Transtibial Pull-Out Posterior Horn Medial Meniscus Root Repair Is Improved With Knotless Adjustable Suture Anchor-Based Fixation.

While posterior medial meniscus root (PMMR) techniques have evolved, there remains a need to both optimize repair strength and improve resistance to cyclic loading. Adjustable tensioning would lead to higher initial repair strength and reduce displacement with cyclic loading compared with previously described transtibial pull-out repair (TPOR) fixation techniques. Controlled laboratory study. A total of 56 porcine medial menisci were used. Eight intact specimens served as a control for the native meniscus. For the others, PMMR tears were created and repaired with 6 different TPOR techniques (8 in each group). Fixed PMMR repairs were executed using 4 different suture techniques (two No. 2 cinch sutures, two cinch tapes, two No. 2 simple sutures, and two No. 2 sutures in a Mason-Allen configuration) all tied over a cortical button. Adjustable PMMR repairs using Mason-Allen sutures were fixed with an adjustable soft tissue anchor fixation tensioned at either 80 N or 120 N. The initial force, stiffness, and relief displacement of the repairs were measured after fixation. Repair constructs were then cyclically loaded, with cyclic displacement and stiffness measured after 1000 cycles. Finally, the specimens were pulled to failure. The PMMR repaired with the 2 cinch sutures fixed technique afforded the lowest (P < .001) initial repair load, stiffness, and relief displacement. The adjustable PMMR repairs achieved a higher initial repair load (P < .001) and relief displacement (P < .001) than all fixed repairs. The 2 cinch sutures fixed technique showed an overall higher cyclic displacement (P < .028) and was completely loose compared with the native meniscus functional zone. Repairs with adjustable intratunnel fixation showed displacement with cyclic loading similar to the native meniscus. With cyclic loading, the Mason-Allen adjustable repair with 120 N of tension showed less displacement (P < .016) than all fixed repairs and a stiffness comparable to the fixed Mason-Allen repair. The fixed Mason-Allen technique demonstrated a higher ultimate load (P < .007) than the adjustable Mason-Allen techniques. All repairs were less stiff, with lower ultimate failure loads, than the native meniscus root attachment (P < .0001). Adjustable TPOR led to considerably higher initial repair load and relief displacement than other conventional fixed repairs and restricted cyclic displacement to match the native meniscus function. However, the ultimate failure load of the adjustable devices was lower than that of a Mason-Allen construct tied over a cortical button. All repair techniques had a significantly lower load to failure than the native meniscus root. Knotless adjustable PMMR repair based on soft anchor fixation results in higher tissue compression and less displacement, but the overall clinical significance on healing rates remains unclear.

High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging can predict osteoarthritic progression after medial meniscus posterior root injury: randomized in vivo experimental study in a rabbit model

ImportanceThe field of meniscal root preservation has undergone significant advancement over the past decades; however, the challenge remains to fully understand whether meniscal root repair can ultimately arrest or delay osteoarthritic changes. ObjectiveTo assess longitudinal changes in articular cartilage, subchondral bone, and progression to meniscal extrusion (ME) using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MethodsMedial meniscus posterior root tear was surgically induced in 39 New Zealand white rabbits. Animals were randomly assigned into three experimental groups: partial meniscectomy after root tear (PM, n ​= ​13); root tear left in situ (CT, n ​= ​13); and transtibial root repair (RR, n ​= ​13). Contralateral limbs were used as healthy controls. High resolution 4.7 Tesla MRI of the knee joint was performed at baseline, after 2-, and 4-months of post-surgery. Cartilage thickness was calculated in medial and lateral compartments. In addition, the evaluation of ME, subchondral bone edema and healing potential after root repair were assessed too. ResultsProgressive cartilage thinning, ME, and subchondral bone edema were evident in all 3 study groups after 4-months of follow-up. The mean cartilage thickness in the PM group was 0.53 ​mm (±0.050), 0.57 ​mm (±0.05) in the CT group, and 0.60 ​mm (±0.08) in the RR group. The PM group exhibited significantly higher cartilage loss when compared to the CT and RR groups (p ​< ​0.001). Moreover, progressive ME and subchondral bone edema were associated with a more severe cartilage loss at the final follow-up. ConclusionMeniscal root repair did not halt but rather reduced the progression of osteoarthritis (OA). Degenerative changes worsened at a rapid rate in the PM group compared to the RR and CT groups. Early cartilage swelling, persistent subchondral edema, and progressive ME predicted a more severe progression to knee OA in the CT and RR groups. Level of evidenceII.

Item-Specific Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Characterization of Patients With Medial Meniscus Root Tear.

Most studies regarding medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) report total Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscale values as important patient-reported outcomes, but there are few symptom-specific characterizations of patients with MMPRT. The purpose of this study was to characterize the prevalence and severity of symptoms and functional limitations among patients with MMPRT based on item-level KOOS responses. It was hypothesized that patients with MMPRT would show similar symptoms to those of other meniscal tear types, with items from the KOOS pain subscale forming a majority of the most severe and prevalent symptoms. Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. The records of 1466 patients with medial meniscus root tear between January 2017 and December 2021 at a single institution were reviewed. KOOS subscale scores and item-specific responses from initial evaluation were collected for each patient. Each KOOS item was scored on a scale from 1 (none/least severe) to 5 (extreme/most severe). Median and mean item-level responses were calculated and ranked in order of most to least severe. For statistical analysis, item-level prevalence rates were calculated as the proportion of patients reporting at least mild symptoms and ranked from most to least prevalent. Included were 61 patients with MMPRT verified on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The most severe items according to item-level KOOS response were as follows: awareness of knee problem (mean, 4.62 [95% CI, 4.47-4.78]), difficulty jumping (mean, 4.06 [95% CI, 3.73-4.39]), difficulty twisting or pivoting (mean, 4.04 [95% CI, 3.76-4.32]), difficulty kneeling (mean, 3.98 [95% CI, 3.65-4.31]), and modification of lifestyle (mean, 3.94 [95% CI, 3.69-4.20]). The most prevalent items were knee stiffness later in the day, pain going up- or downstairs, difficulty ascending stairs, difficulty getting in and out of the car, difficulty twisting or pivoting, awareness of knee problem, and modification of lifestyle, with all patients reporting at least mild symptoms for each. Of the 11 most severe and prevalent symptoms, 8 came from the KOOS-Pain item-specific responses. Pain-related items made up a majority of the most severe and most prevalent symptoms as identified by the item-specific KOOS responses. However, meniscal symptoms commonly seen in other tear types, such as clicking and knee stiffness, were still quite prevalent in patients with MMPRT.

Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Reconstruction and Open-Wedge High-Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear With Varus Knee Alignment: A Retrospective Study on Short-Term Outcomes.

We describe13 cases of medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) with varus knee alignment treated with medial meniscus posterior root reconstruction (MMPR-R) and open-wedge high-tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) to identify an optimal MMPRT treatment. We retrospectively reviewed 13 patients (mean age: 66.3 ± 8.0 years) who underwent MMPR-R and OWHTO. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), femorotibial angle (FTA), percentage mechanical axis(%MA) on radiography, and medial meniscus extrusion (MME) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between the preoperative period and last follow-up were compared. Moreover, meniscus healing status and the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) classification of the medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau on arthroscopy between the initial surgery and second-look arthroscopy were compared. The mean follow-up duration was 12.8 ± 2.2 months. At the last follow-up, the KOOS significantly improved (P < 0.01). Based on the FTA and %MA, the varus alignment was predominantly corrected at the last follow-up (P < 0.01). The MME was increased in nine (62.9%) patients, and the mean MME significantly increased at the last follow-up (P = 0.04). Second-look arthroscopy revealed improvements in the ICRS grade for the medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau in six (46.2%) patients. However, the results did not significantly differ. Regarding meniscus healing, four (30.8%) patients presented with complete healing, eight (57.1%) with partial healing, and one (7.7%) with failed healing. The MMPRT with varus knee alignment significantly improved with MMPR-R and OWHTO. However, the MME and meniscus healing were unsatisfactory.

Longitudinal changes in medial meniscus extrusion and clinical outcomes following pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears: a 3-year evaluation

PurposeWe aimed to evaluate the longitudinal changes in medial meniscus extrusion (MME) and clinical scores at multiple time points up to 3 years after pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs).MethodsThis retrospective case series study included 64 patients who underwent pullout repair for MMPRTs and four MRI evaluations (preoperatively and at 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years postoperatively). MME was measured during the same time points. Clinical scores were assessed four times: preoperatively and at 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively. Additionally, a multivariate analysis was performed on the change in MME (ΔMME) from the preoperative measurement point to 3 years postoperatively.ResultsThe ΔMME per month from the preoperative measurement point to 3 months postoperatively, from 3 months to 1 year postoperatively, and from 1 to 3 years postoperatively were 0.30, 0.05, and 0.01 mm/month, respectively. All clinical scores significantly improved 3 years postoperatively (p < 0.001). In a multiple regression analysis for ΔMME from the preoperative measurement point to 3 years postoperatively, sex significantly affected the outcome (p = 0.039).ConclusionFollowing pullout repair for MMPRTs with well-aligned lower extremities, although MME progression could not be entirely prevented, the rate of progression decreased over time, and clinical scores improved. In particular, MME progressed markedly during the first 3 months postoperatively. Additionally, sex had a significant influence on MME progression, suggesting that males may be able to expand the indications of pullout repair for MMPRTs.

Seven tesla knee MRI T2*-mapping detects intrasubstance meniscus degeneration in patients with posterior root tears

Abstract Background Medial meniscus root tears often lead to knee osteoarthritis. The extent of meniscal tissue changes beyond the localized root tear is unknown. Purpose To evaluate if 7 Tesla 3D T2*-mapping can detect intrasubstance meniscal degeneration in patients with arthroscopically verified medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs), and assess if tissue changes extend beyond the immediate site of the posterior root tear detected on surface examination by arthroscopy. Methods In this prospective study we acquired 7 T knee MRIs from patients with MMPRTs and asymptomatic controls. Using a linear mixed model, we compared T2* values between patients and controls, and across different meniscal regions. Patients underwent arthroscopic assessment before MMPRT repair. Changes in pain levels before and after repair were calculated using Knee Injury &amp; Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Pain changes and meniscal extrusion were correlated with T2* using Pearson correlation (r). Results Twenty patients (mean age 53 ± 8; 16 females) demonstrated significantly higher T2* values across the medial meniscus (anterior horn, posterior body and posterior horn: all P &amp;lt; .001; anterior body: P = .007), and lateral meniscus anterior (P = .024) and posterior (P &amp;lt; .001) horns when compared to the corresponding regions in ten matched controls (mean age 53 ± 12; 8 females). Elevated T2* values were inversely correlated with the change in pain levels before and after repair. All patients had medial meniscal extrusion of ≥2 mm. Arthroscopy did not reveal surface abnormalities in 70% of patients (14 out of 20). Conclusions Elevated T2* values across both medial and lateral menisci indicate that degenerative changes in patients with MMPRTs extend beyond the immediate vicinity of the posterior root tear. This suggests more widespread meniscal degeneration, often undetected by surface examinations in arthroscopy.

Research progress on pathological mechanism and clinical correlation between medial meniscus posterior root tear and tibial rotation

To summarize the current research progress on the concept, clinical presentation, diagnosis, biomechanical changes, and pathological mechanisms of the medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT), and its clinical correlations with tibial rotation. The research literature on MMPRT and its relationship with tibial rotation at home and abroad in recent years was extensively consulted and summarized. MMPRT is a specific and common type of medial meniscus injury of the knee joint. The occurrence of posterior medial pumping pain events following low-energy trauma in patients provides important clues for the diagnosis of this injury, with MRI being the preferred imaging modality. The biomechanical effects generated by MMPRT are similar to those caused by total removal of the medial meniscus. And this injury is usually associated with tibial rotation. MMPRT induces pathological external rotation of the tibia, which can be restored by timely medial meniscus posterior root repair. Furthermore, changes in tibial rotation are related to the healing status after medial meniscus posterior root repair. MMPRT is closely related to tibial rotation. Understanding the biomechanics, pathological mechanisms, and clinical correlations between the two is of great significance for improving the diagnosis and treatment strategies.

Arthroscopic Transtibial Pullout Repair and Tibial Condylar Valgus Osteotomy for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear With Varus Knee

As an important structure for maintaining the hoop tension of the medial meniscus of the knee joint, the posterior root is receiving increasing attention. Medial meniscus posterior root tear is an important reason for the occurrence, development, and kinematics changes of knee osteoarthritis. It is necessary to repair the posterior root of meniscus for restoring joint kinematics and improving clinical efficacy. This Technical Note reports a medial meniscus posterior root tear repair technique using arthroscopic transtibial pullout repair (ATPR) combined with tibial condylar valgus osteotomy. The aim of this technique is to repair the posterior root of the medial meniscus while correcting the force line through osteotomy, opening the joint gap, improving the joint surface fit, providing a good mechanical environment for meniscus repair, thereby improving the healing rate of the posterior root of the meniscus and reducing the risk of retear. Although clinical evidence is currently limited, we believe that this technology may have more clinical advantages compared with ATPR alone or ATPR combined with high tibial osteotomy.

Increased Posterior Tibial Slope Is Associated With Increased Risk of Meniscal Root Tears: A Systematic Review.

While increased posterior tibial slope (PTS) is an established risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament tears, the association between tibial slope and meniscal posterior root tears is not well-defined. To summarize the available literature evaluating the association between PTS and meniscus root injuries compared with patients without root tears. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. A literature search was performed using the Scopus, PubMed, and Embase databases. Human clinical studies evaluating the associations between the medial tibial slope (MTS), lateral tibial slope (LTS), lateral-to-medial (L-to-M) slope asymmetry, and the risk of meniscus root tears were included. Patients with medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) and lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) were compared with a control group without root injury. Study quality was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies criteria. Ten studies with 1313 patients were included (884 patients with root tears; 429 controls). The LMPRT subgroup (n = 284) had a significantly greater LTS (mean ± SD, 7.3°± 1.5° vs 5.7°± 3.91°; P < .001), MTS (5.26°± 1.2° vs 4.8°± 1.25°; P < .001), and increased L-to-M asymmetry (2.3°± 1.3° vs 0.65°± 0.5°; P < .001) compared with controls. The MMPRT group (n = 600) had significantly increased MTS relative to controls (8.1°± 2.5° vs 4.3°± 0.7°; P < .001). Furthermore, there was a higher incidence of noncontact injuries (79.3%) and concomitant ramp lesions (56%) reported in patients with LMPRT. Increased MTS, LTS, and L-to-M slope asymmetry are associated with an increased risk of LMPRTs, while increased MTS is associated with MMPRTs. Surgeons should consider how proximal tibial anatomy increases the risk of meniscus root injury.

Superior outcomes of pullout repairs for medial meniscus posterior root tears in partial tear compared to complete radial tear

PurposeTo reveal the outcomes of partial medial meniscus posterior root tears following transtibial pullout repair compared with the outcomes of complete radial meniscus posterior root tears.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 15 consecutive patients (male/female, 5/10; average age, 64.4 years) who underwent transtibial pullout repair for partial medial meniscus posterior root tears and compared their results with those of 86 consecutive patients who underwent the same surgery for complete medial meniscus posterior root tears. All patients underwent second-look arthroscopy on average 1 year postoperatively, and a semi-quantitative meniscal healing score (anteroposterior width, stability, and synovial coverage, total 10 points) was evaluated. Medial meniscus extrusion was evaluated preoperatively and at second-look arthroscopy.ResultsPostoperative clinical scores were not significantly different in the short term. However, second-look arthroscopy revealed a significant difference in repaired meniscal stability (partial tear; 3.3 points, complete tear; 2.3 points, p < 0.001) and total meniscal healing scores (partial tear; 8.3 points, complete tear; 7.1 points, p < 0.001). Medial meniscus extrusion progression was significantly different (partial tear; 0.4 mm, complete tear; 1.0 mm, p < 0.001).ConclusionPartial medial meniscus posterior root tears showed better meniscal healing and less medial meniscus extrusion progression following pullout repair than complete medial meniscus posterior root tears.

Tunnel Overlap Occurs 25% of the Time With Simultaneous Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral Meniscal Root Repair

PurposeTo assess the risk of socket-tunnel overlap for posterior medial or lateral meniscal root repair combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using artificial tibias and computerized tomography (CT) scans for three-dimensional (3D) modeling. MethodsArtificial tibias (n=27; n=3/subgroup) were allocated to groups based on inclination of socket-tunnels (550, 600, 650) created for MMPR and LMPR repair, and ACLR. Three standardized socket-tunnels were created: one for the ACL and one for each posterior meniscal root insertion. CT scans were performed and sequentially processed using computer software to produce 3D models for assessment of socket-tunnel overlap. Statistical analysis was performed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Significance was set at p<0.05. ResultsThe present study found no significant risk of tunnel overlap when drilling for combined ACLR and MMPR repair, while seven cases of tunnel overlap occurred between ACL tunnels and LMPR (25.9% of cases). No subgroup or specific pattern of angulation consistently presented significantly safer distances than other subgroups for all distances measured. ConclusionThis study demonstrated 25.9% rate of overlap for combined LMPR repair and ACLR, compared to 0% for MMPR repair with ACLR. Lower ACL drilling angle (55 or 60 degrees) combined with higher lateral meniscus drilling angle (65 degrees) produced no socket-tunnel overlap. Clinical RelevanceSocket-tunnel overlap during meniscal root repair combined with ACLR may compromise graft integrity and lead to impaired fixation and treatment failure of either the ACL, the meniscus, or both. Despite this, risk for socket-tunnel overlap has not been well characterized.

Modified Mason-Allen vs Two Simple Stitch Fixation for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Various suture configurations are available for medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) repair. The modified Mason-Allen (MMA) technique has been proposed as a refixation technique for MMPRT instead of the conventional 2 simple stitches (TSS). This is in view of its superior biomechanical characteristics. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare MMA and TSS configuration techniques for MMPRT repair and identify any differences between the 2 techniques in terms of clinical outcomes, medial meniscal extrusion (MME), and postoperative healing. Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. The Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases were used to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria with the following search terms: ("meniscus" OR "meniscal injuries") AND ("Mason-Allen" OR "simple stitch" OR "suture techniques"). Data pertaining to all patient-reported outcome measures, postoperative complications, MME, postoperative healing, cartilage degeneration, and progression of knee osteoarthritis were extracted from each study. The pooled outcome data were analyzed using random- and fixed-effects models. After abstract and full-text screening, 6 clinical studies were included. In total, there were 291 patients; 160 underwent MMA fixation, and 131 underwent the TSS technique. The majority of studies had similar surgical techniques regarding repair technique, suture material, tibial fixation, and number and position of tibial tunnels. There were no differences between the groups in terms of patient-reported outcome measures at 14.2 months. Both techniques were also similar in the degree of postoperative MME and meniscal healing. Both suture configurations were equivalent in terms of clinical outcomes, the extent of meniscal extrusion, and postoperative healing. The TSS technique may offer advantages in terms of faster learning curve and shorter operative time. However, randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes, longer follow-up and assessment of chondral degeneration, and presence of knee osteoarthritis are required to assess whether a true difference exists, as the majority of included studies were limited by their retrospective design.