Posterior Lumbar Disc Research Articles

Case Report: Post Lumbar Discectomy Acute Iliac Arteriovenous Fistula; Endovascular Management and Literature Review

Posterior approach lumbar disc surgeries (LDS) can be associated with serious iatrogenic vascular complications which could be a serious life threatening condition. We report a rare case of right sided acute iliac vessels iatrogenic arteriovenous fistula (IAVF) which was diagnosed and managed in 24 hours duration in a 45 years old healthy female who underwent surgical posterior approach L4-5 discectomy. Intraoperative, she developed sudden hypotension, tachycardia, wide pulse pressure and acute drop of hemoglobin level without obvious operative site bleeding which raise the index of suspicion of vascular injury and urge the team for doing emergency CT angiography (CTA), vascular and endovascular team consultation for digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and endovascular management. Endovascular stenting is nowadays the modality of choice of intervention. We provide case report with literature review.

Horse Kick to the Abdomen Causing a Triad of Injury: A Case Report

A 35-year-old male, a horse trainer, was brought to the emergency room after being kicked in the abdomen, which resulted in an abdominal wall hematoma and a blow-out rupture of the proximal jejunum, with a mesenteric tear and posterior lumbar disc herniation. The initial evaluation did not raise significant concerns; however, the patient's abdominal pain progressively worsened after the administration of oral contrast in preparation for the computed tomography (CT) scan. The patient did well after abdominal exploration and operative repair of the small bowel injury. Our objective is to shed light on this mechanism of injury that can be underestimated during a patient's initial evaluation.

Posterior epidural disc fragment masquerading as spinal tumor: Review of the literature

Posterior epidural lumbar disc fragment is infrequent because of anatomical barriers, and it is difficult to diagnose posterior epidural lumbar disc fragment because of its rare incidence and the ambiguity of radiologic evaluations. And it is difficult to differentiate it from other diseases such as spinal tumors. Differential diagnosis of posterior epidural lumbar disc fragment is clinically important because its diagnosis can affect treatment and prognosis. To investigate the incidence, anatomical concern, etiology, symptom, diagnostic tool, management and prognosis of posterior epidural lumbar disc fragment, we reviewed articles including case report. We performed a search of all clinical studies of posterior epidural lumbar disc fragment published to date. The following keywords were searched: Posterior epidural lumbar disc fragment, disc migration, posterior epidural disc, extradural migration, dorsal epidural migration, sequestrated disc, and disc fragment. We identified 40 patients of posterior epidural lumbar disc fragment from 28 studies. The most common presentation of posterior epidural lumbar disc fragment was sudden onset radiculopathy (70.0%), followed by cauda equina syndrome (27.5%). The most frequently used diagnostic modality was magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), conducted in 36 cases (90.0%), and followed by computed tomography in 14 cases (35.0%). After the imaging studies, the preoperative diagnoses were 45.0% masses, 20.0% lesions, and 12.5% tumors. Characteristic MRI findings in posterior epidural lumbar disc fragment are helpful for diagnosis; it typically displays low signals on T1-weighted images and high signals on T2-weighted images with respect to the parent disc. In addition, most of the disc fragments show peripheral rim enhancement on MRI with gadolinium administration. Electrodiagnostic testing is useful for verifying nerve damage. Surgical treatment was performed in all cases, and neurologic complications were observed in 12.5%. As posterior epidural lumbar disc fragment could be masqueraded as spinal tumor, if rim enhancement is observed in MRI scans with sudden symptoms of radiculopathy or cauda equina syndrome, it should be taken into consideration. Early diagnosis can lead to early surgery, which can reduce complications.

Misdiagnosis of posterior sequestered lumbar disc herniation: report of three cases and review of the literature.

Posterior migration of sequestered disc is an extremely rare event that mimics more common spinal lesions as spinal tumors, making difficult its preoperative diagnosis and appropriate management. We retrospectively reviewed all lumbar disc herniations treated by surgery at our institution from 2006 to 2016 to identify cases with posterior sequestered disc fragments and possible misdiagnosis for other spinal lesions. Complementarily, a literature review of misdiagnosed cases of posterior migrated discs was undertaken. Three posterior sequestered lumbar disc cases (one intradural), were found among the 1153 reviewed surgeries. Two of them, presenting with progressive neurological deficit, were respectively misdiagnosed as pseudotumoral lesion and meningioma/neurogenic tumor on MRI. After intraoperative diagnosis and emergent resection, histology confirmed intervertebral disc tissue. The remaining case had an accurate preoperative diagnosis and after an initial conservative management finally underwent surgery because of refractory pain. Full recovery was achieved months after surgical treatment in all cases. Non-tumoral lesions are the most frequent misdiagnosis of posterior sequestered lumbar disc described in the literature. Early surgical treatment is the standard management due to high incidence of cauda equine syndrome (CES); however, spontaneous regression of posterior sequestered lumbar disc herniations has been recently reported. In conclusion low incidence and similar clinical and radiological features with other more common posterior spinal lesions like hematomas, synovial cyst or abscess turns posterior sequestered disc herniations a diagnosis challenge. Despite high incidence of CES, an initial conservative management should be evaluated in selected patients without neurological deficit and well-controlled pain.

Patients at the Highest Risk for Reherniation Following Lumbar Discectomy in a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background:The purposes of the present study were to (1) confirm the risk of recurrent lumbar disc herniation in patients with a large anular defect who had undergone limited discectomy and (2) assess potential risk factors within this population.Methods:The patient population was extracted from the control cohort of a prospective, randomized, multicenter controlled trial investigating the efficacy of an anular closure device following standard limited discectomy. All control patients underwent limited discectomy for the treatment of a single-level symptomatic posterior or posterolateral lumbar disc herniation. Only patients presenting with a large anular defect (6 to 10 mm wide by 4 to 6 mm long) were included in the study (n = 278). Baseline demographic, clinical, and surgical characteristics were recorded. Follow-up evaluations were performed at 6 weeks and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Imaging modalities included magnetic resonance imaging, low-dose computed tomography, and radiographs. Symptomatic recurrent lumbar disc herniation was defined as any symptomatic postoperative herniation on either side of the index level. A multivariate logistic regression analysis of demographic and surgical variables associated with the incidence of recurrent lumbar disc herniation was performed.Results:The mean anular defect area (and standard deviation) was 39.3 ± 9.1 mm2, and the mean excised nuclear tissue volume was 1.3 ± 0.8 mL. At 2 years, the incidence of symptomatic recurrent lumbar disc herniation was 25.3% (64 of 253), with the herniation occurring at a mean of 264 days after the index procedure. Of the 64 patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation, 36 underwent a subsequent surgical procedure. Logistic regression analysis identified an increased risk for recurrent lumbar disc herniation in females (odds ratio, 2.2) and in patients with greater anular defect widths (odds ratio, 1.3). Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed a significant interaction between age and sex (p = 0.005).Conclusions:The outcomes of the present study provide the most substantial evidence to date in confirming previous reports of a high risk of reherniation among patients with large anular defects. Among those with large anular defects (width, ≥6 mm), females ≤50 years of age had the highest risk (up to ∼10 times higher) of recurrent lumbar disc herniation. It is recommended that an anular repair or closure should be performed after limited discectomies in patients with large anular defects.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Vascular Complications Related to Posterior Lumbar Disc Surgery.

PurposeTo evaluate patients who underwent surgical or endovascular treatment after vascular injury related to posterior lumbar disc surgery.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed seven cases of vascular injuries (four lacerations, one arteriovenous fistula [AVF], and two pseudoaneurysms) related to lumbar disc surgery by a posterior approach from January 1997 to December 2016 at Chonnam National University Hospital. Information of patient characteristics, diagnosis, treatment strategies, and outcomes were analyzed.ResultsFive out of seven cases were inhospital cases. In three laceration cases, each patient instantly became hypotensive and a life-threatening arterial injury was suspected. Therefore, the patient was immediately turned to the supine position and surgical repair was performed. The patients with pseudoaneurysm and AVF were treated by endovascular intervention. Remaining two were referred cases under the impression of vascular injuries. One laceration case of them was in preshock condition, and the left common iliac artery was surgically repaired. The other referred patient showed pseudoaneurysm which was treated with stent graft insertion. There was no surgery or endovascular intervention related death and none of the patients suffered any sequela related to vascular injury.ConclusionVascular injury associated with posterior lumbar disc surgery is not common, but can be fatal. Early recognition, diagnosis, and prompt treatment are essential to prevent fatal outcomes. Recently, endovascular intervention is increasingly and preferably used because of its low morbidity and mortality. However surgery is still the best option for the patients with unstable vital sign and endovascular approach can be applied to stable patients.

A rare cause of ureteral injuries; simultaneous common iliac artery and ureter injury during posterior lumbar disc surgery

Major vascular injuries during lumbar disc surgery are rare but well-recognized complications. However, vascular injuries of the branches of the aorta and ureteral injuries are very rare. Although its incidence is not known definitely, it is estimated to be 1/1000. Ureteral injuries comprise less than 1% of all genitourinary traumas. In this article, we report clinical progress of a patient who had simultaneous internal iliac artery and ureteral injury during lumbar discectomy. The patient was managed with primary ureteroureterostomy. To our knowledge, this is the first case reported with simultaneous ureter and iliac artery trauma during lumbar disc surgery.

Modification of Classical Mckenzie Treatment for Grade I Lumbar Spondylolythesis with Posterior Lumbar Disc Protrusion

A suggested modification to the classical (Mechanical Diagnosis & Therapy (MDT) protocols of McKenzie) by substituting the flexion protocol with extension exercises treatment to be applied on grade (I) lumbar spondylolisthesis cases associated with posterior lumbar disc protrusion at level L4/5. This conclusion is supported by a proof case who was treated by extension exercises in 36 sessions of physiotherapy (in addition to the classical rehabilitation), and it was found that all her mechanical symptoms were improved, pain was decreased significantly, dynamic stability of the spine was increased, and signs of upper motor neuron lesion (UMNL) disappeared.

Nightmare of Lumbar Diskectomy

Case report. To present a rare case of a patient who during posterior lumbar spinal decompression and diskectomy underwent a laceration of the aorta. The patient survived with prompt treatment. Intraoperative injuries of the prevertebral and pelvic vessels are infrequent but serious complications of posterior lumbar disc surgery. Injury may cause laceration of the vessel with acute life-threatening retroperitoneal hemorrhage, which is usually massive. The aortic bifurcation is closely approximated to the anterior surface of the L4-L5 disc. A 70-year-old gentleman with prolapsed intervertebral disc between fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae and left-sided radiculopathy of L5 root was operated with L4-L5 laminectomy and L4-L5 diskectomy. During diskectomy, it was noticed by the surgeon that there was one episode of giving way of the pituitary rongeur anteriorly. However, no major bleeding was encountered from the disc space immediately after the event; vital signs were stable hemodynamically and we completed the diskectomy. Five minutes later, we noted the dural sac to have a collapsing pulsation. Prevertebral vessel injury was suspected. Patient became pulseless. We turned the patient supine for cardiopulmonary resuscitation without extubation. Vascular surgeons proceeded with laparotomy. Huge retroperitoneal hematoma and a 1.5 × 1.5 cm laceration at the bifurcation of aorta were noted anterior to the L4-L5 intervertebral disc. The vascular surgeon repaired the aorta by primary repair. The patient was extubated on day 5 and was allowed to ambulate. He was discharged subsequently with a normal neurological and vascular examination. No pseudoaneurysm or arteriovenous fistula formation was detected on magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography at 2 years follow-up. Iatrogenic vascular injury during posterior lumbar disc surgery, although rare, should be suspected if signs of circulatory instability or abnormal pulsation of the dural sac are noted, especially if any lapse in the ordinary technique has been observed. In preoperative imaging, note the position of the aorta and prevertebral veins and the depth and integrity of the anterior wall of the disc.

Arterio-venous fistula following a lumbar disc surgery

Vascular complications during posterior lumbar disc surgery are rare and its presentation with varicose veins is even rarer. A 23 year-old male patient presented with large varicose veins in right lower limb. He underwent a posterior lumbar spine discectomy surgery. He noticed mild swelling of the distal third right lower limb 3 months after index surgery and reported 6 months later when he developed varicose veins. Duplex Doppler confirmed varicose veins of the long saphenous vein and its tributaries with a patent deep venous system. A digital subtraction angiogram demonstrated a large right common iliac artery (CIA) false aneurysm with an arteriovenous fistula between right common iliac vessels. He had a right CIA covered stent insertion with good results. Varicose veins were later managed with sapheno-femoral junction ligation and a below knee long saphenous vein stripping. At six month follow-up the lower limb swelling had completely recovered and duplex ultrasound did not show any recurrence of varicose veins.

Higher risk of dural tears and recurrent herniation with lumbar micro-endoscopic discectomy

Existing studies on micro-endoscopic lumbar discectomy report similar outcomes to those of open and microdiscectomy and conflicting results on complications. We designed a randomised controlled trial to investigate the hypothesis of different outcomes and complications obtainable with the three techniques. 240 patients aged 18-65 years affected by posterior lumbar disc herniation and symptoms lasting over 6 weeks of conservative management were randomised to micro-endoscopic (group 1), micro (group 2) or open (group 3) discectomy. Exclusion criteria were less than 6 weeks of pain duration, cauda equina compromise, foraminal or extra-foraminal herniations, spinal stenosis, malignancy, previous spinal surgery, spinal deformity, concurrent infection and rheumatic disease. Surgery and follow-up were made at a single Institution. A biomedical researcher independently collected and reviewed the data. ODI, back and leg VAS and SF-36 were the outcome measures used preoperatively, postoperatively and at 6-, 12- and 24-month follow-up. 212/240 (91%) patients completed the 24-month follow-up period. VAS back and leg, ODI and SF36 scores showed clinically and statistically significant improvements within groups without significant difference among groups throughout follow-up. Dural tears, root injuries and recurrent herniations were significantly more common in group 1. Wound infections were similar in group 2 and 3, but did not affect patients in group 1. Overall costs were significantly higher in group 1 and lower in group 3. In conclusion, outcome measures are equivalent 2 years following lumbar discectomy with micro-endoscopy, microscopy or open technique, but severe complications are more likely and costs higher with micro-endoscopy.

Extreme-lateral lumbar disc herniations. Clinical syndrome and special problems of diagnosis.

✓ The authors believe that posterior lumbar disc herniations that occur far laterally (beneath, or beyond the facet) present a clinical picture and special problems of diagnosis different from those encountered with the usual herniations within the spinal canal. In a series of 204 consecutive disc operations, there were 24 “extreme-lateral” disc herniations at the second, third, or fourth lumbar interspace, none at the lumbosacral joint. When compared with the incidence of posterior herniations above the fourth interspace, it appeared that “extreme-lateral” herniations were responsible for the majority of second, third and fourth lumbar root compressions. The clinical syndrome is characterized by anterior thigh and leg pain, absent knee jerk, and sensory loss in the appropriate dermatome but also by the absence of back pain, typical back signs, or positive Lasegue's sign. Reproduction of pain and paresthesia by lateral bending to the side of the lesion is a reliable diagnostic sign. The authors report that myelography fails to disclose these lesions, while discography often proves helpful.

VERTEBRAL WEDGE OSTEOTOMY. CORRECTION OF RHEUMATOID (ANKYLOSING) SPONDYLITIS.

Rheumatoid (ankylosing) spondylitis occurs infrequently in women, in whom it appears to run a milder course. Though a rigid lumbar kyphosis is a common sequela of ankylosing spondylitis, only a small number of patients require osteotomy of the spine. The case is presented of a young woman on whom wedge osteotomy was performed successfully. A method of posterior vertebral body wedge resection for correction of lumbar kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis is described. The method consists of resection of a portion of the posterior neural elements, lumbar disc, and vertebral body with subsequent manipulation of the spine into extension. The principle of the modified surgical method prevents lengthening of the lumbar spine, thus eliminating stretching and injury to juxtaposed organs.