Posterior Interosseous Artery Flap Research Articles

Reliability and Versatility of Posterior Interosseous Artery Flap in Reconstructing Hand Soft Tissue Defects

Reliability and Versatility of Posterior Interosseous Artery Flap in Reconstructing Hand Soft Tissue Defects

Reliability and Versatility of Posterior Interosseous Artery Flap in Reconstructing Hand Soft Tissue Defects

Reliability and Versatility of Posterior Interosseous Artery Flap in Reconstructing Hand Soft Tissue Defects

Reconstruction of fracture associated skin defects on olecranon with antegrade posterior interosseous artery flap

<br><b>Context:</b> The management of tissue defects of the olecranon after fractures of this region is challenging. Most cases require local or free flaps to obtain both soft-tissue reconstruction and wide range of motion of the elbow joint. <b>Aim:</b> The aim of this study is to describe the results of reconstruction of fracture-associated skin defects on the olecranon with posterior interosseous artery (PIA) flap. <b>Settings and Design:</b> We present our experience of using antegrade PIA flap for soft-tissue coverage of the olecranon region after fracture surgery. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> We retrospectively evaluated 11 cases who underwent reconstruction of the olecranon for soft tissue defect with PIA flap. We evaluated the extent of the soft-tissue defects and the harvested flaps, fracture fixation techniques, complications, patients' demographics, partial or total flap lost, number of perforators, time to reconstruction after injury, esthetic looking of reconstructed area, and donor site coverage. <b>Results:</b> The study included 11 patients (7 males and 4 females). The mean age was 35 years. The mean defect size was 15.4 cm². The mean flap size was 20 cm². Plates were used in six cases, tension band wiring in three cases, and external fixators in two cases for fracture fixation. Ten flaps survived completely. There was partial flap necrosis in one flap due to venous congestion. Infection, hematoma, and distal neurological deficits were not observed. Minimal morbidity occurred since the donor site was primarily closed in eight cases and skin graft in three cases. Good cosmetic outcome was achieved in all cases. We detected one perforator in one case, two perforators in five cases, three perforators in four cases, and four perforators in one case. <b>Conclusion:</b> Reconstruction with PIA flap is an effective, useful, and simple surgical technique for soft-tissue coverage on the olecranon region. The procedure involves a single step surgery, low donor site morbidity, and good cosmetic outcomes.<br>

Comparison of lateral arm flap and posterior interosseous artery flap for soft tissue reconstruction of the elbow.

The study aimed to evaluate and compare the two different flap techniques used for the reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the elbow region: the lateral arm flap (LAA) and posterior interosseous artery (PIA) flap. The retrospective study included 12 patients who underwent surgical treatment for soft tissue defects between 2012-2018 at the clinic. The study evaluated demographic data, flap size, operating time, donor site, flap complications, number of perfora-tors, and functional and cosmetic outcomes. Results showed that patients who underwent PIA flap had significantly smaller defect size than those who underwent LAA flap (p<0.001). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups (p>0.05). Patients who received PIA flaps had significantly lower QuickDASH scores, indicating better functional results (p<0.05). The operating time was significantly shorter in the PIA group than in the LAA flap group (p<0.05). Additionally, the range of motion (ROM) of the elbow joint was significantly higher among the patients who received the PIA flap (p<0.05). The study concludes that both flap techniques are easy to apply depending on the surgeon's experience, have low complication risk, and provide similar functional and cosmetic results in similar defect sizes.

Soft tissue reconstruction of the thumb: Classification of defects and standardisation of treatment

The aim of this article is to share our experience of thumb defects based on the defect irrespective of the etiology of the defect and to work towards standardizing the treatment for thumb defects. This study was conducted at the Burns and plastic surgery center at Hayatabad Medical complex from 2018 to 2021. Thumb defects were divided into small (&lt; 3 cm), medium (4-8cm) and large defects (&gt; 9cm). Post-operatively, patients were evaluated for complications. The type of flaps were stratified for size and site of the soft tissue defects to generate a standardized algorithm for thumb soft tissue reconstruction. After scrutinizing the data, 35 patients qualified for the study, including 71.4% (25) males and 28.6% (10) females. The mean age was 31.17+15.8SD. Right thumb was affected in majority of the study population (57.1%). Majority of the study population was affected by machine injury and post-traumatic contractures, affecting 25.7% (n=9) and 22.9% (n=8) respectively. First web-space and injuries distal to IPJ of thumb were the most common areas affected, accounting for 28.6% (n=10) each. First dorsal metacarpal artery flap was the most common flap followed by retrograde posterior interosseous artery flap, observed in 11 (31.4%) and 6 (17.1%) cases. The most common complication observed in the study population was flap congestion (n=2, 5.7%) with a complete flap loss in 1 patient (2.9%) cases. Based on the cross tabulation of flaps against the size and location of defects, an algorithm was developed to help standardize reconstruction of thumb defects. Thumb reconstruction is critical in restoring hand function of the patient. The structured approach towards these defects make their assessment and reconstruction easy especially for novice surgeons. This algorithm can further be extended to include defects of the hand irrespective of etiology. Most of these defects can be covered with local easy to do flaps without the need for a microvascular reconstruction.

Evaluation of various options for resurfacing of soft-tissue defects of dorsum of hand and their outcome assessment

Background: Soft tissue defect of dorsum of hand is a difficult problem to deal with in reconstructive surgery. Various factors have to be considered for planning of the reconstruction. Aims and Objectives: To assess the overall incidence of soft tissue defect on dorsum of hand, evaluation of different options for coverage of soft tissue defect on dorsum of hand, assessment of outcome and complications (both primary and donor sites) of reconstructive procedures and coverage of defect with like for like tissue. Materials and Methods: We present our experience of resurfacing soft-tissue defects of dorsum of hand in 27 patients by split thickness skin grafting, local flaps, distant pedicled flaps, and free flaps. Results: Among total 27 patients, in whom resurfacing was done, distant pedicled flaps such as groin/abdominal flap were performed in 13 patients, regional flaps like posterior interosseous artery flap were done in seven patients, free flap like anterolateral thigh flap was the method in three patients, and skin grafting was used in two patients. Complications such as partial or complete flap necrosis were noted in one patient each of free and regional flap and none in distant pedicled flap. The operating time was relatively less in distant pedicled flaps. Conclusion: Skin grafting had limited use when underlying vital structures were exposed. Distant pedicled flaps such groin and abdominal flaps were very useful for resurfacing the defect especially in emergency situations. Regional and free flaps had limited indications.

Versatility and reliability of reverse posterior interosseous artery flap for coverage of soft tissue defects of hand and wrist.

Objective: To evaluate reverse PIA flap in reconstruction of various types of soft tissue defects of the hand in terms of reliability, flap survival, total duration of hospital stay, patient’s satisfaction and duration of return to work Study Design: Case Series study. Setting: Jinnah Burn and Reconstructive Surgery Center, Lahore. Period: January 2018 to July 2020. Material &amp; Methods: Twenty three posterior interosseous artery flaps were used for coverage in patients who had soft tissue defects over hand dorsum, wrist and first web space. Both sexes were included with age group ranging between 15 to 60 years. Results: Twenty two flaps, out of total 23 survived completely. In one patient, there was partial flap necrosis for which skin grafting was done. Donor sites were successfully covered with skin grafts. All patients went on to resume their work within a month or two and were quite satisfied with aesthetic outcome. Conclusion: A well planned reverse PIA flap is not only a safe, versatile and reliable option for coverage of hand defects but also entire has the benefit of a shorter hospital stay, allowing early return of patient to work and superior aesthetic outcome.

ALTERING THE MARKING OF THE REVERSE POSTERIOR INTEROSSEOUS ARTERY FLAP

BackgroundFull-thickness defects on the dorsum of the hand requires thin, soft, and pliable skin for which there are limited locoregional flaps. The reverse posterior interosseous artery (PIA) flap based on the communicating artery fulfills all above requirements and can reach upto the fingers. However, there has been discrepancy in the surface marking of the flap and the anatomical position of the vessel pedicle. We share our alteration with the marking and ease of harvesting this flap.Method and materialThis is a prospective study conducted at a private teaching hospital in Karachi, over a period of 2 years from November 2017 to December 2019. After taking consent and ensuring confidentiality of all patients who had PIA flap reconstruction, we collected patient's demographic details, mode of injury, and flap surface area. We altered the described skin marking and took measures to prevent venous congestion and noted the outcomes in term of flap congestion and flap loss.ResultsTwenty-eight patients with a mode age of 32 years were operated during this period. The majority (64.2%) had a motor vehicle accident and machine injuries. The mean surface area of flaps was 6 × 10 cm2, and 11 (39.2%) flaps had venous supercharging. All patients had a 10-20° wrist extension splint for 2 weeks. The mean follow-up of the patients was 14 ± 5 days, and 6 (21.4%) flaps developed a minimal marginal flap loss, which was managed conservatively.ConclusionBy minimally altering our surface marking, we experienced a easy and quick harvesting of this flap. However, one has to be vigilant and take all described precautions for venous congestion.

Use of the Antegrade Posterior Interosseous Artery Flap for Coverage of Complex Elbow Wounds.

One of the most versatile soft-tissue flaps available for elbow coverage that is reliable, quick, and easy to perform, with minimal donor defect and without the sacrifice of a major blood vessel, is the antegrade posterior interosseous artery flap. A large amount of vascularized fascia can be dissected with the flap, and it can be useful in lining the elbow joint or any exposed implant(s). After flap harvest, the donor site is often amenable to primary closure or requires a simple skin graft for closure. This article explains the technique for harvesting an antegrade posterior interosseous artery flap and describes 10 cases in which the flap was used for complex soft-tissue defects of the elbow not amenable to local wound care or skin grafting.

Technical Refinements in Posterior Interosseous Artery flap

Technical Refinements in Posterior Interosseous Artery flap

Versatility of the Posterior Interosseous Artery Flap: Emphasis on Powering Up the Toe Transfer.

Reverse-flow posterior interosseous artery (rPIA) flap is an excellent tool for restoration of defects in the hand and upper extremity, sparing the main arteries to the hand. Its reliability has been well established. Fifty-one cases of rPIA flap involving 49 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were age, sex, etiology, size and location of the defect, flap size, number of perforators included, pedicle length, flap inset, donor site coverage, complications, and ancillary procedures. This study included 44 men and 5 women, ranging in age between 10 and 73 years. The subjects had soft tissue defects of the hand and upper extremity mainly due to traumatic injuries, including scar contractures of the first web space in 18 cases, thumb amputations in 6 cases, and congenital defects in 1 case. Among the 51 rPIA flap elevations, 3 cases involved flap failure due to the absence of proper pedicle. A fasciocutaneous pattern was observed in 45 cases and a myocutaneous pattern in 3 cases. In 5 cases of unplantable thumb amputations, the rPIA flap was performed for arterial inflow to the secondary toe-to-thumb transfer. Venous congestion of varying degrees was noted in 7 cases involving partial necrosis in 2 cases. During the mean 17 months of follow-up, patients were generally satisfied with the final outcomes. The rPIA flap can be used not only for soft tissue coverage of the hand and upper extremity but also as a recipient arterial pedicle for a secondary toe-to thumb transfer.

The use of the posterior interosseous artery flap and anterolateral thigh flap for post-traumatic soft tissue reconstruction of the hand.

The purpose of this study was to examine the differences between the use of a posterior interosseous artery (PIA) flap and an anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap for post-traumatic, medium-sized soft tissue reconstruction of the hand based on flap characteristics, postoperative complications, and aesthetic outcomes.From October, 2010 to March, 2016, 62 patients undergoing soft tissue reconstruction of the hand with 30 PIA flaps and 32 ALT flaps were included in this study. The 62 patients were divided into the PIA flap group and the ALT flap group. The differences between the 2 groups were analyzed.The 62 patients included 52 males and 10 females, and the mean age at the time of surgery was 41 years. The flap failure rate was 13.3% (4/30) in the PIA flap group and 9.4% (3/32) in the ALT flap group. No significant differences in flap failure rate, recipient site complication rate, or donor site complication rate were observed between the 2 groups. However, the operative time (136 min vs 229 min) and aesthetic outcomes (flap bulk swelling, 0 cases vs 31 cases) were statistically significantly different.Both the pedicled PIA flap and the free ALT flap were comparable for the reconstruction of post-traumatic, medium-sized soft tissue defects of the hand according to the evaluated outcomes of postoperative complications. Based on the surgical characteristics of the flap and the evaluation of aesthetic outcomes, the pedicled PIA flap was significantly superior to the free ALT flap.

A Practical Tip for Intraoperative Perforator Vessel Selection

In planning of free-style free perforator flaps, relying on defined anatomical landmarks and preoperative imaging technologies is difficult to locate the perforating arteries. Situation gets more complicated when encountered multiple perforating arteries enter the small skin paddle. In these situations, the ideal perforator has to be selected mostly by clinical inspection. We would like to share our method for selecting the ideal perforating vessel in free-style perforator flaps by utilizing portable thermal camera, which may be a reliable intraoperative adjunct. An index digit soft-tissue reconstruction was planned with a free posterior interosseous artery flap. Preoperatively, two perforators were marked on intermuscular septum. After the skin island is elevated totally, both of the arteries were found to be of similar by means of caliber (&lt;0.8 mm) and pulsation. A cold challenge test was applied to flap and a continuous video record with thermal camera was taken for 1 min. Video record shows that the dominant perforator is the distal one. Thus, the flap was raised based on distal perforator. Postoperative follow-up was uneventful. The portable thermal imaging is a low cost and readily accessible intraoperative adjunct for selecting the dominant perforator in free-style perforator free flaps.

An extended distally based reverse posterior interosseous artery flap reconstruction for the thumb and distal defects of the fingers.

The reverse posterior interosseous artery flap is useful for covering hand defects. However, its major drawback is the short pedicle that limits the reach of the flap up to the metacarpophalangeal level. The authors performed a new modification extending the distal reach of the flap by including the recurrent branch of the posterior interosseous artery and they aimed to present the results of reconstruction with this technique. Seven patients with a mean age of 35.2 years (range 17-64 years) underwent extended RPIAF surgery. Six patients were admitted to the emergency department with isolated hand trauma. One patient was present in elective settings with chronic osteomyelitis and skin loss of the thumb related to previous trauma. The defects were located on the distal metacarpophalangeal level (thumb and other fingers). PIA perforators and the recurrent branch were included into the pedicle (Type A) in five cases, whereas the flap was harvested based solely on the recurrent branch (Type B) in two cases. The type B flaps had longer pedicle lengths due to discarding the forearm skin. The donor sites were covered with skin grafts in six patients. The average size of the extended RPIAF was 3 × 3.5 cm to 10 × 6 cm (mean 8.28 × 4.14 cm). All of the flaps completely survived, and no complications were encountered during the postoperative period. Functional recovery of the operated hands were observed during the follow up period 13.5 months (8-24 months). Both the patient and our satisfactory levels were high and all of the patients returned to their works. Quick DASH score was used in the final functional evaluation retrospectively. Due to the pandemic, the evaluation could be made with a telephone. Two patients could not be reached in the evaluation. The mean quick DASH score of five patients was 28.64. The extended RPIAF is a reliable choice in distally located thumb and finger defects if the recurrent branch of the posterior interosseous artery is included in the pedicle.

The posterior interosseous artery flap versus the adipofascial radial artery perforator flap in reconstruction of firecracker and homemade bomb blast injuries of the hand

Background: The soft tissues of the radial aspect of the hand are predominantly affected in firecracker and homemade bomb blast injuries. In such cases, regional flap options are quite appealing for defect coverage. We have compared the outcomes of using two pedicled regional forearm flaps in these injuries, the posterior interosseous artery flap (PIAF) and the adipofascial radial artery perforator flap (ARAPF).Methods: 37 patients underwent reconstruction of the hand with PIAF (20 cases) and ARAPF (17 cases) between January 2014 and December 2019. They were compared with regards to patient demographics, reconstruction techniques, short-term and long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes using the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score and the subjective satisfaction score (SSS).Results: All our flaps survived without any major complications affecting long-term outcome. We found no statistically significant difference between the two flaps in terms of patient demographics, flap paddle size, duration of hospital stay, DASH score and SSS for recipient site. However, significant difference was noted in the duration of surgery, method of donor site closure and SSS for the donor site.Conclusions: Both the PIAF and ARAPF can be considered in cases of soft tissue defects of the hand from firecracker or bomb blast injuries. Both preserve the major arteries of the hand while still having reliable vascular pedicle.

ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕ ЛОСКУТОВ ПРЕДПЛЕЧЬЯ ПРИ ТЯЖЁЛЫХ ТРАВМАХ ВЕРХНЕЙ КОНЕЧНОСТИ И ИХ ПОСЛЕДСТВИЯХ

Objective: Improving the outcomes of surgical treatment of upper limb (UL) injuries by using regional soft tissue flaps. Methods: The analysis of surgical interventions outcomes of integumentary tissue defects and forearm and hand structures of traumatic genesis was conducted in 37 patients. Traumatic injuries to the forearm and hand structures with soft tissue defects occurred in 11 patients, and 26 trauma patients were hospitalized. The patients had superficial soft tissue defects (STDs) involving various areas, accompanied by damage to the underlying neurovascular bundles (NVBs), tendons and bones. Results: Depending on the nature of trauma and the injured tissues’ state, the reconstruction sequence’s principle was followed. In 32 (86.5%) cases, the restoration of functional skin integument and reconstruction of injured anatomical structures of the limb were performed in a single stage. Twostage reconstruction was carried out in 5 (13.5%) patients, with initial STDs repair followed by reconstruction of the NVBs and tendons. Selection criteria for a sequence of surgical repair included the nature of the injury and the severity of the patient’s condition in emergencies. The following grafts were used: RFFF: radial forearm free flap (n=3); RRF: the reverse radial forearm flap (n=25); the ulnar reverse forearm flap (n=6), PIA: posterior interosseous artery flap (n=3). In the immediate postoperative period, compromised blood circulation in the transplanted flaps were observed in 2 (5.4%) cases. Timely diagnosis and treatment resulted in a positive outcome. Long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes of the reconstruction were considered acceptable in all patients. Conclusion: A proper surgical procedure selection for UL structures injuries and their consequences influences long term postoperative aesthetic and functional outcomes. Choice of single or multiple stages of reconstruction largely depends on the location of the defect, the state of the tissues in the recipient area and the nature of the injury to the underlying anatomical structures of the limb. Keywords: Upper limb, injuries and their consequences, soft-tissue defect, flaps.

The Role of Reverse Posterior Interosseous Artery Flap in Toe Transfer

BACKGROUND: Reverse posterior interosseous artery (rPIA) flap is an excellent tool for the restoration of defects in the hand and upper extremity. Its reliability and versatility are well established. Compared with the other forearm flaps, it spares the main arteries to the hand. Although very few case reports used the reverse radial forearm flap to provide arterial inflow for the toe-to-thumb transfer, the role rPIA flap in such cases has yet to be described. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five procedures involving 4 patients performed by a single surgeon to power up a toe-to-thumb transfer were reviewed. In all the cases, the first dorsal metatarsal artery was anastomosed to the transposed proximal posterior interosseous artery. RESULTS: Three patients underwent unilateral reconstruction and 1 patient had bilateral thumb base reconstruction using rPIA flaps. Secondary toe-to-thumb transfers were performed at 1–7 months after mounding up the thumb base with rPIA flaps. All the flaps and toe transfers survived completely without any partial necrosis. All patients were satisfied with the functional outcome as well as the appearance of the thumb. CONCLUSION: The use of the proximal posterior interosseous artery pedicle in rPIA flap is a safe and reliable procedure especially in cases involving traumatic loss of the thumb. In addition to the simple soft tissue coverage around the thumb base, the rPIA flap also provides a satisfactory arterial inflow during subsequent toe-to-thumb transfer.

Reverse Posterior Interosseous Artery Flap: A Reliable, Comfortable and Versatile Flap for Coverage of Soft Tissue Defects of Hand

Background: Soft tissue defects of the hands require coverage with soft, pliable full-thickness skin. The posterior interosseous artery (PIA) flap fulfils all these requirements and also has significant advantages over other flaps; it is a single-stage procedure that does not sacrifice major vascular axis of the hand. However, the dissection can be challenging and requires meticulous skill. The objective of the study was to evaluate the reverse PIA flap for coverage of hand soft tissue defects in terms of its safety, reliability, comfort, function and aesthetic appearance.Methods: Over a period of 3 years, patients with soft tissue defects over the dorsum of the hand and first web space were observed. A standard PIA flap was raised using loupe magnification under general or brachial anesthesia. The size and location of the defect were noted along with the size and success of the flap.Results: Twelve patients, including nine males and three females, were taken up for this procedure. All the flaps survived completely except one with marginal necrosis not requiring a secondary procedure. All patients were quite satisfied with the procedure and went on to resume their work within a month or two.Conclusion: PIA flap is a safe, reliable option with great versatility for coverage of hand defects, especially over the dorsum. A well-planned flap surgery done under loupe magnification affords excellent results. The entire treatment also requires a shorter hospital stay and allows the patient to return to work quickly.

Posterior Interosseous Artery Flap - Its Versatility

Posterior Interosseous Artery Flap - Its Versatility

Pedicled and Perforator Flaps in Reconstrucion of Post Trauma Defects in Upper Limbs.

Background: Upper extremity soft tissue reconstruction is an extensive topic as a multitude of options exist for diverse soft tissue defects involving shoulder, arm, elbow, forearm, wrist, and hand. Many of the times flap cover is necessary for resurfacing exposed critical structures like tendons, neurovascular structures, bone and to provide supple tissue over joints. Pedicled and perforator flaps are seen in last years as a good choice to restore length, sensitivity and function of the injured upper limb.&#x0D; The aim of this paper is to give an overview of the definitions of as well as to present our experience regarding pedicled and perforator flaps.&#x0D; Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of 15 trauma patients who underwent pedicled and perforator flaps during the 2012-2016 timeframe period was made. The patients were divided according to their type of injury, as well as the types of flasp that were used.&#x0D; Results: We have performed in total: 7 Foucher’s flaps, 4 Posterior Interosseous Artery flaps, 1 Radial Recurrent Artery flap, 1 Quaba flap, 1 SDMA flap. We had only two cases of partial necrosis of the flaps and all the others survived completely.&#x0D; Conclusions: Every single flap elevated successfully is linked with a meticulous surgical technique. We should take a special care in pedicle positioning because pedicle strangling was the most important negative factor in our two flap partial necrosis. Understanding the mistakes will help us to improve our surgical techniques day after day.