Posterior Cervical Spine Fusion Research Articles

Clinical Implementation of Tissue-Sparing Posterior Cervical Fusion: Addressing Market Access Challenges.

Background: The traditional open midline posterior cervical spine fusion procedure has several shortcomings. It can cause soft tissue damage, muscle atrophy, compromise of the lateral masses and painful prominent posterior cervical instrumentation or spinous process if there is dehiscence of the fascia. Additionally, patients frequently experience the rapid development of adjacent segment disease, which can result in the reemergence of debilitating pain and functional impairment. Clinical relevance: Tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion is an alternative method for treating patients with symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease. However, widespread clinical adoption has been challenged by ambiguity, misunderstandings and misinterpretations regarding appropriate procedural reimbursement coding. Technological advancement: The tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion procedure was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2018 (CORUS™ Spinal System and CAVUX® Facet Fixation System (CORUS/CAVUX); Providence™ Medical Technology). This technique addresses the concerns with traditional spine fusion methods by achieving the stability and outcomes of posterior cervical fusion without the morbidity associated with significant muscle stripping in the traditional approach. This technology uses specialized implants and instrumentation to perform all of the steps required to facilitate bone fusion and provide stability while minimizing tissue disruption. The technique involves extensive bone preparation for fusion and placement of specialized stabilization implants that span the facet joint, promoting natural bone growth and fusion while reducing the need for extensive exposure. This procedure provides an effective, less invasive solution for patients with cervical degenerative disc disease. Reimbursement and coding clarity: The article provides a comprehensive rationale for appropriate reimbursement coding for tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion. This is a critical aspect for the adoption and accessibility of medical technologies. This information is crucial for practitioners and healthcare administrators, ensuring that innovative procedures are accurately coded and reimbursed. Procedural details and clinical evidence: By detailing the procedural steps, instruments used and the physiological basis for the procedure, this article serves as a valuable educational resource for spine surgeons and payers to appropriately code for this procedure. Conclusions: The description of work for CORUS/CAVUX is equivalent to the current surgical standard of lateral mass screw fixation with decortication and onlay posterior grafting to facilitate posterior fusion. Thus, it is recommended that CPT codes 22600/22840 be used, as they best reflect the surgical approach, instrumentation, decortication, posterior cervical fusion and bone grafting procedures.

A comparison of dysphagia rates between long-segment anterior versus posterior cervical fusion.

The goal of this study was to compare rates of dysphagia and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following long-segment (≥ 3 levels) anterior cervical spinal fusion (ACF) and posterior cervical spinal fusion (PCF) at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. PROs were also compared for patients with dysphagia versus those without dysphagia. A prospectively collected quality improvement database was used to identify patients who had a long-segment cervical spinal fusion. Cohorts were divided into ACF and PCF groups. Eating Assessment Tool-10 scores and PROs were obtained for all patients preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively to compare. Multivariate analysis was also performed to evaluate risk factors for dysphagia. A total of 132 patients met the inclusion criteria, 77 of whom had undergone ACF and 55 of whom had undergone PCF. Dysphagia rates between ACF and PCF cohorts were similar at baseline (13.0% vs 18.2%, p = 0.4). New-onset dysphagia rates were also comparable at 3-month follow-up (39.7% vs 23.1%, p = 0.08) and 12-month follow-up (32.6% vs 32.4%, p > 0.99). Patients who underwent PCF had worse Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores at 3 months than did patients with ACF (13.67 ± 9.49 vs 10.55 ± 6.24, respectively; p = 0.03). There were significantly higher NDI scores for patients with dysphagia at 3 months in both the ACF and PCF groups and at 12 months for those in the PCF group. Analogously, EuroQol-5 Dimensions scores were worse for patients with dysphagia; however, this was only significant for patients in the ACF group at 3 months. There were no significant risk factors for the development of dysphagia found on multivariate analysis. Similar rates and severity of dysphagia were seen following ACF and PCF at 3- and 12-month follow-up. This suggests that long-term dysphagia following cervical fusion surgery may be due to structural changes from the fusion rather than the surgical approach. However, the ACF cohort was significantly younger, and this may have partially accounted for the findings. PROs were also compared for patients with and without dysphagia, demonstrating worsened outcomes in some domains for patients who presented with dysphagia at 3- and 12-month follow-up. This suggests that dysphagia may be associated with a decreased quality of life after cervical fusion.

A novel technique for C1-C2 posterior screw insertion using patient-specific guides created by CT-based 3D printing.

C1-C2 fixation has been developed for the rigid fusion of atlantoaxial instability. C1 lateral mass screw (C1 LMS)-C2 pedicle screw fixation is used more frequently due to its rigid fixation and high bone fusion rate. However, C1 screw placement is relatively unsafe even with recently developed image-based navigation systems. Patient-specific screw guide templates (PSGT) were developed to improve the accuracy and safety of C1 screw placement. Herein, we investigated the outcomes of the C1-C2 posterior fixation technique using PSGT. This was a retrospective study of six patients who underwent posterior cervical spinal fusion using the PSGT between January 2022 and April 2023. Operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative radiation dose, surgical cost, and screw placement accuracy were evaluated and compared with those achieved with preoperative CT-based navigation (navigation group, n = 15). Screw accuracy was assessed using Neo's classification. PSGT showed good results, although the differences were not statistically significant (operation time: 104.3 ± 9.7 min vs 116.4 ± 20.8 min; estimated blood loss: 56.7 ± 72.4 mL vs 123.2 ± 162.3 mL; and radiation dose: 1.8 ± 1.2 mSv vs 2.6 ± 0.8 mSv, respectively). PSGT was particularly better in terms of the accuracy of C1 LMS (PSGT: 100%, navigation: 83.3%). The deviation at the entry point was minimal, and the difference between the sagittal and transversal angles from the preoperative plan was small. We investigated the clinical efficacy of using the PSGT for C1-C2 posterior fixation. PSGT improved the accuracy of C1 LMS insertion.

The Efficacy of Cervical Pedicle Screw Is Enhanced When Used With 5.5-mm Rods for Metastatic Cervical Spinal Tumor Surgery.

The cervical spine presents challenges in treating metastatic cervical spinal tumors (MCSTs). Although the efficacy of cervical pedicle screw placement (CPS) has been well established, its use in combination with 5.5-mm rods for MCST has not been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CPS combined with 5.5-mm rods in treating MCST and compare it with that of CPS combined with traditional 3.5-mm rods. This retrospective study analyzed 58 patients with MCST who underwent posterior cervical spinal fusion surgery by a single surgeon between March 2012 and December 2022. Data included demographics, surgical details, imaging results, numerical rating scale score for neck pain, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire responses. Preoperative Spinal Instability Neoplastic Scores were significantly higher in the 5.5-mm rod group. Greater kyphotic changes in the index vertebra were observed in the 3.5-mm rod group. Neck pain reduction was significantly better in the 5.5-mm rod group. CPS with 5.5-mm rods provides superior biomechanical stability and effectively resists forward bending momentum in posterior MCST fusion surgery. These findings support the use of 5.5-mm rods to enhance surgical outcomes.

Association of Hyperlipidemia With Perioperative Complications in Posterior Cervical Spine Fusion: A Comparative Retrospective Study.

A retrospective database study. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the impact of hyperlipidemia (HLD) on the incidence of perioperative complications associated with posterior cervical spine fusion (PCF). HLD is a very common disease that leads to atherosclerosis. Therefore, it can cause fatal diseases as well as lifestyle-related diseases. The possible impact of HLD on outcomes after PCF has not yet been investigated. Patients with cervical degeneration underwent initial PCF from 2010 through the third quarter of 2020 using the MSpine subset of the PearlDiver Patient Record Database. The incidence of perioperative complications was queried using relevant ICD-9, 10, and CPT codes. χ 2 analysis was performed in age-, sex-, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)-matched populations to compare between non-HLD and HLD patients in each single-level and multilevel PCF. Through propensity score matching, 1600 patients each in the HLD and non-HLD groups were analyzed in the single-level PCF, 6855 patients were analyzed in the multilevel PCF were analyzed. The comorbidity of HLD significantly decreased the incidence of respiratory failure in single-level PCF (OR=0.58, P <0.01). In the multilevel PCF, the presence of HLD increased the incidence of cervicalgia (OR=1.26, P =0.030). On the contrary, the incident of spinal cord injury (OR=0.72, P <0.01), dysphagia (OR=0.81, P =0.023), respiratory failure (OR=0.85, P =0.030), pneumonia (OR=0.70, P =0.045), neurological bladder (OR=0.84, P =0.041), and urinary tract infection (OR=0.85, P =0.021) in the HLD group were significantly lower than those in non-HLD group. In the current study, the presence of HLD significantly increased the incidence of postoperative cervicalgia in multilevel PCF. On the other hand, the incidence of some complications was significantly decreased with HLD. Further studies are needed taking into account other factors such as the treatment of HLD, its efficacy, and intraoperative events. Level III.

Biomechanical Analysis of Multilevel Posterior Cervical Spinal Fusion Constructs.

Controlled Laboratory Study. To compare multilevel posterior cervical fusion (PCF) constructs stopping at C7, T1, and T2 under cyclic load to determine the range of motion (ROM) between the lowest instrumented level and lowest instrumented-adjacent level (LIV-1). PCF is a mainstay of treatment for various cervical spine conditions. The transition between the flexible cervical spine and rigid thoracic spine can lead to construct failure at the cervicothoracic junction. There is little evidence to determine the most appropriate level at which to stop a multilevel PCF. Fifteen human cadaveric cervicothoracic spines were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: PCF stopping at C7, T1, or T2. Specimens were tested in their native state, following a simulated PCF, and after cyclic loading. Specimens were loaded in flexion-extension), lateral bending, and axial rotation. Three-dimensional kinematics were recorded to evaluate ROM. The C7 group had greater flexion-extension motion than the T1 and T2 groups following instrumentation (10.17±0.83 degree vs. 2.77±1.66 degree and 1.06±0.55 degree, P <0.001), and after cyclic loading (10.42±2.30 degree vs. 2.47±0.64 degree and 1.99±1.23 degree, P <0.001). There was no significant difference between the T1 and T2 groups. The C7 group had greater lateral bending ROM than both thoracic groups after instrumentation (8.81±3.44 degree vs. 3.51±2.52 degree, P =0.013 and 1.99±1.99 degree, P =0.003) and after cyclic loading. The C7 group had greater axial rotation motion than the thoracic groups (4.46±2.27 degree vs. 1.26±0.69 degree, P =0.010; and 0.73±0.74 degree, P =0.003) following cyclic loading. Motion at the cervicothoracic junction is significantly greater when a multilevel PCF stops at C7 rather than T1 or T2. This is likely attributable to the transition from a flexible cervical spine to a rigid thoracic spine. Although this does not account for in vivo fusion, surgeons should consider extending multilevel PCF constructs to T1 when feasible. Not applicable.

Chemoprophylaxis Timing Is Not Associated With Postoperative Bleeding After Spinal Trauma Surgery

BackgroundLittle is known regarding appropriate timing for chemical venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis initiation in operative traumatic spinal injuries. We hypothesized that the incidence of post-operative bleeding leading to neurological decline or re-operation would not increase in patients who received early VTE prophylaxis (≤2 days post-surgery) as compared to those who received late VTE prophylaxis (≥ 3 days post-surgery). MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study. Spine trauma patients who underwent spinal surgery, defined as anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, posterior cervical spinal fusion, anterior or posterior thoracic/lumbar spinal fusion, or vertebral percutaneous fixation from July 2015 to July 2020 were included. Demographics, pre-injury anti-thrombotics, operative characteristics, pre- and post-operative VTE prophylaxis, and post-operative complications, including spinal bleeding, and VTE were collected. Univariate analysis was performed, comparing baseline characteristics, VTE prophylaxis timing, and complications between the early and late groups. ResultsTwo-hundred-eighty-two patients were included; 189 were in the early group (1.7 ± 0.5 days), and 93 were in the late (4.4 ± 2.1 days) group. The late group received enoxaparin more often than patients in the early group (41.9 % vs. 19 %, p < 0.001). Baseline characteristics, hospital course, and surgical management were similar between the groups. The rate of post-operative complications, including hematoma and VTE was similar between the groups. None of the patients in the early group had post-operative bleeding. ConclusionIn this retrospective cohort study, VTE prophylaxis timing was not associated with clinically significant post-operative spinal bleeding and VTE in trauma patients.

Accuracy of Lateral Mass Screw Insertion during Cervical Spine Surgery without Fluoroscopic Guidance and Comparison of Postoperative Screw Loosening Rate among Unicortical and Bicortical Screws Using Computed Tomography.

Pedicle screws (PSs) or lateral mass screws (LMSs) are used in posterior cervical spine fixation. The former are more firmly fixed but are associated with the risk of neurovascular injury and should be inserted using intraoperative imaging or navigation, which may prolong the surgical duration and is not feasible in all hospitals. This prospective clinical study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of LMS insertions without fluoroscopic guidance and screw loosening rates at 6 months postoperatively using computed tomography (CT). We examined 38 patients who underwent posterior cervical spine fusion using 206 LMSs in the C3-C6 range between January 2018 and July 2021. The direction of screw insertion followed the Magerl method, and we inserted screws as bicortically as possible without intraoperative imaging. The screw position was examined using CT at 1 week postoperatively. Screw insertion angles, bicortical insertion rate, facet violation, and neurovascular injury were evaluated. Screw loosening with unicortical and bicortical screws (US and BS, respectively) was investigated using CT at 6 months postoperatively. The average LMS length was 14.1 mm. The average axial and sagittal angles were 33.9° and 29.2°, respectively. Among the 206 LMSs inserted, 167 were BS; of these, 94.6% had screw length protrusion of 0-2 mm. Facet violation was observed in 3.4% of all screws but without neurovascular injury. Six months postoperatively, loosening of 25 screws (12.1%) occurred, including 17 (18.3%) USs and 8 (8.39%) BSs. The screw loosening rate was significantly higher in US than for BS (43.6% [17/39] vs. 4.8% [8/167], P<0.01). Over 80% of LMSs were inserted bicortically without intraoperative imaging. By devising the screw length selection process, we inserted for screw loosening was more common in US and more likely at the fixed end.

Sugammadex and blood loss during cervical spine fusion surgery.

Sugammadex (SUG) has been associated with changes in coagulation studies. Most reports have concluded a lack of clinical significance based on surgical blood loss with SUG use at the end of surgery. Previous reports have not measured its use intraoperatively during ongoing blood loss. Our hypothesis was that the use of SUG intraoperatively may increase bleeding. This was a single site retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing a primary posterior cervical spine fusion, aged over 18 years, between July 2015 and June 2021. The primary outcomes compared were intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL) and postoperative drain output (PDO) between patients receiving SUG, neostigmine (NEO) and no NMB reversal agent. The objective was to determine if there was a difference in primary endpoints between patients administered SUG, NEO or no paralytic reversal agent. Primary endpoints were compared using analysis of variance with a P value of 0.05 used to determine statistical significance. Groups were compared using the Chi-squared test, rank sum or student's t test. A logistic regression model was constructed to account for differences between the groups. There was no difference in median EBL or PDO between groups. The use of SUG was not associated with an increase in odds for >500 milliliters (ml) of EBL. Increasing duration of surgery and chronic kidney disease were both associated with an increased risk for EBL >500 ml. Intraoperative use of SUG was not associated with increased bleeding. Any coagulation laboratory abnormalities previously noted did not appear to have an associated clinical significance.

Severe dysphagia after a posterior cervical spine fusion at the C1–C3 level and its improvement after correction surgery for malalignment: a case report

BackgroundThe development of dysphagia and trismus following posterior C1–C3 fusion is rare compared to occipitocervical fusion, and there are very few reports in the literature.Case presentationA 75-year-old Thai man who had an extradural tumor at the C1/C2 level developed severe dysphagia and trismus immediately after tumor resection and C1–C3 fusion. During the surgery for malalignment correction, the C1–C2 screws were re-aligned into an increased lordotic position. The symptoms resolved immediately post-surgery.ConclusionsShort upper cervical fusion can produce trismus and dysphagia in a relatively flexed position. Preoperative planning should be individualized based on the patient’s resting neutral alignment to prevent complications.

Change in the Alignment and Distal Junctional Kyphosis Development after Posterior Cervical Spinal Fusion Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy - Risk Factor Analysis.

ObjectiveThis study analyzed the risk factors in patients who developed distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) after posterior cervical fusion. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 64 patients, aged ≥18 years (51 and 13 male and female patients, respectively), who underwent single-staged multilevel (3–6 levels) posterior cervical fusion surgery due to multiple cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The surgeries were performed by a single spinal surgeon between January 2012 and December 2017. Demographic data, clinical outcomes, and radiological results were collected. We divided the patients into a DJK group and a non-DJK group according to the presence of DJK and investigated the risk factors by comparing the differences between the two groups. ResultsOf the 64 patients, 13 developed DJK. No significant differences in clinical results were observed between the two groups before and immediately after the surgery. At the final follow-up, a higher visual analog score for neck pain was observed in the DJK group compared to the non-DJK group (p<0.01). The DJK group had a significantly lower T1 slope and a significantly higher C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) before surgery compared to the non-DJK group (p=0.03 and p<0.01, respectively). Immediately after surgery, the difference between the two groups decreased and no significant difference was observed. However, at the last followup, a significantly higher C2-7 SVA was observed in the DJK group (p<0.01). At the last follow up, there is no discrepancy in T1S-CL. In multiple logistic regression analysis, preoperative higher C2-7 SVA and preoperative lower T1 slope were identified as independent risk factors (p=0.03 and p<0.01, respectively). As a result, it was confirmed that DJK occurred along the process of returning to preoperative values. ConclusionDJK can be considered to be caused by cervical misalignment due to excessive change in the surgical site in patients with low T1 slope and high C2-7 SVA before surgery. This also affects the clinical outcome after surgery. It is recommended to refrain from excessive segmental lordosis changes during multilevel cervical post fusion surgery, especially in patients with a small preoperative T1 slope and a large SVA value.

ACDF and posterior spinal fusion revision for posterior nonunion with deformity, myelopathy, and osteoporosis in an 87-year-old: A case report and literature review.

IntroductionCervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a spinal degenerative disorder that can ultimately lead to compression of the vertebral column with neurological sequelae. Although CSM is the most common spine pathology in the elderly American population, it remains a challenging disorder to treat among older patients.Case presentationWe report an 86 year old female patient with CSM with a history of posterior cervical fusion attempt on C3-C6 that progressed to C3-C6 nonunion with loose instrumentation. The patient had severe osteoporosis. With these indications, the patient underwent a combined anterior-posterior decompression and fusion (CAPDF) consisting of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) of the C3-C5, corpectomy of C6 and C7 with off FDA label use of polymethyl methacrylate augmentation (PMMA) fixation of T1 screws anteriorly for C3-T1 plate fixation and second stage instrumented posterior spinal fusion (PSF) of C3-T3. The patient had a successful fusion and reduction of her cervical spine pain with preservation of her neurological status.DiscussionWe report this case of multi-stage combined anterior and posterior fusion as a corrective measure for pseudarthrosis of a prior posterior cervical spinal fusion attempt.ConclusionIn the event of posterior spinal fusion instrumentation failure in patients with severe osteoporosis, combined multi-stage anterior-posterior fusion is a viable corrective intervention in octogenarians. This case also illustrated the utility of using PMMA for anterior cervical plate and screw stabilization in osteoporotic bone. The authors are not aware of the prior use of PMMA for screw fixation augmentation in the anterior cervical spine.

Retro-odontoid pseudotumor concomitant with proximal adjacent cervical spondylotic myelopathy after multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Introduction and importanceAdjacent cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) presenting as a retro-odontoid pseudotumor (ROP) is uncommon. This consequence adversely affects hand function, causes gait imbalance and results in other disabilities for the patient. This report describes the successful surgical treatment of a patient with ROP associated with adjacent CSM following multilevel ACDF of the subaxial cervical vertebrae by performing posterior cervical decompression and fusion.Case presentationA 60-year-old-male presented with progressive, disabling cervical myelopathy. He had undergone ACDF C3-C7 for treatment of CSM 16 years ago and his symptoms had fully resolved. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed severe cervical spinal cord compression caused by a retro-odontoid mass at the C1-C2 level with upper adjacent segment disease (ASD) of C1-C3. The patient received C1-C3 posterior cervical spinal fusion by C1 lateral mass C2 and C3 pedicle screw fixation and C1-C3 laminectomy. After the surgery, he was able to ambulate independently and the myelopathic symptoms were significantly improved at the 6 months follow-up.Clinical discussionRetro-odontoid pseudotumor concomitant with proximal ASD following ACDF is a rare occurrence. Both diagnosis and surgical management are challenging.ConclusionsPosterior cervical decompression and fusion of C1-C3 is an effective option for treatment of severe cervical spinal cord compression by a retro-odontoid mass at the C1-C2 level combined with ASD after ACDF.

Machine learning-driven identification of novel patient factors for prediction of major complications after posterior cervical spinal fusion.

Posterior cervical fusion is associated with increased rates of complications and readmission when compared to anterior fusion. Machine learning (ML) models for risk stratification of patients undergoing posterior cervical fusion remain limited. We aim to develop a novel ensemble ML algorithm for prediction of major perioperative complications and readmission after posterior cervical fusion and identify factors important to model performance. This is a retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent posterior cervical fusion at non-federal California hospitals between 2015 and 2017. The primary outcome was readmission or major complication. We developed an ensemble model predicting complication risk using an automated ML framework. We compared performance with standard ML models and logistic regression (LR), ranking contribution of included variables to model performance. Of the included 6822 patients, 18.8% suffered a major complication or readmission. The ensemble model demonstrated slightly superior predictive performance compared to LR and standard ML models. The most important features to performance include sex, malignancy, pneumonia, stroke, and teaching hospital status. Seven of the ten most important features for the ensemble model were markedly less important for LR. We report an ensemble ML model for prediction of major complications and readmission after posterior cervical fusion with a modest risk prediction advantage compared to LR and benchmark ML models. Notably, the features most important to the ensemble are markedly different from those for LR, suggesting that advanced ML methods may identify novel prognostic factors for adverse outcomes after posterior cervical fusion.

Posterior Floating Laminotomy as a New Decompression Technique for Posterior Cervical Spinal Fusion Surgery.

ObjectiveIn the cervical spine, many surgical procedures have been developed to achieve optimal results for various disorders, including degenerative diseases, traumatic injury, and tumor. In this study, we report our experience and follow-up results with a new surgical technique for cervical spine entitled posterior floating laminotomy (PFL) in comparison with conventional laminectomy and fusion (LF). MethodsData for 85 patients who underwent conventional LF (n=66) or PFL (n=19) for cervical spine disorders between 2012 and 2019 were analyzed. Radiological parameters, including cervical lordosis (CL), T1 slope (T1S), segmental lordosis (SL), and C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), were measured with lateral spine X-rays. Functional outcomes, comprising the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA), neck disability index (NDI), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores, were also measured. For the patients who underwent PFL, postoperative magnetic resonance image (MRI) was performed in a month after the surgery, and the degree of decompression was evaluated at the T2-weighted axial image, and postoperative computed tomography (CT) was conducted immediately and 1 year after the operation to evaluate the gutter fusion. ResultsThere was no difference in CL, T1S, SL, and C2–7 SVA between the groups but there was a difference in the preoperative and postoperative SL angles. The mean difference in the preoperative SL angle compared with that at the last follow-up was -0.3° after conventional LF and 4.7° after PFL (p=0.04), respectively. mJOA, NDI, and VAS scores showed significant improvements (p<0.05) during follow-up in both groups. In the PFL group, postoperative MRI showed sufficient decompression and postoperative CT revealed gutter fusion at 1 year after the operation. ConclusionPFL is a safe surgical method which can preserve postoperative CL and achieve good clinical outcomes.

P126. Development of a novel ensemble machine learning algorithm for prediction of complications and readmission after posterior cervical spinal fusion

<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> Cervical spinal fusion is one of the most commonly performed surgeries in the United States and is rapidly growing in prevalence. The average age and comorbidity burden of patients undergoing cervical fusion has also increased, elevating the risk of perioperative complications and unplanned readmissions. Given the cost and morbidity associated with these poor outcomes, accurate preoperative risk stratification is of great utility. Advanced machine learning (ML) methods have become increasingly employed in spinal surgery due to their ability to recognize complex, non-linear relationships between variables. ML models for preoperative risk stratification of patients undergoing posterior cervical fusion remain limited. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> We aim to develop a novel ensemble ML algorithm for prediction of major perioperative complication and unplanned readmission after posterior cervical fusion. Our secondary aim is to compare its performance against benchmark ML models and logistic regression (LR). <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> Retrospective, cohort study. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> Patients 18 years or older at a non-federal California hospital who underwent posterior cervical spinal fusion. <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> Readmission within 30 days, major perioperative complications (venous thromboembolism within 30 days, myocardial infarction within 7 days, pneumonia within 7 days, systemic infection within 7 days, surgical site bleeding within 90 days, and wound complications within 90 days). <h3>METHODS</h3> This is a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent instrumented or non-instrumented posterior cervical spinal fusion at any California hospital between 2015-2017. We developed a ML-based model predicting complication risk using AutoPrognosis, an automated ML framework that configures the optimally performing ensemble of ML-based prognostic models. We compared our model with LR and four standard ML models (XGBoost, Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, Random Forest). Predictive performances were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). We ranked the contribution of the included variables to model performance. <h3>RESULTS</h3> Of the 6,822 patients who met inclusion criteria, there were 1,279 cases of at least one major complication or readmission (18.8%). The ensemble AutoPrognosis model had superior risk prediction (AUROC: 0.679 + 0.011) compared to LR (0.651 + 0.014). Furthermore, this model outperformed the four benchmark ML algorithms. The variables most important for AutoPrognosis include history of malignancy, number of comorbidities, and hospital volume. Five of the 10 most important features for AutoPrognosis were markedly less important for LR: teaching hospital status, implant complications, pneumonia, stroke and chronic kidney disease. <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> We report the use of a novel ensemble ML algorithm for prediction of major perioperative complications after posterior cervical fusion. Our novel AutoPrognosis algorithm is well-calibrated and outperforms LR and four standard ML algorithms. By automating the choice of appropriate model as well as tuning of model hyperparameters, AutoPrognosis can be used by clinicians who may not possess an in-depth knowledge of ML methods – facilitating the use of advanced ML methods in mainstream clinical research. Notably, the predictors most important for AutoPrognosis are different from those for LR. This suggests that the superior discriminative capability of AutoPrognosis results from not just its ability to select among different ML models but also by capturing complex non-linear relationships between variables that logistic regression is unable to capture. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Fusion Rates with Autologous Bone Grafts in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Posterior Cervical Spine Fusion

Fusion Rates with Autologous Bone Grafts in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Posterior Cervical Spine Fusion

Lateral mass intra-pedicular screw fixation for subaxial cervical spines - An alternative surgical technique.

Background:Lateral mass screw (LMS) and transpedicular screw (TPS) techniques are the two major options for performing posterior cervical fusion of the subaxial cervical spine. Although these two techniques can cover the vast majority of patients who require posterior fixation of the cervical spine, they are not without their limitations.Objective:The objective of this study is to introduce a novel technique, lateral mass intrapedicular screw (LMIS) fixation, for posterior subaxial cervical spine (C3–C6) fixation.Materials and Methods:The starting point of the screw is defined as the midpoint of the lateral mass. In the axial plane, the screw is angled at 20–25 with respect to the midline of the spinous process. In the sagittal plane, the screw is directed toward the rostral quarter (zone 1) of the vertebral body and placed within the pedicle. A preliminary, proof-of-concept experiment was performed using a bone model created with synthetic bone and computed tomography images before performing the operation on a patient.Results:During the preliminary experiment, insignificant breaching of the inner cortex of the pedicle was observed with one of the screws. However, no other screws breached the inner cortex in the same manner during the preliminary experiment or during the operation, and the intraoperative fixation was strong.Conclusion:LMIS is a relatively simple and safe technique that can be performed for the fixation of subaxial cervical spines with screws that are longer than those used in LMS. We believe that this technique may join the two existing techniques to become a common alternative technique, particularly for patients with poor bone quality.

Does Prophylactic Administration of Tranexamic Acid Reduce Mean Operative Time and Perioperative Blood Loss in Posterior Cervical Spinal Fusion

Does Prophylactic Administration of Tranexamic Acid Reduce Mean Operative Time and Perioperative Blood Loss in Posterior Cervical Spinal Fusion

The C2 Cortical Screw, an Alternative Fixation Technique for the C2 Segment During High Cervical Spine Surgery: Technical Note

For posterior fixation of C2 vertebra (the axis), several fixation techniques such as pedicle screw, laminar screw, and pars screw have been reported. A pedicle screw (PS) is considered the strongest among the techniques, but certain situations make PS fixation impossible or difficult. These include patients with a narrow C2 pedicle or high-riding vertebral artery. We introduced an alternative screw technique for C2 that addressed the aforementioned problems with safely placing it, which we termed a cortical screw (CS) for C2. Among a total of 28 cases using C2 CS for high cervical spine surgery, 2 cases using C2 CS were described. One patient was a 76-year old woman with a gait disturbance and myelopathic symptoms and diagnosed with C1-C2 myelopathy and translational instability. The other case was 54-year old man with posterior neck pain after traffic accident and diagnosed with C1-C2 fracture-dislocation. We used the C2 CS as an alternative technique for high cervical spine surgery in these patients and describe the ideal entry point and trajectory. A postoperative computed tomography scan confirmed proper positioning of the C1 posterior arch screw and C2 CS, with satisfactory reduction of the C2 dens and adequate restoration of the C1-C2 spinal canal. The patient experienced no screw-related postoperative complications, and postoperative 1-year computed tomography images showed that solid union and good alignment of C1-2 segment was achieved. C2 CS can be suitable alternative for C2 screw fixation technique in posterior high cervical spine fusion surgery.