Objective: To investigate the risk factors, clinical manifestations, and treatment of visual loss caused by cosmetic fillers injection. Methods: It was a retrospetive case series study. Collect the clinical data of 18 cases (18 eyes) which were diagnosed as visual loss caused by facial cosmetic fillers injection in the Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University during December, 2014 to June, 2016. Summarize the general condition, medical history, clinical examination results (including visual acuity, intraocular pressure, fundus condition, etc.) and the patient's facial appearance at the time of admission. Take the examinations such as VEP, FFA, OCT, etc. Confirm the composition of the fillers according to the medical history and the product packaging. After the diagnosis, all patients were treated generally combined with intraocular pressure reduction treatment and other treatment measures. Results: All the patients were female, 24-45 years old, with average age of 33.4. The fillers were mainly consisted of hyaluronic acid or autologous fat. For 6 patients the fillers were injected in the forehead, 8 patients were in the nose, the other 4 patients were in both sites. The mean time was 31.7 hours since the onset to the acceptance of medical treatment. All the patients manifested as no light perception, injection site ischemia, different degree of ptosis and fundus examination showed artery occlusion signs. Seventeen patients were central retinal artery occlusion, one was posterior ciliary artery occlusion. After active treatment, 2 patients' visual acuity improved to light perception, one improved to hand movements, while the others had no significant improvement. Conclusions: Most patients who suffered visual loss after cosmetic injections are young or middle-aged women, with most common injection sites at nose or forehead. The visual loss is mainly caused by central retinal artery occlusion which leads to an ineffective clinical treatment. The main factors that may induce artery occlusion are: injection done by informal medical organization, use of non-standard drugs, inadequate understanding of facial anatomy of the operator, and improper injection methods.(Chin J Ophthalmol, 2017, 53: 594-598).
Read full abstract