Posterior Approach Group Research Articles

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Supercapsular Percutaneously Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Standard Posterior Approach for Femoral Neck Fracture in Elderly Patients.

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty (SuperPATH) and the standard posterior approach in hip arthroplasty in treating femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. A systematic search was conducted for studies from 2012 to December 2022. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 on surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, Harris hip scores, and visual analog scale scores. A total of 26 studies involving 2,236 patients with femoral neck fractures were included. The SuperPATH group performed better than traditional posterior approach group in reducing intraoperative blood loss (in ml), shortening incision length (in cm), length of hospitalization period (in days) and improving Harris Hip score (HHS). The operation time took longer than the traditional posterior approach, with statistically significant differences. The VAS scores at 1 week and 3 months after surgery in the SuperPATH group were lower than those of the traditional posterior approach, with statistically significant differences. There was no statistical significance between the two groups in VAS scores 2 weeks and 1 month after surgery. The SuperPATH group resulted in better effects in reducing intraoperative blood loss (in ml), shortening incision length (in cm), length of hospitalization period (in days), and improving Harris hip score (HHS), which is conducive to the rapid postoperative recovery of patients.

Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty With Either the Direct Anterior or Posterior Approaches: A Propensity Score Match Study

BackgroundBilateral hip osteoarthritis is evident in approximately 20% of patients who present to the clinic for evaluation of hip pain, and for those undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), 22% will end up needing a contralateral THA. The risk and benefits of simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (SBTHA) versus staged bilateral THA procedures have been well studied, demonstrating equivalent safety profiles comparable to unilateral and SBTHA. However, the influence of the surgical approach on SBTHA on postoperative outcomes remains unclear. We sought to compare perioperative outcomes and complication rates between the direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterior approach (PA) in patients undergoing SBTHA. MethodsWe performed a 1:1 propensity score match based on age, sex, and body mass index. A total of 252 patients were available after matching, 126 patients in the DAA group and 126 in the PA group. Perioperative outcomes as well as surgical complications at the latest follow-up were retrospectively collected for each group. The mean follow-up was 36.7 months (range, 12.5 to 74.4). ResultsA SBTHA with DAA had significantly shorter surgical time (P < 0.001), anesthesia time (P < 0.001), and length of stay (P < 0.001), compared to the PA. A greater percentage of patients in the DAA group (91%) were discharged home compared to the PA group (57%) (P < 0.001). There were no differences in in-hospital complications (P = 0.617), 90-day complications (P = 0.605), or reoperation rates (P = 0.309) between surgical approaches. ConclusionsA SBTHA, either through the DAA or PA, can be safely performed with low complication rates. The DAA in the setting of SBTHA provides shorter surgical times, a shorter length of stay, and a greater percentage of patients discharged home.

Preliminary comparative study of spinal robot-assisted pedicle screw placement using different surgical approaches

To compare the effectiveness of spinal robot-assisted pedicle screw placement through different surgical approaches and to guide the clinical selection of appropriate robot-assisted surgical approaches. The clinical data of 14 patients with thoracolumbar vertebral diseases who met the selection criteria between January 2023 and August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, and all of them underwent pedicle screw placement under assistant of the Mazor X spinal surgery robot through different surgical approaches. The patients were divided into posterior median approach (PMA) group ( n=6) and intermuscular approach (IMA) group ( n=8) according to the surgical approaches, and there was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index, disease type, and fixed segment between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, screw-related complications, and reoperation rate were recorded and compared between the two groups; the inclination angle of the screw, the distance between the screw and the midline, and the caudal inclination angle of the screw were measured based on X-ray films at immediate after operation. There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups ( P>0.05). There was no screw-related complication such as nerve injury in both groups, and no patients underwent secondary surgery. At immediate after operation, the inclination angle of the screw, the distance between the screw and the midline, and the caudal inclination angle of the screw in the IMA group were significantly greater than those in the PMA group ( P<0.05). There are differences in the position and inclination angle of screws placed with robot-assisted surgery through different surgical approaches, which may be due to the obstruction of the screw path by soft tissues such as skin and muscles. When using spinal robot-assisted surgery, selecting the appropriate surgical approach for different diseases can make the treatment more reasonable and effective.

Spinal Accessory to Suprascapular Nerve Transfer in Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury: A Comparative Study of Shoulder Recovery Outcomes in the Anterior versus Posterior Approach and Surgeons' Preference

Problem statementConventionally, neural transfer of SAN to SSN for shoulder abduction in traumatic brachial plexus injury is done via the anterior approach. But important advantages of the posterior approach like the proximity of neural coaptation to the muscle to be reinnervated and negating the effects of a second injury to the suprascapular nerve have made it an alternative option. MethodologyRetrospective data was collected for a total of 30 SAN to SSN transfer patients of brachial plexus injury in two groups of 15 patients each of anterior (Group A) and posterior approach (Group B) over four years. Functional outcome at the shoulder was measured as muscle power and active range of motion (ROM) at 18 months and data on patients’ satisfaction levels and surgeons’ perceptions were also collected. ResultsNo statistical difference was found in the muscle strength achieved in the two groups (p-value = 0.34) but significant recovery was found in the external rotation achieved by group B (p-value = 0.02). Statistical difference was insignificant in the two groups' active ROM during abduction and external rotation. The satisfaction index of patients was 86.7% in the posterior approach compared to 68% in group A. Surgeons’ perspective showed a faster speed of suprascapular nerve exploration as perceived in the posterior approach with better visibility of supraspinatus muscle contraction, and overall surgeons’ preference for a posterior approach. ConclusionExternal rotation at the shoulder is better with the posterior approach but no difference in abduction. Patients with the posterior approach were more satisfied with the recovery, and surgeons preferred the posterior approach.

Rapid Return to Braking After Anterior and Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Little is known about the effect of surgical approach on return to braking after total hip arthroplasty (THA), and few studies have investigated braking after THA with modern surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols. In a prospective comparative design, we enrolled 65 patients who received right-sided primary THA at our institution from April 2018 through March 2020, 34 with a direct anterior approach (DAA) and 31 with a posterior approach (PA). Braking tests measuring brake reaction time (BRT) and brake pedal depression (BPD) were administered to patients preoperatively and at 1, 2, and 4 weeks postoperatively using a realistic driving simulator. BRT and BPD were compared between groups and preoperatively versus postoperatively using mixed-effects models. Preoperative BRT averaged 638 msec in the DAA group and 604 msec in the PA group (P = 0.31). At 1 week postoperatively, the DAA group had significantly prolonged BRT compared with preoperatively (694 msec, P = 0.02). No significant difference was observed in the PA group (633 msec, P = 0.31). Both groups had returned to baseline by 2 weeks, and both had significantly faster BRT at 4 weeks compared with preoperatively (583 msec for DAA, P = 0.01; 537 msec for PA, P < 0.001). BPD was similar between groups, and there were no significant differences between preoperative and postoperative BPD at any time point. With modern surgical techniques, BRT after right-sided THA returns to baseline levels approximately 2 weeks after surgery. There seems to be a quicker return to preoperative BRT observed in patients with a PA.

Improved patient reported outcomes with the direct anterior approach versus the posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty in the early post-operative period.

Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the direct anterior approach (DAA) may experience faster recovery but may also have better baseline health than those who undergo THA with the posterior approach (PA). This study aimed to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between the DAA and PA while controlling for baseline factors. This is a secondary data analysis from a prospective cohort study of patients utilizing a smartphone-based care management platform following THA. The primary outcomes were HOOS JR and EQ-5D-5L through 1 year and change from baseline. Longitudinal regression models were created to control for baseline characteristics and investigate the impact of surgical approach on PROMs. Of 1364 THAs evaluated, 731 (53.6%) were female, and 840 (61.6%) used the PA. Patients in the PA group were of similar age but had higher body mass index and comorbidity scores. Pre-operative HOOS JR and EQ-5D-5L were comparable, but higher post-operatively in the DAA group through 6months (p = 0.03 and p = 0.005). At 1 year post-operatively, HOOS JR and EQ-5D-5L did not vary between groups (p = 0.48 and p = 0.56), nor did changes from baseline (p = 0.47 and p = 0.11). After controlling baseline characteristics, DAA was significantly associated with higher average HOOS JR through 6months (p = 0.03) and EQ-5D-5L through 3months (p = 0.005), but not at 12months (p = 0.89 and p = 0.56). THA patients undergoing DAA demonstrate earlier improvements in HOOS JR and EQ-5D-5L. However, these differences may not be clinically significant and are not evident at 1-year post-operative. Patient selection and surgeon training may continue to affect outcomes by surgical approach.

Motion acquisition of gait characteristics one week after total hip arthroplasty: a factor analysis

IntroductionClinical gait analysis can be used to evaluate the recovery process of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). The postoperative walking patterns of these patients can be significantly influenced by the choice of surgical approach, as each procedure alters distinct anatomical structures. The aim of this study is twofold. The first objective is to develop a gait model to describe the change in ambulation one week after THA. The secondary goal is to describe the differences associated with the surgical approach.Materials and methodsThirty-six patients undergoing THA with lateral (n = 9), anterior (n = 15), and posterior (n = 12) approaches were included in the study. Walking before and 7 days after surgery was recorded using a markerless motion capture system. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), a data reduction technique, condensed 21 spatiotemporal gait parameters to a smaller set of dominant variables. The EFA-derived gait domains were utilized to study post-surgical gait variations and to compare the post-surgical gait among the three groups.ResultsFour distinct gait domains were identified. The most pronounced variation one week after surgery is in the Rhythm (gait cycle time: +32.9%\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$+32.9\\mathrm{\\%}$$\\end{document}), followed by Postural control (step width: +27.0%\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$+27.0\\mathrm{\\%}$$\\end{document}), Phases (stance time: +11.0%\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$+11.0\\%$$\\end{document}), and Pace (stride length: − 9.3%\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$9.3\\%$$\\end{document}). In postsurgical walking, Phases is statistically significantly different in patients operated with the posterior approach compared to lateral (p-value = 0.017) and anterior (p-value = 0.002) approaches. Furthermore, stance time in the posterior approach group is significantly lower than in healthy individuals (p-value < 0.001).ConclusionsThis study identified a four-component gait model specific to THA patients. The results showed that patients after THA have longer stride time but shorter stride length, wider base of support, and longer stance time, although the posterior group had a statistically significant shorter stance time than the others. The findings of this research have the potential to simplify the reporting of gait outcomes, reduce redundancy, and inform targeted interventions in regards to specific gait domains.

Functional outcome of direct anterior versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a propensity-matched Asian study.

The direct anterior approach (DAA) to total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a surgical approach that minimises soft tissue trauma, resulting in faster rehabilitation when compared to a posterior approach (PA). This study aimed to evaluate the difference between the two groups in an Asian cohort using propensity score matching. A retrospective review of prospectively collected registry data of 794 primary THAs was performed. The effects on patients with DAA THA versus patients with PA THA were investigated. Propensity scores were generated using logistic regression to adjust for confounding variables of age, gender, body mass index and diagnosis. Data analysis was performed, and statistical significance was defined as a P value < 0.05. The average length of stay (LOS) for the PA group and DAA group was 5.4 days and 2.9 days, respectively (P < 0.001). One (1.9%) patient from the PA group suffered a posterior dislocation 6 months after surgery and subsequently underwent revision surgery 2 years later. No dislocations were detected in the DAA group. The DAA group had better functional outcome, satisfaction and expectation scores at 6 months and 2 years. In this study, patients who underwent DAA THA had better functional outcome at 2 years and almost 2 days shorter overall LOS than those who underwent PA THA. Therefore, the DAA to THA is a novel technique that has shown improved functional outcomes, with fewer complications compared to PA THA.

Comparison of Posterior Approach and Combined Anterior-Posterior Approach in the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis Combined With Cervical Spine Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Systematic review. To compare the efficacy of the posterior approach and combined anterior-posterior approach in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with cervical spine fracture by meta-analysis. The databases PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies on the comparison of the posterior approach group and the combined anterior-posterior approach group in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis combined with cervical spine fracture from database establishment to August 2023. The procedure time, intraoperative blood loss, the rates of neurological improvement, mean change in the postoperative neurological function, complication rates, rates of revised surgery, and mortality were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software provided by Cochrane Library. A total of 11 retrospective cohort studies with a total of 215 patients were included in this study. The posterior approach group had lower intraoperative blood loss than the combined anterior-posterior approach group [Mean difference (MD) = -146.05, 95%CI(-187.40,-104.69), P < .00001]; the operation time was significantly less in the posterior approach group than in the combined anterior-posterior approach group [MD = -95.34, 95%CI(-113.13,-77.55), P < .00001]. There were no statistically significant differences in the neurological improvement rates, mean changes in postoperative neurological function, complication rates, modified surgery rates, and mortality rates. Both the posterior approach and combined anterior and posterior approach can achieve good results. Clinicians should develop an individualized approach based on the patient's fracture type, degree of spinal cord injury, fracture stability, fracture dislocation, general condition, and underlying disease.

Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block: Posterior versus anterior approach in paediatrics undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Regional anaesthesia has gained popularity in managing post-operative pain in paediatric patients. Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is recognised as one of the peri-operative pain management techniques used during abdominal surgeries. However, no consensus about the best approach has been reached. Sixty paediatric patients with ages ranging from 1 to 6 as well as classification I and II of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, scheduled for laparoscopic inguinal hernia, were allocated to receive either a posterior approach (Group I) or an anterior approach (Group II) QLB. Twenty four-hour morphine consumption, the face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) score, duration of analgesia, performance time, and block-related complications were recorded. Group II showed significantly lower morphine consumption as well as a longer duration of analgesia (P = 0.039*, 0.020*, respectively), with an equivalent period for block performance being reported in the two groups (P = 0.080). At 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours post-operatively, the FLACC scores were substantially diminished in Group II compared to Group I (P = 0.001*, 0.012*, 0.002*, 0.028*, respectively). However, at twenty-four hours, comparable pain scores were observed between both groups (P = 0.626). In addition, there were no block-related complications. In paediatric patients scheduled for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, the ultra-sound-guided anterior approach of the QLB was associated with significantly reduced post-operative morphine consumption, a lower FLACC score, and a longer analgesia duration when compared to the posterior approach.

Ease of Internal Jugular Venous Cannulation by Anterior V/S Posterior Approach: A Randomized Interventional Study

Background: Percutaneous cervical central venous cannulation is now common practice during Perioperative care in major surgical procedures, critically ill patients in intensive care units for long term hyperalimentation and for rapid restoration of blood volume in cases of acute blood loss. Proper route of insertion is essential for its success. The objective of this study is to compare procedural parameters and complications associated with anterior and posterior approaches for Internal Jugular Venous cannulation.&#x0D; Methods: Our study was conducted as a prospective randomized interventional trail in 60 patients undergoing scheduled cardiac surgeries requiring Right internal jugular venous cannulation in a tertiary level hospital after obtaining clearance from ethics committee, patients were randomly allocated into two groups either Anterior approach (Group A; n=30) or Posterior Approach (Group B; n=30). Number of attempts, time for identification of IJV, duration of cannulation, ease of insertion, complications were compared in both the groups.&#x0D; Results: The number of attempts (p value 0.036), mean time taken for vein identification (p value 0.0003), catheterization time (p value &lt;0.001), incidence of arterial puncture and hematoma are less with posterior approach, ease of threading is comparable among both the group. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences with respect to the Age, Sex, ASA grade.&#x0D; Conclusion: The posterior approach is better than anterior approach for Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation, as it improves the success rate, permits easy threading of catheter, reduces access time and duration of cannulation, complications like arterial puncture, hematoma, pneumothorax are lesser in posterior approach.

Treatment of Distal Third Humeral Shaft Fracture with Intramedullary Nail Combined with Anterior Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis.

The treatment of distal third humeral shaft fracture is difficult. Studies have shown that anterior minimally invasive plate has lower probability of complication and higher healing rate. However there is no applicable anatomical plate at present. This study is to investigate the clinical effect of intramedullary nail combined with anterior minimally invasive plate in the treatment of distal humeral shaft fractures. The data of 83 patients with lower humerus shaft fracture treated from September 2015 to January 2020 were analyzed. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into two groups: 40 patients were treated with intramedullary nailing combined with minimally invasive anterior plate fixation (group A), and 43 patients were treated with double plate fixation through posterior approach (group B). General preoperative data, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, total incision length, fracture healing time, shoulder and elbow visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Constant-Murley shoulder function score, Mayo elbow function score, and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. Two independent sample t-tests was used for follow-up, age, BMI, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, total incision length, fracture healing time, Constant-Murley score and Mayo score, and rank sum test was used for VAS score of shoulder and elbow. There was no significant difference in preoperative general data between the two groups (p > 0.05), indicating comparability. There were no significant differences in operation time, total incision length, fracture healing time, Constant-Murley shoulder function score at the last follow-up, Mayo elbow function score, and shoulder and elbow VAS pain score between 2 groups (p > 0.05). The amount of intraoperative blood loss in observation group was 76.98 ± 16.46, which was significantly less than that in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). There were no radial nerve injury, musculocutaneous nerve injury, incision infection and fracture nonunion in the observation group. In the control group, four cases of iatrogenic radial nerve injury, three cases of incision infection and three cases of fracture nonunion were found. The complication rate was 23.3% (10/43). There was statistical difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (p < 0.01). A humeral intramedullary nail combined with an anterior minimally invasive plate in the treatment of distal humeral shaft fracture has the advantages of less soft tissue damage, less blood transfusion, high fracture healing rate and low risk of iatrogenic radial nerve injury, which is an effective method for clinical treatment of this type of fracture.

Posterior Calot's Triangle Approach First Would Be a Better Choice for Chronic Atrophic Cholecystitis: A Retrospective Controlled Study.

Objective: Compare the clinical efficacy of anterior and posterior Calot's triangle approach in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for chronic atrophic cholecystitis, to find out which approach is much safer and more reliable. Patients and Methods: From June 2020 to June 2022, 102 patients with chronic atrophic cholecystitis underwent LC in our hospital. They were divided into anterior Calot's triangle approach group and posterior Calot's triangle approach group. In addition, their clinical data, intraoperative conditions, surgical results, and postoperative recovery were analyzed. Results: LC was performed in 41 females and 28 males by the anterior Calot's triangle approach, and in 20 females and 13 males by the posterior Calot's triangle approach. There were no differences in age, gender, and body mass index between the two groups (P > .05). The probability of rupture of cystic artery between both groups was not significantly different (P = .549), and the intraoperative blood loss was more in the anterior group (P = .014). The operative time of the posterior approach appeared to be shorter (P = .013). Bile duct injury and conversion to open cholecystectomy revealed no significant difference (P > .05). The recovery time of gastrointestinal function, wound infection, white blood cell count, liver function, and postoperative hospital stay time were found to be not significantly different (P > .05). Conclusion: By the posterior Calot's triangle approach, LC is a convenient and feasible surgical procedure for chronic atrophic cholecystitis with less blood loss and can become easier without increasing the risk of surgery.

Computed Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Stylomastoid Foramen Puncture and Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation for Treatment of Hemifacial Spasm via Mandibular Angle Approach

BACKGROUND: Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is characterized by progressive, paroxysmal, and involuntary convulsions on one side of the face. We have conducted in-depth exploration on the puncture approach through the mandibular angle, which is an important supplement to the first 2 approaches (i.e., premastoid approach and the postmastoid approach), especially for patients who cannot find a suitable way before and after the mastoid process. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous mandibular angle radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) of facial nerve through the stylomastoid foramen in treating HFS. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, observational study. SETTING: Pain Department, Jiaxing and Hangzhou, China. METHODS: A total of 89 patients with HFS who underwent CT-guided RFT in the Pain Department of Zhejiang Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital and the Pain Department of Jiaxing First Hospital, from June 2020 to June 2022, were retrospectively analyzed, including 29 men and 60 women, aged 34~88 (59.8 ± 11.1). They were divided into 3 groups: anterior mastoid approach group (Group A, n = 38), posterior mastoid approach group (Group P, n = 26), and mandibular angle approach group (Group M, n = 25), according to the different puncture approaches. Puncture time, minimum stimulating current triggering facial muscle twitches, temperature at the end of RFT and duration time of RFT at this temperature, and total treatment time, as well as degree of facial paralysis and complications one-day postoperation, were compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS: The puncture times (mean ± SD) of Group A, Group P, and Group M were (30.63 ± 4.88), (31.35 ± 5.89), and (35.08 ± 5.76), respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (P = 0.006). The puncture time of Group M was longer than that of Groups A and P (P &lt; 0.05). The minimum stimulating current triggering facial muscle twitches in the 3 groups were (0.49 ± 0.16), (0.43 ± 0.14), and (0.28 ± 0.09), respectively, with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.000). The minimum stimulation current in Group M was less than that in Groups A and P (P &lt; 0.05). The temperature at the end of RFT of the 3 groups was (78.29 ± 7.91), (76.54 ± 8.10), and (66.60 ± 8.00), respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (P &lt; 0.001). The temperature of Group M was lower than Groups A and P (P &lt; 0.05). There were no significant differences among the 3 groups in the total operation time or the degree of facial paralysis one-day postoperation (P &gt; 0.05). No hematoma, infection, hearing impairment, or other complications were reported in any patients. LIMITATIONS: The nonrandomized nature, small sample size, and retrospective design are limitations of this study. CONCLUSIONS: CT-guided RFT through the stylomastoid foramen is an effective treatment of HFS. Compared to the poster and anterior mastoid approaches, the mandibular angle approach was found to be more effective in terms of reduced minimum stimulating current and reduced-end RFT temperature, which means fewer potential complications to the patient postsurgery. KEY WORDS: Hemifacial spasm, radiofrequency thermocoagulation, stylomastoid foramen, CT-guided

Comparative Study between Anterior and Posterior Approaches in Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Background The best surgical approach for management of degenerative cervical myelopathy remains area of debate between spinal surgeons. The purpose of this study compare between anterior approach (anterior cervical discectomy with fusion) and posterior approach (laminectomy with and without fusion) for treatment of multilevel spondylotic myelopathy according to clinical, radiological outcomes, recovery rates and complications. Material and Methods A total of 20 patients were operated by anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and 20 patients were operated by cervical laminectomy with and without fusion in this study. Preoperative and postoperative clinical assessment were done using modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score and Myelopathy scale (MS). Postoperative complications, recovery rate and intraoperative blood loss are recorded. Preoperative and postoperative radiological analysis were done using Cobb angle measurement (C2-7 angle) and canal diameter assessment by measuring the canal through the center of each vertebra and intervertebral discs (C2–C7) on 10 transverse planes on mid-sagittal T2WI image. Results There was significant decrease in pre-operative mJOA scale in posterior approach group; compared to anterior group (P = 0.41). There was highly significant decrease in duration of symptoms in anterior approach group; compared to anterior group (P &amp;lt; 0.01) and significant decrease in pre-operative MS scale in anterior approach group; compared to anterior group (P &amp;lt; 0.05). There is non-significant difference as regards post-operative mJOA scale and MS scale between anterior and posterior group (p &amp;gt; 0.05). Although recovery rate was higher in anterior group than posterior group (49.5 ± 27.2 vs 39.51 ± 11.30), but finally There was no significant difference as regards postoperative recovery, improvement and complications rates (p &amp;gt; 0.05). postoperative canal diameter change was greater in posterior surgery than anterior group (11.1 ± 1.98 vs 9.5 ± 0.76). Reoperation rate was higher in anterior group. Postoperative C5 palsy and axial neck pain were higher in posterior group. Conclusions Both anterior and posterior approaches were successful to treat multilevel CSM, but no definitive surgical approach was proved for management of CSM and each case should be evaluated carefully for determination of best surgical approach according to preoperative Cobb angle and canal diameter.

Joint awareness among total hip arthroplasty patients operated through anterior approach versus posterior approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare joint awareness in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the anterior approach (AA) versus the posterior approach (PA). The hypothesis was that patients who underwent THA via AA would have better forgetfulness of the artificial joint. A comprehensive search of major literature databases and bibliographic details was conducted to identify studies evaluating the forgotten joint score (FJS-12) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients operated through the anterior approach (AA) and posterior approach (PA). Out of 234 studies identified, seven studies met the inclusion criteria for review. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and the risk of bias in the included studies. The FJS-12 was evaluated at three months, one year, and beyond 2 years. The mean FJS-12 at > 2years was 82.03 in the AA group and 80.32 in the PA group. The forest plot analysis (n = 819 patients) revealed no significant difference in FJS-12 score between these two approaches (MD 2.13, 95% CI [- 1.17, 5.42], p = 0.21; I2 = 60%). However, the joint awareness was significantly lesser in the AA group at 3months (MD 12.56, 95% CI [9.58, 15.54], p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%) and 1year (MD 9.55, 95% CI [7.85, 11.24], p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%). After analyzing the available literature, it was found that THA patients operated through the AA approach have significantly lower joint awareness than those operated through the PA approach in the first year of surgery. However, there is no significant difference in joint awareness between these two approaches after 2years. III.

Does robot-assisted surgery reduce leg length discrepancy in total hip replacement? Robot-assisted posterior approach versus direct anterior approach and manual posterior approach: a propensity score-matching study

BackgroundAdvocates of robot-assisted technique argue that robots could improve leg length restoration in total hip replacement. However, there were few studies to compare the robot-assisted posterior approach (RPA) with conventional posterior approach (PA) THA and direct anterior approach (DAA) THA in LLD. This study aimed to determine whether robot-assisted techniques could significantly reduce LLD compared to manual DAA and manual PA.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the cohort of consecutive ONFH patients who underwent THA robot-assisted posterior, manual posterior, and manual DAA from January 2018 to December 2020 in one institution. One experienced surgeon performed all procedures. We calculated the propensity score to match similar patients in different groups by multivariate logistic regression analysis for each patient. We included confounders consisting of age at the time of surgery, sex, body mass index (BMI), and preoperative LLD. Postoperative LLD and Harris hip scores (HHS) at two years after surgery of different cohorts were compared.ResultWe analyzed 267 ONFH patients treated with RPA, DAA, or PA (73 RPA patients, 99 DAA patients, and 95 PA patients). After propensity score matching, we generated cohorts of 40 patients in DAA and RPA groups. And we found no significant difference in postoperative LLD between RPA and DAA cohorts (4.10 ± 3.50 mm vs 4.60 ± 4.14 mm, p = 0.577) in this study. The HHS at 2 years postoperatively were 87.04 ± 7.06 vs 85.33 ± 8.34 p = 0.202. After propensity score matching, we generated cohorts of 58 patients in manual PA and RPA groups. And there were significant differences in postoperative LLD between the RPA and PA cohorts. (3.98 ± 3.27 mm vs 5.38 ± 3.68 mm, p = 0.031). The HHS at 2 years postoperatively were 89.38 ± 6.81 vs 85.33 ± 8.81 p = 0.019. After propensity score matching, we generated cohorts of 75 patients in manual DAA and PA groups. And there were significant differences in postoperative LLD between the DAA and PA cohorts. (4.03 ± 3.93 mm vs 5.39 ± 3.83 mm, p = 0.031) The HHS at 2 years postoperatively were 89.71 ± 6.18 vs 86.91 ± 7.20 p = 0.012.ConclusionThis study found no significant difference in postoperative LLD between RPA and DAA, but we found a significant difference between RPA and manual PA, DAA and manual PA in ONFH patients. We found a significant advantage in leg length restoration in primary total hip arthroplasty with robot-assisted surgery.

Comparison of anterior and posterior approaches in Treating odontoid fractures: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Odontoid fractures account for 15%-20% of cervical injuries. Although the operation methods vary in different types, the superiority of overall outcomes of the anterior approach (AA) and posterior approach (PA) in treating odontoid fractures still remains controversial. Thus, a meta-analysis was performed comparing AA and PA for these fractures. The relevant studies were searched in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China Biological Medicine (CBM), and Wanfang Database from the onset of conception to June 2022. Prospective or retrospective comparative studies on AA and PA for odontoid fractures were screened, referring to fusion rates (primary outcomes), complications, and postoperative mortality rates. A meta-analysis of the primary outcomes and a systematic review of other outcomes were performed; the procedure was conducted with Review Manager 5.3. Twelve articles comrising 452 patients were included, and all publications were retrospective cohort studies. The average postoperative fusion rate was 77.5 ± 17.9% and 91.4 ± 13.5% in AA and PA, respectively, with statistical significance [OR = 0.42 (0.22, 0.80), P = 0.009]. Subgroup analysis showed a difference in fusion rates between AA and PA in the elderly group [OR = 0.16 (0.05, 0.49), P = 0.001]. Five articles referred to postoperative mortality, and the mortality rates of AA (5.0%) and PA (2.3%) showed no statistical difference (P = 0.148). Nine studies referred to complications, with a rate of 9.7%. The incidence of complications in AA and PA groups was comparable (P = 0.338), and the incidence of nonfusion and complications was irrelevant. The prevalent cause of death was myocardial infarction. The time and segmental movement retention of AA were possibly superior to those of PA. AA may be superior in regard to operation time and motion retention. There was no difference in complications and mortality rates between the two approaches. The posterior approach would be preferred in consideration of the fusion rate.

Surgical outcome of locked facet in distractive flexion injury of the subaxial cervical spine: Single institution retrospective study.

The optimal surgical treatment for patients suffering from distractive flexion injury of the subaxial cervical spine with a locked facet (LF) is unknown. Closed reduction via an anterior or posterior approach is a treatment option for LF. We examined the surgical outcomes of patients treated for locked facet distractive flexion injury (LF-DFI) in this case series, with a particular emphasis on the surgical approach and reduction maneuver. We retrospectively analyzed the patients with distractive flexion injury of the subaxial cervical spine who underwent surgery at our hospital between November 2006 and April 2021. Patients who did not have facet subluxation or dislocation or those who achieved LF reduction prior to skin incision were excluded from this study. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on their initial approach, anterior or posterior approach. Perioperative clinical outcomes, including the American Spinal Cord Injury Association scale score, radiological changes, and complications were analyzed. This study enrolled 12 patients with LF-DFI. Four and 8 patients underwent the anterior and posterior approaches, respectively. The LF was reduced using an anterior approach with traction between the vertebral bodies in the anterior approach group and using a posterior approach with partial facetectomy in the posterior approach group. The preoperative American Spinal Cord Injury Association scale scores were as follows: A, 1 patient; B, 1 patient; C, 3 patients; D, 4 patients; and E, 3 patients. Nine patients showed no neurologic deterioration after surgery, whereas 2 had an aggravated neurologic status. Postoperatively, patients who underwent posterior open reduction did not exhibit worsened neurologic symptoms, whereas 2 patients who underwent the anterior approach showed worsened neurologic symptoms. At the final follow-up, all patients achieved radiological fusion, and no complications other than neurologic deterioration were identified. In terms of worsening postoperative neurologic status, a posterior approach using partial facetectomy for LF reduction is considered a safer surgical technique than an anterior approach. To avoid iatrogenic intraoperative cord injury, we recommend posterior approach in patients with LF-DFI.

Comparison of Posterior and Anterolateral Surgical Approaches in Treating Adult Humeral Shaft Fractures.

The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes and complications of two different surgical approaches, the anterolateral and posterior approaches, for treating humeral shaft fractures. Between January 2015 and May 2021, 51 patients with humeral shaft fractures were treated with anterolateral and posterior approaches. Twenty-nine patients were operated with the posterior approach (group 1) and 22 with the anterolateral approach (group 2). Statistical analyses were performed between the two groups regarding age, gender distribution, fractured side, body mass index (BMI), type of trauma, Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, and follow-up time. Complications such as operative time, amount of bleeding, incision length and implant fracture, radial nerve palsy, wound infection, and nonunion were compared between the two groups. Functional results of the elbow joint were evaluated with the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. The mean follow-up period was 49.10±21.15 months (12-75 months) in group 1 and 50.00±23.71 months (range: 15-70 months) in group 2. There was no statistical difference between the groups in terms of age, gender distribution, fractured side, BMI, trauma type, AO/OTA classification, and follow-up time (p>0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and incision length (p>0.05). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 77.24±20.03 (range: 70-100 points) in group 1 and 81.36±8.34 (range: 70-100 points) in group 2, and no significant difference was found (p>0.05). When evaluated in terms of complications, there was no significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). While there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding elbow joint range of motion, the limitation was observed in more patients in group 1. Similar satisfactory treatment results were obtained in patients who underwent anterolateral and posterior approaches in treating humeral shaft fractures. Furthermore, no difference was found between the two approaches regarding complication rates.