Post-transplant Outcomes In Patients Research Articles

Management and Outcomes of Kidney Transplant Candidates With Severe Pulmonary Hypertension: A Single-center Strategy and Experience.

Severe pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with high mortality posttransplant and thus is considered a contraindication to kidney transplantation. In this study, we describe the pretransplant management and posttransplant outcomes in patients with severe PH using a multidisciplinary approach. Between 11 of 2013 and 8 of 2022, we identified all patients with severe PH on initial pretransplant workup who underwent ultrafiltration (UF) or medical therapy for PH before transplant. Posttransplant we evaluated the perioperative course, renal function, graft, and patient survival. We compared survival to those who remained waitlisted or were delisted. Three-two patients (mean age = 55.03 ± 10.22 y) diagnosed with severe PH on pretransplant screening echocardiogram. Thirty patients (94%) were subjected to a median of 4 (range, 3-8) UF sessions with an average weight loss of 4.33 ± 2.6 kg. Repeat assessment of PH revealed a decline in mean pulmonary artery systolic pressure from 67 ± 12 mm Hg to 43 ± 13 mm Hg (P < 0.0001). Seventeen patients (53%) received a kidney transplant. The mean estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate at 3, 6, 9, and 12 mo was 72 ± 27, 72 ± 28, 75 ± 29, and 75 ± 29 mL/min/1.73 m2. Among, those who underwent transplantation both graft and patient survival was 100% at 1-y posttransplant. Overall, since the UF intervention, at a median follow-up of 88 ± 12 mo those transplanted had a patient survival of 88% while those who remained on dialysis had a survival of 53% (P = 0.0003). In this single-center study, we report postcapillary PH can be a significant contributor to elevations in pulmonary artery systolic pressure. Using a multidisciplinary approach, PH can improve with volume removal and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors therapy leading to a successful posttransplant outcome.

ECMO as a bridge to heart transplantation: Insights into stratification by heart failure etiology

PurposeRevisions to the heart allocation criteria in 2018 motivated an increased use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to transplantation. Studies have demonstrated inferior post-transplant outcomes in patients bridged with ECMO but do not account for underlying diagnosis. Our objective was to elucidate the differential impact of ECMO on outcomes by heart failure (HF) etiology. MethodsThe United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for adults who underwent isolated heart transplantation after October 2018. Patients were stratified by ECMO utilization at time of transplantation, and then by HF etiology. After baseline statistical comparisons, survival analysis relied on Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional models. Results13,203 patients were included, of whom 761 (5.8%) were supported with ECMO. ECMO patients were younger (48 vs. 54 years, p<0.001), less likely to have diabetes (24% vs 30%, p<0.001), smoke cigarettes (31% vs 41%, p<0.001) or have prior cardiac surgery (29% vs. 36%, p<0.001), more likely to require dialysis (20% vs. 5%, p<0.001), and spent fewer days on the waitlist (59 vs. 190, p<0.001). After adjustment, ECMO was associated with increased mortality (HR 1.85, p<0.001) in the full cohort. After incorporating HF etiology, this increased mortality risk persisted in all subgroups except restrictive cardiomyopathy and congenital heart disease (CHD). ConclusionsOur findings illustrate that HF etiology is associated with differing outcomes when bridging with ECMO. ECMO patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy or CHD did not have increased mortality risk. With ECMO utilization increasing, these data are hypothesis-generating and serve as a basis for further studies.

(432) - Impact of Blood Type on Pre- and Post-Transplant Outcomes in Patients with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices Listed for Orthotopic Heart Transplant

(432) - Impact of Blood Type on Pre- and Post-Transplant Outcomes in Patients with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices Listed for Orthotopic Heart Transplant

(427) - Waitlist and Post-Transplant Outcomes of Patients Listed for Heart-Lung Transplantation After Implementation of the 2018 French Heart Allocation System

(427) - Waitlist and Post-Transplant Outcomes of Patients Listed for Heart-Lung Transplantation After Implementation of the 2018 French Heart Allocation System

Association between bridging therapy and posttransplant outcomes in patients with HCC within Milan criteria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liver transplantation is the curative therapy of choice for patients with early-stage HCC. Locoregional therapies are often employed as a bridge to reduce the risk of waitlist dropout; however, their association with posttransplant outcomes is unclear. We conducted a systematic review using Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify studies published between database inception and August 2, 2023, which reported posttransplant recurrence-free survival and overall survival among patients transplanted for HCC within Milan criteria, stratified by receipt of bridging therapy. Pooled HRs were calculated for each outcome using the DerSimonian and Laird method for a random-effects model. We identified 38 studies, including 19,671 patients who received and 20,148 patients who did not receive bridging therapy. Bridging therapy was not associated with significant differences in recurrence-free survival (pooled HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.77-1.08; I2 =39%) or overall survival (pooled HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.95-1.24; I2 =47%). Results were relatively consistent across subgroups, including geographic location and study period. Studies were discordant regarding the differential strength of association by pretreatment tumor burden and pathologic response, but potential benefits of locoregional therapy were mitigated in those who received 3 or more treatments. Adverse events were reported in a minority of studies, but when reported occurred in 6%-15% of the patients. Few studies reported loss to follow-up and most had a risk of residual confounding. Bridging therapy is not associated with improvements in posttransplant recurrence-free or overall survival among patients with HCC within Milan criteria. The risk-benefit ratio of bridging therapy likely differs based on the risk of waitlist dropout.

Impact of Pretransplant Dialysis Modality on Posttransplant Outcomes: A Single-Center Experience.

It remains unclear whether posttransplant outcomes differ according to the pretransplant dialysis modality (peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis). Our aim was to assess posttransplant outcomes in patients with different predialysis modalities. Two thousand two hundred fifty-eight kidney recipients following up in Hamed Alessa Organ transplant center in Kuwait were included and divided into two groups according to pre-transplant dialysis modality: Group 1: those who received hemodialysis (HD) and group 2: those with peritoneal dialysis (PD). Demographics, pretransplant and posttransplant comorbidities, and patient and graft outcomes were studied. There were 1956 patients on hemodialysis, and 302 patients were on peritoneal dialysis. Most were male patients (1456 vs 802 female patients), with comparable mean age (P = .34). Chronic glomerulonephritis and diabetic nephropathy represented the most common original kidney disease before transplant (27.6% and 21.4%, respectively), with higher prevalence of glomerulonephritis in group 1 and diabetic nephropathy in group 2 (P = .001). The 2 groups were comparable with regard to immunosuppression (induction and maintenance) (P > .05). Posttransplant diabetes and hypertension were significantly higher in the hemodialysis group (P = .004 and P = 003, respectively). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to the graft outcome (P = .86). However, patient survival was significantly higher in the hemodialysis group (81.2% vs 64.4%). Compared with peritoneal dialysis, pretransplant hemodialysis is associated with better posttransplant patient survival despite no difference in the graft outcome. Diabetes-related complications could be attributed to such outcomes.

The impact of hepatitis B and C positive serologies on the outcomes of non-hepatic solid organ transplantation in the United States.

Chronic viral hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) infection could negatively affect outcomes of non-hepatic solid organ transplantations due to the risk of viral reactivation in the presence of immunosuppression. This study aimed to determine post-transplant outcomes in patients with HBV or HCV positivity receiving non-hepatic solid-state organ transplant. Data was collected from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) 2006-2021 for patients (≥18) who received a lung, heart, or kidney single organ transplant in the U.S. Hepatitis C positivity (HCV+) was determined as positive HCV Ab and hepatitis B positivity (HBV+) as positive HBsAg. We included N = 30,872 lung, N = 36,990 heart and N = 280,162 kidney transplant recipients. The prevalence of HBV+ was 1.3% in lung, 1.5% in heart and 1.7% in kidney patients, HCV+ was 2.2%, 2.2% and 5.0%, respectively. Post-transplant survival of patients with vs. without HBV+ was similar in all solid organ transplants (all p > .05). Similarly, there was no difference in post-transplant survival between lung transplant recipients with vs. without anti-HCV (all p > .05). Heart transplant recipients with HCV+ had higher crude post-transplant mortality (all p < .01). Similarly, there was higher post-transplant mortality in kidney transplant recipients with HCV+ (1-year: 6% vs. 3%; 5-year: 21% vs. 13%; 10-year: 47% vs. 31%; all p < .0001). In multivariate analysis controlling for confounders, only the association of HCV+ with higher post-kidney transplant mortality remained significant: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) (95% CI) = 1.16 (1.12-1.20), p < .0001. There was no association of viral hepatitis seropositivity with the risk of graft failure in all groups (p > .05). In most cases, the presence of HBV or HCV serologies is not associated with adverse post-transplant outcomes in non-hepatic solid organ transplants. However, kidney transplant recipients who are positive for HCV serology have an increased risk for post-transplant mortality.

Improved assessment of donor liver steatosis using Banff consensus recommendations and deep learning algorithms

The Banff Liver Working Group recently published consensus recommendations for steatosis assessment in donor liver biopsy, but few studies reported their use and no automated deep-learning algorithms based on the proposed criteria have been developed so far. We evaluated Banff recommendations on a large monocentric series of donor liver needle biopsies by comparing pathologists' scores with those generated by convolutional neural networks (CNNs) we specifically developed for automated steatosis assessment. We retrospectively retrieved 292 allograft liver needle biopsies collected between January 2016 and January 2020 and performed steatosis assessment using a former intra-institution method (pre-Banff method) and the newly introduced Banff recommendations. Scores provided by pathologists and CNN models were then compared, and the degree of agreement was measured with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Regarding the pre-Banff method, poor agreement was observed between the pathologist and CNN models for small droplet macrovesicular steatosis (ICC: 0.38), large droplet macrovesicular steatosis (ICC: 0.08), and the final combined score (ICC: 0.16) evaluation, but none of these reached statistically significance. Interestingly, significantly improved agreement was observed using the Banff approach: ICC was 0.93 for the low-power score (p <0.001), 0.89 for the high-power score (p <0.001), and 0.93 for the final score (p <0.001). Comparing the pre-Banff method with the Banff approach on the same biopsy, pathologist and CNN model assessment showed a mean (±SD) percentage of discrepancy of 26.89 (±22.16) and 1.20 (±5.58), respectively. Our findings support the use of Banff recommendations in daily practice and highlight the need for a granular analysis of their effect on liver transplantation outcomes. We developed and validated the first automated deep-learning algorithms for standardized steatosis assessment based on the Banff Liver Working Group consensus recommendations. Our algorithm provides an unbiased automated evaluation of steatosis, which will lay the groundwork for granular analysis of steatosis's short- and long-term effects on organ viability, enabling the identification of clinically relevant steatosis cut-offs for donor organ acceptance. Implementing our algorithm in daily clinical practice will allow for a more efficient and safe allocation of donor organs, improving the post-transplant outcomes of patients.

Development of a Stacked Ensemble Model for Risk Stratification of Chronic Gvhd after Allogeneic HSCT: Trump Cohort Study

Background Effective risk stratification is vital for selecting donors and developing treatment strategies for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Several pretransplant risk models have been proposed to predict post-transplant patient outcomes from pretransplant risk factors. However, it is still challenging to predict mid-to-long-term prognosis. To establish a novel and user-friendly tool for predicting chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS), we used a Stacked Ensemble Model (SEM) designed to handle right-censored data and competing risk events (Iwasaki et al., 2021). Methods Using Japanese registry data, the Japanese Transplant Registry Unified Management Program, we analyzed 21,840 patients who underwent their first allo-HSCT between 2010 and 2018 for hematologic malignancies. Of these, 14,430 patients were alive without cGVHD and relapse on day 100 post-transplantation. Primary endpoint was cGVHD and secondary endpoints were NRM and OS. Data were randomly split into the training set (70% of the dataset) and the validation set (30%). We treated patient age and time from diagnosis to transplant as continuous variables and performance status, ABO type matching, sex matching, disease/status groups based on refined Disease Risk Index, Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index, usage of total body irradiation, conditioning intensity, T cell depletion in vivo, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) locus matching, the number of HLA mismatching and CMV serostatus as categorical variables. To evaluate predictive accuracy at day 30, 60 and 100 posttransplant, we considered acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and its treatment, including grade 2 to 4 aGVHD occurrence, grade 3 to 4 aGVHD occurrence, stage of aGVHD before and after treatment, corticosteroid treatment, anti-thymocyte globulin treatment and treatment response of 1 st line therapy for aGVHD. Results The median age of the patients at transplantation was 51 years (inter quartile range (IQR): 39 - 60). The sources of stem cells were HLA-matched related bone marrow (BM) in 967 patients, HLA-matched related peripheral blood (PB) in 1,998 patients, haploidentical BM in 172 patients, haploidentical PB in 778 patients, unrelated BM in 5,539 patients, unrelated PB in 366 patients, and cord blood in 4,237 patients. Myeloablative conditioning was administered in 9,390 patients and reduced-intensity conditioning in 5,040 patients. The most common indication of HSCT was intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in complete remission (CR, n=3,233) followed by acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first CR (n=2,164) and intermediate-risk AML in non-CR (n=1,618). Median follow-up period of survivors was 2.2 years (IQR: 0.9-4.5). The overall performance of SEM was superior across the endpoints evaluated, cGVHD, NRM and OS, while XGBoost showed a slightly higher C-index for cGVHD, demonstrating its robustness and reliability (Table 1, the C-index for cGVHD/NRM/OS-SEM: 0.567/0.635/0.607, Cox-PH: 0.550/0.624/0.602, Random Survival Forest: 0.555/0.632/0.597, XGBoost: 0.573/0.624/0.604, and Dynamic Deephit: 0.549/0.614/0.589). C-index of SEM for cGVHD, NRM, and OS were gradually improved as time goes by (Table 1, the C-index for cGVHD/NRM/OS: at day 30-0.589/0.643/0.635, at day 60-0.598/0.655/0.640, at day 100-0.598/0.688/0.640). Kaplan-Meier curves 100-day post-transplantation confirmed the accuracy of our predictions, effectively stratifying patients into four risk groups (Figure 1). SHapley Additive Explanations showed contribution of variables for predicting specific outcomes. Grade 3 to 4 aGVHD and stage of aGVHD after treatment influenced non-relapse mortality. Particularly, grade 3 to 4 aGVHD showed significant impact on OS in line with pretransplant risk factors including sex matching, donor source and disease/status groups. Grade 2 to 4 aGVHD and treatment response of 1 st line therapy for aGVHD influenced cGVHD. Conclusion Our study emphasizes the importance of aGVHD events in mid-to-long-term post-transplantation outcomes and presents SEM-based prediction models that account for early-phase post-transplantation events. We are currently developing a user-friendly web application tool for cGVHD, aiming to enhance post-transplant risk stratification and preemptive therapy for cGVHD.

Abstract 16305: Closing the Disparities Gap for Heart Transplant Patients Bridged to Transplant With Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support

Background: There are known disparities in waitlist outcomes by race and sex among patients bridged to heart transplant (BTT) with durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS). With the increasing use of temporary MCS devices (tMCS), we examined waitlist and post-transplant outcomes of patients who had BTT with tMCS. Methods: Data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was used to identify patients BTT with tMCS between 2008 and 2018. Patients were stratified by race and sex. Primary outcomes were waitlist mortality within 1 year of listing and 1 year post-transplant mortality among those who successfully reached transplant. Survival was examined with the Kaplan Meier method and Cox proportional hazard modeling. Results: A total of 997 patients received tMCS as BTT, including 606 white, 203 Black, 119 Hispanic, 56 Asian, 13 other race, and 302 (30%) female patients. Baseline hemodynamics were comparable among groups. Waitlist mortality within 1 year of listing was 35.8% overall and similar for all races (p=0.418) and both sexes (p=0.617). Among those who successfully reached transplant, there were no differences in 1 year post-transplant survival by race (p=0.722) or sex (p= 0.475). On multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling, neither race nor sex was associated with waitlist or post-transplant mortality (p=NS). Level of education (&lt;high school) was independently associated with 1 year waitlist mortality (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.06 - 2.06). History of diabetes (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.07-1.74) and post-transplant dialysis (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.18-2.29) were associated with 1 year post transplant mortality. Conclusions: Unlike in BTT with durable MCS, we did not find differences in outcomes associated with race and sex among patients BTT with tMCS. Given the sharp increase in tMCS use after the 2018 U.S. allocation change, it will be important to closely monitor that access to transplantation and outcomes of BTT with tMCS patients continue to be equitable.

Abstract 12489: Sex Differences in Incidence and Outcomes of Patients With New-Onset Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus After Heart Transplantation

Introduction: Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a common complication following heart transplantation (HT), mostly commonly occurring in the first year after transplant. A few risk factors for the development of PTDM have been identified, including immunosuppressive medications such as calcineurin inhibitors and glucocorticoids. Some studies have suggested that among HT recipients, women have higher rates of acute rejection which may necessitate higher doses of steroids and further hyperglycemia. However, differences between sexes in the incidence of PTDM after HT have not been established. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent HT at a large-volume center between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019 was performed. Patients undergoing re-transplantation or dual-organ transplantation were excluded. PTDM was defined as hemoglobin A1C≥6.5% or a random glucose &gt;200 after HT among patients with no prior history of DM. Predictors of PTDM by sex were analyzed with logistic regression, and post-transplant outcomes were analyzed with Chi-Square analysis. Results: Among 317 transplant patients without pre-transplant DM, 71 (22.4%) patients were identified who had PTDM: 24 females (33.7%), 47 males (66.2%). There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between males and females who developed PTDM including age, race, pre-transplant HTN, calcineurin or steroid dosing at 1 month and 1 year post-transplant. Baseline HTN (OR 2.9, [1.3, 6.7], p=0.009) and mean steroid dose over the first 2 years post-transplant (OR 1.2, [1.0, 1.3], p=0.006) were predictors of PTDM in females but not in males, and mean tacrolimus dose was a predictor in males (OR 1.1, [1.0, 1.2], p=0.001) but not in females. Time to PTDM diagnosis did not differ by sex (log-rank p=0.56). Additionally, post-transplant outcomes in patients with PTDM including acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, coronary allograft vasculopathy and death did not differ by sex. Conclusion: PTDM is a common complication of HT. Our study suggests that risk factors for PTDM among HT recipients differ by sex. Future studies should investigate the mechanisms underlying these differences to further guide sex-specific post-HT care.

Transplant Center Attitudes Toward Early Liver Transplant for Alcohol-associated Liver Disease.

Many centers have removed 6-mo pretransplant alcohol abstinence requirements to provide early liver transplant (ELT) for individuals with severe alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), but the practice remains controversial. Using data collected from a nationally distributed survey, this study examines the practices and attitudes of transplant centers in the United States regarding ELT. A 20-item survey designed to assess center practices and provider attitudes was distributed to 225 medical and surgical directors from 143 liver transplant centers via email. Surveys were completed by 28.9% (n = 65) of directors and 39% (n = 56) of transplant centers. All responding centers reported evaluating patients for ELT. Circumstances for considering ELT included <6 mo of survival without a transplant (96.4%) and inability to participate in alcohol addiction therapy pretransplant (75%). Most (66%) directors indicated their center had established criteria for listing candidates with severe ALD for ELT. Regarding important factors for ELT candidate listing, 57.1% indicated patient survival, 37.5% indicated graft survival, and 55.4% indicated having a low risk of relapse. Only 12.7% of directors affirmed the statement, "Six months of pretransplant abstinence decreases the risk of relapse." More centers are providing ELT for severe ALD. Inability to participate in alcohol addiction therapy and <6 mo of survival are commonly reported circumstances for considering ELT. Continued investigation of posttransplant outcomes in patients receiving ELT is essential to establishing a national consensus for distributing this valuable resource.

Comparison of Intraaortic Balloon Pump and Impella 5.5 as Heart Transplant Bridging Strategies

BackgroundTemporary mechanical circulatory support is increasingly utilized as a bridge to heart transplantation. The Impella 5.5 (Abiomed) has achieved anecdotal success as a bridge since receiving US Food and Drug Administration approval. The purpose of the current study was to compare waitlist and posttransplant outcomes of patients bridged with intraaortic balloon pumps (IABPs) to those receiving Impella 5.5 therapy. MethodsPatients listed for heart transplantation between October 2018 and December 2021 who received IABP or Impella 5.5 at any time during waitlist course were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Propensity-matched groups of recipients with each device were created. Competing-risks regression for mortality, transplantation, and removal from waitlist for illness was performed according to the method of Fine and Gray. Posttransplant survival was censored at 2 years. ResultsOverall, 2936 patients were identified, of whom 2484 (85%) were supported with IABP and 452 (15%) received Impella 5.5. Patients with Impella 5.5 support had more functional impairment, higher wedge pressures, higher rates of preoperative diabetes and dialysis, and more ventilator support (all P < .05). Waitlist mortality was significantly worsened in the Impella group and transplantation was less frequent (P < .001). However, survival at 2 years after transplant was similar in both complete (90% vs 90%, P = .693) and propensity-matched cohorts (88% vs 83%, P = .874). ConclusionsPatients bridged with Impella 5.5 were sicker than IABP-bridged patients and less frequently transplanted; however, posttransplant outcomes were similar in propensity-matched cohorts. The role of these bridging strategies in patients listed for heart transplantation should be continually assessed with future allocation system changes.

Prognosis of patients with systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease on the lung transplant waiting list: a retrospective study

Advanced systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) can be treated with lung transplantation. There is limited data on lung transplantation outcomes in patients with SSc-ILD, in non-Western populations.We assessed survival data of patients with SSc-ILD, on the lung transplant (LT) waiting list, and evaluated post-transplant outcomes in patients from an Asian LT center. In this single-center retrospective study, 29 patients with SSc-ILD, registered for deceased LT at Kyoto University Hospital, between 2010 and 2022, were identified. We investigated post-transplant outcomes in recipients who underwent LT for SSc-ILD, between February 2002 and April 2022. Ten patients received deceased-donor LT (34%), two received living-donor LT (7%), seven died waiting for LT (24%), and ten survived on the waiting list (34%). Median duration from registration to deceased-donor LT was 28.9 months and that from registration to living-donor LT or death was 6.5 months. Analysis of 15 recipients showed improved forced vital capacity with a median of 55.1% at baseline, 65.8% at 6 months, and 80.3% at 12 months post-transplant. The 5-year survival rate for post-transplant patients with SSc-ILD was 86.2%. The higher post-transplant survival rate at our institute than previously reported suggests that lung transplantation is acceptable in Asian patients with SSc-ILD.

Treatment strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in the transplant era: Focusing on the Japan criteria.

To clarify the Japan criteria (JC), as proposed in 2019, in order to identify the most appropriate treatment methods for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence and assess the feasibility of pre-living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) downstaging within these criteria. The subjects of this study were 169 LDLT patients with HCC recurrence. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses of the factors contributing to HCC recurrence after LDLT and clarified the post-transplant outcomes of pre-LDLT downstaging. Univariate and multivariate analysis identified beyond the JC (p = 0.0018) and a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio > 2.01 (p = 0.029) as independent risk factors. Patients who met the JC had significantly higher recurrence-free and overall survival rates after LDLT (p < 0.0001) than those who did not (p = 0.0002). The post-transplant outcomes of patients within the JC after downstaging were significantly better than those of patients beyond the JC (p = 0.034) and equivalent to those within the JC without downstaging. Even for HCC recurrence, the JC could play an important role in deciding on the best treatment strategy, and downstaging within the JC had good post-transplant outcomes.

Impact of bacterial infections prior to liver transplantation on post-transplant outcomes in patients with cirrhosis

Bacterial infections are frequent in patients with cirrhosis and increase the risk of death and drop-out from liver transplant (LT) waiting list. In patients with bacterial infections, LT is frequently delayed because of the fear of poor outcomes. We evaluated the impact of pre-LT infections on post-LT complications and survival. From 2012 to 2018, consecutive patients transplanted at the Hospital of Padua were identified and classified in two groups: patients surviving an episode of bacterial infection within 3 months before LT (study group) and patients without infections before LT (control group). Post-LT outcomes (complications, new infections, survival) were collected. A total of 466 LT recipients were identified (study group n= 108; control group n= 358). After LT, the study group had a higher incidence of new bacterial (57% vs. 20%, p <0.001) and fungal infections (14% vs. 5%, p= 0.001) and of septic shock (8% vs. 2%, p= 0.004) than the control group. Along with the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and alcohol-related cirrhosis, bacterial infection pre-LT was an independent predictor of post-LT infections (odds ratio= 3.92; p <0.001). Nevertheless, no significant difference was found in 1-year (88% vs. 89%, p= 0.579) and 5-year survival rates (76% vs. 75%, p= 0.829) between the study group and control group. Within the study group, no association was found between the time elapsed from infection improvement/resolution to LT and post-LT outcomes. Patients with pre-LT infections have a higher risk of new bacterial and fungal infections and of septic shock after LT. However, post-LT survival is excellent. Therefore, as soon as the bacterial infection is improving/resolving, transplant should not be delayed, but patients with pre-transplant bacterial infections require active surveillance for infections after LT. Bacterial infections increase mortality and delay transplant in patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation (LT). Little is known about the impact of adequately treated infections before LT on post-transplant complications and outcomes. The study highlights that pre-LT infections increase the risk of post-LT infections, but post-LT survival rates are excellent despite the risk. These findings suggest that physicians should not delay LT because of concerns about pre-LT infections, but instead should actively monitor these patients for infections after surgery.

CARC21: Outcomes in Transplant Recipients Bridged with Impella Support: A GUARDIAN-Heart Subgroup Analysis

Background: The 2018 UNOS allocation changes prioritized recipients bridged with temporary MCS, which has recently increased in use. Also in 2018, the SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System (CTS) was introduced, which maintains donor heart temperatures continuously between 4°C - 8°C, potentially minimizing freezing-related myocardial injury. A subgroup analysis of the GUARDIAN Heart Registry examined outcomes in transplant recipients bridged using Impella. Methods: The GUARDIAN registry is an international, multicenter registry assessing outcomes after heart transplant comparing CTS preservation and traditional ice-cold (ICE) donor heart storage. Retrospective review of clinical outcomes in recipients bridged with an Impella were examined using summary statistics. Further analysis with ongoing enrollment will be available for presentation. Results: A total of 47 recipients with an Impella device received donor hearts preserved using either CTS (n=33) vs ICE (n=14). The two groups had similar baseline characteristics except the CTS cohort had significantly longer average ischemic time (175.3 vs and 223.9 minutes, p value = 0.02, ICE vs CTS,) and greater procurement distance travelled (170.2 vs 447.5 miles, p value < 0.001, ICE vs CTS). Post-transplant rates of severe PGD were low (14.3% vs 3.0%, p value = 0.15, ICE vs CTS, respectively). Survival was excellent with 100% 30-day survival in both cohorts. Conclusions: Despite significantly longer ischemic times by 48.6 minutes and over 2.5x farther organ procurement distance travelled, the use of the CTS was associated with excellent post-transplant outcomes in patients bridged using an Impella device. Considering ischemic time is a known risk factor for post-transplant PGD, these data support continued study of CTS use to optimize outcomes, in particular in an era of increasing distance travelled for organ procurement and complex bridging strategies.

Early initiation of low-dose gilteritinib maintenance improves posttransplant outcomes in patients with R/R FLT3mut AML.

Early initiation of low-dose gilteritinib maintenance improves posttransplant outcomes in patients with R/R FLT3mut AML.

Functional status predicts pediatric heart transplant outcomes: A united network for organ sharing (UNOS) database study

Functional status predicts waitlist survival in adult heart transplantation and is an independent predictor of outcomes in pediatric liver transplantation. This has not been studied in pediatric heart transplantation. Study aims were to determine the association of: (1) functional status at listing with waitlist and post-transplant outcomes, and (2) functional status at transplant with post-transplant outcomes in pediatric heart transplantation. Retrospective United Network of Organ Sharing database study of pediatric patients listed for heart transplant between 2005 and 2019 with Lansky Play Performance Scale (LPPS) scores at listing. Standard statistical methods were used to assess relationships between LPPS and outcomes (waitlist and post-transplant). Negative waitlist outcome was defined as death or removal from waitlist due to clinical deterioration. There were 4,169 patients identified, including 1,080 with LPPS 80-100 (normal activity), 1,603 with LPPS 50-70 (mild limitations), and 1,486 with LPPS 10-40 (severe limitations). LPPS 10-40 correlated with negative waitlist outcomes (HR 1.69, CI 1.59-1.80, p < 0.0001). While LLPS at listing had no association with post-transplant survival, those with LPPS 10-40 at transplant had inferior 1-year post-transplant survival compared to those with LPPS ≥50 (92% vs 95%-96%, p=0.0011). Functional status was an independent predictor of post-transplant outcomes in patients with cardiomyopathy. A functional improvement of ≥20 points between listing and transplant (N=770, 24%) was associated with higher 1-year post-transplant survival (HR 1.63, 95% CI: 1.10-2.41, p=0.018). Functional status is associated with waitlist and post-transplant outcomes. Interventions targeting functional impairment may improve pediatric heart transplantation outcomes.

Percutaneous ethanol injection is an acceptable bridging therapy to hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation.

Locoregional therapies (LRT) are employed for bridging patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Although the main LRT options include transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) is an alternative with considerably lower costs. This study is a pioneering evaluation of the natural history of PEI bridging to OLT as compared to TACE. All consecutive cirrhotic patients with HCC enlisted for OLT (2011-2020) at a single center were analyzed. Patients were divided into three LRT modality groups: PEI, TACE, and PEI+TACE. The primary study outcome was waitlist dropout due to tumor progression beyond Milan criteria. A comparison of post-transplant outcomes of patients as stratified by LRT modality also was performed. One hundred twenty-nine patients were included (PEI=56, TACE=43, PEI+TACE=30). The dropout rate due to tumor progression was not different among the three groups: PEI=8.9%, TACE=14%, PEI+TACE=16.7% (p=0.54). Thirteen (76.4%) patients underwent OLT after successful downstaging (3 [75%] in the PEI group, 5 [83.3%] in the TACE group, and 5 [71.4%] in the PEI+TACE group). For the 96 patients undergoing OLT, 5-year post-transplant recurrence-free survival was PEI=55.6% vs. TACE=55.1% vs. PEI+TACE=71.4% (p=0.42). Complete/near-complete pathological response rate was similar among groups (p=0.82). Dropout rates and post-transplant recurrence-free survivals related to PEI were comparable to those of TACE. This study supports the use of PEI alone or in combination with TACE for HCC patients awaiting OLT whenever RFA is not an option.