post-PCI Angina Research Articles

The association between stent type and developing angina pectoris following percutaneous coronary intervention

BackgroundAngina pectoris can occur in up to 40% of patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There is limited data assessing whether the type of stent implanted during revascularization can predict post-PCI angina symptoms.MethodsIn this study, data regarding revascularization characteristics including the stent type in patients admitted for PCI was collected. Prospective data including occurrence of angina and the presenting class, new onset ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and other clinical outcomes were collected at 1, 3, and 6-month follow-up intervals. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the potential predictors of angina symptoms at 6-month follow-up.ResultsA total of 787 patients (64.5% males) undergoing PCI with three stent types (Orsiro, Promus, and Xience) were included in the study. The occurrence of post PCI angina pectoris and new STEMI was similar among the stent types (p > 0.05). A linear association was found between the development of new STEMI (p = 0.018) and stroke (p = 0.003) and the worsening of angina class. The stent type was not a predictor of angina during the follow-up period. Other variables including dyslipidemia (odds ratio (OR) (95% CI), 1.51 (1.08; 2.10)), prior coronary artery disease (CAD) (OR (95% CI), 1.63 (1.02; 2.61)), and previous hospitalization (OR (95% CI), 2.10 (1.22; 3.63)) were independent predictors of angina.ConclusionsAlthough the type of stent may not have an association with the post-PCI angina, other predictors such as dyslipidemia and previous CAD and hospitalization may predict recurrence of cardiac angina. The class of angina severity may have a linear association with new-onset STEMI and stroke.

Myocardial perfusion imaging by 15O-H2O positron emission tomography predicts clinical revascularization procedures in symptomatic patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft.

We wanted to assess if 15O-H2O myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in a clinical setting can predict referral to coronary artery catheterization [coronary angiography (CAG)], execution of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and post-PCI angina relief for patients with angina and previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). We analysed 172 symptomatic CABG patients referred for 15O-H2O positron emission tomography (PET) MPI at Aarhus University Hospital Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Centre, of which five did not complete the scan. In total, 145 (87%) enrolled patients had an abnormal MPI. Of these, 86/145 (59%) underwent CAG within 3 months; however, no PET parameters predicted referral to CAG. During the CAG, 25/86 (29%) patients were revascularized by PCI. Relative flow reserve (RFR) (0.49 vs. 0.54 P = 0.03), vessel-specific myocardial blood flow (MBF) (1.53 vs. 1.88 mL/g/min, P < 0.01), and vessel-specific myocardial flow reserve (MFR) (1.73 vs. 2.13, P < 0.01) were significantly lower in patients revascularized by PCI. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the vessel-specific parameters yielded optimal cutoffs of 1.36 mL/g/min (MBF) and 1.28 (MFR) to predict PCI. Angina relief was experienced by 18/24 (75%) of the patients who underwent PCI. Myocardial blood flow was an excellent predictor of angina relief on both a global [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.85, P < 0.01] and vessel-specific (AUC = 0.90, P < 0.01) level with optimal cutoff levels of 1.99 mL/g/min and 1.85 mL/g/min, respectively. For CABG patients, RFR, vessel-specific MBF, and vessel-specific MFR measured by 15O-H2O PET MPI predict whether subsequent CAG will result in PCI. Additionally, global and vessel-specific MBF values predict post-PCI angina relief.

Angina After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Patient and Procedural Predictors.

Twenty percent to 40% of patients are affected by angina after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), which is associated with anxiety, depression, impaired physical function, and reduced quality of life. Understanding patient and procedural factors associated with post-PCI angina may inform alternative approaches to treatment. Two hundred thirty patients undergoing PCI completed the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7) and European quality of life-5 dimension-5 level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires at baseline and 3 months post-PCI. Patients received blinded intracoronary physiology assessments before and after stenting. A post hoc analysis was performed to compare clinical and procedural characteristics among patients with and without post-PCI angina (defined by follow-up SAQ-angina frequency score <100). Eighty-eight of 230 patients (38.3%) reported angina 3 months post-PCI and had a higher incidence of active smoking, atrial fibrillation, and history of previous myocardial infarction or PCI. Compared with patients with no angina at follow-up, they had lower baseline SAQ summary scores (69.48±24.12 versus 50.20±22.59, P<0.001) and EQ-5D-5L health index scores (0.84±0.15 versus 0.69±0.22, P<0.001). Pre-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) was lower among patients who had no post-PCI angina (0.56±0.15 versus 0.62±0.13, P=0.003). Percentage change in FFR after PCI had a moderate correlation with angina frequency score at follow-up (r=0.36, P<0.0001). Patients with post-PCI angina had less improvement in FFR (43.1±33.5% versus 67.0±50.7%, P<0.001). There were no between-group differences in post-PCI FFR, coronary flow reserve, or corrected index of microcirculatory resistance. Patients with post-PCI angina had lower SAQ-summary scores (64.01±22 versus 95.16±8.72, P≤0.001) and EQ-5D-5L index scores (0.69±0.26 versus 0.91±0.17, P≤0.001) at follow-up. Larger improvements in FFR following PCI were associated with less angina and better quality of life at follow-up. In patients with stable symptoms, intracoronary physiology assessment can inform expectations of angina relief and quality of life improvement after stenting and thereby help to determine the appropriateness of PCI. URL: https://www. gov; Unique identifier: NCT03259815.

Persistent or Recurrent Angina Following Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.

Persistent or recurrent angina after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has substantial patient morbidity and economic impact. As knowledge of the pathophysiology of this condition has evolved, new tools for accurate diagnosis and treatment have become available. We provide a current, comprehensive review of mechanisms of post-PCI angina, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic options. The routine use of functional testing during PCI may enable more accurate revascularization. Coronary vasomotor disorders commonly cause angina after PCI in the absence of obstructive epicardial CAD. Invasive coronary vasoreactivity testing can enable phenotype-guided therapy of coronary vasomotor disorders with improvement in angina. Multiple nonpharmacologic modalities to treat refractory angina are under development. A comprehensive approach to the diagnosis of persistent or recurrent angina after PCI with noninvasive and invasive techniques is required. An individualized, phenotype-guided management using lifestyle, pharmacologic, and nonpharmacologic modalities is necessary to optimize outcomes.

Post-percutaneous coronary intervention angina: From physiopathological mechanisms to individualized treatment.

Chronic ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a multifactorial disease with different underlying pathogenetic mechanisms. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is widely used in patients with IHD in order to reduce angina recurrence. However, after complete or incomplete revascularization procedures, patients may still present anginal symptoms, with a detrimental impact on quality of life and prognosis. This review summarizes the pathogenic mechanisms and the main challenges encountered in the diagnosis and management of post-PCI angina.

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function

Approximately 40% of patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography for investigation of angina are found to have no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA). Abnormal coronary function underlies coronary vasomotion syndromes including coronary endothelial dysfunction, microvascular angina, vasospastic angina, post-PCI angina and myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). Each of these endotypes are distinct subgroups, characterized by specific disease mechanisms. Diagnostic criteria and linked therapy for these conditions are now established by expert consensus and clinical guidelines. Coronary function tests are performed as an adjunctive interventional diagnostic procedure (IDP) in appropriately selected patients during coronary angiography. This aids differentiation of patients according to endotype. The IDP includes two distinct components: a diagnostic guidewire test and a pharmacological coronary reactivity test. The tests last approximately 5 minutes for the former and 10-15 minutes for the latter. Patient safety and staff education are key. The diagnostic guidewire test measures parameters of coronary flow limitation (fractional flow reserve [FFR], coronary flow reserve [CFR], microvascular resistance [index of microvascular resistance (IMR)], basal resistance index, and vasodilator function [CFR, resistive reserve ratio (RRR)]). The pharmacological coronary reactivity test measures the vasodilator potential and propensity to vasospasm of both the main coronary arteries and the micro-vessels. It involves intra-coronary infusion of acetylcholine and glyceryl trinitrate (GTN). Acetylcholine is not licensed for parenteral use and is therefore prescribed on a named-patient basis. Vasodilatation is the normal, expected response to infusion of physiological concentrations of acetylcholine. Vascular spasm represents an abnormal response, which supports the diagnosis of vasospastic angina. The purpose of this practical guide is to provide information on the preparation and administration of the IDP in clinical practice. It discusses some key preparation and safety considerations, as well as tips for procedural success. The IDP supports stratified medicine for a personalized approach to health and wellbeing.

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: a Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function.

Approximately 40% of patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography for investigation of angina are found to have no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA). Abnormal coronary function underlies coronary vasomotion syndromes including coronary endothelial dysfunction, microvascular angina, vasospastic angina, post-PCI angina and myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). Each of these endotypes are distinct subgroups, characterized by specific disease mechanisms. Diagnostic criteria and linked therapy for these conditions are now established by expert consensus and clinical guidelines. Coronary function tests are performed as an adjunctive interventional diagnostic procedure (IDP) in appropriately selected patients during coronary angiography. This aids differentiation of patients according to endotype. The IDP includes two distinct components: a diagnostic guidewire test and a pharmacological coronary reactivity test. The tests last approximately 5 minutes for the former and 10-15 minutes for the latter. Patient safety and staff education are key. The diagnostic guidewire test measures parameters of coronary flow limitation (fractional flow reserve [FFR], coronary flow reserve [CFR], microvascular resistance [index of microvascular resistance (IMR)], basal resistance index, and vasodilator function [CFR, resistive reserve ratio (RRR)]). The pharmacological coronary reactivity test measures the vasodilator potential and propensity to vasospasm of both the main coronary arteries and the micro-vessels. It involves intra-coronary infusion of acetylcholine and glyceryl trinitrate (GTN). Acetylcholine is not licensed for parenteral use and is therefore prescribed on a named-patient basis. Vasodilatation is the normal, expected response to infusion of physiological concentrations of acetylcholine. Vascular spasm represents an abnormal response, which supports the diagnosis of vasospastic angina. The purpose of this practical guide is to provide information on the preparation and administration of the IDP in clinical practice. It discusses some key preparation and safety considerations, as well as tips for procedural success. The IDP supports stratified medicine for a personalized approach to health and wellbeing.

Reactive Oxygen Species Cause Exercise-Induced Angina in a Myocardial Ischaemia-Reperfusion Injury Model.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) effectively treats obstructive coronary artery syndrome. However, 30–40% patients continue to have angina after a successful PCI, thereby reducing patient satisfaction. The mechanisms underlying persistent angina after revascularisation therapy are still poorly understood; hence, the treatment or guideline for post-PCI angina remains unestablished. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the mechanisms underlying effort angina in animals following myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury. Phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (p-ERK), a marker for painful stimulation-induced neuronal activation, was used for the investigation. After a forced treadmill exercise (FTE), the number of p-ERK-expressing neurons increased in the superficial dorsal horn of the I/R model animals. Moreover, FTE evoked hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production in the I/R-injured heart, inducing angina through TRPA1 activation on cardiac sensory fibres. Notably, the treatment of a TEMPOL, a reactive oxygen species scavenger, or TRPA1−/− mice successfully alleviated the FTE-induced p-ERK expression in the dorsal horn. The production of H2O2, a reactive oxygen species, through physical exercise contributes to angina development following I/R. Hence, our findings may be useful for understanding and treating angina following revascularisation therapy.

De-escalation of antianginal medications after successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Frequency and relationship with health status

Successful chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can markedly reduce angina symptom burden, but many patients often remain on multiple antianginal medications (AAMs) after the procedure. It is unclear when, or if, AAMs can be de-escalated to prevent adverse effects or limit polypharmacy. We examined the association of de-escalation of AAMs after CTO PCI with long-term health status. In a 12-center registry of consecutive CTO PCI patients, health status was assessed at 6 months after successful CTO PCI with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and the Rose Dyspnea Scale. Among patients with technical CTO PCI success, we examined the association of AAM de-escalation with 6-month health status using multivariable models adjusting for revascularization completeness and predicted risk of post-PCI angina (using a validated risk model). We also examined predictors and variability of AAMs de-escalation. Of 669 patients with technical success of CTO PCI, AAMs were de-escalated in 276 (35.9%) patients at 1 month. Patients with AAM de-escalation reported similar angina and dyspnea rates at 6 months compared with those whose AAMs were reduced (any angina: 22.5% vs 20%, P = .43; any dyspnea: 51.8% vs 50.1%, P = .40). In a multivariable model adjusting for complete revascularization and predicted risk of post-PCI angina, de-escalation of AAMs at 1 month was not associated with an increased risk of angina, dyspnea, or worse health status at 6 months. Among patients with successful CTO PCI, de-escalation of AAMs occurred in about one-third of patients at 1 month and was not associated with worse long-term health status.

Mechanisms and diagnostic evaluation of persistent or recurrent angina following percutaneous coronary revascularization.

Persistence or recurrence of angina after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may affect about 20-40% of patients during short-medium-term follow-up. This appears to be true even when PCI is 'optimized' using physiology-guided approaches and drug-eluting stents. Importantly, persistent or recurrent angina post-PCI is associated with a significant economic burden. Healthcare costs may be almost two-fold higher among patients with persistent or recurrent angina post-PCI vs. those who become symptom-free. However, practice guideline recommendations regarding the management of patients with angina post-PCI are unclear. Gaps in evidence into the mechanisms of post-PCI angina are relevant, and more research seems warranted. The purpose of this document is to review potential mechanisms for the persistence or recurrence of angina post-PCI, propose a practical diagnostic algorithm, and summarize current knowledge gaps.

Reduction in postpercutaneous coronary intervention angina in addition to gastrointestinal events in patients on combined proton pump inhibitors and dual antiplatelet therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a standard treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Studies have shown that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can potentially attenuate the antiplatelet effects of P2Y12 inhibitors with associated adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Medline was searched using Pubmed from inception to 8 November 2017 for randomized control trials studying the effect of PPIs on coronary artery disease with concomitant use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Overall, 692 studies were identified of which five randomized control trials were included. Statistical analysis was done using RevMan, version 5.3. Five studies with 6239 patients (3113 on PPI with DAPT and 3126 with only DAPT) were included. Our analysis showed that PPI significantly reduced the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) bleed [22 vs. 66, odds ratio (OR)=0.37, confidence interval (CI)=0.23-0.61, P≤0.0001, I=0%], GI ulcers and GI erosions (7 vs. 18, OR=0.39, CI=0.16-0.94, P=0.04, I=0%), and the incidence of post-PCI unstable angina in patients treated with PPI and P2Y12 agents (46 vs. 67, OR=0.67, CI=0.45-0.99, P=0.05, I=0%). There was an insignificant difference in myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular cause of mortality. A trend toward decreased all-cause mortality with PPIs was noted. Heterogeneity was calculated using I. Concomitantly administered PPIs with P2Y12 inhibitors have a protective effect on the GI events. It also decreases the post-PCI angina without increased adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Abstract 125: Burden &amp; Timing of Recurrent Angina in Patients With Incomplete Revascularization Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background: Angiographic incomplete revascularization (IR) has been reported in 30-60% of cases following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The extent to which IR contributes to the burden, timing &amp; characteristics of angina &amp; the role of angina in contributing to adverse outcomes has not been defined. Methods: A retrospective review of 200 patients with IR after PCI from 9 US cardiology practices was performed to determine the frequency of recurrent angina. All angiograms were reviewed for residual coronary artery disease by an independent core laboratory. IR was defined as residual diameter stenosis &gt;50% by quantitative coronary angiography in any epicardial coronary or major side branch. Recurrent angina was defined as documented worsening of angina or initiation of either ranolazine or long-acting nitrates. Angina was assessed at 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, &amp; greater than 12 months. We report an interim analysis. Results: In the overall population of 200 patients, patients were mostly male (62%) with a mean age of 63.7±13.3 years, &amp; mean BMI of 30.2±6.4. There was a high prevalence of comorbidities including hypertension (93.4%), hyperlipidemia (88.5%), diabetes (52.5%), &amp; prior MI (36.1%). Of the 200 patients, 61 (30%) patients developed recurrent angina at a mean follow-up time of 549 days. Among those with recurrent angina, 26% of patients developed recurrent angina within 30 days of the index PCI procedure. At 3-, 6-, 9, &amp; 12-months, 46%, 62%, 67%, &amp; 80% of patients, respectively, had recurrent angina. The remaining 20% of patients experienced post-PCI angina after 12 months. Baseline demographic factors associated with recurrent angina included hypertension, diabetes, history of angina, prior PCI, &amp; African American ethnicity (See Table 1). Conclusions: Angiographically identified IR alone does not adequately identify patients at risk for the development of recurrent angina. Among a cohort of 200 patients with angiographically identified IR, only 30% of patients developed recurrent angina post-PCI. Almost half of patients with recurrent angina experienced it within 3 months of the index PCI procedure. Several common cardiovascular comorbidities including diabetes, hypertension &amp; prior PCI were associated with recurrent angina post-PCI. Complete analysis will be presented.

Prediction of Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Myocardial Ischaemia.

Following revascularisation the majority of patients obtain symptom relief and improved quality of life. However, myocardial ischaemia may recur or persist in a significant patient subset. Symptom recurrence is usually attributed to inaccurate evaluation of epicardial stenosis, incomplete revascularisation or stent failure and disease progression. However, technological advances with modern imaging and/or physiological evaluation of epicardial plaques have not solved this issue. Conversely, recent clinical studies have shown that abnormal coronary vasomotion and increased myocardial resistance are frequent determinants of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) myocardial ischaemia. Strategies to enhance prediction of post-PCI angina include proper selection of patients undergoing revascularisation, construction of clinical prediction models, and further invasive evaluation at the time of coronary angiography in those with high likelihood.

Prediction of residual angina after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Angina relief is a major goal of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, about one in five patients continue to have angina after PCI. Understanding patient factors associated with residual angina would enable providers to more accurately calibrate patients' expectations of angina relief after PCI, may support different follow-up strategies or approaches to coronary revascularization, and could potentially serve as a marker of PCI quality. Among 2573 patients who had PCI at 10 US hospitals for stable angina, unstable angina, or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), 24% reported angina 6 months after PCI, as assessed with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency score (categorized as none vs. any angina; score = 100 vs. <100). Post-PCI angina was more common in those patients treated for unstable angina (30 vs. 20% stable angina and 21% NSTEMI, P < 0.001). Using a hierarchical logistic regression model, eight variables were independently associated with angina after PCI, including younger age, poor economic status, depression, and greater number of antianginal medications at the time of PCI (c-index = 0.75). The amount of angina at the time of PCI was more predictive of post-PCI angina in patients with stable or unstable angina when compared with NSTEMI (pinteraction = 0.01). The model demonstrated excellent calibration, both in the original sample (slope 1.04, intercept -0.01, r = 0.98) and in bootstrap validation. Based on a large, multicentre cohort of PCI patients, we created a model of residual angina 6 months after PCI that can provide patients realistic expectations of angina relief, guide follow-up strategies, support the use of residual angina as a means of comparing PCI quality, and enable comparative effectiveness research.

Temporal Trends in Patient-Reported Angina at 1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization in the Stent Era

Background— Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has witnessed rapid technological advancements, resulting in improved safety and effectiveness over time. Little, however, is known about the temporal impact on patient-reported symptoms and quality of life after PCI. Methods and Results— Temporal trends in post-PCI symptoms were analyzed using 8879 consecutive patients enrolled in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–sponsored Dynamic Registry (wave 1: 1997 [bare metal stents], wave 2: 1999 [uniform use of stents], wave 3: 2001 [brachytherapy], wave 4, 5: 2004, 2006 [drug eluting stents]). Patients undergoing PCI in the recent waves were older and more often reported comorbidities. However, fewer patients across the waves reported post-PCI angina at one year (wave 1 to 5: 24%, 23%, 18%, 20%, 20%; P trend &lt;0.001). The lower risk of angina in recent waves was explained by patient characteristics including use of antianginal medications at discharge (relative risk [95% CI] for waves 2, 3, 4 versus 1: 1.0 [0.9 to 1.2], 0.9 [0.7 to 1.1], 1.0 [0.8 to 1.3], 0.9 [0.7 to 1.1]). Similar trend was seen in the average quality of life scores over time (adjusted mean score for waves 1 to 5: 6.2, 6.5, 6.6 and 6.6; P trend =0.01). Other factors associated with angina at 1 year included younger age, female gender, prior revascularization, need for repeat PCI, and hospitalization for myocardial infarction over 1 year. Conclusion— Favorable temporal trends are seen in patient-reported symptoms after PCI in routine clinical practice. Specific subgroups, however, remain at risk for symptoms at 1 year and thus warrant closer attention.