Postoperative Readmission Research Articles

Outcomes of bariatric surgery in obese patients with heart failure:a meta-analysis

Abstract Background Patients with heart failure possess an increased risk for adverse outcomes with noncardiac surgery (1). While bariatric surgery is frequently performed in patients with obesity, there remains a limited understanding of the impact of bariatric surgery in obese patients with heart failure. Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of bariatric surgery versus nonsurgical management in obese patients with heart failure. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, through February 2024, for studies evaluating outcomes in obese patients with heart failure who underwent bariatric surgery compared to nonsurgical management. Outcomes assessed were postoperative atrial fibrillation, all-cause mortality, and hospital readmission. We used a fixed-effect model to calculate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) in R studio for outcomes assessed. In outcomes where significant heterogeneity was found (P< 0.05 and I2 > 60%), a random effects model was used. Results A total of 3 studies were identified, consisting of 260,186 patients. Compared to nonsurgical management, bariatric surgery was associated with a significant reduction in postoperative atrial fibrillation (HR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.62-0.84), all-cause mortality (HR 0.50; 95%CI 0.35-0.72), and hospital readmission (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.69-0.78) in obese patients with heart failure. Conclusion Our study suggests that bariatric surgery significantly reduces post-operative atrial fibrillation, mortality, and hospital readmission among obese patients with heart failure.Our findings demonstrate that bariatric surgery should be considered as a viable intervention in obese patients with heart failure. Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings.Forest Plots of Outcomes Assessed

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Non-Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (pNETs): A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background: This systematic review, using pairwise and network meta-analyses, aimed to compare the intraoperative, short-term, and long-term postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery (OS) for the management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). Methods: Studies reporting on the effects of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery on pNETs published before November 2023 on PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL were analyzed. Results: Thirty-two studies with 5379 patients were included in this review, encompassing 2251 patients undergoing MIS (1334 laparoscopic, 508 robotic, and 409 unspecified MIS) and 3128 patients undergoing OS for pNETs management. Pairwise meta-analysis revealed that the MIS group had a significantly shorter length of hospital stay ((a low certainty of evidence), MD of −4.87 (−6.19 to −3.56)); less intraoperative blood loss ((a low certainty of evidence), MD of −108.47 (−177.47 to −39.47)); and decreased tumor recurrence ((a high certainty of evidence), RR of 0.46, 95% CI (0.33 to 0.63)). Subgroup analysis indicated a higher R0 resection rate and prolonged operative time for laparoscopic surgery than for OS. The network meta-analysis ranked the robotic approach as superior in terms of the length of hospital stay, followed by the laparoscopic and OS arms. Furthermore, it favored both MIS approaches over OS in terms of the R0 resection rate. No significant differences were found in severe postoperative complications, postoperative fistula formation, mortality, readmission, reoperation, or conversion rates. Conclusions: This review supports the safety of MIS for the treatment of pNETs. However, the varying certainty of evidence emphasizes the need for higher-quality studies.

Hospital Network Centralization of Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Is Associated With Reduced Early Complication Rates But Not Reduced Readmission or Reoperation Rates: A Retrospective Database Study

Background: Hospital networks centralize primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) within their existing systems to develop specialized service lines with higher surgical volumes to reduce adverse events. It is not known what role hospital network centralization has had on primary TJA outcomes. Purpose: We sought to determine whether the degree of hospital network centralization for primary TJA is associated with (1) 90-day postoperative complication rates, (2) 90-day hospital readmission rates, or (3) 1-year revision rates. Methods: We conducted a retrospective database study of Medicare Part A beneficiaries who underwent inpatient primary TJA for osteoarthritis in 2016 and 2017 ( n = 523,142 patients); individual hospital-level characteristics and hospital networks were also identified ( n = 360 unique networks, n = 3339 hospitals). Patients having surgery at a hospital that was not a member of a health care network were excluded ( n = 163,998 patients) because we wanted to examine only the role of network structures on outcomes; this resulted in a cohort of 359,144 patients. Hospital network centralization, which was defined as the percentage of total network cases performed at the highest volume hospital and categorized into quartiles (eg, lowest 25% of networks by concentration, 26%–50% of networks by concentration, etc). Primary outcomes included postoperative 90-day complications, 90-day readmissions, and 1-year revisions. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions evaluated associations of hospital network centralization with outcomes and controlled for relevant patient-level and hospital-level covariates, including hospital network volumes. Results: Odds of 90-day complications were lower in the most centralized hospital networks than in least centralized networks (odds ratio [OR] = 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75, 0.95). Degree of centralization was not associated with readmissions or 1-year revision rates. Non-modifiable patient and individual hospital characteristics appeared to have a greater association with complications, readmissions, and early revision rates than hospital network centralization or volume. Conclusion: This retrospective database study found that increased centralization of primary TJA within a hospital network was associated with lower 90-day complication rates but not with 90-day readmission or 1-year revision rates. This suggests that structural changes within hospital networks may be beneficial to reduce early complications in this patient population. In addition, our findings suggest that risk adjustment in assessing non-modifiable patient and hospital risk factors may be important when assessing TJA outcomes.

Association between different patterns of obesity and the short-term outcomes of gastric cancer surgery.

Previous studies have shown that general and central obesity are each linked to adverse outcomes in gastrointestinal cancers. However, their combined effect on gastrointestinal cancers surgery outcomes were less understood. This study aims to integrate both general and central obesity to examine the outcomes of gastric cancer surgery in different obesity patterns. We retrospectively analyzed 248 patients who underwent gastric cancer surgery between 2021 and 2023 in a single institute. The Inbody720 body composition analyzer measured body composition. We evaluated the relationship between obesity patterns - combining BMI with central obesity measures (waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, visceral fat area) - and postoperative complications and 30-day readmission. Central-only obesity were more likely to induce fistula (P = 0.025), while non-obesity was more likely to develop postoperative abdominal effusion (P = 0.049) and bleeding (P = 0.042). Central-only obesity was significantly associated with severe postoperative complications after adjustment for hypertension, diabetes, abdominal surgery history, preoperative albumin levels, age, sex, and surgical types. This remains significant even after adjusting for muscle mass. However, we did not find the same results for significant complications. Regarding 30-day readmission, there are no differences between different patterns of obesity. Central-only obesity is an independent risk factor for severe postoperative complications in gastric cancer, while a high BMI appears to be associated with a lower risk compared to non-obese patients, but not significant postoperative complications. The likelihood of readmission within 30 days post-surgery may not be related to the patient's pattern of obesity.

Prevalence, Clinical Features and Outcomes of Patients with Acute Aortic Dissection and Concomitant Lower Extremity Malperfusion

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients presenting with lower limb malperfusion (LLM) following an aortic dissection, and the outcomes of the patients repair of the dissection as the initial operative procedure. Method: We performed a retrospective medical record review at our single center of patients who presented with an aortic dissection complicated by LLM from January 2019 to June 2023, and analyzed the incidence, clinical characteristics, prognosis and reintervention of these patients. Result: The incidence of patients with an aortic dissection complicated by LLM was 6.3% (39/617) with mortality rate of 23% (9/39). LLM cases were associated with malperfusion of other organs in 77% (30/39) of patients. All surgical patients underwent initial aortic central repair, with a mortality rate of 26% (8/30). Mortality rates were 31.8% (7/22) for type A dissections and 12.5% (1/8) for type B dissections. Immediate femoral-femoral bypass grafting was performed in 10% (3/30) of cases following aortic central repair, with the majority of patients experiencing significant improvement in LLM with aortic central repair alone. The postoperative readmission rate due to LLM was 6.7% (2/30). Conclusion: Aortic dissection with lower limb malperfusion (LLM) is associated with increased pre- and postoperative mortality, especially in Type A aortic dissections versus Type B. However, for survivors of initial central aortic repair surgery, the rates of amputation and readmission for LLM are low.

Comparison of a Risk Calculator With Frailty Indices in Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Resection.

While frailty has gained attention for its utility in risk stratification, no studies have directly compared them to existing risk calculators. The objective of this study was to compare the risk stratification of the American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator (ACS-SRC), the Revised Risk Analysis Index (RAI-rev), and the Modified Frailty Index (5-mFI). The primary outcomes were 30-day postoperative morbidity, 30-day postoperative mortality, unplanned readmission, unplanned reoperation, and discharge disposition other than home. Patients undergoing anatomic lung resection for primary, nonsmall cell lung cancer were identified within the ACS National Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. Tools were compared for discrimination in the primary outcomes. 9663 patients undergoing anatomic lung resection for cancer between 2012 and 2014 were included. The cohort was 53.1% female. Median age at diagnosis was 67 (IQR 59-74) years. Perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were 10.9% (n = 1048) and 1.6% (n = 158). Rates of 30-day postoperative unplanned readmission and reoperation were 7.5% (n = 725) and 4.8% (n = 468). The ACS-SRC had the highest discrimination for all measured outcomes, as measured by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and corresponding confidence interval (95% CI). This included perioperative mortality (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.71-0.78), compared to RAI-rev (AUC 0.66, 95% CI 0.62-0.69) and 5-mFI (AUC 0.61, 95% CI 0.57-0.65; p < 0.001). The RAI-rev and 5-mFI had similar discrimination for all measured outcomes. ACS-SRC was the perioperative risk stratification tool with the highest predictive discrimination for adverse, 30-day, postoperative events for patients with cancer treated with anatomic lung resection.

Clinical outcomes of children with COVID-19 and appendicitis: a propensity score matched analysis.

Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, many children with appendicitis and COVID-19 were initially treated non-operatively and later underwent interval appendectomy. Currently, children with both appendicitis and COVID-19 frequently undergo upfront appendectomy. The impact of this return to upfront surgical management on patient outcomes is unknown. This study compared outcomes of pediatric patients with and without COVID-19 infection undergoing appendectomy. A retrospective cohort study of children < 21y who underwent appendectomy from 3/19/2020 to 7/31/2022 at 50 Pediatric Health Information System children's hospitals was conducted. Children with documented COVID-19 were identified. Exclusions included preoperative ventilator or supplemental oxygen dependence, and missing data. To evaluate COVID-19 positive versus COVID-19 negative patients, we used a propensity score matched on sociodemographics, comorbidities, laparoscopy, perforation, and hospital. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests identified differences between groups in length of stay, postoperative drain placement, 30-day re-admission, and mechanical ventilation requirements. Overall, 51,861 children of median age 11y (IQR: 8-14) underwent appendectomy, of whom 1,440 (2.3%) had COVID-19. Most were male (60.3%), White (72.1%) and non-Hispanic (61.4%). Public insurance was the most common (47.5%). We created a matched cohort of 1,360 COVID-19 positive and 1,360 COVID-19 negative children. Children with COVID-19 had shorter hospitalizations (1d, IQR: 1-4 vs. 2d, IQR: 1-5, p = 0.03), less postoperative peritoneal drain placement (2.4% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.01), and fewer 30-day readmissions (9.0% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.04). However, no difference in incidence or duration of mechanical ventilation (p > 0.05) was detected. Our findings suggest that upfront appendectomy for children with appendicitis and COVID-19 has similar outcomes compared to children without COVID-19. Level III.

Tubeless ureteroenteric anastomosis in robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion does not increase the risk of anastomotic stenosis or postoperative complications.

The objective is to demonstrate that omitting ureteral stent placement in robotic intracorporeal urinary diversion does not lead to increased risk of perioperative complications, namely ureteral strictures or anastomotic leaks. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 68 consecutive patients who underwent robotic radical cystectomy with ileal conduit creation or orthotopic neobladder by a single surgeon between January 2020 and September 2023. Chronologically, the first cohort of patients had ureteral stents placed to bridge the ureteroenteric anastomosis, and in the second cohort, stenting was omitted. Cohort 1 consisted of 28 patients with surgeries performed between January 2020 and April 2021, while cohort 2 had 40 patients who underwent surgery from April 2021 to September 2023. The cohorts were well matched with regard to patient age, gender, ASA score and rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The choice of urinary diversion was left to surgeon and patient preference, and there was no significant difference in the proportion of ileal conduits versus orthotopic neobladders within each cohort. Estimated blood loss, total operative time, inpatient length of stay and pathologic T and N staging did not statistically differ between the cohorts. Overall, there was no difference in the rates of postoperative ileus, ureteral stricture, anastomotic leak, infectious complications, and 30-day readmission rates between the groups. Tubeless ureteroenteric anastomosis in patients undergoing robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal diversion does not appear to increase the risk of anastomotic strictures or postoperative complications. Further prospective evaluation is warranted.

Primary and incisional hernias should be considered separately in clinical decisions and research: A nationwide register-based cohort study

BackgroundVentral hernias of umbilical, epigastric, and incisional types pose varied surgical challenges. Recent debates and research suggest that treatment strategies and outcomes may vary significantly based on hernia type and width. This study investigated whether differences in the risk of surgical outcomes among primary and incisional hernias are solely due to the hernia type. The primary outcome was reoperation for recurrence, and the secondary outcome was 90-day postoperative readmission. MethodsThis study was based on prospectively collected data from the Danish Ventral Hernia Database linked with the Danish Civil Registration system and the National Patient Register. Data spanned from 2007 to 2022 and included patients with umbilical, epigastric, or incisional hernias. The 3 hernia types were analyzed for the risk of reoperation for recurrence, adjusted for sex, age, emergency repair, width, use of mesh, and Charlson comorbidity index. ResultsWe included 57,312 hernias: 34,147 umbilical, 9,433 epigastric, and 13,722 incisional hernias. Compared with patients with umbilical hernias, patients with epigastric hernias had a lower risk of reoperation (hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.79–0.99) and those with incisional hernias had an increased risk (hazard ratio: 2.93, 95% confidence interval: 2.57–3.33). Postoperative 90-day readmission rates were also higher for patients with incisional hernias than for patients with umbilical and epigastric hernias. ConclusionIncisional hernias exhibited a higher risk of reoperation for recurrence and 90-day postoperative readmission, underscoring their unique nature in terms of both origin and clinical behavior. The findings suggest that primary and incisional hernias should be separate entities in medical practice and research.

Surgical Specialty Outcome Differences for Major Spinal Procedures in Low-Acuity Patients.

Retrospective Cohort Study. There is an ongoing debate as to the influence of specialty training on spine surgery. Alomari et al. indicated the influence of specialty on ACDF procedures. However, deeper analysis into other spine procedures and lower-acuity procedures has yet to occur. In this study, we aim to determine if the outcomes of the low American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (ASA 1&2) patients undergoing spine surgery vary based on whether the operating surgeon was an orthopedic surgeon or a neurosurgeon. The NSQIP databases from 2015 to 2021 were queried based on the CPT code for nine common spine procedures. Indicators of surgical course and successful outcomes were documented and compared between specialties. Neurosurgeons had minimally shorter operative times in the ASA 1&2 combined classification (ASA-C) group for cervical, lumbar, and combined spinal procedural groups. Neurosurgeons had a slightly lower percentage of perioperative transfusions in select ASA-C classes. Orthopedic surgeons had shorter lengths of stay for the cervical groups in ASA-C and ASA-1 classes (ASA-1). However, many specialty differences found in spine patients become less pronounced when considering only ASA-1 patients. Finally, postoperative complication outcomes and re-admission were similar between orthopedic and neurological surgeons in all cases. These results, while statistically significant, are very likely clinically insignificant. They demonstrate that both orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons perform spinal surgery exceedingly safely with similarly low complication rates. This lays the groundwork for future exploration and benchmarking of performance in spine surgeries across neurosurgery and orthopedics.

Risk assessment model used to predict discharge care after total hip and total knee arthroplasty: A population-based study

BackgroundTransfer to a post-acute care facility or hospital readmission after total joint arthroplasty represent additional costs and increased surgical and health care resource utilization. Accurate prediction of post-acute care factors could help providers to plan the patient's discharge destination and have a positive impact on postoperative outcomes and readmission rates. ObjectiveTo develop a risk assessment model to predict discharge care after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). DesignA retrospective longitudinal observational study. Settingsand participants: This study included 209 patients who underwent primary unilateral THA or TKA at a major academic medical center in Switzerland from January 2018 to December 2019. MethodsA collection of computerized- and paper-recorded data identified the discharge destination, socio-demographic factors, comorbidities, and other factors related to the patient. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to describe the predictors of post-surgical discharge destinations. ResultsThe characteristics associated with post-acute care after primary unilateral THA or TKA were the absence of a caregiver, advanced age, female gender, presence of walking aids, high ASA score, and comorbidity severity. A prediction model demonstrated that these six characteristics were associated 52 % with discharge to a post-acute care destination. ConclusionsThis study allowed us to identify predictors of discharge to a post-surgical destination. Predictive models can be efficiently used to better predict which patients are predisposed to post-acute care after hospital discharge. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal criteria for different destinations.

Do Racial Disparities Impact Healthcare Costs and Resource Utilization after Total Joint Replacements?

Background Racial disparities currently exist in healthcare and can have a significant impact on patient outcomes and access to quality care. Previous studies have indicated that black patients are more likely to experience delays in treatment and increased surgical complications. Hispanic patients have more comorbidities and increased complications when undergoing orthopaedic surgeries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of racial disparities on postoperative complications and readmission rates following Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA). Methods The largest single healthcare network database was queried to identify total joint arthroplasty patients treated in a single division between 2017 and 2021. Patient demographics including age, race, gender, and comorbidities were collected. Logistic regression and odds ratio point estimate analyses were utilized to assess for associations between race (defined as Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and Others) and postoperative medical complications and surgical complications, which were collected for all patients. Patient outcomes included length of stay, hospital readmission status at 30 and 90 days postoperative, and emergency room (ER) visits up to 90 days. Results A total of 16,940 patients were included in this analysis consisting of 62% female, a mean age of 71 years and mean BMI of 29.4 kg/m2 . Racial demographics consisted of 61.6% White, 12.3% Black, 24.1% Hispanic, 0.8% Asian, and 1.2% Other. Race was not significantly associated with increased readmissions at 30 days (p=0.2215) and hispanic patients were 14% less likely to be readmitted within 90 days (p = 0.0208) but were not found to have differences in ER visits when compared to White patients. Black and Asian patients were not significantly more likely to visit the ER within 90 days or to be readmitted to the hospital within 90 days when compared to White patients. Race was not significantly associated with postoperative medical complications or surgical complications. Conclusions This study found a higher readmission rate of up to 20% for total joint arthroplasty patients within 90 days of follow-up. Although race did not appear to be a significant determinant of additional ER visits or readmissions, there was some variation seen amongst Hispanic patients undergoing TJR with a lower likelihood of readmission at 60 and 90 days postoperative.

Complications and revision rates after total shoulder arthroplasty are similar between patients with and without diabetes mellitus

Purpose There is wide variability in the conclusions of studies examining the effects of diabetes mellitus (DM) on outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty (SA). The objective of this study was to determine if there are differences in complication profiles between patients with DM and those without undergoing anatomic and reverse total SA. Methods A retrospective review of patients undergoing SA in a single center from January 2014 to December 2019 was performed. Patients were then stratified into two cohorts, patients with controlled DM (mean hemoglobin A1C &lt; 7%) and those without. Outcomes analyzed included intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and revision surgery rates. Emergency department (ED) visits and hospital readmissions within 30 days were also recorded. Results A total of 595 patients underwent SA. No significant difference was found between the diabetes ( n = 151) and control group ( n = 444) with regard to length of stay ( P = .168), complications ( P = .286), infection rate ( P = .977), 30-day ED visits ( P = .789), and readmissions ( P = .230). The average time to revision was 26.8 months in the diabetes group and 26.6 months in the control group ( P = .989). Conclusions Following SA patients with controlled DM showed no increased risk of postoperative infection, ED visitation,hospital readmission, and revision surgery rate when compared to non-diabetics. Level of evidence Level III—retrospective cohort.

Preoperative Mental Health Disorders Affect Opioid Consumption and Perioperative Complications After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Limited evidence exists regarding the influence of mental health disorders (MHDs) on opioid use and complications after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We aimed to identify the prevalence of common MHDs among patients undergoing anatomic TSA (aTSA) and reverse TSA (rTSA). The Premier Healthcare Database was queried for patients undergoing primary aTSA and rTSA from 2016 to 2020. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, diagnosis codes were used to identify MHDs. Primary outcomes included the prevalence of MHDs, perioperative opioid consumption, and 90-day risk of postoperative complications, revision, and readmission. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to assess 90-day risk of primary endpoints while controlling for potential confounders. Statistical significance was defined as P<.05. From 2016 to 2020, 49,997 of 144,725 (34.55%) patients undergoing primary TSA had at least one diagnosed MHD. The most prevalent were depression (17.03%), anxiety (16.75%), and substance use disorder (10.20%). Patients with a MHD had higher mean hospital costs ($75,984±$43,129 vs $73,316±$39,046, P<.0001), longer mean length of stay (1.95±2.25 days vs 1.61±1.51 days, P<.0001), and higher mean total postoperative opioid use (72.00±231.55 morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs] vs 59.32±127.31 MMEs, P<.0001). Periprosthetic fractures (odds ratio, 1.20; P=.041), dislocation (odds ratio, 1.12; P=.042), and 90-day readmission rates (odds ratio, 1.26; P<.001) were significantly higher among patients with a MHD. This study found that MHDs are associated with significantly increased perioperative opioid consumption, medical and surgical complication rates, and risk of readmission after TSA. Recognition and optimization of MHDs is critical to minimizing complications and opioid consumption after TSA. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].

Eleven-Year Experience With Midline Extraperitoneal Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Germ Cell Tumors.

A midline extraperitoneal approach for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (EP-RPLND) has been associated with decreased morbidity compared to the transperitoneal approach. We aimed to review our 11-year experience in patients with germ cell tumors (GCTs) who underwent EP-RPLND at a single institution. All patients with GCT who underwent EP-RPLND between 2010 and 2021 were reviewed. Surgical, perioperative, and oncologic outcomes were reported. A logistic regression model was developed to evaluate variables predictive of early discharge. Oncologic outcomes included 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and recurrence patterns, which were analyzed according to pathology. Overall, 237 patients underwent EP-RPLND, of which 72% were administered in the postchemotherapy (PC) setting. Median follow-up was 16.7 months (interquartile range [IQR] 3.9-39.6). Median size of retroperitoneal disease was 2.8 cm (IQR 1.8-5.4), of which 16 cases were ≥ 10 cm. There were no cases of postoperative ileus or readmission due to small-bowel obstruction. Median hospital stay was 2 days (IQR 1-3). From 2020 to 2021, 73% of patients were discharged on postoperative day 1 and 89% by postoperative day 2. Thirty-one complications occurred, including 4% grade III to IV complications. In the primary setting, 2-year RFS for seminoma and nonseminomatous GCT was 0.93 (95% CI 0.84-1.00) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.72-1.00), respectively. In the PC setting, 2-year RFS for seminoma and nonseminomatous GCT was 0.88 (95% CI 0.74-1.00) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.95), respectively. Overall, only 7 patients had in-field recurrence. Midline EP-RPLND is safe and associated with rapid gastrointestinal recovery, short hospital stay, and low complication rates. It also demonstrates acceptable oncologic outcomes in the primary and PC settings, with low rates of in-field relapse.

An Assessment of Adverse Events in Patients with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome Undergoing Palatoplasty: An Analysis of the NSQIP Pediatric Database.

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Pediatric database has been used to identify factors related to adverse surgical outcomes in pediatric and craniofacial surgical procedures. Focusing on a historically "higher-risk" population, our aim was to assess the impact of demographics, comorbidities, and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22QDS) diagnosis on 30-day postoperative complications in patients undergoing primary palatoplasty. We used the 2012-2020 NSQIP Pediatric database to identify patients ≤3 years with and without 22q11.2 deletion syndrome who underwent primary palatoplasty. Demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative characteristics were compared between those with and without 22QDS. Logistic regression was used to determine if children with 22QDS were more likely to experience a 30-day postoperative complication or readmission. There were 10,745 patients ≤3 years old who underwent primary palatoplasty; 83 (0.8%) of whom had 22QDS and 10,662 (99.8%) did not. Children with 22QDS were older when they underwent primary palatoplasty and more likely to have comorbidities. A total of 513 patients (4.8%) experienced a postoperative complication within 30 days and 255 were readmitted (2.4%). Of the 513, 8 (9.6%) had a 22QDS diagnosis and 505 (4.7%) did not. A diagnosis of 22QDS was not a significant independent risk factor for a complication (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50-2.54) or readmission (aOR = 1.74; 95% CI: 0.74-4.13) within 30 days. This study found that the diagnosis of 22QDS was not an independent predictor of post-palatoplasty complication risk, and in fact 30-day complications are rare for those patients undergoing cleft palate repair, even among those patients with 22QDS.

Impact of Obesity, Smoking, and Age on 30-Day Postoperative Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Meniscus Surgery.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact that obesity, smoking, and older age have on 30-day postoperative complications, reoperations, and readmissions of patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy or meniscus repair. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried to identify meniscus surgeries and operative outcomes between 2008 and 2016. Controlled regression analysis was then performed to evaluate for an association between obesity, age, and smoking and these outcomes. While obesity showed no influence on adverse postoperative complications or reoperations, class I obesity was associated with a lower rate of readmission. Older age, smoking, and comorbidity burden were significant predictors of postoperative complications, reoperations, and/or readmissions. Age 80 years or older was particularly predictive of 30-day complications (odds ratio, 3.5; P<.001) and readmissions (odds ratio, 2.5; P=.004). Obesity is not a major risk factor for complications when undergoing meniscus surgery, while age older than 70 years predicts negative short-term postoperative outcomes. [Orthopedics. 20XX;4X(X):XXX-XXX.].

Ureter‐ileum‐interposition: Combined experience from two high‐volume centres

AbstractThe current study aimed to evaluate short‐ and long‐term complication rates and functional outcomes in a substantial cohort of patients undergoing ileal ureter interposition at two high‐volume medical centres.Materials and methodsA retrospective single‐arm analysis was conducted on patients who underwent ureter reconstruction using ileum between 2003 and 2022 at the University Clinic of Cologne and the National Cancer Institute of Ukraine. Data on aetiology, surgical techniques, pre‐ and postoperative kidney function changes, readmission rates and complication management were collected. Postoperative complications were classified according to Clavien–Dindo, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the CKD‐EPI formula.ResultsResults revealed 107 cases with consistent data. Within 90 days post‐surgery, 53% experienced complications, mainly graded as I–II. Grade III complications were seen in 13%, with two cases of grade IV complications leading to extended hospitalisation and patient death. The 90‐day mortality rate was 1.8%. Over a mean follow‐up of 52 months, clinically significant vesico‐renal refluxes occurred in 28%, with only 5.4% leading to persistent urinary tract infection. Antireflux techniques appeared to reduce urine upflow incidence compared with conventional interposition. Anastomosis stricture occurred in 15% of patients, with 63% requiring permanent re‐stenting and 37% needing re‐anastomosis. Metabolic acidosis was clinically significant in 7.5% of cases. A slight improvement in renal function was observed during the first year post‐surgery (average postoperative eGFR = 76 ± 22 ml/min; Mann–Witney U test, p = 0,0198). Affected kidney function improved in 56 (52%), was stable in 41 (38%) and deteriorated in 10 (9.3%). Loss of kidney function on the surgery side was seen in 4 (3.7%) patients and resulted in nephrectomy in 3 (2.8%) cases.ConclusionIleal ureter interposition demonstrated a favourable safety profile and functional outcomes. This surgical intervention provides an effective tension‐free bypass, irrespective of healthy ureter length.

312. THE VALUE OF DETECTING THE GASTRIC TUBE PRESSURE AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY: A PROSPECTIVE, UNCONTROLLED EXPLORATORY STUDY

Abstract Background With the increasing popularity of minimally invasive esophagectomy(MIE), the incidence of postoperative gastric conduit dilation has also shown an increasing trend. The main purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between postoperative tubular gastric dilation and internal gastric tube pressure. Methods In a prospective cohort study from November 2023 to February 2024, 54 patients undergoing MIE were enrolled. Based on postoperative chest X-ray, patients were categorized into acute gastric conduit dilation (Acd) and non-acute dilation (Non-Acd) groups. Gastric tube pressure, including static pressures(SP), peak pressures(PP), and median pressures (MP), was measured postoperatively. Acute gastric dilation was defined as the gastric tube occupying over 40% of the hemithorax on X-ray. We compared the incidence of postoperative complications, surgery-related mortality, readmission rates, and hospital stay durations. Results Of the patients, 19 experienced acute gastric dilation, while 35 did not. The Acd group showed significantly higher SP, PP, and MP (p&amp;lt;0.01). Univariate analysis identified SP, PP, MP, and upper mediastinal pleura reconstruction as risk factors for acute gastric dilation, with SP being a key predictor in multivariate analysis. Patients in the Acd group had longer hospital stays (median 13 days vs. 8 days for Non-Acd). No significant differences were noted in postoperative complications, surgery-related mortality or readmission rates. Conclusion Acute gastric conduit dilation post-MIE is linked to increased gastric tube pressure. Monitoring this pressure is both safe and feasible, offering insights into reducing acute gastric dilation through surgical improvements such as mediastinal pleura reconstruction.

Association of non-English language preference with postoperative hospital visits among California Medicaid enrollees

BackgroundPatients with non-English language preference encounter language barriers across phases of surgical care. Patients with a non-English language preference represent 35% of California households and are disproportionately insured by Medicaid. To determine whether language predicts surgical outcomes, we investigated the association of patient non-English language preference with postoperative emergency department visits and readmissions among California Medicaid enrollees. MethodsOur retrospective analysis of adult Medicaid enrollees undergoing 1 of 10 common inpatient operations using California hospital administrative data (2016–2019) modeled the association between non-English language preference and 30-day postoperative emergency department visits and readmissions using mixed effects logistic regression with hospital random intercept, adjusting for patient, operation, hospital, and community characteristics. Secondary analyses stratified by operation urgency and by insurance type in an all-payor cohort. ResultsOf 115,527 Medicaid enrollees, 17.2% had non-English language preference (n = 19,881), 66% were female (n = 73,653), and 40% were Hispanic/Latino (n = 45,541). Patients with non-English language preference experienced fewer postoperative emergency department visits (non-English language preference: 13.5%, English preference: 17.9%, P < .001) and readmissions (non-English language preference: 7.5%, English preference: 8.5%, P < .001), which persisted in adjusted models (adjusted odds ratio emergency department, 0.80, 95% confidence interval, 0.77–0.85; readmissions: adjusted odds ratio, 0.86, 95% confidence interval, 0.80–0.92). Non-English language preference was associated with fewer emergency department visits after elective (adjusted odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.73–0.88) and urgent/emergent surgery (adjusted odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.75–0.85) but not readmissions after elective surgery (adjusted odds ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.78–1.01). This pattern was only observed for Medicaid and not other insurance types. ConclusionPatients with non-English language preference who receive Medicaid have fewer postoperative emergency department visits and readmissions, even after urgent surgery. Our findings suggest that patterns of health care seeking after surgery vary by patient language, and investigating explanatory mechanisms is needed.