Postoperative Modified Harris Hip Score Research Articles

Modified trochanteric triplane osteotomy for chronic moderate to severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis - a preliminary report.

Management of chronic moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) remains controversial. We propose that the modified trochanteric triplane osteotomy(MTTO) with a 1300 angled blade plate, without removal of bone wedge, is effective for addressing moderate and severe chronic SCFE. A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent MTTO for moderate to severe chronic SCFE, with at least two years follow-up. Radiological outcomes assessed were osteotomy union, alpha angle, neck shaft angle, mechanical axis deviation and limb length discrepancy(LLD). Functional outcomes were assessed using modified Harris hip score, lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) and SF-36 questionnaire. A total of 11 patients (13 hips) underwent MTTO for chronic SCFE, with a mean age of 12.9 ± 2.1 years. The pre-operative median modified Harris Hip Score was 73. 12 had severe slip and one had moderate slip. All the osteotomies went on to unite by two months. At an average of 37 months follow up, the mean neck shaft angle was 1290, mean alpha angle was 69.70, and mean LLD was 1.05cm. There was significant improvement in the post-operative modified Harris hip score (p < 0.001), the median post-operative modified Harris hip score was 96, and the median LEFS was 78. One case had bone scan evidence of AVN, but did well with bisphosphonate therapy and one case had a superficial infection. MTTO is a safe and effective option for addressing deformities in chronic moderate and severe SCFE. However, a residual proximal femoral Cam deformity persists after this procedure which may need to be treated with a simultaneous or a staged osteochondroplasty.

Comparison of outcomes after total hip arthroplasty in hip fracture versus elective cases in patients over 60 years of age

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) allows for the replacement of impaired parts of the hip joint with artificial ones. This study aimed to compare the differences in preoperative patient profiles, postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes of two patient groups: those who underwent THA for fractures and those who underwent THA electively for diseases such as osteoarthritis (OA) and avascular necrosis (AVN). MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent THA between March 2012 and December 2021. Of 232 patients, 173 patients who met the exclusion and inclusion criteria were included. Patients were divided into two groups (Group 1: 113 patients diagnosed with OA or AVN; Group 2: 60 patients diagnosed with hip fracture). Pre- and postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Koval scores, and postoperative modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) were used to assess clinical outcomes. Demographic data and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared. After surgery, a rehabilitation protocol was initiated. ResultsPatients in Group 2 (fracture) had more preoperative comorbidities than those in Group 1 (elective). Follow-up months are 26.22 ± 19.78 (Group 1), and 27.42 ± 17.02 (Group 2) respectively (P > 0.05). There were no statistical differences in the prevalence of postoperative complications between two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with Group 1(elective), Group 2(fracture) showed lower VAS (P < 0.01) at last follow-up, and no difference in Koval score (P = 0.77) and mHHS (P = 0.96) at last follow-up. ConclusionConsidering the characteristics of the two groups and their perioperative multidisciplinary care, THA for hip fractures can provide good clinical results compared to those with elective THA.

Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy With Labral Reconstruction or Labral Repair and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Compromise of the acetabular labrum can lead to pain and loss of critical intra-articular fluid pressure. Revision labral preservation poses unique challenges due to adhesions and compromised tissue quality. The purpose of the study was to evaluate patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy with either labral reconstruction or labral repair after primary hip arthroscopy for labral tear. It was hypothesized that both procedures would lead to improved PROs. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. A systematic review of the literature was conducted with the following keywords: (revision) AND (hip OR femoroacetabular impingement) AND (arthroscop*) AND (reconstruction OR repair) in PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus in August 2023 using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria, yielding 2002 initial records. Only studies comparing PROMs between revision labral reconstruction or revision labral repair after primary hip arthroscopy for labral tear were included. Background article information was recorded, including article title, author, study design, level of evidence, patient demographics, radiographic information, intraoperative data, PROMs, psychometric thresholds, and secondary surgeries. Secondary surgery in our study was defined as any open or arthroscopic hip surgery secondary to the initial revision surgery. Forest plots were created for pre- and postoperative outcomes present in ≥3 studies. Heterogeneity was calculated using I 2 values. Four studies, including 215 revision labral reconstructions and 115 revision labral repairs of the hips, were included in this systematic review. All studies were level 3 evidence, and study periods ranged between 2009 and 2019. Mean follow-up for the reconstruction and repair groups ranged from 26.3 to 36.6 months and 30.7 to 56.4 months, respectively. The mean age for the reconstruction and repair groups varied between 27 to 34.6 years and 27.5 to 30 years, respectively. Mean postoperative modified Harris Hip Scores for the reconstruction and repair cohorts ranged from 72.0 to 81.2 and 70.8 to 84.1, respectively (I 2 = 0%). Mean visual analog scale for pain scores for the reconstruction and repair cohorts ranged from 3 to 3.5 and 2.3 to 3.9 (I 2 = 33%). Overall secondary surgery rates ranged from 10.0% to 26.7% in the labral reconstruction cohort, compared with 10.0% to 50.0% in the labral repair cohort. One study reported superior outcomes in the revision labral repair group, with 3 studies finding no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the groups. Our systematic review showed that patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy with labral reconstruction demonstrated significant improvement in postoperative outcome measures. Postoperative outcomes were similar to those of a benchmark control group of patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy and labral repair. Labral reconstruction in the revision setting appears to be an effective treatment in clinically indicated patients.

Effect of the presence of cysts in the hip joint on hip arthroscopy.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the presence and size of fibrous cysts affected postoperative results in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Between January 2010 and December 2019, a total of 261 patients (138 males, 123 females; mean age: 39.5±11.9 years; range, 18 to 66 years) who underwent hip arthroscopy with the diagnosis of cam-pincer-mixed-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral pathologies were retrospectively analyzed. The study groups (impingements and labral pathologies) and the presence of cyst (or cyst size: <5 mm, 5-8 mm, >8 mm) were used as the fixed effects, and the analysis was adjusted for baseline age, sex, and preoperative scores. Pre- and postoperative modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores that were applied to all patients were used as an indication of clinical results. The mean preoperative mHHS score of the patients with a cyst was significantly lower compared to the patients without a cyst (56.8±12.3 vs. 60.3±12.7, p=0.026). The mean change in the mHHS score and the mean percentage change in VAS score were significantly higher in the patients with a cyst compared to the patients without a cyst (mHHS score: 28.1±14.0 vs. 22.5±14.1, p=0.002; VAS score: 61.9±30.2 vs. 52.6±47.4, p=0.038). The increase in mHHS score over time for patients with a cyst was significantly higher than the patients without cysts in the pincer group (38.1±11.1 vs. 19.3±13.5, p<0.001). The patients with a cyst size of >8 mm had a significantly higher increase in the mHHS scores compared to the patients with a cyst size of <5 mm (29.5±12.9 vs. 23.5±13.8, p=0.043). Subchondral cysts in the femoral head and neck junction accompanied cam-type and mixed-type FAI, while subchondral cysts in the acetabulum accompanied pincer-type impingement. In all groups, the mean increase in mHHS scores and the mean decrease in VAS scores were higher in patients with subchondral cysts than in patients without cysts. In patients with subchondral cysts, if the lesion causing FAI is treated arthroscopically, it can positively affect the functional results.

Endoscopic gluteus medius partial tear repair with collagen patch augmentation. Clinical and imaging results

Introduction: Gluteus medius (GM) partial and total tears are often the cause of lateral hip pain. Non-surgical management is the first approach, however, open and endoscopic repair techniques have been described in refractory cases. The use of collagen patches has been proposed as an augmentation to enhance healing. This study aims to describe our technique for repairing partial tears of the GM tendon and present clinical and imaging results. Materials and methods: Prospective cohort on 15 hips with lateral hip pain and a positive Trendelenburg test, who had a partial thickness tear of the GM tendon on MRI. The patients had not responded to non-surgical treatment for at least 6 months and underwent endoscopic repair with a collagen patch augmentation between 2019 and 2022. The postoperative Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), International Hip Outcomes Tool-12 (iHOT-12), Visual Analogue Score (VAS), patient satisfaction, Trendelembug test, and control MRI to assess healing at 3 months were obtained. Results: 100% female, mean age of 56.66 years. Mean follow-up was 11 (4-24) months. Median mHHS improved significantly from 68 to 82 points (p=0.001). The median iHOT-12 improved significantly from 70 to 83 points (p=0.001). Median VAS decreased significantly from 6 to 2 (p&lt;0.001). All patients had a negative Trendelenburg test at the end of the follow-up, and all reported being satisfied. There were no complications and all cases showed healing. Conclusion: Our endoscopic technique has shown positive clinical outcomes for patients with partial ruptures, resulting in complete healing without short-term complications.

A New Arthroscopic Classification for Chondrolabral Disease in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Current classification systems for intra-articular pathology intraoperatively have been described for patients with femoroacetabular impingement rather than dysplasia. To (1) describe intra-articular findings in dysplastic hips undergoing combined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy (PAO); (2) propose a new chondrolabral classification system for dysplastic hips based on these findings; and (3) correlate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) with the newly proposed classification. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. A total of 46 hips underwent combined hip arthroscopy and PAO at our institution between September 2013 and December 2014, irrespective of symptoms or radiographic findings. PROMs were evaluated preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. At the time of hip arthroscopy, the chondrolabral junction was classified as normal without tear (1 hip, type 1); hypertrophic labrum without chondrolabral disruption (19 hips, type 2); chondrolabral disruption on the articular side, not extending into the capsular side (16 hips, type 3A); chondrolabral disruption extending through the capsular side (3 hips, type 3B); and exposed acetabular subchondral bone (7 hips, type 4). There was a significant difference in postoperative modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) (P = .020), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain scores (P = .037), and WOMAC total scores (P = .049) between chondrolabral junction types. Post hoc analyses demonstrated significant differences between type 2 (84.9 ± 12.9) and type 3A (67.8 ± 20.7; P = .198), and between type 2 and type 4 (59.3 ± 24.3; P = .011) in postoperative mHHS scores; and between type 2 (83.9 ± 12.9) and type 3A (68.9 ± 23.7; P = .045) in postoperative WOMAC total scores. In multivariate analysis, chondrolabral type 3 or type 4, age >35 years, and previous surgery were significantly correlated with worse mHHS scores at 2 years. This new chondrolabral classification is proposed to describe intra-articular pathology seen during combined hip arthroscopy and PAO, specifically in dysplastic hips. More advanced chondrolabral disease was associated with worse PROMs at 2 years.

Isolated Arthroscopic Debridement of Acetabular Labral Tears: High Rates of Failure and Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty at 13-Year Minimum Follow-up

Background: Historically, symptomatic hip labral lesions were treated with arthroscopic debridement. Hip labral repair has become the standard treatment for labral pathology; however, to date, there are limited long-term studies regarding the outcomes of isolated labral debridement. Purpose: To (1) evaluate the long-term patient-reported outcomes of isolated labral debridement, (2) report reoperation and arthroplasty rates, and (3) identify risk factors contributing to reoperation or poor clinical outcomes. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4 Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively generated cohort of 59 hips in 57 patients from 1996 to 2010 who underwent hip arthroscopy with labral debridement was performed. Only patients with Tönnis grade <3 were included. Additionally, given the time period analyzed, resection of cam morphology was not performed, and the interportal capsulotomy was not repaired. The pre- and postoperative modified Harris Hip Score; Hip Outcome Score (HOS)-Activities of Daily Living and -Sports scores; and reoperation, conversion to total hip arthroplasty, and risk factors were analyzed. Results: In total, 48 hips in 47 patients (14 men, 33 women; mean age, 48.0 ± 12.9 years) met inclusion criteria and were followed for a mean of 17 ± 3 years (range, 13-27 years). The mean preoperative Tönnis grade was 1.3 ± 0.6 (range, 0-2), the mean chondral acetabular International Cartilage Regeneration & Joint Preservation Society (ICRS) grade was 1.7 ± 1.6 (range, 0-4), the mean chondral femoral ICRS grade was 0.9 ± 1.4, and the mean acetabular labral articular cartilage grade was 2.5 ± 1.2 (range, 0-4). At the final follow-up, mean the modified Harris Hip Score, HOS-Activities of Daily Living score, and HOS-Sports score were 82.2 ± 16.6, 81.9 ± 20.5, and 82.2 ± 20.5, respectively. Nineteen hips underwent subsequent reoperation at a mean of 5.5 ± 6.2 years (range, 0.5-21.2 years) postoperatively, including 16 hips (33% overall) being converted to total hip arthroplasty. Higher acetabular ICRS chondral grades at the time of surgery were observed in patients who went on to subsequent surgery compared with those who did not (2.3 ± 1.6 vs 1.1 ± 1.5; P = .02). In reoperation-free hips, Tönnis grade demonstrated a trend of increasing over time (1.4 preoperatively vs 1.7 at radiographic follow-up; P = .08). At the final follow-up, 19 hips (40%) had undergone reoperation, and 5 additional hips (10%) were rated as “abnormal” or “severely abnormal” in function, resulting in an overall clinical failure rate of 50%. Conclusion: Isolated labral debridement was found to result in high rates of failure and reoperation, with a third of patients being converted to arthroplasty and half of patients meeting criteria for reoperation or clinical failure. Of note, for patients remaining reoperation-free, satisfactory outcome scores were observed.

Why Is There a Range in Time Returning to Preoperative Activity Habits After Femoroacetabular Impingement Treatment in Recreational Athletes?

Professional athletes showed excellent results after hip preserving procedures. However, there is still a lack of knowledge regarding the rate of return to activity and the rehabilitation time of recreational athletes. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate factors that were associated with an extended return-to-activity time in nonprofessional athletes. Retrospective, quantitative case-control study. This study included 47 cases (45 nonprofessional athletes), which were divided according to return-to-activity time (short term: 0.0-7.0mo vs long term: >7.0mo). The clinical outcome were evaluated with the modified Harris hip score, the nonarthritic hip score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the University of California, Los Angeles activity score. For statistical analysis between both groups, an unpaired student t test and a paired Wilcoxon test were used. In addition, the sports behavior, intraoperative findings, and surgical procedures were also assessed. After a mean follow-up of 4.3years (±0.6; 3.4-5.6), the overall postoperative modified Harris hip score was 81.8 points, the nonarthritic hip score was 75.8 points, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index was 36.7 points, and the University of California, Los Angeles activity score was 7.9. Compared with the preoperative results, all scores improved significantly (P < .001). Patients of the short-term return-to-activity group showed a higher preoperative activity diversity and, postoperatively, a higher rate in high-impact sports (P = .024). After mini-open arthrotomy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome treatment, 92.5% of the recreational athletes returned to sports activity. The findings did not detect factors influencing the return-to-activity time. However, a higher preoperative diversity of activities and a shift to high-level impact sport activities might support a shorter rehabilitation.

Comparing postoperative outcomes of two fully hydroxyapatite-coated collarless stems in total hip arthroplasty through propensity score matching analysis with 2 years follow-up

A fully hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated stem such as Corail stem, that compacts the cancellous bone around the stem in total hip arthroplasty (THA), is reported to have good long-term results for more than 20 years. Although various fully HA-coated stems have being used recently, it is unclear whether there are differences in the postoperative outcomes. In this study, 224 patients (234 hips) with THA using either the Corail collarless stem or the Hydra stem were enrolled. And then we performed a retrospective comparison of the data at 2 years postoperatively using propensity score matching analysis. The postoperative modified Harris hip scores in 84 hips each group were 93.6 ± 8.2 points in the Corail group and 92.8 ± 10.1 points in the Hydra group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. However, there was significantly less stem subsidence and rate of 3rd degree or greater stress shielding in the Corail group. Although these two stems were similar collarless fully HA-coated stems and clinical outcomes were favorable results in both groups at 2 years postoperatively, radiographic evaluations showed statistically significant differences between the two groups.

Total Hip Arthroplasty With Subtrochanteric Osteotomy for Developmental Hip Dysplasia: A Long-term Follow-up Study

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) for developmental hip dysplasia (DDH) often requires a subtrochanteric shortening derotational osteotomy (SDO) to limit leg lengthening, mitigate risk of peripheral nerve palsy, and reduce excessive femoral anteversion. Few studies exist detailing long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship. The aim of this study is to analyze the long-term outcomes and survivorship of an SDO-THA cohort. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent cementless THA with femoral osteotomy due to Crowe I-IV DDH between 1991 and 2001. Primary outcome measures included revision surgery for any reason and functional outcome measures using modified Harris Hip scores. Secondary outcome measures included mode of implant failure and radiographic assessment for osteotomy union, polyethylene wear, osteolysis, and implant loosening. ResultsOur review resulted in 24 SDO-THA cases in 20 patients with a mean follow-up of 19 years (range, 8-27 years). Overall survivorship was 67%. All 8 failures were treated with acetabular revision at a mean time to revision of 11 years (range, 1-25 years). Of the failures, there were 5 cases due to polyethylene wear (62.5%), 2 cases due to acetabular loosening (25%), and 1 case due to recurrent instability (12.5%). The mean postoperative modified Harris Hip score was 76 (range, 52-91) with long-term improvement of 43 points maintained (P < .001). ConclusionsTHA with SDO can produce durable long-term outcomes for the patient with DDH. It is important to consider some common reasons for revision, namely polyethylene wear and osteolysis, acetabular loosening, and recurrent acetabular dislocations.

Analysis of Factors Affecting Early Functional Recovery of Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy.

ObjectivesTo explore factors affecting the efficacy of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasia.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on 44 patients with hip dysplasia who underwent Bernese periacetabular osteotomy with a modified Smith‐Peterson approach between January 2017 and November 2019. Among them, 40 were women and four were men. The average age was 31.2 ± 9.4. Preoperative and postoperative imaging parameters were measured. The acetabular top tilt angle, lateral central edge angle, acetabular abduction angle, femoral head extrusion index, sphericity index of femoral head, Shenton line, Tonnis grade of osteoarthritis, joint congruency, p/a ratio, acetabular anteversion angle, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scale scores, and modified Harris hip score (MHHS) were observed. MHHS were divided into three clinically relevant categories: poor (<70 points), good (70–85 points), and excellent (86–91 points). Patient demographic data, as well as preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters, were subjected to univariate logistic regression analysis. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine factors influencing postoperative MHHS.ResultsThe follow‐up time was 1.0–3.9 years after surgery, with an average of 1.6 years. By the last follow‐up, MHHS increased from 70 points before surgery to 91 points after surgery (P < 0.001), WOMAC pain score decreased from 4 points before surgery to 0 points after surgery (P < 0.001). WOMAC functional score decreased (Preoperative: 18.0 [4.0]; Postoperative: 4.0 [0], P = 0.004). Six patients had sensory disturbance of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, four of which recovered completely during follow‐up. No other complications related to surgical approach, osteotomy, acetabular displacement, acetabular fixation, and postoperative stage were found. There was no significant vascular, nerve, or visceral injuries in any of the patients. On multiple regression analysis, the probability of the postoperative modified Harris hip score of a hip joint with a preoperative lateral center edge angle ≥4.5° being classified as excellent was six times that of angles <4.5° (Exp[β]: 6.249, 95% CI: 1.03–37.85, P = 0.046). Regression analysis of other factors found no significant correlation with postoperative functional scores.ConclusionOverall functional scores post‐PAO significantly improved, and pain symptoms were significantly reduced. Patients with a preoperative lateral center edge angle ≥4.5° had better joint function after surgery.

Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Open Hip Abductor Repair.

Background:Open repair for gluteus medius and minimus tears is a common surgical treatment for patients with lateral hip pain associated with abductor tears; however, clinically meaningful outcomes have not been described after open surgical treatment.Purpose:To define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing open gluteus medius or minimus repair, and to identify preoperative patient characteristics predictive of achieving MCID postoperatively.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a consecutive series of patients undergoing open abductor repair between July 2010 and April 2019 was conducted. Perioperative patient data collected included patient characteristics and preoperative and postoperative modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) score. Paired t tests were utilized to compare preoperative and postoperative PROMs and MCID was calculated for both PROMs. Multivariate logistical regression analysis was used to assess the association between preoperative variables and the likelihood for achieving MCID.Results:A total of 47 patients were included in the study. The majority of patients were female (78.7%), with an average age of 63 ± 10.7 years. The average follow-up for both the mHHS and the iHOT-33 surveys was 37.8 ± 27.9 months (range, 10-102 months). Patients demonstrated statistically significant improvements on the mHHS and iHOT-33 postoperatively (P < .001 for both). The MCIDs of mHHS and iHOT-33 were calculated to be 9.9 and 14.3, respectively. Overall, 82.9% of patients achieved MCID for mHHS and 84.1% of patients achieved MCID for iHOT-33 postoperatively. Multivariate logistical analysis demonstrated younger patients were less likely to achieve MCID for both outcome measures. Four patients (8.5%) suffered postoperative complications after open repair.Conclusion:This study defined MCID for mHHS and iHOT-33 for patients undergoing open repair of hip abductor tears, with a large percentage of patients (>80%) achieving meaningful outcomes for both outcome measures. There was a low complication rate. Younger patients were less likely to achieve MCID compared with older patients.

Micro-Core Decompression Combined with Intralesional Zoledronic Acid as a Treatment of Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head

Background: Avascular Necrosis / Osteonecrosis of the femoral head is a debilitating condition affecting the hip joint and is one of the most common causes of total hip replacement. The available treatments include pharmacological and surgical options with Total hip arthroplasty (THA) being the mainstay of treatment. We here is studying a novel technique of combining micro core decompression with intra-lesional bisphosphonate as a treatment for osteonecrosis of the hip. Materials and Methods: A prospective study of 19 hips was done. There were 11 males and 4 females ranging 42 - 63 years. Four hips were stage I, ten hips were stage IIA, three hips were stage IIb and two hips were stage III. 16 hips (40%) had stage IIb and 24 hips (60%) had stage III ONFH. The minimum period of follow up was 24 months. All patients were assessed according to the Harris Hip Score (HHS). The operative procedure include decompressing the avascular area with drilling then injecting the zoledronic acid locally. Results: The mean preoperative modified Harris Hip Score in stage I (n=4), stage IIa (n=10), stage IIb (n=3) and Stage III (n=2) were 81.9, 72.7, 68.8 and 59.2 respectively. The mean postoperative modified Harris Hip Score at two years in stage I, stage IIa, stage IIb and Stage III were 97.3, 91.1, 88.4 and 82.5 respectively. Conclusion: We found that the use of micro core-decompression with intra-lesional bisphosphonate will provide higher chances towards hip preservation especially in late cases or cases with larger lesions where core decompression may not be successful.

Does Failure to Meet Threshold mHHS & iHOT-12 Scores Correlate to Reoperations After Hip Arthroscopy?

To determine (a) if failing to achieve a patient reported outcome (PRO) threshold at 1-year is associated with reoperations at minimum 2-year follow up and (b) the outcome threshold with the highest association with future surgeries Patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy between July 2014 and December 2016 with pre-operative and 1-year post-operative modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and international Hip Outcome Tool – 12 item (iHOT-12) scores were identified. The rate of reoperation was compared for patients who achieved minimal clinical important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for each PRO against the rate of those who did not. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, relative risk, positive predictive, and negative predictive value for these thresholds were calculated. Of 369 of 425 cases (86.8%) were included. A total of 28 patients underwent reoperations (7.59%), with 14 undergoing revision arthroscopies (3.79%) and 14 converting to THA (3.79%). For mHHS, 267 (72.4%), 173 (46.9%), and 277 (75.1%) hips met MCID, SCB, and PASS respectively. For iHOT-12, 234 (63.4%), 218 (59.1%), and 280 (75.9%) hips met the respective thresholds. The highest sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were identified as iHOT-12 MCID (0.786), iHOT-12 PASS (0.786), and iHOT-12 MCID (0.77) respectively. The iHOT-12 PASS (RR = 6.36 CI95% = 5.883-6.866) was identified as having the highest RR and negative predictive value (0.974). The positive predictive value of not achieving thresholds for reoperations was low across all thresholds. In a novel approach of PRO threshold score utilization, this study identified patients at increased risk of reoperations following primary hip arthroscopy, notably those who do not achieve MCID or PASS for either mHHS or iHOT-12

Micro-core decompression combined with intralesional zoledronic acid as a treatment of osteonecrosis of femoral head: a novel technique

&lt;p class="abstract"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; Avascular necrosis (AVN)/osteonecrosis of the femoral head is a debilitating condition affecting the hip joint and is one of the most common causes of total hip replacement. The available treatments include pharmacological and surgical options with total hip arthroplasty (THA) being the mainstay of treatment. This present study is a novel technique of combining micro core decompression with intra-lesional bisphosphonate as a treatment for osteonecrosis of the hip.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="abstract"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; A prospective study of 19 hips was done. There were 11 males and 4 females ranging 42-63 years. Four hips were stage I, ten hips were stage IIA, three hips were stage IIb and two hips were stage III. 16 hips (40%) had stage IIb and 24 hips (60%) had stage III ONFH. The minimum period of follow up was 24 months. All patients were assessed according to the Harris hip score. The operative procedure includes decompressing the avascular area with drilling then injecting the zoledronic acid locally.&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="abstract"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; The mean preoperative modified Harris hip score in stage I (n=4), stage IIa (n=10), stage IIb (n=3) and stage III (n=2) were 81.9, 72.7, 68.8 and 59.2 respectively. The mean postoperative modified Harris hip score at two years in stage I, stage IIa, stage IIb and stage III were 97.3, 91.1, 88.4 and 82.5 respectively.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="abstract"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/strong&gt; We found that the use of micro core-decompression with intra-lesional bisphosphonate will provide higher chances towards hip preservation especially in late cases or cases with larger lesions where core decompression may not be successful.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="abstract"&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

Clinical Outcomes After Endoscopic Repair of Gluteus Medius Tendon Tear Using a Knotless Technique With a 2-Year Minimum Follow-Up

PurposeTo evaluate clinical outcomes in patients who underwent endoscopic gluteus medius repair with at least 2-year follow-up. MethodsThis was a single-center, single-surgeon retrospective study of 19 patients (20 hips) who underwent endoscopic knotless gluteus medius repair between August 2010 and August 2016 with ≥2 years of follow-up. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was reviewed and graded according to the Goutallier/Fuchs classification; preoperative X-rays were reviewed and graded according to the Tonnis classification. Baseline and 2-year postoperative modified Harris hip score (mHHS) and nonarthritic hip score (NAHS) were prospectively collected. The numbers of patients reaching the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic rate (PASS) were determined. ResultsTwenty hips from 19 patients met the inclusion criteria and were separated based on tear type. The study population comprised 15 (79%) females and 4 (21%) males presenting with a mean age of 51.3 ± 11.9 years and an average body mass index of 25.3 ± 3.9 kg/m2. Patients with partial tears reported average preoperative mHHS and NAHS of 33.6 ± 11.3 and 40.4 ± 14.9, respectively; at 2-year follow-up, average mHHS and NAHS of 72.9 ± 22.9 and 77.2 ± 19.7 were reported. Patients with full-thickness tears reported average preoperative mHHS and NAHS of 43.8 ± 14.7 and 46.4 ± 8.3, respectively; at 2-year follow-up, average mHHS and NAHS of 80.1 ± 8.5 and 79.5 ± 10.1 were reported. There was significant clinical improvement at 2-year follow-up, relating to both outcome measures in each subject group (P < .001). At 2 years, 90% of hips surpassed MCID, and 63% of hips achieved PASS. ConclusionEndoscopic repair for gluteus medius tears results in improved mHHS and NAHS at 2 years of follow-up compared with baseline. Most patients reach critical thresholds of minimal and satisfactory clinical improvement. Level of EvidenceLevel IV, case series with subgroup analysis

Intact Ligamentum Teres Predicts Superior Prognosis in Borderline Dysplastic Patients: A Matched Pair Controlled Study with Minimum Five-Year Outcomes Following Hip Arthroscopy

Objectives:(1) To report minimum five-year patient reported outcomes (PROs) in borderline dysplastic patients with ligamentum teres (LT) tears who underwent hip arthroscopy and (2) to compare these PROs to a pair-matched control group of borderline dysplastic hips without LT tears.Methods:Data was prospectively collected for patients who underwent hip arthroscopy during September 2008 and August 2013. Patients were included if had a preoperative diagnosis of borderline dysplasia [lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) of 18°- 25°] and had preoperative and minimum five-year postoperative modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Scores (NAHS), and Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS) scores. Exclusion criteria were Tönnis grade osteoarthritis >1, previous hip conditions, any prior ipsilateral hip surgery, or workers’ compensation status. Two borderline dysplastic groups were created. An LT tear group was matched 1:1 to a control group (no LT tear) with similar age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and laterality via propensity score matching. Significance was set at P < 0.05.Results:24 LT tear patients (24 hips) were matched 24 patients (24 hips) without an LT tear. There was no significant difference in age, sex, BMI, or laterality between groups. Mean age was 36.2 ± 17.2 and 34.9 ± 15.9 years for the control and LT tear group, respectively (P = 0.783). There were 17 (70.8%) and 16 (66.7%) females in the control and LT tear group, respectively and the mean preoperative LCEA was 23.3° and 22.2° in the control and LT tear group, respectively. No differences were observed between groups in baseline PROs, intraoperative findings, or surgical procedures, except for LT treatment. Five-year postoperative PROs were comparable in both groups, with the control group exhibiting superior Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Mental Component (VR-12M) (P = 0.041) and Short Format 12 Mental Health (SF-12M) (P = 0.042). The control group exhibited less pain and higher satisfaction with surgery; however, this trend was not significant. Finally, the LT tear group was significantly less likely to achieve the patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for mHHS (P = 0.022).Conclusion:Following hip arthroscopy, patients with borderline dysplasia and LT tears demonstrated favorable PROs at minimum five-year follow-up. Outcomes were similar to a pair-matched control group without LT tears, with the control group showing higher VR-12M and SF-12M scores. Furthermore, borderline dysplastic patients with LT tears were significantly less likely to achieve the PASS for mHHS.

Does failure to meet threshold scores for mHHS and iHOT-12 correlate tosecondary operations following hip arthroscopy?

The purpose of this study was to determine (i) if failing to achieve a patient-reported outcome (PRO) threshold at 1 year was associated with secondary operations at minimum 2-year follow-up and (ii)what outcome measure and threshold has the highest association with future surgeries. Inclusion criteria for this study were cases of primary hip arthroscopy between July 2014 and April 2017. Included patients had recorded pre-operative and 1-year post-operative modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and 12-item international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) scores. Patients were classified based on their ability to achieve minimal clinical important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for each PRO and the status of secondary operations at minimum 2-year follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio for these thresholds were calculated. Of 425 eligible cases, 369 (86.8%) had minimum 2-year follow-up. Of the included patients, 28 underwent secondary operations (7.59%), with 14 undergoing secondary arthroscopies (3.79%) and 14 converting to total hip arthroplasty (3.79%). For mHHS, 267 (72.4%), 173 (46.9%) and 277 (75.1%) hips met MCID, SCB and PASS, respectively. For iHOT-12, 234 (63.4%), 218 (59.1%) and 280 (75.9%) hips met the respective thresholds. The highest specificity, sensitivity and accuracy were identified as for iHOT-12 MCID (0.79), iHOT-12 PASS (0.79) and iHOT-12 MCID (0.77), respectively. Patients not attaining MCID and PASS for mHHS and iHOT-12 at 1-year post-operatively are at increased risk of secondary operation. The most accurate threshold associated with secondary operation (0.77) is not achieving iHOT-12 MCID. Level of evidence: retrospective case series: level IV.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of total joint arthroplasty in patients with ochronotic arthropathy.

Alkaptonuria is a rare metabolic disorder, and only a few case reports of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) for ochronotic arthropathy are described in the literature. We aim to analyse the functional and radiological outcomes of TJA in patients with ochronotic arthropathy. We retrospectively collected the data of twenty-seven TJA in sixteen patients with ochronotic arthropathy from April 2007 to December 2017. We assessed the functional outcome through pre- and post-operative modified Harris hip score (HHS) and knee society score (KSS). The hip radiographs were analysed for migration and radiolucent zones, and the knee radiographs were assessed using knee society roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. The mean follow-up was 39.4months (12-132months). Two patients died before the final follow-up. There was a statistically significant improvement in mean HHS from 17.8 preoperatively to 78 at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). Similarly, there was a significant improvement in mean KSS, following the surgery, from 27.2 preoperatively to 89.4 (p < 0.001). One patient developed deep infection, and another patient presented with aseptic loosening of the acetabular component after 7years. In the radiological evaluation at the final follow-up, signs of lysis or loosening were not noted in any of the other patients. End-stage arthritis in ochronotic arthropathy is not uncommon. These patients can have multiple joint involvements, and the need for multiple surgeries should be considered. TJA in ochronotic arthropathy leads to a significant improvement in the functional outcome compared with the preoperative disability.

Hip arthroscopy: short-term outcomes

Introduction: As a minimally invasive procedure, hip arthroscopy plays an increasingly significant role in the diagnostics and management of hip joint diseases. In this study, we present our initial experience with hip arthroscopy established at our department. Aim: Our aim was to integrate the hip arthroscopy procedure into the surgical protocol of our department, since after reviewing the relevant literature and evaluating our experience gained during study visits abroad, we consider this intervention to be a reasonable and successful technique. Method: Results of 29 hip arthroscopy interventions performed between 01 January 2017 and 15 April 2019 at our department were evaluated by comparing pre- and postoperative modified Harris hip scores (mHHS). Surgeries were performed with 30-degree scopes, typically via standard access sites. The typical indication for surgery was hip impingement syndrome. Results: Isolated cam deformity, isolated pincer deformity and mixed deformity were detected in 3, 9 and 13 cases, respectively. The mean age of the 13 male and 16 female subjects was 44.1 years. The age of our patients ranged between 22 years and 60 years. After surgery, significant improvement of mHHS was detected both according to the F-test and the Student's t-test. Conclusions: Hip arthroscopy is an appropriate treatment alternative for the surgical management of many hip conditions. Even though the learning curve is longer than that of the endoscopic examinations of other joints, adequate surgical design can minimise the risk of complications, making this intervention a potential solution for the management of multiple hip conditions. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(9): 340-346.