Post-diagnosis Use Research Articles

Evaluation of antihypertensive medications use and survival in patients with ovarian cancer: a population-based retrospective cohort study

BackgroundDespite declining mortality in most countries and in Lithuania, ovarian cancer burden has remained high. Studies have indicated that antihypertensive medications use may help to improve ovarian cancer survival, however findings remain controversial. The aim of the study was to analyse the association between post-diagnosis antihypertensive medications intake and cancer-specific survival in ovarian cancer patients.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 588 ovarian cancer cases diagnosed between 2013 and 2015. Hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to assess associations between antihypertensive medications and ovarian cancer-specific mortality.ResultsIn total, 279 (47%) patients died during the follow-up; 242 (87%) of them died due to ovarian cancer. The risk of ovarian cancer death was reduced in angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) users vs. non-users (HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.36–0.83). Subgroup analysis showed better ovarian cancer survival in higher dose ACE inhibitors users (HR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.28–0.77, p for trend 0.002); the effect was also stronger in age 51–65 years, stage I–III, surgery or chemotherapy treatment, pre-diagnosis ACE inhibitor users’ and pre-diagnosis hypertension subgroups. The risk of cancer-specific death was slightly lower among calcium-channel blocker and angiotensin-receptor blocker users and higher among beta-blocker users as compared to non-users, however chance and confounding could not be ruled out. We found no association between the use of centrally and peripherally acting antiadrenergic agents and diuretics and risk of ovarian cancer-specific mortality.ConclusionsOur findings imply that post-diagnosis use of ACE inhibitors may be associated with reduced ovarian cancer-specific mortality; however, further research is needed for the comprehensive assessment.

CANNABIS USE AMONG OLDER ADULT CANCER PATIENTS: PATTERNS OF USE AND PERCEIVED SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT

Abstract Prevalence of cannabis use among U.S. older adults (>65 years) is increasing and is common among cancer survivors of all ages. This National Cancer Institute-funded supplement supported administration of a cross-sectional survey in a state with illegal access to cannabis. This study descriptively examined weighted estimates of cannabis rates (lifetime, post-diagnosis, current) among older patients (>65 years) (N=524; 51% of full sample) with a cancer diagnosis (< two years). Of those endorsing post-diagnosis use, weighted estimates examined patterns of use (timing relative to cancer treatment, reasons for use, primary mode of use) and self-reported impact of cannabis on symptoms (since diagnosis; 5-point Likert scale for 9 symptoms). Almost half (46.0%) of older patients used cannabis in their lifetime, with 18.2% using post diagnosis and 9.8% currently using. Of patients who used cannabis following diagnosis (N=107), approximately half used during cancer treatment (7.0% had not yet started) and most common mode of use was smoking (e.g., joint) followed by edible use. Most common reasons were for pain (44.3%), sleep (43.4%) and recreationally (38.1%). Most common symptoms patients endorsed improved quite a bit, included pain (27.7%), difficulty sleeping (27.3%), and stress, anxiety, depression (23.5%). Overall, few believed cannabis worsened symptoms, with most indicating either improvement or no change. Findings indicate older oncology patients commonly use cannabis to alleviate medical or health symptoms. Oncology care teams require evidence-based recommendations and guidance to inform conversations and shared decision making about cannabis with their older patients, even within a state without a legal cannabis marketplace.

The Impact of a Positive Biofire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal Panel Result on Clinical Management and Outcomes

The gold standard diagnostic method for gastrointestinal infections is stool culture, which has limited sensitivity and long turnaround time. Infection diagnosis recently shifted to syndrome-based panel assays. This study employed the FilmArray® Gastrointestinal Panel, which detects 22 pathogens simultaneously, to investigate gastrointestinal infection and pathogen distribution in 91 stool samples of patients hospitalized at the Tzafon Medical Center, Israel, during 2020, and to compare the clinical and demographic data of negative vs. positive samples. Among the 61 positive samples (67%), the most common pathogen was Campylobacter (34.4%). Positive test results were associated with a slightly younger patient age (p = 0.012), significantly higher post-diagnosis use of antibiotics (63.9% vs. 36.7%; p = 0.014), and shorter length of stay and time to discharge (p = 0.035, p = 0.003, respectively) than negative test results. To conclude, the FilmArray® Gastrointestinal Panel enabled the early identification of causative infectious agents and enhanced clinical management and outcomes.

Common analgesics and ovarian cancer survival: the Ovarian cancer Prognosis And Lifestyle (OPAL) Study.

Most women with ovarian cancer (OC) are diagnosed with advanced disease. They often experience recurrence after primary treatment, and their subsequent prognosis is poor. Our goal was to evaluate the association between use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including regular and low-dose aspirin, and 5-year cancer-specific survival after an OC diagnosis. The Ovarian cancer Prognosis And Lifestyle study is a prospective population-based cohort of 958 Australian women with OC. Information was gathered through self-completed questionnaires. We classified NSAID use during the year prediagnosis and postdiagnosis as none or occasional (<1 d/wk), infrequent (1-3 d/wk), and frequent (≥4 d/wk) use. We measured survival from the start of primary treatment: surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for analyses of prediagnosis use, or 12 months after starting treatment (postdiagnosis use) until the earliest of date of death from OC (other deaths were censored) or last follow-up to 5 years. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and applied inverse-probability of treatment weighting to minimize confounding. We also calculated restricted mean survival times. Compared with nonusers and infrequent users, we observed better survival associated with frequent NSAID use prediagnosis (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.97) or postdiagnosis (HR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.45 to 0.94). Estimates were similar for aspirin and nonaspirin NSAIDs, new and continuous users and in weighted models. These differences would translate to a 2.5-month increase in mean survival by 5 years postdiagnosis. There was no association with acetaminophen. Our findings confirm a previous study suggesting NSAID use might improve OC survival.

Changes in Polypharmacy and Psychotropic Medication Use After Diagnosis of Major Neurocognitive Disorders: A Population-based Study in Québec, Canada.

Older adults with major neurocognitive disorder (MNCD) are often exposed to polypharmacy. We aimed to assess the prescribing and discontinuation patterns of medications following diagnosis of MNCD among community-dwelling older adults. Using the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System, we conducted a population-based cohort study comparing 1-year prediagnosis and postdiagnosis use of medications between a group of individuals older than 65 years newly diagnosed with MNCD in 2016-2017 and a control group without MNCD. The difference-in-difference method was used to estimate the prediagnosis and postdiagnosis variation in the number of medications prescribed and in the proportion of psychotropic and anticholinergic medication users. In the MNCD group, the mean number of medications used (excluding Alzheimer disease treatments) increased by 1.25 in the year after the diagnosis. The respective increase was 0.45 in the control group, yielding an adjusted difference-in-differences of 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.74; 0.87) between groups. The adjusted difference-in-differences in the proportions of antipsychotic, antidepressant, and anticholinergic medication users was 13.2% (12.5; 13.9), 7.1% (6.5; 7.7), and 3.8% (3.1; 4.6), respectively. The medication burden among older adults tends to increase in the year following a diagnosis of MNCD. The use of antipsychotics and antidepressants may explain a part of the observed increase.

647Use of menopausal hormone therapy before and after ovarian cancer diagnosis and ovarian cancer survival

Abstract Background Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use before ovarian cancer (OvCa) diagnosis has been suggested to improve survival but data on type, duration and use after treatment for OvCa are scarce. Methods We investigated MHT use and OvCa survival among participants with newly diagnosed OvCA in the Ovarian cancer Prognosis And Lifestyle (OPAL) Study. Analysis of pre-diagnosis use was restricted to 661 post-menopausal women and analysis of post-diagnosis use included 254 women aged ≤55-years. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between MHT and OvCa-specific survival. We used propensity score-based approaches to account for potential bias due to confounding by indication. Results Approximately 14% of post-menopausal women were current/recent users of oestrogen-only (7%) or oestrogen-progestin/unknown MHT (E-P=7%) at the time of diagnosis. In the pre-diagnosis analysis, E-P use was associated with better survival (HR = 0.60, 95%CI=0.37-0.98; HR = 0.93, 95%CI=0.79-1.09 per 5-years/use). The association between oestrogen-only MHT and survival was weaker and non-significant (HR = 0.74, 95%CI=0.47-1.16). Among women ≤55-years at diagnosis, the HR was 0.91 (95%CI=0.50-1.67) for new use after diagnosis regardless of type; and 0.89 (95%CI 0.51-1.54) for any use post-diagnosis compared to never users. Propensity-score-based methods showed similar estimates. Conclusions Pre-diagnosis MHT use is associated with better ovarian cancer survival. Post-diagnosis MHT use might also improve survival for women younger than 55-years, even after accounting for bias due to confounding by indication. Key messages Menopausal hormone therapy may be considered to manage menopausal symptoms in women with ovarian cancer.

Timing of Aspirin Use Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer in Relation to Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundExposure of aspirin has been associated with reduced risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence, but aspirin use in relation to CRC patients’ mortality remains undetermined. It is necessary to quantify the association between aspirin use and CRC mortality.MethodsTwo authors independently searched the electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) from 1947 through April 25, 2020. All observational studies assessing the association between different timing of aspirin use and CRC mortality were included. The effect size on study outcomes was calculated using random-effect model and presented as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity, publication bias, and quality of included studies were also assessed.ResultsA total of 34 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Prediagnosis aspirin use was not associated with CRC-specific mortality (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.79 to 1.05) and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.57 to 1.31). A statistically significant association between continued aspirin use and improvement in both CRC-specific mortality (RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.81) and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.74 to 0.93) was observed. Postdiagnosis use of aspirin was associated only with reduced all-cause mortality (RR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.69 to 0.94).ConclusionsContinued aspirin use before and after CRC diagnosis has the most advantage regarding the improvement of CRC mortality. Nevertheless, further prospective trials and mechanistic studies are highly warranted.

Cardiovascular medications and survival in people with ovarian cancer: A population-based cohort study from British Columbia, Canada

ObjectivesResearch examining survival among people with ovarian cancer following use of statins or β-blockers has been conflicting. Many studies to date have suffered from immortal time bias and/or had limited power. To address these limitations, we used time-dependent analyses to study the association between statin or β-blocker use among all people diagnosed with an epithelial ovarian cancer in British Columbia, Canada between 1997 and 2015. MethodsPopulation-based administrative data were linked for 4207 people with ovarian cancer. Statin or β-blocker use was examined using time-dependent variables for any use, cumulative duration of use and by user-group according to whether use was initiated before or after their ovarian cancer diagnosis. Cox proportional hazards models were run to estimate the association between statin or β-blocker use and survival. ResultsAny postdiagnosis use of statins was associated with better ovarian cancer survival in the full cohort (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.76, 95% CI 0.64, 0.89) and among women with serous cancers (aHR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.67–0.96). This was primarily driven by new use post-diagnosis (aHR = 0.67, 95%CI, 0.51-0.89), but there was a trend towards better survival among those who continued use from before diagnosis (aHR 0.83, 95%CI, 0.68-1.00). There was no statistically significant association between β-blocker use and survival. ConclusionPostdiagnosis statin use was associated with improved survival among people with ovarian cancer. Given the consistency of this finding in the literature, we recommend a randomized clinical trial of statin use in people with ovarian cancer.

The role of H1 antihistamines in contralateral breast cancer: a Danish nationwide cohort study

BackgroundPreclinical studies have shown both pro- and antineoplastic effects of antihistamines. Here, we evaluated the effect of H1 antihistamines on contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk, and whether cationic amphiphilic (CAD) antihistamines could increase the sensitivity to chemotherapy.MethodsFrom the Danish Breast Cancer Group clinical database, we identified all women aged ≥20 years with a first-time diagnosis of breast cancer during 1996–2012. Information on drug use, CBC and potential confounding factors was retrieved from nationwide registries. Using Cox proportional hazard regression models, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CBC associated with H1-antihistamine use.ResultsWe identified 52,723 patients with breast cancer with a total of 310,583 person-years of follow-up. Among them, 1444 patients developed a new primary tumour in the contralateral breast. Post-diagnosis use of H1 antihistamines (≥2 prescriptions) was not strongly associated with CBC risk (HR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.90–1.31) compared with non-use (<2 prescriptions). Use of CAD antihistamines among patients receiving chemotherapy was not associated with a decrease in CBC risk.ConclusionsTaken together, our findings do not suggest any association of H1-antihistamine use with CBC development.

Use of proton pump inhibitors and mortality among Icelandic patients with prostate cancer.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used drugs among cancer patients. Due to conflicting reports on their safety, we aimed to determine whether PPI use is associated with mortality among prostate cancer patients. In this population-based cohort study, we identified incident diagnoses of prostate cancer between 2007 and 2012 (n=1058). Follow-up was from 12months after diagnosis until death, emigration or end the of study. Post-diagnosis use was defined as ≥2 filled prescriptions following diagnosis. We used time-dependent Cox proportional hazard regression models to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for prostate cancer-specific and all-cause mortality associated with post-diagnosis use of PPIs. We identified 347 (32.8%) post-diagnosis PPI users and 711 (67.2%) non-users after diagnosis. Of the 347 patients using PPIs after diagnosis, 59 (17.0%) died due to any cause and 22 (6.3%) due to prostate cancer, compared with 144 (20.3%) and 76 (10.7%) among non-users after diagnosis, respectively. Post-diagnosis PPI use was not associated with prostate cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.88; 95% CI: 0.52-1.48) or all-cause mortality (HR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.73-1.43). Contrary to a previous report, this study did not find evidence of an association between post-diagnosis PPI use and mortality among prostate cancer patients.

Use of Acid-Suppressant Medications After Diagnosis Increases Mortality in a Subset of Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients.

Acid-suppressant medications, including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), are frequently prescribed and have been linked to increased risk of some gastrointestinal cancers. We examined whether post-diagnosis use of PPIs/H2RAs is associated with the risk of mortality in gastrointestinal cancer patients. We used data from patients with esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, or hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) in the national VA Central Cancer Registry diagnosed between 2002 and 2016. We identified PPI/H2RA prescriptions that were filled before and after cancer diagnosis and used time-dependent Cox regression models to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for mortality risk. We used a time-varying exposure to avoid immortal-time bias and a 3-month lag to reduce reverse causation. A sensitivity analysis was conducted varying the lag duration between the date of cancer diagnosis and the start of follow-up. PPIs were used by the majority (54% post-diagnosis use) of patients. We found no association between post-diagnosis PPI use and cancer-specific mortality in esophageal adenocarcinoma (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.84-1.02), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.87-1.12), or gastric cardia cancer (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.89-1.22) patients. Post-diagnosis PPI use was, however, associated with the increased risk of cancer-specific mortality for patients with gastric non-cardia cancer (HR 1.50; 95% CI 1.29-1.74) and HCC (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.23-1.40). The results were similar for associations with post-diagnosis use of H2RAs. There was no association with pre-diagnosis PPI/H2RA use. Post-diagnosis PPI/H2RA use was associated with the increased mortality in gastric non-cardia cancer and HCC patients.

Could aspirin be a lifesaver for prostate cancer patients in prostate cancer-specific mortality?: an update systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundCurrently, clinical studies on the prognosis of prostate cancer (PC) taking aspirin were developing, but the precise mechanism of aspirin on tumor cells was still unclear. In addition, the conclusion that aspirin can improve the prognosis of PC patients continues to be controversial. Therefore, we collected comprehensive literatures and performed our study to explore the prognostic effect of aspirin on PC.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was performed in April 2019 based on PUBMED. EMBASE. Hazard Ratio (HR) as well as its 95% confidence interval (CIs) for prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM) was extracted from eligible studies.ResultA total of 10 eligible articles were used in our study. The pooled results showed that PC patients who used aspirin or taking aspirin did not have lower PCSM than those who had not used (HR =0.89, 95% CI: 0.73–1.08, P>0.05). In subgroup analysis, we found that taking aspirin before diagnosis of prostate cancer and taking aspirin after diagnosis of prostate cancer did not have significant association with PCSM. (pre-diagnostic use, HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.72–1.06; post-diagnosis use, HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.67–1.17). In addition, we found no significant association between aspirin use or its duration and the risk of PCSM. Another important result demonstrated that aspirin use was not associated with risk of PSCM in either high risk (T ≥ 3 and/or Gleason score ≥ 8) or low risk PC patients(low-risk PC, HR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.81–1.35; high-risk PC, HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.75–1.24).ConclusionOur results demonstrated that there was no significant association between aspirin use and the risk of PCSM. At the same time, the dosage and duration of aspirin use had no statistical influence on the risk of PCSM in high/low risk PC. Further studies are needed to confirm the findings.

Post-diagnosis use of antihypertensive medications and the risk of death from ovarian cancer

ObjectiveTo examine associations between post-diagnosis use of antihypertensive (AH) medications including thiazide diuretics (TDs), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), beta blockers (BBs) [both non-selective (NSBBs) and selective (SBBs)] and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and ovarian cancer-specific survival. MethodsThis cohort study used SEER-Medicare data on 2195 women 66+ years of age who were diagnosed with ovarian cancer during 2007–2012 and who survived for at least 12 months. Use of an AH class was defined as two or more fills during the year after diagnosis. Ovarian cancer-specific death was assessed starting one year after diagnosis and continued through the end of 2013. Associations between AH use and ovarian cancer-specific mortality were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models, comparing users of a given class of AH to non-AH users. ResultsOverall, 718 (33%), 690 (31%), 521 (24%), 154 (7%) of women used a TD, ACEI, BB, or CCB, respectively, with some women (48%) using more than one class of drug. Ovarian cancer-specific mortality was found to be lower among women who used an ACEI (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63–0.92), a TD (aHR 0.82, 95%CI 0.68–0.99), or a NSBB (aHR 0.60, 95%CI 0.43–0.83), but no such association was seen in women who took a SBB or CCB. ConclusionWe observed that women who took certain forms of an AH medication during the year following a diagnosis of ovarian cancer were thereafter at a relatively reduced risk of dying from their disease. However, the potential for residual confounding by disease severity argues for a cautious interpretation.

Use of Low-Dose Aspirin and Mortality After Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Recent studies suggest that aspirin use may improve survival in patients with prostate cancer. To assess the association between postdiagnosis use of low-dose aspirin and prostate cancer mortality. Nationwide cohort study. Denmark. Men with incident prostate adenocarcinoma between 2000 and 2011. Nationwide registry data on tumor characteristics, drug use, primary prostate cancer therapy, comorbidity, and socioeconomic parameters. Postdiagnosis use of low-dose aspirin (75 to 150 mg) was defined as 2 or more prescriptions filled within 1 year after prostate cancer diagnosis. Follow-up started 1 year after prostate cancer diagnosis. In secondary analyses, low-dose aspirin use was assessed within exposure periods of 5 or 7.5 years after prostate cancer diagnosis. Of 29136 patients (median age, 70 years), 7633 died of prostate cancer and 5575 died of other causes during a median follow-up of 4.9 years (interquartile range, 3.1 to 7.2 years), through 2015. Postdiagnosis low-dose aspirin use was associated with adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.01) for prostate cancer-specific mortality and 1.12 (CI, 1.05 to 1.20) for other-cause mortality. The secondary analyses showed that prostate cancer mortality was slightly reduced with low-dose aspirin use after the 5-year (HR, 0.91 [CI, 0.83 to 1.01]) and 7.5-year (HR, 0.84 [CI, 0.72 to 0.97]) postdiagnosis exposure periods, notably among patients filling prescriptions for a large quantity of low-dose aspirin tablets during the 7.5-year period. Data on over-the-counter aspirin use were unavailable. Some residual confounding was possible as a result of incomplete data on some prognostic factors. The study did not support an overall effect of postdiagnosis low-dose aspirin use on prostate cancer mortality. However, results for extended exposure periods suggest that low-dose aspirin use might be inversely associated with prostate cancer mortality after 5 years from cancer diagnosis. Danish Cancer Society.

Independent and Joint Use of Statins and Metformin by Elderly Patients With Diabetes and Overall Survival Following HCC Diagnosis.

To investigate associations of prediagnosis and postdiagnosis use of statins and metformin on overall survival of patients with diabetes who later developed HCC. Statins and metformin have received considerable interest as potential chemopreventive agents against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, their impact on overall survival of patients with T2DM who later develop HCC (diabetic HCC patients) is unclear. Data on 2499 elderly diabetic HCC patients obtained from the SEER-Medicare program (2009 to 2013) were analyzed. Patients were categorized based on use of statins only, metformin only, both, or neither (reference for all comparisons). The patients were further categorized based on: (1) metformin dose: ≤1500 or >1500 mg/d; (2) statins functional form: hydrophilic (pravastatin and rosuvastatin) or lipophilic (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, and simvastatin); (3) statins potency: high (atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin) or low (fluvastatin, lovastatin, and pravastatin); and (4) individual statins type. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models. Prediagnosis use of metformin dose ≤1500 mg/d was associated with lower risk of death after HCC diagnosis in patients with T2DM (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.58-0.91), adjusting for postdiagnosis metformin dose, diabetes severity, Charlson comorbidity index, tumor characteristics, and other relevant factors. No association was found for prediagnosis metformin dose >1500 mg/d or postdiagnosis metformin use. Further, no association was found for either prediagnosis or postdiagnosis statins use. Prediagnosis use of metformin dose ≤1500 mg/d is associated with longer overall survival of elderly diabetic HCC patients.

Antioxidant supplementation and breast cancer prognosis in postmenopausal women undergoing chemotherapy and radiation therapy

There is a paucity of information on the prevalence of dietary supplement use in breast cancer survivors. Only a few studies have examined the impact of dietary supplements, particularly antioxidants, on breast cancer prognosis and the results are inconclusive. We examined pre- and postdiagnosis use of supplements in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors in Germany and investigated associations between postdiagnosis use of antioxidants and other supplements, and prognosis (total and breast cancer mortality, and recurrence-free survival) both overall and in women who received chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Data from 2223 postmenopausal women diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer from the population-based Mamma Carcinoma Risk Factor Investigation (MARIE) study were used. Women were interviewed at recruitment in 2002-2005 and again in 2009 and followed-up until 30 June 2015. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to estimate HRs and corresponding 95% CIs. Pre- and postdiagnosis supplement use was reported by 36% and 45% of the women, respectively. There were 240 deaths (134 from breast cancer) and 200 breast cancer recurrences after a median follow-up time of 6.0 y after the 2009 re-interview. After adjusting for relevant confounders, concurrent antioxidant use with chemotherapy or radiation therapy among 1940 women was associated with increased risk of total mortality (HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.66) and worsened recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.26, 2.68). Overall postdiagnosis supplement use was not associated with breast cancer prognosis. Antioxidant use during chemotherapy or radiation therapy was associated with worsened breast cancer prognosis in postmenopausal women. There was no overall association between postdiagnosis supplement use and breast cancer prognosis. Results from our study align with the current recommendation to possibly avoid the use of antioxidants during chemotherapy or radiation therapy.

Nonaspirin NSAIDs and contralateral breast cancer risk.

Laboratory studies suggest that inhibition of the cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 enzymes inhibits breast cancer development. We aimed to evaluate whether postdiagnosis use of COX-2 selective or other nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduce the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) among Danish breast cancer patients. From the clinical database of the Danish Breast Cancer Group, we identified 52,723 women diagnosed with breast cancer between 1996 and 2012. Data on nonaspirin NSAID use, CBC and potential confounding variables were obtained from nationwide registries. We defined postdiagnosis use (two or more prescriptions) as a time-varying covariate with a one-year lag. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CBC associated with nonaspirin NSAID use. During a median follow-up of 4.8 years (interquartile range: 2.3-9 years), 1,444 patients were diagnosed with CBC. Overall, postdiagnosis use of nonaspirin NSAID was associated with an adjusted HR for CBC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.87-1.11). The HRs did not vary substantially with duration or intensity of nonaspirin NSAID use. Moreover, similar associations were found for COX-2 selective (HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.85-1.23) and nonselective (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.82-1.13) nonaspirin NSAIDs. In conclusion, our nationwide cohort study of breast cancer patients does not suggest a reduced risk of CBC with nonaspirin NSAID use regardless of the COX-2 selectivity.

Low-dose aspirin use and risk of contralateral breast cancer: a Danish nationwide cohort study

Observational studies of aspirin use and breast cancer risk have provided inconsistent results. The occurrence of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) among breast cancer survivors may serve as a useful high-risk model to identify preventive drug effects. Using this model, we examined the association between post-diagnosis use of low-dose aspirin and risk of CBC. We identified all women recorded with a first primary breast cancer in the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Database between 1996 and 2012. Information on drug use, tumor and patient characteristics, treatment, and CBC was obtained from nationwide registries. In the main analysis, we defined time-varying post-diagnosis low-dose aspirin use as two or more prescriptions filled during follow-up and applied a one-year exposure lag. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between post-diagnosis low-dose aspirin use and CBC risk. Among 52,723 breast cancer patients, 1,444 women developed CBC during a median follow-up of 4.8 years. The adjusted HR for CBC associated with post-diagnosis use of low-dose aspirin was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.75–1.09). We observed no substantial variation in HRs according to pattern of low-dose aspirin use or estrogen receptor status of the first or the contralateral breast cancer. In conclusion, this large nationwide cohort study of breast cancer survivors does not provide strong evidence suggesting an association between post-diagnosis use of low-dose aspirin and risk of CBC.

Pre-diagnosis and post-diagnosis use of common analgesics and ovarian cancer prognosis (NHS/NHSII): a cohort study.

Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common cause of cancer death among women in the USA. In this study, our objective was to determine whether modifiable exposures to common analgesics outside of standard treatment influence prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer. The Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and Nurses' Health Study II (NHSII) are ongoing prospective studies of 121 700 and 116 429 US nurses who have completed biennial questionnaires since 1976 and 1989, respectively. We retrieved information from medical records, death certificates, or linkage to a state or Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry on ovarian cancer cases. Eligible participants had confirmed invasive, stage I-III epithelial ovarian cancer, and had data available on analgesic use. The primary objective was to determine whether self-reported regular use (≥2 days per week) of aspirin, non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or paracetamol before and after ovarian cancer diagnosis, was associated with ovarian cancer-specific survival. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for these associations, adjusting for age and year of diagnosis, disease stage, and histology. Between June 1, 1976, and May 31, 2012, for the NHS and between June 1, 1989, and May 31, 2013, for NHSII, 1789 participants of the NHS and NHSII studies were diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer and 1143 (64%) were eligible to be included in this study; 1031 (90%) of 1143 cases were included in the pre-diagnosis exposure analysis and 964 cases (84%) in the post-diagnosis exposure analysis. Compared with never-users, participants who reported recent (current use in the past 2 years) post-diagnosis use of aspirin (HR 0·68 [95% CI 0·52-0·89]) and non-aspirin NSAIDs (HR 0·67 [95% CI 0·51-0·87]) had an improved ovarian cancer-specific survival. Any type of analgesic use pre-diagnosis, and post-diagnosis use of paracetamol, were not positively associated with ovarian cancer-specific survival. In analyses of change in analgesic use from pre-diagnosis to post-diagnosis, those participants who became recent users of aspirin (HR 0·44 [95% CI 0·26-0·74]) or became recent users of non-aspirin NSAIDs (HR 0·46 [95% CI 0·29-0·73]) post-diagnosis had a lower risk of ovarian cancer-specific death than never-users. Recent use of aspirin or non-aspirin NSAIDs, defined as current use in the past 2 years, after diagnosis appears to improve ovarian cancer-specific survival. If these results are confirmed in further studies, further research should explore potential synergistic effects of anti-inflammatory medications used in combination with standard ovarian cancer therapies to improve the prognosis for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, The Marsha Rivkin Center for Ovarian Cancer Research.

Abstract 1192: Independent and joint use of statins and metformin on overall survival after diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A SEER-Medicare matched study

Abstract Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a lethal malignancy that currently ranks fourth in cancer-related deaths in the US and is projected to become the third leading cause of cancer death in the US by 2030. Thus, there is a pressing need to identify modifying risk factors to improve survival after diagnosis of HCC. Statins and metformin are among the most commonly prescribed medications in the elderly in the US and there are experimental data suggesting that these medications may improve overall survival after cancer diagnosis; however, results from observational studies have been equivocal. We therefore investigated the potential benefits of pre- and post-diagnosis use of statins and metformin both independently and jointly on overall survival after diagnosis of HCC. Methods: The study was performed using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER-18) registry linked to Medicare claims data and included 8,922 elderly (≥65 years) patients diagnosed with HCC between 2009-2013. Data on metformin and statins use were extracted from the Medicare Part D Claims file and the patients were grouped as statins only users, metformin only users, both statins and metformin users, or neither (i.e., non-users, referent group). We assessed association of both pre-diagnosis (≥2 years) and post-diagnosis statins and metformin use on risk of death after diagnosis of HCC. Statins users were further categorized into high potency statins users (simvastatin, atorvastatin, and rosuvastatin) or low potency statins users (pravastatin, lovastatin, and fluvastatin) and compared with non-users. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for multiple risk factors, including age sex, race, cancer stage at diagnosis, cancer grade, first course therapy, neighborhood level education and income, Charlson comorbidity index, and diabetes severity index. Results: Compared with non-users, post-diagnosis statins use was independently associated with 27% lower risk of death after diagnosis of HCC (HR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.60-0.88; p-value = 0.002), adjusting for pre-diagnosis statins use and other risk factors. Further analysis showed that the association for post-diagnosis statins use is evident only among high potency statins users (HR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.60-0.88; users versus non-users) but not low potency statins users (HR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.55-1.25; users versus non-users). No association was found for pre-diagnosis statins use or for pre- or post-diagnosis metformin use. Conclusions: This study suggests that post-diagnosis statins use, particularly high potency statins use, may improve overall survival after diagnosis of HCC. Metformin use, both before and after diagnosis of HCC, is not associated with overall survival. Citation Format: Samuel O. Antwi, Zhuo Li, Kabir Mody, Tushar C. Patel. Independent and joint use of statins and metformin on overall survival after diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A SEER-Medicare matched study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1192.