Ten years after the first meeting, Genoa hosted again an update on colorectal polyps. Gian Andrea Binda organized a extremely successful congress that took place in the elegant venue of Villa Quartara surrounded by a wonderful silent park. It provided a one-day comprehensive update of all the aspects of the latest innovations on colorectal polyps. The congress was opened by an interesting session on genetics and epidemiology. Over the past few years, the genes responsible for hereditary syndromes characterized by adenomatous and hamartomatous colorectal polyposis have been identified giving us the possibility of genetic testing in clinical practice. This helps clinicians in therapeutic decision-making and allows a tailored policy of surveillance of the patients’ relatives. A reliable test to screen asymptomatic individuals and to diagnose advanced adenomas and low-stage colorectal cancers is the key tool for minimizing mortality. Unfortunately, current testing strategies are suboptimal, but promising approaches using noninvasive genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic analysis of the biological samples have been proposed. New highlights from a breathomic approach concerning the identification of specific patterns of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath were reported. The role that aspirin, metformin and phytoestrogens could play in primary prevention was also elucidated. Pathology and diagnosis were the topic of the next sessions. Histological criteria for risk assessment of malignant polyps include mainly grading, depth of penetration, lymphovascular invasion and tumor budding. Till now, colonoscopy has been the diagnostic gold standard. However, a significant number of small, flat and diminutive polyps are missed during examination decreasing the effectiveness of cancer prevention. In recent years, the adenoma detection rate has emerged as a quality assurance indicator. Several factors such as the quality of bowel preparation, the technique of examination and the new technologies improve colonoscopy results. Augmented endoscopy systems (magnification, surface dye, blue light mode, cap-assisted colonoscopy, etc.) can realistically improve diagnostic accuracy. The afternoon program was dedicated to therapeutic approaches and techniques. The lectures on endoscopic resection provided the opportunity to stress the pros and cons of the different techniques comparing the approaches of Eastern and Western countries. EMR is cheaper, less complex and less time-consuming, whereas ESD requires specialized experience with a longer learning curve, shows an higher risk of perforation but allows en bloc resection of difficult lesions. Excellent videos showed operative details for technically demanding resections and for the treatment of complications. In superficial rectal neoplasm, data suggest that fullthickness TEM achieves an higher rate of en bloc resection and R0 resection than endoscopic removal reducing significantly the need for subsequent major surgery. TAMIS is a promising new technique that allows partial and fullthickness resection of rectal lesions. Preliminary data suggest its feasibility, but further evaluation is required to assess surgical and oncologic results. Surgical treatment is sufficiently standardized in FAP but is still a matter of A. Amato Unit of Coloproctology, Hospital of Sanremo, Sanremo, Italy