Positive Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Research Articles

Prevalence and predictors of multidrug-resistant bacteremia in liver cirrhosis.

Improved knowledge of local epidemiology and predicting risk factors of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria are required to optimize the management of infections. This study examined local epidemiology and antibiotic resistance patterns of liver cirrhosis (LC) patients and evaluated the predictors of MDR bacteremia in Korea. This was a retrospective study including 140 LC patients diagnosed with bacteremia between January 2017 and December 2022. Local epidemiology and antibiotic resistance patterns and the determinants of MDR bacteremia were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. The most frequently isolated bacteria, from the bloodstream, were Escherichia coli (n = 45, 31.7%) and Klebsiella spp. (n = 35, 24.6%). Thirty-four isolates (23.9%) were MDR, and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase E. coli (52.9%) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (17.6%) were the most commonly isolated MDR bacteria. When Enterococcus spp. were cultured, the majority were MDR (MDR 83.3% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.003), particularly vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecium. Antibiotics administration within 30 days and/or nosocomial infection was a significant predictor of MDR bacteremia (OR: 3.40, 95% CI: 1.24-9.27, p = 0.02). MDR bacteremia was not predicted by sepsis predictors, such as positive systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA). More than 70% of strains that can be treated with a third-generation cephalosporin have been cultured. In cirrhotic patients, antibiotic administration within 30 days and/or nosocomial infection are predictors of MDR bacteremia; therefore, empirical administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics should be considered when these risk factors are present.

Elevated Delta Neutrophil Index (DNI) as a Predictor of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) In Patients with Generalized Peritonitis at Prof Dr. I.G.N.G. Ngoerah Hospital, Denpasar

Background: Generalized peritonitis is an emergency case in the field of surgery. Which includes an inflammatory process in the peritoneum. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is a defense response to a stressor. Delta Neutrophil Index (DNI) is a parameter that reflects the ratio of infection and inflammation. This study examines the role of DNI as a predictor of SIRS in generalized peritonitis patients at Prof. Dr. IGNG Ngoerah General Hospital. Method: Cross-sectional analytic observational research. Data collection was from July 2022 to October 2022. Patients diagnosed with generalized peritonitis were taken for blood samples. The DNI examination was carried out at the Surya Husadha Hospital Laboratory. Samples were excluded if they suffered from immunodeficiency diseases, autoimmune diseases and refused to participate. The DNI value is determined by the cut-off point on the ROC curve. Bivariate analysis using Chi square test and multivariate analysis using logistic regression test. The p value <0.05 indicates a significant result. Result: This study involved 55 respondents with 41 positive SIRS respondents and 14 negative SIRS respondents. ROC curve analysis showed the DNI value with a cut-off point of 8.9 (sensitivity 85.4% and specificity 85.7%). Bivariate analysis of the DNI 8.9 with the incidence of SIRS obtained RR 3 (p = 0.000; 95% C1 1.11- 6.90). Multivariate analysis of DNI values with the incidence of SIRS showed a significant relationship (p = 0.000). Conclusion: DNI value of 8.9 is an excellent predictor of SIRS in patients with generalized peritonitis.

Final-year medical students’ perspective: a survey on the use of computed tomography in sepsis

ObjectivesTo determine the perspective of final-year medical students on the use of computed tomography (CT) in patients with sepsis.MethodsA total of 207 questionnaires were distributed to final-year medical students at a large university medical center, and 113 returned questionnaires met the criteria for inclusion in the analysis. Questions referred to sepsis guidelines, CT indications, and the use of contrast agents. Control variables included a level of practical experience as a final-year student (trimester of student’s practical year) and previous radiological experience. Statistical hypothesis tests such as the Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test were performed.ResultsThe majority of participating students, 85% (n = 91/107), considered a Systemic Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score ≥ 2 as a diagnostic criterion for sepsis. The presence of ≥ 2 positive systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria was considered relevant for diagnosing sepsis by 34% (n = 34/100). Ninety-nine percent (n = 64/65) of the participants who fully agreed with a SOFA score ≥ 2 being relevant for diagnosing sepsis would also use it as an indication for a CT scan. Seventy-six percent (n = 78/103) of the students rated a known severe allergic reaction to contrast agents as an absolute contraindication for its administration. Ninety-five percent (n = 78/82) considered radiation exposure as problematic in CT examinations, especially in repeat CTs.ConclusionMost final-year medical students were familiar with the sepsis criteria. Still, some referred to outdated diagnostic criteria. Participants saw the ability to plan further patient management based on CT as a major benefit. Most participants were aware of radiation as a risk of CT.Critical relevance statementMore detailed knowledge of CT in septic patients should be implemented in the medical curriculum. Retraining of medical students could help increase student confidence potentially improving patient care.Key points1. Whereas the majority of final-year medical students were familiar with sepsis criteria, some referred to outdated diagnostic criteria.2. Participants saw the ability to plan further patient management based on CT as a major benefit.3. Most participants were aware of radiation as a risk of CT.Graphical

Fatty pancreas was associated with a higher acute pancreatitis Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome score at hospital admission.

Pancreatic fat infiltration was shown to be linked with acute pancreatitis and probably its severity. These interesting findings merit more investigation to elucidate the effect of fatty pancreas on acute pancreatitis severity. We performed a retrospective study of patients hospitalized with documented acute pancreatitis. Pancreatic fat was determined according to pancreas attenuation on computed tomography. Patients were divided into two groups, with and without fatty pancreas. The Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) score was compared. Overall, 409 patients were hospitalized with acute pancreatitis. Among them, 48 patients had fatty pancreas (group A), vs. 361 patients who did not (group B). The mean ± SD age in group A was 54.6 ± 21.3, vs. 57.6 ± 16.8 in group B ( P = 0.51). Patients in group A, had a significantly higher rate of fatty liver, as compared to group B (85.4% vs. 35.5%, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the medical history among the two groups. Fatty pancreas was associated with more severe acute pancreatitis as assessed by SIRS score at admission. The mean ± SD of SIRS score was significantly higher in group A (0.92 ± 0.87), as compared to 0.59 ± 0.74 in group B ( P = 0.009). Positive SIRS score was present in a significantly higher proportion of patients with fatty pancreas (25%), as compared to only 11.4% in group B ( P = 0.02). The occurrence of acute pancreatitis with higher SIRS score was significantly associated with fatty pancreas. Fatty pancreas may represent a predictor of acute pancreatitis severity.

Systemic Manifestation of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is Associated With Increased In-Hospital Mortality.

Introduction Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most devastating complications of total joint arthroplasty. Systemic symptoms of infection may indicate a patient who is at a higher risk of serious complications. The goal of this study was to determine if systemic symptoms of infection in the setting of PJI were associated with greater in-hospital mortality. Materials and methods We used our institutional database to identify all patients urgently treated for deep PJI from 2002-2012. Records were reviewed to collect demographics, surgical data, vital signs prior to surgical intervention, blood and intraoperative culture results, preoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and deaths that occurred during the hospital admission. Patients were classified as having systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) based on the criteria established by the American College of Chest Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Results During the 10-year timeframe of our study, 484 patients were treated emergently for deep infection, with 130 (27%) meeting SIRS criteria preoperatively and 31 (6%) of the patients with SIRS having positive blood cultures. Patients with positive blood cultures and SIRS demonstrated a higher in-hospital mortality rate (p < 0.001). Neither SIRSnor SIRS with positive blood cultures were associated with ICU admission. Discussion Occasionally, PJI can spread beyond the affected joint, showing physical symptoms of systemic illness and bacteremia. This study demonstrates that patients with SIRS and positive blood cultures are at an increased risk of in-hospital mortality. These patients should be monitored closely before definitive treatment in order to minimize their mortality risk.

Positive predictive value of a sepsis-screening protocol for patients with tetraplegia.

To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of a sepsis-screening protocol in patients with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Retrospective review of all patients with cervical SCI who screened positive for two or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria while hospitalized in acute care or inpatient rehabilitation units over a 3.5-year period. Sepsis was defined by the occurrence of (1) any culture order followed by an intravenous (IV) antibiotic within 72 hours or (2) an IV antimicrobial followed by a culture order within 24 hours. A total of 134 patients screened positive for two or more SIRS criteria. Of these, 36 patients (26.9%) were diagnosed with sepsis. Factors associated with a true-positive SIRS screen on multivariable analysis included American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A-C (vs. D; p < .001). The PPV of the screen was 38% in patients with AIS A-C and 9% in patients with AIS D. Altered mental status (AMS) was strongly associated with a diagnosis of sepsis; 16 of 18 (88.9%) of those with AMS had sepsis (p < .001). Age, sex, and neurologic level of injury were not associated with true-positive screening. For patients with new SCI, the first true-positive screen occurred a median of 31 days post-injury. The most common SIRS criteria combinations in patients with true-positive screens were elevated heart rate and either abnormal white blood cell count (43% of true positives) or abnormal temperature (26% of true positives). Abnormally low body temperature (<36°C) contributed to false-positive screening for 10 of 38 (26%) AIS D patients who screened positive. Sepsis screening using SIRS criteria in hospitalized patients with tetraplegia has a PPV of 26.9%; it is significantly higher in patients with AIS A-C versus D injuries. AMS, when combined with a positive SIRS screening, is strongly associated with sepsis.

Predictors and risk factors for admission to critical care in cervicofacial infections: a Maxillofacial Trainee Research Collaborative (MTReC) study

Cervicofacial infections carry significant morbidity. Patients present on a broad spectrum of severity, with some requiring outpatient management and others admission to higher level care. Recognition of risk factors is helpful in decision making regarding the need for admission to higher level care. Prospective data were captured on 1002 patients in 25 centres across 17 regions of the United Kingdom (UK) by the Maxillofacial Trainee Research Collaborative (MTReC). Patients admitted to critical care were compared with those who received ward-level care. Multivariate and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to identify predictors for critical care admission. Our results show that the best predictor for critical care admission is the presence of three or more features of airway compromise (AUC 0.779), followed by C-reactive protein (CRP) >100 mg/L (OR 2.70; 95% CI 1.59 to 4.58; p < 0.005), submandibular space involvement (OR 3.82; 95% CI 1.870 to 7.81; p = 0.003), white cell count (WCC) >12 × 109/ dl (1.05; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.10; p = 0.03), and positive systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria (OR 2.78; CI 1.35 to 5.80; p = 0.006). Admission to critical care is multifactorial, however, the presence of three or more features of airway compromise is the best predictor. Awareness of this alongside other key clinical findings in cervicofacial infections may allow for the early recognition of patients who may require escalation to critical care.

The Potential Diagnostic and Predictive Role of HbA1c in Diabetic, Septic Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Background As diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor of sepsis, we aimed to evaluate the possible effects of diabetes mellitus and poor glycemic control on the diagnosis of sepsis. Methods In our retrospective study, we included diabetic, septic patients—in whom the diagnosis of sepsis was based on the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria (n = 112, SIRS group)—who had HbA1c levels measured either in the previous 30 days (n = 39, SIRS 30 d subgroup) or within 24 hours after their emergency department admission (n = 73, SIRS 24 h subgroup). We later selected those patients from the SIRS group, whose sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was ≥2 (n = 55, SOFA group), and these patients were also divided based on the time of HbA1c measurement (n = 21, SOFA 30 d subgroup and n = 34, SOFA 24 h subgroup). We analyzed the relationship between laboratory parameters, length of hospital stay, and HbA1c. Results We found a significant positive correlation between glucose and HbA1c (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively), significant negative correlations between white blood cell count (WBC) and glucose (p=0.01, p=0.02, respectively), WBC and HbA1c levels (p=0.001, p=0.02, respectively) in the SIRS 24 h and SOFA 24 h subgroups. Furthermore, there was a significant positive correlation between length of hospital stay and HbA1c in the SOFA 24 h subgroup (p=0.01). No significant correlations were found in the SIRS 30 d and SOFA 30 d subgroups. Conclusion Based on our results, normal WBC with elevated HbA1c might be considered a positive SIRS criterium in diabetic, SIRS 24 h patients. Besides this potential diagnostic role, HbA1c might also be an additional prognostic biomarker in diabetic, SOFA 24 h patients.

An Audit of Blood Cultures in an Emergency Department at a Johannesburg Academic Hospital

Background: Blood cultures (BCs) are the standard test for detecting bacteraemia but have come under scrutiny on their usefulness in the Emergency Departments (EDs) as they have a low yield, tend not to alter patient management and may be subject to high contamination rates especially in resource-limited settings. Identifying patients most at risk of bacteraemia may improve BCs’ usefulness. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational, descriptive and comparative study. Reports from all BCs performed in the ED at Helen Joseph Hospital in 2017 were requested from the National Health Laboratory Service. Data from all positive BCs were used to audit cultured organisms and their sensitivity and resistance patterns. Second, clinical and laboratory data from 206 consecutively selected patients (103 positive and 103 negative BC results) were used to calculate the Shapiro score and the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria as screening tools for sepsis. Results: There was a total of 4011 BCs performed in 2017 of which 715 (17.8%) were positive. Pathogens were cultured in 400 (10.0%) of cases and 315 (7.9%) cultured known contaminants. A positive Shapiro score and SIRS criteria increased the likelihood of a positive BC by 5.6 and 2.3 times, respectively. Positive HIV status, rigors, pulse rate &gt; 115 bpm, deranged mentation, white cells &gt; 18 × 109 cells/L and creatinine &gt; 177 μmol/L were risk factors for positive BCs. Conclusion: There was a low yield of positive BCs from the ED, and using the SIRS criteria or the Shapiro score improves the pre-test probability of positive BC results in patients with suspected sepsis.

Preoperative antibiotic therapy exceeding 7days can minimize infectious complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with positive urine culture.

To explore an appropriate duration of antibiotic therapy before percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with positive urine culture. From March 2016 to May 2018, consecutive patients with positive urine culture undergoing PCNL were prospectively registered. Initial preoperative antibiotics were given empirically. If needed, antibiotics were upgraded or adjusted to susceptible antibiotic after obtaining antibiotic-sensitivity test. Postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) was the primary outcome. Among the 220 participants, the incidence of positive stone culture and SIRS were 85.5% and 36.8%. Escherichia coli (53.6%, 44.5%) and Proteus mirabilis (8.2%, 10.0%) were the top two bacteria in urine and stones. In univariable analysis, patients with postoperative SIRS had a higher rate of stone culture positivity (97.5% VS 78.4%, P < 0.001) and a shorter duration of preoperative antibiotics therapy (3.4 ± 2.7days versus 4.2 ± 2.8days, P = 0.037). The landscape of SIRS showed a declining trend as the elongation of preoperative antibiotics (P = 0.039). In a day-by-day comparison, SIRS was less prevalent in patients treated by pre-PCNL antibiotics ≥ 7days than in those with antibiotics ≤ 6days (21.7% VS 40.8%, P = 0.017). Multivariable logistic regression confirmed positive stone culture (P = 0.001, OR 11.115) as an independent risk factor and pre-PCNL antibiotics ≥ 7days (P = 0.048, OR 0.449) as an independent protective factor for SIRS. Preoperative antibiotic ≥ 7days decreased SIRS from 45.4 to 27.8% and from 9.1 to 0% in patients with a positive and negative stone culture, respectively. Exceeding seven days should be appropriate duration of antibiotic therapy before PCNL in patients with positive urine cultures.

Antibiotic Timing and Progression to Septic Shock Among Patients in the ED With Suspected Infection

Recent medical society opinions have questioned the use of early antimicrobials in patients with sepsis, but without septic shock. Is time from ED presentation to administration of antibiotics associated with progression to septic shock among patients with suspected infection? This was a retrospective cohort study from March 2007 through March 2020. All adults with suspected infection and first antimicrobial administered within 24h of triage were included. Patients with shock on presentation were excluded. We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses predicting progression to septic shock. Seventy-four thousand one hundred fourteen patient encounters were included in the study. Five thousand five hundred ten patients (7.4%) progressed to septic shock. Of the patients who progressed to septic shock, 88%had received antimicrobials within the first 5h from triage. In the multivariate logistic model, time (in hours) to first antimicrobial administration showed an OR of 1.03 (95%CI, 1.02-1.04; P< .001) for progression to septic shock and 1.02 (95%CI, 0.99-1.04; P= .121) for in-hospital mortality. When adjusted for severity of illness, each hour delayed until initial antimicrobial administration was associated with a 4.0%increase in progression to septic shock for every 1h up to 24h from triage. Patients with positive quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) results were given antibiotics at an earlier time point than patients with positive systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score (0.82h vs1.2 h; P< .05). However, median time to septic shock was significantly shorter (P< .05) for patients with positive qSOFA results at triage (11.2 h) compared with patients with positive SIRS score at triage (26 h). Delays in first antimicrobial administration in patients with suspected infection are associated with rapid increases in likelihood of progression to septic shock. Additionally, qSOFA score has higher specificity than SIRS score for predicting septic shock, but is associated with a worse outcome, even when patients receive early antibiotics.

Enhanced Antibiotic Treatment Based on Positive Urine Dipstick Infection Test Before Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Did Not Prevent Postoperative Infection in Patients with Negative Urine Culture.

Introduction: Urinary tract infection (UTI) should be treated before percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). However, the most appropriate treatment strategy in patients with negative urine culture but positive urine dipstick infection test (positive urinary leukocyte or nitrite reaction) remains unclear. Materials and Methods: From August 2016 to February 2018, 806 consecutive patients who had undergone the first-stage PCNL with negative urine culture were included. Preoperative urinalysis, antibiotic treatment, intraoperative stone culture, and postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) were prospectively recorded. The primary outcome was SIRS. The impact of preoperative antibiotics on preoperative UTI, stone culture, and postoperative SIRS was studied. Results: Among the 806 participants, the rate of positive urine dipstick infection test and SIRS were 26.8% and 7.2%, respectively. In univariable analysis, positive urinary nitrite (p < 0.001), positive urinary leukocytes (p < 0.001), positive urine dipstick infection test (p < 0.001), longer duration of pre-PCNL antibiotics (p = 0.001), higher level of pre-PCNL antibiotics (p = 0.010), infection stones (p = 0.001), and positive stone culture (p < 0.001) were risk factors for SIRS. However, multivariable analysis showed that positive stone culture (p = 0.004) and prolonged preoperative treatment with antibiotics (p = 0.021) were independent risk factors for SIRS. Although preoperative antibiotics reduced the incidence of positive urine leukocyte (p < 0.001) or nitrite reactions (p < 0.001), prolonged or upgraded preoperative antibiotics did not affect the incidence of positive stone culture. Whether stone culture was positive (p = 0.023) or negative (p = 0.025), prolonged preoperative treatment with antibiotics was associated with a higher incidence of SIRS. Conclusions: Enhanced preoperative antibiotic treatment based on positive urine dipstick infection tests was insufficient to reduce the incidence of positive stone culture but increased the risk of SIRS after PCNL in patients with negative urine cultures.

Vital signs, clinical rules, and gut feeling: an observational study among patients with fever.

BackgroundGPs decide which patients with fever need referral to the emergency department (ED). Vital signs, clinical rules, and gut feeling can influence this critical management decision.AimTo investigate which vital signs are measured by GPs, and whether referral is associated with vital signs, clinical rules, or gut feeling.Design & settingProspective observational study at two out-of-hours (OOH) GP cooperatives in the Netherlands.MethodDuring two 9-day periods, GPs performed their regular work-up in patients aged ≥18 years with fever (≥38.0°C). Subsequently, researchers measured missing vital signs for completion of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria and the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score. Associations between the number of referrals, positive SIRS and qSOFA scores, and GPs’ gut feelings were investigated.ResultsGPs measured and recorded all vital signs required for SIRS criteria and qSOFA score calculations in 24 of 108 (22.2%) assessed patients, and referred 45 (41.7%) to the ED. Higher respiratory rates, temperatures, clinical rules, and gut feeling were associated with referral. During 7-day follow-up, nine (14.3%) of 63 patients who were initially not referred were admitted to hospital.ConclusionGPs measured and recorded all vital signs for SIRS criteria and qSOFA score in one-in-five patients with fever, and referred half of 63 patients who were SIRS-positive and almost all of 22 patients who were qSOFA-positive. Some vital signs and gut feeling were associated with referral, but none were consistently present in all patients who were referred. The vast majority of patients who were not initially referred remained at home during follow-up.

Does infection prolong the QT interval?

The corrected QT (QTc) interval is a strong predictor of ischaemic heart disease and cardiovascular mortality. It may trigger lethal arrhythmias and sudden death. Risk factors include electrolyte disorders, medications, prior cardiovascular disease and genetic predisposition. We previously demonstrated that QTc intervals are prolonged in patients hospitalised with pneumonia, regardless which antibiotics were given. It is unclear whether QTc prolongation is associated with pneumonia itself or whether it occurs with other infections. To investigate any association between hospitalisation for infection and QTc prolongation. We enrolled 169 patients, 160 of whom were used for analysis. QTc was measured in seconds by routine electrocardiogram (ECG) on admission. Subsequently, daily ECG were performed for 3 days, or until discharge (whichever occurred sooner). When clinically significant QTc prolongation was detected, possible causes were investigated. Clinically significant prolongation was not observed in any patient. The QTc was slightly longer in patients hospitalised for pneumonia or upper respiratory tract infections on admission. It was also prolonged in men, in patients with ischaemic heart disease, hypertension, history of cerebrovascular accident or cancer. A very slight trend for prolongation was observed between the first and second day of monitoring, however it later returned to baseline levels. Nearly 54% of study participants had positive systemic inflammatory response syndrome scores, however no association was detected between their score and baseline QTc, or any subsequent prolongation. We found no association between hospitalisation due to infection and prolongation of the QTc interval.

Feasibility and relevance of urine culture during stone fragmentation in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a prospective study

PurposeWe evaluated if, during lithotripsy, bacteria may be detected in the irrigation fluid of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). The concordance between urine culture from stone fragmentation (SFUC), bladder (BUC), renal pelvic (RPUC) and stone (SC) was analyzed. We also assessed the correlation between variables and cultures and their association with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and of a positive SC.MethodsWe included 107 patients who underwent PCNL (n = 53) and RIRS (n = 54) from January 2017 to May 2018. Samples for RPUC were obtained by renal catheterization. Stone fragments and irrigation fluid sample were sent for culture.ResultsSFUC was positive in 17 (15.9%), BUC in 22 (20.6%), RPUC in 26 (24.3%) and SC in 30 patients (28%). The concordance between SFUC and SC was the highest among all cultures: 94.1%. SFUC and SC grew identical microorganisms in 15/17 (88.2%) patients. Out of 17 (15.9%) patients with SIRS, 8 (7.5%) had sepsis. SFUC had the highest PPV and specificity to detect positive SC and SIRS. Previous urinary tract infection, a preoperative nephrostomy, stone diameter and composition, staghorn calculi, PCNL, positive BUC, RPUC and SFUC were predictors of infected stone. Variables that indicate complex stones, complex PCNL and an infection of the upper tract were associated with SIRS.ConclusionSFUC is technically feasible, easy to retrieve and to analyze. The spectrum of SFUC potential application in clinical practice is when is not possible to perform a SC, e.g. complete dusting or during micro-PCNL.

Procalcitonin and Interleukin-6 for predicting culturenegative and culture positive bacterial sepsis in critically ill patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome

Introduction: Differentiation between culture-negative bacterial sepsis (BS), culturepositive BS and non-infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) among critically ill patients remains a diagnostic challenge to the intensive care unit (ICU) physicians. This study aimed to evaluate the role of procalcitonin (PCT) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in predicting non-infectious SIRS, culture-negative BS and culture-positive BS in the ICU. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary ICU in Pahang. The patients were divided into sepsis and non-infectious SIRS based on clinical assessment with or without positive cultures. Patients with positive cultures were further divided into bacteraemia and positive other culture. The PCT and IL-6 were measured daily over the first 3 days. Results: Two hundred and thirty nine consecutive patients diagnosed with SIRS were recruited, of whom 164 (69%) had sepsis. Among sepsis patients, there were 62 (37.8%) culture positive and 102 (62.2%) culture negative. Of these, 27 (16.5%) develop bacteraemia. The most common site of infection was respiratory (34.4%). Post-LSD analyses showed significant difference in the PCT between culture negative sepsis and SIRS (p=0.01); and positive other culture and SIRS (p=0.04). On the other hand IL-6 cannot differentiate between SIRS and negative culture sepsis (p=0.06). Both PCT and IL-6 predicted bacteraemia with an AUC of 0.70 (0.57 to 0.82) and 0.68 (0.53 to 0.70). IL-6 is independently associated with bacteraemia and other culture after adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, SAPS II score and day 1 PCT. Conclusions: Procalcitonin but not Interleukin-6 is able to differentiate SIRS from culture-negative BS. However, IL-6 is independently associated with bacteraemia and other culture.

“Phrasing questions correctly and building rapport”: A multi-disciplinary approach to pre-clinical midwifery placement training

The quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score predicts mortality in patients with suspected infection. We sought to understand how well qSOFA and the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria predict gram negative bacteraemia.We prospectively evaluated 99 patients with gram negative bloodstream infection from a single tertiary centre. We assessed the utility of SIRS and qSOFA for their rate of positivity and association with early delivery of antibiotics (<3 h).The SIRS criteria had the highest positivity rate amongst patients with gram negative bacteraemia (85%) compared to the qSOFA criteria (25%) on the day of first positive culture. Positive SIRS criteria was the only score associated with delivery of antibiotics within 3 h (Relative risk 3.5, 95% Confidence interval 1.3 to 12.5, p = < 0.02).In patients with gram negative bloodstream infection SIRS criteria was the most common positive risk score and had a higher association with early delivery of antibiotics when compared to qSOFA.

Prognostic accuracy of SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS criteria in hematological cancer patients: a retrospective multicenter study

BackgroundWith Sepsis-3, the increase in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) as a clinical score for the identification of patients with sepsis and quickSOFA (qSOFA) for the identification of patients at risk of sepsis outside the intensive care unit (ICU) were introduced in 2016. However, their validity has been questioned, and their applicability in different settings and subgroups, such as hematological cancer patients, remains unclear. We therefore assessed the validity of SOFA, qSOFA, and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria regarding the diagnosis of sepsis and the prediction of in-hospital mortality in a multicenter cohort of hematological cancer patients treated on ICU and non-ICU settings.MethodsWe retrospectively calculated SIRS, SOFA, and qSOFA scores in our cohort and applied the definition of sepsis as “life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by dysregulated host response to infection” as reference. Discriminatory capacity was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).ResultsAmong 450 patients with hematological cancer (median age 58 years, 274 males [61%]), 180 (40%) had sepsis of which 101 (56%) were treated on ICU. For the diagnosis of sepsis, sensitivity was 86%, 64%, and 42% for SIRS, SOFA, and qSOFA, respectively. However, the AUROCs of SOFA and qSOFA indicated better discrimination for sepsis than SIRS (SOFA, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.64–0.73] p < 0.001; qSOFA, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.62–0.71] p < 0.001; SIRS, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.53–0.61] p < 0.001).In-hospital mortality was 40% and 14% in patients with and without sepsis, respectively (p < 0.001). Regarding patients with sepsis, mortality was similar in patients with positive and negative SIRS scores (39% vs. 40% (p = 0.899), respectively). For patients with qSOFA ≥ 2, mortality was 49% compared to 33% for those with qSOFA < 2 (p = 0.056), and for SOFA 56% vs. 11% (p < 0.001), respectively. SOFA allowed significantly better discrimination for in-hospital mortality (AUROC 0.74 [95% CI, 0.69–0.79] p < 0.001) than qSOFA (AUROC 0.65 [95% CI, 0.60–0.71] p < 0.001) or SIRS (AUROC 0.49 [95% CI, 0.44–0.54] p < 0.001).ConclusionsAn increase in SOFA score of ≥ 2 had better prognostic accuracy for both diagnosis of sepsis and in-hospital mortality in this setting, and especially on ICU, we observed limited validity of SIRS criteria and qSOFA in identifying hematological patients with sepsis and at high risk of death.

Evaluation of updated sepsis scoring systems and systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria and their association with sepsis in equine neonates.

BackgroundThe original equine sepsis score provided a method of identifying foals with sepsis. New variables associated with sepsis have been evaluated, but the sepsis score has not been updated.ObjectivesTo evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of 2 updated sepsis scores and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria in regard to detecting sepsis in foals.AnimalsTwo‐hundred and seventy‐three ill foals and 25 healthy control foals.MethodsHistorical, physical examination, and clinicopathologic findings were used to calculate the original sepsis score and 2 updated sepsis scores. SIRS criteria were also evaluated. Sepsis scores and positive SIRS scores were statistically compared to foals with sepsis.ResultsOne‐hundred and twenty‐six foals were septic and 147 sick‐nonseptic. The original and updated sepsis scores were significantly higher in septic foals as compared to sick‐nonseptic and healthy foals. The sensitivity and specificity of the updated sepsis scores to predict sepsis were not significantly better than those of the original sepsis score. One‐hundred and twenty‐seven of 273 (46.5%) foals met the original SIRS criteria and 88/273 (32%) foals met the equine neonatal SIRS criteria. The original SIRS criteria had similar sensitivity and specificity for predicting sepsis as did the 3 sepsis scores in our study.Conclusions and Clinical ImportanceThe updated sepsis scores did not provide improved ability in predicting sepsis. Fulfilling the original SIRS criteria provided similar sensitivity and specificity in predicting sepsis as the modified sepsis score and might serve as a diagnostic aid in identifying foals at risk for sepsis.

Performance of the quick Sequential (sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment score as a prognostic tool in infected patients outside the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe usefulness of the quick Sequential (Sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score in providing bedside criteria for early prediction of poor outcomes in patients with suspected infection remains controversial. We investigated the prognostic performance of a positive qSOFA score outside the intensive care unit (ICU) compared with positive systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Data were pooled on the basis of sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic OR. Overall test performance was summarized using a hierarchical summary ROC and the AUC. Meta-regression analysis was used to identify potential sources of bias.ResultsWe identified 23 studies with a total of 146,551 patients. When predicting in-hospital mortality in our meta-analysis, we identified pooled sensitivities of 0.51 for a positive qSOFA score and 0.86 for positive SIRS criteria, as well as pooled specificities of 0.83 for a positive qSOFA score and 0.29 for positive SIRS criteria. Discrimination for in-hospital mortality had similar AUCs between the two tools (0.74 vs. 0.71; P = 0.816). Using meta-regression analysis, an overall mortality rate ≥ 10% and timing of qSOFA score measurement could be significant sources of heterogeneity. For predicting acute organ dysfunction, although the AUC for a positive qSOFA score was higher than that for positive SIRS criteria (0.87 vs. 0.76; P < 0.001), the pooled sensitivity of positive qSOFA score was very low (0.47). In addition, a positive qSOFA score tended to be inferior to positive SIRS criteria in predicting ICU admission (0.63 vs. 0.78; P = 0.121).ConclusionsA positive qSOFA score had high specificity outside the ICU in early detection of in-hospital mortality, acute organ dysfunction, and ICU admission, but low sensitivity may have limitations as a predictive tool for adverse outcomes. Because between-study heterogeneity was highly represented among the studies, our results should be interpreted with caution.